Intro
You can find this online herein. MGA denied all types of offensive and violent Jihad, especially against a government that allowed for total religious freedom. However, Ahmadi’s deny this nowadays, since most Ahmadis’ don’t follow MGA, they follow their Khalifa’s. In fact, in 1911, Ahmadi’s were calling MGA a law-bearing prophet based on the idea that he abrogated Jihad. In 1947, the Ahmadiyua Khalifa authorized Violent and offensive Jihad and thus contradicted his fathers’ work. The Mirza family even wrote that it was OK to kill Ahmadi’s, since Pakistani Ahmadi’s were fighting vs. India and many Ahmadi’s were in the Indian military in 1947, see the Furqan Force.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________
This essay was published in the ROR of January 1903
http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR190301.pdf#page=22
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Noorudin said that if MGA even claimed law-bearing prophethood, it was OK
Noorudin didn’t care if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed even law-bearing prophethood
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Related Essays
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Sialkot #Mosqueattack
4 Pingback