Search results

"Zafrullah khan"

“The Head of The Ahmadiyya Movement” by Muhammad Zafrullah Khan (1950)

We have found a book by the grand liar and political puppet of the British Government, Muhammad Zafrullah Khan.  This book seems to have been written in 1950, while Muhammad Zafrullah Khan was the foreign minister of Pakistan.  He totally lies and claims that the entire coast of Sierra Leone is now Ahmadi.  By 2019, there are over 6 million people in Sierra Leone, of which 4 million are Sunni-Muslims, Ahmadi sources continue to lie and claim 500k Ahmadi’s in 2019.  On February 1921, the first missionary of the Community, Abdur Raheem Nayyar, would set foot on the territory. Nayyar stayed temporarily in the capital Freetown, whilst he was on his route towards Saltpond, in modern-day Ghana, and Lagos, in Nigeria for his missionary activities.  After an interval of 15 years, Nazir Ahmad Ali arrived in 1937 as a permanent missionary to Sierra Leone. Ali had spent a year at the Gold Coast, modern-day Ghana, after his arrival from India. Upon the year of his arrival, Ali settled in Freetown, and established the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community of Sierra Leone. Before long, he gave a lecture at the Wilberforce Memorial Hall,[1] the principal public meeting place of the city,[2] addressing the Muslim and Christian populations of the country. In this early address, he introduced the Community and the coming of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as the Imam Mahdi for the Muslims, and the second coming of Jesus for the Christians. At another event, he solely addressed Muslims at the Islamia School adjacent to a Mandinka mosque.[1] Such addresses directed at the Muslim populations often gave rise to hostilities from Muslim communities. Perhaps for his safety, Ali moved into the house of Kande Bure, chief of the Temne people of Freetown, and a Cabinet minister.[3]

However, having been rejected by the majority of Muslim groups in Freetown, Ali decided to move to a coastal town, Mange Bure, in the Port Loko District. Kande Bure himself was born in Mange Bure, where his father was an influential political figure. Having achieved little success in his preaching efforts, Ali moved; this time in the same district to the small port-town of Rokupr.[3] Here Ali had reasonable success, where he managed to establish a small community of Ahmadi Muslims, among them a number of local influential figures. Rokupr was also the site of the first school established by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community of Sierra Leone.[3]

The Head of The Ahmadiyyah Movement

Links and Related Essays

Zafrullah Khan’s career defending Ahmadiyya started in 1921, as he visited Rufus Isaacs, the Governor-General of India

The Ahmadiyya Movement has always been pro-British, since MGA was always pro-British.  In June of 1921, the Ahmadiyya Khalifa sent a delegation of Ahmadi’s to Simla to schmooze the Governor-General of India, The Earl of Reading, Rufus Daniel Isaacs, 1st Marquess of ReadingGCBGCSIGCIEGCVOPC (10 October 1860 – 30 December 1935).  This would be Zafrullah Khan’s first time working with the British via Ahmadiyya, but not his last.

The PDF work
Ahmadiya Deputation The Leader 27 June 1921

Links and Related Essays

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

The failed marriages of Muhammad Zafrullah Khan (1893-1985)

Zafrullah colluded with the British Colonists before and after WW-2.  In fact, he was the Ahmadi voice in parliament and he sided with the British in many situations.  He hurt Pakistan and made sure that that “British-interest” were of the highest priority, he even represented Palestine and made sure that they lost all cases.  He secretly wrote the Lahore Resolution in 1940, as London was bombed and the British feared that they would soon lost India to Japan.

His children
Ahmadi sources normally shy away from this topic.  Nevertheless, Zafrullah Khan only had one child, a daughter named Amtul Haye.  In 2019, her whereabouts are totally unknown, it is also unknown whether she had any surviving children.  Ahmadiyya sources tell us that he passed away while in Lahore at his daughter and son-in-laws house.

He married his cousin inititally
It has been reported to us that Zafrullah Khan married his cousin (Iqbal Begum) as his first marriage, she died soon thereafter.  He then married her sister (Rashida Begum), she also died a few years after the marriage, we have to assume that all of this happened by 1930.  He then married Badar Begum of the Behar Colony in British-India.  She gave Zafrullah Khan his only child, Amtul Haye.  Badar Begum filed for divorce soon after and lived as a single-parent by roughly 1940.  In 1955/1956, Zafrullah Khan married for the 4th time.  This time he seems to have fell in love with a Lebanese girl (Bushra Rabani, who was living in Syria)(Also See the Alyum magazine from Cairo, 1955), he performed the Nikkah ceremony in the Pakistani embassy in Syria.  Syrians Muslims called this marriage as illegal in the press.  She divorced Zafrullah Khan a few years later.  It is unclear if Zafrullah married again.


