Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"Raees"

“Raees e Qadiyan”–some quotes

Intro
Read this entry to get some background info on this classic book on Ahmadiyya.  Taken from here:
http://www.anti-ahmadiyya.org/en/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=160(retrieved on 10-19-17).

The quotes
—-“Mirza Saheb had announced that any non-Muslim who would write a reply to Braheen Ahmadiyya would be rewarded with Rs. 10,000. Pandit Lekhram wrote a reply by the name of Takzeeb Braheen. However this rebuttal was a shameless collection of slanders and abuse and I believe that since the humans have been born, no anti-God had abused Prophets and other people close to God in such a manner that Pandit Lekhram had penned in his book…. If one looks with fairness then it will be obvious that it was Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Saheb who provoked the said Pandit against Islam and Prophets of Islam and forcing him into writing such slander.” (Raees-e-Qadian p.1332-133 by Rafiq Dilawari).

—-“If writing a rebuttal of Braheen is ill-mannerism, then you are the first criminal, because according to Quran you had committed Kufr, you provoked us, because of which we wrote a reply. Had you not provoked us, then Permeshwar knows, that we had never thought of writings against religion of Islam. Thus if God forbid, divine punishment will descend then first its lightening will fall on your sitting room in Qadian. Then if self defense is a crime, then I too should be blamed.” (Weekly Satdharam Parcharak, Jallundher, dated 16th July 1897, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.133).

—-“I saw your letter published by Murtazai Press Lahore. In this letter you have been instructed by God to write that anyone belonging to other religion, despite staying with you for one year, does not observe any heavenly sign and does not become Muslim after satisfying himself, then you will pay Rs. 200 per month as penalty or damages. Therefore to discover the heavenly sign I am prepared to some to you on the condition that at the rate of Rs 200 per month deposit Rs 2400 in Government bank for safe keeping, and give an undertaking that if am not satisfied and do not embrace Islam after one year of your guidance and heavenly sign and miracles, then that Rs. 2400 would be handed over to me, and for a period of one year that amount will remain deposited in the government bank, you will not be entitled to take that money back. I accept to be your student for one year.” (Letter to Mirza Ghulam dated 3rd April 1885, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.163). 

—-“In my published letter I have addressed those people who are respected scholars and famous leaders of their community, whose acceptance can affect a large group of people, but you are not a man of such position or status, and if I am mistaken in this opinion of mine and you are actually a leader of your community then very good, I do not want to bother you too much, just do this that all the members of five organizations, Arya Samaj Qadian, Arya Samaj Lahore, Arya Samaj Amritsar, Arya Samaj Ludhiana, Arya Samaj Peshawer, all of them should give an undertaking on oath stating that Pandit Lekhram who is our leader, if he is subdued in this matter and will observe some sign, then all of us will embrace Islam without delay. If you do compile and send me such an undertaking within two weeks, then you will be considered a common man, who is not worth addressing.” (Letter of Mirza Ghulam dated 17th April 1885, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.163).

“That proverb fits on you: Teeth of Elephant, for showing different than for eating. And I thought that according to the contents of your letter you will be keep your promise, but I was wrong. Your statement that I should get the undertaking of members of five Arya Samaj (of five cities) proves that proverb correct that ‘a dodger have lots of excuses’. How can the members of five Arya Samaj be forced to embrace Islam by my subduing and accepting Islam? If suppose you become an Arya, your brother, relatives and other Muslims of Qadian will also embrace Arya religion? Never. Mirza Saheb! By meaningless claims lead to nothing but embarrassment. If after full investigations you embrace Arya religion, then it would be a good proof of the truthfulness of Arya religion. Similarly becoming a Muslim of a person like me will a glaring proof of the miracle of Religion of Islam. Since the fallacy of your claims of miracle have already been fully revealed to me through the Arya Samaj of Qadian, therefore I should not have really followed the saying ‘to test a tested person is foolishness’. However I would like to state this much that you are deliberately avoiding and dodging the issue.” (Letter to Mirza Ghulam dated 9th April 1885, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.164).

“Rs 200 per month was fixed for people of high status. If I fix Rs 200 for all high and low status, then from where am I going to get this much amount? If you are earning this amount from some other place, then I have no objection. Prove it that you are a man of this status …. It is obligatory on you to come to Qadian to get rid of this evil thought and verify it.” (Letter of Mirza Ghulam dated 16th April 1885, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.163).

“Mirza Saheb! The meaning of your first published was something else, letter of 7th April is saying something else and letter of 16th April is revealing something entirely different. God knows, why do you keep backing off from your statements. My last request is that if you are really truthful in your promise, and explorer of Truth, seeker of the guidance and have been appointed for the guidance of mankind, then deposit Rs 2400 at the rate of Rs 200 per month in Government bank and give an undertaking that if am not satisfied and do not embrace Islam after one year of your guidance and heavenly sign and miracles, then that Rs. 2400 would be handed over to me, and for a period of one year that amount will remain deposited in the government bank. If you are really appointed by the God Al-Mighty, then why do you refrain from giving such an undertaking and deposition of amount. When truth should not be scared and you have full faith in your miracles, then it is useless to evade it. If God has informed you and He has made this prophecy, and you, according to your own statement, have tested your prophecies on numerous occasions, then I will surely be incriminated, be subdued and become speechless. God has promised you and now you are evading fulfilling this promise.  Then how can it be accepted that there is no question of it being postponed, when you yourself do not have full faith on it. Claims of completion of altercation and to give advertisement to the effect that when the sun will rise from the west, then you will pay the amount, is casting a dark stain on an intelligent person like you. It is because of such flouting of promises by you that no Arya brother is willing to come to you. I am writing again and again that to test you miraculous power, I want to offer myself as a test and with an honest heart I accept being your student and stay in Qadian for one year. If this time as well you will evade this issue then further correspondence is useless.” (Letter of Mirza Ghulam dated 30th April 1885, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.164).

