ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Noorudin and his team (Maulvi Abdul Kareem and Mufti Sadiq) believed that Esa (as) had a biological father before they had ever met Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, they took this new belief from Sir Syed, who wrote it in 1880. They all worked together in Jammu, with Noorudin being the boss. Nevertheless, Noorudin and his team held the belief that Esa (as) had a biological father until 1903, wherein it is reported by Noorudin himself that he was forced to change his position on the order of MGA. However, after MGA died, per Lahori-Ahmadi sources, Noorudin ordered Muhammad Ali to write in his commentary of the Quran that Esa (As) had a biological father.    The Qadiani branch went on to call the miraculous birth of Esa (as) as less then a miracle and some sort of rationally explained phenomenon. Obviously, the classic islamic view is that Esa (as) was born miraculously, just like Adam (as). By the will of Allah. Interestingly, in 1902, the English ROR discussed the possibility of a biological father of Esa (as). In the same year, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Maryam got a Nikkah while 6-7 months pregnant with Eisa (as) (astagfarullah) and that Maryam was married when the angel blew into her (see 21:91). By 1908, MGA and his team of writers alleged that Maryam impregnated herself (see the quote in the below).

However, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s via Muhammad Ali and his famous 1918 commentary used MGA’s argument. In 1918, via the ROR of May, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s objected to the Lahori-Ahmadi belief that Eisa (As) had a biological father, which was clearly written in Muhammad Ali’s 1917 english commentary of the Quran. The secretary of the “Anjuman Taraqi-e-Islam” called this specific belief of the Lahori-Ahmadi’s as running counter to Islam. However, this was stolen from Sir Syed and by MGA himself. In 1927, the Ahmadiyya Movement claimed that Parthenogenesis created Eisa (as), not Allah. The same arguments were made in the first edition of the Moslem Sunrise (July-1921) by Muftree Muhammad Sadiq. Thus proving that as early as 1921, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s had came up with this ideology.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1886–1888
Ruhani Khaza’in, No. 2, vol. x, p. 53

“””””The Christians cannot stand their ground against Islam because they have taken as god a man who had a father, four brothers and two sisters, and was constantly persecuted by the Jews.””””
______________________________________________________________________________________________1890
Izala-e-Auham, Roohani Khazain vol 3 p.254 

“””””It is no wonder that God AlMighty might have given Jesus some technical know how so that by pressing a trigger or by somehow blowing on it, the clay toy took flight like a bird, or if it didn’t fly it might have walked. Because the Messiah, son of Mary had also been working as a carpenter with his father, Joseph, for twenty two years, and it is obvious that carpentry is a skill in which the faculty for inventing different sorts of machines and instruments is sharpened.””””

Scan

(ibid., p. 304)
“”””One should not at all be surprised that Jesus, like his paternal grandfather Solomon, may have shown this miracle of wisdom to the opponents of the time.”””” 
______________________________________________________________________________________________1893, in Hamamatul Bushra, an Arabic only book, page 90

“””””The ground on which this is based is his [Jesus Christ’s] creation without the agency of a human father, and the detail of this is that a certain section of the Jews, i.e. the Sadducees, were deniers of the Resurrection, so God informed them through some of His prophets that a son from among their community would be born without a father, and this would be a sign of the truth of Resurrection.””””

Scan

______________________________________________________________________________________________
1893–1895
Ruhani Khazain volume 6 Jang-e-Muqadas page 280-281
See pages 272-263 of the online english edition
The Holy War — A DEBATE BETWEEN ISLAM & CHRISTIANITY — Jang-e-Muqaddas (alislam.org)

“Do you believe birth of Jesus without father? Birth of Jesus without father doesn’t amaze me, Hazrat Adam was born without father and mother, Now rainy season is near, (you should) must go out and see how many insects get born itself. Therefore it’s a mistake to take it as proof of Jesus’s being God.”

