Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"Karam"

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad vs. Maulvi Karam Din–Court Case 1903–1905, references from the 2009 edition of Tadhkirah and some other sources

Intro
MGA lost one court case against him in his career.  It is the case of MGA vs. Karam ud Din.  I have collected some bits and pieces of info here.   In January 1903, on behalf of Moulvi Karam Deen of Bheen District Jhelum, and Moulvi Faqeer Mohammad, Editor of Sirajul Akhbaar Jhelum, Hadhrat Sheikh Yaqoob Ali Editor of Al Hakam and Hadhrat Hakeem Fazal-ud-Deen of Bhera who were being sued in connection with a booklet, ‘Saif Chishtian’ by Peer Mehar Ali who was custodian of the Goalrah Shrine.  On Oct-16th, 1903, MGA left Qadian for Gurdaspur (see NOV/DEC-1903—ROR).  MGA and Hakeem Fazal Din lost this case in 1904 (exact date unknown), and were about to be thrown in jail, however, they made bail (700 rupees) and were released.  About a year later, they won on appeal in early 1905.  It was a Judge european Judge named Mr. Hurry, he was the sessions judge of Amritsar.

Related Essay’s and links
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=above+the+law

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/The-Afghan-Martyrs-by-B.A.Rafiq.pdf

https://books.google.com/books?id=zU0TAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA126&lpg=RA1-PA126&dq=Mr.+Hurry+sessions+judge+amritsar&source=bl&ots=b-HwffLt3K&sig=ibucVQ6ZbEaZNeWMfet-uQ6LYSU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwia2ben_dndAhVwIDQIHSTZDe0Q6AEwBHoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=Mr.%20Hurry%20sessions%20judge%20amritsar&f=false

The Criminal Law Journal of India: A Monthly Legal Publication …, Volume 2


Some important references
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)

Pages 570-572
December 6, 1902
(A) Last night I was in such a state that if I had not received Divine revelation, I would have been proved right in thinking that my last moment had arrived. While I was in this condition, I was overtaken by sleep and saw in my dream that I was in a cul-de-sac and three buffaloes (636)
were coming towards me. When one of them approached me I beat it away and the same happened with the second one. Then the third advanced towards me. I felt that it was so
strong that there was no way of deliverance from it. While this was passing through my mind, Allah the Almighty so ordained that it turned away. Taking advantage of this I slipped through brushing against it and began to run. I was thinking that it would be running after me but I did not look back. Then the following Prayer was inspired by Allah the Almighty in a dream upon my heart:

637–Arabic O my Lord everything serves You. So O my Lord, protect me and help me and have mercy on me. [Publishers]

638--al-Hakam, vol. 6, December 10, 1902, p. 10, reports that the Promised Messiahas said:
This prayer is an amulet and protection… I will henceforth make this supplication regularly in my Prayers, and you should also do it.

He also said:

The greatest matter in it, which teaches the True Unity—that is, assures that Allah the Glorious alone can cause any harm or impart any benefit—is that it teaches us that [O Allah] everything is in Your service, and no harmful thing can cause any damage without Your will and permission.

It was conveyed to me that this is the great name of God and that whoever supplicates in these terms would be delivered from every affliction. [al-Badr, vol. 1, no. 7, December 12, 1902, p. 54 and al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 44, December 10, 1902, p. 10].

(B) Of the Signs shown in my favour is one in which God, the All-Knowing and the Wise, informed me about a mean person and his great calumny against me and apprised me through His revelation that this man would attack me in order to humiliate me, but would himself become my target in the end. Allah the Almighty conveyed this to me in the course of three dreams. He disclosed to me in a dream that this enemy of mine would engage three helpers in my opposition to achieve success in his proceedings to dishonour me and to put me to trouble. I was shown in a dream that I was hauled into court like a prisoner but I was shown that I would be delivered in the end, though after an interval. I was also given the good news that the affliction would be reverted upon this lying mean enemy of mine himself.…. Then I began to wait for the developments as indicated in the prophecy. After the passing of a year, all this happened at the instance of Karam Din. (That is, he brought unjustified criminal charges against me).639 [Haqiqatul-Wahi, p. 215, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, p. 225].   

639—This Sign was originally published by the Promised Messiahas in Mawahib-ur Rahman in Arabic and Persian. Later, in Haqiqatul-Wahi, he published the same in Urdu. Our English rendering is based upon the Urdu citation in Haqiqatul-Wahi. [Munawar Ahmed Saeed]
________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 582

January 13, 1903
655—-[Arabic] I shall humiliate him who designs to humiliate you. I shall help him who designs to help you. You have a high standing in My Presence. I have chosen you for Myself and your secret is My secret. You are with Me and I am with you and your secret is My
secret. When you are angry, I am angry and when you love, I also   love. You are to me like My Unity and My Uniqueness. So the time has come when you should be helped and be known among people. Allah praises you from His Throne. Allah praises you and is walking towards you. You have a high standing in My Presence. I have chosen you for Myself and your secret is My secret. You have a standing with Me of which the people have no knowledge. O My
Ahmad, you are My purpose and are with Me. You are with Me and I am with you. Your secret is My secret. When you are angry, I am angry and everyone you love, I love. You have a high standing in My Presence. I have chosen you for Myself. [Publishers].

[Notebook of the Revelations of the Promised Messiahas, p. 1]

He has given me good news and said:

656—[Arabic] I shall not leave a trace of anything which might be designed to humiliate you. [Publishers]

and He said:

657—[Arabic] Allah will safeguard you Himself and He is the Most Gracious Friend. [Publishers]

[Mawahibur-Rahman, p. 17, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 19, p. 235]
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 583-584

January 15, 1903
While in Lahore I received, repeatedly, the revelation: That is [Arabic] I shall show you My blessings from every side.658 [al-Hakam, vol. 7, no. 4, January 31, 1903, p. 15 and al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 1–2, January 23–30, 1903, p. 9].

658-–This prophecy was fulfilled in this wise* that when I approached Jhelum about ten thousand people came to see me. The road was choked with people in all sorts of humble attitudes as if they wanted to prostrate themselves. Then there was such a multitude of people around the District Courts that the Magistrates were greatly surprised. Eleven hundred men and two hundred women made the bai‘at and joined the Jama‘at. Karam Din’s complaint against me was dismissed. Many people made offerings and presented gifts out of good will and humility. Thus we returned to Qadian enriched in every way with God’s blessings and God fulfilled the prophecy very clearly. [Haqiqatul-Wahi, p. 252, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, p. 264].
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 585
January 21, 1903
I saw in my dream that Karam Din had been given some sentence and this was followed by the revelation:

662—[Arabic] That was because they disobeyed and used to transgress. [Publishers]

[Notebook of the Revelations of the Promised Messiahas, p. 2]
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 587
January 24, 1903
(A) Today, in a vision, I was shown the following:

663—[Arabic] A detailed account of that which Allah did in this war after I had published the prophecy among people. [Publishers]

Thereafter my mind moved towards the reception of revelation and I was repeating these very words. This indicates that the prophecy made about the case beforehand would now be fulfilled in detail. [al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 1–2, January 23–30, 1903, p. 7 and al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 5, February 20, 1903, p. 36 and al-Hakam, vol. 7, no. 4, January 31, 1903, p. 15]

(B) I saw in my dream as if I was about to publish an article on the final result of Karam Din’s case against me and I wished to give it this heading:

664–[Arabic] The details of that which Allah did in this war after we had published the prophecy among people. They have drawn away from the water of life, then grind them down a fine grinding. [Publishers]

[Notebook of the Revelations of the Promised Messiahas, p. 3]
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 617
June 29, 1903
I was pondering deeply about the result of the cases which have been filed against me by Karam Din and which some members of my Jama‘at [Community] have filed against him. In this condition, I received the revelation:

714—[Arabic] Verily, Allah is with those who are righteous and those who do good. In this there are Signs for questioners. [Publishers]

I was made to understand that of the two sides God will be with those and will bestow help and victory upon those, who are righteous—that is to say, who do not tell lies, do not wrong anyone, do not calumniate anyone, do not persecute people by cheating, deceiving, and dishonest dealing, and eschew every vice and adhere to truth and justice. And fearing God, they treat His servants with sympathy, goodwill and goodness, and are true wellwishers of mankind. They are not inspired by beastliness, wrongdoing and evil, and are ever ready to behave virtuously towards everyone. The final decision will be in their favour. At that time those who ask: ‘which of the two sides is in the right’ will be shown not one Sign but many Signs. [al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 24, July 3, 1903, p. 189 and al-Hakam, vol. 7, no. 24, June 30, 1903, p. 11].

Also found in the ROR (English of July 1903)See page 288
http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1903/reviewreligionsenglish190307.pdf
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 625

August 18, 1903
[al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 32, August 28, 1903, p. 253 and al-Hakam, vol. 7, no. 31, August 24, 1903, p. 6] Translation: (A) [Arabic] [I shall honour you in a goodly way.] (B) [Arabic] I shall honour you
in a way that will cause people to wonder. (C) [Arabic] The heavens and the earth were closed-up like a bundle and We opened them out, that is, the earth as well as the heavens demonstrated their full powers. (D) [Arabic]

Tell them: It is Allah Who has revealed these words; and then leave them occupied with their
sport. (E) That is [Arabic] They will ask you about your status—what is your honour and
status.731 Say: It is God Who has granted me this status; and then leave them indulging in
idle sport. (F) [Arabic] [No incongruity can you see in the creation of the Gracious One.]
[Haqiqatul-Wahi, pp. 90, 107, 70, 265–266, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, pp. 93, 110, 73, 277–278]

On one occasion when I was in Gurdaspur in connection with a criminal case (that had been instituted against me by Karam Din of Jehlam), I received the revelation: [They will ask you
concerning your status.]… Thereafter when we appeared in court, the other side’s lawyer asked me the same question: Is your rank and status as you have described it in Tiryaqul-Qulub? I answered: Yes, by Allah’s grace that is my status; Allah has Himself bestowed it upon me.
In this manner the revelation which had come to me in the morning was fulfilled about the time of ‘Asr. [Haqiqatul-Wahi, pp. 265–266, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, pp. 277–278]
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 631

September 23, 1903
al-Badr reports that the Promised Messiah[as] narrated the following dream upon rising in the morning:

I had taken up a pen to write. I observed that its point was broken. Thereupon I said: Put on to it one of the nibs that had been sent by Muhammad Afdal. While those nibs were being looked for, I woke up….

If someone would take the time out from worldly occupations and stay with me, he would witness a running river of prophecies being fulfilled like the one of yesterday concerning a pen.740[al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 37, October 2, 1903, p. 390].

740— al-Badr reports that:

After 10 a.m. the case brought by Karam Din against the Promised Messiahas and Hakim Fadl Din was brought up. Khwajah Sahib presented a request on behalf of Hakim Fadl Din that the charges made by Maulavi Karam Din are the same for the investigation of which I have brought a case against Karam Din. Therefore the present case should be postponed till the earlier cases are decided. The lawyers on both side entered into a debate on this issue and the court decided to
postpone the decision to the following day. In the evening the Promised Messiahas received the revelation: [Persian] Be glad and happy. On the 24th the case brought by Sheikh Ya‘qub ‘Ali Editor al- Hakam against Maulavi Karam Din and the Editor of Sirajul-Akhbar of Jehlum was to be heard. But since the testimony of the plaintiff was not available, the case was postponed to October 21, 1903. Since the court had not yet rendered a decision of the discussion of the previous day, Khwajah Sahib wanted to bring up additional legal points. After hearing him, the court decided after 1 p.m. that the plea for postponement be turned down. Thus the words of God, which He
conveyed to His apostle on the 22nd in the evening and which he had narrated on the morning of the 23rd were fulfilled. [al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 37, October 2, 1903, p. 390].
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 632

September 23, 1903
741–
[Persian] Be glad and happy. [Publishers]

[al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 37, October 2, 1903, p. 390]

Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: This revelation was received during the court case of Karam Din.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 670-671

May 1904
(A)805—
[Arabic] We made the iron soft for you. [Persian] We do not approve of any other meaning. [Publishers]

[al-Badr, vol. 3, no. 29, August 1, 1904, p. 4 and al-Hakam, vol. 8, no. 17, May 24, 1904, p. 2]

(B) In the case brought against me by Maulavi Karam Din at Gurdaspur, Karam Din insisted that the word la’im meant bastard and that the word kazzab meant one who always tells lies. The court of first instance accepted his contention. In those days I received the revelation:

806—[Persian] We do not approve of any other meaning. [Publishers]

I understood this as indicating that the interpretation of the first court would not be upheld on appeal; and so it happened. The Divisional Judge rejected all the arguments advanced on behalf of Karam Din and held that la’im and kazzab were appropriate for Karam Din, who was
deserving of even stronger words.[Haqiqatul-Wahi, p. 380, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, p. 394].
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 671

May 1904
807—-[Arabic] We shall put awe in their hearts. [Publishers]

[al-Badr, vol. 3, no. 29, August 1, 1904, p. 4 and al-Hakam, vol. 8, no. 16, May 17, 1904, p. 2]

Footnote—Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: This revelation was received on the return from Gurdaspur where the Promised Messiahas had gone in connection with the case of Karam Din. (See al-Hakam, May 24, 1904, p. 2).
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 677-678

1904
A Maulavi named Karam Din filed some criminal charges against me in Gurdaspur and the maulavis opposed to me appeared as witnesses in the court of Atma Ram, the Extra Assistant Commissioner…. Atma Ram did not pay full attention to the merits and made up his mind to sentence me to imprisonment. Thereupon God conveyed to me that Atma Ram would be afflicted with the deaths of his children. I communicated this vision to the members of my
Jama‘at825. It so happened that within 20 or 25 days he lost two sons. In the end, though he had laid the foundation in his judgment of sentencing me to imprisonment, God held him back from that design, yet he imposed upon me a fine of 700 rupees. I was then honourably acquitted on appeal by the Divisional Judge. But Karam Din’s conviction and sentence were maintained. My fine was remitted but Atma Ram’s sons did not come back…. According to the Divine prophecy which had been published already in my book Mawahibur-Rahman, I was acquitted, my fine was refunded, and the issuing officer’s [Atma Ram’s] order was set aside and he was rebuked for issuing an improper order. But Karam Din (as I had already published in Mawahibur- Rahman) was convicted and punished and the judgment of the court confirmed his being a liar. [Haqiqatul-Wahi, pp. 121–122, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, pp. 124–125].

825—Note by Maulana Abdul Latif Bahawalpuri: Qadi Muhammad Yusuf, Amir Jama‘at Ahmadiyyah, Frontier Province writes in his book Sawanih Zuhur-e-Ahmad Ma‘ud:

The Promised Messiahas saw in a dream that a lion has taken away both sons of Atma Ram. At the same time as the Promised Messiahas narrated this dream, Atma Ram received a telegram that his son is suffering from plague. Two sons of his died one after the other with plague. [Zuhur-e-Ahmad Mau‘ud, pp. 51–52].  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 1048

Sheikh Khair-ud-Din 1261 narrated that: When the case of Karam Din was pending before Chandu Lal Magistrate, the Promised Messiahas said: I do not see Chandu Lal1262 occupying the Magistrate’s chair.[al-Hakam, vol, no. 38, no. 25, July 14, 1935, p. 4 and Register Riwayat-e-Sahabah, vol. 9, pp. 58–59]

1261–Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: He was from Ludhiana and was a cobbler by profession. He used to make shoes for the Promised Messiahas. He stated that he stayed with the Promised Messiahas in Gurdaspur during Karam Din’s trial.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 1049

October 7, 1904
Chaudhry Muhammad ‘Ali Khan Ashraf Head Master Bairam Pur narrated that:

The Promised Messiahas said at the time of ‘Asr Prayer one day before judgment was to be delivered in the case of Karam Din… that he had seen in his dream that he was returning home riding a white horse and his wife said (something like): We have suffered a loss (probably of money). The Promised Messiahas said to her: That does not matter as I have returned safe.

The Promised Messiahas interpreted the dream that the Magistrate (who was a bigoted Arya, and was bent upon giving the decision against the Promised Messiah) would sentence him to a fine, but nothing more. However, on appeal he would be acquitted and would thus be made
secure against the mischief of the Magistrate. That is exactly what happened the next day; he was sentenced to a fine, which was immediately paid … and on appeal [he was acquitted and] the fine was remitted.[al-Hakam, vol. 38, no. 3, January 28, 1935, p. 4].
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 1050

October 8, 1904
Shukar Ilahi of Nabi Pur District Gurdaspur narrates that: On the (day) on which judgment in the case of Karam Din was to be announced… the Promised Messiahas was walking… under the trees at the time of ‘Asr.… He stopped suddenly from walking and said something to Maulavi Sahib [Nur-ud-Din]. At that time the case was called and when we returned to the shed, the Promised Messiahas said to Maulavi Sahib [Nur-ud-Din]: I have seen in a vision that
my handkerchief had fallen in a pool of water but was recovered. He interpreted this as meaning that he would be sentenced to a fine which would be remitted. And that is what happened.[Register Riwayat-e-Sahabah, vol. 3, p. 114]
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 1050-1051

October 10, 1904
Miyan Allah Yar Contractor of Batala narrates through Maulavi Ghulam Nabi Misri that:
At the end of the case in Gurdaspur, when the Promised Messiahas was about to leave for Batala for the return journey to Qadian, he received a vision or a revelation:

[Urdu] The route via Batala is dangerous.

The Promised Messiahas asked for the carriages to be brought, and three of them were brought. (He changed his route and commenced the journey.) He explained the reason for the change of route. In the meantime a rath (bullock chariot) had been sent from Qadian to Batala to meet him. Instead of the Promised Messiahas some of his companions including Sheikh Ya‘qub ‘Ali, travelled in it. When they arrived at the canal bridge, they found that some of the opponents from Massanian and Batala were pretending to hold a meeting. They had conspired to waylay the Promised Messiahas at the bridge and throw him into the canal. ….When the chariot approached the bridge it was surrounded by the crowd of opponents… and there was
a skirmish… but when they discovered that the Promised Messiahas was not in the chariot, they apologised for the assault. [Register Riwayat-e-Sahabah, vol. 10, pp. 280–281].
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Hidden Treasures–https://www.alislam.org/library/book/hidden-treasures-of-islam/

Pages 343–346
Summary written by Syed Hasanat Ahmad (2010)

The publication of the book had an instant impact. It published a prophecy of the Promised Messiahas about Maulavi Karam Din. The book was published on January 15, 1903, by special efforts of the press workers in Qadian and carried the news that Maulavi Karam Din would attempt to involve the Promised Messiahas in criminal cases and the Promised Messiahas was divinely informed that he would be honourably acquitted from these cases. The publication had to be completed before that date as Maulavi Karam Din had already moved the Extra Assistant Commissioner of Jhelum to issue warrant of arrest of the Promised Messiahas under Section 500, 501 and 502 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the date of hearing was fixed on January 17, 1903. The issuance of warrant of arrest provided yet another occasion to opponents to raise an uproar against the Promised Messiahas and they were clamouring a severe punishment for him. The trip from Qadian to Jhelum became historic in several ways. Giving details of the journey in a later publication (Haqiqatul-Wahi), the

Promised Messiahas said:

When I was on my way to Jhelum in connection with a case filed by Maulavi Karam Din, I had a revelation: “I (God) will shower blessings upon you from all directions.” I related the revelation to the people of my Jama‘at and this revelation came true in this manner that, when I reached Jhelum, about ten thousand people came to see me and most of them had lined up on the roads. Such a crowd had assembled in the court that it had amazed the authorities. About
eleven hundred people came to me for bai‘at and about two hundred of them were women. The case filed by Maulavi Karam Din was dismissed and a large number of people made offerings in cash and kinds to show their regard and respect for me. And this was how I was showered with the Divine blessings and returned to Qadian victoriously. (Haqiqatul-Wahi, p. 252, Sign No. 101, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, pp. 263-264).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Hidden Treasures--https://www.alislam.org/library/book/hidden-treasures-of-islam/

Page 126
Summary written by Syed Hasanat Ahmad (2010)

Padre ‘Imad-ud-Din, a native convert from Islam, was a paid servant of the Christians for a long time. He had already made himself notorious by his rabid and scurrilous attacks upon the Holy Founder of Islam. His books Tarikh-e-Muhammadi and Hidayatul-Muslimin had inflicted deep wounds upon religious susceptibilities of the Muslims. Even the Ra’i Hind and Prakash of Amritsar had protested against his bitter attacks. Another Hindu paper, Aftab-e- Punjab had
also condemned his writings. Muslims exposed this paid preacher of Christians in a book entitled ‘Uqubatud Dallin. Even the organ of the American Mission, Shamsul Akhbar of Lucknow had admitted the abusive nature of Padre ‘Imad-ud-Din and his colleagues Maulavi
Karam Din, Nizamud Din, Ilahi Bakhsh, Hamidullah Khan, etc., who were called Maulavis and learned men to deceive the public. The Promised Messiahas offered five thousand rupees as a reward if they could jointly produce a book like the one entitled Nurul-Haqq (Life of
Ahmad by A.R. Dardra, edition of 2008, pp. 412-413).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Life of Ahmad by A.R. Dardra, edition of 2008, page 564.
Footnote 135

Ahmadas had felt the need of a press at Qadian as early as 1892. An Ishtihar was issued and a fund was opened for this purpose; but, it appears satisfactory arrangements could not be made at that time. Sh. Nur Ahmadra brought his press, Riyad-e-Hind, from Amritsar and A’ina Kamalat-e-Islam was then printed at Qadian. After that Hakim Fadal Dinra started a press at
Qadian in 1895. It was named Diya’ul Islam. This press produced Ahmad’sas publications at cost price (Ahmad’sas statement in Karam Din’s case, Section 420. I.P.C. dated. 19.8.1903). It was for this reason that Ahmadas produced, on 15.8.1898 a detailed account of this press in the income tax case. (See statement of Hakim Fadl Din in Karam Din’s case on 20.7.1903).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Nubuwwat & Khilafat
(Prophethood & its Successorship), Four Speeches Delivered on June 10, 1966 Under the Chairmanship of Hadrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih III (may Allah shower His mercy upon him) at Masjid Mubarak Rabwah, Pakistan.—-https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Nubuwwat-and-Khilafat.pdf

Pages 17-18

Statements Under Oath of Maulavi Muhammad ‘Ali in the Court

14) a. In the presence of Promised Messiahas, Maulavi Muhammad ‘Ali appeared as a witness on May 13, 1904. On being questioned by Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din he said:

Anyone who denies the truthfulness of a Prophet is a great liar. Mirza Sahib has claimed to be a Nabi. His followers believe him to be true in this claim and his opponents consider him false. The Holy Prophetsa is true according to Muslims and false according to the Christians.

b. On June 16, 1904, in the presence of the Promised Messiahas, in response to the critique made by Maulavi Karam Din, Maulavi Muhammad ‘Ali said:

Mirza Sahib makes a claim of nubuwwat in his writings. The purport of his claim is that, “I am a Nabi but I have brought no new shari‘ah.” According to the Holy Qur’an anyone who treats such a true claimant as a liar is a great liar. (Court Proceedings, p. 362).

