Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"Bashir Misri"

Zahid Aziz vs. Bashir Ahmad Misri

Intro
Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad, (the Khalifa of the Ahmadiyya Movement) was accused of preying on young boys in Qadian in 1937, by Bashir Ahmad Misri and others like Fakhurddin Multani, who was 18 years old at the time.  The Khalifa was not only the spiritual head of the community but was also the owner of most of the land in and around the town of Qadian, as a Feudal Lord of the British Government.  Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri was born in Qadian in 1914, he was the Ahmadi who accused Mahmud Ahmad of sex crimes in Qadian in the 1936-37.  His father was Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri, who was a high-ranking Qadiani-Ahmadi-Imam in those days, in fact, he would sometimes serve as in-charge of Qadian when the Khalifa would be out of town.  Bashir Ahmad Misri and his friends (Fakhr ud Din Multani was murdered, he died a few days later) were attacked in broad day light in Qadian on Saturday, 08-07-1937, around 4:30 pm at the time of Asr prayers.  This led to his family asking for government and Muslim (the Ahrar’s) protection from the Mirza family.  They seem to have moved to Lahore in late 1937.  His father was hired as an Imam for the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.  However, Bashir Ahmad Misri joined Sunni-Islam in 1940 and moved to East Africa, wherein he seems to have worked as a teacher.  In 1961, he was allowed to move to London.  A few years later, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s hired him to be an editor.  It seems that Bashir Ahmad Misri was planning to make friends with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s and then to turn on them at an opportune time.  Which is exactly what he did.  In 1964, he became the Imam of the Woking Mosque.  By July 1968, his plan was in motion, he organized the local Muslim’s and wrestled control of the mosque from the Lahori-Ahmadi’s to the local Muslim scholars.  He them left and went on a tour.  His father died as a Lahori-Ahmadi in Pakistan in 1979.  Bashir Ahmad Misri then responded to Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s global Mubahila challenge in 1989 and wrote about his youth in Qadian.  His death year is unknown to us.

Zahid Aziz vs. Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri
We found additional data wherein a famous Lahori-Ahmadi, Zahid Aziz commented on the statements of Bashir Ahmad Misri.

The link
http://www.ahmadiyya.org/uk/light-apr07.pdf

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/23/mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-had-20-children-with-7-wives/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/21/bashir-ahmad-misri-and-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

http://www.wokingmuslim.org/work/islamic-review/isrevconts-1968.pdf

See here—https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-accused-of-immoral-behavior-at-qadian-1938-he-calls-it-normal/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/21/bashir-ahmad-misri-and-ahmadiyya/

Misri Mubahila

http://www.irshad.org/brochures/bane.php

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/uk/light-apr07.pdf

http://www.shahjahanmosque.org.uk/imam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/07/in-1937-was-the-mirza-family-was-suffering-the-divine-the-wrath-of-their-false-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/29/mazhar-multani-son-of-fakhar-uddin-multani-wrote-3-books-vs-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/fakhar-ud-din-multani-on-his-death-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/new-data-on-the-murder-of-fakhar-ud-din-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/20/the-first-time-a-qadiani-ahmadi-murdered-a-muslim-for-criticizing-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1930/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Sialkot #Mosqueattack

 

Bashir Ahmad Misri, Murdered Multani were Correct about Mirza Mahmud in 1937 – Viceroy Papers

Intro
Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri was born in Qadian in 1914, he was the Ahmadi who accused Mahmud Ahmad of sex crimes in Qadian in the 1936-37.  His father was Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri, who was a high-ranking Qadiani-Ahmadi-Imam in those days, in fact, he would sometimes serve as in-charge of Qadian when the Khalifa would be out of town.  Bashir Ahmad Misri and his friends (Fakhr ud Din Multani was murdered, he died a few days later) were attacked in broad day light in Qadian on Saturday, 08-07-1937, around 4:30 pm at the time of Asr prayers.  This led to his family asking for government and Muslim (the Ahrar’s) protection from the Mirza family.  They seem to have moved to Lahore in late 1937.  His father was hired as an Imam for the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.  However, Bashir Ahmad Misri joined Sunni-Islam in 1940 and moved to East Africa, wherein he seems to have worked as a teacher.  In 1961, he was allowed to move to London.  A few years later, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s hired him to be an editor.  It seems that Bashir Ahmad Misri was planning to make friends with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s and then to turn on them at an opportune time.  Which is exactly what he did.  In 1964, he became the Imam of the Woking Mosque.  By July 1968, his plan was in motion, he organized the local Muslim’s and wrestled control of the mosque from the Lahori-Ahmadi’s to the local Muslim scholars.  He them left and went on a tour.  His father died as a Lahori-Ahmadi in Pakistan in 1979.  Bashir Ahmad Misri then responded to Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s global Mubahila challenge in 1989 and wrote about his youth in Qadian.  His death year is unknown to us.

The events of 1937 in Qadian went all the way to the Governor of the Punjab and the Governor-General (Viceroy) of India. Recently released documents by the Indian government show that:

  • Abdur Rahman Masri and Fakhruddin Multani did accuse Mirza Mahmud of moral turpitude of a sexual nature
  • Mirza Mahmud had no response but to incite violence against them up to the point that the Deputy Commissioner Gurdaspur was thinking about charging him.
  • Incitement led directly to the murder of Fakhruddin Multani
  • Deputy Commissioner Gurdaspur had to threaten Mirza Mahmud in order to get his tone down and renounce violence
  • Masri and Multani were guarded by police and authorities advised them to leave Qadian for their own safety
  • Section 144 (unlawful assembly) was imposed in Qadian for many days and mass prosecution under section 107 (incitement, same charge that was brought against Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) was contemplated

See this page from the original.  Other pages and complete description is at Fakhruddin Multani’s page, and Masri’s account.

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

http://www.wokingmuslim.org/work/islamic-review/isrevconts-1968.pdf

See here—https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-accused-of-immoral-behavior-at-qadian-1938-he-calls-it-normal/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/21/bashir-ahmad-misri-and-ahmadiyya/

Misri Mubahila

http://www.irshad.org/brochures/bane.php

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/uk/light-apr07.pdf

http://www.shahjahanmosque.org.uk/imam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/07/in-1937-was-the-mirza-family-was-suffering-the-divine-the-wrath-of-their-false-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/29/mazhar-multani-son-of-fakhar-uddin-multani-wrote-3-books-vs-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/fakhar-ud-din-multani-on-his-death-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/new-data-on-the-murder-of-fakhar-ud-din-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/20/the-first-time-a-qadiani-ahmadi-murdered-a-muslim-for-criticizing-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1930/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/07/in-1937-was-the-mirza-family-was-suffering-the-divine-the-wrath-of-their-false-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/29/mazhar-multani-son-of-fakhar-uddin-multani-wrote-3-books-vs-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/fakhar-ud-din-multani-on-his-death-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/new-data-on-the-murder-of-fakhar-ud-din-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/20/the-first-time-a-qadiani-ahmadi-murdered-a-muslim-for-criticizing-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1930/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Bashir Ahmad Misri’s Mubahila with Mirza Tahir Ahmad (1989)

Intro
Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri was born in Qadian in 1914, he was the Ahmadi who accused Mahmud Ahmad of sex crimes in Qadian in the 1936-37.  His father was Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri, who was a high-ranking Qadiani-Ahmadi-Imam in those days, in fact, he would sometimes serve as in-charge of Qadian when the Khalifa would be out of town.  Bashir Ahmad Misri and his friends (Fakhr ud Din Multani was murdered, he died a few days later) were attacked in broad day light in Qadian on Saturday, 08-07-1937, around 4:30 pm at the time of Asr prayers.  This led to his family asking for government and Muslim (the Ahrar’s) protection from the Mirza family.  They seem to have moved to Lahore in late 1937.  His father was hired as an Imam for the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.  However, Bashir Ahmad Misri joined Sunni-Islam in 1940 and moved to East Africa, wherein he seems to have worked as a teacher.  In 1961, he was allowed to move to London.  A few years later, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s hired him to be an editor.  It seems that Bashir Ahmad Misri was planning to make friends with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s and then to turn on them at an opportune time.  Which is exactly what he did.  In 1964, he became the Imam of the Woking Mosque.  By July 1968, his plan was in motion, he organized the local Muslim’s and wrestled control of the mosque from the Lahori-Ahmadi’s to the local Muslim scholars.  He them left and went on a tour.  His father died as a Lahori-Ahmadi in Pakistan in 1979.  Bashir Ahmad Misri then responded to Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s global Mubahila challenge in 1989 and wrote about his youth in Qadian while he was living in England.  His death year is unknown to us.

