Search results

"Qasim "

“Khilafat-i-Mahmud” by Mir Qasim Ali

Mir Qasim Ali seems to have been very involved with defending the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s after the split of 1914.  He seems to have written a few books, one of them is “Khilafat-i-Mahmud”, in english it would be, “The Khilafat of Mahmud”, he wrote another book, “Muslih Maud”, in english it would be “The Promised Reformer”. These books were quoted in 1966 by Qazi Muhammad Nazeer, as the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s responded to the criticisms of the Lahori-Ahmadi’s, specifically by Mumtaz Ahmad Faruqi. Mir Qasim Ali wrote a book in 1931 about Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, called “Batlvi Ka Anjaam”, in english it would be “The End of Batalvi”. 7 October 1915:  Mir Qasim Alira started publication of his newspaper Al Faruq from Qadian. This powerful medium of tabligh continued rendering its services untill the sad demise of Hazrat Mir Sahibra in April 1942. In January 1911: Hazrat Mir Qasim Alira launched a new magazine called Risala Ahmadiyya. The magazine was in response to allegations raised against the Jamaat by opponents such as Maulvi Sanaulllah of Amritsar and Maulvi Ibrahim of Sialkot.

See “Truth Prevails” by 
Qazi Mohammad Nazir Lyallpuri, published on October 4, 1966, see the online english edition.

“””Would it not mean, that the agency to turn three centuries into four would be the fourth century, not the person of the Muslihil Mau’ud. Suppose the Muslih Mau’ud is not born in the fourth century; the fourth century, even then, would turn the third century into the fourth century or would it not? After the first century of any era has passed, does not the new century turn the first century into the second century? And does not the next century turn the period into the third century? Every one in his proper senses would perceive that the second century of any era turns the first century into the second century; similarly the third century turns the second one into the third century, and the fourth century would turn the third century into the fourth. No human being can turn the first, or second, or third century into the second, or third, or fourth century, quite irrespective of whether the Muslih Mau’ud had been born, or not. Only the fourth century would be able to turn the third century into the fourth century. This cannot be done by any kind of Muslih Mau’ud.”””” (Khilafat-i-Mahmud, page 40). 

“”””“The person of the Muslih Mau’ud can form no bar against the advent of the fourth century. If you say that the Muslih Mau’ud would be born at the end of the day of the third century, and at the earliest commencement of the night between the third and fourth century, even then it would not be said, in human parlance, that the person born at this particular time, had turned the third century into the fourth. 1) Because this statement would be just a statement that he would be born on that particular day. There is no argument or reason to establish it. 2) Let us assume that this can happen, and it has actually taken place, even then the person of the Muslih Mau’ud will not turn the third century into the fourth, just as in the case of the first and second centuries there was no human-being to turn the first century into the second and second into the third. What turns one century into the second and the third or fourth century, is the passage of the required measure of time, nothing else. In the same way, what turns the third century into the fourth is the rolling of the days and nights, nothing else.”””” (Khilafat-i-Mahmud, page 40). 

Links and Related Essays

Truth Prevails

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Danielle Davis vs. Qasim Rashid, Virginia’s 28th District Senate Election vs. Senator Richard Stuart

Qasim Rashid’s run at the Virginia senate has been excruciating to watch.  Qasim is obviously running per the order of his Khalifa, Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Ahmadi’s can’t run for public office without prior approval.  Mirza Masroor Ahmad wants more political control and involvement from Ahmadi’s and has thus launched his best candidate.  Qasim is going up against Richard Stuart.

The letter

LETTER: Rashid’s strategy is to denigrate his opponent

I have known state Sen. Richard Stuart for a long time. Over the last two weeks, he has been accused of being racist, Islamophobic, xenophobic, and any other adjective Rashid’s supporters can conjure up to gain political leverage.

Let’s clear things up, shall we? First and foremost, there is NO basis for these accusations. Stuart’s record as a U.S. Marine, state senator and prosecutor give absolutely no indication he is guilty of these false and nasty claims of which he has been accused.

Secondly, Mr. Stuart’s campaign called into question a tweet Mr. Rashid posted in 2018. These are not the words of Senator Stuart, but his opponent, Mr. Rashid!

If you want to talk about stoking fear, we should discuss Mr. Rashid’s past tweet stating that he believes the United States military is responsible for terrorism.

Sadly, it is very clear that Mr. Rashid’s only campaign strategy is to denigrate his opponent any way he can while sidestepping the crucial issues that affect the 28th District.

I urge the individuals who have accused Mr. Stuart of stoking fear over the last few weeks to look into the infinite Twitter history of their candidate, Mr. Rashid.””””””