“On the one hand this humble self will deposit Rs 2400, and on the other hand you will also deposit the same amount according to my wish on the shop of a muhajin (muhajin is a shop owner in villages who gives loans on interest), as a penalty of refusing to accept Islam, so that whoever is given victory by God, it would become a souvenir of his victory.” (Letter of Mirza Ghulam dated 17th July 1885, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.163).

“The basis of our correspondence is that advertisement that you published from Mutazai Press Lahore and in which you had claimed in clear words that God has ordered you to invite people of other religions to Islam and whosoever stays with you in Qadian for one year and after seeing the heavenly sign and miracle does not embrace Islam, you will pay him damages at the rate of Rs 200 per month, an amount of Rs. 2400 for the whole year. Upon this I had requested you that I am prepared to stay with you for one year. Now you have forwarded a new condition… my dear! Why do you run away from your own publicized promises and why have you forsaken justice? Is this is the way of religious people and rightly guided persons? Now it is only fair that first you publish this advertisement that what you had publicized earlier, you are canceling it. When you had announced your miracle, you should have full belief that you will definitely perform the miracle and its impact would be right on the mark and he who witness it would surely embrace Islam. The literal meaning of miracle is to make everyone powerless. If the opponent does not become powerless and subdued then that cannot be a miracle. This shows that you yourself are in doubt about your miracle that this man (Lekhram) will not be subdued by your miracle. That is why now you are stating a new condition. Nevertheless, according to the principle ‘See the liar unto his home’, I am even prepared to accept this new condition, like you I will also deposit Rs 2400.” (Letter to Mirza Ghulam dated 20th July 1885, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.168).

“Since I doubt your steadiness, therefore make clear what kind of heavenly sign are you going to perform…… also fix the date and time of exhibiting your miracle so that it can be advertised.” (Letter to Mirza Ghulam dated 20th July 1885, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.168).

“I cannot make any condition on exhibiting miracle and neither can I show demanded miracle. I do not know what will appear. We are just an appointed servant. We do not know that what kind of sign God will exhibit.  We know and understand that sign is that thing which is beyond the power of human being. We claim only that God will definitely manifest such a sign for which humans are powerless, but the CONDITION is that to give an opinion of YES or NO regarding our miracle, such accepted judges be appointed from both sides who do not belong to the religion of both the parties.” (Letter of Mirza Ghulam, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.170).

“If you had wanted the opposite party also to deposit money, then you should have mentioned this condition in your first advertisement that like a gambler put your money against my money, so that later the conditions would not have to be changed and canceled. And if you had written clearly then even a person with low intelligence would not have paid attention to such gambling, let alone that I would have taken all the trouble of writing to you. The reason for not trusting your promises is your baseless boasting and baseless claims. ….  Truth is that you have made this boastfulness your source of earning. It was for these reasons that I had requested you to deposit the promised amount in advance. You were not right in thinking that because of your harsh conditions no one would like to remain imprisoned without chains in Qadian for one year among the peasants and ignorant people; and moreover that if no one responds then your claims would be accepted one-sidedly. But when I stood up to prove your claim wrong and because of above-mentioned reasons tried to get the promised compensation in advance, then against your advertisement you invented a new evasive tactic ……

By saying that ‘we are only an appointed servant’ and most of what you have written in the first two lines of your advertisement, it is very obvious that you are claiming prophethood, and by writing the respected name of Hazrat Eisa, you have expressed yourself to be equal to him. It wouldn’t be out of place to draw attention of Respected Muslim Scholars, because it is obvious like a sun on all special and common Muslims that Hazrat (Muhammad) is the Last Messenger. Thus why don’t they issue a religious edict on such a person, because internal enemies bring most destruction and a snake in the sleeve is more likely to be deadly. Your (Mirza’s) statement that I do not what kind of sign will God exhibit is most flimsy. The way you have been appointed for a very important service and a grand task, why have you not been informed about the secrets of your mission? And when you do not know what kind of sign will be exhibited then why did you publicize the claim of heavenly sign without God’s saying so? When the Bismillah of your inspiration is itself wrong, what are you going to achieve later? It is obvious that because of this ignorance, to appoint you to the Grand Status of a Prophet cannot be the working of God, the Knower of All Hidden Things. This is the blessing of some other person (satan). I had also requested you to show the signs that are beyond human power, we didn’t ask anything more. By you have evaded that as well. Now you have forsaken half portion of your claim, from ‘HEAVENLY SIGN’ you have retained only one half, the ‘SIGN’, and this second part that is SIGN, that also you have made it obscured, because you do not know how and what it is going to be. Thus your claim has been become totally false. At long last, you are exposed. After admitting all this, I do not know why do you make this condition that to give an opinion of YES or NO, judges should be appointed. It is true that when a case is being conducted, a doubtful matter is being presented, then you need judges. But since humans do not have knowledge of the hidden, they also shoot in the dark. If your miracle is also of such doubtful nature, then you better show such miracles to shepherds of goats and excuse us. Instead of seeing the miracles of your boasting, we prefer to stay quite.” (Letter to Mirza Ghulam dated 5th August 1885, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.171-172).