16) In the case of Maulavi Karam Din of Bhaiñ [District Jehlum], acting as attorneys, Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din and Maulavi Muhammad ‘Ali, submitted the following statement under the signature of the Promised Messiahas:

There is another view of the matter according to Mohamedan theology. One who belies a person claiming to be a Prophet is a kadhdhab [great liar] and this has been admitted by prosecution evidence. Now the complainant knew perfectly well that the first accused claimed that position and, notwithstanding that, he belied the accused. Consequently in religious terminology the complainant was a kadhdhab. (Proceedings Gurdaspur Court, p. 194).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Hidden Treasureshttps://www.alislam.org/library/book/hidden-treasures-of-islam/

Page 314-315
Summary written by Syed Hasanat Ahmad (2010)

Explaining the use of relevant quotes from other authorities, the Promised Messiahas stated that these quotes do not constitute plagiarism, otherwise everyone will be exposed to this charge. It so happened that Mian Shahabuddin and Maulavi Karam Din in their correspondence with the Promised Messiahas mentioned that most of the material appearing in Saif-e-Chishtiya’i written by Pir Mehar ‘Ali Shah is copied word by word from the notes of Maulavi Muhammad Hasan Faidi and these notes were written by him on the margins of the books I‘jazul-Masih and Shamse Bazighah and these books carrying marginal notes were bought. This is how the devious Pir was exposed who made the allegations that the Promised Messiahas had plagiarized whereas the same charge recoiled on him.

The Promised Messiahas also replied to criticism that Pir Mehar ‘Ali Shah made in his book, Saif-e-Chishtiya’i about the merit of the I‘jazul-Masih. The Promised Messiahas also established that the revelation made to him were revelation of high order. The Pir also made an allegation that the Promised Messiahas had been plagiarizing from Maqamat-e-Hariri but what actually transpired was that Pir Mehar ‘Ali Shah had himself plagiarized from the notes of Maulavi
Muhammad Hasan Faidi which the Maulavi had written marginally on the I‘jazul-Masih and Shamse Bazighah by Hadrat Maulavi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi. This information was given by Mian Shahabuddin and Maulavi Karam Din in their letters to the Promised Messiahas. This whole correspondence has also been published in this book.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Lecture Ludhiana, pages 31-32

“””Then another case was filed against me in the court of Mr. Dowie, and was followed by yet another concerning income tax. By the grace of God, my innocence was established in all of them. Then came Karam Din’s case in which every effort was made against me and it was
assumed that the case would sound the death knell of this Jama‘at. Indeed, had the Jama‘at not been from God and had He not sustained and strengthened it, it would no doubt have been wiped out. People from one end of the country to the other lent their support to Karam Din. He
was aided and abetted in every way, so much so that some of the prosecution witnesses, despite their claim to beingreligious divines, testified to what was totally false. They went to the extent of alleging that despite being an adulterer, a transgressor and a libertine, I dared claim to be righteous. The case dragged on for a long time. During this period a number of heavenly signs appeared. At long last, the judgement was announced by the magistrate, who happened to be a Hindu, imposing a fine of five hundred rupees on me. But God had already informed me:

“The Superior Court acquits.”

Therefore, when the appeal was filed in the court of the Divisional Judge, he, in his God-given shrewdness, at once got to the bottom of the case and noted in the judgement that whatever I had written about Karam Din was absolutely correct and I had full right to do so. The judgement he passed has since been published. In the end, he acquitted me of the charge and ordered the refund of the fine. He also censured the trial court for letting the case linger so long.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s poetry vs. Karam Din
See Durr-e-Sameen.  https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Durr-e-Sameen-English-Translation.pdf.  Pages 86 and 94

Page 86
Is it not strange that while you are His beloved,
The entire affairs are being carried out to my favour?
Then not only this that it has happened once, I see the bounties of God at each step.
Look at that man from Bheen whose named Karam Din,
Who even sacrificed his sleep for the sake of conflict,
For whose help there was fervour among the people and
Whose weaknesses were hidden by every enemy of truth,
Whose friend was every aggressor and strayed person,
For whose help came the Muslim clerics, (210)

Page 94
What a strange thingHe helps a disbeliever
That God Who was supposed to befriend the believers.
In your eyes, even Karam Din was one of the pious ones
Who aggressively attacked mefor no reason.
I was not without supportGod’s help was with me
God’s revelation repeatedly gave glad tiding of victory.
But he did not see mehis eyes were closed
Then, after retribution, he decked himself with eye salve.
In the offices123, his name still remains as a liar
Now he can’t erase this name until the Day of Counting. (130)
____________________________________________________________________________________________
From the Review of Religions–Jan 1903, (english version)

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR190301.pdf#page=39

MGA gives lots of revelations claiming that his enemies will be defeated.  MGA also claimed to have seen Gabriel for the first time ever.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
From the Review of Religions–Jan 1905, (english version)

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR190501.pdf#page=39

End of Cases vs. MGA

see pages 39-40

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad lost his court case vs. Karam din 1904, but won on appeal

Intro
17 August 1903: The Promised Messiahas embarked on his journey towards Gurdaspur, after saying Zuhr and Asr prayers in congregation. The purpose behind this was to attend the hearing of a lawsuit filed by Karam Din. Hazrat Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmadra was also part of the entourage. Hazrat Ahmadas made a night-stay in Batala in an inn situated near the railway station. Dusk and night prayers were offered there in congregation.

20 August 1903: The Promised Messiahas arrived back in Qadian from Gurdaspur from the aforementioned journey.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad only lost one court case in his entire life. This was the case of 1903–1905.  It was in terms of defamation. In 1899, MGA was ordered to never call anyone Kazzab or Kafir ever again.  Well, it seems that MGA was accused of exactly that in 1903 by Karam–ud-Din.  Further, this was the first case wherein the judge was not a European, the judge was Hindu, and he even refused to give MGA a chair to sit on (see Mahmud Ahmad, “Hazrat Ahmad”, 1998 edition, online, see pages 46-51).  In fact, in 1904, MGA was found guilty and was supposed to be taken into custody, however, his bail was paid and MGA was released.  MGA’s legal team then fought the case on appeal, wherein the case went before a European judge, who promptly vindicated MGA (see RoR, pages 39-40, Jan-1905 edition, online).

Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/08/17/khwaja-kamal-ud-din-prevents-hazrat-mirza-sahib-from-being-jailed-1904/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/12/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-maulvi-karam-din-court-case-1903-1905-references-from-the-2009-edition-of-tadhkirah-and-some-other-sources/

Muhammad Ali’s testimony
Interestingly enough, Muhammad Ali was called to the stand to testify about MGA and his book, Tiryaq ul Qulub, Muhammad Ali and MGA said on oath that MGA’s beliefs hadnt changed since the writing of TQ.  Which was an obvious lie, since we all know he claimed prophethood in 1901….and thus his entire claim changed.

The reference from Haqiqatul way wherein MGA mentions this case
“Sign no. 118.  I was staying in Gurdaspur in connection with a criminal case (brought against me by Karam Din of Jhelum).  I received a revelation: “You will be questioned about your rank and dignity.  Say.  Allah has bestowed this rank on me; and leave them in their sport”.  I related this revelation to my companions who were not less than forty in number including Maulvi Muhammad Ali and Khwaja Kamalu-ud-Din.  Later, we went into the court where the counsel for the complainant asked the same question.  “is your rank and dignity the same as has been written in Tiryaq-ul-Qulub?  I replied: “Yes; it is so by the grace of Allah”.  (Haqiqat al-Wahy, pp. 265-266).  (also see Muhammad Ali, “Heresy in Islam”, online 1995 english edition).

Lecture Ludhiana also mentions the Karam Din Case
See pages 31-32

SOME INTERESTING REFERENCES
http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Tadhkirah.pdf.

629/970

In my dream I said to Maulvi Muhammad Ali (Urdu): You were also righteous and meant well, come and sit down with us (Badr Vol. III, No. 29, Aug. 1, 1904, p. 4).

624-625/970

(a) Revelation (Arabic): We have softened for you, the iron (Persian): We do not approve of any other meaning (AlHakam, Vol. VIII, No. 17, May 24, 1904, p. 2).

“””(b) In the case brought against me by Karam Din at Gurdaspur, Karam Din insisted that the word laeen meant bastard and that the word kazzab meant one who always tells lies. The court of first instance accepted his contention. In those days I received the revelation (Persian): We do not approve of the other meaning; which I understood as indicating that the interpretation of the first court would not be upheld on appeal; and so it happened. The Divisional Judge rejected all the arguments advanced on behalf of Karam Din and held that laeen and kazzab were appropriate for Karam Din, who was deserving of even worse.”” (Haqeegat-ul-Wahi p. 380).

630-631/970

“”In Karam Din’s case against me Atma Ram, Magistrate, did not pay full attention to the merits and made up his mind to sentence me to imprisonment. Thereupon God conveyed to me that
Atma Ram would be afflicted with the deaths of his children. I communicated this vision to the members of my Movement and it so happened that within 20 or 25 days he lost two sons. In the end, though he had laid the foundation in his judgment of sentencing me to imprisonment, God held him back from that design, yet he imposed upon me a fine of 700 rupees. I was then honorably acquitted on appeal by the Divisional Judge. But Karam Din’s conviction and sentence were maintained. My fine was remitted but Atma Ram’s sons did not come back. According to the Divine prophecy which had been published already in my book Mawahibur Rahman, I was acquitted, my fine was refunded, Atma Ram’s order was set aside and the Appellate Court rebuked him for an improper order, but Karam Din was convicted and punished and the judgment of the court confirmed his being a liar”” (Haqeeqatul-Wahi pp. 121-122).

Zafrullah Khan’s comments

This is from Zafrullah Khan’s book about his mother

26/117

http://www.alislam.org/library/books/MyMother.pdf

“””Some time thereafter he(HIS FATHER) was summoned to appear as a defence witness in the court of a Magistrate at Gudaspur in a criminal case in which Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Founder of the Ahmadiyyah Movement, was being tried for defamation of one Maulvi
Karam Deen, one of his bitter and virulent opponents. This afforded him an opportunity of meeting the illustrious personage and he was much impressed with his gracious personality and his very high spirituality. He was now studying the Movement earnestly, had become a regular subscriber to the weekly Al-Hakam and started attending the daily lesson of the Holy Quran given by Maulvi Abdul Karim, an eminent disciple and devoted companion of the Promised Messiah. He had at no time been opposed to the Movement, but he possessed a deliberate temperament and made up his mind after careful and deep reflection.””

Mirza Masroor Ahmad mentions how the sons of this hindu magistrate died
Friday Sermon, February 6th, 2015 (https://www.alislam.org/friday-sermon/2015-02-06.html)
The Khalifa give no references.


Links and related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Lekh+Ram

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/dr-henry-martyn-clarkes-legal-statement-vs-mga-in-the-court-of-the-district-of-gurdaspur/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/who-is-abdul-hameed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/dr-clarkes-initial-comments-on-mga-sending-abdul-hameed-to-murder-him/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/a-e-martineau-district-magistrate-amritsar-his-arrest-warrant-vs-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/captain-m-w-douglas-district-magistrate-district-gurdaspur/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/who-is-maulvi-burhanuddin-of-jhelum-1830-1905/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/the-statement-of-dr-clarke-on-solemn-affirmation-on-12th-august-1897-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Lekh

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Athim

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/08/even-in-1907-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-still-lusting-for-his-niece-muhammadi-begum/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-sent-abdul-hameed-to-murder-dr-clark-after-lekh-ram-was-murdered/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/The-Afghan-Martyrs-by-B.A.Rafiq.pdf

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Maulvi Sanaullah vs. Maulana Ghulam Rasul Sahib [Rajeki], Debate in Kartarpur in 1918

Intro
Maulvi Sanaullah had many debates with Ahmadi’s in British-India.  One such debate was held in Kartarpur, British India in 1918.  Maulana Ghulam Rasul Sahib [Rajeki] represented the Ahmadi side.

The data from Ahmadiyya sources, Taken from Al Fazl, 4 June 1918

Maulvi Sanaullah [Amritsari] took advantage of the fact that we did not obtain the books of the Promised Messiahas on the first day of the debate, and in doing so attributed a false doctrine to the Promised Messiahas. For this reason, we regretted not having the books of the Promised Messiahas and today, we have ordered many books and files containing newspapers of the Promised Messiahas from Kapurthala, which is 6-7 miles away from Kartarpur. Jamaat Kapurthala did a remarkable job in getting the literature to us.

Nonetheless, Maulvi Sanaullah Sahib did not even address those accusations and arguments, as he knew that we now had the books of the Promised Messiahas to answer from, thus able to reveal his evil plots. Otherwise, we had prepared many references that would have nullified the accusations of Maulvi Sanaullah Sahib. We could have, thus, proven that the victory of Islam is destined at the hand of the Promised Messiahas, however this Amritsari Maulvi steared clear of those subjects.

First session

The convention commenced at 9 o’clock, and instead of Maulvi Sanaullah, Maulvi Nawabuddin approached the podium. Maulana Ghulam Rasul Sahib [Rajeki] represented us. The first session of the debate lasted three hours long.

Ahmadiyya arguments

As the Ahmadiyya representative, Maulana Ghulam Rasul Sahib proved the truthfulness of the Promised Messiahas through verses of the Holy Quran …

Further, he proved Huzoor’sas victory through Huzoor’sas very own revelations.

Maulvi Nawabuddin’s response

How could Maulvi Sahib answer Quranic arguments? So instead, he stood up and began reading from Maulvi Sanaullah’s journals Aqaid-e-Mirza and Chistan-e-Mirza, from beginning to end, thereby consuming his allotted time reading these journals aloud.

Readers will be aware that a written response to Chistan-e-Mirza was published quite some time agoand Aqaid-e-Mirza is a recent publication which is based on nothing but fabrications. I do not feel the need to document each and every argument raised therein, as our readers are well-acquainted with most of them. Some, however, I shall present below …

Maulvi Sanaullah alleged: “I have a following of 150,000. 1,400 of them possess bachelor’s degrees, while 1,500 to 1,600 have master’s degrees. They are all my servants. I am a Godly saint and even if a person who sweeps my shoes rises up, no Ahmadi bears the strength to overpower them.”

The Ahmadi response: Maulvi Ghulam Rasul Sahib stated that to make such fabricated bold claims could not prove the truthfulness of anybody. “If you are indeed truthful, then surely you should be able to tell us where those people are who possess bachelor’s degrees. Otherwise, of course we will consider you a liar. And as far as your claim is concerned, that a person who sweeps your shoes is no match for any Ahmadi in argumentation, then we will have to see…”

Allegation: “Mirza Sahib[as] said that he was appointed as a prophet at the end of 1300 AH, but then in another place he states that he was appointed as a prophet in 1290 AH. Here, there is a difference of ten years. In another place he states that he was bestowed the honour of Divine discourse in 1275 AH, thereby creating a difference of 25 years. This is something that our minds cannot fathom.”

The Ahmadi response: “Maulvi Sahib, what a wonderful example of a discrepancy you have picked! But will you be so quick to reject the Quran on the basis of such a discrepancy. God states,

وَ اِ ذْ وٰعَدْنَا مُوْسيٰ اَرْبَعِيْنَ لَيْلَةً

[And remember the time when We made Moses a promise of forty nights. (Surah Al-Baqarah, Ch.2: V.52)]

whereas in another place, He states,

وَوَاعَدْنَا مُوْسيٰ ثَلَاثِيْنَ لَيْلَةً

[And We made Moses a promise of thirty nights (Surah Al-A‘raf, Ch.7: V.143)]

“Here, there is a difference of 10 days. Now, will you discard the Quran?

“The fact is that the difference is not of 25 years. In one place the Promised Messiahas refers to his prophethood, whereas in the other, he refers to the time when he began sharing words with his Lord. The year he was given prophethood was 1300 AH and he began receiving Divine revelations 25 years prior. Hence, there is no discrepancy.”

Allegation: “Mirza Sahib[as] writes that he saw God flicking ink from a pen and the drops of ink from the pen fell on Mirza Sahib[as].”

The Ahmadi response: “The Holy Prophetsa also saw God, and that too in the embodiment of a young man whose hair fell to his neck. This tradition is narrated in Sahih Al-Bukhari. If anyone should have any objection in seeing the Almighty, then it should first be raised against the Holy Prophetsa. As far as the red ink is concerned, that actually happened and the red ink did fall on him. There can be no denying it. Yes, you may obtain its proof from us, should you wish.”

Allegation: “Mirza Sahib[as] claims that he saw God personified as well as in visions and dreams.”

The Ahmadi response: “Perhaps Maulvi Sahib deems personification and visions to be two opposing phenomena. The fact is, Maulvi Sahib, that personifications occur in visions, and by not knowing this, the allegation occurred to you. Perhaps you would do better if you thought before you spoke.” …

The first session came to a close and the crowds discussed Maulvi Sahib’s embarrassing ignorance among themselves, so much so that when they reached home, the chairman of the congregation said, “Today, had anyone asked me the outcome [of the debate] I would have said that Maulvi Nawabuddin Sahib lost.” Upon this, Maulvi Nawabuddin replied, “Well, that does not make me a disbeliever!”

Second session 

Before the debate commenced, participants of the event were told that if they could prove that Jesusas was raised to the heavens in bodily form, then the organisers would reject the claim of Hazrat Mirza Sahibas as the Promised Messiah and would accept that the same Jesusas was due to appear. However, if the Ahmadis were able to prove that Jesusas had passed away, then it would be accepted that Hazrat Mirza Sahib’sas claim was truthful.

Maulvi Sanaullah’s answer

Maulvi Sanaullah said to Miyan Muhammad Ismail Sahib Ahmadi, “If you wish to understand the reality about the ‘Death of Jesus’, then come with me and I shall explain this matter in private. This debate is unnecessary.”

Upon this, the response from our [the Ahmadiyya] side was, “Whatever you wish to explain in private, explain it here in front of everybody so that everyone can benefit from it. We will give you the proof of his death so that the issue is settled once and for all.” Maulvi [Sanaullah] Sahib evaded the opportunity with excuses.

Proof of Jesus’as death

At that moment, Hazrat Maulana Ghulam Rasul Sahib presented a lecture on the truthfulness of the Promised Messiahas and briefly expounded on the death of Jesusas in such a great manner that Maulvi Sanaullah Sahib was not given an opportunity to even whimper. Maulvi Sahib paid no attention to those arguments, even though he was directly questioned on them and was summoned to present a response. However, Maulvi Sahib avoided coming to those points.

Maulvi Sanaullah’s speech

As opposed to using the Quran, Maulvi Sanaullah Sahib succumbed to the prophecy pertaining to the nikah [marriage] with Muhammadi Begum instead. (As readers are aware of the sort of allegations Maulvi Sanaullah raises at this prophecy, it would be unfitting, and a means of prolonging this report, to mention each and every allegation. However, we shall present the core arguments.)

Maulvi Ghulam Rasul Sahib established the argument through the Quran that God reserves the right to abrogate or alter His signs, as He stated:

وَاِذَابَدَّلْنَا آيَةٍ مَّكَانَ آيَةٍ

[And when We bring one sign in place of another … (Surah Al-Nahl, Ch.16: V.102)]

and,

مَا نَنْسَخْ مِنْ آيَةٍ

[Whatever Sign We abrogate … (Surah Al-Baqarah, Ch.2: V.107)]

and … the life of anything is in the Hand of God. As He states Himself,

يَمْحُوا اللہُ مَا يَشَاءُ وَ يُثْبِتُ

[Allah effaces what He wills, and establishes what He wills. (Sural Al-Ra‘d, Ch.13: V.40)]

Thus, if any abrogation or alteration is witnessed in a sign of God, then no objection can be raised against the truthfulness of the one who received the revelation. A prophecy containing a warning is more suitable to be altered or abrogated, as was the prophecy vouchsafed to Jonahas concerning a punishment that would appear within forty days on his nation. That punishment was avoided as a result of their repentance and it is God’s promise,

وَمَا كَانَ اللہُ مُعَذِّبَهُمْ وَهُمْ يَسْتَغْفِرُوْنَ

[And Allah would not punish them while they sought forgiveness (Surah Al-Anfal, Ch.8 : V.34)]

Thus, according to the prophecy of Ahmad Baig’s demise, his son-in-law and the rest of his family witnessed the truth of the prophecy, which ultimately made them fearful and led them to repent and seek forgiveness from God. They wrote letters to the Promised Messiahas and that is why he [Ahmad Baig’s son-in-law] avoided death and Muhammadi Begum’s nikah was also abrogated.

In response, Sanaullah cited the verse,

وَعْدَ اللہِ ۖ لَا يُخْلِفُ اللہُ وَعْدَهُ وَلَـٰكِنَّ أَ كْثَرَ النَّاسِ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ

[Allah has made this promise. Allah breaks not His promise, but most men know not. (Surah Al-Rum, Ch.30: V.7)]

showing his resolute belief that God never alters His promise. This is the summary of Maulvi Sahib’s argument. Readers can decide for themselves what the outcome was.