Urdu Transliteration
“Masih ka bin baap paida hona mantay hain ya nahi?”
“Masih ka bin baap paida honay mari nagah ma koi ajoba baat nahi, Hazrat Adam AS maa or baap dono nahi rakhtay tah. Ab Kareeb Barsat Aati Ha, Zuroor Bahir Ja Kar Daikhien K Kitnay Keeray Mokohray Baghair Maa Baap K Paida Ho Jatay Hain. Pas es sa Masih ki khudai ka suboot nakalna sirf ghalti ha.”   
______________________________________________________________________________________________
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/03/30/ayyamus-sulah-quotes-and-background-info/

roohani khazyian 14 -page 300 (ayam alsulah)

“”5th point is their customs, which are similar to Jews, as their tribes don’t make a difference between regular relationship and marriage. Ladies meet their fiance quite often. Hazrat Mariam used to meet with her fiance Yousaf (Yusuf)(Joseph) before marriage, this is quote sufficient evidence of jewish customs. But these customs are too much between women of tribes of Sarhad, some of these women even get pregnant before nikah (marriage), and its not considered bad, people used to get-away with it and laugh, because like jews they believe “this-arrangement” to be like a nikah, because before it they fix a dowry for it…”

Scan

______________________________________________________________________________________________
1901
Al-Hakam, June 24, 1901

“Our faith and belief is this that Jesus was born of no father, and Allāh has the power to do all things. The rationalists, called Naturies among us, who try to establish that he was born of a human father they are making a serious blunder. The Lord God of such people is a dead Lord God. The prayers and supplications of such people are not granted who assume that Allāh cannot cause a child to be born independently of the agency of a human male in the role of a father. We consider a man who holds this view to have fallen out of the pale of Islam.”
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1902

In the english ROR of April 1902, on pages 143-144, it is discussed how some new sect of Muslims called “Naichri” in english as “Naturalist”. They were referring to the followers of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan at the Aligarh University, who were all Quranist and also denied the physical return of Esa (as) as well as the fatherless birth as early as 1880. It is strange that the ROR refers to them as such.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Oct
Via, Noah’s Ark, Page 30

“”I honour not only the Messiah, but also his four brothers,1 as all five of them were sons of the same mother. I also regard his two biological sisters as pious, for they are all from the womb of the Holy Virgin Mary. Mary’s greatness lies in the fact that she abstained from marriage for quite a time and eventually yielded only due to the insistence of her elders during pregnancy. Certain people object that Mary married during her pregnancy, which is against the teachings of the Torah. In this way, she wrongfully broke her covenant of remaining a virgin and also opened the door to polygamy, since Mary agreed to enter into matrimony with Joseph the Carpenter, though he was already married at the time. However, I say that these were compelling circumstances, which happened to arise, and for this reason both ought to be looked upon with mercy rather than disdain.

Footnote: Christ the Messiah had four brothers and two sisters who were related to Christ by blood and were the children of Joseph and Mary. The names of his four brothers are (1) Judas, (2) James, (3) Simon and (4) Justus. The names of his two sisters are (1) Assia and (2) Lydia. See Apostolic Records by Father John Allen Giles, London, 1886, pp. 159, 166. (Author).””””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Malfuzat, Vol. 1, page 475, edition unknown

“””I have always believed that Hazrat Eisa (as) was born without father…”

Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Malfuzat

Vol. 1, page 496

“”Eisa (as) was born without father..”

Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Malfuzat, Vol-3, page 175-176, 2022 edition
Placed in Oct-1-1902 by the Qadianis
In 1902, MGA said Maryam was married when the angel blew into her – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Commentary
MGA said that Maryam had a nikkah with Joseph while she was pregnant. Razi even quoted 4:24 of the Quran as he argued that Maryam must have been married to Joseph (since MGA said so), while she was pregnant with Eisa (as). Razi was quoting the phrase “wa mushanatoo” (word was used 5 times in the Quran) in 4:24 and said that Maryam was also called “wa mushanatoo”, however, Razi was trying to link muh-sanaat to ahsanat. Eventually, Razi conceded. He did mention how MGA called this as a “historical error” in Islam (astagfarullah)(See Malfuzat, Vol-3, page 175-176).

Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Oct
Malfuzat, Vol-3, page 305

In a recent live stream, Bro Imtiaz showed a reference (3:11:28 time stamp) from Malfuzat, Vol-3, page 305 (sub ref is not given). In this quote, MGA explains the birth of Eisa (as) by comparing it with Male men breastfeeding infants. In fact, as early as 1882, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was indirectly denying Quran 3:49, as he denied the miracles of Esa (as). MGA said exact same thing in 1886, via Surma Chasmay Arya (See the full quote in the below). Thus, Ahmadi’s redefine the word miracle and allege that rare natural phenomenon are miracles.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1903

“One of the doctrines we hold is that Jesus Christ and John the Baptist were both born miraculously . . . And the secret in creating Jesus and John in this manner was the manifestation of a great sign . . . And the first thing He [God] did to bring this about was the creation of Jesus without a father through the manifestation of Divine power only.” (Mawahib al-Rahman, pp. 70-72).

“And this is also a part of our belief that the birth of Jesus took place against the normal laws”…….

“Either we believe that Jesus was born on the decree of God, such is the way of Allah, He creates what He pleases, When He decrees a thing He says to it, ‘To be,’ and it is. Or, God forbid, his birth was illegitimate.” (Ruhani Khaza’in, v. 19, Introduction to the book Page 17).

^^^ These are quoted here.  See page 344.

Mawahibur-Rahman, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol 19, p. 295

Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1903
Tadhkiratush Shahadatayn [The Two Martyrs]. Ziaul Islam, 1903. R. K. xx. 35

“””The sixteenth characteristic of the Prophet Jesus was that, being born without a father, he was like the Prophet Adam. Similarly, I being born a twin have a resemblance of a sort with the Prophet Adam: according to what the sage Mohiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi has mentioned about the Seal of the Caliphs to be of Chinese ancestry that is to say of Mongol origin, to be born the second of twins, a girl being born first, I was born exactly the same way on a Friday morning. It is not known from where ibn ‘Arabi got hold of this prophecy, but it has come to pass. This prediction is to be found in his books to this day.””
_______________________________________________________________________________________________Nasim-e-Da‘wat, Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 19, pp. 381
https://www.youtube.com/live/v32Lm0-rLMM?si=QFuSdTdhD8wC6xE7

Translation
Mary was slandered/accused and this slander humiliated the wonder of the birth of Eisa (as). But in this slander, the Jews alone are not be to blamed, but Mary herself had made a huge mistake, which gave the Jews an opportunity to slander her, and that is when Mary saw the angel in her vision/dream, and when the angel announced the good news of the pregnancy, Maryam deliberately kept this vision a secret, and she never told anyone, because her mother and father had dedicated her to the temple (Baitul Maqdas), she would always stay and work at the temple, and she would not ever marry and will remain a virgin. And she had herself decided that she would not get a husband and would remain in Baitul Maqdas. After having this dream, she had this fear, that if she disclosed this secret, that an angel has given her the good news of a boy, people will think it is a ploy to get married. That’s why, she kept this vision/dream a secret. But that dream was true, she got pregnant at the same time. And Maryam was unaware of this pregnancy for some time. After the 5th month of the pregnancy had passed, then it became famous that Maryam was pregnant, and then Maryam told people about her dream, but at that time it was useless to say so. At the end, her elders (Jewish elders), in an attempt to hide her shame/guilt, they got her married to Joseph the Carpenter. This is how this prophecy was stained””. 

Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1904
(see “hazratmaulvinoorudeen” by Muhammad Zafrullah Khan, 2nd edition, published in 2006, page 100).

Noorudin contradicts MGA as he writes his biography and writes that it is not mandatory to believe that Esa (as) didn’t have a father.

Zafrullah Khan tells us in his biographical book on Noorudin as follows:

“”The birth of Jesus (as) without a father had been a somewhat controversial question. Maulawi Nur-ud- Din ra had held the view that Jesus had a father. The Promised Messiah (as), in his book Mawahibur Rahman, announced that it was part of his doctrine that Jesus (as)
had been born without a father. On reading this Maulawi Sahib (ra) discarded his view and fell into line with the view propounded by the Promised Messiah (as).  He frankly confessed this change of view in his book Nur-ud-Din.”””

