Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Search results

"="

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said travelling means moving in a cart driven by a horse for 10 miles and train=NO FASTING in ramadhan

Intro
We have found a story in Seeratul Mahdi which explains MGA’s position on fasting during Ramadhan and travelling in modern means (see Quranic verse 2:185). In this story, some friends had come from Lahore, most likely from train, Lahore to Batala and then via a cart driven by a Bull or horse or Oxe. MGA emphatically stated that this type of travel made it impermissible to fast during Ramadhan.

Furthermore, the majority of scholars of Islam view that fasting whilst traveling is permissible. If the traveler fasts, it counts and he does not have to make it up. For more, please see the detailed answer. The four Imams and the majority of the Sahabah and Tabi’in were of the view that fasting whilst traveling is permissible and is correct and valid. If the traveler fasts, it counts and he does not have to make it up. (Al-Mawsu’ah al-Fiqhiyyah, vol. 28, p. 73)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Serat ul mehdi 381

“Dr. Mir Muhammad Ismail Sahib told me that once some friends from Lahore came to Qadian during Ramadan. When Hazrat Sahib was informed, he came to the mosque to meet them with breakfast. These friends He said, “We are all fasting.” He said, “Fasting while traveling is not right. We should follow the permission of Allah, the Exalted, so we made them breakfast and broke their fast.”

Scan


_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

https://islamqa.info/en/answers/20165/fasting-while-traveling-permissible

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim  #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Musleh Maud said rejecting his Khilafat = Rejecting Prophet Muhammad and all prophets

Intro
We have found a reference in terms of the #MuslehMaud and his Khilafat from 1917. This was posted over at the islam_ahmadiyya reddit forum.

Continue reading “Musleh Maud said rejecting his Khilafat = Rejecting Prophet Muhammad and all prophets”

In 1918, Ahmadi’s told Walter that MGA’s god revealed to him that Yuz Asaf= Eisa (As)

Intro
In 1913, Howard Arnold Walter travelled to Kashmir and inquired about the tomb of Yuz Asaf. In 1914, he wrote “Islam in Kashmir” in the Moslem World magazine. The ROR of Nov-1915 reviews his article that appeared in the “Young Men of India”. The ROR of Dec-1915 has an article by him entitled, “Devotional Readings in the Quran”. He was also conducting research on Ahmadiyya in this era. From 1916-1918, H. A. Walter seems to have written this in-depth biography of the Ahmadiyya Movement, he was in Qadian and spoke to the Khalifa and was advised in terms of the beliefs of MGA. It was published in roughly Oct-Nov of 1918 (See the preface, which signs off at 10-10-1918, Walter died just 3 weeks later). This book was edited Farquhar, who had written about the Ahmadiyya Movement in 1914-1915 and was published.

In this book, he tells the world that while he was in Mohallah Khan Yar in the summer of 1913. He visited the tomb (and seems like he didn’t read the research work on Weitbrecht) and asked many questions. He says that Muslims told him that this house (gravesite) was in possession of the Hindu’s/Buddhist’s until Shia Islam came via Bulbul Shah. Walter then writes that this is the tomb that MGA said was miraculously revealed to him. Walter also explained how Hindu temples were being destroyed in Kashmir. In the 1990’s, Mirza Tahir Ahmad began casting doubt on the Yuz Asaf theory, and thus, by 2021, Ahmadi’s are calling it mere conjecture by MGA.

Continue reading “In 1918, Ahmadi’s told Walter that MGA’s god revealed to him that Yuz Asaf= Eisa (As)”

Khalifa Nur-ud-Din lied about 72 witnesses and 570 ulema of Kashmir believing that Yuz Asaf=Eisa (as)