Mirza Ghulam was dumbfounded by the above, thought it wise to shut up in response. After three months Pandit wrote a post card of reminder. In reply, Mirza also sent a post card and wrote that Qadian is not far away, come and meet me, hopefully at this meeting conditions can be finalized. (Takzeeb Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya by Pandit Lekhram, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p.171-172).

“During those days when Lekhram was determined to abuse Islam and at every sentence he used to utter abuse, in his excitement he also did this that to argue with me he came to Qadian and stayed for one month. I did not go to his village or district to debate with him, neither did I initiate correspondence with him. He himself came to me in Qadian with his beastly excitement, and all Hindus of this place are witness that he stayed for nearly 25 days in Qadian, and he could not stop himself even for a single day from extremely abusive and harsh language. In the market on the track used by Muslims, he used to hurl abuses at our Holy Prophet SAAW and used words to incite Muslims. Due to fear of disturbance of peace, I had instructed Muslims not to stand in the market at the time of his speeches and no one should try to face him. Therefore, despite the fact that every day he used to be ready to create disturbance in collaboration with some ruffians, but because of my repeated advises Muslims had suppressed their excitement. Several honorable Muslims came to me during those days complaining that this man (Pandit Lekhram) is openly slandering our Holy Prophet SAAW, and I saw that they were very agitated, then I advised them politely that he is a traveler, he has come for debate, be patient. By my repeated checking, they refrained from their agitation. And Lekhram had adopted this attitude that daily he used to come to my house and demand to see some sign or miracle, and extremely ridiculing sneering words used to come out of his mouth. Always he used to come in the morning or in the afternoon, used to slander Islam and Holy Prophet SAAW in various manners, and as the cruel Christian Padres had propagated, he used to say repeatedly that ‘your Prophet (SAAW) had not performed any miracles, neither any of His prophecies were fulfilled; just to glorify your religion Mullahs have filled the books with fake miracles’.” (Faryad-e-Dard by Mirza Ghulam p.A, mentioned in Raees-e-Qadian by Rafiq Dilawari p. 175-176).

 

Some excerpts from the classic book on Ahmadiyya: “Raees e Qadiyan”

Intro
The author of book is Molana Rafiq Dilawari and the name of the book is Raees e Qadiyan. It was published for the 2nd time in 1996. The first publication is not mentioned in this book.  He also writes that MGA’s father (in roughly 1835) was living hand to mouth in a state of poverty. Out of his weak financial position, MGA’s father had to work in nearby towns and in Kashmir. Later on, because of the business of Ahmadiyya, it was Mirza Qadiyani who changed the status of family from poverty to well being.  A friend of mine wrote the Summary and Explanation in the below.

Summary and Explanation

The author of book Raees e Qadiyan states amazing facts about The family lineage of Mirza in the light of his own claims.

He writes “that in the beginning Mirza used to introduce himself as
Muballigh e Islam and used to write Mirza before his name, meaning thereby he belongs to Mughal family. In 1897 he published his book Kitabul Barriyah and at page 134 he mentioned his lineage as Mughal Barlas and that his elders entered into Punjab from Samarkand. But to the height of stupidity, at margin of page 135 of same book he wrote that on the basis of Ilham that I received, my great grand fathers were of Persian origin.

Until 1900 Mirza stayed on the belief that he was from Persian origin contrary to the family traditions as he preferred his Ilham terming his family traditions as bundles of lies. Thus he writes in his book Arbaaeen 2 page 17 “my family traditions tell we are of Mughal lineage but now Allah swt through his revelations informed me that we are of Persia origin so we have to believe that although we don,t have any proof of family traditions otherwise”.

However Masih sb had a new somersault on this issue, when he published his Risala “AIK GHALTI KA IZALA” on 5th November 1901′ he wrote on page 16 of this book that “I am of Israelite and Fatimid origin” which means he was from the Lineage of Hazrat Ishaq a.s and Hazrat Ismail a.s simultaneously. Any way now Mirza sb became 4 in 1 i.e he was from Mughal , Persian, Israelite and Fatimid lineage.

But next year he changed his stance by claiming in his book Tohfa Golravia page 40 that his elders had entered Punjab from Chinese territories.Now mirza sb claimed to be from 5 casts simultaneously. But before his death in 1908 he once again stressed his stance of being from Chinese origin in his book Chashma Moarfat page 340 by stating that the prophesy of Mohayuddin Ibn e Arabi that Masih would be from Chinese origin . has been fulfilled in his person.

Scans

The author mentions how his father converted to Ahmadiyya


Before Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad took a loan from a Hindu on interest

Intro
As we continue to dig into the life of MGA before Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya we see a pattern that has developed, i.e., that MGA was a good-for-nothing-lazy-punjabee-fraudster.  In this specific instance, we have found information which proves that MGA never had property valued at 10,000 rupees in 1879.  In fact, in those days, MGA’s brother was ruling the family dynasty, and MGA’s eldest son (Mirza Sultan Ahmad) had already been chosen to take over the family management of Qadian as soon as MGA’s brother died.  So…when MGA claimed that he would give a reward worth 10,000 rupees if anyone could refute his book, it was all hogwash.  It was all a lie.  In fact, Dard did cover up job and added the idea that MGA had property worth 10,000 in 1879 (see Life of Ahmad by Dard, page 91).  Most of this correspondance was recorded by MGA in his book Shahn-e-Haq (1887).

MGA was penniless in 1884
Even after getting money sent to him by many rich Muslims, by 1884, MGA was broke (see Dard, “Life of Ahmad”, page 134).  He had no money, he relied on his friends to send him money.  In Qadian however, MGA had no bills to pay, all he needed was money for food and transportation.

The income tax case of 1898 proves that MGA was broke in 1884
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/04/the-british-government-allowed-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-to-operate-tax_free/

Also see “Life of Ahmad”, Dard, page 595.  By 1898, MGA was claiming that his annual income was 7200 rupees, of which roughly 70% came from MGA’s followers.  MGA claimed to own some land, but not very much, he didn’t list his own house as property in the case, nor did he list any of his properties in Qadian.

Additional info
In Maktoobate Ahmadiyya page 36, Vol-5, Number 3 there is a letter that Mirza wrote to Munshi Rustam Ali on 9th May, 1887, that he wanted to set up a printing press at Qadian which will cost Rs. 1500/- So He shall be thankful, if loan of Rs.400. Is given to him. He says That he will arrange balance Rs. 800 or 900/. from some other place.
It proves that either Mirza was a penny less even in 1887 or he wanted to mint money from simple fellows.

Summary of the situation

When Mirza Qadiani published Ishtihar with challenge if somebody publishes satisfactory answers to his book Baraheen e Ahmadiayya he would pay a reward of Rs. 10,000/-, Pandit Lekhram said in his book Takzib e Baraheen e Ahmadiyya that announcement of cash reward of Rs10,000/- by Mirza Qadiani, was only a lie and deceit because Mirza Qadiani,s total moveable and immoveable property was not worth Rs.10,000/- at that time because all men and women Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs knew the state of insolvency and indebtedness of Mirza Qadiani.

This can also be judged from the fact that after marriage with Nusrat Jehan, Mirza remained a permanent guest of his father in law. Mir Nasir Nawab was a Draught man at Canal Irrigation Department. Wherever he was transferred and moved, he found Mirza there as an uninvited guest. Mirza spent many years at Ludhiana and Ambala Cantonment, breaking the breads at his fathers in law,s house.

In those days Mirza obtained a loan on interest from a Hindu Mahajin (a money lender) of Ambala Cantonment. After publishing and country vide sale of Baraheen e Ahmadiyya Mirza Qadiani got financially eased out a bit, he wrote two letters to this Hindu Mahajin to get his loan settled, calculate and receive the amount payable by him.

But unfortunately for him, his letters reached to the hands of Hindu Ariyas of Qadian. These ariyas, just to show the world that Mirza took loan on interest whereas usury is not allowed in Islam, published these two letters. Mirza Qadiani wrote these letters to Bishan Singh Ambalvi. The publication of these two letters, infuriated Mirza Qadiani.

Clarifying his position, in his Book Shahna e Haq page 37- 39, Mirza Qadiani writes:-

“ in this objection the factual position is only that I have wrote to a Hindu shopkeeper to settle my old accounts which was long pending and receive money and return the loan security. Although I don,t exactly remember the text yet I think somewhere i had requested him not to disclose that he has been called for the settlement of loan. So that our enemy may not do false propaganda. Yet Ariyas with few bad character peoples of Qadiani stole these letters which is a theft and a cognizable offence under the criminal laws. Actually these evil minded, tried to steal some money from the cash box of Bishan Singh in his absence and got hold of these two letters. After which these criminals in collusion with each others published these letters just for the defamation of us. Lala Bishan Singh being a gentle man did not bring the case to the court as these were business letters, publishing of which is a cognizable offence. So in my opinion a suit should be filed against this theft”.

(Quoted by Rafiq Dilawari in his book Raees e Qadian).

The scans


#ahmadiyya

 

MGA lost the debate with MOLVI MUHAMMAD BASHIR BHOPALI (1891)

Intro
MGA and his team only did written debates, this was how MGA got help from his team of ghost writers and debaters.  In today’s research, we have uncovered new data in terms of the debate that MGA lost in 1891, and at his own house in Qadian.  Dard mentions this incident on page 297-299.

The story

MIRZA DEBATE WITH MOLVI MUHAMMAD BASHIR BHOPALI

In October 1891 When Mirza was in Dehli and had recently escaped from the debate with Molvi Nazir Hussain in the Jamia Masjid Dehli, Molvi Muhammad Bashir Bhopali who was a high ranking Scholar and one of the disciples of Molvi Nazir, challenged Mirza Ghulam Qadiani for a debate.

Mirza Bashir Ahmad MA son of Mirza Qadiani in his book Seeratul Mahdi Volume 2 at page No 90-91 giving the accounts of this debate, writes:- “after 3 or 4 days of Jamia Masjid incident, Hazrat Masi e Moud had a debate with Molvi Muhammad Bashir Bhopali at his house (the house that MGA was staying at in Delhi). It was decided that both parties would exchange 5 papers of arguments and answers with each others but when Hazrat Masih e Moud saw that Same old arguments which were refuted earlier, were being repeated by Molvi Muhammad Bashir and no new argument is being advanced from the opponent, he ended the debate on 3 papers. Hazrat Masih e Moud did not care the humiliation and mockery of the opponents. This debate has been published with the title of Al Haq Dehli. Readers can see Hazrat sb ended the debate when Molvi sb had exhausted all his arguments and he was only doing repetition.”

See here also: https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/15/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-debate-with-batalvi-summer-of-1891-was-stopped-by-the-british-govt-on-mgas-behalf/

 

On the contrary, the actual detailed accounts of this debate has been published in the contemporary Magazines , Al Haq Assarih and Tarikh e Mirza pages 42-44. This has been compiled by Muhammad Rafiq Dilawari, author of Book Raees e Qadian, pages 341-344. Author RQ says that some body sent the Ishtihar dated 6 October 1891 published by Mirza Qadiani, for scholar of Dehli, to Molvi Muhammad Bashir Bhopali as well, who sent a reply to the Ishtihar to Mirza Sahib whereby accepting his all terms and conditions for debate. The debate was agreed on the following terms and conditions:-

1,Government security would be provided.
2.It would be a written debate. Each party would write his arguments in the session and would hand over signed copy to other for reply.
3. Issue of Life of Hazrat Essa a.s would be taken up first. If Life of Essa a.s is proved Mirza would leave his claim of Masih. And descending of Masih a.s would be discussed.
4. Any party quitting the debate without its final settlement, would be considered as the loser one.

However on arrival of Molvi Muhammad Bashir in Dehli, Mirza Qadiani in violation of earlier agreed terms and conditions added the new conditions that :
(a) the burden of proof would lie on Molvi Muhammad Bashir because he would be a claimant of life of Essa a.s.
(b) the debate would be held at Mirza,s residence with no public proceedings would be held.
(c) In all 10 persons would be allowed to participate. However Molvi Abdul Majeed and Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi would not be allowed under any circumstances.
(d) Debate would be limited to 5 papers only.

Although this was a violation of earlier terms and conditions yet Molvi Bashir accepted it. Molvi sb went to the House of Mirza and he wrote Five arguments in support of Life of Essa a.s on paper read it to the audience there and handed over a signed copy to Mirza Qadiani. Instead of writing reply in the session Mirza did not write its reply and said Ok you may leave now to come at 10 o’clock tomorrow. but when they reached next day to receive reply Mirza did not come out of house and send some one telling that the reply is not ready yet and you may leave for now. Molvei sahib will be informed as soon as the replies are ready. Peoples agitated this attitude to be a violation of the terms and condition but Mirza remained adamant. At 2 o clock they were again called by Mirza and a reply was handed over with the directions that rejoinder may be prepared at home and be delivered to him once it is ready. It continued like this for five days wherein 3 papers were exchanged. On the sixth day Mirza Qadiani announced that his father in law is seriously ill and he was quitting. Peoples said this is against the law which he himself had laid down but Mirza did not agree. Since Molvi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi and other ulema knew his level of learning, they had prepared a condemning article which was read over in Mirza, s presence peoples laughed at him made a mockery of him still it did not make any impact.

Actual reason for Mirza,s escape from debate was that as a claimant of Masih, Mirza had created two walled defence first wall being Death of Hazrat Essa a.s and the second one being descending of Essas a.s. Molvi Muhammad Bashir had destroyed his both walls and now Mirza Was to prove how he became Masih e Moud which eventually made him run for life.
(Screen shots of relevant pages Seeratul Mahdi and RQ attached)

SCANS





MUBAHILA WITH MOLVI ABDUL HAQ GHAZNAVI AND ITS IMPACT ON MIRZA QADIYANI.

Summary written by a friend of mine

In May 1893, when Mirza Qadiani was engaged in debate with Athem at Amritsar, he was challenged by Molana Abdul Haq Ghaznavi for a Mubahila after the end of his debate with Athem. Mirza replied that he would do it during debate with Athem so Mirza reached the venue on 27 May, 1893 at Eidgah ground Amritsar along-with his 25 close Mullahs. Both parties prayed may Allah,s curse fall upon the liars and may he be humiliated publicly so that masses could see and differentiate between the liars and truthful.

On 5th September,1894 when Athem,s death prophesy failed, Mirza came under sever humiliation. Peoples from all around criticised and insulted him in a harsh manner.

Abdul Haq Ghaznavi published an Ishtihar titled as bad effects of Mubahila on Mirza. Addressing to Mirza Qadiyani he wrote in Ishtihar that you had said after mubahila that whoever is on wrong path would be humiliated and black faced now tell me who is on wrong path and being humiliated . He continued that in few cases predictions of hindu pandits and astronomists proved true but in your case prophesies end up in total failure bringing u the humiliation. The timeline for Athem has elapsed and Athem is well and healthier than before. The humiliation and insult you are suffering Is the result of mubahila between us.

After this Molvi Abdul Haq Ghaznavi asked muslims and Qadianis to state under oath as to who has been under humiliation today. He said that I used to be suffering from various diseases but this year I am 100% healthy and even a single pimple has not appeared on my body and the countless blessings of Allah have been bestowed upon me that i do not like to disclose it. Whereas Mirza is receiving curse from all the country. Mirza.s Mureeds Namely Ismail of Jandiala, Yusuf Khan Sarhadi and Muhammad Saeed cousin of Mirza,s wife have converted to Christianity after Mirza,s prophesy of Athems death failed. in this way Mirza has to suffer physical and moral insult and humiliation.

In extreme anger, Mirza Qadiani replied to the ishtihar addressing AHG as under:-
“O kazzab (Liar )you have seen all this before mubahila,
u have been drowned, u have been burnet, o u the
excrement of stupids tell us when did you come out of
water u were drowned in the waters of regrets like ill fated
man, how can u protect yourself from fire which was
alighted to burn the mischievous so burn there”.

After this Mubahila Mirza has to face countless sufferings and pain which include the sudden death of his 9 year old son Mubarak Ahmed whom Mirza has boasted to be Masleh e Mouud. Mirza himself died of cholera in 1908 at Lahore in the life of Abdul Haq Ghznavi while AHG remained alive quite peacefully and comfortably after 9 years.

(ANJAM E ATHEM, page 21, HUJJATULLAH, page72,HAQIQATUL WAHI,page 240, All by MGAQ)
(Raees e Qadiyan by Rafiq Dilaweri.628-630)

The scans

SHAIKH MEHER ALI HOSHIAR PURI AND MIRZA QADIANI

Intro
You can read the Ahmadiyya side of the story in Dard, see page 140.

Summary written by a friend of mine

Shaikh Maher Ali Raees of Hoshiarpur, was a rich Mureed of Mirza Qadiyani from whom Mirza Qadiani minted lot of money in the name of Chanda. This was the man in whose TAWEELA (Animal place), at HoshiarPur, Mirza Qadiani spent more than a month in connection with committed worship (CHILLA KASHI).

It was the habit of Mirza Qadiani that whenever there take place some incident or a calamity Mirza would immediately claim that God has informed him of the happening before hand. In 1892, a man was murdered in Hoshiarpur and on suspicion Sheikh Maher Ali was arrested among others. Mirza announced that God had shown him six months ago that the floor of Sheikh,s house has caught fire and he has requested Sheikh sb for repentance thru a letter.

While Sheikh sb was locked up, Jan Muhammad, his son sent letter to Mirza requesting him to pray for release of his father. Mirza replied that “DUA KI GAI FAZAL HO JAIGA” meaning i have prayed for him God would do his favour. Remember this is a common practice in Punjab that peoples, when in trouble, solace each other with the words like “ALLAH FAZAL KAREGA” THEEK HOJAIGA “KHAIR HOGI “ etc

Shaikh Maher Ali proved innocent during trial by Session Court and was released. Mirza sent a letter to Sheikh sb stating that he has been released because of my prayers for which i have already informed your son. Now send me a letter to confirm the fact that he Mirza has predicted of his arrest and release so that people may know of this heavenly sign about my truth.

Sheikh Maher Ali sent letter thru his son stating that he, Mirza has not predicted my release but he only said God would do favour. Thus he refused to send such a testimony to Mirza. Mirza got furious to read this and published isthihar against Sheikh Maher Ali stating that I have petitioned the case of Sheikh Maher Ali in the court of Allah. On the night of 25 February 1893, Allah told me that whatever u intend for him on the earth Allah would do that in the skies, and soon Sheikh Maher Ali would suffer agony and trouble and if it is not happened and revealed to the world I would be treated as a liar.

Nothing happened to Sheikh Maher Ali he spent rest of his life quit peacefully and comfortably thus attesting the lie of Mirza Qadiyani.
(AINA KAMALAT E ISLAM PAGE 651-54 MAJMOA ISHTIHARAT PAGE 6) (RAEES E QADIYAN PAGE 536)

The scan work

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad embarrassed Noorudin in 1891

Intro
Ahmadis are fond of making some stupid challenges.  They fondly issue challenges wherein if some person loses, they must quit their religion.  This is all comes from the desi-level-mind-set.  As an alternative, why not sit down and have honest conversations and write answers to questions, with time for feedback?  Nonetheless, in this case, we have an incident from 1891, wherein Noorudin challenged a colleague of his in terms of MGA and some miracles, which Noorudin lost and he was thus embarrassed.  Enjoy…

A summary written by a colleague of mine

DR.JAGGAN NATH’S CHALLENGE TO HAKIM NOORUDDIN
Like Hakim Nooruddin, Dr, Jaggan Nath Civil Surgeon Jammu was one of the physicians of Raja Amar Singh, President Council state of Jammu and Kashmir. He enjoyed eminence in the Darbar. Dr. Jaggan Nath belongs to Arya Hindu religion. Sometime he had a light religious dialogue with Hakim Nooruddin who always used to sing praising songs of his prophet Mirza Qadiyani.