______________________________________________________________________________________________
1906
(Chashma Masihi 28, RK 356)(See also the online english edition of this book, see, page 29).

When thousands of insects are born by themselves during the rainy season, and Adam (as) was also born without parents, it is no proof of Jesus’ eminence if he, too, was born in the same manner. In fact, being born without a father deprives a person of certain faculties. 
______________________________________________________________________________________________1907
(Badr, May 16, 1907, page 3)

“On a perusal of the Holy Qur`ān, this is what emerges as the truth, namely, that Jesus was fatherless; and this is a matter on which no question can come to lie. Where Allāh calls this birth as resembling the birth of Adam, it is an indication that in this birth there is an element of an extraordinary process of nature, to which a reference had to be made, for an explanation, by likening it to the example of Adam.” 
______________________________________________________________________________________________1908

“”””The [Arya Samajist] lecturer also objected to Mary bearing a child by the Holy Spirit and to Jesus being born from Mary alone. The reply is that this was done by the same God who, according to the Arya Samaj teachings, creates millions of people in the beginning of every new creation, just as vegetables grow out of the earth. If, according to the Vedic teachings, God has created the world millions of times, nay times without number, in this manner, and there was no need that men and women should unite together in order that a child should be born, where is the harm if Jesus Christ was born similarly?”””” (Chashma Ma‘rifat, p. 217).

“”””Man originally was not created from sperm, but one being was created from another. After that, the second law took effect, by which human beings are created from sperm.””””(Chashma Ma‘rifa,p. 215).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said that Maryam could create male sperm and impregnate herself – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 23 page 226
Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, page 218

Ruhani Khazain, volume 23, page 225 and 226, Chasma-e-Maarfat:

“””Then the reader of the article raised an objection that why did Mary become pregnant by the Holy Spirit and why was Jesus born only to Mary. The answer to this is that the same God created him who, according to the Arya society, at the beginning of the earth created millions of people like radish and carrots every day, while according to the statement of the Vedas, millions of times and countless times God has created the world in the same way and did not require that a man and a woman meet to produce a child. So, if Jesus was born in the same way, then what is wrong with it? The root of this objection is only that why a man was born without the union of man and woman, but the person who holds this belief that it has been agreed millions of times before that this is the same in this world. Human beings are born without the union of  male and female. How can he say this and how can he have the right to object against the birth of Jesus is against the Law of Nature. Great medical researchers who have gone before us have written about examples of birth and given precedents and their research shows that there are women who possess masculinity (sperm) and femininity (egg) in them and by some system when their semen is excited, pregnancy can occur, and such stories are also found in Hindu books. As in the Veda itself, it is said that O’Indra is the son of Karshi, whom I have written about earlier, so while this kind of story is also present in the Vedas and explained by Sayana Bhashikar then why question it? If this story has been written, then it is far from modest to object. Then he will say that the given answer that we presented does not mean that, and that the answer is not correct however it has been explained by the old commentator i.e., Sayana who has already made this meaning, so why do you want to turn away from it? Against Sayana Bhashikar, can we present Dayanand as the truth? In contrast to Sayana Bhashikar, one would call Dayanand a schoolboy, and then that Bhashikar belongs to the ancient past. And that by virtue of order the meaning of the Vedas that has been given by Sayana Bhashikar is above all whether you accept these meanings now or not, in any case……”””

Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________1911
Badr, 24th August 1911

“There is another debate, as to whether the Messiah was born without father or not. I say: Did 124,000 prophets have fathers or not? The Shariah has not laid upon us the obligation to make investigation about the mothers, fathers, sisters and brothers of prophets. These matters are not a part of your spiritual progress.” 
________________________________________________________________________________________________1913
Tashhiz al-Azhan, April 1913, pp. 165 – 170

“The reverend says that all Muslims are agreed upon this issue, except Sir Sayyid who has rejected it on rational grounds, but that no one has rejected it on the basis of the Holy Quran. However, I will go on to show that he is wrong in saying that no one has rejected it from the Holy Quran. I will prove that people have shed light on this from the Quran itself and have proved that Jesus was not born without a father, but was born like the rest of the world. What I mean to say is that there have been differences on this issue, and that some people have believed Jesus to have had a father.”