1st January 1989
Al Hafiz B.A. Masri
7 Hurst Road East Molesey Surrey KT8 9AQ England
To Mr. Tahir Ahmad Mirza Amir Jamaat Ahmadiyya 16-18 Gressenhall Road London SW18 5QL England

Taken from: http://ahmedi.org/eng-articles/misrimubahila.html

1.Your secretary Mr. Rashid Ahmad Chaudhry, has sent me a letter (undated) by Recorded Delivery daring me on your behalf to accept your challenge of Mubahilla which you gave to the opponents of Qadianism on the 10th June 1988. This letter, along with a copy your challenge reached me on the 5th of August 1988.

2. It gives me great pleasure to accept your challenge and to avail myself of this opportunity to expose the pious fraud of Qadianism once and for all.

3. Mubahilla is a sort of ordeal by prayer in which two parties beseach Allah to establish the truth or falsity of matter under dispute. Since Mubahilla is a grave matter of utmost solemnity, it is expedient that we should settle its articles and convenants directly between the two of us instead of negotiating through our secretaries to avoid any possibility of ambiguity or incertitude in the final result of it.

4. On page 4 of your challenge you have conceded that those who accept your challenge are free to single out any one clause out of the articles you have listed. I therefore choose to accept the articles which you have written on page 2 in these words: “The second aspect of this Mubahilla concerns the utterly false accusations and the mischieveous propaganda against the Ahmadiyya community.”

5. Since my accusations are about matters of moral turpitude and sexual promiscuity of a nature which is not generally thought fit to be mentioned to ears polite, it needs to be explained as to why I feel justified and morally obliged in making these immodest accusations as issue for this ‘Mubahila’.

6. Normally no individual has a right to sit in judgement on another individual. However when a person assume a position of trust and moral responsibility he becomes personalized as an institution and forfeits his prerogative as an individual. In any civilized society, Doctors of Medicine, School Teachers, Office Bearers of Destitute Homes and Orphanges, the functionaries of all such institutions become open to moral and ethical censorship, in addition to Statutory Law. One of the reasons why religious charlatans and impostors remain unconstrained from the exploition of simple and gullible people is that the Governments of Secular States do not feel inclined to interfere in matters spiritual. It is left to society at large to regulate the affairs of their respective religious institutions and establishments.

7. My second justification is that your Qadiani clique started violating the civilized norms of sexual ethics not as individuals but as an institution in the name of Islam. Stop calling yourselves as Muslims, give yourselves any appellation as a new religion and Muslims will gladly leave you alone.

8. My accusations are not against the generality of the Qadiani community. There are many among them who believe in the Qadiani doctrines honestly and sincerely, albeit mistakenly. We do not start kicking against the people of other faiths on the grounds of doctrinal differences. It is only when their lifestyle becomes a menace to the ethical fabric of a society that people put their foot down. If there are degenerates in this world who are willing to sacrifice the honour and chastity of their womenfolk and young boys out of devotion to the religious thugs, good luck to them. However the moot point of contention arises when unsuspecting and innocent victims fall prey to such deceits. In that situation you feel justified in shouting from the roof-tops: Snake in the grass!

9. It is with this sence of moral responsibility and genuine solicitude that I accept your challenge of Mubahilla to establish whether the following accusations are true or false. MY CLAIM THAT THEY ARE TRUE IS BASED ON MY PERSONAL KNOLEDGE GAINED DURING MY LIFE IN QADIAN WHERE I WAS BORN AND BROUGHT UP UNTIL 1937, WHEN I DENOUNCED QADIANISM. THE OATH OF MUBAHILA

10. You shall declare on oath, in the words laid down below, that the under-mentioned statements made by me are false to the best of your knowledge; and I shall declare oath in the same words that they are true to the best of my knowledge:

11. “I Mirza Tahir Ahmad (Son of Mirza Basheer-ud-Din Mahmoud Ahmad s/o Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement), the present Amir of the Qadiani section of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, declare it on oath in the name of Allah that to the best of my knowledge, the under-mentioned statements made by Al-Hafiz B-A Masri, s/o Sheikh Abdul Rahman Masri, are false and that I have no knowledge to the effect that they are true. I pray and beseech Allah that in case I am perjuring myself by willingly uttering this false evidence while on oath, I may be cursed by Allah and die within one year from the date of uttering and signing of this oath in the presence of six witnesses, three of whom shall be selected by me and three shall be selected by the said Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri.”
Signed by: six witnesses Signed by Mirza Tahir Ahmad .

12.”I, Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri (s/o Sheikh Abdul Rahman Masri), declare it on oath the name of Allah that, to the best of my knowledge, the under-mentioned statements made by me are true. I further declare it on oath in the name of Allah that Mirza Tahir Ahmad, the present Amir of the Qadiani section of the Ahmiadiyya Jamaat knows that they are true. I pray and beseech Allah that in case I am perjuring myself by wilfully uttering this false evidence while on oath, I may be cursed by Allah and die within one year from the date of uttering and signing of this oath in the presence of six witnesses three of whom shall be selected by the said Mirza Tahir Ahmad.”
Signed by: Six Witnesses Signed by Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri. THE ADJURATIONS OF MUBAHILA

13. I, Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri, give this evidence on oath in the name of Allah that: Your father, Mirza Basheer ud-din Mahmoud Ahmad (the eldest of the three sons of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad who was the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement, the Second Khalifa of the Qadiani section of the Ahmadiyya Jama’at) was a debaucher, fornicator, adulterer and incestuous i.e. guilty of habitual sexual intercourse even with women of near kin who are declared by not only the Islamic Shari’ah but also by all scriptural religions as inviolable (Haram). Your paternal uncle, Mirza Basheer Ahmad ( the second of the three sons of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) was a homosexual with a great sexual propensity for young boys. Your paternal uncle, Mirza Shareef Ahmad (the third of the three sons of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) was a homosexual with a great propensity for your boys. Your elder brother, Mirza Nasir (s/o Mirza Basheer- ud-Din Mahamoud Ahmad, grandson of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the third Khalifa) was a fornicator and homosexual. Your maternal grand-uncle, Mir Muhammad Ishaque (brother of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s wife) held an oligarchial and celebrated position in the Qadiani community and was honoured with the title of Muhaddith, i.e. authority on Hadith (Sunnah and Tradition). He was a homosexual. As the man-in-charge of the orphanage in Qadian, the young orphan boys were helplessly at the mercy of his perversions.

14. I could go on listing many more names of people who held very high positions in the Qadiani Establishment, using their prestige and power to gratify their sensuous and perverted desires free of moral censure. However the real reason for writing these sordid details, even though it is an obscene subject, is to refute your assertion that the accusations are utterly false” and a “mischievous propaganda” against the “Ahmadies” while you know fully well that they are true.

15. As it is, I have confined the list of people in the above accusation to the Mirza family only in order not to confiuse the issue and thus to leave any loop-hole in it for to wriggle out of this Mubahila. Even within the Mirza family, I have left out many names of the second and the third generations for the same reason. The main reason for not including women of this family in this list is out of comassion. Although some of them have played a very active and willing role in this abomination and fraud, I consider them by and large as being the victims rather than the cluprits. Most of them had no choice and deserve pity.

16. The circumscription of the period of Mubahila to one year is meant to achieve definitive verdict of Allah. Leaving it open to generalities and to an unspecified period as you have done in your challenge, would leave the outcome of the Mubahila inconclusive. However, I am open to suggestions by you for any alteration in the span of time.

