Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"Arya Darham"

“Arya Dharam” or “The Arya Religion” (1895) by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

Intro
This is an interesting book, we haven’t totally evaluated it yet.  However, it seems to have lots of controversial information. MGA wrote about the child-marriage of Aisha and many other related topics. The Arya Samaj hindus seem to have written an analysis of the marriages of Muhammad (saw). MGA and his team responded with “The Arya Religion” (1895). The second edition of this book was published in 1903. This was a small part in the overall beef that MGA started with the Arya Samaj in the early 1880’s. Lekh Ram came soon thereafter. In this book, MGA complained that his God and prophet were being unnecessarily ridiculed and it should be against the law, however, MGA himself insulted the God of Christians in this very, in fact, he used Hindu writings vs. Jesus Christ as he called him a drunkard and a fornicator. Continue reading ““Arya Dharam” or “The Arya Religion” (1895) by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad specifically wanted europeans prostitutes to be given to British soldiers in India

Intro
Watch my video on this herein, and my Tik Tok and instagram. MGA was so far gone, he endorsed an idea wherein european prostitutes should be brought in to service the British soldiers who were toiling in India. Arya Darham is the same book that contains sexual poetry and etc. In this same book, MGA wrote about the child-marriage of Aisha and many other related topics. The Arya Samaj hindus seem to have written an analysis of the marriages of Muhammad (saw). MGA and his team responded with “The Arya Religion” (1895). The second edition of this book was published in 1903. This was a small part in the overall beef that MGA started with the Arya Samaj in the early 1880’s. Lekh Ram came soon thereafter. In this book, MGA complained that his God and prophet were being unnecessarily ridiculed and it should be against the law, however, MGA himself insulted the God of Christians in this very book, in fact, he used Hindu writings vs. Jesus Christ as he called him a drunkard and a fornicator.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad specifically wanted europeans prostitutes to be given to British soldiers in India”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s position on Nikah mut’ah?

Intro
In 1895, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote that Nikah-Muta was only allowed for 3 days and then stopped altogether by Muhammad (saw)(See Arya Dharam). MGA also asserted that Nikah-Muta isn’t in the quran or hadith, MGA also wished that Nikah Muta was still available (see the scan in the below). However, this is a bold face lie, 4:24 of the Quran covers the topic of Nikah-Muta as well as many Sahih-hadith from Bukhari. By 1988, and via Malik Ghulam Farid’s famous 5-volume english commentary of the Quran, Ahmadi’s denied Nikah Muta altogether, and thus, contradicted MGA. It is unclear what the 2nd Khalifa wrote in Tafsir i Kabir and Tafsir i Saghir. Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s position on Nikah mut’ah?”

The Akhbar-e-‘Am of Lahore and its support of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

Intro
The Akhbar-e-‘Am newspaper of Lahore was started in 1870 by a Kashmiri pundit, Mukand Lal. (See “Lineages of the Present: Ideology and Politics in Contemporary South Asia” By Aijaz Ahmad, page 124). Dard tells us (page 59, ‘”Life of Ahmad”)that MGA read Akhbar-e-‘Am in the latter stage of his life. However, MGA sent letters to the Akhbar-e-‘Am as early as 1885. It should be noted that it is also written as Akhbar-e-‘Aam (See Tadhkirah). In 1895, MGA quoted (and agreed with this quote) the Akhbar-e-‘Aam in Arya Dharam and in 1907 in Haqiqatul Wahy, thus proving that MGA supported them and vice versa.  Continue reading “The Akhbar-e-‘Am of Lahore and its support of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Adam (as) was born a twin (in pairs), totally unislamic

Intro
In 1907, in MGA’s famous book, Haqiqatul Wahy, MGA claimed that Adam (as) was born as a twin. This seems to be the first time that MGA used his argument in his career. We haven’t found any instances before this. This belief is totally unislamic. In the Quran, 2:35-36, proves that Adam (as) was living in Jannah (heaven) with Allah. Allah then created Eve. Allah then sent them both to Earth, through the 7 heavens. Historically, in 1898, in Kitab ul Barriya, MGA was claiming that he was born with a twin sister, however, this seems to be a lie. It seems that MGA was creating a back story. About 10 years later, MGA was asserting that Adam (as) was created as a twin (see the full quote in the below). Later on, in Malfuzat, MGA and his team of writers seems to have given additional data on Adam (as) not being the first man. Watch my video on this here.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Adam (as) was born a twin (in pairs), totally unislamic”

MGA denies the Islamic creation theory in 1895

Intro
I was under the impression that MGA deviated from Islam in 1891, upon his claim of being the long awaited Messiah.  However, new research work has proven that MGA began denying some of the basics of Islam in the mid-1880’s.

The Quote
1895 in Arya Dharam:

Urdu Transliteration—-“”””jasay Hazrat Hawa Hazrat Adam ki pasli sa nikali gae aisay he har yak larkay ki joroo us ki pasli sa nikali gae ho””””

“””Just like Hazrat Hawa was created by rib of Hazrat Adam same as each boy’s wife was created from his rib.( rk vol 10 Aariya Darham page 39)”””

12345

Conclusions
MGA and Noorudin were conspiring together to create a religious business as early as 1882. They seem to have slowly changed their beliefs about Islam without giving proper announcements.  It is likely that Sir Syed also denied the “RIB” story and MGA simply stole the new argument and passed it off as his own.  In fact, all the abrahamic religions have this in common.  They all believe that women were made from the rib of a man.

