Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"1911"

Piggot was mentioned in the ROR of 1911

Intro
The Piggot prophecy was another failed prophecy of MGA, in fact, all of his prophecies failed.  MGA and his team of writers asserted Piggot would die in front of MGA’s eyes, i.e. in MGA’s lifetime.

The Full English-RoR for 1911
reviewreligionsenglish1911

Remember to read the index, lots of clues there.

The ROR of June 1911, pages 250-251

“”””His enemies, who did their best to bring him to nought, met with dismal failure in all of their base pursuits.  One Lekh Ram of the Lahore Ayra Samaj dared to stand against him, but was crushed to death by the deadweight of his own insolence.  His own invectives and anathemas fell upon him like a stab and consigned him to eternal doom.  He was not the only victim of the Prophet’s righteous wrath, but many others suffered the same fate.  Abdullah Atham (Athim) who entered the lists against him in a religious contest was miserably worsted in the presence of a number of his respectable co-religionists, but at last the dogged pertinacity and the wilful perversity of the former proved fatal to him.  Quite recently the Christian Europe and the New World were shaken by the arrogant pretensions of Mr. Piggot and Dr. Dowie.  Both of the false pretenders soon raised a tempest in the teapot.  One claimed to be God himself, and the other, rather less arrogant claimed to be the fore-runner of Christ.  At once wicked and blasphemous were their pretensions, the Prophet of India, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian could not let them alone.  He took time by the forelock and challenged the false claimants to make good their pretensions or prepare to die.  The bubbles speedily burst and the hubbub instantaneously subsided.  Disgrace overtook both and sent one to the grave unregretted, and the other to the fathomless abyss of oblivion.  It served them right and the world was well rid of them.  Thus we saw with these very eyes how faithfully God sided with his righteous servant.  Nature in all its totality was placed at his service and success attended him wherever he turned his face””””

The scan work

 

The Khalifa visited London in 1924, and never asked about Piggot
Another quick point to make.  In 1924, the Khalifa famously went to London, however, he seems to have never inquired as to the status of the Piggot, who living less than 50 miles from the London Mosque.  Piggot was living good in those days.

Akber C and Ak Shaikh discuss another case of Ahmadiyya editing in Tarikh e Ahmadiyya
In this video, our friends have found a serious case of academic dishonesty.

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/in-1907-ahmadiyya-newspapers-were-still-asserting-that-piggot-would-die-before-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/04/piggot-was-mentioned-by-the-ahmadiyya-newspaper-review-of-religions-in-1903/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/26/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-initial-writings-to-piggot-in-1902/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1911.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/20/dear-ahmadiyya-but-dr-alexander-dowie-changed-his-claims-after-mgas-death-challenge/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/abdullah-athim-never-repented-ahmadiyya-leadership-lied/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/fate-of-a-false-prophet-by-syed-hasanat-ahmad-the-review-of-religions-august-1984/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/16/ahmadiyya-leadership-has-been-caught-red-handed-as-they-lied-about-dr-schweisos-comments-on-piggot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-wrote-that-piggot-would-not-repent/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/22/piggot-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-the-scan-work-live-from-the-discussion-forum-on-ahmadiyya-on-fb/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/24/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-wrote-to-piggot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/17/ahmadis-editing-their-books-on-piggot/

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/5593/rev-john-hugh-smyth-pigott-his-claim-prophecy-and-end/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam #atifmian #piggot #Agapemone #pigott

“A Muslim is one who accepts all those appointed by God” by Mirza Bashir-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, April 1911

Intro
This entry is about the essay by the son of MGA, Mirza Bashir-uddin Mahmud Ahmad in his own magazine, the Tashhidhul Adhan of April 1911 (see page 91).  This is the essay that solidified the “Qadiani” concept in terms of those Muslims who have rejected Mirza Ghulam Ahmad outright.

Some quotes

1910
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/03/some-quotes-from-mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmads-magazine-tashhiz-al-ahzan/

1911
“He (Mirza Ghulam Qadiani) has regarded him as an infidel who knows him to be truthful and does not believe him in speech but has not yet entered the fold.”  (“Tashi-ul-Azhan”, 6:4, Apr. 1911, Miyan Mahmood Qadiani – “Aqaid-e-Ahmadia”, Page 108).

1913
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/08/01/prophethood-among-the-followers-of-muhammad-by-maulana-sayyid-muhammad-ahsan-of-amroha-oct-1913-in-tashhizul-azhan/

Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/20/tasheeshazul-adhan-was-a-magazine-founded-by-mahmud-ahmad-in-1913/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/20/my-beliefs-about-non-ahmadi-muslims-dated-18-august-1911-by-khwaja-kamal-uddin/

http://alhafeez.org/rashid/abuse/abuse.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/08/01/prophethood-among-the-followers-of-muhammad-by-maulana-sayyid-muhammad-ahsan-of-amroha-oct-1913-in-tashhizul-azhan/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/03/some-quotes-from-mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmads-magazine-tashhiz-al-ahzan/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/20/tashhiz-al-azhan-was-a-magazine-founded-by-mahmud-ahmad-in-1906/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

“My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin

Intro
This was the essay that was written by Khwaja Kamaluddin in the summer of 1911.  It was in response to Mirza Bashir-uddin Mahmud Ahmad’s essay, “A Muslim is one who accepts all those appointed by God” which was published in April of 1911.

This is part of a bigger essay on Takfir and the Ahmadiyya Movement
I plan to populate this with more info in the future.

Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/20/tashhiz-al-azhan-was-a-magazine-founded-by-mahmud-ahmad-in-1906/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/20/a-muslim-is-one-who-accepts-all-those-appointed-by-god-by-mirza-bashir-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-april-1911/

“”Nabi Ullah Ka Zahoor”” aka “”The Appearance of the prophet of allah”” 1911-by-muhammad-zahir-al-din—the full book

Intro
In 1911, an Ahmadi, Muhammad Zahir Al-Din wrote a book wherein he discussed the prophethood of MGA and its implications of Kufr upon the Muslims of the world.  Mahmud Ahmad quotes this book in his 1924 book, “The truth about the split” and Muhammad Ali has quoted him quite a bit also in his books vs. Mahmud Ahmad.

The full book
Nabee Allah Kaa Zahoor Mukamal

Other essays on this topic
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/04/nabi-ullah-ka-zahoor-aka-appearance-of-the-prophet-of-allah-1911-by-muhammad-zahir-al-din/

“The present Condition of Christendom calls for a prophet”—Review of Religions July 1911

Intro
This is an essay from 1911, before the prophethood of MGA was understood by Ahmadis.

See—-http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1911.pdf

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/images_blog/revrel-jul1911.pdf

Quotes

Page 288

“Who can then breathe life into this dead world of ours?  Who can bring back to this earth the faith that has departed from it?  The mere preaching of a book will not do.  None but a prophet can regenerate this earth.  Prophets have breathed life into dead humanity in the past and if the world is to be regenerated now, it must be regenerated by a prophet.  That prophet has already appeared.  It was Ahmad of Qadian……….”

On page 290

“In short, the present condition of Christendom called for a prophet.  The world was so sunk in error and vice that none but a prophet could regerate it.  It has even been a law of God to raise a prophet when vice and error have corrupted the world and it was in accordance with that law that He raised Ahmad in the present ages.  The very fact that the present age sorely needed a prophet is an evidence of his truth.  God spoke to him as He spoke to…………..”

On page 291

“…so God raised a prophet in this age…..”

The final paragraph of this article says:

“lastly Muhammad….”

“Nabi-ullah Ka Zahoor” aka “Appearance of the Prophet of Allah” (1911) by Muhammad Zahir al-Din

Intro
In 1911, an Ahmadi, Muhammad Zahir Al-Din wrote a book wherein he discussed the prophethood of MGA and its implications of Kufr upon the Muslims of the world.  Mahmud Ahmad quotes this book in his 1924 book, “The truth about the split” and Muhammad Ali has quoted him quite a bit also in his books vs. Mahmud Ahmad.  Nonetheless, this book is totally missing from all records and archives in 2016.  The book may still exist in the Khilafat Library at Rabwah or Qadian, or even in the UK.

Yohanan Friedman direct quoted this book
Friedman’s book on Ahmadiyya was published in 1985, it was published again in 1989 and then 2003.  He seems to have had access to Zahir Al-Din’s book in 1985.

The Direct Quotes
1.  “His messengers (rusuluhu) is encountered in the Quran or in a declaration of faith, Ghulam Ahmad must be considered one of them.  Belief in him is a part of Islamic faith and is, as such, necessary for the attainment of salvation (madar-i najat)” (“Nabi-ullah Ka Zahoor” aka “Appearance of the Prophet of Allah” (1911) by Muhammad Zahir al-Din, see pages 8, 71 and 99)(From Friedman, page 152, 2003 edition).  

2.  “If the Promised Messiah is rejected or considered in his claim (heaven forbid!) a liar and a cheat—the inevitable result will be the loss of prophethood of Muhammad….as well”  (“Nabi-ullah Ka Zahoor”: aka “Appearance of the Prophet of Allah” (1911) by Muhammad Zahir al-Din, see page 80)(From Friedman, page 152, 2003 edition).


Who is Mir Muhammad Ishaq (1890–1944)? The brother-in-law of MGA

Intro
Mir Muhammad Ishaq was the son of Mir Nasir Nawab, and younger brother of Nusrat Jehan Begum and Dr. Mir Muhammad Isma’il.  His date of birth is Sept 8th, 1890 in Ludhiana.  which is recorded in Nuzul ul Masih (published in 1909).  Per Ahmadiyya sources, he had totally moved to Qadian by 1894.  He lived with MGA until MGA died in 1908, he even claims to have watched MGA lead prayers for the women of the house many times, whilst standing on MGA’s side, women weren’t allowed in the mosques in Qadian in those days, he lived in this very mansion until he died in 1944.  He even accompanied MGA on his tours of Delhi, Ludhiana, Lahore and Gurdaspur in the era of 1903–1905.  At times, he even acted as MGA’s scribe, as he helped to write responses to letters and other various administrative tasks around the house at Qadian.  Ahmadiyya sources tell us that he was never scared to fight non-Ahmadi’s.  In fact, in the 1920–1930’s, he was involved in many fist-fights between Ahmadi’s and Non-Ahmadi’s (see 18:00 of this video).  He died on March 17, 1944 at age 54(see Tadhkirah, 2009 online edition, page 721).

His children
His eldest daughter was Sahibzadi Naseerah Begum.  His maternal great grand son was Sahibzada Mirza Ghulam Ahmad aka Mirza Sa’eed Ahmad.  Sahibzada Mirza Ghulam Ahmad aka Mirza Sa’eed Ahmad married Mirza Masroor Ahmad’s sister.

1898–1904
It is unclear whether or not he attended the Talim ul Islam Kids school at Qadian.  No Ahmadiyya sources give this indication.  However, he was living with MGA, and both of his siblings and his father.  The whereabouts of his mother are unknown.

1902
In 1909, Nuzul ul Masih is published and mentions a terrible dream that MGA saw about Mir Muhammad Ishaq and his mother (see Tadhkirah, page 264).  Ahmadiyya sources claim that this book was written in 1902.  This exact story was initially published in Haqiqatul Wahy, (see online english edition).

1903–1904
He accompanied MGA on his tours of Delhi, Ludhiana, Lahore and Gurdaspur.  Ishaq remembers how MGA was denied a chair in the court of this Hindu judge.

1905–May
Mir Muhammad Ishaq’s name is mentioned in the Ahmadiyya newspaper, Al-Badr.  He is referred to as Miyyan Muhammad Ishaq and he was sick, wherein MGA claims to have prayed for him and cured him miraculously (See 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, pages 720-722), (see also, [al-Hakam, vol. 9, no. 18, May 24, 1905, p. 1; Badr, vol. 1, no. 7, May 18, 1905, p. 5] and [al-Hakam, vol. 9, no. 18, May 24, 1905, p. 1; Badr, vol. 1, no. 7, May 18, 1905, p. 1]).  

February of 1906
He is married at age 16 to Salihah Bibi, daughter of Sahibzadah Pir Manzur Muhammad (see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah english, pages 789-790.  Noorudin read the wedding ceremony.  Al-Badr and Al-Hakam also published this news.  Pir Manzur Muhammad was the son of Sufi Ahmad Jan.  Noorudin and him were brother-in-laws.

1906
He helped MGA in writing down many signs which appeared in Haqiqatul Wahy.  He also walked with MGA around Qadian whenever needed.  In Haqiqatul Wahy, Sign #143 is about MIr Muhammad Ishaq, MGA also disgraced or talked bad about Ishaq’s mother (MGA’s mother-in-law), MGA accused her of allowing an enemy into MGA’s house (the enemy was Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan of Patiala.  MGA also claims that Tumours appeared on his groin on both
sides, and it became certain that it was plague, as plague had broken out in some villages of this district (see Haqiqatul Wahy, online english edition, pages 411-413).

1906–The Sadr Anjuman is created
In the lifetime of MGA, Mir Muhammad Ishaq’s elder brother is placed into the Sadr Anjuman as a voting member, even though he is busy working as an assistant Surgeon.  Mir Nasir Nawab is not made a member.

May 26th, 1908
He supported the Khilafat of Noorudin.

Early January of 1909
After the first Jalsa without MGA present, rumblings were coming from the members of the Sadr Anjuman to the effect that the “Khalifa” position was equal to the body of the Sadr Anjuman (a 14 member body).  However, Noorudin was the Khalifa and the President of the Sadr Anjuman.  Mir Muhammad Ishaq and the family of MGA posed several questions on this topic to Noorudin in an attempt for clarification.  Noorudin sent those questions to Maulvi Muhammad Ali (and remember, all of these people lived together in MGA’s house at Qadian) and (see “truth about the split”, pages 230-240, online english edition).  Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad claims to have seen a dream with Mir Muhammad Ishaq in it, wherein Mir Muhammad Ishaq is lighting a house on fire symbolically.

31st January 1909
Mir Muhammad Ishaq was present on this day and supported the Noorudin’s Khilafat and the family of MGA.  This was the famous day wherein Nooruddin tried to solve the issues of the Sadr Anjuman, i.e. the powers of the Khalifa.

1910
Ahmadiyya sources tell us that he passed the “Maulvi-Fazil” course and became an Ahmadiyya imam-proper.  However, there was no madrassa at Qadian which was qualified to produce imam’s, he was most likely grandfathered in via Noorudin.  Ishaq also claims to have learned the Quran from Noorudin.

1912
Ahmadiyya sources tell us that he became a member, however, that would only be possible if Maulvi Noorudin would have retired from the Anjuman and named a replacement.

March of 1914
Noorudin had died and Mir Muhammad Ishaq was given the job of Hospitality.

Qadiani Jalsa of 1918
The annual Qadiani-Jalsa was supposed to be held in December of 1918, however, the Khalifa was sick and it was postponed and held in March of 1919.  Many Lahori-Ahmadi’s were invited to this Jalsa and even had an opportunity to speak.  After they spoke, Mir Muhammad Ishaq gave a refutation of their arguments (see “truth about the split”, pages 210-211, online english edition).

1933
He became headmaster at Jamia Ahmadiyya at Qadian.

1940
He contracts a mystery illness, he is taken to Lahore and other places for treatment.  However, none is found, he died 4 years later.  At this point, he signed up for Wasiyyat.

1944
He died at aged 54.

 

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/18/most-of-mir-nasir-nawabs-family-were-killed-by-british-soldiers-during-the-1857-mutiny/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/24/mir-nasir-nawab-wrote-poetry-vs-mga-initially-1891-2-years-later-he-accepted-mgas-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/29/hyat-e-nasir-by-mir-nasir-nawab-the-full-pdf-book/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/08/how-mga-and-mir-nasir-nawab-met-from-seeratul-mahdi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/19/ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-the-age-of-mgas-second-wife/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-young-wife-didnt-do-parda-this-is-against-the-parda-laws-in-rabwah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/10/did-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-wife-wish-to-be-released-from-her-marriage/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/13/when-did-mgas-marriage-with-his-second-wife-nusrat-jehan-take-place-what-year/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/08/mir-nasir-nawab-the-father-in-law-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://www.alislam.org/friday-sermon/printer-friendly-summary-2018-02-09.html

https://www.alislam.org/v/2355.html

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/16/nuzul-ul-masih-or-the-descent-of-the-messiah-published-posthumously-in-1909-and-quotes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/10/what-is-the-talim-ul-islam-high-school-college-at-qadian-and-later-at-rabwah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/30/who-were-the-members-of-the-sadr-anjuman-ahmadiyya-aka-executive-body-of-control-in-1906-1911/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/10/failed-prophecy-of-mga-regarding-the-birth-of-a-son-to-miyan-manzur-muhammad-1906-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/03/04/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-lost-his-court-case-vs-karam-uddin-1904-but-won-on-appeal/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/28/who-is-sufi-ahmad-jan-of-ludhiana-aka-munshi-ahmad-jan/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 2:62, the “Salvation” or “status” of Non-Muslim’s in an islamic state?

Intro
Chapter 2 of the Quran was revealed to Muhammad just after he arrived in Medina in roughly 2 A.H. and became the General/Leader of the “greater-medina-area”.  2:62 indirectly tells us that there is NO compulsion (see 2:256 also) for any person to join Islam or serve in the military.  These verses seem to be a “peace-time” teaching of Islam.  In fact, this entire Chapter teaches Muslims how to live in a diverse environment and lays the grass-roots for the most basic Islamic teaching, justice.

MGA and his team never really commented  on 2:62 until 1906
MGA never commented on this verse, nor did any of his “ghost-writers” until Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan wrote about it in his Tafsir of the Quran in 1905, which was marketed by the ROR.  In this Tafsir, Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan wrote that belief in MGA was not necessary for any Muslim.  This is where and when MGA took up this topic and he wrote a letter to Dr. Khan explaining how his rejectors were Kafirs.  After MGA died, his sons took this up, in 1911, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad (the soon to be Khalifa) began calling Non-Ahmadi-Muslims as Kafirs and quoting MGA’s letter of 1906.  The soon-to-be-Lahori-Ahmadi’s immediately disagreed, Khwaja Kamaluddin immediately issued a response wherein he claimed the son of the founder was wrong and etc.  This question was left to Nooruddin, who was disabled mentally and physically at the time.  More controversy followed, Noorudin died without officially solving the issue.  The Split happened and this was the main issue between the two groups, prophethood was also included, Ismuhu Ahmad was also included but dropped by 1923 by the Khalifa.  The Qadiani-sect did open Takfir in those days to all Muslims and to the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.  By 1923, the Khalifa ordered Ahmadi’s to stop doing open Takfir, the Takfir went silent, and has been silent and deceptive since 1923.  However, some of the hard-core Ahmadi’s will proudly call the deniers of MGA as Kafirs.

Sir Syed Ahmad Khan on 2:62 in the 1870’s via his Tafsir, “Tafsir-i-Ahmadi”
As we all know, MGA and his team copied Sir Syed Ahmad Khan almost word-for-word, except for the Jesus in India=Yuz Asaf theory, that is very unique to Ahmadiyya.  They also copied Sir Syed Ahmad Khan in terms of “Jesus is Dead” and Jinn=bacteria.  Nevertheless, we are sure that Sir Syed Ahmad Khan used this verse to explain that Christians, Sabians, Jews, and all other pagans were eligible for heaven.  Or at a minimum should be seen and treated as respectful members of society.

MGA never commented on 2:62 in the famous Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya
MGA and his team of writers/scribes totally avoided this verse in this book. It should be remembered that 100+ verses of Quran were touched on in this collection.

MGA waited until 1906 to commentate on this verse
To date, MGA and his team of writers never commented on this verse at all.  We haven’t found any evidence.  What we have found is that MGA was having his beef with an Ahmadi, Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan in 1906 over the implications of this verse.  Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan emphatically wrote in his commentary that belief in MGA was not necessary, which caused MGA to ex-communicate Dr. Khan and to declare Takfir to all Muslims in the world.

1911
Mirza Mahmud Ahmad quotes MGA’s letter to Dr. Khan and does open Takfir.  Kwaja Kamaluddin and Muhammadi Ali object.  Noorudin tries to keep the peace, but fails.

1914
The split happens, the Qadiani-sect breaks away while doing open-Takfir, the Lahori’s refuse to call the belief in MGA as mandatory and also call him a non-prophet type.

1923
The Ahmadiyya Khalifa orders Ahmadi’s to stop doing open Takfir, the Takfir goes underground.

1954
While in court, the Ahmadiyya Khalifa claims that he never meant to do Takfir, and it was only meant as talking down to Muslims and Lahori-Ahmadi’s, in other words, it was only symbolic Takfir.

The 1988 official-5-volume commentary of the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid and others

 [5 volume commentary]

“””The verse important and much difference arisen about its meaning. Some who are not in the-habit Of making a deep study Of the Quran have hastily jump to the conclusion that, according to this verse, belief in Islam is not necessary. They say that anybody, whether he is a Muslim, Jew, Christian or any other, who sincerely believes in the Last Day and does good deeds will be saved. Nothing can be farther from the truth. The Quran emphatically declares in a number of verses that belief in the Holy Prophet and in his revelation is essential.”””

Additional info on this 5-volume commentary
This commentary seems to have been published in 1947 and then again in the 1960’s.  Those editions were destroyed by Ahmadiyya leadership.

1992

While commenting on this the 4th Khalifa says: [P22 Islam’s response to Contemporary Issues]

“”””As such, followers of all religions based on Divine revelation have been granted the assurance that provided they do not fail to recognize the truth of a new religion (despite their sincere efforts to understand) and stick honestly and truly to the values of their ancestral religion, they have nothing to fear from God and will not be denied salvation.”””

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/dr-abdul-hakim-khan-patialvi-vs-mga-continued/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/16/2009-tadhkirah-vs-the-2004-tadhkirah-in-terms-of-takfir/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/20/a-fake-ahmadiyya-response-to-our-essays-which-expose-ahmadiyya-takfir-from-ahmadi-answers-com/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/20/a-muslim-is-one-who-accepts-all-those-appointed-by-god-by-mirza-bashir-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-april-1911/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/20/my-beliefs-about-non-ahmadi-muslims-dated-18-august-1911-by-khwaja-kamal-uddin/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/18/in-1923-mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-the-ahmadi-khalifa-he-ordered-ahmadis-to-stop-doing-takfir-on-muslims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/dr-abdul-hakim-khan-patialvi-speaks-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1906-1907/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/15/dr-abdul-hakim-khan-predicted-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-death-the-evidence/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/06/07/a-word-for-word-translation-of-the-writings-of-dr-abdul-hakeen-khan-of-patiala/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/06/05/dr-khan-wrote-that-ahmadis-were-worhipping-mga-not-allah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/05/07/new-research-data-books-by-dr-abdul-hakeem-khan-have-been-found-vs-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/05/09/ahle-hadith-newspaper-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-his-situation-with-dr-abdul-hakim-khan-of-patiala/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/05/07/dr-abdul-hakeem-khan-the-famous-ahmadi-apostate-wrote-an-english-translation-of-the-quran-in-1905/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/15/dr-abdul-hakim-khan-predicted-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-death-the-evidence/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Piggot was mentioned in the Review of Religions of Jan 1912

Intro
After MGA died in May of 1908, the fanatical Ahmadi’s went out of their way and tried to make some of MGA’s failed prophecies as successful.  They kidnapped a few children of Batalvi and claimed that they had completed this failed specific failed prophecy and many others.  In June of 1908, Noorudin explained away the the failure of the Muhammadi Begum prophecy and etc etc etc.  Pigot was another failed prophecy, they had already mentioned Piggot in 1911 and brought up the “prayer duel” again in 1912.  In this essay, they claim that Piggot’s name was wiped from this earth.  However, this isn’t true, by 1912, Piggot was still living the life of a playboy, similar to Hugh Hefner.  The writer of this essay has to be Muhammad Ali, who was the editor at the time, Maulvi Sher Ali was the assistant editor in those days (1911-1912) (See ROR, Full year of 1911, index page).  They were presenting Piggot as a sign of MGA’s truth, which is academic dishonesty.

The reference
January 1912, english ROR, pages 1-15.  http://aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1912/reviewreligionsenglish_191201.pdf

Why were the Lahori-Ahmadi’s so confused about Piggot? 
In March of 2004, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s published a bulletin wherein it was asserted that Piggot died as a result of MGA’s prayer duel (see page 4).  Furthermore, in the 2001-2003 era, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s quoted the Qadiani branches Canadian version of the Gazette and defended Muhammad Ali for writing that MGA was a prophet in 1902.  See pages 39-41, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s say again that Piggot would meet a severe chastisement which would end on his death as a result of MGA’s prayer duel.

Links and Related Essays

http://aaiil.org/text/books/others/misc/aaiilbeliefspromisedmessiah/aaiilbeliefspromisedmessiah.pdf

http://aaiil.org/uk/newsletters/2005/0305ukbulletin.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/10/who-is-maulvi-sher-ali-1875-1947/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/08/even-in-1907-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-still-lusting-for-his-niece-muhammadi-begum/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/31/batalvis-children-were-brought-to-qadian-by-force/

http://aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1912/reviewreligionsenglish_191201.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/in-1907-ahmadiyya-newspapers-were-still-asserting-that-piggot-would-die-before-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/04/piggot-was-mentioned-by-the-ahmadiyya-newspaper-review-of-religions-in-1903/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/26/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-initial-writings-to-piggot-in-1902/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1911.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/20/dear-ahmadiyya-but-dr-alexander-dowie-changed-his-claims-after-mgas-death-challenge/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/abdullah-athim-never-repented-ahmadiyya-leadership-lied/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/fate-of-a-false-prophet-by-syed-hasanat-ahmad-the-review-of-religions-august-1984/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/16/ahmadiyya-leadership-has-been-caught-red-handed-as-they-lied-about-dr-schweisos-comments-on-piggot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-wrote-that-piggot-would-not-repent/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/22/piggot-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-the-scan-work-live-from-the-discussion-forum-on-ahmadiyya-on-fb/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/24/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-wrote-to-piggot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/17/ahmadis-editing-their-books-on-piggot/

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/5593/rev-john-hugh-smyth-pigott-his-claim-prophecy-and-end/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1911.pdf

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam #atifmian #piggot #Agapemone #pigott

Up ↑