Wassalam

Umaruddin Ahmadi

City of Jalandhar 

(Al Fazl, 4 June 191

Links and Related Essays

100 Years Ago… – Report of the Debate in Kartarpur

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/10/02/who-is-maulana-sanaullah-amritsari-1868-1948/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/05/30/who-is-maulvi-saadullah-or-saadullah-or-sadullah-of-ludhiana-died-jan-1907/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

Tafser Sanai BY:Moulana Sanaullah Amratsari تفسیر ثنائی از مولانا ثناء اللہ امرتسری

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/14/who-is-syed-muhammad-hussain-batalvi-1840-1920/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/maulvi-sanuallah-acknowledges-that-mga-claimed-prophethood-in-nov-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/17/maulvi-sanaullah-visited-qadian/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/09/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-4159-4160-in-the-ahmadiyya-qurans-before-the-death-of-jesus-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/out-of-fear-from-ahmadis-and-mgas-fake-prophecies-batalvi-registered-to-buy-a-gun-1898-1899-but-was-denied/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Ijaz-e-Ahmadi.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/02/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-disparaging-comments-on-abu-hurairah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/14/the-final-decision-with-mawlana-sanaullah-amritsari-by-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1907/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/20/a-muslim-is-one-who-accepts-all-those-appointed-by-god-by-mirza-bashir-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-april-1911/

Maulana Sanaullah of Amritsar

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Cholera

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/10/ilhamat-e-mirza-in-english-as-the-revelations-of-mirza-by-sanaullah-amritsari/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-sanaullah/

Tags

#AHMADIYYA #AHMADIYYATRUEISLAM #AHMADIAPARTHEID #AHMADIYYAT #RABWAH #QADIAN #MEETTHEKHALIFA #MUSLIMSFORPEACE #AHMADIYYAFACTCHECKBLOG #NOLIFEWITHOUTKHALIFA #AHMADIYYAPERSECUTION #TRUEISLAM

  1.  “MARKAZI JAMIAT AHLE HADEES HIND”ARCHIVED FROM THE ORIGINAL ON 2017-10-12.
  2. ^ “Biography of Shaykh Al-Islam Thanaullah Amritsari”
  3. ^ “SANAULLAH AMRITSARI – WIKI”WIKI.QERN.ORGARCHIVED FROM THE ORIGINAL ON 2016-10-02.
  4. ^ “TAFSEER SANAI (BY MOLANA SANA ULLAH AMRITSARY) — AUSTRALIAN ISLAMIC LIBRARY”AUSTRALIAN ISLAMIC LIBRARYARCHIVED FROM THE ORIGINAL ON 2016-09-30.
  5. ^ FAZ̤LURRAḤMĀN BIN MUḤAMMAD. (11 FEBRUARY 1988). “HAZRAT MAULANA SANAULLAH AMRITSARI”ARCHIVED FROM THE ORIGINAL ON 11 FEBRUARY 2018 – VIA HATHI TRUST.
  6. ^ QURESHI, AQEEL (25 APRIL 2016). “SEERAT SANAI(HAZRAT MOLANA SANAULLAH AMRITSARI RA) ~ SIQARAH PUBLIC LIBRARY ISLAM PORA JABBER”ARCHIVED FROM THE ORIGINAL ON 19 OCTOBER 2016.

Who is Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari (1868–1948)?

Intro
Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari was an Ahl-e-Hadith (Wahabi) Muslim from British India, he was born into a family of Kashmiri descent.  He was born on June 12, 1868 and died on March 15, 1948 in Sarghoda, Pakistan.  He was a major opponent of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the early Ahmadiyya movement. Sanaullah Amritsari served as the general secretary of Markazi Jamiat Ahle Hadith Hind form 1906 to 1947.  He was also the editor of the “”Ahle Hadees”” magazine.  He moved to Pakistan at the Partition, losing his son in the process, and himself dying in SargodhaPunjab, Pakistan, in 1948, after suffering from a stroke.  Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi was also an Ahl-e-Hadith scholar who beefed with MGA uptil about 1902, Sanaullah seems to have stepped up for the Ahl-e-Hadith of India as they battled vs. Ahmadiyya.  In 1907, he refused to enter into a Mubahila challenge vs. MGA, instead, MGA prayed that if he was a false prophet, he would die in the lifetime of Sanaullah.  He had many debates and arguments with various Ahmadi leaders, he eventually wrote many books, the most famous book in terms of his battles with Ahmadiyya is Ilhamat-e-Mirza (1928)– a critical account of the ‘revelations’ of Mirza.  He was also the main editor and owner of a monthly magazine called, “Muraqqa-Qadiani” which lasted from 1907 until MGA died in May of 1908.
Its articles were compiled in the shape of book titled “Muraqqa Qadiani” published in 1917.

1890
MGa writes in Izala Auham that a Muslim cannot have a Mubahila with another Muslim.  He contradicts himself a few months later.

1897
MGA mentions Maulvi Sanaullah by name in the Appendix of Anjam e Athim.

1899
MGA is ordered by the British Government to never do a Mubahila challenge ever again.

1902
He published his famous commentary of the Quran called Tafseer Sanai.  MGA quoted this book in 1902, as MGA called Abu Hurairah as stupid, since this commentary quotes a hadith from Sahih Bukhari wherein Abu Hurairah proved that 4:159 meant that Esa (As) hadn’t died yet.  He gets into a debate vs. some Ahmadi’s.  MGA mentions all of this in his book, Ijaz i Ahmadi.  This debate was to be held on October 29, 30, 1902. Syed Muhammad Sarwar Shah and Maulavi Abdullah Kashmiri were to represent the Ahmadis at the debate, and Maulavi Sanaullah the other party. The debate was held in the open under a banyan tree. There were only three Ahmadis at the debate and over 600 non-Ahmadis were present. Maulavi Sanaullah
Amritsari fanned the feelings of the villagers by asserting that the Ahmadis were afraid of debates.  When the terms were being settled Maulavi Sanaullah insisted that nobody should speak for more than 20 minutes despite the protest by Syed Sarwar Shah that the time fixed (20 minutes) was woefully inadequate.

1903—January
Maulvi Sanullah visits Qadian.  He writes:

‘Bismillah Al-Rehman Al-Raheem. To Janab Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Saheb, Raees-e-Qadian.
This humble self, according to your invitation mentioned in Aijaz-e-Ahmadi pp. 11-13, I am presently here in Qadian. Until now, Ramadhan prevented me from accepting your invitation, otherwise I would not have delayed it. I swear upon God that I do not have any personal grievance or animosity against you. Since according to you, you are appointed on such a high position which is for the guidance of all humanity in general and for sincere persons like me especially, therefore I firmly hope that you will not spare any effort to make me understand, and as promised, you will give me permission that I will express in front of people my thoughts about your prophecies. Once again I remind you of my sincerity and the trouble that I have taken to travel all the way, and by virtue of the grand position, please give me a chance.’ …. from Abu al-Wafa Sanaullah. dated 10th January 1903.’ (Tareekh-e-Mirza by Maulana Sanaullah Amratsari p. 61).

Mirza was stunned. He never thought in his wildest dreams that Molvi Sanaullah Saheb would ever come to Qadian. He replied, trying to avoid facing him. He wrote:

“””I have promised God that I would never debate with those people (opponents). Thus that way which is quite far away from debates is that to clear this stage you will have to promise that you will not go out of the ‘Minhaj-e-Nabuwwat – way of the prophethood’ ……. 2nd condition is that you will not be allowed to speak at all. You will only give a written objection, one line or two lines, that this is your objection. Then in the gathering, a detailed reply would be given. For objection, there is no need to write in detail, just a line or two is enough. 3rd condition is that you would raise only ONE objection per day. Since you have not informed us of your coming, rather you have sneaked in like a thief, because of lack of free time and work of printing the book, we cannot spend more than three hours. Remember that this will never be allowed that you give a long lecture like a sermon in front of public, instead you will have to absolutely keep your mouth shut, as deaf and dumb, so that the talk does not turn into a debate. First you will ask only regarding one prophecy. For three hours I can give its reply, and at each you will be cautioned that even if now you are not satisfied then write it down. It would not be your task to let (people) hear your objection. We will read ourselves, but it should not be more than two or three lines. This way, you will not suffer, since you have come to clear your doubts, this way is excellent to remove doubts. I will announce to the people that regarding this prophecy, such and such doubt has come into the heart of Molvi Saheb, and this is its reply. This way all the doubts will be cleared. But if you want that like a debate you are allowed to talk, then this will never happen. (Mirza repeated the same conditions at least two more times in the next paragraph) …. From my side, I swear upon God, that I would not go out of this, and will not hear anything, you will not dare to utter a single word from your mouth. And I bind you also with the swear of God, that if you have come with a true heart, then be bound to it and do not spend your life in creating trouble and disturbance. And whosoever among the two of us, breaks this oath, then God’s curse be on him, and may God will that he sees the fruit of this curse in his life. Ameen….. by the pen of Mirza  Ghulam Ahmad by his own hand”””” (Tareekh-e-Mirza pp.62-64). 

One would have thought that Molvi Sanaullah would have given up after reading such absurd conditions where he is not even allowed to say a single word. But Allah had given him long patience. He wrote back to Mirza Saheb:

“”””I received your long letter. Alas! what is the expectations of the whole country, same thing has happened. Respected Sir! When I have come according to your invitation mentioned in Aijaz-e-Ahmadi, and in clear words I have given reference of the same pages, then such long talk from you …. me dear Sir, it is so sad that on the one hand you invite me to come to do research, that I prove your prophecies wrong to get the cash reward Rs. 100 for each, and then in your letter you are binding me to write just one or two lines whereas for your self you propose to have three hours!!!

Is this the way of research that I write one or two lines and you make a speech for three hours? This shows clearly that you are now regretting having invited me, and is denying your own invitation, and refraining from research, for which you had invited me on page 23. Dear Sir! Did you invite me to your house write these two lines only? I could have done better sitting in Amratsir, and am doing it already. But remembering the troubles of my journey, I do not want to go empty handed, therefore I accept your injustice as well and will write only two three lines, and you can no doubt speak for three hours. However I would request this much alteration that I would read my two three lines to the audience, and after every hour of your speech, I would express my thoughts about your speech for 5 minutes, maximum 10 minutes. Since you do not like public audience, therefore the gathering from sides would be limited to 25 persons. You akin my coming without informing you to be like a thief! Is this how you greet your guests? There was no condition that you have to be informed in advance. Moreover, you would have received the news from heavens. Whatever speech you are going to make, kindly give it to me then, and proceedings will start from today. After I receive your reply, I will send you my brief question. As far as the talk about cursing is concern, it is the same which is mentioned in hadith…. from Sanaullah dated 11th January 1903″””” (Tareekh-e-Mirza p.65) (Hadith about Curse: If the person who has been cursed, does not deserve the curse, then it returns to the one who has cursed).

Mirza Ghulam A Qadiani did not reply to this letter, instead instructed his disciple Mohammed Ahsan Amrohi to write the reply:

“”””Molvi Sanaullah Saheb, your letter was read to Hazrat-e-Aqdas, Imam-uz-Zaman, Maseeh Mowood … since its contents were purely racist and hateful, which is far away from seeking the truth, therefore this reply is enough from Hazrat-e-Aqdas (Mirza) that you do not want to investigate the truth … Hazrat has sworn that he would not enter into any debate with his opponents, how can an appointee of Allah go against his promise of God?… therefore your proposals are absolutely not acceptable…. From Mohammed Ahsan by order of Hazrat Imam-uz-Zaman dated 11th January 1903″””” (Tareekh-e-Mirza p.66).

1903-1904
MGA claims that Maulvi Thana’ullah was present at the famous Karam Din case (see Haqiqatul Wahy, online english edition).

1907–March
Maulvi Sanaullah seems to have been challenging Ahmadi’s to a debate,
Ahmadi.answers.com quotes the AhleHadees newspaper as saying:

“”””Mirza’is! If you are truthful then come; and bring your people with you. The same Eid-Gah is ready where you did a mubahala with Sufi Abdul Haq Ghaznavi and were faced with heavenly disgrace And bring the man who has invited me for a Mubahalah in his book Anjam-e-Atham”””” (Ahl-e-Hadith, 29 March 1907 Page 10).

1907–April 4th
He responds to MGA’s request for a Mubahila.  He refuses to enter into a Mubahila with MGA.

1907–April 14th
“””“I give the good news to Maulvi Sanaullah that Mirza Sahib has accepted his challenge of Mubahalah. Undoubtedly(you) swear that this man  (i.e Mirza Sahib) is false in his claim and then openly state that if I am false in this claim then “May the curse of Allah be upon those who lie”. The verse of the Holy Qur’an upon which the foundation of Mubahalah is set only states that both parties should say, “May the curse of Allah be upon those who lie”””” (Badr, 14 April 1907).  

1907–April 15th
MGA publishes his famous announcement vs. Sanaullah, entitled, “The Final Judgement with Sanaullah”.  In this announcement MGA prays to his God that he should die within the lifetime of Sanaulah, if he (MGA) is indeed a liar and a false prophet.

1907–April 19th
“”“I did not invite you to a Mubahalah, I only expressed my intent to make a sworn statement. However, you call this a Mubahalah, whereas a Mubahalah is when both parties swear against each other. I have only agreed to take an oath not to engage in a Mubahalah. A sworn statement is something else and a Mubahalah is something else”””(Ahl-e-Hadith 19 April 1907).

1907–April 26th
Maulvi Sanaullah published MGA’s prayer in his newspaper (the Ahl e Hadees) to God that he should die within the lifetime of Maulvi Sanaullah if he (MGA) is indeed a false prophet.  He also wrote:

“”””Your writing is not acceptable to me and neither can any sane person accept it.”””
(Akhbar Ahli Hadees, Amratsar, 26th April, 1907).

and

“””In case I die, what argument is my death going to resolve for other people?”””
(Akhbar Ahli Hadees, Amratsar, 26th April, 1907, p. 5).

See also—The Review of Religions, February 1992

1907–May 15th
Haqiqatul Wahy is published by MGA.  Maulvi Sanaullah’s name is mentioned 9 times, however, it is spelled as Thana’ullah.  MGA connects Saadullah with Sanaullah, it seems that the two knew each other.  Saadullah died in February of 1907.

1907–August
In terms of a Mubahila Challenge, Maulvi Sanaullah wrote: 
(Moraqqai Qadiani, August 1907)

“””The Holy Prophet Muhammad, on whom be peace, in spite of being a true prophet, passed away before Maseelma Kazzab. Maseelma in spite of being a liar died after the true person but because he finally died in disappointment and frustration, therefore, there is no doubt in the authenticity of the prayer.”””

1908–May 26th
MGA dies in Lahore of cholera.

1908–June
In his magazine, “Murraqqa Qadiani”, he states:

“””The Krishan of Qadian published an announcement of Mubahalah on 15 April 1907″””(Muraqqa-e-Qadiani, June 1908, Page 18).  

1908–July
Maulvi Sanaullah is mentioned in the Ahmadi newspaper Al-Hakam, as he argued that MGA’s prophethood only lasted 6 1/2 years, since it started in 1901.

1909
Maulvi Sanaullah has a debate with top Ahmadi’s in Rampur.  Mufti Muhammad Sadiq and Maulvi Ahsan Amrohi were there representing Ahmadi’s.

1911, roughly April or May
Maulvi Sanaullah comments on Mirza Basheer ud Din’s famous essay wherein the Mirza calls all Muslims as Kafirs (see Truth about the Split).

1917
Muraqqaʻ-i Qadiani (The Qadiani Mosaic), 1917, 64 pages is published.

1918
He debated Ahmadi’s in Kartarpur, British-India.

1923
“Shahadat-e-Mirza” is published, Maulvi Sanaullah also published a 6-month challenge to all Ahmadi’s to respond.  Tarikh-i Mirza (History of Mirza), 1923, 64 pages is also published.

1924
In a 3-day conference held in Qadian on April 1-3, 1924, by non-Ahmadis, Maulavi Sanaullah boasted about his challenge and his books and claimed that no one had written a rebuttal (See Hidden Treasures).  Jalal-ud-Din Shams when writing the introduction of Hudur’s book says:  I came to know in December 1923 about the existence of this book, and when I came to Qadian I inquired whether anyone had received a copy of this book. As no one knew about it, I had to trace this book and wrote a strong rebuttal that appeared in the issue of April 1924 of the Review of Religions. Qadi Muhammed Zahooruddin Akmal, the editor of Review of Religions, in an introductory remarks to the rebuttal, said that he received the manuscript on January 31, 1924.  The daily al-Fadl in its issue of April 8, 1924, carried the news that a copy of the issue containing the rebuttal of the book was sent to Maulavi Sanaullah under registered cover.

1926
Nikat-i Mirza, 1926, 40 pages is published.

1928
ʻAqaʼid-i Mirza (Beliefs of Mirza), 1928, 8 pages is published.  “ilhamat-e-Mirza” is also published.

1929
The Lahori -Ahamdi’s would often send Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi, while that local organisation would also have obtained the services of Maulana Sanaullah.  So Maulana Sanaullah was on the same platform and in the same team representing Muslims with a well known Lahori Ahmadi scholar (who had taken the bai`at at the hands of the Promised Messiah in 1907)!  As an example, we have a booklet entitled Munazira, published by the Anjuman Nusrat-ul-Islam of Hyderabad, Sind (an orthodox Muslim body), being the account of a debate between the Arya Samaj and Muslim representatives in January 1929.

Here is the link. (Opens in new window)

On the first day, Maulana Sanaullah appeared against a Pandit (see p. 14). On the second day, Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi appeared against another pandit (see p. 24). The speeches of all the representatives are reproduced.

Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi told us (including me) many anecdotes about Sanaullah’s replies at the debates which were sometimes silly. For example, an Arya asked “Can Allah create another God like Him if He is all-powerful?”, implying of course that there would then be two Gods. Sanaullah replied: Yes, Allah can create another God like Him, but the created God will say ‘I am not the real God’, so there would still be only one God. Maulana Abdul Haq said to us: I knew what a blistering reply the Arya would give to this foolish response, and so he did. The Arya said: This means that either the first God is wrong because he didn’t manage to create a God like him, or the created God is wrong because he is saying I am not a real God! So there is a conflict between the two Gods, one saying “I have created a God like Me”, and the other saying “No, I am not the real God”!

Once Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi published a challenge addressing Sanaullah and saying: You said in a gathering in my presence: “I (Sanaullah) have made a lot of money by opposing Mirza”. Can you deny saying this?

1930’s
Maulvi Sanaullah had many public debates with an Ahmadi-Mullah named Maulana Abul ‘Ata Jallundhari.  Maulana Abul ‘Ata Jallundhari was born in district Jallundhar in 1904. At the age of eleven his father brought him to Qadian for studies, where he completed his Honours in Arabic with distinction.  For five years he served as the Missionary In-charge for Palestine, and acquired great proficiency in Arabic. He started al-Bushra magazine in 1933 and also started the magazine al- Furqan. He wrote numerous books in Urdu and Arabic.  He served as the Principal of Jami‘ah Ahmadiyyah and Jami‘atul- Mubashshirin from 1944 to 1958. He was also one of the members of the delegations of the Ahmadiyyah Muslim Jama‘at in 1953 and 1974 to the Government of Pakistan. He also served as a member of the Ifta’ [Jurisprudence] Committee for many years until his death.  He is one of the three members of the Ahmadiyyah Muslim Jama‘at who have been given the title, “Khalid-e-Ahmadiyyat” by Hadrat Musleh-e-Mau‘udra.(See Nubuwwat and Khilafat, 1966).

1933
ʻAjaʼibat Mirza risālah “ʻIlm-i Kalam-i Mirza” ka doosra hissa (The Oddities of the booklet ‘Writings of Mirza as Literature’, part two), 1933, 25 pages is published.

1944
What seems to be his final comments on Ahmadiyya were given in the Ahl-e-Hadees newspaper of 1944.  The British had just won WW-2 and the idea of a Muslim state was always in the press.

1947

“In August 1947, Amritsar was the scene of a mini-doomsday. The death-afflicting storm of rioting completely enfolded the residence of Maulana, and even though he succeeded in evacuating himself and his family out into safety, his only youthful son Ataullah was cruelly slaughtered under his very eyes and the horror of that grief minced his heart into pieces.”  (Al Aitzan June, 15 1962 page 10).  

 

And also:

 

Maulvi Abdul Majid Sohdarvi, biographer of Maulvi Sanaullah, writes: “The moment he left his house, vagabonds and looters who were waiting for the opportunity swept in and took everything, including all the household items, cash and jewelry. After looting and robbing, they put the house on fire. That was, however, not the end of it; the looters also put on fire and turned to ashes Maulana’s most precious and valuable collection of books which included some very rare publications worth thousands of rupees and which he had brought together after great pains and expense. The loss of these books was no less distressing to Maulana than the loss of his only son. Those books were the most valuable estate of his life and some of them were so rare that it was not only difficult but impossible to replace them” … “This violent grief remained with Maulana until his death and, in fact, these two tragic incidents were the major cause of his sudden death. The sudden loss of his only son and the burning of his most precious collection of books, and the affliction of both of these misfortunes over a short while claimed his life (Seerati Sanai, Maqbool Aam Press, Lahore).

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/05/30/who-is-maulvi-saadullah-or-saadullah-or-sadullah-of-ludhiana-died-jan-1907/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

Tafser Sanai BY:Moulana Sanaullah Amratsari تفسیر ثنائی از مولانا ثناء اللہ امرتسری

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/14/who-is-syed-muhammad-hussain-batalvi-1840-1920/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/maulvi-sanuallah-acknowledges-that-mga-claimed-prophethood-in-nov-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/17/maulvi-sanaullah-visited-qadian/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/09/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-4159-4160-in-the-ahmadiyya-qurans-before-the-death-of-jesus-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/out-of-fear-from-ahmadis-and-mgas-fake-prophecies-batalvi-registered-to-buy-a-gun-1898-1899-but-was-denied/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Ijaz-e-Ahmadi.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/02/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-disparaging-comments-on-abu-hurairah/

http://alhafeez.org/rashid/death.html

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/14/the-final-decision-with-mawlana-sanaullah-amritsari-by-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1907/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/20/a-muslim-is-one-who-accepts-all-those-appointed-by-god-by-mirza-bashir-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-april-1911/

Maulana Sanaullah of Amritsar

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Cholera

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/10/06/maulvi-sanaullah-vs-maulana-ghulam-rasul-sahib-rajeki-debate-in-kartarpur-in-1918/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/10/ilhamat-e-mirza-in-english-as-the-revelations-of-mirza-by-sanaullah-amritsari/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-sanaullah/

Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

  1.  “Markazi Jamiat Ahle Hadees Hind”Archived from the original on 2017-10-12.
  2. ^ “Biography of Shaykh Al-Islam Thanaullah Amritsari”
  3. ^ “Sanaullah Amritsari – wiki”wiki.qern.orgArchived from the original on 2016-10-02.
  4. ^ “Tafseer Sanai (By Molana Sana ullah Amritsary) — Australian Islamic Library”AUSTRALIAN ISLAMIC LIBRARYArchived from the original on 2016-09-30.
  5. ^ Faz̤lurraḥmān bin Muḥammad. (11 February 1988). “Hazrat Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari”Archived from the original on 11 February 2018 – via Hathi Trust.
  6. ^ Qureshi, Aqeel (25 April 2016). “Seerat sanai(Hazrat Molana Sanaullah Amritsari RA) ~ Siqarah Public Library islam pora jabber”Archived from the original on 19 October 2016.

Who is Hakim Fazl Din of Bhera?

Intro
He was also from Bhera like his close friend and brother-in-law, the famous Maulvi Noorudin.  He seems to have owned and operated the famous press in Qadian wherein the majority of MGA’s books and announcements were published from.  He seems to have died in roughly 1909.

1890
MGA mentions Hakeem Fadl Din of Bhera as a sincere friend in his book, “Fath e Islam”, or in english as “The Victory of Islam” (see the Lahori-Ahmadi translation).

The quote
“”””Another one of our friends is Hakim Fazal Din of Bhera. I have no words to describe the depth of love, sincerity, goodly devotion, and spiritual connection which the Hakim Sahib bears towards me. He is a true well-wisher and sincere sympathizer of mine, and has the power of discerning the truth. After God the Most High had directed my attention to writing this pamphlet, and gave me good hope by His special revelations, I mentioned the idea to several people, but none agreed with me. This dear brother of mine, however, even without my mentioning it to him, urged me of his own accord to write this pamphlet, and contributed Rs.100 from his own pocket towards its expenses. I marvel at his spiritual foresight, as to how his exhortation concurred with the will of God the Most High. He is always rendering service without show, and has contributed many hundreds of rupees to this cause confidentially, merely to attain the pleasure of Allah. May God the Most High grant him a goodly reward!””””

1891 Delhi Debate
Hakim Fadl Din was there in Delhi with MGA as he debated lots of the ulema (See Life of Ahmad also).

1892
He helped financially to get lots of new buildings built around MGA’s mansion.

1895
Hakim Fadal Din started a press at Qadian in 1895. It was named Diya’ul Islam. This press produced MGA’s publications at cost price (MGA’s statement in Karam Din’s case, Section 420. I.P.C. dated. 19.8.1903). It was for this reason that MGA produced, on 15.8.1898 a detailed account of this press in the income tax case. (See statement of Hakim Fadl Din in Karam Din’s case on 20.7.1903)(See Dard also).

1896
He is listed in the first 313 list of Ahmadi’s.  He is #23.  He already had 2 wives by 1896.  The status of his children are unknown.

1903-1904
He was MGA’s co-defendant in the famous Karam Din defamation case wherein MGA had initially lost (see Also Tadhkirah).

1909—1910 era
He dies.  His property at Qadian seems to have donated to the Anjuman at Qadian.  The Anjuman wanted to sell the property at full price.  (See pages 251-257 of “Truth About the Split”).  The Khalifa wanted the property to be sold to last owner, before Hakim Fadl Din, however, the Sadr Anjuman disobeyed the Khalifa and sold the property to the highest bidder.

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/12/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-maulvi-karam-din-court-case-1903-1905-references-from-the-2009-edition-of-tadhkirah-and-some-other-sources/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/books/fath-islam/fath.htm

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

An Ahmadiyya album from the 1920’s which proves that Ahmadiyya was supported and appreciated by the British

Intro
Dear readers, we have found an Ahmadiyya album from the 1920’s.  It seems to have lots of quotes from Britishers (colonist) from the 1920’s.  This album proves that the British government was working with Ahmadiyya to convert Muslims to Ahmadiyya and thus create loyal subjects out of Muslims.  They even posted pictures of the sons of Maulvi Abdul Latif.  The story of Abdul Hamid and Captain Douglas is also posted here.  Sufi Ghulam Muhammad and his mission to Mauritius are also written about.  Also, how 20,000 Africans from Lagos joined Ahmadiyya in a single day.  The Khalifa’s tour of London and Paris are also mentioned.  It also mentions how lots of Arabs in Kababir joined Ahmadiyya in the late 1920’s and early 1930′s.  This album gives lots of rare pictures.

The album
Ahmadiyya Album

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/01/the-ahmadiyya-movement-and-its-western-propaganda-by-james-thayer-addison-1929/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/26/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-called-the-killing-of-maulvi-abdul-latif-as-greater-then-that-of-imam-hussain/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/11/syed-abdul-latif-accompanied-mga-to-jhelum-in-january-of-1903/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/11/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-terrible-arabic-pronunciation-and-syed-abdul-lateef/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karam

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/The-Afghan-Martyrs-by-B.A.Rafiq.pdf

https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1154&context=afghanuno

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Douglas

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Kababir

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Who is Mufti Muhammad Sadiq (1872–1957)?

Intro
Per Ahmadiyya sources only, he was born in Bhera, Pakistan on January 11, 1872(which was in British India at that time), which is roughly 100 miiles from modern day Rabwah, he died in Rabwah on January 13, 1957 at age 85.  Muhammad Sadiq was a student of Noorudin in Jammu (roughly 1880–1890).  Per Ahmadiyya sources, he was dropped off by his father (Mufti Inaytullah Qureshi Usmani) for religious training in the 1880’s, his father died before 1889, his mother, Faiz Bibi, joined Ahmadiyyat between 1896 and 1897, per Ahmadiyya sources only.  Per the order of Noorudin, he visited Qadian in later 1890 and signed the Bait form, however, he might have also been present at Ludhiana for the firs bait in 1889, since so many lies have been told about this entire event.  He would go back and forth, from his job in Jammu to Qadian quite frequently.  He was never a Mufti, this title was given to him by MGA and other Ahmadi’s, who also seem to have called his father a Mufti, which is also wrong.  In the 1920’s, they also began to call him as Dr., however, we have proved that he had posted fake degrees while he was in America, just in an attempt to fulfill a prophecy of MGA wherein it was stated Mufti Muhammad Sadiq would get degrees.

His wife and children?
Per Ahmadiyya sources, in late 1900, when Mufti Muhammad Sadiq moved to Qadian, he moved in with his 2 children and wife.  They all lived with MGA, in his inner circle, inside of MGA’s mansion.  We are unclear on when they moved out or whatever happened to these kids.

—Son, Muhammad Manzur Umar (born in roughly 1895).
—Son, Abdus Salam Umar (born in roughly 1889). See Seerat Ashab-e-Ahmad video, at the 12:45 mark).  The name of his wife is also unknown.

1880’s
His father sends him to Jammu to learn Islam from Noorudin.

Late 1890
He travels to Qadian and meets MGA with a letter from Noorudin, vouching for him.  He was working at Jammu Highschool, Noorudin helped him get this job.  He seems to have read Fath e Islam in this era, which again proves that this book was written and published in early 1890, contrary to Ahmadiyya sources.  Maulvi Abdul Kareem was also working in Jammu in those days and he also vouched for Sadiq.

1891 in Ludhiana
While MGA had his famous debates going on, Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was working as a spy on MGA’s behalf.

1895
He seems to have been in Qadian during the double eclipse during Ramadhan.  He also moved to Lahore wherein he got a job in the Office of Accountant General as a clerk, where he worked till 1901.  Nevertheless, he came to Qadian every Sunday to help with editing work.

1900-1901
He moves to Qadian, with his wife and 2 kids and begins to live exclusively with MGA, in MGA’s house.  He was also involved in writing vs. Pir Mehr Ali Shah in this era.  His room was above MGA’s, and thus he heard all the conversations in the mansion.

1902
He writes to Dowie and Piggot on behalf of MGA and issues death prophecies.

1903-1904
He traveled with MGA to his court cases.  This was the famous case of Karam Din.  It seems that MGA was denied a chair in this court case and thus, Ahmadiyya sources tell us that Mufti Muhammad Sadiq would sit on the ground and MGA would hover above him, in some weird type of way.  He was also a teacher at the Talim ul Islam Middle and High School in this era.  Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was ill in these days and was given drugs by Noorudin and MGA which has high levels of opium in them.

1905
After the Talim ul Islam School was shut down, MGA made Sadiq as the editor of the Al-Badr.  Since the old owner (Munshi Muhammad Afzal) and editor of the Badr had died (March 21st, 1905).  This was his only job.

May 1908
Ahmadiyya sources tell us that the offices of the Al-Badr newspaper were moved to Lahore, along with Noorudin and Maulvi Ahsan Amrohi.  However, Mufti Muhammad Sadiq is not mentioned.

May 28, 1908
Ahmadiyya sources tell us that Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was in Qadian and read out the announcement of Noorudin’s unanimous election as Khalifa (see Quotes from the Al-Badr, Issue of June 8, 1908, see also “Hakeem Noorudin” by Syed Hasanat Ahmad, pages 112-113).

Late-1909-1910
He was sent on a preaching tour of British-India and admitted that he didn’t openly teach that MGA was a prophet.

1912
In the Al-Badr, he wrote an essay entitled: What was the occupation of the Promised Messiah?

1913-1914
The Al-Badr newspaper is shut down by force by the British Government.  Some governmental archives show how the Al-Badr and Nur Afshan newspapers were beefing with each other and causing lots of strife, the Ahl-e-Hadis newspaper was also involved.  It seems that Mufti Muhammad Sadiq became a Christian in this era.  See here—Religious Controversy between Nur Afshan and Ahmadiyya 3

1914–March
He is totally missing from scene by 1914.

1915–1917
He seems to have been the editor of the Sadiq, which was a new and short lived newspaper (See Walter).

1917
Mufti Sadiq left for England on March 10, 1917 as a missionary. He remained involved in the propagation of Islam during his voyage. He reached London on April 17, 1917, and joined Qazi Muhammad Abdullah who was already active in spreading the message of Islam. Mufti Sadiq spent about two and a half years in England and published many tracts during his stay.

1920
Mufti Sadiq sailed from England on January 26, 1920, and reached Philadelphia in the second week of February. The immigration department blocked his entry into the U.S.A. on the grounds that he was not allowed to preach the message of God.  Sadiq set up his first headquarters in April 1920 at 1897 Madison Avenue in New York City.  On October, 1920, Dr. Sadiq moved the headquarters of the Ahmadiyya mission to Chicago because of its central location. He purchased a house in an affluent area of Chicago, at 4448 S. Wabash, and converted it to a mosque.

1921
He launches the Muslim Sunrise, a new newspaper which would be the mouthpiece of Ahmadiyya in America.  He lies and claims that there are 700,000 Ahmadi’s in the world.

1923
He left America, and returned to Qadian, British India on Sep­tember 18, 1923, and arrived in Darul Aman on December 4, 1923 in the afternoon.

1924
When the Khalifa left for the his tour of the UK, he left Mirza Bashir Ahmad and Mufti Muhammad Sadiq as in-charge.

1926
Different departments were joined together with Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya (central executive body of the Community) in 1926 and Mufti Sadiq served as Head of Foreign Affairs, and later as Head of General Affairs, sometimes supervising both divisions. He also continued to pursue writing and public speaking.  He writes and publishes the controversial book, “Zikr-e-Habeeb”, wherein many details of MGA’s life are accidentally revealed.  In this book, he also helped to change MGA’s year of birth from 1839 to 1835.

1927
He was sent to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) in 1927.  Mufti Sadiq returned to Qadian on November 6, 1927, after completing his mission in Ceylon. He then visited several cities in India (including Kinanoor Cant., Paingadi, Calicut, Bengalore, Calcutta, Brahman Barhya, Dacca, Rangpur) at the direction of Khalifatul Masih II for Tabligh purposes.

1928
he visited Ka­rachi and Calcutta. He traveled to Sri Lanka once again to introduce the teachings of True Islam.

1934
He was sent to the tomb of Yuz Asaf and wrote a book about it.

1935
He became Private Secretary to Khalifatul Masih II in 1935.  He conducted the Nikah ceremony of Khalifatul Masih II with Syedah Maryam Siddiqa on September 30, 1935, and delivered a faith-inspiring address at the time.

1937
He retired himself from the day-to-day duties of Sadr Anjuman in 1937 because of ill health but continued to render religious services as usual.

1947
He migrated to Lahore from Qadian with the Khalifa and then later to Rawbah.

1952
He is sent to Africa by the Khalifa for management and preaching.  He was in Sierra Leone and was sent to Liberia to officially start the Ahmadiyya mission there.

1957
He passed away on January 13, 1957. Khalifatul Masih II led the Namaz-i-Janaza (Funeral Prayer) of this devotee of the Promised Messiah. He was buried in Bahishti Maqbara, Rabwah, Pakistan.

Links and Related Essays
https://www.alislam.org/book/hakeem-noor-ud-deen/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/02/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-was-a-student-of-noorudin-pre-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/17/ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-the-first-bait-ceremony-in-1889/

http://wiki.qern.org/mirza-ghulam-ahmad/biography/followers/mufti-muhammad-sadiq

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhera

https://www.alislam.org/v/6101.html

https://www.alislam.org/v/30.html

Mufti Muhammad Sadiq r.a. – An Early Ray of Western Sunrise

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karam+Din

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/06/the-life-and-death-of-maulvi-abdul-karim-sialkoti/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/10/what-is-the-talim-ul-islam-high-school-college-at-qadian-and-later-at-rabwah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/05/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-travelled-to-the-tomb-of-yuz-asaf-in-1934/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/06/zikr-e-habib-by-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-1936/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/15/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-helped-change-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-from-1839-40-to-1835/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/24/what-was-the-occupation-of-the-promised-messiah-by-mufti-muhammad-sadiq/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/23/in-1891-when-mga-made-his-big-claims-he-denied-prophethood-mufti-sadiq-was-heavily-involved/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/31/in-1921-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-claimed-that-there-were-700000-ahmadis-in-the-world/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/11/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-frequented-british-opera-houses-in-the-punjab-per-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-his-companion/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/23/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-was-drugged-by-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

  1.  Elijah Muhammad and Islam By Herbert Berg pg. 18
  2. ^ Islam in the African-American Experience By Richard Brent Turner pg.124-5, 130
  3. ^ We are All Moors: Ending Centuries of Crusades Against Muslims and Others By Anouar Majid pg 81
  4. ^ Islam in the African-American Experience By Richard Brent Turner pg.116
  5. ^ Elijah Muhammad and Islam By Herbert Berg pg. 19
  6. ^ Islam in the African-American Experience By Richard Brent Turner pg.121Tags
    #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

In 1937, was the Mirza family was suffering the divine the wrath of their false claims?

Intro
Per MGA and other Ahmadiyya sources, any opponent of Ahmadiyya will die miserably.  However, they didn’t apply these requirements onto themselves.  As we all know, the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahud Ahmad died in terrible fashion.  We have found some additional data on Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahud Ahmad and his mother from 1937.  It seems that MGA’s widowed wife, Nusrat Jehan was suffering from an extreme case of diarrhea in 1937 and the Khalifa had a sore throat, by 1952, the Khalifa was unable to walk and would have to be carried.  Interestingly enough, Fakhr ud Din Multani was fatally stabbed just a month before it was announced that the Khalifa has been nursing a sore throat.

The data from this newspaper scan
Alfazal -Qadian 14 Sep-1937 / Title :Madeena Maseeh (Translation : City of Maseeh): Reported Qadian 13 sep- Syedna hazrat Ameer ul Momoinein Khalifa 2nd may god help him, about him the report of Doctor is present at 8 Pm. The Pain of Throat of Hazrat has not been finished till now. friends must pray for his health. Hazrat Ummul mominyein has complaint about diarrhea.  Hazrat Mir Mohammad Ismail sb is also sick. Please pray for him too.  

The scan work

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/05/16/who-is-mir-muhammad-ishaq-1890-1944-the-brother-in-law-of-mga/

 

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/18/most-of-mir-nasir-nawabs-family-were-killed-by-british-soldiers-during-the-1857-mutiny/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/24/mir-nasir-nawab-wrote-poetry-vs-mga-initially-1891-2-years-later-he-accepted-mgas-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/29/hyat-e-nasir-by-mir-nasir-nawab-the-full-pdf-book/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/08/how-mga-and-mir-nasir-nawab-met-from-seeratul-mahdi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/19/ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-the-age-of-mgas-second-wife/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-young-wife-didnt-do-parda-this-is-against-the-parda-laws-in-rabwah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/10/did-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-wife-wish-to-be-released-from-her-marriage/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/13/when-did-mgas-marriage-with-his-second-wife-nusrat-jehan-take-place-what-year/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/08/mir-nasir-nawab-the-father-in-law-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://www.alislam.org/friday-sermon/printer-friendly-summary-2018-02-09.html

https://www.alislam.org/v/2355.html

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/16/nuzul-ul-masih-or-the-descent-of-the-messiah-published-posthumously-in-1909-and-quotes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/10/what-is-the-talim-ul-islam-high-school-college-at-qadian-and-later-at-rabwah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/30/who-were-the-members-of-the-sadr-anjuman-ahmadiyya-aka-executive-body-of-control-in-1906-1911/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/10/failed-prophecy-of-mga-regarding-the-birth-of-a-son-to-miyan-manzur-muhammad-1906-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/03/04/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-lost-his-court-case-vs-karam-uddin-1904-but-won-on-appeal/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/28/who-is-sufi-ahmad-jan-of-ludhiana-aka-munshi-ahmad-jan/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Per the order of Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Abdul Shakoor meets Trump and tells him about how Ahmadi’s are dying

Intro
The Ahmadiyya marketing team and political thrust is in full force.  Recently, a criminal in Pakistan, Abdul Shakoor was released from prison after serving 3 years in jail of a 5 year sentence.  We think the officials were bribed by Ahmadi’s in the West, we had recently seen a donation of $100,000 by the Ahmadiyya community in Canada to some Pakistani officials and wondered why?  In Rabwah, they have been bribing the local police for years.  This is nothing new however, the Mirza family has worked with the British government since 1889, helping British interests in South Asia and receiving compensation accordingly.

The Mirza family has been urging Ahmadi’s to break the law in Pakistan and thus forward more asylum claims
The Mirza family doesn’t care if a few Ahmadi’s die.  They want more and more Ahmadi’s to get out of Pakistan and to continue to fuel their million dollar family legacy, hence, Abdul Shakoor is another example of this.

Abdul Shakoor meets Trump
After getting released from jail early, him and his entire family were expedited in the asylum process and sent to the USA.  Remember…currently, there is a huge political issue wherein refugees and asylum seekers are stuck on the USA Southern border wherein children are separated from their parents and forced to live in cages.  However, Ahmadi’s and other minorities are given asylum by the Trump regime in terms of PR and good press.

Ahmadi’s are brainwashed to break the law in Pakistan
Remember, the Mirza family purposely got themselves declared as non-muslims in 1974 and then purposely got Ord-XX passed in 1984.  Mirza Tahir Ahmad was already radicalizing Ahmadi’s since he took over ion 1982.

The Mirza family has been colluding with the British since 1889
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s father, Mirza Ghulam Murtaza was in the Sikh military and totally turned on them in 1849 and helped the British take over the Punjab.  For this help, he was favored for this rest of his life.  In fact, every time MGA went to court, he was given a chair to sit on, whereas all other brown people were forced to stand for hours and hours.  Furthermore, every time MGA was found guilty of any crime, he was made innocent on appeal by British judges.

Mehershalla Ali and the Ahmadiyya caucus
Ali is not a Muslim and has never been a Muslim.  He fell in love with an Ahmadi girl in college and thus converted.  His Ahmadi wife is also a singer and only remained loyal to Ahmadiyya because her father was an early convert to Ahmadiyya, thus, she is only Ahmadi out of respect for her father.

Qasim Rashid’s bid to get into politics and aid the Mirza family
Qasim Rashid hates Trump and has been ordered to enter politics.  

Imran Khan is about to visit America and meet Trump
In a few weeks, Imran Khan will visit America…lets see what happens.  Ahmadiyya leaders will ask to meet with him.

Kareem Ahmad’s was a mega donor looking for political opportunities for the Ahmadiyya Movement
He is still under federal prosecution, however, based on his political ties, he might beat the case.

Amjad Khan’s political work
Amjad Khan is a Harvard level lawyer.  His entire life is spent helping the Mirza family.

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=mega+donor

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/26/ahmadiyya-mullahs-and-their-black-ops-1973-1974/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=caucus

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Qasim+

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/evidence-which-proves-that-mirza-tahir-ahmad-radicalized-ahmadis-as-soon-as-he-came-to-power-1982/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/15/who-is-mirza-ghulam-murtaza-1791-1876/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karam+din

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/13/mahershala-ali-loves-dancing-doesnt-promote-humanity-first-and-lets-people-drink-around-him/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam #muslimsonthehill #uyghur #abdulshakoor

Up ↑