 

 

MGA’s strange beliefs on the birth of Adam (as)

Intro
MGA contradicted himself many times. Most likely because he had multiple ghost-writers. In a recent catch, we see MGA and his team of writers trying to assert that Adam (as) was born as a twin…and Eve or Hawa was the female twin of Adam (as) (nauzobillah).
____________________________________________________________________________ _________________

The reference work
(1907)— “””Adam twa’am(twin) k toor par paida hoa tah, pahlay Adam or baad ma Hawa (rk vol 22 haqiqatul wahi page 209)”””—urdu transliteration

English—“Adam was born as a twin, first Adam and then Hawa (aka Eve)”

14725527_892560084212416_4659436476707395719_n_____________________________________________________________________________________________

20 years earlier, and before 1891 he wrote
1895 in Arya Dharam:

Urdu Transliteration—-“”””jasay Hazrat Hawa Hazrat Adam ki pasli sa nikali gae aisay he har yak larkay ki joroo us ki pasli sa nikali gae ho””””

“””Just like Hazrat Hawa was created by rib of Hazrat Adam same as each boy’s wife was created from his rib.( rk vol 10 Aariya Darham page 39)”””

1

______________________________________________________________________________________________
In 1908, MGA said….

An English scholar of Astronomy, Professor Wragge met the Promised Messiah on 12th May and 18th May 1908 in Lahore and asked him a few questions as reported in Malfooza’at Vol. 10, Pages 353 and 426. Among other questions he asked: “It is written in the Bible that Adam or say the first man was born in Jeehoon, Seehon and belonged to that country. Are, then, all the mankind, that is found in different parts of the world like America and Australia, the descendants of the same Adam?” To this question the Promised Messiah replied, “We do not follow the Bible in holding that the world began with the birth of Adam six or seven thousand years ago, and that before this there was nothing, and God was, as it were idle and without work. Neither do we claim that all mankind who are now found in different parts of the earth, are the progeny of the self-same Adam. On the Contrary we hold that this Adam was not the first man. Mankind existed even before him, as is hinted by the Quran itself, when it says to Adam, “I am about to place a Khalifa in the earth.” As Khalifa means successor, it is clear that man existed even before Adam. Hence we cannot say whether the original inhabitants of America, Australia etc. are the progeny of this last Adam or some other Adam gone before him. (Malfooza’at Vol. 10, Page 426).

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Why did he lie?

MGA and his team seemed to try to make a parallel fit, they wanted to argue that MGA was born just like Adam (as)…i.e. of a twin. Moreover, they are also hinting towards other parallels here…since they knew that the quran linked the miraculous birth of Esa (as) to that of Adam (as)….they wanted to use this idea for an argument.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Additional lies and cover up…

In this video…(Retrieved on 10-18-16)these Ahmadis argued that women were created before men and thus supported MGA’s writings on the topic. They also explained away the Arya Dharam quote as a metaphor. So, they called MGA’s writings on this topic as a metaphor, without addressing the later writings….this is a classic Ahmadi tactic of deflection.

Further, the official Ahmadi-comprehensive english commentary on the Quran tells us that this verse means that mankind was born from 2 souls, man and woman, and thus its supports MGA’s view on this topic.  He then goes on to argue that women werent really created from the rib of a man, and its only a metaphor.

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Other lies about Adam by Ahmadiyya

As we all know…Ahmadis dont believe that Adam (as) was the first human. They believe in many Adams (as)….they also dont believe that Adam (as) physically descended (nuzul) to Earth from Heaven, which is an established islamic belief.

______________________________________________________________________________________________
The Lahori-Ahmadi position

Muhammad Ali (see 4:1) cleverly made the argument that this verse infers that mankind started from “pairs” and not from a single person. He didn’t care to comment on “rib” topic. I’ve found many instances wherein Muhammad Ali has steered clear of certain controversial topics.  

______________________________________________________________________________________________
The Islamic position on the Adam?

Tafsir Ibn Kathir is an amazing classical book on Tafsir. Ibn Kathir tells us that Allah created a single soul, i.e. Adam (as) and then created Hawa aka Eva from the rib of Adam (as).  

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Conclusions

MGA and his team of ghost-writers seem to have denied the islamic concept of creation as early as 1886. The ulema must have been concerned. It was Sir Syed who first challenged this topic and obviously, MGA’s team stole Sir Syed’s argument.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Links and Related Essays

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team went back and forth in terms of if Jesus had a biological father or not

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/10/15/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-that-mga-was-born-a-twin-in-pairs-totally-unislamic/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/07/noor-uddin-secretly-disagreed-with-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-on-the-birth-of-esa-as/

http://www.muslim.org/books/f-ahm-mv/ch12.htm#u

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/02/muhammad-ali-the-lahori-ahmadi-denies-the-miraculous-birth-of-esa-as-in-1917/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Fountain-of-Christianity.pdf

http://www.muslim.org/sa-case/evidence/s16.htm

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

 

Up ↑