Links and Related Essays


#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

In 1985, Zafrullah Khan admitted to boycotting the funeral of Jinnah and gives a stupid excuse


As we all know, Zafrullah Khan publicly and proudly boycotted the funeral of Muhammad Ali Jinnah.  This was very disrespectful and proved that Ahmadis consider themselves as separate from the Muslims of Pakistan, Shia and Sunni.  Further, Zafrullah Khan was bold and arrogant, most likely because he had enjoyed British support since the 1930’s.  Nonetheless, he gave aggressive and arrogant comments in court in terms of Takfir, wherein he described Pakistan as a country of infidels and etc.  Eventually, he was forced out of cabinet in 1954-55, however, the British awarded him by making him a President of the UN.  The issue here is that Ahmadis have an unbreakable allegiance to the Mirza family, and thus cant be trusted in affairs of the state of Pakistan, or any country for that matter.

Why did Zaf Khan boycott the funeral?
Even though Zaf Khan gave many excuses as to why he didnt participate.  The real story is that his Khalifa, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad had prohibited Ahmadis from participating in funeral prayers and all other prayers with Sunnis/Shias and whomever.

In this picture…
In the picture in the above:

This is an excerpt from Book Siyasi otar Charaho. (Political ups& downs) by Munir Ahmad Munir ( I have no idea about his religion) The author asks Chaudhry Zafarullah reasons of his non participation in the funeral prayers of Qaide Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. In response Zaf. Says he would have been criticised if he offers the prayer and would have been considered as Hypocrite by muslims. That muslims have issued excommunication Fatwas against us, that we have an Imam we have to obey him.

But a Sunni was leading the funeral prayer of Jinnah who was a Sunni
It is important to note…Jinnah was a shia..and his funeral was led by a Sunni.  There was no problem….the entire country participated.  This was a moment of Muslim unity in Pakistan, however, the Ahmadis were ordered to not pray with Muslims.  Further…the imam who led the funeral service had made harsh remarks towards Jinnah and Pakistan.  Finally, when Muslims go to Hajj, they pray behind whatever Imam is present, Muslims dont discriminate.  However, when Mahmud Ahmad made Hajj in 1913, before his Khilafat, he prayed “fake-salaat” when he was stuck…and then returned to his tent and did his real salaat…or so he says, see, “truth about the split” (1924).


Links and Related Essays

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Some data on Zafrullah Khan boycotting the funeral of Jinnah

Sir Zafarullah Khan went to attend Jinnah`s funeral . In his own words :

“So! My intention in being there was to offer the congregational prayers along with everyone else—- if I had not intended and fervently desired to pray for my leader, would it not have been more logical and make sense for me have stayed home— and not having come to the funeral?

He did not attend the funeral , not because he wanted some Ahmedi to lead it (which was very unlikely anyways) , but because it was being led by a person who considered ahmedis to be kafir , In words of Zafarullah Khan :

“I was told that the cleric (mullah) who was to lead the prayer was none other than a person named Shabir Usmani who had used vile and abusive language against the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement.”

Now tell me that will any one offer prayers behind a person who abuses his prophet / Messiah ??

This man (Shabbir Usmani) had declared that Shia were Kafir too , ironically he led the public funeral prayers of Jinnah ; A Shia whose coffin was transported from the Governor’s House to the burial location constantly accompanied by a black Alam (flag) on which was inscribed “Ya Hazrat-e-Abbas” !!!

“The [Sindh High] court pro-ceedings bear evidence of the last rites observed by Miss Jinnah immediately after her brother’s death. Witness Syed Anisul Hasnain, a Shia scholar, deposed that he had arranged the ghusl (last bath) of Jinnah on the instructions of Miss Jin-nah. He led his namaz-e janaza (funeral prayer) in a room of the Governor General’s House at which such Shia luminaries as Yusuf Haroon, Hashim Raza and Aftab Hatim Alavi were present,while Liaquat Ali Khan, a Sunni, waited outside the room. !! 

Links and Related Essays

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Zafrullah Khan totally lied about the 1974 Rabwah-terrorist-train-attacks incident

The British government is always looking for people to work with them and for them as they advance their political agenda, and globally.

