Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

" Batalvi"

“Nikama Nabi” or “The Useless Prophet” by Babu Ghulam Mustafa Sb son of Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi

Intro
A Pamphlet having shown 43 claims (titles) of Mirza qadyani and poetry by Ahle hadith ulema by the Title ‘nakama nabi” or “The Useless Prophet” (in english) Mirza Qadyani and his 43 titles claimed .(printed in 1937 by ) Babu Ghulam Mustafa Sb son of the famous Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi.

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam  

The Pamphlet
Nikama-Nabi by

Batalvi sent some of his children to Qadian for schooling

Intro
Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi was a great friend of MGA and then later became a major enemy.  However, after MGA died, Batalvi seemed to have buried the hatchet, he was allowed to write an article in the ROR.  In fact, he seems to have sent his children to school in Qadian in from 1910–1912.

The reference  
Life of Ahmad

http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Li … 0411MN.pdf

page 368 footnote

“Muhammad Husain had two wives and seven sons and three daughters. He himself says that they had all turned out to be thoroughly wicked and irreligious. They severed all connection with their father and some of them even conspired to kill him (Isha‘atus Sunnah, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 225, 226). In 1910 Muhammad Husain complained of his children’s wickedness to the Editor of Al-Hakam Qadian, who advised him to send the two younger ones to the Qadian school. He accepted this advice and sent them to Qadian.

When his friends came to know of it he had to write in defence in the Ahl-e- Hadith, Amritsar, dated 25-2-1910 that the boys were well looked after and that their religious beliefs were not being interfered with. But the enemies of Ahmadas could not bear it, so they pressed Muhammad Husain to get his sons out of Qadian. At last he yielded and sent them to Rupar where they drifted into ways of profligacy. On December 1, 1912, the two boys were brought to the Anjuman Ahmadiyya, Lucknow, in a miserable state. There was a complaint and the matter came to the notice of the police and the court. The Ahmadis of Lucknow tried to wean them from their wicked way of life but with no success.

Muhammad Husain died a miserable death in the beginning of 1920 at Batala. (See Batalvi ka Anjam by Mir Qasim Ali, 1931) ”

Batalvi’s article in the ROR
49/480 of the pdf or see page 46 thru 78.

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/revi … sh1910.pdf

Muhammad Hussain Batalvi gave Mirza Ghulam Ahmad a glowing review in 1884

Intro
Batalvi and MGA were close friends up to 1891, they were both the same age and had shared some of the same teachers, further, MGA’s father knew Batalvi’s father and etc etc etc.  In 1884, A fatwa of Kufr landed on MGA’s head from many Muslims in India, this was in response to MGA’s Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya Vol. 4 which was published in the early summer of 1884.  MGA had went the Sir Syed-route and denied all of the miracles of Esa (As), however MGA was a a Ahle-Hadith (aka Wahabbi) affiliated person, in fact, his friend Noorudin was also Ahle-Hadith, as was his future wife, Nusrat Jehan and her father and Batalvi, who helped MGA arrange this marriage.

The quotes
See Upal(2017), page 125 and onward

“””In our opinion, it is in this time and in the present circumstances, a book the like of which has not been written up to this time in Islam, and nothing can be said about the future; Allah may bring about another affair after this. Its author, too, has proved himself firm in helping the cause of Islam, with his property, his person, his pen, his tongue and his personal religious experience, to such an extent that it is rarely seen among Muslims who have gone before. If someone thinks that my words are Asian exaggeration then show me at least one such book that confronts opponents of Islam especially the Arya Samaj with such gusto and enthusiasm. And point out such supporters of Islam who have taken upon themselves to help the cause of Islam with their property, their person, their treasure, their pen, and their tongue. And who has successfully challenged, with all his manly courage, opponents of Islam and deniers of revelation that if they doubt divine revelation to visit him and experience, observe and taste it. (Batalavi, 1884: 169-170).”””

