Search results


Ahmadiyya persecution rates from 1889 to 1939–Only 12 Ahmadi’s killed in 50 years?

Ahmadi’s are lying when they claim that they are being persecuted. The stats prove the opposite. Most Ahmadi’s don’t read and do research, they simply believe whatever it is that their mullahs tell them. In the first 50 years of Ahmadiyya, not a single Ahmadi was murdered for his faith in British-India. There were only 12 Ahmadi’s who were allegedly killed for being Ahmadi in the first 50 years of Ahmadiyya. 4 of these were Ahmadi’s who were doing tabligh in Afghanistan and officially employees of MGA and his sons. In fact, 11 of the 12 were killed in Afghanistan. 1 Ahmadi was killed in Iraq in 1925, however, we have never seen any details. Based on this data, we conclude that only 4 Ahmadi’s were killed for their faith in the first 50 years of Ahmadiyya. We also conclude that there was no persecution at all.


Jun 20, 1901 Hazrat Moulvi Abdur Rehman Sahib Kabul Afghanistan
Jul 14, 1903 Hazrat Sahibzada Abdul Lateef Sahib Kabul Afghanistan
1917 Sahibzada Mohammad Saeed Jan Sahib Kabul Afghanistan
1917 Mohammad Omer Jan Sahib Kabul Afghanistan
1918 Syed Sultan Ahmad Sahib Kabul Afghanistan
1918 Syed Hakeem Ahmad Sahib Kabul Afghanistan
Aug 31, 1924 Moulvi Naimatullah Khan Sahib Kabul Afghanistan
Feb 05, 1925 Moulvi Abdul Haleem Sahib Kabul Afghanistan
Feb 05, 1925 Qari Noor Ali Sahib Kabul Afghanistan
Jan 16, 1935 Sheikh Ahmad Furqani Sahib Baghdad Iraq
Feb 15, 1939 Wali Dad Khan Sahib Afghanistan
Feb 15, 1939 Son of Wali Dad Khan Sahib Afghanistan


Links and Related Essay’s

Click to access

#ahmadiyyapersecutionisfake #thereisnoahmadiyyapersecution
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Sialkot #Mosqueattack

The most accurate list of Ahmadiyya census numbers from 1889 to 2006

Ahmadi’s lie all the time, they are taught to behave as such per the Mirza families process of brainwashing. The common Ahmadi’s go on wikipedia and find the inaccurate data about #Ahmadis being the fastest growing sect of Muslims by 2001 by the World Christian Encyclopedia. However, that is a bold face lie, my team and I ordered this book and opened it and realized that the World Christian Encyclopedia said no such thing, they had only listed a graph which inaccurately gave a number of Ahmadi’s from 1920–2001, furthermore, watch my video, it proves that another group of Muslims were the fastest growing group of Muslims per the World Christian Encyclopedia, not Ahmadi’s. Furthermore, this encyclopedia gives no references at all, thus, it is not a good source of information.

Ahmadiyya sources claim that there 40 people who did a bait with MGA in 1889 in Ludhiana, however, the original register of bait’s went mysteriously missing.

MGA claims to have 313 members only, however, he didn’t count his wife and kids (See Dard, page 844).

MGA was claiming 7,000 followers in an announcement, see Hani Tahir’s video.  The announcement is only found in Majmua Ishtiharat, no other piece of Ahmadi literature has regurgitated this announcement.

In MGA’s book, “The Importance of the Imam” or “Zaroorat-ul-Imam“.  MGA reports 318 total Ahmadi’s (see page 76).  At the time he was dealing with the British authorities in terms of the famous “income-tax-case”.  MGA was eager to show his followers as very few, he was doing this as a strategy to win the case.  MGA was forced to pay 187 rupees, however, this was a Hindu officer and MGA appealed to higher authorities, a british officer was assigned to the case and MGA was given tax exempt status immediately.  MGA was above the law in British-India, anytime a Hindu judge/officer would catch MGA doing something wrong, the British would step in and absolve MGA of all wrongdoing.

1898, from a book called, “AL-BALAGH YA FARYAD-E-DARD” or “The Message or a Cry of Anguish”
This book was written in 1898 and published in english, however, it wasn’t published in urdu and arabic until 1922 (Ahmadiyya Sources).  In this book, MGA confesses to having accidentally told the British authorities that he only had 318 Ahmadi’s in his records.  MGA claims that it was the first thing that came to mind, and thus erred (See Hani Tahir’s video).  MGA then goes on to say that there are no less than 10,000 Ahmadi’s.

1901 census
Per the census, there were roughly 12,000 Ahmadi’s in India (see Griswold, 1912), out of the roughly 12,000 Ahmadi’s, 1,113 were Ahmadi’s in the Punjab, the United Provinces reported 931 Ahmadi’s and the Bombay presidency reported 10,000 Ahmadi’s (Griswold thought this number was exaggerated).  Why would there be more Ahmadi’s in the Bombay area then in the Punjab?  Thus, this number is inaccurate (see Walter, Chapter VI).

November 1902, MGA’s letter to Piggot
MGA claims to have 100,000 followers.

1903–January, from the Review of Religions, page 41
150,000 Ahmadi’s are reported by the editors, Sher Ali, Muhammad Ali and Mufti Muhammad Sadiq.

By 1904, MGA was claiming 200,000 members of Ahmadiyya (see Griswold).  In this same era, the number was advanced to 400,000.  Later on in 1991, Mirza Tahir Ahmad claimed that most of these new Ahmadi’s came from the followers of the ahmadi martyr Maulvi Abdul Latif.  Abdul Latif was from Khost, Afghanistan.  After 1906 these people were all missing, it was dubious to think of them as Ahmadi’s in the first place.

In a mysterious book named “Lecture Ludhiana”, first published in english in 2003, the original urdu version is totally missing.  MGA and his team state that every month, 2-5000 bait forms show up in Qadian, and that currently, they have 300,000 Ahmadi’s (see page 13).  Ahmadi sources claim that this was a speech of MGA in November of 1905, however, facts show something totally the opposite.

May 1906 ROR
On page 178, the growth of the Ahmadiyya Movement is discussed, they claim 300,000 Ahmadi’s in the whole world.  This article was written by Maulvi Muhammad Ali.

In the Review of Religions, January–1907 edition, page 22, in an essay about MGA entitled “The Messenger of the latter days”.  They claim nearly 300,000 Ahmadi’s.

While Mirza Nasir Ahmad was at the NA hearings of 1974, it was reported that there weren’t anymore then 18,000 total Ahmadi;’s in the whole world, which proved that either MGA was wrong for claiming 400,000 or the British government wasn’t collecting proper census data.  In the 1924 and 1959 edition of “Ahmadiyyat, the true Islam”, the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad wrote that in 1908, hundreds of thousands.  In fact, the 2007 edition of this book still says the same.  At the NA, it was shown that the British govt. had counted roughly 19,000 Ahmadi’s in 1908, when MGA died, Mirza Nasir said that this number was wrong.

ROR–July 1908
See page 257, “Ahmadi’s are not less then 300,000.  This text was actually MGA’s book, “Message of Peace” or “Pagham-e-Sulh”, which was published posthumously.  The first english edition published in Pakistan in 1968. The second edition (a completely new translation) published in UK in 1996 and the Present online edition (revised translation) published in UK in 2007.  Nevertheless, the 2007 online english edition lists 400,000 Ahmadi’s instead of the 300,000 (see page 26) that MGA supposedly wrote and its a note by the publishers, however, it doesn’t tell what the original said.

Lepel Griffin’s 3rd edition of the Punjab Chiefs was published.  It is listed on page 42, that the Ahmadiyya sect is claiming 300,000 members.

1911 census
Griswold tells us that the 1911 census shows 18,695 Ahmadi’s in the Punjab only, he doesn’t give the number for UP or Bombay residency.  This is totally in-line with the British government official records.

February 1914
The ROR of February 1914 quotes the L’ Islamisme newspaper, they write that there are 400,000 Ahmadi’s in the world (See page 77-78) in 1908, when MGA died.

October 1914
In an essay published in the ROR of Oct-1914, an Ahmadi writer writes that there are 400,000 Ahmadi’s in the world and growing rapidly.

Walter writes that there are no more then 70,000 Ahmadi’s in the world (see Chapter 6).

The Review of Religions, October and November 1919 reports that 1640 new men have joined the Ahmadiyya Movement by entering into the Bai‘at of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih but the figures are not complete, as most of those who enter into the Bai‘at by coming to Qadian are not included in the above number. The above figure represents mostly those who send written applications for admission into the Ahmadiyya movement.

1921 census
Per the NA of 1974, there were only 30,000 Ahmadi’s in the British India.  Mufti Muhammad Sadiq, in his newspaper, the Muslim Sunrise, claims 700,000 Ahmadi’s in the world(see page 20).

By 1924, the Khalifa, Mirza Basheeruddin Mahmud Ahmad was claiming 500,000 Ahmadi’s (see page 6).  “Ahmadiyya, the True Islam”, which was published before hand and in England in 1924, which followed by many urdu and english editions.  He claimed hundreds of thousands of Ahmadi’s.  Zafrullah khan read out the book, while the Khalifa watched.

Moslem Sunrise, April 1924 edition claims 700,000 Ahmadi’s
See page 67.  Maulvi Muhammad Din (the new ahmadi missionary-in-charge-USA writes that Dr. Sadiq has caused Ahmadiyya to reach 700,000.

Addison writes, “The Ahmadiya Movement and Its Western Propaganda”, via The Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Jan., 1929), pp. 1-32.  On page  3, he erroneously claims that there were 50,000 Ahmadi’s by 1911, and guesses that there are “probably”  70,000 by 1918.  He then comments that the 1921 isn’t yet available, but states that their population is decreasing.

1931 census
Per the NA of 1974, there were only 56,000 Ahmadi’s in the British India.

1934–Al Fazl, the Khalifa comments on the Ahmadiyya census, he doesn’t oppose it
In the 1974 NA questioning, Yahya Bakhtiar quoted the Al-Fazl of 1934 and showed how the Khalifa agreed to the figure of 56,000 Ahmadi’s in 1931 and 30,000 in 1921.

1935, Review of Religions, July 1935 edition
The Khalifa claims that there are more than 56,000 Ahmadi’s in the whole world (see page 243).

1950-Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad comments on Ahmadi’s inflating their census
The Khalifa claims to have 200k Ahmadi’s in Pakistan and 400k at the most including outside of Pakistan.  He also laments over why Ahmadi’s keep inflating their numbers to each other.

1954–500k Ahmadi’s are reported in the entire world
During the 1954 Munir Enquiry, Ahmadiyya sources reported that there were 500,000 Ahmadi’s in the entire world.  Of which half are in Pakistan.

1960–From the encyclopedia of Islam
Ahmadiyya leadership reported 500k Ahmadi’s in the whole world with about half in Pakistan.  This came from the number that was given during the Munir Enquiry.

The Khalifa dies.  The Ahmadiyya census topic has a new manager, the new Khalifa, Mirza Nasir Ahmad.

In a speech at the annual Jalsa, Mirza Nasir Ahmad told the Ahmadi’s of Rabwah that there were 10 million Ahmadi’s in the world.  In a Friday Khutbah by Mirza Tahir Ahmad (MTA) in 1991, MTA claims that before he dies, he vows to make the communities membership to swell to 10 million and thus correct the error by Mirza Nasir Ahmad.

May of 1974, during a Friday Sermon, the Khalifa claims 10 million Ahmadi’s, with 4 million in Pakistan alone
After Azad Kashmir declared Ahmadi’s as a non-Muslim minority, the Khalifa openly lied.

1974-Mirza Nasir Ahmad in 1974 at the NA claimed 10 million Ahmadi’s in the world

The Moslem Sunrise tells us that there are 10 million Ahmadi’s in the whole world, see page 9.

Mirza Tahir Ahmad becomes Khalifa and immediately tours Europe, Canada and the USA.

The March-1984 issue of the Moslem Sunrise reports 10 million Ahmadi’s worldwide (see page 25).

For the 100-year Jubilee, Mirza Tahir Ahmad made sure that all Ahmadiyya sources of information (books and magazines) kept giving the Ahmadiyya global membership number as 10 million, 1 crore in Urdu.  However, this was a total lie, by 1991, Mirza Tahir Ahmad was acknowledging that his brother lied about this very topic in 1969 when he claimed 10 million Ahmadi’s then and there at a Jalsa (see the Foreward).  Even the Review of Religions was claiming that there were 10 million in the world by 1989 (See page 4).

Mirza Tahir Ahmad gives an entire Friday Sermon on the topic of the Global Ahmadiyya membership number.  He indirectly admits that his brother (the Khalifa, mirza nasir Ahmad) lied about having 10 million Ahmadis (1 crore) in 1969.  Mirza Tahir Ahmad also indirectly admitted to not having 10 million Ahmadis, since in this speech he prays to have 10 million Ahmadi’s in his membership before he dies.

Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s famous book, “Islam’s response to Contemporary Issues” was published.  This book was actually a lecture that Mirza Tahir Ahmad did in the early part of 1990.  Nevertheless, in the “about the author” section, it is claimed that Mirza Tahir Ahmad has 10 million Ahmadis with him.

204,308 converts per Ahmadiyya sources (see the cover page).  This number will double every year for the next 8 years.  If we work the numbers backwards, we have roughly 9.6 million Ahmadi’s.

421,753 converts to Ahmadiyya are reported.  Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s famous book, “Christianity,
A Journey from Facts to Fiction” was published.  There is an “About the Author” section, just like in his previous book, in fact, it is a total copy of that.  This book was republished with the same “about the author” section in 1996, 1997 and the current 2006 online edition.  However, they were claiming 15 million Ahmadi’s by 1997.  If we work that backwards, we have roughly 9.8 million Ahmadi’s total.

847,726 converts to Ahmadiyya are reported.  Roughly 10.5 million Ahmadi’s by implication.

1,662,721 converts to Ahmadiyya are reported.  12 million total Ahmadi’s, by implication.

3,004,575 converts to Ahmadiyya are reported.  15 million total.  If you work the numbers backwards, they were claiming 15 million converts total, that means that there were 12 million total Ahmadi’s in 1996.

In fact, in June of 1998, the USA Jamaat published a souvenir, 50th-USA-Jalsa booklet, which was celebrating the 50th Jalsa Salana in the USA.

5,004,591 converts to Ahmadiyya are reported.

10,820,226 converts to Ahmadiyya are reported.

41,308,376 converts to Ahmadiyya are reported.

81,007,361 converts to Ahmadiyya are reported.


200 million total Ahmadi’s are officially reported.  2 books by Mirza Tahir Ahmad are published posthumously, in the preface area, 10 million Ahmadi’s are written only.  This seems to be a copy and paste job from his previous books, since it is identical.

This pie chart was on the official Ahmadiyya website, showing ridiculous conversion numbers, it was officially removed in 2006.

Related Essays and links

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

#worldchristianencyclopedia #worldchristianencyclopedia2001
worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001
worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001
worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001 worldchristianencyclopedia worldchristianencyclopedia2001

MGA’s failure to speak at the Aligarh College in April-May of 1889

As we all know, MGA never gave any public lectures in his whole life, before 1889 or after.  MGA always had a follower of his read out these ready made speeches, which were written by MGA’s team of writers.  The main reason that MGA never did public speeches or Friday Sermons or etc was because he spoke with a terrible stutter.  In fact, MGA’s team went out of their way to fabricate speeches that MGA might have given, like Khutba Ilhamia and other talks at the annual Jalsa’s at Qadian.  Even before Khutbah Ilhamia, MGA never led any Eid prayer, he would simply get up to speak and say a few words after the main speech, see MGA’s Eid of 1888.  Nevertheless, after accepting Bait’s from his followers in March of 1889, MGA immediately traveled to Aligarh and was scheduled to give a speech to many Professor’s, Sir Syed would also be in attendance.  However, after MGA arrived in Aligarh, he never came out of his apartment for daily prayers, then, just a few hours before his speech, he declined and abruptly left for Qadian.  This was before Noorudin and Maulvi Abdul Karim had began giving speeches on MGA’s behalf.  They had just taken his Bait however.  Mir Abbas Ali Ludhianvi, Maulvi Abdullah Sanori and Sheikh Hamid Ali accompanied him on this journey (see Mujadid-e-Azim, page 278).  MGA stayed in Aligarh for just a week, after which he returned to Ludhiana. In Aligarh, he was the guest of Tafazul Hussain, Tehsildar, who was at the time serving as the Superintendent of the Deputy Commissioner’s office. There were a couple of report-worthy incidents in Aligarh (IBID).  The name of the speech was supposed to be “The Truth of Islam”.

1890, MGA’s account of this event in Fath-e-Islam
“”””Once I had the occasion to travel to Aligarh at a time when my mind was tired. I had also suffered from this weakness some time earlier in Qadian and I was not in a fit condition
to carry on long conversations or to undertake any intellectual effort…. In Aligarh, while I was in this condition, a Maulavi of the name of Muhammad Isma‘il came to see me and humbly requested me to deliver a sermon…. I accepted his request with pleasure and had in mind to speak in regular public about the essence of Islam…But thereafter God the Almighty dissuaded me from this effort. 

I am sure that as I was not in good health, God the Almighty did not desire that I should suffer some ill consequence from making an intellectual effort and that is why He stopped me from delivering the sermon. On a previous occasion, I had a similar experience.

While I was physically in a weak condition, I saw one of the past Prophets in a vision and he said to me with sympathy and goodwill, ‘Why do you do such hard mental work; if you continue, you will fall ill.’”””” [Fat-he Islam, pp. 27–28 footnote, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 3, pp. 17–18](see also, the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, pages, 219-219).

Sir Syed Ahmad Khan then makes fun of MGA
See Dard, pages 215-216, footnotes:

“”””Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan also made Ahmadas the target of his ridicule in his vanity and conceit. He offered to become his disciple and then go to Hyderabad where Ahmadas should show some of his false miracles and he would go round singing his praises. Then the State in its simplicity would give Rs. 10,000 out of which Sir Sayyid would have two-thirds and onethird
would be Ahmad’sas.

It is curious indeed to note here that Sir Sayyid was later on stricken
with sorrow and grief when he and his college suffered a loss of Rs. 1,05,490/- through Sham Bihari Lal. The shock nearly killed him. When Ahmadas knew from God that Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan was approaching death he invited him to accept the truth by means of an Ishtihar dated
March 12th, 1897, but the world was too much with him. He had even discontinued offering the Salat and observing the fasts.”””

Who was Maulvi Muhammad Ismael?
MGA and other Ahmadiyya sources tell us that MGA was in Aligarh already when this Muslim Maulvi approached MGA and asked him to give a speech.  MGA agreed, however, MGA and other Ahmadiyya sources tell us that MGA was prevented by his GOD to give them speech, and thus he reneged.  However, the truth is that MGA was incapable.  Nevertheless, Maulvi Muhammad Ismael seems to have engaged MGA in some type of Mubahila contest.  He even wrote a book against MGA in 1889.  This might be the first instance of MGA conducting a Mubahila challenge with another Muslim.

Maulvi Muhammad Ismael was a liberal Maulvi who’s friend had visited MGA at Qadian and he says:

“Syed Ahmad Arab, who is my trusted friend, narrated to me, ‘I stayed with Hazrat Mirza in the company of a group of his trusted friends…and discovered that he possesses astrological
instruments that he puts to his use.’”

In response to this charge, MGA challenged Maulvi Muhammad Ismail of Aligarh to a
mubahalah.  MGA wrote:

“I have no recollection of any Syed Ahmad who stayed with me for two months. The onus of producing this person is on Maulvi sahib so that we can ask him face to face what instruments he has seen with me. There is really no need for an Arab, or non- Arab, to give evidence in this matter. I am still alive, so why don’t you, Maulvi sahib, come and stay with me for two months and see for yourself?” (see Mujadid e Azim again).

Ahmadiyya sources tell us that Maulvi Muhammad Ismael died a short while after
We have not confirmed this as of yet, however, Ahmadiyya sources should never be trusted.  Nevertheless, we have reported what they wrote.

Seeratul Mahdi on the Aligarh situation of 1889
At page no 72 of his book Seeratul Mahdi Vol-1, Bashir Ahmad writes that Hazrat sb went to Aligarh in 1889.  Abdullah Sinauri, Shaikh Hamid Ali and Mir Abbas Ludhianvi were with him. People in Aligarh arranged a lecture of Hazrat sb for which his approval was obtained in advance. An Ishtihar was published giving date, time and venue of the Lecture. When everything was ready and the time of Lecture came near, Hazrat sb refused to deliver the lecture by saying that Allah has stopped him from delivering this lecture. The organisers insisted and said, huzur cancellation of lecture would bring humiliation to us. But Hazrat sb remained firm and said he will not go against the will of God. So he stayed there for about seven days but did not deliver lecture.

The scan from Seeratul Mahdi

Links and Related Essays

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

The first Bait form in Ahmadiyya included an oath of loyalty to the British Government (1889 to 1906)

Its no secret, MGA and his family enjoyed British support, since MGA’s father, brother and uncles helped them put down the great mutiny of 1857. In fact, after MGA died, the British government funded and built a huge building for Ahmadiyya in Qadian and for free!!!! In today’s money it would be half a million US dollars. At the time, this was the biggest building in Qadian, nowadays it is home to the Sikh College. In 1915, the Review of Religions published an article about MGA and his place among the prophets, they also declared that ALL Ahmadi’s must have loyalty to the British, or they will be kicked out of Ahmadiyya (see page 45).

Ahmadi’s abandoned this college as they left in 1947, it was re-established at Qadian in March of 1948 by the Sikhs. Nevertheless, MGA began accepting Bait’s in March of 1889, however, his own wife didn’t accept nor did any of his children. In 1906, Muhammad Ali wrote a famous essay in the ROR of May-1906 wherein he listed the 10 conditions of Bait. However, by 1948, Dard in his famous book about the life of MGA denied that this 4th condition ever existed in a different format.  Furthermore, the first Bait form is totally tampered with by the Mirza family and thus totally missing.

On January 12th, 1889, MGA published an announcement with the 10 conditions of Bait
This announcement is totally missing.  However, 8-9 years later he admitted that loyalty to the British was the 4th condition (see the scan in the below).  We are unsure when it was taken out and deleted. Dard tells us that this was the same day that MGA’s son, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad was born (see Dard, pages 201-208).

By 1906, the 4th condition was totally edited
In 1906, Muhammad Ali wrote a famous essay in the ROR of May-1906 wherein he listed the 10 conditions of Bait (see page 198). The 4th condition was not loyalty to the British, instead it was “””Fourthly, that he shall in no way harm God’s creatures in general and Muslims in particular under the influence of his passions— neither with his hands, nor with his tongue, nor by any other means.””””

The scan from the ROR of 1906

1948, Dard writes that the 4th condition is 
“””Fourthly, that he shall in no way harm God’s creatures in general and Muslims in particular under the influence of his passions— neither with his hands, nor with his tongue, nor by any other means.””””

Dard seems to quote the announcement of January 1889
This is very odd.  Dard totally ignores what MGA wrote in Kitab ul Barriyya and seems to quote the announcement of Jan 1889.  This is a total lie by Dard, he knew that this wasn’t the first list of conditions, however, he was most likely pressured to cover this up, since the headquarters of Ahmadiyya had just moved to the semi-independent-puppet-state called Pakistan.

Dr. Basharat Ahmad in Mujadid-e-Azim skips the entire topic of any Bait form
Interestingly enough, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s don’t ever mention any Bait Form at all.

In 1897, MGA published conditions for bait form in Kitab ul Barriya

In this book, MGA goes into detail about when he was born (1839 or 1840) and the services that his family rendered to the British Government, especially in 1857.  We have archived many of the court statements that were recorded in that book herein.

Quotes from Kitab ul Barriyah
“”””It has been proven from my continuous seventeen year long speeches that I am faithful and sincere to the English Empire from the core of my heart and soul. I am the son of a father who was also a friend to this Government. My faith is to obey this Government and love the people; These are the conditions set for my devotees and followers who take the oath of allegiance to me. I have stressed this clause under the fourth item of my pamphlet Shuroo-al-Baiat (oath of faith) which has been distributed among my devotees and followers.””””
(Kitab-ul-Barriah, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 13, P. 10; Kitab-ul-Barriha, P. 9, Supplement)

The scans

The Lahori-Ahmadi’s have published an abridged english translation of Kitab ul Barriya, but left out the bait form
In an interesting development, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s, led by Zahid Aziz have published an abridged english translation of this book, however, they left out the bait form.  This isn’t the first time they have done this, they did the same with Khutbah Ilhamiya and Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya.

The review of Religions, 1915, on loyalty to the British, or you can’t be an Ahmadi

The flattery towards the British government last all of MGA’s life, and in fact, it was Ahmadiyya policy until they moved to Pakistan in 1947
Another example is that of MGA’s book, Roohani Khazyian 15- page 114 – Chapter Sitara Qaisera, which translates into english as: “The Star of Victoria” and is a 16 page pamphlet published in 1899.  In this book, MGA says:


The scan work

Links and Related Essays

Click to access talimul.pdf

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Nusrat Jehan Begum and other women didn’t get into to MGA’s bait in 1889 and after–were they illiterate?

It seems that women weren’t allowed to take MGA’s bait? Either that or they were illiterate and unable to sign their names on a paper. Its most likely both, in 1889, no women took MGA’s bait.  In 1896, MGA published a list of 313 sahabis, some men are listed as with wife, for example, Noorudin is listed (with wife), and thus moves the number to 314, and that upsets what MGA and his team were working on, i.e. a parallel to the amount of Muslims that Muhammad (saw) had early on, if they would have added the women, the number would have swelled to 400+. Further Nusrat Jehan says that since she was with MGA, i.e. married to him, she was always in his bait.

In the below, we present a reference from Seeratul Mahdi, wherein Nusrat Jehan Begum admits that she never came under MGA’s bait, nor did any other women it seems.  We are not sure when the Ahmadiyya Khalifa’s began accepting bait from women.

The quote
pdf page 22 of 296
Narration no. 20

“My mother narrated to me that mgaq took his first bai’t (oath of allegience) at Ludhiana. First day 40 men took bai’t and when He came back some women took bai’t. First of all Molvi Noordin took bait. Humble one asked WHEN DID YOU TAKE BAI’T? MOTHER SAID, IT IS KNOWN THAT I DELAYED MY BAI’T AND TOOK IT AFTER MANY YERAS. THIS IS WRONG….RATHER I NEVER SEPARATED FROM HIM (mgaq) AND ALWAYS STAYED WITH HIM AND RIGHT FROM THE START, I CONSIDERED MYSELF IN THE BAI’T AND NEVER FELT THE NEED FOR SEPARATE BAIT”

The scan

Links and Related Essays


#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s rules on Mubahila from 1889-1890-1891

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a raging lunatic. He would issue his death threats randomly and while under British protection. In this specific case, we have caught MGA giving out some rules for his twisted ideas on Mubahila’s. Firstly, Mubahila is not a way for any Muslim to act with another Muslim. In the 1400 years after Muhammad (saw)…there were scarcely any Mubahila’s between Muslims and non-muslims. MGA seems to have opened this topic and deviated from Islam.  Nonetheless, enjoy the quote.

The Ahmadi cleric, Rizwan, @Rizwan1770,, 

I engaged with him recently, he really has an arrogance problem. Nevertheless, as I tried to get some information out of him, I quickly realized that he was a competitor, he is trained in competitive speech, not honest speech. He asked me what religion I was and then tailored a response based on that.  However, that is incorrect, I asked him about what MGA wrote on Mubahila, instead he quoted MGA’s grandson, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, who gave an incomplete answer in Canada in the 90’s.  Rizwan wrote: “”””I don’t understand the reason why the fourth Khalifa is not a valid reference for you but the second Khalifa is a valid reference for you. The statement in the audio is the position of Jama’at Ahmadiyya. If you want to know the position of the Jama’at, that is it. If you are a Ghair Mubai’ Ahmadi then I would explain the position of the Promised Messiah (as). If you are a non-Ahmadi Muslim then I would explain the concept from the Qur’an and Ahadith. If you are an atheist then I would explain God’s attribute of accepting prayers.”””

But he doesn’t understand what original research is, since he has never done it.

The quote
“Let it be clear to the readers that Mr. Abdul Haqq had asked for a mubahila. But I cannot understand how a mubahila could be permissible regarding those matters of difference which do not make either party into a kafir or an unjust one. It is clear from the Holy Quran that in a mubahila each party must believe that the party opposite is a liar, i.e., is deliberately deviating
from the truth, and is not merely mistaken, so that each side is able to say: ‘May the curse of Allah be upon the liars!’ Now if Mr. Abdul Haqq considers me to be a liar due to his wrong
judgment, I do not call him a liar but believe him to be in error, and it is not allowable to curse a Muslim who is merely in error.” (Izala Auham, p. 637).

In 1889, MGA seems to have issued a little known Mubahila to Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi.

MGA’s mubahila with Abdul Haqq begins.

The British government orders MGA to stop doing Mubahila’s.

MGA claims that Muhammad (Saw) had a Mubahila with Abu Jahl.

Maulvi Sanaullah refuses to get into a Mubahila vs. MGA, since it is un-islamic.

Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s open Mubahila to any Muslim who opposes Ahmadiyya. Bashir Ahmad Misri responds.

Links and Related Essays

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam #mubahila #mubahilainahmadiyya

Ahmadiyya leadership lied about the First Bait ceremony in 1889

Ahmadiyya mullahs have been lying on behalf of the Mirza family for over 100 years.  In this specific case, they themselves cant figure out the exact date for the first ever Bait ceremony in 1889.  The reference is to the Muslim Herald magazine, which was an Ahmadiyya magazine. Its from Aug–1971.  Obviously, Ahmadis made many errors in their writings, and then attempted a clean up for the next 50 years.  And they continue to do so…Ahmadis engage in cleanup work all over social media as they defend the Mirza family and live their lives simply for the betterment of the Mirza family.

First-Initiation   —–Muslim Herald Magazine 1971

Some interesting points to note
1.  MGA had a toilet attendant by the name of Shaikh Hamid Ali (see page 9). It seems that Sanoori was also there and MGA had a few toilet attendants in those days.

2. Seeratul-Mahdi, the 1st edition, was published on Dec 10th-1923, the second edition was published on November 14th, 1935.

3.  Maulvi Abdul Karim Sialkoti took MGA’s bait in 1889 (se page 13), later Ahmadiyya records lied about this (mirza bashir ahmad lied), most likely because Maulvi Abdul Karim Sialkoti was a ghost writer and speech giver, in place of MGA, or on MGA’s behalf.  Ahmadiyya leadership seems to have tried to cover up this fact.  (see page 13 of the Muslim herald–1971).  Shaikh Yacub Ali Irfani was also there, however, he didn’t accept MGA at that point.  He seems to have officially joined Ahmadiyya in 1897.

Some additional scans

Links and Related Essays

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Who is Pir Sirajul Haq Nu’mani (1855—1935)?

Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘mani was a close companion of MGA, he was the brother-in-law of Maulvi Rashid Ahmad Gangohe (See Mujadid e Azim, abridged english version) and came from a family of Pirs, he even tried to arrange a written debate between MGA and Gangohe, but MGA would not do a oral debate. He would regularly massage MGA’s back, legs and neck (see Tadhkirah) he permanently moved to Qadian in 1882 and became a toilet attendant of MGA and main scribe (1882–1900 era). It seems that before 1889, sometimes, Pir Sirajul Haq Nu’mani would lead the prayers in Masjid Mubarak (since MGA never led prayers) and one time read out a Persian poem about MGA after Ruku. He was a worker around Qadian in the 1901 era (see Dard). Al-Bushra, an old manuscript, which seems to have been an unpublished collection of revelations that were collected by a close companion of MGA named Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘mani. Parts of it are still written in the 2009 online edition of Tadkhirah. On the title page, it says Manzoor Elahi special Assistant of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani has compiled all of his revelations from the day of his appointment to the day of his death, during the khilafat of Molvi Nooruddin and published it from Qadian in Jan 1914. He wrote an early biography on MGA in 1915 called Tadhkiratul Mahdi. He also seems to have had a nephew which was a she-male and even has a picture with MGA.

Per Dard he is born (see page 818).

He came to Qadian bare-footed (no shoes).


Pir Sirajul Haq Nu‘mani writes: “”I presented myself before the Promised Messiah(as) in 1882 and remained in his presence until a few months prior to his demise. I always found the Promised Messiah(as) compliant to the observance of congregational prayer. (Tadhkiratul Mahdi, pp.70).””

ref. seeratu mehdi vol. 3
pdf page 146 of 316
narration 707

“Dr Mir M. Ismail narrated to me that once in summer, Maghrib prayers in Musjid Mubarak were led by Pir Siraj Ul Haq. mgaq was also present in the prayer. In third rakaat after ruku, instead of popular prayers, he read a persian poem of mgaq. The first verse of which is ‘Oh God, O solver of my hardship’.”

He was present in Ludhiana during the first ever Bait ceremony, in fact, he was the scribe who wrote the names down. He did not do bait at this time, he wanted to do his bait in Qadian and thus waited a few months and did his bait to MGA. He evcn proposed the Ahmadiyya for MGA’s new sect, however, the name wasnt taken up until 1900.

In Delhi, he was with MGA during the debate with Maulvi Syed Nazeer Hussain. He was also present during the debate with Muhammad Bashir Bhopali. He was seated on the stage at the first ever Jalsa Salana in Qadian (see Mujadid e Azim).

He was present at the famous debate with Athim.

He seems to be mentioned in the first 313 Ahmadi’s of 1896. However, his name is written as Sahibzada Muhammad Sirajul Haq, Jamali, Nu‘mani, Qadiani, Sarsavi (with wife) (see Dard).

He is mentioned in MGA’s book, (Tohfa-e-Qaisariyyah), his name is written as Sahibzadah Sirajul-Haque Jamali Nu‘mani—Son of the Late Shah Habeebur- Rahman, Sajjaadah Nasheen
Chahar Qutb Hansawi, presently visiting Qadian.

He was a worker around Qadian (see Dard).

The book, Al-Bushra, an old manuscript, which seems to have been an unpublished collection of revelations that were collected by a close companion of MGA named Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘mani. Parts of it are still written in the 2009 online edition of Tadkhirah. On the title page, it says Manzoor Elahi special Assistant of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani has compiled all of his revelations from the day of his appointment to the day of his death, during the khilafat of Molvi Nooruddin and published it from Qadian in Jan 1914.

He sides with the family of MGA and remains in Qadian as a Qadiani-Ahmadi.

He writes an early biography on the life of MGA called Tadhkiratul Mahdi.

He is mentioned by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad in his book “Aenas Sadaqat” (in english as Truth about the Split).

Per Dard (see page 818).

Links and Related Essay’s

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

RAFFA in the quran, a historical perspective

Based on context, most words in any language change meanings. For example, in the quran, the word RAFFA is used to explain how Allah physically lifted Esa (as) (see 4:158 and 3:55) up to heaven (towards himself). RAFFA in 4:158 and 3:55 means the same as RAFFA in 19:57 in terms of the Prophet Idris (as) aka Enoch (as). In 19:57, Allah told Muslims that the story of Enoch (as) ascending to heaven is in-fact a true story, and thus, allah validated that story from the bible. #ahmadis are told by their mullahs that RAFFA in 4:158 means the same as RAFFA in 43:32, which means the raising in ranks, not a literal raising. In the below, we have found 27 verses of the Quran which have the letters RF, they are explained in the below. 10 times, RAFFA is used to explain a physical lifting and 16 times it used to explain a figurative raising (in ranks or status). I have also written a detailed study on KTM (khatam) in the quran. Interestingly, in 1884, in the BA-4, MGA translated RAFFA as physical lifting towards Allah.

RAFFA in the quran as a physical lifting or something raised above the earth
There are about 10 verses of the quran which speak of a physical lifting or heaven being raised above the earth or raising the walls of a building, or high up on a mountain (where Musa went), they are 2:127, 3:55, 4:154, 4:158, 13:2, 17:49, 19:57, 55:7, 79:28 and 88:18.

RAFFA in the Quran as a figurative raising of ranks
There are 16 verses in the quran wherein RAFFA is used to explain a raising in ranks or some other figurative raising in staus, they are: 2:253, 6:165, 6:83, 7:176, 12:76, 12:100, 24:36, 34:34, 35:10, 40:15, 43:23, 43:32, 58:11, 80:14, 88:13 and 94:4.

RAFFA in the Quran in terms of angels raising us after we die

Links and Related Essay’s


#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian #raffa

Up ↑