Intro
After MGA wrote Raz-e-Haqiqat and lied to the world about Yuz Asaf (1898), MGA and his team decided to send Khalifa Nur ud Din to Mohalla Khanyar, Srinagar, Kashmir on a fact finding expedition. You can listen to our sister Pious Spirit explaining this in her video on the Shamd ud Din RB channel (at 18:58 she explains Maulvi Abdullah). This is very odd, since it seems like Maulvi Abdullah left Ahmadiyya shortly after his letter was published in Raz-e-Haqiqat. Ahmadiyya sources tell us that in 1899, MGA and his team began writing the famous “Jesus in India” (it was published as incomplete book after MGA died in 1908). MGA published an announcement entitled, Al-Ishtihar al-Ansar (Announcement – the Helpers) on October 4, 1899 (See Mujadid-e-Azim, online english abridged version, page 835. However, in this announcement, MGA was telling the world that Khalifa Nur ud Din Jamooni had already went to Mohalla Khanyar, Srinagar, Kashmir and obtained the testimony of 556 ulema (see the Friday Sermon of Mirza Masroor Ahmad of 5-25-12 at the 33:28 to 35:19 mark, we have condensed this into a tik tok too)(see also Mujadid-e-Azim, online english abridged version. In 2012, Mirza Masroor said it was 560 ulema. Dard also mentions this announcement of 10-4-1899 (see pages 684-685). Dard claims that the expedition didn’t leave until 11-12-1889, thus contradicting the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. Nevertheless, 3 years, MGA and his team published “Al-Huda Wa-Tabsirato Liman Yara” (arabic only) and claimed that Khalifa Nur ud Din had 72 witnesses and even wrote their names who were supposedly testifying that Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as). In fact, in “Al-Huda Wa-Tabsirato Liman Yara”, MGA and his team of editors claimed that claimed that 100,000 people are witnesses that Yuz Asaf = Eisa (as).

In 1945, Maulvi Abdullah popped back into the story. He seems to have written a letter to Qadian wherein he stated that the letter which he wrote to MGA had been interpolated by MGA and his team of writers, he was a Bahai at this point and wanted to set the record straight (see all the scans in the below). Maulvi Abdullah said that he wrote this letter in response to an article by the Al-Furqan of 1944, wherein it was argued that generation after generation of Muslims believed Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as)(see Pious Spirit at the 47:56 mark). Nevertheless, Maulvi Abdullah says that the Khalifa never responded to his letter. However, in an Ahmadiyya newspaper, “The Furqan” of February 1946 (see page 40), (see Pious Spirit at the 36:25 mark), the Khalifa wrote that the denial of Maulvi Abdullah makes no difference in the case of Yuz Asaf = Eisa (as), many companions of MGA went on a fact finding expedition and also confirmed that Yuz Asaf = Eisa (as). The Khalifa continued that this knowledge {that Yuz Asaf = Eisa (as)} has been passes down through many generations of the families that live in Mohalla Khanyar. Thus, the 2nd Khalifa was claiming that MGA was wrong as he quoted Maulvi Abdullah’s letter in Raz-e-Haqiqat. Maulvi Abdullah goes on to state that the majority of the Muslims and ulema of Kashmir consider MGA to be a Kafir. At the end, Maulvi Abdullah seems to have been a rogue-Lahori-Ahmadi, he did eventually convert to Bahaism before he died. Maulvi Abdullah also says that the list of 72 witnesses was his work, and not that of Khalifa Nur ud Din, thus, proving that MGA and his team fabricated the expedition of Khalifa Nur ud Din, moreover, in those survey’s that were given out, it was never written that Eisa (as) was buried in Yuz Asaf’s grave, thus, destroying the Ahmadiyya position. Maulvi Abdullah also seems to have gotten 55 of the 72 to attest to the fact that they don’t believe that Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as) (see Pious Spirit at 22:04).

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM85ghbnW/

Continue reading “Khalifa Nur-ud-Din lied about 72 witnesses and 570 ulema of Kashmir believing that Yuz Asaf=Eisa (as)”

Shams ud Din inspired and educated Watson Gill about the Ahmadi belief of Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as)

Intro
Shams ud Din has inspired 1000’s of people towards the reality of #Qadianism, including me, Bashir Ahmad Shah. Shams ud Din was the first ever researcher to point out the academic dishonesty of MGA in terms of the Yuz Asaf data in “Kamal-ud-Din WA Itmam ul Naimat” and other books like Tarikh Azami.