Danielle Davis


Links and Related Essays

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #virginia #virginiasenate #virginias28thdistrict

Qasim Rashid is getting out of state funding for his campaign, Virginia’s 28th district

Dear readers, no Ahmadi can ever run for political office without the approval of their Khalifa.  Sometimes its official approval and sometimes its behind the scenes approval.  For example, Muhammad Zafrullah Khan came out of nowhere in the 1930’s and became an executive on the Queens council, this is an example of a behind the scenes push.  In 1976, in Pakistan, an Ahmadi tried to run for political office, using Ahmadi rights, he did this without the approval of the Khalifa, the Khalifa quickly kicked him out of Ahmadiyya. Qasim Rashid is a super trusted Ahmadi, he is the son of an Ahmadi mullah, who still works for the Ahmadiyya Movement in Canada.

Richard Henry Stuart, Sr. aka Richard Stuart (Republican) vs. Qasim Rashid
Qasim Rashid recently reported on his Facebook page how his opponent, the incumbent, Richard Stuart proved how Qasim Rashid was using donors outside of Virginia as a means of funding.  In typical Ahmadi fashion, Qasim never admitted to any of it in his recent essay.  Instead, he accused Richard Stuart of having corporations, who’s headquarters are out of state as a means of funding.  However, this is a normal business process.  Google has its headquarters in California, however, it funds politicians all over America and has the right to do so.

Who are Qasim Rashid’s out of state funders?
In Qasim’s essay, he admitted that he does have out of state funding, however, he wouldn’t elaborate as to who the donors are.  Are they Ahmadi’s?  Are Ahmadi’s supporting Qasim Rashid all around America?

Links and Related Essays,_Virginia_Senator

#virginia #virginiasenate #virginias28thdistrict #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Sialkot #Mosqueattack


Qasim Rashid has been ordered by his Khalifa to run for Congress

All Ahmadiyya politicians are controlled by the Mirza family.  This goes back to Zafrullah Khan and his work with the British government, he was the Ahmadi representative to the British government.  After 1947, he was arrogant and kept going to and supporting Ahmadiyya Jalsa’s and Ijtema’s in Pakistan even after being told to stop by his cabinet.  Furthermore, in 1976, an ahmadi was kicked out of the Ahmadiyya movement when he tried to run for political office in Pakistan.  In 2019, Qasim Rashid is the new face of Ahmadiyya politics in America.  He is running for District 28, the Virginia Senate.  This has been a republican-owned district since 1983.

What about the Ahmadiyya Communities view on women and working?  
What will Qasim Rashid say when questioned about the Ahmadiyya movement and their strict standards on women?

Links and Related Essays


#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Qasim Rashid confronted by Jesse Lee, a conservative Christian

Qasim Rashid and other Ahmadi’s are running around social media unchecked, they lie and give bogus information all the time.  Qasim Rashid lies about every single topic in this interview.  Qasim Rashid lies about Muslims and lying.  Muslims did lie, just like the USA lies to Russia and the world.  This is how governments talk to each other and the etc.  The Quran only talks about during peace time and between Muslims.  Qasim Rashid is also called socialist, which he is, however, he denies it.

The video

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Ali Rizvi mentions the lies of Qasim Rashid in his book, in terms of Takfir from Ahmadis to Muslims


The lies of Ahmadi people continue day by day.  Ahmadi’s dont care, they are loyal to the Mirza family and gladly lie on their behalf.  I recently came across an ex-Ahmadi’s video on the subject of Takfir and Ahmadiyya and felt moved to post it.  In this video, the famous ex-Muslim, Ali Rizvi’s book “The Atheist Muslim”, is discussed, in his book Ali Rizvi mentioned his exchange with Qasim Rashid, and in terms of a specific quotation from MGA, wherein MGA clearly called all Muslims that reject him as non-Muslim.

Qasim Rashid initially authenticated the quote
Most people havent done the extant of research as me and my team, as a result, as they engage Ahmadis, they only have a few quotes, whereas I have a full catalog of supporting references in this case.  In fact see here:

My team
My team an I have collected more research data on Ahmadiyya then any other source on the internet, and we continue to work, in fact, when MGA did his Takfir in 1906, with Dr. Abdul Hakeem Khan, most of the writings from Dr. Khan were never revealed, however, my team and I have found them and posted them here:

Qasim Rashid then denied the quote altogether and called it a clerical error
Ahmadis get away with this type of behavior, since in this case, Ali Rizvi didnt have the supporting quotes.  In 1911, Mahmud Ahmad, the soon to be Khalifa, he quoted MGA as saying exactly what we know he said, i.e., all Muslims who reject MGA are non-Muslims.  Further, the Lahori-Ahmadis cited this quote vs. the Qadianis almost 10 times from 1914 to 1965, further, in 1935, the Al-Fazl newspaper (the official organ of Ahmadiyya), quoted it again.  Then, the 2004 edition of Tadhkirah also had the quote, it was only in 2009, when a new edition of Tadhkirah was published, thats when they removed the quote.

Enjoy the video!!!!


Links and Related Essays


Al Hakam – 6 September 2019

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #Ahmadiyyatakfir #takfir


Shia “Imam Tawhidi” goading Qasim Rashid by pointing out MGA’s writings on Christianity being the “perfect manifestation of Satan”

I found this entire essay on reddit.

See here:

So this tweet happened:

If you follow the thread, you’ll see some comments from Ahmadis chiming in about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad clarifying numerous times he’s not suggesting anyone kill or cause physical harm of any kind, to Christians. Instead, he’s using the word “demolish” to talk about defeating an ideology so convincingly, no serious person takes it seriously. This much I’ll defend MGA’s statement.

However, what’s lost in that thread, is that coming out to say that Christianity is the “perfect manifestation of Satan” is quite over the top.

As is usual with Ahmadiyya Islamic apologetics, there’s a long convoluted reasoning and argumentation process that builds up to that. However, it is also true that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was personally focused and troubled by Christianity gaining a foothold in 19th century India–often pummeling Islam in books, magazines, and other discourse.

Much of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s writings on Christianity seem to come from a place of, “if you can make fun of my religion, I’ll ridicule yours”.

On the one hand, this doesn’t seem very messiah-like. We can disagree with Christianity without having to resort to hyperbole.

On the other hand, Islamic prophecy about the Latter Days “messiah” talks about “breaking the cross” and “killing the swine”. There are all kinds of apocalyptic end times imagery present in the hadith that orthodox Muslims wanted MGA to fulfill before they followed him. For Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to suggest he is a peaceful messiah andstill fulfill this mission/role, he has to come across as “destroying” Christianity intellectually.

Statements like those shown in Imam Tawhidi’s tweet of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s writings don’t help Mirza Ghulam Ahmad come across as reasonable or even rational.

Ahmadis are now working on discrediting the Imam

Most Ahmadis hated Nabeel, and avoided his invitations to debate, even Qasim Rashid

As we all know, Ahmadis are taught to hate their critics and pray for their deaths, and in stupendous fashion.  Ahmadis hated Lekh Ram, and Abdullah Athim, and Dowie, and Piggot, and Maulvi Sanaullah and many many others.  Mirza Ghulam Ahmad prayed for the death of over 100 critics, and celebrated when any of them died.  Moreover, the vicious Ahmadi mullahs have brainwashed Ahmadis to hate all ex-ahmadis (like me) and to pray for their untimely death.

Nabeel Qureshi invited Qasim Rashid to debate
In the below, I have posted tweets wherein Qasim Rashid made some disparaging and rather rude remarks towards Nabeel…

Other Ahmadis tweeting vs. Nabeel

A new Ahmadi, Abid Mirza, makes a youtube video which contradicts Ahmadiyya theory and MGA

Abid Mirza is new to the Ahmadiyya arguments and hasnt read much
This guy is from Canada, wherein there seems to be an organized Ahmadiyya Muslim Student Association at York University.  However, he is new to research on Ahmadiyya, and makes many errors in our conversations on Facebook.  I have told him repeatedly that he is 10 years behind my team and I.  However, he doesnt listen to us.  He needs to do independent research, not regurgitate the lies that his Mullahs have told him.  However, he wont, he is stuck with his Mullahs and thus will never learn critical thinking.  In this specific video he contradicts all of MGA’s writings vs. his critics and even ALL Ahmadiya writers after MGA, like Mahmud Ahmad and Mirza Tahir Ahmad.  Since we all know that Mirza Tahir Ahmad rejoiced in the death of Zia and Bhutto.



“Batalvi ka Anjam” in english as “The end of Batalvi” by Mir Qasim Ali, 1931

This book is not on  It is missing.  I am only posting some quotes that I found.

Page 368 footnote,

“Muhammad Husain had two wives and seven sons and three daughters. He himself says that they had all turned out to be thoroughly wicked and irreligious. They severed all connection with their father and some of them even conspired to kill him (Isha‘atus Sunnah, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 225, 226). In 1910 Muhammad Husain complained of his children’s wickedness to the Editor of Al-Hakam Qadian, who advised him to send the two younger ones to the Qadian school. He accepted this advice and sent them to Qadian. 

When his friends came to know of it he had to write in defence in the Ahl-e- Hadith, Amritsar, dated 25-2-1910 that the boys were well looked after and that their religious beliefs were not being interfered with. But the enemies of Ahmadas could not bear it, so they pressed Muhammad Husain to get his sons out of Qadian. At last he yielded and sent them to Rupar where they drifted into ways of profligacy. On December 1, 1912, the two boys were brought to the Anjuman Ahmadiyya, Lucknow, in a miserable state. There was a complaint and the matter came to the notice of the police and the court. The Ahmadis of Lucknow tried to wean them from their wicked way of life but with no success.

Muhammad Husain died a miserable death in the beginning of 1920 at Batala. (See Batalvi ka Anjam by Mir Qasim Ali, 1931) ”

Links and Related Essays

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Up ↑