17. In case you try to seek shelter under the plea that you cannot vouch under oath for the good or bad moral conduct of those who are dead, I would point out that you have already agreed in principle to do so, on page 8 of your challenge in these words: “Since the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement is no longer in this world and it is neccessary that there should be a party to represent him, I and the Ahmadiyya community declare it with all our hearts and without any scruples that we accept this challenge of Mubahilla on his dehalf.”

18. If you are prepared to accept the challenge of Mubahilla on behalf of your dead grandfather, there is no earthly reason why you should not be able to accept a similar Mubahilla on behalf of your dead father, dead uncles and dead brother.

19. Apart from this the moot point at issue on which I am accepting your challenge of Mubahilla is not that you should represent your ancestors mentioned in paragraph 13. Your are being put on oath to vouch for yourself whether or not it is within your knowledge that your ancestors named in that paragraph were morally depraved and sexual debauchees. The reson why it has become necessary to drag these obscenities into the open is to prove that you as the head of a so-called religious denomination, know all these facts to be true and yet you are hypocritically misleading your followers and others and perpetuating the fraud of Qadianism in the name of Islam.

20. I hope you will appreciate that, by accepting your challenge of Mubahillah. I am giving you a unique chance of proving once and for all that my accusations are false. What you have to do is simply to declare on oath, in the words prescribed above in paragraph 11, that you have no knowledge that my above-stated accusations in paragraph 13 are true. I assertively insist that you know without a shadow of doubt that my accusations are true, so much so that on my part I am prepared unhesitatingly to stake not only my cerdibility but my life as well on it. More than that I am prepared to lay myself open to the eternal curse of Allah on myself, in case I am wrong or uttering a falsehood.

21. Mr Tahir Ahmad! Let us take our case to the Court of Allah, the Supreme Judge of the Universe and leave it to him to adjudge between us.
Signed: B.A. Masri. Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri.
P.S. Since there are millions of Muslims who do not know Urdu,I would request you to do all your correspondence on this subject in English, which can be translated later into Urde, Arabic and other languages.
B.A. Masri.
BY REGISTERED POST To Mr. Tahir Ahmad Mirza Amir Jama’at Ahmadiyya 16-18 Gressenhall Road London SW18 5QL England.

A REMINDER It is noted that you have neglected to respond to my letter, accepting your challenge of Mubahilla. This was mailed to you by registered post on the 18th August 1988, and two months later there is still no reply from you. In case I do not receive a reply from you within two weeks, I shall have to make it known to the Muslim world that your challenge of Mubahilah was nothing more than a cheap con game and a confidence trick at which you people have become quite adept.
I would like to make this point clear that, until the oath of Mubahila has been pronounced and Allah’s Judgement has been invoked solemnly by both the parties, the Mubahilah does not become operative. I have to request you, in your own interest, not to try to have me killed, as your predecessors used to do when cornered in similar circumstances. Otherwise the consequences for you and your minions would be extremely disastrous.
The whole Muslim world has come to know what kind of people you are. They are getting fed up with your Qadiani fraud in the name of Islam and are not prepared to put up with it any longer. I am still hoping against hope that you would tell me when and how you would like both of us take the oath of Mubahila.

Signed: Al Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri.

Links and Related Essays

Misri Mubahila

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

http://www.wokingmuslim.org/work/islamic-review/isrevconts-1968.pdf

See here—https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-accused-of-immoral-behavior-at-qadian-1938-he-calls-it-normal/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/21/bashir-ahmad-misri-and-ahmadiyya/

Misri Mubahila

http://www.irshad.org/brochures/bane.php

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/uk/light-apr07.pdf

http://www.shahjahanmosque.org.uk/imam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/07/in-1937-was-the-mirza-family-was-suffering-the-divine-the-wrath-of-their-false-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/29/mazhar-multani-son-of-fakhar-uddin-multani-wrote-3-books-vs-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/fakhar-ud-din-multani-on-his-death-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/new-data-on-the-murder-of-fakhar-ud-din-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/20/the-first-time-a-qadiani-ahmadi-murdered-a-muslim-for-criticizing-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1930/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Who is Bashir Ahmad Misri? (1914– )

Intro
He was born in Qadian in 1914, he was the Ahmadi who accused Mahmud Ahmad of sex crimes in Qadian in the 1936-37.  His father was Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri, who was a high-ranking Qadiani-Ahmadi-Imam in those days, in fact, he would sometimes serve as in-charge of Qadian when the Khalifa would be out of town.  Bashir Ahmad Misri and his friends (Fakhr ud Din Multani was murdered, he died a few days later) were attacked in broad day light in Qadian on Saturday, 08-07-1937, around 4:30 pm at the time of Asr prayers.  This led to his family asking for government and Muslim (the Ahrar’s) protection from the Mirza family.  They seem to have moved to Lahore in late 1937.  His father was hired as an Imam for the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.  However, Bashir Ahmad Misri joined Sunni-Islam in 1940 and moved to East Africa, wherein he seems to have worked as a teacher.  In 1961, he was allowed to move to London.  A few years later, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s hired him to be an editor.  It seems that Bashir Ahmad Misri was planning to make friends with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s and then to turn on them at an opportune time.  Which is exactly what he did.  In 1964, he became the Imam of the Woking Mosque.  By July 1968, his plan was in motion, he organized the local Muslim’s and wrestled control of the mosque from the Lahori-Ahmadi’s to the local Muslim scholars.  He them left and went on a tour.  His father died as a Lahori-Ahmadi in Pakistan in 1979.  Bashir Ahmad Misri then responded to Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s global Mubahila challenge in 1989 and wrote about his youth in Qadian.  His death year is unknown to us.

1914
Bashir Ahmad Misri is born in Qadian.

1932
In 1989, Bashir Ahmad Misri tells the world that when was 18 (1932) he was invited into the Khalifa’s inner circle of sex with boys and drugs.

1932–July 1937
Bashir Ahmad Misri is living with the stigma of knowing that the Mirza family was fake and fraudulent.  We are unsure when he told his father about the homosexual/pedophilia filled life of the Khalifa.

August 1937
Fukhr ud Din Multani, Bashir Ahmad Misri and one other Ex-Ahmadi are attached in broad daylight in Qadian.  Multani ended up dying a few days later in the hospital.

September 1937
Shaikh Abdur Rahman Misri asks for government-police and Muslim (the Ahrar’s) protection from the Mirza family.  They seem to have moved to Lahore in late 1937.  His father was hired as an Imam for the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.

1940–1961
He converts to Sunni Islam and moves to Africa to work.  During his 20 years stay in East Africa, he was the Headmaster of the largest Secondary school there, and also held secretarial and presidential posts on religious, social and educational organizations among African, Asian and European communities.

1961
He settled in England and for six years was Joint-Editor of the monthly magazine “The Islamic Review.”

1964
Someway and somehow, he got appointed as an Imam at famous Lahori-Ahmadi managed mosque in the Woking.  This may have been due to the fact that his dad was still a Lahori-Ahmadi. Bashir Ahmad Misri worked behind the scenes as Imam and was able to snatch control from the Lahori-Ahmadis and handing over control of the mosque to local Sunni leaders.  This broke Lahorism, the Lahori-Ahmadis never recovered and have been withering away ever since, further, there weren’t many Lahori-Ahmadis in the world at that point anyway.  However, the Lahori-Ahmadis had control of mosques, they even built the first ever mosque in Germany.  The irony here, is that while Bashir Ahmad Misri’s father (Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri,) was serving as an Imam for the Lahori-Ahmadis in Pakistan, his son was snatching and destroying the Lahori-Ahmadis altogether.  The October 1964 issue of The Islamic Review is possibly the first in which his name is given as Joint Editor(see page 6).

1964–1967
He was the Imam of the Woking mosque up until roughly July of 1968.