“””Perhaps some of our critics will place me in the same category as the author of Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya and slap the fatwa of kufr on me as well. They may say that I have raised the author of Braheen to the level of prophet Muhammad and I have declared his revelations to be innocent similar to the revelations of the Prophet but I am not afraid of their fatwa of kufr… (Batalavi, 1884: 284)”””

:”””What does he [Mirza Ghulam Ahmad] conclude from his revelations and miracles? Does he use them to prove his prophethood or the prophethood of Muhammad? What religion does he invite people (including many top padres, pundits, Brahmo Arya rajas, and sardars of other religions) with such bravery and boldness? Is it the Islamic religion or Ahmadi religion or Mirzai religion? Unless you are a person whose heart has been darkened with prejudice, these arguments and reasoning would have convinced you that he absolutely makes no claim whatsoever to his own prophethood [emphasis in the original]. The true purpose of all of each and every one of his claims is the proof of prophethood of Muhammad. (Batalavi, 1884: 278-279).

MIrza Ghulam Ahmad vs. Batalvi–1891-1892 era, MGA sent 10 Lanats on Batalvi

Intro
After claiming to be the Messiah in 1891, Batalvi turned on MGA and his team of ghost writers.  Batalvi began his beef with MGA which lasted til MGA died.  MGA even made predictions that Batalvi would eventually join Ahmadiyya and etc, however, like all of MGA’s predictions, those also failed.

A summary of this situation, written by a friend

MIRZA’S FAILED PROPHESY AND 10 CURSES TO MOLANA MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN BATALVI

In his book Aina Kamalat e Islam at page 601-604, Mirza Ghulam Qadiyani writes that Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi always criticise me and says i am an uneducated man , incompetent in Arabic language knowledge. He also says that Molvi Nooruddin is only a Hakim and Molvi Ahsan Amrohi is only a munshi. (Clerk). So he Mirza challenged Batalvi to have a contest of writing tafsir of 80 verses from Quraan and writing poetry (Naat). Few months ago the date of which i don,t remember, I saw an article by Muhammad Hussain Batalvi wherein Batalvi calls me dajjal, liar and dishonest. Beside this he says I am ignorant of religious knowledge. He insulted me like this repeatedly.

Then I cried before Allah swt for help, after this prayer I received Ilham “UDOONI ASTAJIB LAKUM” meaning pray to Me I will accept . So i prayed for victory against Batalvi, my heart got cleared I understood that my prayers have been answered. The Ilham “ INNI MAHEENUN MAN ARAD AHANTIKA
(I will humiliate those who intend to humiliate you) seems to have materialised. For this contest i prayed before Allah to destroy the liar. I have prayed for the contest fixing a time period of 40 days.

Now if i lose and my prayers are not answered then non acceptance of my prayer will prove my ilham as lie. I may be treated as liar and shall be prepared to accept any punishment. If Batalvi loses the contest his ignorance and humiliation shall be revealed to the world. But if he runs away from the contest he would receive 10 curses from Allah swt. After writing this MGQ writes words “Laanat” 10 times in his book.

Qadiyanis propagated this 40 days prayer of Mirza far and wide at that time. Every follower of Mirza was anxiously waiting for a heavenly calamity or accident to fall upon Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi days in and days out. As the time goes by without any such news many were of the opinion that Batalvi could fall prey to such a mishap at the eleventh hour.
Finally the 40 days time line passed but to the disappointment of qadiyanis nothing happened to Batalvi. Qadiyanis felt very sad to know that neither Mirza,s Ilham proved true nor his prayers were answered .

After this Batalvi wrote in his Magazine IShaatussunnah :

“Dear readers it is 30th April 1892 today , three days have passed after the expiry of 40 days time line. I am flourishing and am better than Mirza in health, wealth and in children. May be Mirza would justify his failed prophesy by telling his Mureeds that It was meant a metaphoric AZAB would fall on me on qayamah or he could say look Batalvi felt great distress during fasting or see Batalvi ,s son has suffered from cold and cough and in this way my prophesy has fulfilled with extreme grace.””

The scans


Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s debate with Batalvi (summer of 1891) was stopped by the British govt on MGA’s behalf

Intro
MGA was always favored by the British government, in fact, he was always given a chair when he went to court, whereas all other indians were forced to stand, moreover, the white people never even considered Indians as humans, since in terms of trains, white people never traveled in the same car as Indians.  Nonetheless, I have produced in the reference in the below wherein Dr. Basharat Ahmad explains how the British govt. intervened and kicked Batalvi out of Ludhiana and hence ended his debate with MGA.  Further, it is interesting to note that MGA barely had 5 debates in his entire career, this was one the earliest, and it was never a fair debate, since the British police were on the scene, protecting MGA and his team.  Further, MGA and his team would have been killed if it wasnt for the British govt.  This kept happening over and over again…read this entry about MGA in 1904 and a riot.

A summary of this quotation

The collaboration and cooperation between British colonial empire and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani has not been a secret issue. Mirza, in his book, himself states that he was planted by Britishers.

However, Ahmadi mullah either don,t accept this or do interpret this differently to creat polarisation so that the lies remain hidden from the eyes of simple ahmadi fellows.

Dr. Bashaarat Ahmad a Lahori Qadiayni, while describing the 13 days long debate between MGAQ and Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, held on 20 July, 1891 at Ludhiana, states that there developed a situation of Law and Order in Ludhiana after the debate. The British govt ordered Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi and his fellow Ulema to leave the city of Ludhiana immediately. British Deputy Commissioner deputed one deputy and In charge Police Station Ludhiana to execute the orders who physically expelled Molana and his friends from Ludhiana.

On the contrary No such orders were issued against Mirza Qadiyani. Mirza made some correspondence with Britishers, but, perhaps for the fear of opponents, he moved to Amritsar at his own. Dr.Basharat writes that In Amritsar Mirza Qadiani received a letter from Deputy Commissioner Ludhiana that the expel orders were for Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, not for you. You may stay at Ludhiana. Author has reproduced letter as under:-

From the court of W Chevys
Deputy Commissioner Ludhiana,

To Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Raees e Qadiyani sb Salamat,

Your letter dated yesterday was perused and heard and in response it is mentioned that subject to law, you have got the same rights available to stay at Ludhiana, as are available to other law abiding subjects of British Government.

Signature Sahib Deputy Commissioner Bahadur,
Dated 06 August 1891.
Molana Muhammad Hussain filed appeals for this discrimination at Lahore but no body heard him.

The scans

 

 

“Batalvi ka Anjam” in english as “The end of Batalvi” by Mir Qasim Ali, 1931

Intro
This book is not on alislam.org.  It is missing.  I am only posting some quotes that I found.

Page 368 footnote, https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Life-of-Ahmad-20080411MN.pdf

“Muhammad Husain had two wives and seven sons and three daughters. He himself says that they had all turned out to be thoroughly wicked and irreligious. They severed all connection with their father and some of them even conspired to kill him (Isha‘atus Sunnah, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 225, 226). In 1910 Muhammad Husain complained of his children’s wickedness to the Editor of Al-Hakam Qadian, who advised him to send the two younger ones to the Qadian school. He accepted this advice and sent them to Qadian. 

When his friends came to know of it he had to write in defence in the Ahl-e- Hadith, Amritsar, dated 25-2-1910 that the boys were well looked after and that their religious beliefs were not being interfered with. But the enemies of Ahmadas could not bear it, so they pressed Muhammad Husain to get his sons out of Qadian. At last he yielded and sent them to Rupar where they drifted into ways of profligacy. On December 1, 1912, the two boys were brought to the Anjuman Ahmadiyya, Lucknow, in a miserable state. There was a complaint and the matter came to the notice of the police and the court. The Ahmadis of Lucknow tried to wean them from their wicked way of life but with no success.

Muhammad Husain died a miserable death in the beginning of 1920 at Batala. (See Batalvi ka Anjam by Mir Qasim Ali, 1931) “

Batalvi calls Mirza Ghulam Ahmad a drunkard (1894)

Intro
Batalvi grew up with MGA and knew him well, he defended MGA all the time, however, in late 1890, MGA began calling himself as the Messiah and Batalvi was forced to abandon him.

The Quote

Maulawi Muhammad Husain of Batala wrote in the Isha‘atus-Sannah(Vol. 16). :

“”””Bhangar, makkar, fareibi, mal‘un, a‘war dajjal, abdud-darahim waddananir, jiska ilham ihtilam hai, bei-haya, bhangiyu􀄔 aur bazari shuhdu􀄔 ka sargaruh, daku, khu􀄔reiz, jis ki jama‘at badma‘sh, badkirdar,zani, sharabi, i.e., ‘raving drunkard, intriguer, swindler, accursed, the oneeyed Dajjal, slave of silver and gold, whose revelation is nothing but a seminal discharge, shameless, the ring-leader of sweepers and streetvagabonds, dacoit, murderer whose followers are scoundrels, villains, adulterers, and drunkards’. “”””

See Dard, Life of Ahmad, online edition,, page 575

Mirza Sultan Muhammad from Patti, District Lahore, married Muhammadi Begum (MGA’s niece/daughter), not MGA

Intro
Dear readers, to full understand who Mirza Sultan Muhammad from Patti is, you have to do lots of reading, this is by no means an easy subject to learn.  Nonetheless, start here.  Mirza Sultan Muhammad married MGA’s daughter/niece and MGA also predicted his death within a few years, which never happened.  Ahmadi mullahs went to the extreme of making up fake stories that Mirza Sultan Muhammad repented or apologized, or in some way was neutral in this whole matter.  However, that is a total lie.  Firstly, Mirza Sultan Muhammad served in the British military and even fought during WW-1 (1914–1918).  He was shot and survived and became a hero of sorts.  In the below we sill present lots of info….pay attention.

Ahmadiyya sources lied and told us: these were taken from alislam.org, https://www.alislam.org/library/ahmadiyya-history/prophecy-muhammadi-begum-truth/

“I have always, and still consider the late Mirza Saheb, a righteous and respected person who was a servant of Islam; who had a noble spirit and who was constant in his remembrance of God. I entertain no opposition to his followers and regret that for certain reasons, I was not able to have the honour of meeting him during his lifetime.” [Tashizul Azhan: May 1913]
AND….

“At the time of the prophecy, the Arya Hindus, because of Lekh Ram and the Christians, because of Athim offered me a hundred thousand rupees to file a case against Mirza Saheb. If I had taken the amount I would have become rich but it was my great faith in him that prevented me from doing so.” 

“I declare on oath that I have such firm faith in Hazrat Mirza Saheb which I think even you, who profess to be his followers, cannot claim”
[Al Fazl: 9th June 1921]

We found the original scan of the Al-Fazl of June 9th, 1921

3 years later, Mirza Sultan Muhammad was tracked down and he clarified in the below

The weekly Ahl-i-hadith newspaper of 1924 tells us
Weekly Ahl e Hadis Amritsar in its publication of 24th March, 1924 brought an interesting report in this regard. Urdu version of which may be seen in screen shot of weekly. English translation is as under:-

“”“Mirza Sahib Qadiani ,s each prophesy proved to be a decisive one for him. Because he always prophesied for a decision from Allah. So his prophesy regarding his heavenly wed bride was clear in its meaning but the man to whom the lady was married, was Mirza Sultan Muhammad of Patti, District Lahore. It was all important that Mirza Sahib Qadiani pays attention to him because he was the main irritant in the acquisition of his prophesied bride. Therefore, a stern time line of the death of Mirza Sultan Muhammad was prophesied which was to expire in August 1894. But when he did not die in the given time line, Mirza Qadiani starts saying that my prophesy scared Mirza Sultan which earned him extension in life. Finally Mirza Sahib Qadiani wrote that he would be a liar, if Mirza Sultan did not die in my life time. Facts are that Mirza Sahib Qadiani died in 1908, but Mirza Sultan is still alive. During a debate at Sikandarabad, Qadiani Muballigh Abdur Rehman Desi Misri stated that Mirza Sultan had written a letter to Mirza Sahib Qadiani assuring him that he (Mirza Sultan) considers him a saintly person. Although this writing do not affect the prophesy in any manner, yet Mirza Sultan was asked of this, he verbally replied he has never been a believer of Mirza sb Qadiani. On request he wrote the following text:- When Mirza Qadiani announced my death prophesy I never thought it to be true nor I was scared of it. I have always been and am a follower of my elders of Islam to this day.”””

Signature 
Sultan Muhammad Baig Resident of Patti dated 30-03-1924.
Witnesses
Molvi Abdullah Imam Masjid Mubarak
Molvi Ahmadullah sb Amritsari 
Molvi Mola Bakhsh Khateeb Jama Masjid patti Distt Lahore.
Molvi Abdul Majeed Rasheed Resident of Patti.
Mistari Muhammad Hussain Naqsha Nawees Patti.

The scan

Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi has also confirmed from Mirza Sultan Muhammad thru one of his relative whether he has given Qadianis any such writing in their favour, he denied it

 

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Dr Mirza Yaqub Baig–who became a Lahori-Ahmadi in 1914

Intro
This is an interesting story about MGA and Dr. Mirza Yaqub Baig.  This was the doctor who treated Lekh Ram at the Mayo Hospitol in 1897, Lekh Ram died, mostly likely because the Ahmadi doctor allowed him to die.  See here:

In 1897, Lekh Ram is murdered and the the doctors assistance is an Ahmadi
Lekh Ram was eventually murdered in 1897.  Batalvi urged the govt. to search MGA’s house. MGA seemed to have inside information on how Lekh ram died, this seems to have startled the entire Punjaab.  However, the inside story was that Lekh Ram was taken to the Mayo Hospitol in Lahore after getting stabbed, and the Doctors-assistant who was working that night just so happened to be an Ahmadi.  Mirza Yaquub Beg was the young Ahmadi doctor and he shared all of the info with MGA, in terms of where Lekh Ram was stabbed and etc.  And he boasted and gloated and was happy that Lekh Ram died (see pages 10-14).  Also See the ROR of 1984 for the story.

The story

“The heartfelt connection which the Promised Messiah had with me is known to everyone familiar with those times. When I took the final medical exam [to become a medical doctor] in 1897, he prayed for me, and received a revelation: ‘You have passed.’ Upon this, he said to me, and even wrote it in Haqiqat-ul-Wahy,: ‘As there is very close relationship between me and Yaqub Baig, this is why I have been addressed in the revelation [as ‘you’] whereas Yaqub Baig is meant.’

Then the affection and kindness of the late Maulana Nur-ud-Din, khalifat-ul-Masih, is known to everyone, that he always considered me as his son. From the beginning of our connection he addressed me as ‘son’. He maintained this relationship till the end. During his last illness, he would not take food or milk from anyone’s hand except mine or that of Maulvi Sadr-ud-Din. And it is the grace of Allah that the very last sip he took was honey by my hand.

As to the late Maulvi Abdul Karim, it was the Promised Messiah himself who designated me as his brother, and Maulvi Abdul Karim treated me with fraternal affection till he breathed his last.

I cannot sufficiently thank Allah that He, the Almighty, provided me with so much opportunity to serve all these three elders during their lifetimes, and at the time of their final, fatal illness Allah granted me to serve them as their medical doctor.” (Paigham Sulh, 22 August 1917, p. 5)

Note that it is not in Haqiqat-ul-Wahy, as stated above, but in his book Nuzul-ul-Masih (p. 223, Ruhani Khaza’in, v. 18, p. 601) that Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad mentions his revelation about Dr Mirza Yaqub Baig as ‘You have passed’.

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid
#Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Up ↑