One day Dr sb said to Hakim Nooruddin jokingly. If your Mirza sb is a true Maseel e Masih then he must have power of giving life to dead. Hakim sb said yes he can. Dr. JN starts laughing but Hakim sb got serious both Dr. Sb and Hakim Nooruddin had a bet that if Mirza succeeds in putting dead back to life, Dr. Jaggan Nath would accept Islam along with his family and if Mirza fails to do so Hakim Nooruddin would pay a penalty of Rs 5000/-. One month time line was fixed and an affidavit was signed by both which was witnessed by Khan Bahadur Ghulam Mohiyuudin Member Council J&K., Munshi Sirajuddin Ahmad Superintendent Postal deptt J&K and Sarkar Singh Secretary to Raja Amar Singh president Council J&K.

Once the affidavit was signed, Hakim Nooruddin wrote a letter to Mirza Qadiani, to apprise him of his bet with Dr. Jaggan Nath and requesting him to come to Jammu to show this miracle to Dr, J.N.
Mirza got disturbed to know this and start thinking as to how to get rid of this sudden mission impossible. Mirza dared not go to Jammu as in that case his lie would have been disclosed to peoples there, however, on 31 March 1891 he wrote a letter to Hakim Nooruddin as under:-
My Dear brother Molvi Nooruddin sb,
This humble self has intended to revert to Allah and ask for His attention and intent in this regard, but due to fits of diseases, weakness of mind beside another irritant, this could not be done. I hope Allah would allow me to ask to him of this issue very soon. Because before going into this display of supernatural thing, permission would be sought from almighty Allah and then the terms and conditions would be decided.
Because for such thing to do, travail is important but my health do not allow me to do such labour. Had it been in my best of health it would have taken days to get it done. However, if Dr sb is a truth seeker he must keep in mind that Time line may be re arranged, this timeline should be such as peoples determine in their date to date business and there should be no undue conditionalities are attached to this. But remember it would only be done once the permission from Allah is granted on this .
Humble-self
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
(Maktoobat e Ahmadiya vol 5 No 2 page 103)

Hakeem Nooruddin got panicked to receive this reply from MGAQ. He wrote another letter to Mirza explaining him the embarrassment he would face in case if Mirza does not come to show the miracle. On his request Dr. Jaggan Nath also sent a letter to him to come to Jammu to prove the claim of Hakim sb. In response to both letters Mirza sent a letter dated 12 April 1891. See how beautifully he avoided and ran away from such a show.

Makhdoomi. Mukarami Akhwaim Molvi Hakim Nooruddin sb,
Sallamhollah taala.(salutations)
Received letter from Dr. Sb. Dr. Sb wants me to show such supernaturals which the light in my heart does not allow me to do. I know the powers of Allah is unlimited yet I also know that each event is conditional to its time of occurrence that prior to this the the heart does not touch the required level of enthusiasm. Miraculous events are not this much open but they have implied sign which a truth seeker understand immediately. These miracles are so because Allah do not want to break the condition of IMAN BIL GHAIB (believing in un seen)
So as long as the request of Dr. Sb is not based on this principle he would be considered only a non serious truth seeker.
Umble self
Ghulam Ahmad
(Maktobat e Ahmadiyya vol 5 No 2 page 105)

After receiving this reply from Mirza, Hakim Nooruddin found no place to hide his face. Meantime the time line for this bet was elapsed. Dr. Jaggan Nath demanded penalty amount Rs.5000/- from Nooruddin who for some time kept payment pending for one pretext or the other. One day Dr, J.N called Nooruddin and the witnesses. He read the text of affidavit over to them and demanded penalty money. He humiliated Mirza and Nooruddin in front f all present and threatened that he would not spare them till he sees the miracle or recovers the penalty amount from Nooruddin. The situation became so grim that Raja Amar singh has to intervene to redeem Nooruddin, he persuaded Dr, sb to end the controversy. Then Raja Amar Singh called for the affidavit and tore it apart.

The story did not end here after some time Mirza narrated this whole event in his book Izala Auham declaring Dr. Jaggan Nath to have avoided the challenge and run from the scene. Dr, sb took a serious notice of this and offered Mirza and Nooruddin to show any of heavenly sign for his Maseel e Masih. Mirza replied that such sign would appear in one year. This was rejected by Dr. J.N saying that Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w did not ask Abu jahl to wait for one year he s.a.w just divided moon into two pieces then and there.
(Ref. Raees e Qadiyan. Maktoobat e Ahmadiyya, Izala Auham. Tabligh e Risalat)

The main references
(Ref. Raees e Qadiyan. Maktoobat e Ahmadiyya, Izala Auham. Tabligh e Risalat)

The scans

Lekh Ram stumped MGA in his Face-to-Face discussion in 1885

Intro
Ahmadiyya leadership orders its mullahs to lie on their behalf, on behalf of the Mirza family that is.  To this end, the Ahmadiyya mullah team has been openly lying, brainwashing simple Ahmadis and financially exploiting its own people.  Further, they have went back to all of the literature and deleted and edited as they deemed fit.  In the case that I present in the below, Ahmadiyya leadership purposely left out the FACT that MGA met with Lekh Ram, as he visited Qadian, and he seems to have stumped MGA with a question and proved MGA to be an idiot.  Remember, Noorudin, Abdul Karim, Irfani and Mufti Muhammad Sadiq werent in Qadian to help MGA at this time, they came later, after 1890.  Finally, it should be noted that this story was never presented by an Ahmadi authors.

Summary 

In 1884, Mirza Qadiyani wrote letters to Hindu and Christian Missionaries to come to Qadiyan, stay there for one year they will witness the sign of my prophethood during this period if no such sign witnessed by them, he will pay Rs.2400.00 to such person ( @ Rs200/- per month).

Pandit Lekhram responded to show his willingness to visit Qadiyan. Since Mirza wants this stunt only to prove himself and gain popularity, he created many hurdles to stop him from coming to Qadiyan. Like he sent him a list of strict terms & conditions which include demand of financial guarantee from pandit. He also used delay tactics , yet Pandit Lekhram did not bother, crossed all barriers and reached Qadiyan

His hurricane arrival at Qadiyan took Mirza by surprise. One day Mirza was discussing the terms of his stay at Qadiyan to witness a sign, the discussion diverted toward definition of MOJIZA or
SUPER NATURAL things. LEKHRAM SAID SUPERNATURAL means something which breaks the law of nature. Like, he said, knife is meant to cut , fire,s purpose is to burn And a tree can not walk. Now if you r a truthful prophet you show me some thing where knife do not cut , fire refuse to burn and tree start walking on your permission. IF U SHOW ME ANY OF THIS I WILL EMBRACE ISLAM BUT IF U FAILS TO DO THIS YOU MAY ACCEPT HINDUISM.

Mirza refused to do this by saying such definition of MOJIZA , supernatural is not in Quraan. Lekhram SAID the words MOJIZA HAS NOT BEEN MENTIONED IN QURAN ALTOGETHER. MIRZA INSISTED THAT WORDS IS THERE IN QURAAN. LEKHRAM SAID BRING THE Quraan, Quraan was brought ! Lekhram handed it over to Mirza and said ok show it to me where this word MOJIZA appears in Quraan. Mirza flipped the pages of Quraan over and over but failed to find any such words.

Finally Mirza said ok it is not there i take my words back. Pandit Lekhram has quoted this in his book Takzib Brahin Ahmadiya in mirza,s life but he or Nooruddin could not deny this. Lekhram said Hakim jay kishan, Lala Nihal Chand Lala Lachmi Sahai, Hakim Daya Ram, Kamaluddin the cousin of Mgaq,Munshi Murad Ali and an old man traveler were present at the time of this dialogue.

(Taken from book Raeese Qadiyan quoting from Takzib barahin,ahmadiya. Page 86.).

The scans

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s debate with Batalvi (summer of 1891) was stopped by the British govt on MGA’s behalf

Intro
MGA was always favored by the British government, in fact, he was always given a chair when he went to court, whereas all other indians were forced to stand, moreover, the white people never even considered Indians as humans, since in terms of trains, white people never traveled in the same car as Indians.  Nonetheless, I have produced in the reference in the below wherein Dr. Basharat Ahmad explains how the British govt. intervened and kicked Batalvi out of Ludhiana and hence ended his debate with MGA.  Further, it is interesting to note that MGA barely had 5 debates in his entire career, this was one the earliest, and it was never a fair debate, since the British police were on the scene, protecting MGA and his team.  Further, MGA and his team would have been killed if it wasnt for the British govt.  This kept happening over and over again…read this entry about MGA in 1904 and a riot.

A summary of this quotation

The collaboration and cooperation between British colonial empire and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani has not been a secret issue. Mirza, in his book, himself states that he was planted by Britishers.

However, Ahmadi mullah either don,t accept this or do interpret this differently to creat polarisation so that the lies remain hidden from the eyes of simple ahmadi fellows.

Dr. Bashaarat Ahmad a Lahori Qadiayni, while describing the 13 days long debate between MGAQ and Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, held on 20 July, 1891 at Ludhiana, states that there developed a situation of Law and Order in Ludhiana after the debate. The British govt ordered Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi and his fellow Ulema to leave the city of Ludhiana immediately. British Deputy Commissioner deputed one deputy and In charge Police Station Ludhiana to execute the orders who physically expelled Molana and his friends from Ludhiana.

On the contrary No such orders were issued against Mirza Qadiyani. Mirza made some correspondence with Britishers, but, perhaps for the fear of opponents, he moved to Amritsar at his own. Dr.Basharat writes that In Amritsar Mirza Qadiani received a letter from Deputy Commissioner Ludhiana that the expel orders were for Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, not for you. You may stay at Ludhiana. Author has reproduced letter as under:-

From the court of W Chevys
Deputy Commissioner Ludhiana,

To Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Raees e Qadiyani sb Salamat,

Your letter dated yesterday was perused and heard and in response it is mentioned that subject to law, you have got the same rights available to stay at Ludhiana, as are available to other law abiding subjects of British Government.

Signature Sahib Deputy Commissioner Bahadur,
Dated 06 August 1891.
Molana Muhammad Hussain filed appeals for this discrimination at Lahore but no body heard him.

The scans

 

 

Up ↑