January 1968
The struggle to its conversion to Sunni Muslims started in January 1968 by setting a Woking Mosque Regeneration Committee ,comprising Khalid Hussain Qamar (Woking), Moulana Habibur Rehman UK Islamic Mission ( Manchester), Allama Khalid Mehmood (executive director Manchester Mosque), Editor of Faran Magezine (Leicester), and Gondal( Reading). The committee wished to see High Commissioner of Pakistan , who was officially President of Registered Trust responsible for affairs of the Mosque, but all in vain for nine months. The state of the Mosque was miserable as there was no place for abolution, or taharat. There were no five times prayer established in the Mosque. Only on Sundays the Imam use to deliver a sermon to non Muslim visitors over a cup of tea. The Islamic Review magazine was regularly published from Shah Jehan Mosque as the only Muslim Organ under Editorship of Moulana Majeed Ahmad and Imam Hafiz BASHIR Ahmad Misri. Khalid Hussain Qamar started Quran Nazira lessons to 80 children of Sunni Muslims of Woking voluntarily with kind permission of the Imam in January 1968.

July 1968
On the 20th July 1968, he called a meeting of all the Muslim Organisations in the UK and Eire, at the East London Mosque. It was attended by more than a hundred delegates. he explained the situation to them that I was due to start on my tour by the end of the year and that Mirzais were trying their best to have their own Imam installed.

November 1968
Because of this permission, the Ahmadiyyah Movement terminated Hafiz Bashir Ahmed as Imam. Hafiz BASHIR Ahmad Misri, while leaving for Uganda authorised Khalid Hussain Qamar for arranging Traveeh Prayer during Ramadan first time ever in the history of the Mosque. Khalid Hussain Qamar (Woking), Chaudhary BASHIR Ahmad(Woking), and Raja Muhammad Asghar (Woking) availed this opportunity to install a new Imam for leading Traveeh Prayer while Hafiz BASHIR Ahmed Misri moved to Uganda as terminated Imam. Forceful capture of Mosque’s Residence and Mosque itself for prayers during Ramadan 1968 was beginning of Sunni Era of usage of the Mosque. That reached as blowing news to staff of Pakistan High Commissioner. Col Nazir Ahmed Dence Attachee and Haroon High Commissioner shown their concern about this possession. After one week of consistent request of the High Commissioner, Khalid Hussain Qamar along with local Muslims asked Col Nazir to visit them in the Mosque to resolve the issue. Woking Muslims presented the case that Mosque is to be natural worshipping place for local Muslims and therefore should be run along the wishes of local Muslims. Col Nazir agreed and requested the audience, let the High Commissioner offer them list of possible next Imams for their choice and High Commissioner could restore the official responsibility. So the First ever Sunni Imam (an employee of High Commissioner) Khawaja Qamar-Ud-Din took the charge as First Sunni Imam in December 1968. Since then the Mosque is in possession of Sunni Muslims.

1969–1989
He seems to have totally went missing from the records.

1979
His father (Sheikh Abdur Rahman Misri) dies in Pakistan.  He was a leading scholar and prolific writer of the Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement.

1989
He accepts the global Mubahila Challenge of Mirza Tahir Ahmad and writes about Ahmadiyya and his youth.  He explains how the Khalifa preyed on him sexually starting in 1932, which culminated in the death of Fakhr ud Din Multani.

———————————————————————————————————————————————

Some references about this incident from “Pope of Rabwah” by Mohammed Mazharuddin Multani

“”””On 6th August 1937, Khalifa Saheb delivered his last sermon on Friday in which his followers and warriors were roused pointing towards these persons (Multani, Bashir Masri etc.). The very next day on Saturday 7 August, around 4.30 pm at the time of Asr prayers Maulana Fakhruddin Saheb Multani, Hakeem Abdul Aziz Saheb and Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Masri Saheb (son of Shaikh Abdur Rehman Masri), all three were going towards police station, about 100 yards from the police station they were attacked by a sharp-edged weapon. This sharp-edged weapon went through the rib cage of Fakhruddin Saheb Multani and punctured his lung. Then Hakeem Abdul Aziz Saheb also received serious wounds on the mouth and cheeks through the same weapon.” (Pope of Rabwah p.52 by Mohammed Mazharuddin Multani)”“”

“”””Fakhruddin Multani was attacked in broad daylight and he was lying bleeding wriggling with pain at the gate of Khalifa’s Palace, but no one dared to attend him. Later some Muslims from Majlis-e-Ahrar (a Muslim organization dedicated to exposing the fraud of Ahmadiyyat) heard the news and they came and took the injured persons to Gurdaspur Hospital. Fakhruddin Multani died in the hospital on 13th August 1937. Amongst the 1000 Ahmadis living around the scene of crime, none could find the courage to give evidence against the culprits. Dr. Gurbakhsh Singh MBBS had his clinic in the same bazaar and he was an eyewitness of this incident. Although he was given lot of financial enticement, but the glitter of money could him stop him from giving evidence of the truth. Upon his evidence, Aziz Ahmad Qadiani was given capital punishment. Mirza Mehmud, 2nd Khalifa, offered his funeral prayer with great pomp, and labeled him a martyr of Ahmadiyyat. (Pope of Rabwah p.52 by Mohammed Mazharuddin Multani)“””

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

http://www.wokingmuslim.org/work/islamic-review/isrevconts-1968.pdf

See here—https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-accused-of-immoral-behavior-at-qadian-1938-he-calls-it-normal/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/21/bashir-ahmad-misri-and-ahmadiyya/

Misri Mubahila

http://www.irshad.org/brochures/bane.php

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/uk/light-apr07.pdf

http://www.shahjahanmosque.org.uk/imam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/07/in-1937-was-the-mirza-family-was-suffering-the-divine-the-wrath-of-their-false-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/29/mazhar-multani-son-of-fakhar-uddin-multani-wrote-3-books-vs-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/fakhar-ud-din-multani-on-his-death-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/new-data-on-the-murder-of-fakhar-ud-din-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/20/the-first-time-a-qadiani-ahmadi-murdered-a-muslim-for-criticizing-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1930/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Bashir Ahmad Misri and Ahmadiyya

Intro
He was born in Qadian in 1914, he was the Ahmadi who accused Mahmud Ahmad of sex crimes in Qadian in the 1936-37.  His father was Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri, who was a high-ranking Qadiani-Ahmadi-Imam in those days, in fact, he would sometimes serve as in-charge of Qadian when the Khalifa would be out of town.  Bashir Ahmad Misri and his friends (Fakhr ud Din Multani was murdered, he died a few days later) were attacked in broad day light in Qadian on Saturday, 08-07-1937, around 4:30 pm at the time of Asr prayers.  This led to his family asking for government and Muslim (the Ahrar’s) protection from the Mirza family.  They seem to have moved to Lahore in late 1937.  His father was hired as an Imam for the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.  However, Bashir Ahmad Misri joined Sunni-Islam in 1940 and moved to East Africa, wherein he seems to have worked as a teacher.  In 1961, he was allowed to move to London.  A few years later, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s hired him to be an editor.  It seems that Bashir Ahmad Misri was planning to make friends with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s and then to turn on them at an opportune time.  Which is exactly what he did.  In 1964, he became the Imam of the Woking Mosque.  By July 1968, his plan was in motion, he organized the local Muslim’s and wrestled control of the mosque from the Lahori-Ahmadi’s to the local Muslim scholars.  He them left and went on a tour.  His father died as a Lahori-Ahmadi in Pakistan in 1979.  Bashir Ahmad Misri then responded to Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s global Mubahila challenge in 1989 and wrote about his youth in Qadian.  His death year is unknown to us.

The Bane of Mirza-iyaat by Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Masri (1989)

Many of my friends requested me repeatedly to express my views about Mirzais in the light of my personal experiences, just to bring the matter on record. It is not possible here to go into details. A full account would need a book of great volume. This short article, therefore, contains only a synoptic record of the events which led to my denunciation of this heterodoxical and hypocritical creed.

I was born in Qadian in 1914 – an unfortunate accident of birth which has been hanging round my neck like an albatross throughout the 73 years of my life. As a child I was indoctrinated into believing that the rest of the Muslims were nonbelievers (kaafirs) – so much so that even belief in God and in Islam was conditional to belief in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (the founder of this movement) as a prophet and, after him, belief in his successors as the so-called Khalifas of Islam.