I have written about this before…

Zafrullah Khan’s full account of the incident
“””In the middle of 1974 they devised a plan which was aimed at provoking anger and
rancour against the Ahmadiyya Cominunity which unfortunately succeeded only too well in its immediate purpose.An incident was staged at the Rabwah railway station, which was so managed that a party of students who belonged to an organization bitterly hostile to the Movement succeeded in provoking a number of Ahmadis, who happened to be present at the railway station when the train carrying the students arrived, into a conflict in which slight injuries were inflicted on some of the students in the party. At the next stop of the train preparations had already been made to receive the students as heroes who had suffered grievous injuries in the cause of Islam at the hands of the members of the Movement. Fiery speeches were made and the incident was painted in lurid colours. The utterly false and misleading accounts of the incident were further embroidered in the press next morning, with the addition of such false, fictitious and horrifying details as that the students had been cruelly maimed, that some of them had their tongues cut out and that others had their genitals cut off. This sent a wave of horror throughout the province and all sorts of premeditated atrocities were let loose against the members of the Movement~ ;In the inquiry subsequently conducted by aJudge of the Lahore High Court into the incident, it was established by the medical evidence produced that all the injuries alleged to have been received by some of the students were simple bruises and scars and not a single one of them was grievous.

For reason’s undisclosed the report of the inquiry has not been published so far. This lends colour to the speculation that the administration does not come out too well in the report. Be that as it may, it is a fact that in the widespread disorders that followed upon the Rabwah incident, as it came to be known, a number of Ahmadis were killed, maimed and injured, and there was large-scale looting and destruction of properties of Ahmadis. In not a single instance did the police or the civil authorities intervene to extend their protection to the victims of violence, no investigation was made into any of the numerous outrages committed against the persons and properties of the Ahmadis, no one was arrested or tried in respect of any of them, and no compensation was awarded to any Ahmadi for the loss inflicted upon him. There were several instances in which the police openly and actively encouraged the unruly and disorderly elements to do their worst.””””

“Ahmadiyya the Renaissance of Islam” (1978), this was just four years after the “Rabwah-terrorist-attacks”.

See pages 347-348

My commentary
Zaf Khan gives no references at all.  He quotes no newspapers.  And he did this strategically, so as to lie to the public.  Remember, this was the only official comments by Ahmadiyya leadership in terms of the Rabwah-train-attacks.  And Zaf Khan made it look like Ahmadis were innocent. However, as the Samdani commission reported in the newspapers, the President of “safety” in Rabwah was present during the attack and coordinating it.

Links and Related Essays

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Justice Muhammad Munir on Zafrullah Khan purposely losing Gurdaspur district during partition

Chief Justice Muhammad Munir presided over the 1954 Ahmadiyya riots inquiry.  However, before that he worked with Zafrullah Khan in 1947 in terms of the Punjab Boundary Commission. In fact, years later (1964), he lamented how Zafrullah Khan and the Ahmadi’s chose to be considered non-Muslim during this boundary discussion and thus caused the Gurdaspur district to go to India, since Muslim’s weren’t in majority. Nevertheless, the story that we are presenting today is in terms of the first African-American Ahmadi imam and his reminisces from the 1954 court case, since he accompanied the Khalifa to court. As you can see by the explanation in the below, the Khalifa and Justice Munir were fast friends, and he didn’t allow anyone to ask the Khalifa any tough questions.

1974 NA Proceedings page 1267 (pdf file page 658):
Pakistan Times. June 24, 1964
“Days I remember” by Justice Muhammad Munir

“In connection with this part of the case, I cannot reframe from mentioning an extremely unfortunate circumstance. I have never under stood why the Ahmadis [i.e. Qadianis—followers of QK2] submitted a separate representation. The need for such representation could arise only if the Ahmadis [Qadianis] did not agree with the Muslim League’s case-it self a regrettable possibility. Perhaps, they intended to reinforce the Muslim League’s case; but in doing so, the game the facts and figures for different parts of Gash Shankar, thus giving prominence to the fact that, in the areas between the river Bein and the river Basantar, the non-Muslims Constituted a majority and providing argument for the Contention that if the area between the rivers Ujh and Bein went to India, the area between the Bein river and Basantar river would automatically go to India. As it is, this area has remained with us. But the stand taken by the Ahmadis [Qadianis] did create considerable embarrassment for us in the case of Gurdaspur.”

Links and Related Essays

Brief Life Sketch of Chaudhry Sir Muhammad Zafrulla Khan

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Who is Chaudhry Asadullah Khan?

He was the younger brother of the famous Ahmadi, