We have written extensively on the topic of Lekh Ram and his engagements with MGA. Feel free to read that before you read any further. We have found a poem vs. MGA which was published in the Ariya Musafir, which was a newspaper of the Arya Samaj. Here is a poem “qadiai Nabi Kee Shaan”, at the time of murder of Pundit Lekh Ram. There was a special edition of Ariya Musafir paper, dedicated to the shahadat of Lekh Ram and this poem comes from that paper.
QADIANI NABI KI SHAN
Hai pakri hath mein mala
Magar dunya pe matwala
Kahe chanda idhar la la
Wo mirza Qadian wala
Na jisko dharam se ulfat
Na tha kuch deen se matlab
Na jhagron se jise fursat
Woh mirza Qadiani wala.
In 1884, Mirza Qadiyani wrote letters to Hindu and Christian Missionaries to come to Qadiyan, stay there for one year they will witness the sign of my prophethood during this period if no such sign witnessed by them, he will pay Rs.2400.00 to such person ( @ Rs200/- per month).
Pandit Lekhram responded to show his willingness to visit Qadiyan. Since Mirza wants this stunt only to prove himself and gain popularity, he created many hurdles to stop him from coming to Qadiyan. Like he sent him a list of strict terms & conditions which include demand of financial guarantee from pandit. He also used delay tactics , yet Pandit Lekhram did not bother, crossed all barriers and reached Qadiyan
His hurricane arrival at Qadiyan took Mirza by surprise. One day Mirza was discussing the terms of his stay at Qadiyan to witness a sign, the discussion diverted toward definition of MOJIZA or
SUPER NATURAL things. LEKHRAM SAID SUPERNATURAL means something which breaks the law of nature. Like, he said, knife is meant to cut , fire,s purpose is to burn And a tree can not walk. Now if you r a truthful prophet you show me some thing where knife do not cut , fire refuse to burn and tree start walking on your permission. IF U SHOW ME ANY OF THIS I WILL EMBRACE ISLAM BUT IF U FAILS TO DO THIS YOU MAY ACCEPT HINDUISM.
Mirza refused to do this by saying such definition of MOJIZA , supernatural is not in Quraan. Lekhram SAID the words MOJIZA HAS NOT BEEN MENTIONED IN QURAN ALTOGETHER. MIRZA INSISTED THAT WORDS IS THERE IN QURAAN. LEKHRAM SAID BRING THE Quraan, Quraan was brought ! Lekhram handed it over to Mirza and said ok show it to me where this word MOJIZA appears in Quraan. Mirza flipped the pages of Quraan over and over but failed to find any such words.
Finally Mirza said ok it is not there i take my words back. Pandit Lekhram has quoted this in his book Takzib Brahin Ahmadiya in mirza,s life but he or Nooruddin could not deny this. Lekhram said Hakim jay kishan, Lala Nihal Chand Lala Lachmi Sahai, Hakim Daya Ram, Kamaluddin the cousin of Mgaq,Munshi Murad Ali and an old man traveler were present at the time of this dialogue.
(Taken from book Raeese Qadiyan quoting from Takzib barahin,ahmadiya. Page 86.).
Dr. Clark helped Abdullah Athim in the famous 15-day debate of 1893, in fact, the debate was held in Dr. Clark’s house in Amritsar. Athim died in 1896, Lekh Ram died in 1897 and now a few people remained alive who had opposed MGA. It seems that MGA sent an undercover Ahmadi to murder Dr. Clark. Read Abdul Hameed’s testimony in the below, it corresponds to pages 138-139 in the Lahori-Ahmadi translation of Kitab ul Barriya (1897). This court case happened in 1897.
Statement of Abdul Hameed
I am the son of Sultan Mahmud who lived in Jhelum. I came to Amritsar about 19 or 20 days ago. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad sahib of Qadian, District Gurdaspur, called me to his house and talked to me. He asked me to go to Dr. Clarke at Amritsar and kill him somehow or other. He knew me already but spoke to me about this affair on that particular day. I agreed that I would do just as he had asked. I did this because I am a Muslim and Dr. Clarke was a Christian. Mirza sahib had told me that it was permissible for a Muslim to kill a Christian. Then I went to Amritsar with this intention. I went to Dr. Clarke and said that I was first a Hindu, then I became a Muslim and now wanted to become a Christian. I also told him that I had been sent by Mirza
sahib. Dr. Clarke sent me to the hospital where Christians live and receive education. I stayed in Amritsar for four or five days. Then Dr. Clarke sent me to another hospital which is in Beas. Yesterday Dr. Clarke asked me why I had come to Amritsar. Then I disclosed the real truth and said that I had been sent by Mirza sahib to kill Dr. Clarke, but I had now changed my mind. I feel sorry and repent. I have had this statement written of my own free will. I was a follower of Mirza sahib for two or three months at Qadian, prior to his asking me to go to Amritsar. Before going to Qadian, I have been at Gujrat where a Christian clergyman used to teach me. He wanted to send me to Rawalpindi but Muslims took hold of me and sent me to Mirza sahib. My father was a farmer and a maulvi. He was not a follower of Mirza sahib. After his death, my paternal uncle Burhan-ud-Din brought me up. He lived in Jhelum and was a follower of Mirza sahib. I had another paternal uncle Luqman. He married my mother after the death of my father. No one was present when Mirza sahib instructed me to go to Amritsar. He took me to a separate room in his house and said this to me. While I was with Mirza sahib I only studied the
Quran. Maulvi Nur-ud-Din taught me. Before that particular day when he asked me to do this job, Mirza sahib liked me very much. But before that he never said anything to me about the murder of Dr. Clarke. Nor did Hakim Nur-ud-Din do so. I do not know if any other man came from Qadian after me. Mirza sahib asked me to kill Dr. Clarke with a stone when I got an opportunity to find him alone. My paternal uncle Burhan-ud-Din was a zealous Muslim. Mirza sahib had told me to come to Qadian after murdering Dr. Clarke. I would be quite safe there. I am Gakhhtar by caste. I am sixteen or seventeen years old.
Read and accepted correct.
1st August 1897.
Seal: True copy, Signature
Head Clerk. Signed.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, and most Ahmadis today are fond of engaging people into a match of cursing each other and etc. Its really sick. Even 100+ years ago, Ahmadis were doing the same. We have come across some references wherein Lekh Ram is admitting that it was because of MGA that he began to ridicule Islam. The scan in the below is from “Takzeeb Braheen Ahmadiyya” which was written by Lekh Ram in the late 1880’s.
This blog entry was inspired by a question that I fielded on twitter. An Ahmadi had asked me about the prophecies of MGA, he was asking in terms of how was it possible that MGA had so many prophecies come true and etc. This Ahmadi, much like the majority of Ahmadis believe that ALL the prophecies of MGA had come true and this somehow proved MGA’s truthfulness.
In this short essay I will show just one example of MGA’s boasting-type-attitude and his non-stop deception, his constant lying, his never admitting to his mistakes, and other patterns of behavior that will shock even the most savage of men. In the case of Lekh Ram vs. MGA, it is obvious that the Ahmadi-mullah team have tried their very vest to erase much of the evidence, nonetheless, i present the current research of 2016.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________MGA’s beef with the Arya Samaj-Hindus of the Punjaab
After the publishing of BA-vol. 4, MGA began challenging the Hindus of India to a death contest, and by Ahmadiyya standards they call it a Mubahila. This is also called the 1-year challenge. There were about 15 Arya Samajist in Qadian in those days (see page 78), it is interesting to note that Dard calls Arya-Samaj a cult on page 79, he seems to ignore the idea that Ahmadiyya is also a cult, like scientology. Nonetheless, MGA had beefed with the Arya Samaaj since at least 1875 (Dard) and his beef continued. This is against the Quran, since allah tells us to never criticize the Gods of other religions. So obviously, MGA was ignoring a command of Allah and thus critisizing the God of the Hindus (see the Quran, 6:108, Tafsir Ibn Kathir). In the history of Islam, no Muslim of India had ever challenged Hindus to Mubahila. In fact, most muslims of the world had never ever done any Mubahila, and in fact, Muhammad (saw) never did any Mubahila. The delegation of Christians that he met were in terms of collecting Jizya, which was a socio-political issue, not a matter of “lets argue religion”.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ In 1885, Lekh Ram comes to Qadian
As everyone knows, this is the real prophecy vs. Lekh Ram. However, it doesn’t mention Lekh Ram at all, in fact, it is mostly about the Promised Son. It seems like that Ahmadi-mullah-team has edited all of those utterances totally out.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The March 1, 1886 Prophecy
“””like Munshi Inderman Muradabadi and Pandit Lekhram Peshawari, about whose destiny and fate something will be written in this booklet (i.e. Siraj Muneer) provided there is enough time and the timing is right . . . I do so with a heavy heart . . . and if someone does not like a prophecy about them to be printed in this booklet . . . entitled to send me a written and signed statement by March 1, 1886, or within two weeks of the publication of this booklet . . ” (Collection of Advertisements, vol 1, pp 99-100) Lekhram promptly replied with a postcard asking to publish whatever Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wanted to publish about him. (RK, Vol 5. p.250).”””
“What is the entitlement of the corpse-eating Liar that Heaven should show a sign for him and the earth should exhibit paranormal spectacles?” (Siraj-e-Muneer, Roohani Khazain vol.12 p. 3)
“Lekhram’s age is at present at the most 30 years and he is a young man of robust built in good health. And this humble self is little more than 50 years old and weak and permanently sick and is afflicted with different kind of illnesses. Despite that, it will be evident in this contest which thing is from human being and which is from God.” (Siraj-e-Muneer, Roohani Khazain vol. 12 p. 17)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________All prophecies vs. the Arya Samaaj and Lekh Ram had expired by 1891
In 1892, Lekh Ram’s life was in danger
From 1890-1893, a 3-year-period, MGA was silent on Lekh Ram. All of sudden in 1893, MGA predicted the death of Lekh Ram in 6 years. This is MGA and his team being dishonest yet again. The saga and Mubahilas with the Arya Samaaj and Lekh Ram had all expired, MGA and Lekh Ram were still alive. MGA admitted to making a prophecy about Lekh Ram in 1886, however, that is as far as he goes.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ In 1897, Lekh Ram is murdered and the the doctors assistance is an Ahmadi
All of the Mubahilas between MGA and the Arya Samaaj seem to have ended by 1891. MGA claimed that Lekh Ram would be punished and etc etc. However, that happened, so in 1893, MGA simply re-issued the same mubahila and attached a 6-year period to it. Later on, he would attach a 15-month death prophecy vs. Abdullah Athim which also failed.
The Ahmadiya editorial team seems to have struck again, as they continue to tie up loose ends in the writings of MGA. Its non-stop.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays
Lekh Ram wrote extensively vs. Ahmadiyya from 1885-1890. I will post the quotes here.
Dard tells us (page 159) that Lekh Ram and the Arya Samaaj issued a special leaflet was issued at the Chashma Nur, Amritsar on July 27th, 1886, in which Ahmad was threatened with murder within three years. However, this was not a threat, this was in retaliation to MGA’s mubahila-challenge. MGA seems to have issued the same type of death prophecy vs. Lekh Ram, unfortunately, the Ahmadiyya editors seem to have erased the data. Based on this admission by Dard, MGA should have died by at least 1890-1891. And thus all of these “death-threats” that were issued back and forth came to an end in 1890-1891.
Below are some quotations from this famous book by Lekh Ram.
The quotes “O Permeshwar (God) make decision between us truly; let your Sat Dharma (true religion) flow forth not by sword but through love, understanding, submission of proof and open out the adversary’s heart by conferment of Sat Gayan (True wisdom ) on him so that ignorance, prejudice, oppression and outrage are destroyed because a liar can never glorify in Thy Audience like the truthful. Writer: Your eternal slave, Lekh Ram Sharma, Sabhasud, Arya Samaj, Peshawar”. (Nuskha-e-Khabte Ahmadiya, P. 347; ret Lekh Ram & Mirza, P. 2, Author: Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari).
“Mirzaji has promised me Rs.500/-. This is his old habit (promising but not paying). Here is a poetic portrayal of his money promise through this couplet:
“””My life if you want dear, I mind it not; But knots of my purse, Oh, open them not!”””
We fully know his moveable and immovable assets and his indebtedness is not unknown to us. We throw his offer of monetary give and take into dust and make a present of those five hundred rupees back to him as betel-leaf chewing expenses from our side, on his on-coming new marriage* for which he says he has received a fresh revelation only recently”. (Nuskha-e-Khabte Ahmadiya, via Rais-e-Qadian, Vol. 1, P. 121).