However, as I grew up, I found around me a society which was, by and large, insidiously fraudulent. Of course, there were a few elderly people among them who had joined the Movement during the early period of its inception in good faith, under the misconception that it was a genuine ‘Reform Movement’ within Islam. Such sincere and faithful few, however, were either too simple-minded to notice what was going on around them or were totally helpless to do anything about it..

As a teenager, I was not capable of grasping mentally the significance of the theological sabotage, which this Movement had started committing on Islam. My initial reaction against these people was on moral and ethical grounds. It was at this stage of mental and spiritual immaturity that fate decided to throw me into the furnace of infernal fire, as if to test my metal.

I was a healthy and athletic young man of man of about 18 when I received a message from the then Head (Khalifah) that he wanted to see me for some confidential matter. That was the period when I held this man as a demigod and, naturally, felt greatly honoured by the invitation. I just guessed that he wanted to assign to me some religious errand of a confidential nature.

This first meeting remained very formal – the Khalifah asking me various personal questions and I answering them with all the due respect. I was ‘commanded’ not to tell anyone about our meeting and was given an appointment for the next. The subsequent meetings however became informal, leading up to an invitation to join an ‘Inner Circle’.

This ‘demigod’ was in reality running a secret circle of fornication, adultery, incest and general debauchery. For this, he had organised a clique of pimps and procuresses. Most of the young man and women who were seduced were selected from such families as were economically dependent or fanatically brain-washed and for various other reasons, were incapable of putting up any resistance. There were occasional cases of defiance, but they were easily silenced by the weapons of boycott, excommunication, systemic vilification and ostracism.

The Mirza Family was not only the spiritual head of the community but was also the owner of most of the land in and around the town of Qadian, as Feudal Lords. Apart from religious alliance there was no security of the tenure of land for those families who had burned their boats to settle in the so-called ‘sacred precincts’ of Qadian. Under such circumstances it was unthinkable in those days for any one to fight back. Quite a few of those who did try to revolt met with apparently accidental deaths or simply vanished in thin air without trace. While all this was going on, Muslim theologians, in their naivety, thought that they could defeat Mirzaiyat on the debating platforms and only by doctrinal arguments.

The first effect on me, after coming in contact with these dregs of vice, was that of stuporous helplessness. I still remember many a wakeful night when I used too wet my pillow with silent tears. I could not tell my parents, not being sure whether they would believe me. Neither could I discuss it with my friends for fear of being betrayed. One easy way out for me could have been to leave Qadian and disappear. This would have, however, meant discontinuation of my studies in the University. Also, there was the sense of responsibility that I should not desert my parents, leaving them in ignorance of this filth.

There were times when the idea of putting an end to all this by murdering the perpetrator of this pious fraud would become very tempting. However, even at that immature age, logic prevailed. Firstly, I reasoned that it would be misunderstood by the society at large as an act of a religious fanatic and this man will go down in history as a martyr. Secondly, I thought, a quick sudden death for a man like him would be a boon instead of a chastisement which he deserved, not only for committing these atrocities but for committing them in the name of God and religion. The subsequent events proved my reasoning right. He was later crippled by paralysis ad died a miserably lingering death. A doctor who attended him during his protracted illness told me that, during the last stages, he had become a mental imbecile, babbling filthy obscenities.

In addition to all these considerations, there was another reason why I thought any direct action would be futile. I had come to realise that this corruption would not end by this man’s death. It was not only this one man who had turned into a sex maniac. His brothers and most of the other members of the Mirza Family were no better. Even the elite order in this community’s religious hierarchy, holding responsible positions under the camouflage of flowing beards, had their own ‘enclaves of depravity’, with the tacit understanding among them: “you don’t ruffle my beard and I won’t yours”. As a matter of fact, in the Establishment of this organisation, only those were promoted to high positions who had fallen in line with this family’s lifestyle – the family who they have the audacity of calling ‘the prophet’s family’. It was not surprising that the news of such amorous licentiousness spread around from mouth to mouth and play-boys from rich families started joining this ‘Reform Movement’ to seek freedom from the strictures of the then sexual discipline of the Asian culture, and so on…..

Since my alienation from the Khalifah’s ‘inner circle’, my life had been constantly in danger. His mafia-like thugs started shadowing me. In desperation, I decided to take the bull by the horns, went to the Khalifah and showed him a long letter in which I had recorded all the details of his private life with names, dates, facts and figures. I told him that sealed copies of that letter had been deposited with some persons in authority, instructing them to open the letters only in case if my death or disappearance. From then on, I felt safe and walked about freely in the streets of Qadian.

The more I saw of this corruption the more I became sick of religion, one and all, till ultimately I ended up as an atheist. This morbid phase of my life, however, left a spiritual vacuum with which I could not cope on my own, and I had to tell my father. It came to him as a great shock. Naturally, he could not accept the word of a young boy without corroboration and started making discreet inquiries. It did not take him long to be convinced that I was telling the truth.

My father wrote a very long letter to this so-called Khalifah, asking him for an explanation of his conduct and demanding his abdication. There was no reply, but two reminders afterwards, the Khalifah declared that Shaikh Abdul-Rehman Masri (my father) and all members of his family had been expelled and excommunicated. These three letters were later published in India .

This excommunication in practice meant complete boycott and social dissociation. Our lives were so much in danger that the Government had to detail twenty-four hours guard of military police around our house. No member of our family could go out without a police escort. In spite of all such precautions, I and two of my companions were attacked in broad daylight in the bazaar. One elderly companion was stabbed in the chest and died. The other was stabbed in the neck and shoulder and had to remain in hospital for quite a long period. I managed to fight back and succeeded in giving such a blow on the skull of my assailant with a cudgel, which I was carrying, that he started bleeding. The wounded assailant was whisked away to a hiding place by his accomplices, but the police caught up with him by following the blood drops from his skull. He was later founded guilty of murder and hanged. Such was the flagrant disdain of law and order in Qadian that the murderer’s funeral service was held with great pomp and show, the Khalifah himself leading the prayer.

After this incident a Muslim organisation known as ‘Majlis-e-Ahrar-ul-Islam’, started sending squads of volunteers to guard our house, in addition to the military police. They pitched their tents in the open fields around our bungalow, which started looking like a besieged fortress.

The Mirzai Administration started involving my father in trumped-up court cases to discredit his high repute for uprightness, as well as to drain his meagre savings. In short, all sorts of dirty tricks were played to make life impossible for him. To support his family with eleven children, he had to sell the family jewellery and chattel. The most unfortunate of these disasters which befell our family during this period was the setback to the education of children. All the details of these attacks and persecution used to be published in Indian Press.

There was a great pressure on our family, both from the Government and others to leave Qadian and we ultimately migrated to Lahore . My father joined the Lahori Party. Although there is not much difference between their beliefs and those of Qadianis, at least their society was not riddled with moral corruption. I, however, kept myself unattached. As I have said earlier, I had lost faith in the very institution of religion. However during this period I started coming in contact with the leaders of Ahrar, who had a profound effect on me. Among them were Sayed Ataullah Shah Bukhari, Maulana HabiburRehman Ludhianvi, Chaudhari Afzal Haque, Maulana Mazhar Ali Azhar – I found these people devout Muslims and very sincere friends.

My father had accepted my atheism only with ostensible resignation. While at heart he was very unhappy about it. He told me that he prayed for me regularly and used to ask me to seek God’s guidance through prayer. My answer to that used to be that he was asking me to pray to a Being who did not exist. Finally after lengthy discussions, he started advising me to make my prayers conditional and started to pray in words such as: “God if you exist, give me some indication of it; otherwise if per chance you do exist don’t blame me for not believing in You……”

Although this kind of prayer might sound blasphemous to the real believers, it produced esoteric results for me. Within about a year of praying. I saw two dreams in quick succession. Since they are very much of a personal and subjective nature, I dare not relate them here. Suffice it to say that they especially the second dream, were of long duration, very explicit and coherent. Even for a sinful man like me there remained no room for doubt that there did exist a Supreme Being whom we call God or Allah, I may mention though that in the concluding part of the dream I was shown the Mirzai Khalifah as a depraved miscreant with a heinously tarred face.

After these dreams I felt much relieved. It seemed as if my spiritual crisis was over. I decided to turn a new leaf and become a Muslim formally. The late Sayyed Ataullah Shah Bukhari took me along to Maulana Mohammed Ilyas (the founder of the Tablighi Jamaat ) in a village called Mehroli, a few miles from Delhi . There, in 1940, I took my oath of fealty to Islam (Bai’at) at his hand. It was a blissful coincidence that the Sheikh al Hadith of India Maulana Muhammed Zakariyah also happened to be present, after the sunset (Maghirib) prayers, led by Maulana Ilyas, all the congregation of about 40 worshippers said a special prayer for me.

In 1941 migrated to East Africa with the mixed feelings of relief and guilt. Standing on the deck of the steamer in the Bombay harbor, I stated reciting under my breath the following Quranic Verse: “And what reason have you not to fight for the cause of Allah to help those weak men and women who are crying out: Our Lord take us out of this town whose people are oppressors”. (Al Nisa 4:75)

After 20 years stay in Africa I migrated to England in 1961.

THE IMAMATE IN WOKING

In 1964 I was appointed as the Imam of the Shah Jehan Mosque in Woking , England . This appointment calls for some explanation for record. This mosque was built by an orientalist, Dr. Leitner in 1889 with funds from Muslims in India and later, a Trust was formed to run it. That was the period when Mirzaiyat had not shown itself fully in its true colours and the Trust readily agreed to hand over the management of the mosque to the Lahori section of this Movement

By nineteen sixties quite a few Muslim Organisations had established themselves in the United Kingdom and the pressure started increasing for this Mosque to be reverted to its originally intended position of an Islamic Center. I was approached by the Secretary and the Treasurer of the Trust to accept the Imamate. I made it clear to them that I was a Sunni Muslim and showed them copies of some published articles, which I had written against Mirzaiyat. They told me that they were aware of my views and that they considered it as an asset. They also assured me that the High Commissioner of Pakistan, who was the ex-officio Chairman of the Trust and who would sign the letter of my appointment, had given his blessings.

After taking charge of the Mosque, it soon became obvious to me that I was being branded by the general Muslims as a Mirzai. For the last about three-quarters of a century there had been a successive line of Mirzai Imams. Muslims could not believe that all of a sudden a Sunni Imam would appear out of the blue, I found myself falling between two stools. My theological differences with both the Lahori and the Qadiani sections were irreconcilable; while the Muslims took it for granted that I must be a Mirzai, otherwise I would not have been appointed. It took me long to win over the trust of some Muslim religious leaders in the UK.

It had been my life long ambition to tour the Islamic countries by car, so that I could travel even into the rural areas and study first hand how they were transacting their religious affairs in practice. (This tour took me about three years covering 45,000 miles in more than 40 countries). Before leaving the Mosque however, I wanted to make sure that this far-famed Mosque and the Islamic Center remained in the Muslim hands permanently. There were only two or three Mirzai members on the Board of Trustees, but they were very active and wielded a great influence. They were leaving no stone unturned to bring back a Mirzai Imam after I had left.

After long discussions and consultations with my Muslim friends, I called a meeting of all the Muslim Organisations in the UK and Eire , on the 20thJuly 1968 , at the East London Mosque. It was attended by more than a hundred delegates. I explained the situation to them that I was due to start on my tour by the end of the year and that Mirzais were trying their best to have their own Imam installed.

There was one very important legal point, which was to prove helpful to us in the tug of war, which ensued. According to a clause of the trust deed, the legal status of the Mirzais, from the very beginning had been that of tenants of the Trust which could be terminated. This clause had remained unnoticed by the Muslims until I pointed it out to them. At this meeting it was decided unanimously to form a “Woking Mosque Regeneration Committee” which should take over the physical possession of the Mosque under protest, and appoint an adhoc Muslim Imam after my departure. I0t further resolved the Mosque Trust should be asked to expel all its Mirzai members on the Board and never to appoint a Mirzai Imam again. It was in these circumstances that, in November 1968, I handed over the Mosque to Muslims and left England on my tour,

The general impression among the non Muslims is that our opposition to Mirzaiyat stems from religious intolerance. They fail to appreciate the fact that apart from doctrinal differences, this clique is being used by the anti-Islamic powers as collaborators in the promotion of their political and economic interests throughout Muslim world. On top of all this there is a growing apprehension among the Muslims that the pattern of Qadiani libertinism is liable to corrode the moral fabric of Muslim youth.

Al-Hafiz B. A. Masri
March 1989

http://wiki.qern.org/ahmadiyya/ahmadiyya-as-a-cult/prominent-people-who-left-the-cult/bashir-ahmad-masri

Read the response by the Lahori-Ahmadi scholar, Dr. Zahid Aziz here: http://ahmadiyya.org/uk/light-apr07.pdf

And also read this:

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-accused-of-immoral-behavior-at-qadian-1938-he-calls-it-normal/

Who is Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri?

Intro
He was the father of Bashir Ahmad Misri, the Ahmadi who accused Basherruddin Mahmud Ahmad of sexual crimes and etc.  Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri , was a very devoted companion of Hazrat Masih Maud AS. He was converted to Islam from hinduism, specifically from the Aryas.  Mirza Masroor Ahmad mentioned a brief account of the life of Shaikh Abdur Rehman Misri here.  He was a very learned scholar of Ahmadiyya, a most trusted follower of Mirza Mahmud Ahmad, the Khalifa Sani.  He was the Head Master of Talim-ul-Islam High School in Qadian.  Mirza Mahmud Ahmed used to appoint him qaim maqaam Amir-e-Maqami when he was away from Qadian.

During the Khilafat of Maulana Noor Ud Din (1908–1914)
Shaikh Abdul Rehman Misri sahib went to Egypt (MISR) to attend AL-AZHAR UNIVERSITY. This is how Shaikh Abdul Rehman Misri sahib came be known as MISRI. When he returned from Egypt, Maulana Noor Ud Din sahib had already passed away and Movement was split in two groups.

1914
He sided with the Mirza family and remained in Qadian.

1916
He was sent by the Khalifa as a delegation to speak to Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi about his decision to join the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.

1918
He travelled with the Khalifa to Lahore and further, the Khalifa was sick and was seeking treatment, he was only 28-29 years old.

Summer of 1937
His son, Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri tells him that the Khalifa is immoral and is running an underground pedophilia ring in Qadian.  Sheikh Abdur Rahman Misri sahib accused Mirza Mahmood Ahmad sahib for sexually assaulting his young son, Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri, and requested him to either set up a Commission of Inquiry, or face a challenge of Mubahalah to clear his name.

August 1937
Fukhr ud Din Multani, Bashir Ahmad Misri and one other Ex-Ahmadi are attacked in broad daylight in Qadian.  Multani ended up dying a few days later in the hospital.  The witnesses refused to testify against the Ahmadi’s.  Nevertheless, the Ahmadi was convicted of murder and thus executed by the British Government.

September 1937
Shaikh Abdur Rahman Misri asks for government-police and Muslim (the Ahrar’s) protection from the Mirza family while still living in Qadian.  They seem to have moved to Lahore in late 1937.  His father was hired as an Imam for the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.

1938
After leaving Qadian, the Lahori-Ahmadis hired him as a Mullah and etc, he began reminding Qadiani-Ahmadis of his stature with MGA and his marriage, which MGA had arranged.

1946
Per Lahori-Ahmadi sources, he was a teacher in the Lahori-Jamia-College.  This was the Lahori-Ahmadi prepatory school for new imam’s.

1964
His son, Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri becomes the Imam of the Lahori-managed mosque of the Woking.

1965
He also helped Mumtaz Ahmad Faruqi write the famous Truth Triumphs book (1965), which exposed the Qadianis.

Interestingly in Urdu section of said book in introduction Mumtaz Ahmad Faruqui sahib writes on page 5:

“””Here I want to thank Maulana Shaikh Abdur Rehman Misri sahib and Maulvi Abdul Mannan Omar sahib M.A. They read manuscript of this book and gave helpful advice, and made some corrections. May Allah SWT reward them.”””

1968
His son, Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri snatches the Woking Mosque by force with the help of Sunni-Muslims and places it into the control of the local Muslim community, thus, destroying Lahori-Ahmadism all over the world.

1979
He dies as a Lahori-Ahmadi.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Shaikh Abdur Rahman Misri narrated traditions about MGA:
(Seeratul Mahdi Volume 1 page 196)

(183) Stated to me by Shaikh Abdurehman Misri that the day he had reached Qadian for the first time, Shaikh Rehmatullah Lahori had also arrived from Lahore on that day along with a Christian young man. Both of us were presented before Hazrat Sahib (MGAQ). Hazrat Sahib accepted my Baiyat but refused to accept the BAYIAT of that christian boy despite the fact he was recommended by Shaikh Rehamatullah who was a Big Shot in the jamaat and a blue eyed of Hazrat saib.

The Christian boy wrote to Hazrat Sahib for BAIYAT again but he refused and said we will do it on some other day. Then he wrote third time to hazrat sahib requesting him to fix a date for his Baiyat but Hazart sb refused it again. Hazrat sahib said your Baiyat will be accepted on Thursday and it was Monday on that day. The reply from Hazrat Sahib disappointed him and that man turned back to become Christian again. Subsequently, someone said Hazrat Sahib that young man became christian again, he said well i was expecting this from him that is why I had delayed it.

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-accused-of-immoral-behavior-at-qadian-1938-he-calls-it-normal/

http://ahmadiyya.org/uk/light-apr07.pdf

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/hope/2008/hope200801_syedmuhammadahsanamrohiaddressmga.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/08/27/zahid-aziz-vs-bashir-ahmad-misri/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/mirza-masroor-ahmad-mentioned-shaikh-abdur-rehman-al-misri-on-24th-july-2015/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/bashir-ahmad-misris-mubahila-with-mirza-tahir-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-bashir-ahmad-misri/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/21/bashir-ahmad-misri-and-ahmadiyya/

Scans

 

He wrote many books, they exist on the Lahori Website, see here:

Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri:

When Khwaja Kamaluddin arrived in England (1912)

Intro
Khwaja Kamaluddin is the famous Lahori-Ahmadi who arrived in England in 1912 and began converting people in the UK to Islam, as well as leading prayers at the famous Woking Mosque.  This was an Ahmadi mosque until the late 1960’s, when Bashir Misri became imam, and then signed it over to the Sunni Community in the London area.  The lahori-Ahmadi’s lost the Woking Mosque and were never able to acquire another mosque in the UK.

24th September 1912
It was the day when Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din arrived in England for the first time. During this first visit, which lasted till August 1914, he established “The Islamic Review” monthly journal and the Woking Muslim Mission in 1913.

Data from the Lahori blog editor Zahid Aziz
As the website creator and maintainer of the website www.wokingmuslim.org I felt it my duty to mark the 100th anniversary of Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din’s arrival. I have compiled an 8-page commemorative leaflet, with a 4-page insert of photographs that can go inside the leaflet, for this occasion. I hope it is interesting and informative.

Zahid Aziz’s comments on Bashir Ahmad Misri

(1) An interview on this very subject which a Harvard University researcher conducted with me face to face in 2007. See page 7 of the May 2007 issue of “The Light”, U.K. edition at this link.

(2) An article I wrote at the same time in refutation of B.A. Misri’s account is in the April 2007 issue from pages 4 to 7, at this link.

light-apr07

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Sialkot #Mosqueattack

Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad was accused of immoral behavior at Qadian (1938)–he calls it normal

Intro
Ahmadis are fond of making silly and stupid parallels.  In the 1930’s, when Mahmud Ahmad was accused of homosexuality and other sex crimes in Qadian by Bashir Misri, he defended himself by saying that ALL holy people are accused of sexual mis-conduct by their followers. This argument sufficed for the poor and ignorant followers of Mahmud Ahmad, however, the Lahori-Ahmadis soon chimed in and objected to Mahmud Ahmad’s arguments.  Muhammad Ali wrote this letter in 1938, however, he didn’t mention the murder of Fakhr-ud-Din Multani, which had happened in August of 1937.

Appendix in Mumtaz Ahmad Faruqi’s book, Truth Triumphs

Peculiar Technique of Self exoneration

Mudslinging Against the Righteous

Al-Fazl published a Friday Sermon by Mian Mahmud Ahmad Sahib in its issue dated December 2, 1938.  As usual Mian Sahib commented on the opening chapter of the Quran “the Fatiha”.  This time the caption was, “Sheikh Abdur Rahman’s dark vituperation and Maulvi Muhammad Ali Sahib”.  In this connection, my only fault is that I referred to a printed decision of the High Court, which contained serious allegations against Mian Sahib by his former follower.  In my Friday sermon, I said that in the times of Hazrat Mirza Sahib, Qadian enjoyed reputation for the righteous and piety, but now it is known all over the world for something else.  Mian Sahib has given vent to great fury.  The deplorable aspect of the whole matter is that Mian Sahib is at pains to prove that even during the times of Hazrat Sahib, the reputation of Qadian did not arise from piety and purity and that even in those days also, enemies apart, the followers (God Forbid) levelled charges against Hazrat Sahib similar to those now levelled against Mian Sahib. 

Not content with this, he goes on further.  He holds that even the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of God be upon him) had to face similar dark allegations from his disciples. 

This is Mian Sahib’s peculiar technique of self-exoneration.  He scandalizes the righteous in self-defence.  I have no doubt that there are evil-minded people who fling allegations without rhyme or reason.  But one may ascertain from the old Ahmadies and non-Ahmadies whether or not it is a fact that the people who came to Qadian, used to first contact the enemies to gather knowledge about Hazrat Mirza Sahib before taking the oath of fealty.  The visitors always found that even the enemies both, Muslims and Hindus, were convinced of the piety and righteousness of Hazrat Sahib, despite their hostility on grounds of creedal differences.  Even the enemies did not assail the character of Hazrat Sahib.  Thus the question of a follower finding fault with his character did not arise at all as it is in the case of Mian Sahib.  It pains me to learn that Mian Sahib repudiates these irrefutable facts.  He is now consoling his followers in the distant parts of the world, by telling them that even during Hazrat Sahib’s time, people harbored doubts and suspicions against the character of Hazrat sahib, as his own (Mian Sahib’s) enemies and followers do about him.  Mian Sahib may spin a long yarn in his sermons.  He may indulge in verbal jugglery to camouflage facts.  But no historian can deny two evident events.  The first is that there is a world of difference between Qadian of 40 years ago and the Qadian of today.  Qadian, 40 years ago was the Qadian which Sir Muhammad Iqbal regarded as a specimen as it then was a synonym for piety and righteousness.  But today its character is such as even friends shed tears and keep quiet.  It is because it has fallen into the abyss of degradation and ill fame.  This has spread to the nook and corner of the world. 

Mian Sahib hurled a threat at me under the caption of “Maulvi Muhammad Ali and his family”, and declared that he could take revenge by scandalizing me and that he would do it.  My submission in this connection is that if scandal-mongering against me and my family can confer exoneration on him, he is perfectly welcome to do so.  He may use this recipe.  He may abuse me in any manner he likes.  But for God’s sake, he should desist from embroiling the Promised Messiah.  In his sermon, Mian Sahib says, “The allegations which Misri Sahib is levelling against me, are the same which some men of his (Hazrat Sahib’s Community used to level against the Promised Messiah”. 

What a heinous scandal!  This dark lie has been hurled in a Friday Sermon from a pulpit, just to cast a veil on his own failings.  There are statements made in the courts.  Let alone Misri sahib! Here in his (Mian sahib’s) case there is a long line of followers beginning from Maulvi Abdul Karim of Mubahila who levelled allegations against his character.  If there is even a grain of truth in what Mian Sahib says about the Promised Messiah, he should arise and publish a poster or statement in which any follower of Hazrat Sahib levelled such a charge as has been levelled against him. I have abstained from repeating these allegations.  But I now quote them as Mian Sahib himself has published them in Al-Fazl and which hold the Promised Messiah as a target of impious allegations:

“The present Khalifah is licentious.  Under the guise of holiness, he is a womanizer.  He has employed some men and women as agents for this purpose.  Through them, he entraps the innocent boys and girls.  He has set up a society which compromises men and women.  They indulge in adultery.”

Mian sahib may beguile and satisfy his followers in any manner he likes best.  But there is not an iota of truth in the dark lie that some members of the Lahore section of Ahmadiyya Movement ever levelled any such allegation against the Promised Messiah.  If Mian sahib has any proof in support of his stunt, he may boldly come out into the open. 

The Promised Messiah is in a class by himself.  Mian Sahib has presumed that, God forbid, all the righteous people have been accused of low moral character.  This is why he has not spared even the holy person of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of God be upon him) and has declared that even he was the victim of such dark accusations by his disciples.  In this strain he says:

“Perhaps they think that we alone are being abused and we alone are the people who are subjected to such vituperations, whereas, the fact is that, the scandal mongers set afloat such things against Jesus Christ and they were his followers.  They propagated scandals against the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of God be upon him) and they were his followers.  Thus eminent personalities had to face such allegations from their followers.  This being the case, neither my community nor I, nor for the matter of that anyone else can escape such accusations.”

The question of Prophet Moses and Prophet Jesus apart.  We have before our eyes all the events in the life of the Holy Prophet in the historical perspective.  Is there any Muslim who levelled such charges against the Holy Prophet as have been levelled against Mian Sahib?  That the Holy Prophet’s sacred person was above and beyond calumny is an irrefutable fact and the enemies were challenged thus:

“I have indeed lived among you a life-time before this.  Will you not understand? (10:17)

It meant that even the enemies could not find fault with him.  Is it at all thinkable that the Muslims could or would do it? I ask: Did his (The holy prophet’s) followers (as vainly asserted by Mian Sahib) regard him (the Holy Prophet), God forbid, as of objectional character, as the followers of Mian Sahib regard him by levelling accusations against him?  We there any devoted disciple, who said about him that he is a woman chaser?  Does this technique confer any exoneration on Mian Sahib?  If this technique is tenable to them every evil-doer and a criminal can advance this plea in his defence. 

Mian sahib had to take recourse to this erratic course, because he had abandoned the right course.  He has consoled himself with the idea that a guilty person can claim exoneration by accusing another man.  He may or may not admit.  But it is a fact that such charges were levelled against him as simply aspersions on Qadian and the Promised Messiah.  If I had been in Mian Sahib’s place I would have met Maulvi Abdul Karim’s (of Mubahila) challenge by immediately denying on oath the charge, not for my own sake but for the sake of Qadian and the Promised Messiah.  This was the straight course for exoneration which Mian Sahib did not adopt.  Misri Sahib made a demand which was rather difficult. But in view of the disgrace that the rejection of his demand has brought in its wake, it is much easier to accept it and set up an independent Commission to investigate the matter.  After all the followers of Mian Sahib were bound to be the members of this commission.  Nobody could assert that they would give an adverse verdict against their religious leader without rigorously sifting the evidence.  On the contrary their verdict would have been the same as is evident from their professions that even if they were to see Mian Sahib behaving in an objectionable manner they would belie their eyes.  The adoption of this formal technique would have settled the whole affair within the four walls of Qadian.  This would have saved the community the disgrace it is suffering at the moment.

Mian sahib’s assertion that the authors of the accusations, are not his followers because they differ with him on the question of Khilafat, is wrong.  In the first instance this dissension on khilafat, arose because they detected serious drawbacks in the person of the Khalifa himself.  There was no such dissension before this discovery.  Moreover, Mian Sahib had solemnly declared that no one could take Ba’it even if one did not see eye to eye with him in certain matters.  This being his declared formula that even such people may be regarded as his followers, as call the people Muslims, whereas Mian Sahib regards them as Kafirs.  Even such people also are his followers who impute kufr to people whom Mian Sahib regards as Muslims. 

As for the accusers they had been his followers for years together and were very close to him.  After all it is the duty of Mian sahib to explain why they have levelled against him such charges as one does not ordinarily level against one’s enemies. 

I regret to say that I had to waste my time on this vexed issue.  I am perfectly conscious of the fact that the Muslims are dissipating their energies in undoing each other on very petty issues.  This is why their resistance against their genuine enemies is growing weak.  I have always striven to see that my Jamaat should be devoted single-minded to countering the activities of the enemies of Islam.  If Mian Sahib had restricted his vituperations against my person only I would have kept my peace.  But as he tried to defend his person by assailing the holy person of the Holy Prophet, I had no other alternative but to take up pen in defence of the Holy Prophet.  I do not claim to sinlessness.  I am a weak human being and pray for the mercy of God. 

Lahore
December 8, 1938                                                     Muhammad Ali

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/01/15/in-qadian-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-allowed-to-touch-all-women/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/21/bashir-ahmad-misri-and-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/07/in-1937-was-the-mirza-family-was-suffering-the-divine-the-wrath-of-their-false-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/29/mazhar-multani-son-of-fakhar-uddin-multani-wrote-3-books-vs-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/fakhar-ud-din-multani-on-his-death-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/new-data-on-the-murder-of-fakhar-ud-din-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/20/the-first-time-a-qadiani-ahmadi-murdered-a-muslim-for-criticizing-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1930/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam   

 

Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s open Mubahila to the world world, June 10th, 1988

Intro
Ahmadi’s are always looking for trouble.  They play like they are victims, just for asylum and other perks from the colonist.  As soon as Mirza Tahir Ahmad became Khalifa, be began radicalizing Ahmadi’s.  On June 10th, 1988, Mirza Tahir Ahmad challenged all the Muslims in the world to a death match (Mubahila).  He quoted MGA’s open challenge of 1907, from Haqiqatul Wahy.  Mirza Tahir Ahmad radicalized Ahmadi’s and invited danger upon every single Ahmadi in Pakistan and the world with this announcement.  Interestingly enough, Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri responded to this open Mubahila.  Ahmadi’s also claim that this Mubahila was directed at Zia Ul Haq, who died in an aircraft explosion on August 17th, 1988.  Nevertheless, ever since 1988, Ahmadi’s celebrate the deaths of Zia ul Haq, King Faisal, Bhutto and indirectly, a U.S. ambassador to Pakistan, Arnold Lewis Raphel and and General Herbert M. Wassom, the head of the US Military aid mission to Pakistan.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s Mubahila in 1889, vs. Batalvi
In an incident which has tried to be hidden by Ahmadi editors, we found that MGA had issued a Mubahila vs. Batalvi in November of 1889.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s comments on Mubahila in 1890
MGA wrote that it was impossible for 2 Muslims to have a Mubahila with each others.

Links and Related Essays
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Zia-ul-Haq

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/02/ahmadis-celebrate-the-death-of-arnold-lewis-raphel/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/bashir-ahmad-misris-mubahila-with-mirza-tahir-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/29/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-rules-on-mubahila-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/07/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-mubahila-in-1889-with-syed-muhammad-hussain-batalvi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/03/11/ahmadis-celebrate-the-death-of-king-faisal-bhutto-and-zia/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/06/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-his-mubahila-with-abdul-haq-1891-1900/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/30/was-there-a-mubahila-between-muhammad-saw-and-abu-jahl-mga-says-so/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/28/mirza-tahir-ahmad-radicalized-ahmadis-in-the-80s/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/evidence-which-proves-that-mirza-tahir-ahmad-radicalized-ahmadis-as-soon-as-he-came-to-power-1982/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Up ↑