Nevertheless, a Pakistani-Christian pastor, Watson Gill made this video based on Shams ud Din’s research work, enjoy. Many Pakistani Christians have objected to #Ahmadiyya and their fake asylum business, see here.

Continue reading “Shams ud Din inspired and educated Watson Gill about the Ahmadi belief of Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as)”

Saleem Mir says that the Ahmadiyya jamaat doesn’t claim Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as) per the quran or hadith

Intro
The Shams ud Din challenge has left Ahmadi’s baffled. Yahya Khan and Saleem Mir didn’t know that MGA and his team of writers used 23:50 of the Quran to prove that Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as). We recently caught Saleem Mir admitting to this.

Continue reading “Saleem Mir says that the Ahmadiyya jamaat doesn’t claim Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as) per the quran or hadith”

From 1901 to roughly 1922 Ahmadis believed MGA=Muhammad

Intro
Ahmadiyya beliefs are always changing. In the earlier years, they changed a lot. After MGA died, they continued to change. In 1914, they kept changing. MGA’s sons did Takfir on the entire Muslim world. However, by 1922, they stopped. Maybe it was their private meeting by the Queen of England in 1924? Nonetheless, in the below, I have found yet another quotation from the infamous book, “Kalimat ul Fasl” (1916) wherein MGA is described as on equal footing with Muhammad (Saw) (naozobillah). However, this is what the Qadiani-Ahmadis believed.  There are many other instances from this era which prove my assertion.  

1.  Zaheeruddin was claiming that MGA was a law-bearing prophet in 1911.
2.  MGA abrogated jihad in 1900 and was thus a law-bearing prophet (see Nuzhat haneef).
3.  MGA=Muhammad and vice versa
4.  MGA was the person allah spoke about in the famous “Ismuhu-Ahmad” verse of the Quran.
Continue reading “From 1901 to roughly 1922 Ahmadis believed MGA=Muhammad”

John Rippon rips the Ahmadiyya belief that Esa (As) =Yuz Asaph and was buried in Kashmir

Intro
By 2020, we have figured out exactly how MGA and his team of writers/reciters fabricated this entire story. As we all know, MGA and his team of writers/editors lied about almost everything they did. We have fodn a huge case of academic dishonesty in terms of MGA’s quotations to a persian book, “Ayn-ul-Hayat”. MGA and his team first quoted this book in 1898, in a book called ‘Raz-e-Haqiqat”, which was translated and published into english in 2016, see page 24. However, they were academically dishonest, they purposely didn’t mention that Yuz Asaf had a father and many other things, an Ex-Ahmadi, Shams ud Din, recently got a hold of Ayn ul Hayat and posted his results in a video, make sure you watch Part-2 also, these are in Urdu and watch part 3. We have also found “Ayn ul Hayat” and have posted the PDF’s in the below. This book proves that MGA totally lied. Shams ud Din found the book “Rahul ul Hayat” by Allama Muhammad Bakir, there is an urdu translation called, “Ainul Hayat”. On page 361, it is written that Yuz Asaf had a father in Kashmir. This immediately cancelled Yuz Asaf becoming Esa (As), since Esa (as) historically never had a father. Yuz Asaf was the son of a King and was able to live a life of excess. MGA never mentioned any of this. Yuz Asaf’s dad was a drunkard, and even prayed to idols. It is also important to read about Maulvi Shaikh Abdullah Wakeel’s story about Yuz Asaf.
Continue reading “John Rippon rips the Ahmadiyya belief that Esa (As) =Yuz Asaph and was buried in Kashmir”

In Ahmadiyya, Islam= the revelations of MGA+the Quran

Intro
The Sunni-version of Islam is as follows, Hadith+Sunnah+the Quran=Islam. It is common sense that the Quran without the hadith/sunnah is incomplete. The Quranist has faded away into the annals of islamic thought by 1800. However, Sir Syed revived this theory of Islam in the 1870’s. Some of his admirers were Noorudin, Abdul Kareem, MGA and Mufti Sadiq. Sir Syed had even wrote that Esa (as) was never returning (1882) and he denied all concepts of the Mahdi.
Continue reading “In Ahmadiyya, Islam= the revelations of MGA+the Quran”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