Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"Muhammadi"

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wanted Muhammadi begum’s husband to be killed

Intro
Dear readers, we have covered the topic of Muhammadi Begum at length.  Read all of these entries first.  We have found some interesting information to add to this saga.  As we were going through Hassan Odeh’s book on Ahmadiyya, we found this reference:

“We will kill her husband, as we killed her father, and will return her to you”

Tadhkirah, page 226. As quoted by Hassan odeh in 2000 in his book on Ahmadiyya, see page 96-97.

What did the Ahmadi’s change?
The word translates as kill, however, Ahmadiyya leadership decided to use destroy.  The word in arabic is used is “mohlaikoon” it is derived from the word “halaaq” means halaaq kerna, or to say ” main nay us murd ko halaaq ker diya, maar diya.

MGA and his team wanted other people to be killed also, Lekh Ram, Abdullah Athim and Dr. Clark
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-sent-abdul-hameed-to-murder-dr-clark-after-lekh-ram-was-murdered/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/18/mga-re-used-the-lekh-ram-prophecy/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Athim

The reference in the 2009 edition of Tadhkirah was changed from kill to destroy

The exact same translation was done in the 2004 edition of Tadhkirah, the 1976 english translation remains unchecked.  

The reference from the 1967 edition of Tadhkirah, URDU

 

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Sialkot #Mosqueattack

MIRZA SULTAN MUHAMMAD AND WIFE MUHAMMADI BEGUM LIVED AND DIED AS MUSLIM. HAD 5 SONS AND TWO DOUGHTERS.

Intro
We have written how the Qadiani-Ahmadi have in their desperation chased and tried to bribe the family of Muhammadi Begum, even after MGA died.  We wrote about how the Qadiani’s faked paperwork and misquoted many people.  Today, we present additional reports from that the 1950–70’s era on this topic, as well as scans.

Summary of these scans

Molana Manzoor. Ahmad Chinioti (1931-2004), was a religious scholar and has been a member parliament in Punjab Assembly. He has great services in the field of religious studies and Khatme Nabuwwat. He is the author of many books on the subject of Khatme Nabuwwat. He had a meeting with Muhammadi Begum, the sign of failed prophesy of Mirza Qadiani. It may be recalled here that Mirza Qadiani had prophesied that Muhammadi Begum would come to his Nikah virgin or divorced.

He wrote about this in the book Paigham Hidyat which has been summarised as under:-
“In June 1965, I along-with Molana Abdullah Ludhianvi Khateeb Jamia Masjid Ghalla Mandi Toba Tek Singh, went to Chak Shahzadian wala District Burewala, to see Muhammadi Begum, who was residing at that place with her eldest son Mirza Ishaq.

The husband of Muhammadi Begum, Mirza Sultan Muhammad migrated to this place from Patti India after partition in 1947. He was allotted 4 Murabba Land (100Acres) by the government. This land was managed by Mirza Ishaq.

It was known that Mirza Ishaq, the son of Muhammadi Begum had converted to Qadianiat due to the enticement of wealth and marriage with Qadiani Girl by the Qadianis, in 1930. The imam of local Masjid and residents of village told that Muhammadi Begum hated her son Mirza Ishaq for getting converted to Qadianiat and never ate food cooked by his wife as long as she was healthy enough to do cooking herself.

Since Muhammaadi Begum was at the last phase of her life at that time, Someone told that Qadianis are planning to take Muhammadi Begum to Rabwah and bury her after death to tell the world that Muhammadi Begum was converted to Ahmadiyya to fulfil the prophesy of Mirza Qadiani.

The Local Masjid Imam accompanied us to the house of Mirza Ishaq. We got seated in the DERA a place outside the house for guests. While we were having an introductory chat with the peoples in Dera, Mirza Ishaq, a tall sturdy man holding a DAANG, (long round baton) and a large utensil on the head, has arrived. He had a loud and heavy voice, after salutation he said Molvi What is it that you are here for ?

I said I wanted to know the address of your brother Asif Sultan. But why do u want to see him, if u need some information from him that U can have better from me. I said you are right, in fact I am here to have some information. Then he start speaking he said he became Ahmadi in 1930 and both his father and mother are non ahmadis.

Referring to the failed prophesy of Mirza upon his mother, father and maternal grand father, I asked him as to why he became Ahmadi, when the living evidence of lies of Mirza Qadiani is present at your home, to which he could not reply convincingly. However, he said it is like Pheri walla ( a mobile shopkeeper in the village), comes to sell his goods and raises his voice whomsoever like to purchase goods of his choice does so. Similarly Mirza sahib Qadiani came he raised a voice that he was Mujaddid Masih and Mahdi of 14th century , this voice appealed to him and he accepted it. Then Mirza Ishaq said ok make me a muslim if you can. Then the talk continued on the claims of Mirza Qadiani in a friendly manners like Mirza writing the months of Safar as the fourth month and Mirza,s claim that his son talked to him in the womb of mother.

Then I enquired him of the health of his mother , he said she has grown older, uses power glasses and listens to louder voice. Few days ago she had a fall injuring her face. Finding him a little softened, I said Mirza Sahib your mother is like my mother and I want to make Ziarah of her and to meet her personally.

He immediately declined to this request saying he has not even allowed an Ahmadi to see her. However, my constant flattery and requests made him change the decision and he said let me get the other ladies of house take aside. After a while he called us inside.

We entered the house to find Muhammadi Begum sitting on a large Palang (a desi bed). We sat on cain wood seats placed around. Respected lady would be at her 90s. Wrinkled face, with spectacle of thick powered glasses a wound mark on a side of face was visible. She had a graceful personality. Her son Mirza Ishaq coming close to her ear said “BAY BAY AEH GHAIR AHMADI MOLVI TUHADI ZIARAT WASTE AYE NE meaning mom these Non Ahmadi Molvis have come to see you. She got happy to listen to this and asked “GHAIR AHMADI NE” R they non Ahmadis ? He replied yes non Ahmadis, She smiled and said ok. I had certain questions to ask from her which could not be asked for many reasons. After sometime we requested her to pray for us which was communicated by Mirza Ishaq to her. She raised her arm to place her hand on our heads and prayed for us. Subsequently, we sought permission to depart Mirza Ishaq Again took his mouth near her ear and said BAY BAY ayh ijazat mang de ne. After few moments She replied IJAZAT HAI. We, then said salam and left the house. “

After that Molana wrote to her four sons in Lahore, requesting them not to allow Qadianis to take their mother to Rabwah. Molana received a reply from her son in law Said Muhammad Baig from Khanqah Dogran one letter from four Muslim sons of Muhammadi Begum duly signed by all four. which are as under:-

Letter from Said Muhammad Baig son in law of MB.

Mohtaram Janab Principal Sahib. Assalamo alaikum.

Your letter addressed to Akhtar Sultan reached to my son who was proceeding on leave to village. Since I have read your letter, it is my duty to reply to you to clarify the situation. This humble self states on oath that he is the son in law of late Sultan Muhammad and Muhammadi Begum and is a close relative to them. They have two daughters out of which one has been married to me. The other one was married to the nephew of Mirza Sultan Muhammad. Both Muhammadi Begum and Mirza Sultan Muhammad belonged to Ahlussannah wal jamaat. Mirzai party did their best to get Mirza Sultan sahib and Muhammadi Begum Sahibah to get to their side but could not succeed. Please do visit us my village Khanqah Dogran sharif lies on Sargodha Lahore road. My mother in law is seriously ill nowadays.Her four sons are in govt service at Lahore. One Mirza Ishaq has accepted Mirzaiyyat due to greed and he is also married in a mirzai family. Rest four namely Muhammad Asif Baig, Muhammad Ashraf Baig,Akbar Baig, and Akhtar Sultan are muslims of Ahlussannah waljamaat. They are in Govt service and reside in Choburji Quarter No.11A. You can meet them at 3 o clock at evening.
Wel wisher
Said Muhammad Baig.

Letter from four sons of MB.

Respected Manzoor Ahmad Chinioti Sahib.
Assalamo alaikum.
Your misaddressed letter finally reached to us. We would like to confirm here on oath that our mother Mohtarma Muhammadi Begum Sahiba is a muslim by the grace of Allah and believes in his holy prophet Muhammad Sallallaho Alaihe wasallam to be the last of the prophets. She is steadfast on the Muhammadan religion and will continue to believe so for ever inshaAllah. She belongs to the ahlussunnah waljamaat school of thought. She has nothing to do with Mirzaiyyat. We pray that Allah swt keep her on this right path. Please join us in our prayers. WASSALAM.
Muhammad Asif Baig, Muhammad Ashraf Baig,Akbar Baig, Akhtar Sultan.
Note. This letter is in response to your letter and may not be published without permission, we are retaining a copy with us.

Subsequently Molana Mazoor Ahmad sahib met with Akhtar Sultan who was a Section Officer and lived at Govt Quarters Chowburji, Lahore.

Muhammadi Begum died on 19 November, 1966, at Lahore, her funeral prayer was led by Molana Shahabuddin of Chowburji who was a disciple of Shaikhul Hind Molana Mahmoodul Hasan. She was buried in Qabrustan Miyani Sahib Lahore.

The scans





#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam

Mirza Sultan Muhammad from Patti, District Lahore, married Muhammadi Begum (MGA’s niece/daughter), not MGA

Intro
Dear readers, to full understand who Mirza Sultan Muhammad from Patti is, you have to do lots of reading, this is by no means an easy subject to learn.  Nonetheless, start here.  Mirza Sultan Muhammad married MGA’s daughter/niece and MGA also predicted his death within a few years, which never happened.  Ahmadi mullahs went to the extreme of making up fake stories that Mirza Sultan Muhammad repented or apologized, or in some way was neutral in this whole matter.  However, that is a total lie.  Firstly, Mirza Sultan Muhammad served in the British military and even fought during WW-1 (1914–1918).  He was shot and survived and became a hero of sorts.  In the below we sill present lots of info….pay attention.

Ahmadiyya sources lied and told us: these were taken from alislam.org, https://www.alislam.org/library/ahmadiyya-history/prophecy-muhammadi-begum-truth/

“I have always, and still consider the late Mirza Saheb, a righteous and respected person who was a servant of Islam; who had a noble spirit and who was constant in his remembrance of God. I entertain no opposition to his followers and regret that for certain reasons, I was not able to have the honour of meeting him during his lifetime.” [Tashizul Azhan: May 1913]
AND….

“At the time of the prophecy, the Arya Hindus, because of Lekh Ram and the Christians, because of Athim offered me a hundred thousand rupees to file a case against Mirza Saheb. If I had taken the amount I would have become rich but it was my great faith in him that prevented me from doing so.” 

“I declare on oath that I have such firm faith in Hazrat Mirza Saheb which I think even you, who profess to be his followers, cannot claim”
[Al Fazl: 9th June 1921]

We found the original scan of the Al-Fazl of June 9th, 1921

3 years later, Mirza Sultan Muhammad was tracked down and he clarified in the below

The weekly Ahl-i-hadith newspaper of 1924 tells us
Weekly Ahl e Hadis Amritsar in its publication of 24th March, 1924 brought an interesting report in this regard. Urdu version of which may be seen in screen shot of weekly. English translation is as under:-

“”“Mirza Sahib Qadiani ,s each prophesy proved to be a decisive one for him. Because he always prophesied for a decision from Allah. So his prophesy regarding his heavenly wed bride was clear in its meaning but the man to whom the lady was married, was Mirza Sultan Muhammad of Patti, District Lahore. It was all important that Mirza Sahib Qadiani pays attention to him because he was the main irritant in the acquisition of his prophesied bride. Therefore, a stern time line of the death of Mirza Sultan Muhammad was prophesied which was to expire in August 1894. But when he did not die in the given time line, Mirza Qadiani starts saying that my prophesy scared Mirza Sultan which earned him extension in life. Finally Mirza Sahib Qadiani wrote that he would be a liar, if Mirza Sultan did not die in my life time. Facts are that Mirza Sahib Qadiani died in 1908, but Mirza Sultan is still alive. During a debate at Sikandarabad, Qadiani Muballigh Abdur Rehman Desi Misri stated that Mirza Sultan had written a letter to Mirza Sahib Qadiani assuring him that he (Mirza Sultan) considers him a saintly person. Although this writing do not affect the prophesy in any manner, yet Mirza Sultan was asked of this, he verbally replied he has never been a believer of Mirza sb Qadiani. On request he wrote the following text:- When Mirza Qadiani announced my death prophesy I never thought it to be true nor I was scared of it. I have always been and am a follower of my elders of Islam to this day.”””

Signature 
Sultan Muhammad Baig Resident of Patti dated 30-03-1924.
Witnesses
Molvi Abdullah Imam Masjid Mubarak
Molvi Ahmadullah sb Amritsari 
Molvi Mola Bakhsh Khateeb Jama Masjid patti Distt Lahore.
Molvi Abdul Majeed Rasheed Resident of Patti.
Mistari Muhammad Hussain Naqsha Nawees Patti.

The scan

Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi has also confirmed from Mirza Sultan Muhammad thru one of his relative whether he has given Qadianis any such writing in their favour, he denied it

 

In terms of Muhammadi Begum, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was guaranteeing that she would eventually (TAQDIR E MUBRA) be married to him

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad lusted after his niece Muhammadi Begum for his entire life.  Initially, he was giving guarantees that he would end up marrying this innocent girl.  Read other essay’s on this topic here: https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Muhammadi

Summary of these scans

In his book Malfoozat Mirza Qadiani defines categories of TAQDIR (fate) as
“two main types of TAQDIR.

1.TAQDIR E MUALLAQ:- is the fate that is hanging and can be avoided with prayers and SADAQAT (charity).
2.TAQDIR E MUBRAM the fate that is inevitable. It is further divided into two types i.e.:-
(a) GHAIR HAQIQI (Inevitable but unreal) can be avoided or deferred with prayers and Sadaqat.
(b) Taqdir e Mubram Haqiqi . It is so firm and unavoidable that even the collective prayers of 100 prophets can not avoid this.

Now in hIs book Majmua e Ishtiharat Volume 2 page 43, Mirza Ghulam Qadiani writes that happening of Mirza’s Nikah with Muhammadi Begum is the kind of TAQDIR E MUBRAM that can not be avoided (meaning Taqdir e Mubram Haqiqi), because otherwise the words of God would become false. So if she is not married to him, he would be called as a liar in that case.

The scans

 

Even in 1907, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was still lusting for his niece, Muhammadi Begum

Intro
MGA was a sick man.  He lusted after his niece for almost 20 years, we have found what seems to be his final utterance on this topic.  See my other essay https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/01/10/new-data-on-muhammadi-begum-found-2017/

The scan

Summary

When the frustration was at the peak and mirza qadyani could not get married with Mohammadi begum with all his letters to relatives , threats to family and divorces within family ( with her heavenly wife ) as per firm promise of yalash ( god of mirza ) , he said that ” …………..either the Nikkah has been abrogated or has been delayed ”

570 – haqeeqatul wahi .

When MGA died, Nooruddin commented…

 

Now, I would like to remind all the Muslims who have had and still have faith in the Noble Qur’an that since those addressed in it include also their offsprings, successors and those like them, then, can this prophecy not include the daughter, of Ahmad Beg, or the daughter of that daughter ? Does your law of inheritance not apply the regulations regarding daughters to their daughters ? And are the offsprings of the Mirza not his agnates ? I had often told dear Mian Mahmood (Mian Bashiruddin Mahmood, a son of the Mirza and the second head of the Qadiani movement after Hakim Nuruddin. ) that even if the Mirza were to die and this girl did hot enter into his wedlock, my adoration of him would remain unshaken. (Review of Religions, Vol. VII, no. 726, June and July, 1908, p. 279 (cited from Qadiani Mazhab).

The arabic on this page
“””O woman repent repent, calamity (bala) is after you””

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was offering bribes just to get Muhammadi Begum….

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad obsessed over a certain girl, Muhammadi Begum…we have found a quote from Seeratul-Mahdi wherein it is stated that MGA was so desperate to get this girl that he was in talks with the uncle of Muhammadi Begum and offered to bribe him.  See the quote below….this is from the 1888-era….

The scan

English translation
“””Mian Abdullah Sahb sanwari stated to me that once Hazrat Sahab stayed in Jalandhar for a month. In these days a real uncle of Muhammadi Begum tried to fix the marriage of Muhammadi begum with Hazrat Sahab. But he could not succeed. Father of Muhammadi Begum Mirza Ahmad Baig Hushiyar Puri was yet alive in those days and marriage of Muhhadi begum was not fixed to Mirza Sultan Muhammad. This uncle of Muhammadi Begum use come and go in a Tonga and was desirous to get some prize from Hazrat Sahb. As knot of Nikkah of Muhammadi begum was in the hand of this person, therefor Hazrat Sahb has promised to give him some prize. This humble says this person had bad intentions since beginning and wants to have some money from Hazrat Sahb. Because afterwards same man and his few other companions became the reason of marriage of girl at another place. But mother told me that Hazrat sahb kept few concerns in front of him about giving money to them. Mother also told me that elder brother of Muhammadi Begum was also involved in this.”””

Transliteration
“”””Biyan kia muhj say Mian Abdullah Sahb Sanwari ny k aik dafa Hazrat shab Jalandhar ma ja ker aik mah tak thehry thy. In dinoun Muhammadi Begum k Haqeeqi Mamoun ny Muhammadi Begum ka Hazrat Sahb sy rishta kerwa dainy ki koshish ki the. Magar kamyab na hua. Yeh un dinoun ki bat hy jub Muhammadi begum ka walid Mirza Ahmad Baid Hoshiyar Puri zinda tha or Muhammadi Begum ka mirza Sutan Muhammad sy rishta nae hua tha. Muhammadi Begum ka yeh mamoun Jalandhar or Hushiyar pur ma Yakak ma aya jaya kerta tha or Hazrat Sahb sy kuch Inam ka b khawahan tha or choankay Muhammadi Begum k Nikah ka aqad zayada ter isi shakhs k hath ma tha is liya Hazrat Sahb ny is sy kuch Inam ka wada b ker lia tha. Khaksar araz kerta hy k yeh shakhs is muamlay ma bad niyat tha or Hazrat Sahb sy faqat kuch Rupiya urrana chahta tha. Kiun k bad ma yahi shakhs or us k kuch sathi larrki ko doosri jaga bihaya janay ka moojab huy. Magar mujhay walida sahib any batay k Hazrat Sahb ny is ko rypiya dainy k mutailaq ba’az hakeemana ehtiyatain malhooz rakhi huy thein. Walida Sahiba ny yeh b iyan kia k is k sath Muhammadi begum ka barra bhai b shareek tha”””

New data on Muhammadi Begum found (2017)

Intro
One of my close friends in the Ahmadiyya-Awareness team has found an important reference in terms of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his lust after Muhammadi Begum, who was his niece.  Feel free to read the full story here: http://www.irshad.org/qadianism/propheca.php.

Ahmadis lied about the testimony of Muhammadi Begums husband
Ahmadis present this:

Ambala Cantonment
21 March 1913

Dear brother,

Your letter was to hand. Thanks for the remembrance. As for the late Hazrat Mirza sahib marhum, I have always considered him to be, and still consider him to be, a good and righteous man, a servant of Islam, noble-hearted and one who remembers God. With his followers I have no antagonism whatever. Rather, I am very sorry that, due to certain reasons, I could not have the honour of seeing him during his life.

Sultan Muhammad

This letter is a lie
Its a fake, a forgery.  Read their full response here: http://www.muslim.org/allegs/m-begum.htm

In 1894, the husband of Muhammadi Begum said
15940845_948483915286699_2593209221175262467_n

Brief translation and commentary
Its a scan page of “ishat us sunnah” which was lead by Mollana Muhammad Hessian Batalvi. We know Mirza Ghulam has prophesied about death of husband of Muhammadi Begam. It should be done after two and half years from their nikkah in September 1894. But Mirza Ghulam usually fails this prophesy. Then Mirza Ghulam Ahmed responded to people who called him liar by his well known excuse that husband of Muhammadi Begam was frightened from death of Begam’s father so he didn’t die and he repented, later he asked people for an denial of Begam’s husband to his claim if he is lying….Mollana Batalvi write a letter to his one friend Munshi Muhammad Saeed who was living in Rawalpindi and asked him to meet with Begam’s husband to know whether its true that he repented or not?

He met with Sultan Muhammad and asked him about this matter, third question which published in “Ishat us sunnah #6 vol 16 page 196″ (at the end of 1894)was:
What was effect of revelation of Mirza Ghulam on you? Whether you frightened or not?

His answer is:

I used to and still concern Mirza sahib a liar and prevaricator. I am a Muslim and I am very thankful to Allah.”

Transliteration
“Number 3 ma jo Kadiani na Mirza Sultan Ahmad Baig ka dar jana biyan kiya ha, ya mahz kizb ha. Ham na aik dost(Munshi Muhammad Saeed naqsha-novees Rawalpindi) ki marfat Mirza Sultan Muhammad Baig sa bazimn chand sawalat es amr k muthalq sawal kiya to unho na jawab main dar janay sa inkar kiya jo maha sawal zail ma naqal kiya jata ha.
Sawal soom: Mirza Ghulam Ahmed k ilham sa aap’k dil par kiya asar hua tah, kiya aap dar gay tah ya nahi?
Jawab: Mirza sahib ko main jhota or daraghgo janta hun or main Musliman aadmi hun. Khuda ka har waqt shukarguzar hun. Sultan Muhammad Baig-Baqal e khud.
Hazrat nazreen kiya aap jantay hain k dar soorat inkar a khof Mirza Sultan Muhammad Baig sa Kadiani na qasam ka mutalba bawada inaam yak hazar baghait chah-hazar (6000) kiyon nahi kiya jaisa k Abdullah Aatham sa kiya tah? Es ki waja ham sa sunian. Kadiani ko khob yaqeen tah k Sultan Muhammad Musliman, pehr nojawan, pehr Angrazi khawan, pehr police walo ka sobti or muthalq ha. Wo apnay sachay inkar par foran qasam kah kar rupiya wasool karay ga, Aatham ki tarha buddha or zaif ul qalab or esai nahi.”

Commentary
Ahmadis knew that this reference existed, however, they purposely hid for over 100 years.

Even Nooruddin was ashamed of this incident

Now, I would like to remind all the Muslims who have had and still have faith in the Noble Qur’an that since those addressed in it include also their offsprings, successors and those like them, then, can this prophecy not include the daughter, of Ahmad Beg, or the daughter of that daughter ? Does your law of inheritance not apply the regulations regarding daughters to their daughters ? And are the offsprings of the Mirza not his agnates ? I had often told dear Mian Mahmood (Mian Bashiruddin Mahmood, a son of the Mirza and the second head of the Qadiani movement after Hakim Nuruddin. ) that even if the Mirza were to die and this girl did hot enter into his wedlock, my adoration of him would remain unshaken. (Review of Religions, Vol. VII, no. 726, June and July, 1908, p. 279 (cited from Qadiani Mazhab).

Conclusions
Ahmadis have been lying for years and years and years, they are sick and twisted people.

 

 

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad vs. Maulvi Karam Din–Court Case 1903–1905, references from the 2009 edition of Tadhkirah and some other sources

Intro
MGA lost one court case against him in his career.  It is the case of MGA vs. Karam ud Din.  I have collected some bits and pieces of info here.   In January 1903, on behalf of Moulvi Karam Deen of Bheen District Jhelum, and Moulvi Faqeer Mohammad, Editor of Sirajul Akhbaar Jhelum, Hadhrat Sheikh Yaqoob Ali Editor of Al Hakam and Hadhrat Hakeem Fazal-ud-Deen of Bhera who were being sued in connection with a booklet, ‘Saif Chishtian’ by Peer Mehar Ali who was custodian of the Goalrah Shrine.  On Oct-16th, 1903, MGA left Qadian for Gurdaspur (see NOV/DEC-1903—ROR).  MGA and Hakeem Fazal Din lost this case in 1904 (exact date unknown), and were about to be thrown in jail, however, they made bail (700 rupees) and were released.  About a year later, they won on appeal in early 1905.  It was a Judge european Judge named Mr. Hurry, he was the sessions judge of Amritsar.

Related Essay’s and links
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=above+the+law

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/The-Afghan-Martyrs-by-B.A.Rafiq.pdf

https://books.google.com/books?id=zU0TAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA126&lpg=RA1-PA126&dq=Mr.+Hurry+sessions+judge+amritsar&source=bl&ots=b-HwffLt3K&sig=ibucVQ6ZbEaZNeWMfet-uQ6LYSU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwia2ben_dndAhVwIDQIHSTZDe0Q6AEwBHoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=Mr.%20Hurry%20sessions%20judge%20amritsar&f=false

The Criminal Law Journal of India: A Monthly Legal Publication …, Volume 2


Some important references
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)

Pages 570-572
December 6, 1902
(A) Last night I was in such a state that if I had not received Divine revelation, I would have been proved right in thinking that my last moment had arrived. While I was in this condition, I was overtaken by sleep and saw in my dream that I was in a cul-de-sac and three buffaloes (636)
were coming towards me. When one of them approached me I beat it away and the same happened with the second one. Then the third advanced towards me. I felt that it was so
strong that there was no way of deliverance from it. While this was passing through my mind, Allah the Almighty so ordained that it turned away. Taking advantage of this I slipped through brushing against it and began to run. I was thinking that it would be running after me but I did not look back. Then the following Prayer was inspired by Allah the Almighty in a dream upon my heart:

637–Arabic O my Lord everything serves You. So O my Lord, protect me and help me and have mercy on me. [Publishers]

638--al-Hakam, vol. 6, December 10, 1902, p. 10, reports that the Promised Messiahas said:
This prayer is an amulet and protection… I will henceforth make this supplication regularly in my Prayers, and you should also do it.

He also said:

The greatest matter in it, which teaches the True Unity—that is, assures that Allah the Glorious alone can cause any harm or impart any benefit—is that it teaches us that [O Allah] everything is in Your service, and no harmful thing can cause any damage without Your will and permission.

It was conveyed to me that this is the great name of God and that whoever supplicates in these terms would be delivered from every affliction. [al-Badr, vol. 1, no. 7, December 12, 1902, p. 54 and al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 44, December 10, 1902, p. 10].

(B) Of the Signs shown in my favour is one in which God, the All-Knowing and the Wise, informed me about a mean person and his great calumny against me and apprised me through His revelation that this man would attack me in order to humiliate me, but would himself become my target in the end. Allah the Almighty conveyed this to me in the course of three dreams. He disclosed to me in a dream that this enemy of mine would engage three helpers in my opposition to achieve success in his proceedings to dishonour me and to put me to trouble. I was shown in a dream that I was hauled into court like a prisoner but I was shown that I would be delivered in the end, though after an interval. I was also given the good news that the affliction would be reverted upon this lying mean enemy of mine himself.…. Then I began to wait for the developments as indicated in the prophecy. After the passing of a year, all this happened at the instance of Karam Din. (That is, he brought unjustified criminal charges against me).639 [Haqiqatul-Wahi, p. 215, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, p. 225].   

639—This Sign was originally published by the Promised Messiahas in Mawahib-ur Rahman in Arabic and Persian. Later, in Haqiqatul-Wahi, he published the same in Urdu. Our English rendering is based upon the Urdu citation in Haqiqatul-Wahi. [Munawar Ahmed Saeed]
________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 582

January 13, 1903
655—-[Arabic] I shall humiliate him who designs to humiliate you. I shall help him who designs to help you. You have a high standing in My Presence. I have chosen you for Myself and your secret is My secret. You are with Me and I am with you and your secret is My
secret. When you are angry, I am angry and when you love, I also   love. You are to me like My Unity and My Uniqueness. So the time has come when you should be helped and be known among people. Allah praises you from His Throne. Allah praises you and is walking towards you. You have a high standing in My Presence. I have chosen you for Myself and your secret is My secret. You have a standing with Me of which the people have no knowledge. O My
Ahmad, you are My purpose and are with Me. You are with Me and I am with you. Your secret is My secret. When you are angry, I am angry and everyone you love, I love. You have a high standing in My Presence. I have chosen you for Myself. [Publishers].

[Notebook of the Revelations of the Promised Messiahas, p. 1]

He has given me good news and said:

656—[Arabic] I shall not leave a trace of anything which might be designed to humiliate you. [Publishers]

and He said:

657—[Arabic] Allah will safeguard you Himself and He is the Most Gracious Friend. [Publishers]

[Mawahibur-Rahman, p. 17, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 19, p. 235]
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 583-584

January 15, 1903
While in Lahore I received, repeatedly, the revelation: That is [Arabic] I shall show you My blessings from every side.658 [al-Hakam, vol. 7, no. 4, January 31, 1903, p. 15 and al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 1–2, January 23–30, 1903, p. 9].

658-–This prophecy was fulfilled in this wise* that when I approached Jhelum about ten thousand people came to see me. The road was choked with people in all sorts of humble attitudes as if they wanted to prostrate themselves. Then there was such a multitude of people around the District Courts that the Magistrates were greatly surprised. Eleven hundred men and two hundred women made the bai‘at and joined the Jama‘at. Karam Din’s complaint against me was dismissed. Many people made offerings and presented gifts out of good will and humility. Thus we returned to Qadian enriched in every way with God’s blessings and God fulfilled the prophecy very clearly. [Haqiqatul-Wahi, p. 252, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, p. 264].
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 585
January 21, 1903
I saw in my dream that Karam Din had been given some sentence and this was followed by the revelation:

662—[Arabic] That was because they disobeyed and used to transgress. [Publishers]

[Notebook of the Revelations of the Promised Messiahas, p. 2]
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 587
January 24, 1903
(A) Today, in a vision, I was shown the following:

663—[Arabic] A detailed account of that which Allah did in this war after I had published the prophecy among people. [Publishers]

Thereafter my mind moved towards the reception of revelation and I was repeating these very words. This indicates that the prophecy made about the case beforehand would now be fulfilled in detail. [al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 1–2, January 23–30, 1903, p. 7 and al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 5, February 20, 1903, p. 36 and al-Hakam, vol. 7, no. 4, January 31, 1903, p. 15]

(B) I saw in my dream as if I was about to publish an article on the final result of Karam Din’s case against me and I wished to give it this heading:

664–[Arabic] The details of that which Allah did in this war after we had published the prophecy among people. They have drawn away from the water of life, then grind them down a fine grinding. [Publishers]

[Notebook of the Revelations of the Promised Messiahas, p. 3]
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 617
June 29, 1903
I was pondering deeply about the result of the cases which have been filed against me by Karam Din and which some members of my Jama‘at [Community] have filed against him. In this condition, I received the revelation:

714—[Arabic] Verily, Allah is with those who are righteous and those who do good. In this there are Signs for questioners. [Publishers]

I was made to understand that of the two sides God will be with those and will bestow help and victory upon those, who are righteous—that is to say, who do not tell lies, do not wrong anyone, do not calumniate anyone, do not persecute people by cheating, deceiving, and dishonest dealing, and eschew every vice and adhere to truth and justice. And fearing God, they treat His servants with sympathy, goodwill and goodness, and are true wellwishers of mankind. They are not inspired by beastliness, wrongdoing and evil, and are ever ready to behave virtuously towards everyone. The final decision will be in their favour. At that time those who ask: ‘which of the two sides is in the right’ will be shown not one Sign but many Signs. [al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 24, July 3, 1903, p. 189 and al-Hakam, vol. 7, no. 24, June 30, 1903, p. 11].

Also found in the ROR (English of July 1903)See page 288
http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1903/reviewreligionsenglish190307.pdf
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 625

August 18, 1903
[al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 32, August 28, 1903, p. 253 and al-Hakam, vol. 7, no. 31, August 24, 1903, p. 6] Translation: (A) [Arabic] [I shall honour you in a goodly way.] (B) [Arabic] I shall honour you
in a way that will cause people to wonder. (C) [Arabic] The heavens and the earth were closed-up like a bundle and We opened them out, that is, the earth as well as the heavens demonstrated their full powers. (D) [Arabic]

Tell them: It is Allah Who has revealed these words; and then leave them occupied with their
sport. (E) That is [Arabic] They will ask you about your status—what is your honour and
status.731 Say: It is God Who has granted me this status; and then leave them indulging in
idle sport. (F) [Arabic] [No incongruity can you see in the creation of the Gracious One.]
[Haqiqatul-Wahi, pp. 90, 107, 70, 265–266, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, pp. 93, 110, 73, 277–278]

On one occasion when I was in Gurdaspur in connection with a criminal case (that had been instituted against me by Karam Din of Jehlam), I received the revelation: [They will ask you
concerning your status.]… Thereafter when we appeared in court, the other side’s lawyer asked me the same question: Is your rank and status as you have described it in Tiryaqul-Qulub? I answered: Yes, by Allah’s grace that is my status; Allah has Himself bestowed it upon me.
In this manner the revelation which had come to me in the morning was fulfilled about the time of ‘Asr. [Haqiqatul-Wahi, pp. 265–266, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, pp. 277–278]
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 631

September 23, 1903
al-Badr reports that the Promised Messiah[as] narrated the following dream upon rising in the morning:

I had taken up a pen to write. I observed that its point was broken. Thereupon I said: Put on to it one of the nibs that had been sent by Muhammad Afdal. While those nibs were being looked for, I woke up….

If someone would take the time out from worldly occupations and stay with me, he would witness a running river of prophecies being fulfilled like the one of yesterday concerning a pen.740[al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 37, October 2, 1903, p. 390].

740— al-Badr reports that:

After 10 a.m. the case brought by Karam Din against the Promised Messiahas and Hakim Fadl Din was brought up. Khwajah Sahib presented a request on behalf of Hakim Fadl Din that the charges made by Maulavi Karam Din are the same for the investigation of which I have brought a case against Karam Din. Therefore the present case should be postponed till the earlier cases are decided. The lawyers on both side entered into a debate on this issue and the court decided to
postpone the decision to the following day. In the evening the Promised Messiahas received the revelation: [Persian] Be glad and happy. On the 24th the case brought by Sheikh Ya‘qub ‘Ali Editor al- Hakam against Maulavi Karam Din and the Editor of Sirajul-Akhbar of Jehlum was to be heard. But since the testimony of the plaintiff was not available, the case was postponed to October 21, 1903. Since the court had not yet rendered a decision of the discussion of the previous day, Khwajah Sahib wanted to bring up additional legal points. After hearing him, the court decided after 1 p.m. that the plea for postponement be turned down. Thus the words of God, which He
conveyed to His apostle on the 22nd in the evening and which he had narrated on the morning of the 23rd were fulfilled. [al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 37, October 2, 1903, p. 390].
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 632

September 23, 1903
741–
[Persian] Be glad and happy. [Publishers]

[al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 37, October 2, 1903, p. 390]

Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: This revelation was received during the court case of Karam Din.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 670-671

May 1904
(A)805—
[Arabic] We made the iron soft for you. [Persian] We do not approve of any other meaning. [Publishers]

[al-Badr, vol. 3, no. 29, August 1, 1904, p. 4 and al-Hakam, vol. 8, no. 17, May 24, 1904, p. 2]

(B) In the case brought against me by Maulavi Karam Din at Gurdaspur, Karam Din insisted that the word la’im meant bastard and that the word kazzab meant one who always tells lies. The court of first instance accepted his contention. In those days I received the revelation:

806—[Persian] We do not approve of any other meaning. [Publishers]

I understood this as indicating that the interpretation of the first court would not be upheld on appeal; and so it happened. The Divisional Judge rejected all the arguments advanced on behalf of Karam Din and held that la’im and kazzab were appropriate for Karam Din, who was
deserving of even stronger words.[Haqiqatul-Wahi, p. 380, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, p. 394].
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 671

May 1904
807—-[Arabic] We shall put awe in their hearts. [Publishers]

[al-Badr, vol. 3, no. 29, August 1, 1904, p. 4 and al-Hakam, vol. 8, no. 16, May 17, 1904, p. 2]

Footnote—Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: This revelation was received on the return from Gurdaspur where the Promised Messiahas had gone in connection with the case of Karam Din. (See al-Hakam, May 24, 1904, p. 2).
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 677-678

1904
A Maulavi named Karam Din filed some criminal charges against me in Gurdaspur and the maulavis opposed to me appeared as witnesses in the court of Atma Ram, the Extra Assistant Commissioner…. Atma Ram did not pay full attention to the merits and made up his mind to sentence me to imprisonment. Thereupon God conveyed to me that Atma Ram would be afflicted with the deaths of his children. I communicated this vision to the members of my
Jama‘at825. It so happened that within 20 or 25 days he lost two sons. In the end, though he had laid the foundation in his judgment of sentencing me to imprisonment, God held him back from that design, yet he imposed upon me a fine of 700 rupees. I was then honourably acquitted on appeal by the Divisional Judge. But Karam Din’s conviction and sentence were maintained. My fine was remitted but Atma Ram’s sons did not come back…. According to the Divine prophecy which had been published already in my book Mawahibur-Rahman, I was acquitted, my fine was refunded, and the issuing officer’s [Atma Ram’s] order was set aside and he was rebuked for issuing an improper order. But Karam Din (as I had already published in Mawahibur- Rahman) was convicted and punished and the judgment of the court confirmed his being a liar. [Haqiqatul-Wahi, pp. 121–122, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, pp. 124–125].

825—Note by Maulana Abdul Latif Bahawalpuri: Qadi Muhammad Yusuf, Amir Jama‘at Ahmadiyyah, Frontier Province writes in his book Sawanih Zuhur-e-Ahmad Ma‘ud:

The Promised Messiahas saw in a dream that a lion has taken away both sons of Atma Ram. At the same time as the Promised Messiahas narrated this dream, Atma Ram received a telegram that his son is suffering from plague. Two sons of his died one after the other with plague. [Zuhur-e-Ahmad Mau‘ud, pp. 51–52].  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 1048

Sheikh Khair-ud-Din 1261 narrated that: When the case of Karam Din was pending before Chandu Lal Magistrate, the Promised Messiahas said: I do not see Chandu Lal1262 occupying the Magistrate’s chair.[al-Hakam, vol, no. 38, no. 25, July 14, 1935, p. 4 and Register Riwayat-e-Sahabah, vol. 9, pp. 58–59]

1261–Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: He was from Ludhiana and was a cobbler by profession. He used to make shoes for the Promised Messiahas. He stated that he stayed with the Promised Messiahas in Gurdaspur during Karam Din’s trial.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 1049

October 7, 1904
Chaudhry Muhammad ‘Ali Khan Ashraf Head Master Bairam Pur narrated that:

The Promised Messiahas said at the time of ‘Asr Prayer one day before judgment was to be delivered in the case of Karam Din… that he had seen in his dream that he was returning home riding a white horse and his wife said (something like): We have suffered a loss (probably of money). The Promised Messiahas said to her: That does not matter as I have returned safe.

The Promised Messiahas interpreted the dream that the Magistrate (who was a bigoted Arya, and was bent upon giving the decision against the Promised Messiah) would sentence him to a fine, but nothing more. However, on appeal he would be acquitted and would thus be made
secure against the mischief of the Magistrate. That is exactly what happened the next day; he was sentenced to a fine, which was immediately paid … and on appeal [he was acquitted and] the fine was remitted.[al-Hakam, vol. 38, no. 3, January 28, 1935, p. 4].
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 1050

October 8, 1904
Shukar Ilahi of Nabi Pur District Gurdaspur narrates that: On the (day) on which judgment in the case of Karam Din was to be announced… the Promised Messiahas was walking… under the trees at the time of ‘Asr.… He stopped suddenly from walking and said something to Maulavi Sahib [Nur-ud-Din]. At that time the case was called and when we returned to the shed, the Promised Messiahas said to Maulavi Sahib [Nur-ud-Din]: I have seen in a vision that
my handkerchief had fallen in a pool of water but was recovered. He interpreted this as meaning that he would be sentenced to a fine which would be remitted. And that is what happened.[Register Riwayat-e-Sahabah, vol. 3, p. 114]
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Tadhkirah (2009 online edition)
Page 1050-1051

October 10, 1904
Miyan Allah Yar Contractor of Batala narrates through Maulavi Ghulam Nabi Misri that:
At the end of the case in Gurdaspur, when the Promised Messiahas was about to leave for Batala for the return journey to Qadian, he received a vision or a revelation:

[Urdu] The route via Batala is dangerous.

The Promised Messiahas asked for the carriages to be brought, and three of them were brought. (He changed his route and commenced the journey.) He explained the reason for the change of route. In the meantime a rath (bullock chariot) had been sent from Qadian to Batala to meet him. Instead of the Promised Messiahas some of his companions including Sheikh Ya‘qub ‘Ali, travelled in it. When they arrived at the canal bridge, they found that some of the opponents from Massanian and Batala were pretending to hold a meeting. They had conspired to waylay the Promised Messiahas at the bridge and throw him into the canal. ….When the chariot approached the bridge it was surrounded by the crowd of opponents… and there was
a skirmish… but when they discovered that the Promised Messiahas was not in the chariot, they apologised for the assault. [Register Riwayat-e-Sahabah, vol. 10, pp. 280–281].
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Hidden Treasures–https://www.alislam.org/library/book/hidden-treasures-of-islam/

Pages 343–346
Summary written by Syed Hasanat Ahmad (2010)

The publication of the book had an instant impact. It published a prophecy of the Promised Messiahas about Maulavi Karam Din. The book was published on January 15, 1903, by special efforts of the press workers in Qadian and carried the news that Maulavi Karam Din would attempt to involve the Promised Messiahas in criminal cases and the Promised Messiahas was divinely informed that he would be honourably acquitted from these cases. The publication had to be completed before that date as Maulavi Karam Din had already moved the Extra Assistant Commissioner of Jhelum to issue warrant of arrest of the Promised Messiahas under Section 500, 501 and 502 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the date of hearing was fixed on January 17, 1903. The issuance of warrant of arrest provided yet another occasion to opponents to raise an uproar against the Promised Messiahas and they were clamouring a severe punishment for him. The trip from Qadian to Jhelum became historic in several ways. Giving details of the journey in a later publication (Haqiqatul-Wahi), the

Promised Messiahas said:

When I was on my way to Jhelum in connection with a case filed by Maulavi Karam Din, I had a revelation: “I (God) will shower blessings upon you from all directions.” I related the revelation to the people of my Jama‘at and this revelation came true in this manner that, when I reached Jhelum, about ten thousand people came to see me and most of them had lined up on the roads. Such a crowd had assembled in the court that it had amazed the authorities. About
eleven hundred people came to me for bai‘at and about two hundred of them were women. The case filed by Maulavi Karam Din was dismissed and a large number of people made offerings in cash and kinds to show their regard and respect for me. And this was how I was showered with the Divine blessings and returned to Qadian victoriously. (Haqiqatul-Wahi, p. 252, Sign No. 101, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 22, pp. 263-264).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Taken from Hidden Treasures--https://www.alislam.org/library/book/hidden-treasures-of-islam/

Page 126
Summary written by Syed Hasanat Ahmad (2010)

Padre ‘Imad-ud-Din, a native convert from Islam, was a paid servant of the Christians for a long time. He had already made himself notorious by his rabid and scurrilous attacks upon the Holy Founder of Islam. His books Tarikh-e-Muhammadi and Hidayatul-Muslimin had inflicted deep wounds upon religious susceptibilities of the Muslims. Even the Ra’i Hind and Prakash of Amritsar had protested against his bitter attacks. Another Hindu paper, Aftab-e- Punjab had
also condemned his writings. Muslims exposed this paid preacher of Christians in a book entitled ‘Uqubatud Dallin. Even the organ of the American Mission, Shamsul Akhbar of Lucknow had admitted the abusive nature of Padre ‘Imad-ud-Din and his colleagues Maulavi
Karam Din, Nizamud Din, Ilahi Bakhsh, Hamidullah Khan, etc., who were called Maulavis and learned men to deceive the public. The Promised Messiahas offered five thousand rupees as a reward if they could jointly produce a book like the one entitled Nurul-Haqq (Life of
Ahmad by A.R. Dardra, edition of 2008, pp. 412-413).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Life of Ahmad by A.R. Dardra, edition of 2008, page 564.
Footnote 135

Ahmadas had felt the need of a press at Qadian as early as 1892. An Ishtihar was issued and a fund was opened for this purpose; but, it appears satisfactory arrangements could not be made at that time. Sh. Nur Ahmadra brought his press, Riyad-e-Hind, from Amritsar and A’ina Kamalat-e-Islam was then printed at Qadian. After that Hakim Fadal Dinra started a press at
Qadian in 1895. It was named Diya’ul Islam. This press produced Ahmad’sas publications at cost price (Ahmad’sas statement in Karam Din’s case, Section 420. I.P.C. dated. 19.8.1903). It was for this reason that Ahmadas produced, on 15.8.1898 a detailed account of this press in the income tax case. (See statement of Hakim Fadl Din in Karam Din’s case on 20.7.1903).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Nubuwwat & Khilafat
(Prophethood & its Successorship), Four Speeches Delivered on June 10, 1966 Under the Chairmanship of Hadrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih III (may Allah shower His mercy upon him) at Masjid Mubarak Rabwah, Pakistan.—-https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Nubuwwat-and-Khilafat.pdf

Pages 17-18

Statements Under Oath of Maulavi Muhammad ‘Ali in the Court

14) a. In the presence of Promised Messiahas, Maulavi Muhammad ‘Ali appeared as a witness on May 13, 1904. On being questioned by Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din he said:

Anyone who denies the truthfulness of a Prophet is a great liar. Mirza Sahib has claimed to be a Nabi. His followers believe him to be true in this claim and his opponents consider him false. The Holy Prophetsa is true according to Muslims and false according to the Christians.

b. On June 16, 1904, in the presence of the Promised Messiahas, in response to the critique made by Maulavi Karam Din, Maulavi Muhammad ‘Ali said:

Mirza Sahib makes a claim of nubuwwat in his writings. The purport of his claim is that, “I am a Nabi but I have brought no new shari‘ah.” According to the Holy Qur’an anyone who treats such a true claimant as a liar is a great liar. (Court Proceedings, p. 362).