It seems that the District Magistrate (of Lahore) asked for money from Maulvi Sanaullah’s as a result of an article in the “Ahl-e-Hadis” magazine of Oct-31, 1913. This seems to be a response to the Qadiani article on the birth of Eisa (As). The grossly obscene Qadiani article appeared in the Al-Badr of Oct-30-1913. Maulvi Sanaullah and his team from his “Ahl-e-Hadis” magazine was forced to pay money as a form of a security. The Al-Badr was also forced to pay 3000 rupees as penalty. Reverend Mr. Howell seems to have also been part of this and he was warned by District Magistrate (of Lahore) and the Bishop of Lahore. Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was mentioned too and let off with a warning.

Al-Badr of Oct-30-1913
Scans

______________________________________________________________________________________________
1917

Muhammad Ali’s 1917 english commentary of the Quran is published wherein it is written that Joseph was the biological father of Eisa (As).

The ROR of June-1917 has an essay by Mirza Bashir Ahmad entitled, “The Grand Mystery Underlying the Unusual Birth of Jesus Christ”, wherein he argues that Mary never met a man before she gave birth to Jesus (as).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1918

In 1918, via the ROR of May, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s objected to the Lahori-Ahmadi belief that Eisa (As) had a biological father, which was clearly written in Muhammad Ali’s 1917 english commentary of the Quran. The secretary of the “Anjuman Taraqi-e-Islam” called this specific belief of the Lahori-Ahmadi’s as running counter to Islam. However, this was stolen from Sir Syed and by MGA himself.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1921

In 1921, via the Moslem Sunrise (July-1921) Mufti Muhammad Sadiq argued that Eisa (as) was born via Parthenogenesis.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1923, via Seeratul Mahdi
Vol. 1, page 609-610
Narration number 645

Dr. Mir Muhammad Ismail relates a story of how he was around MGA and they were discussing the birth of Eisa (As) without a father. MGA seems to have said that the reason why Allah made Eisa (as) to be born without a father was because all the Jewish men didn’t have “nutfay” (sperm) for a prophet (paygumber) to be born.

Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1927
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2021/11/19/in-1927-the-ahmadiyya-movement-claimed-that-parthenogenesis-created-eisa-as-not-allah/

In the January 1927 edition of the ROR, the Ahmadiyya Movement published (and endorsed) an essay by a doctor named M.S. Nawaz, M.B., B.S., (from India), its unclear if this man was an ahmadi or not. The title of the essay is “Parthenogenesis (virgin birth)”. In this essay, it is plainly stated that since animals can reproduce without male sperm, this explains the virgin birth of Eisa (as) (astagfarullah). The Ahmadiyya Movement was thus denying verses of the quran (21:91 and 66:12)(in the qadiani quran it would be 22:92 and 66:13).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1990’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/07/mirza-tahir-ahmad-called-esa-ass-mother-a-hermaphrodite/

Mirza Tahir Ahmad went a step further in his assertions. He eventually asserted that Maryam (ra) was a hermaphrodite, watch this tik tok clip. This clip is from a question and answer session by Mirza Tahir Ahmad in the 1990’s. Mirza Tahir Ahmad also said that a woman from Africa was the first human.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays

Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was a student of Noorudin, pre-1891

In 1921, the Ahmadiyya Movement claimed that Parthenogenesis created Eisa (as), not allah

Mirza Tahir Ahmad called Esa (as)’s mother a Hermaphrodite!!!!

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/29/maulana-nur-ud-din-wrote-a-book-entitled-nur-ud-din-1904-mga-was-born-in-1839/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/07/noor-uddin-secretly-disagreed-with-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-on-the-birth-of-esa-as/

http://www.muslim.org/books/f-ahm-mv/ch12.htm#u

Muhammad Ali (the Lahori-Ahmadi) denies the miraculous birth of Esa (as) in 1917

What was the Anjuman Taraqi-e-Islam?

Mirza Tahir Ahmad called Esa (as)’s mother a Hermaphrodite!!!!

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said that Maryam could create male sperm and impregnate herself – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam