Intro
Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi was initially working as a Mullah in the state of Bhopal, he worked exclusively for Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan, who was the husband of the Queen of Bhopal, it seems that MGA sent him his Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya in 1880 or 1882, I am not sure which volume, however, Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan tore up the book and sent it back to MGA in that condition. This could have been 1885 also. In 1890, Nawab Siddique Hassan Khan of Bhopal died and it seems that Syed Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi was jobless. In 1891, he helped MGA with secret information about the debate with Maulvi Muhammad Bashir Bhopali. After Noorudin died (1914), he left Ahmadiyya and it is unclear what religion he joined, however, it seems like he became a Lahori-Ahmadi. Muhammad Ismail Ghulam Kibria, Ahmad Hasan and Sayyid Muhammad Ya‘qub were his sons, Nawab Muhammad Ali KhAshab-e-Sidq-o-SafaAshab-e-Sidq-o-Safauneration for Molvi Muhammad Ahsan. In a letter to Nawab, MGAQ writes “whatever remuneration (payment) you have fixed for Molvi Ahsan, plz send a sum of 20 Annas to him to Qadian and remaining amount may be sent to his son Syed Muhammad Ismail to Shah Ali Sarai Amroha. As per Ashab-e-Sidq-o-Safa, which was written by Nasrullah Khan Nasir and Asim Jamali, published by Ziaul Islam Press Rabwah in 2007 and 2011. Ahsan Amrohi died in 1926.
Continue reading “Who is Syed Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha, who worked as an Imam in Bhopal uptil 1891?”
Intro
The life of Maulana Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha is an interesting case study. He left Ahmadiyya in roughly 1915, and with his entire family, it is unclear who his wife was and his children. He wrote an article in the Tashhizul Azhan of Oct-1913(as quoted by Mahmud Ahmad in 1924 and Muhammad Ali before him) in which he showed that the only prophethood which could be granted to Muslims was Nubuwwti Juzwi or partial prophethood. This contradicts the view of the Qadiani jamaat about the prophethood of MGA. In fact, Amrohi famously opposed the prophethood claim of MGA in 1901.
Continue reading ““”Prophethood among the Followers of Muhammad”” by Maulana Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha, Oct-1913, in Tashhizul Azhan”
The al-badr newspaper of 30th may, 1907 tells us:
- A book by Maulana Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha is reported as having been published in which he has related the martyrdom of Sahibzada Abdul Latif in terms of a story in Surah Yasin (Ch. 36) of the Quran. The name of the book is Sirr-ush-Shahadatain. [One wonders if this is available somewhere.]
- There is an announcement by a printer that Maulana Nur-ud-Din has given him his translation of the Quran to print and publish, and he has now published the first Part. [Such a translation never appears to have been heard of again.]
- Hazrat Mirza sahib’s book Haqiqat-ul-Wahy had just been published on 15th May.http://aaiil.org/urdu/books/others/muhammadahsanamrohi/sirrushshahada
The book Sirr-ush-Shahadatain by Hazrat Maulana Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha is now available on line at : http://www.aaiil.org/urdu/books/others/muhammadahsanamrohi/sirrushsha
Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/13/life-sketch-of-maulvi-syed-muhammad-ahsan-amrohi-2/
http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/hope/2007/hope200712_lifesketchsyedmuhammadahsanamrohi.pdfhttps://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/08/01/prophethood-among-the-followers-of-muhammad-by-maulana-sayyid-muhammad-ahsan-of-amroha-oct-1913-in-tashhizul-azhan/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/ahmadiyya-leadership-published-books-by-maulana-sayyid-muhammad-ahsan-of-amroha-on-30th-may-1907-see-al-badr/Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian
Intro
The “Sadr Anjuman”, which literally translates as “President-Council” was created by MGA in his book, “The Will” at the end of 1905 and beginning of 1906. MGA had clearly put all of the power of the community into a body of 14 men. Maulvi Noorudin was the President, at least 5-6 were family members of MGA….through marriage or otherwise…The reference for this entry is (See Muhammad Ali, A Mighty Striving, PAGE 52). In 1907, there was a famous incident wherein the father-in-law (Mir Nasir Nawab) of MGA clashed with a decision of the Sadr Anjuman, MGA then issued an order that all decisions of the Anjuman would be final.
The members of the Sadr Anjuman didn’t change until 1910 (the full list of members is posted in the below). In 1910, Noorudin, the Khalifa resigned from this position as President and got Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad elected as President without a vote (See “Truth About The Split”, online english edition, pages 266-267). That dropped the number of people from 14 to 13. Ahmadiyya sources tell us that Mir Muhammad Ishaq became a voting member in 1912. Thus giving the Mirza family 5 of the 14 voting members.
Intro
Abu Hurairah warned Muslims about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. He transmitted from Muhammad (Saw) that many Dajjal’s would appear and present hadith that no one has heard. Thus, MGA appeared and never even mentioned the name of Abu Hurairah until 1901-1902, when he cursed at him, called him stupid, and totally disrespected his legacy and took the Shia route. However, this is egregious, since Abu Hurrairah is the most prolific companion of Muhammad (saw) in terms of hadith transmission.
The story is as follows, initially, in the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya (1879-1884), MGA quoted a hadith about 62:3, MGA didn’t properly explain, as was his normal style. Nevertheless, this is the famous hadith by Abu Hurairah wherein Salma Farsi is mentioned as well as the Pleides. MGA used this verse (62:3) of the Quran to argue that he brought the Quran back to earth after it had left in the 1857 mutiny. This was in 1882, via the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3. MGA never wrote the name Abu Hurrairah in any book of the 1880’s. Even in 1891-1892, when MGA made his wildest claims, he quoted another hadith by Abu Hurrairah wherein the Messiah was supposed to live an additional 40 years, and thus, MGA made his age-prophecy, which failed miserably. Even the hadith about the two yellow garments is from Abu Hurrairah, and the hadith about the last brick, and the hadith about the Imam Mahdi will be amongst the Muslims (imamukum minkum), and how the Messiah won’t lead prayers, all of these are from Abu Hurrairah.