16) In the case of Maulavi Karam Din of Bhaiñ [District Jehlum], acting as attorneys, Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din and Maulavi Muhammad ‘Ali, submitted the following statement under the signature of the Promised Messiahas:

There is another view of the matter according to Mohamedan theology. One who belies a person claiming to be a Prophet is a kadhdhab [great liar] and this has been admitted by prosecution evidence. Now the complainant knew perfectly well that the first accused claimed that position and, notwithstanding that, he belied the accused. Consequently in religious terminology the complainant was a kadhdhab. (Proceedings Gurdaspur Court, p. 194).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Taken from Hidden Treasureshttps://www.alislam.org/library/book/hidden-treasures-of-islam/

Page 314-315
Summary written by Syed Hasanat Ahmad (2010)

Explaining the use of relevant quotes from other authorities, the Promised Messiahas stated that these quotes do not constitute plagiarism, otherwise everyone will be exposed to this charge. It so happened that Mian Shahabuddin and Maulavi Karam Din in their correspondence with the Promised Messiahas mentioned that most of the material appearing in Saif-e-Chishtiya’i written by Pir Mehar ‘Ali Shah is copied word by word from the notes of Maulavi Muhammad Hasan Faidi and these notes were written by him on the margins of the books I‘jazul-Masih and Shamse Bazighah and these books carrying marginal notes were bought. This is how the devious Pir was exposed who made the allegations that the Promised Messiahas had plagiarized whereas the same charge recoiled on him.

The Promised Messiahas also replied to criticism that Pir Mehar ‘Ali Shah made in his book, Saif-e-Chishtiya’i about the merit of the I‘jazul-Masih. The Promised Messiahas also established that the revelation made to him were revelation of high order. The Pir also made an allegation that the Promised Messiahas had been plagiarizing from Maqamat-e-Hariri but what actually transpired was that Pir Mehar ‘Ali Shah had himself plagiarized from the notes of Maulavi
Muhammad Hasan Faidi which the Maulavi had written marginally on the I‘jazul-Masih and Shamse Bazighah by Hadrat Maulavi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi. This information was given by Mian Shahabuddin and Maulavi Karam Din in their letters to the Promised Messiahas. This whole correspondence has also been published in this book.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Lecture Ludhiana, pages 31-32

“””Then another case was filed against me in the court of Mr. Dowie, and was followed by yet another concerning income tax. By the grace of God, my innocence was established in all of them. Then came Karam Din’s case in which every effort was made against me and it was
assumed that the case would sound the death knell of this Jama‘at. Indeed, had the Jama‘at not been from God and had He not sustained and strengthened it, it would no doubt have been wiped out. People from one end of the country to the other lent their support to Karam Din. He
was aided and abetted in every way, so much so that some of the prosecution witnesses, despite their claim to beingreligious divines, testified to what was totally false. They went to the extent of alleging that despite being an adulterer, a transgressor and a libertine, I dared claim to be righteous. The case dragged on for a long time. During this period a number of heavenly signs appeared. At long last, the judgement was announced by the magistrate, who happened to be a Hindu, imposing a fine of five hundred rupees on me. But God had already informed me:

“The Superior Court acquits.”

Therefore, when the appeal was filed in the court of the Divisional Judge, he, in his God-given shrewdness, at once got to the bottom of the case and noted in the judgement that whatever I had written about Karam Din was absolutely correct and I had full right to do so. The judgement he passed has since been published. In the end, he acquitted me of the charge and ordered the refund of the fine. He also censured the trial court for letting the case linger so long.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s poetry vs. Karam Din
See Durr-e-Sameen.  https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Durr-e-Sameen-English-Translation.pdf.  Pages 86 and 94

Page 86
Is it not strange that while you are His beloved,
The entire affairs are being carried out to my favour?
Then not only this that it has happened once, I see the bounties of God at each step.
Look at that man from Bheen whose named Karam Din,
Who even sacrificed his sleep for the sake of conflict,
For whose help there was fervour among the people and
Whose weaknesses were hidden by every enemy of truth,
Whose friend was every aggressor and strayed person,
For whose help came the Muslim clerics, (210)

Page 94
What a strange thingHe helps a disbeliever
That God Who was supposed to befriend the believers.
In your eyes, even Karam Din was one of the pious ones
Who aggressively attacked mefor no reason.
I was not without supportGod’s help was with me
God’s revelation repeatedly gave glad tiding of victory.
But he did not see mehis eyes were closed
Then, after retribution, he decked himself with eye salve.
In the offices123, his name still remains as a liar
Now he can’t erase this name until the Day of Counting. (130)
____________________________________________________________________________________________
From the Review of Religions–Jan 1903, (english version)

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR190301.pdf#page=39

MGA gives lots of revelations claiming that his enemies will be defeated.  MGA also claimed to have seen Gabriel for the first time ever.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
From the Review of Religions–Jan 1905, (english version)

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR190501.pdf#page=39

End of Cases vs. MGA

see pages 39-40

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Who is Mirza Bashir Ahmad, the younger brother of Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad?

Intro
Mirza Bashir Ahmad was a son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad who was named Qamrul Anbiyaa (the moon of the prophets) by his father. He was born in 1893 and died on September 2, 1963, at the age of 71. He helped his brother throught the latter’s period as head of the Qadiani Ahmadiyya. This help came in the form of managing properties in Qadian and writing books and essays in the jamaat periodicals that ultimately proved to be quite controversial.  His role and his works are now greatly minimized by the Qadiani establishment. Very few Ahmadis know know much about him and his writings.

His marriage in 1902
His marriage was a child marriage, he was married to the daughter of Maulvi Ghulam Hasan Khan (who became a Lahori Ahmadi in 1914, and even refused to give his bait to the Khalifa, Noorudin) when he was only 9 years old: In 1902, the Promised Messiah asked for the hand of Maulana Ghulam Hassan Khan Niazi’s second daughter, Sarwar Sultan, for marriage with his son Mirza Mian Bashir Ahmad. The nikah was solemnized on September 12, 1902 and the nikah was conducted by Hakeem Nooruddin, who also delivered the khutba-e-nikah (marriage sermon).  (Al-Hakm of 17 September 1902, 31 October 1902 and 17 November 1902. The full text of the khutba is also published in Khutbat-e-Nur(pp. 102-109). (The late Mirza Muzaffar Ahmad CSP, who had retired from the Civil Service of Pakistan and was residing in Washington, D.C. at the time of his death, is the son of Mirza Bashir Ahmad and Sarwar Sultan.  (http://aaiil.org/text/articles/hope/2009/hope200905_lifesketchghulamhassankhanniazi.pdf)

His nickname during the life of MGA
MGA called him the Qamrul Anbiyaa (Moon of the Prophets) allegedly told to him directly by God. It is meant to signify that all the light of all the prophets is reflected in him.

MGA’s death
Mirza Bashir Ahmad wrote about the death of MGA 20+ years after it happened.  He wrote to purposely chance the narrative that MGA died of cholera, since that was the main narrative that everyone in British India knew.

The children of Mirza Bashir Ahmad?
Ahmadiyya sources don’t really explain this at all.  Nevertheless, one of his sons is the famous Mirza Muzaffar Ahmad (MM Ahmad).  He was born in 1913.  We have to come to find out that he had 8 children in total, 5 boys and 4 girls.  There whereabouts are unknown by 2018 (see at the 4:45 mark).  He doesn’t seem to have taken a second wife either.

He had 5 sons
1.  Mirza Muzzafar Ahmad (born 1913)
2.  Mirza Hamid Ahmad also spelled as Mirza Hameed Ahmad
3.  Mirza Munir Ahmad, also spelled as Mirza Muneer Ahmad.
———————–grandson-Mirza Safeer Ahmad, was married to the eldest daughter of Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Shaukat, his first cousin.  
4.  Dr. Brigadier Mirza Mubasher Ahmad
5.  Mirza Mujeed Ahmad passed away on 14 August 2018 at the age of 94.  Was born in Qadian on 18 July 1924.  He dedicated his life to the service of faith on 7 May 1944 and continued his studies. In 1949 he joined Jamiatul Mubashireen and graduated in July 1954.  He was married on 28 December 1950, which was the third day of the Jalsa Salana, to Sahibzadi Qudsiyah Begum Sahiba – daughter of Hazrat Nawab Abdullah Khan Sahibra and Hazrat Nawab Amatul Hafeez Begum Sahiba

Daughters?
So far they are unknown.

1910
8 years later (1910) later he matriculated, or he graduated from high school. He was 17. After 7 more years of college he graduated with an M.A. in Arabic. Yet he never wrote anything in Arabic in his whole life, in fact it is unclear what institution gave him a Masters of Arabic.

Such a lofty title does not equate with the reduced importance that the Qadiani Ahmadiyya give to him now.  In another article in the Review of Religions, circa 1918, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad himself has been referred to as the ‘sun’ and the ‘moon’ of the prophets, together with an explanation of why it is so.

1913
MM Ahmad was born.

June 1914, he writes an essay in the english ROR
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/21/in-1914-mirza-bashir-ahmad-simply-called-mga-a-mujadid-not-a-prophet/

1916
His first few article in jamaat newspapers began in late 1914 and they continued for many years.  His jamaat took his essays and articles and put them into book form.  The first such book was “Kalimatul Fasl” which started as a series of essays and was officially put into book form.  This book focused on issues between the Lahori-Ahmadi’s and Qadiani-Ahmadi’s.  Those issues included Takfir, prophethood, and whether Ahmadi’s followed the same Kalima as Muslims or not.

1919
He began writing about the life of Muhammad (saw).  His articles appeared again in Ahmadiyya periodicals.  Those articles were edited and turned into books.  This book is now in english on the Qadiani-Ahmadi website.  Its called, “The Life of the Seal of the Prophets“.  There are 3 volumes.  We are not sure how much editing was done, that still needs to be explore.  However, in this era, the Mirza family was calling child marriage as normal.

1923
He writes the first edition of ‘Seeratul-Mahdi”, in english as “The Life of the Mahdi”.  Many editions come after, with heavy edits along the way.  The first edition is still missing, it is said to have many controversial personal details of MGA and especially his lust for his niece, Muhammadi Begum.

He begins editing the works of MGA and other Ahmadi authors

He gets MGA’s date of birth pushed back to 1835
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-lies-about-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

1934—the Bihar Earthquake
He wrote a book entitled “Another Great Prophecy Fulfilled” wherein he claims that the 1934 earthquake in India was predicted by MGA.

1935
He writes, “Islam and Slavery”–https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Islam-and-Slavery.pdf

1940
Mirza Bashir Ahmad beefs with Muhammad Ali (lahori-ahmadi) on the topic of funeral prayers for Non-Ahmadis.

1947
He moved to Lahore, Pakistan with his brother, the Khalifa, he then moved to Rabwah, once housing arrangements were made.

1959
He writes that the Ahmadiyya system of Khilafat won’t last forever, he also writes that Ahmadi’s can physically kill other Ahmadi’s if that situation ever arises.  He was talking about the wars between India and Pakistan and he knew that there were Ahmadi’s in heavy numbers in both military’s.

“The khilafat in the Jama‘at will not remain in its pure form forever, but will degenerate into a hereditary institution after the first four khalifas. Apparently, Mirza Bashir Ahmad drew a parallel with the history of the early khalifas of Islam, when after the first four khalifas, who were truly worthy of holding this office, the headship deteriorated into a worldly monarchy in which succession was by descent, and not by the true Islamic worth of a person.” (Translation and quotation directly to the statement of Zahid Aziz, who is a Lahori-Ahmadi top scholar).

1960
His speech at the Ahmadiyya Jalsa in 1959 is turned into a book called “The Life of the Good”, in Urdu its called “Seerat-e-Tayyiba”.

1962
He writes “Islam and Communism”.

His books, not in any order

1- Seerat Khatamun Nabiyeen (The Life of The Seal of Prophets) [1]

2- Seeratul Mahdi Vol-1 (The Life of the Mahdi Vol-1))[2]

3- Seeratul Mahdi Vol-2 (The Life of the Mahdi vol-2)[3]

4- Silsila Ahmadiyya (The History of The Ahmadiyya Community) [4]

5- Alhujjatul Baligha (The Perfect Proof) [5]

6- Tabligh-e-Hadayat (The Preaching of Guidance) [6]

7- Hamara Khuda (Our God) [7]

8- Kalima-tul-Fasal (The Decisive Word) [8]

9- Khatm-e-Nabuwwat-Ki-Haqeeqat (Truth of the Finality of Prophethood) [9]

10- Chalees Jawahir Pare (Forty Gems) [10]

 

Related Essays and links
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/08/who-is-maulana-ghulam-hasan-khan-niazi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/14/ahmadis-are-hypothetically-allowed-to-kill-other-ahmadis/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=cholera

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/01/kalimatal-fasl-by-mirza-bashir-ahmad-1916/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/06/27/do-ahmadis-believe-in-the-same-kalima-as-muslims/

https://www.alislam.org/library/book/life-character-seal-prophets-vol-1/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/01/mirza-bashir-ahmad-a-son-of-mga-wrote-in-1920-that-aisha-was-7-years-old-when-she-married-muhammad-saw/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/13/mirza-bashir-ahmad-did-takfir-on-all-muslims-and-lahori-ahmadis-1916/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Islam-and-Slavery.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/17/seeratul-mahdis-1st-edition-is-missing-it-was-published-on-dec-10th-1923/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=edit

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/07/12/ahmadiyy-and-2455-of-the-quran-and-their-spiritual-khilafat/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/17/a-glimpse-of-mirza-sahibs-life-from-the-infamous-seeratul-mahdi-shocking/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/08/25/truth-about-khatm-e-nabuwat-by-mirza-bashir-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/18/mirza-bashir-ahmad-va-muhammad-ali-1940-41-on-the-topic-of-funeral-prayers-for-non-ahmadi-muslims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/21/in-1914-mirza-bashir-ahmad-simply-called-mga-a-mujadid-not-a-prophet/

http://www.alhakam.org/sahibzada-mirza-majeed-ahmad-sahib

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Mirza+Muzzafar+Ahmad

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Seerat-i-Tayyaba.pdf

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Another-Great-Prophecy-Fulfilled.pdf

Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Up ↑