Why did MGA then call Abu Huraira as stupid? The reason was because there was a famous hadith in Bukhari, which was also quoted by Tafsir Ibn Kathir, wherein it is proves that Esa (As) hasn’t died yet. It is posted below. It all started in 1902, when MGA was forced to comment on the famous hadith of Abu Hurrairah wherein he told the world that 4:159 was about the physical return of Eisa (As) and how Eisa (As) would die upon his second return. Again in 1907, via Haqiqatul Wahy, MGA attacked the credibility of Abu Hurrairah. After MGA died, Braheen e Ahmadiyya Vol. 5 was published, in this book, MGA claimed that the beliefs of Abu Hurraira (ra) would lead Muslims to shirk. Last thing,
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Who is Abu Huraira?
In Sunni Islam, Abū Hurayrah al-Dawsiyy al-Zahrāniyy (Arabic: أبو هريرة الدوسي الزهراني; 603–681), often spelled Abu Hurairah, was one of the sahabah (companions) of Muhammad and, according to Sunni Islam, the most prolific narrator of hadith. He was known by the kunyah Abu Hurayrah “Father of the Kitten”, in reference to his documented attachment to cats. However, his real name is differed upon, with the most popular opinion being that it was ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Ṣakhr (عبد الرحمن بن صخر). Abu Hurayrah spent four years in the company of Muhammad and went on expeditions and journeys with him. It is estimated that he narrated around 5374 Ahadith.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad totally disrespected Abu Hurairah”
Intro
Qadiani-Ahmadi’s sometimes quote 5:14 (5:15 in the Qadiani-Ahmadi Quran) as they argue against 4:159 and the fact that it clearly says that ALL Christians and Jews will convert to Islam when Esa (as) physically returns. However, 5:14 of the Quran only states how Christians and Jews will be arguing with each other until the Day of Judgement (see Suyuti). This verse doesn’t negate the info in 4:159. Continue reading “Why do Ahmadi’s argue that per 5:14, all Jews and Christians won’t convert to Islam when Esa (as) returns?”
Intro
Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din is the famous Lahori-Ahmadi and was an intimate friend and personal lawyer for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. In fact, in 1904, Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din prevented MGA from being jailed by presenting 500 rupees as bail money. This was unprecedented, the judge didn’t think MGA’s lawyer and team would have such a heavy amount, it’s really a fishy story. Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din legally represented MGA many times and gave legal advice regularly to MGA and his team of workers at Qadian. His older brother was also a staunch Ahmadi, he had a similar name too, Khwaja Jamal ud Din. When the 2nd Khalifa was elected, Khwaja Kamal-uddin was in England and thus powerless. He returned to British India in December of 1914 and immediately published “The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914″. He doesn’t seem to have had an extensive literary career, in fact, most of his books are his lectures which were converted into books after his death. Continue reading “Who is Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din?”
Intro
It seems that Ibn Arabi, in his famous book, Tafsir Ibn Arabi, wrote that Jesus was raised up in his Ruh from the lower world to the higher world (his body seems to have been discarded on Earth, per Ibn Arabi), and then Jesus will descend in the end times with a different body. This might elude to 56:61 of the Quran. However, this is in total contradiction of the Ahmadiyya position. Ahmadi’s claim that Esa (as) died 90 years after the event of the crucifixion and in India, whereas, Ibn Arabi and all other Muslims claim that Mutawafeeka happened before the event of crucifixion. There are other references from Ibn Arabi’s works wherein he claims that Esa (as) was never even on the cross and a phantom image was crucified. Ibn Arabi also claimed to be like Esa (as) in a strange way, and thus, the islamic world doesn’t follow his teachings or take him seriously. Nevertheless, we have posted the reference and will wait for independent verification.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Continue reading “If Ibn Arabi believed that Esa (as) would physically return to Earth with a new body, why do Ahmadi’s quote him?”
Intro
MGA and his team of writers were always perplexed about a hadith report from Sahih-Muslim and an identical report from Ibn Majah. In both of these hadith, it was told by Muhammad (saw) that when Esa (as) would physically descend from heaven, he would physically have 2 angels on his side. In 1914, Kwaja Kamaluddin tells us (See The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914) that these 2 angels were Noorudin and Syed Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi. In Khwaja’s book, he didn’t talk about the hadith specifically, however, we know that this is the famous hadith from Muslim and Ibn Majah (when they refer to the 2 angels).
MGA claimed to be surrounded by angels all the time, he even called himself as as having Ruhul-Qudus (1891), in fact, his famous Khutbah ilhamiya was a situation wherein MGA claimed that his tongue was taken over by Gabriel. MGA had some weird angels who would visit him, sometimes, they would dance, sometimes they would bring money and call themselves Tichi Tichi. In 1905, MGA had a revelation of his published in his newspaper the Al-Badr wherein he described meeting an angel named Tichi Tichi. By 1907, MGA gave an explanation of this incident via Haqiqatul Wahy. However, this issue still haunts Ahmadi’s to this day. This is an embarrassing event in the history of Ahmadiyya. There were other strange angels who interacted with MGA, like Mithal Lal, Darshani, Khairati, Ayal or Ail, Sher Ali, and Hafeez. MGA had some weird angels who would visit him, sometimes, they would sing and dance. #Ahmadi sources claim that angels taught Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad the Fatiha, and no one knew it before him. Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Noorudin and Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi were the 2 angels that he descended with”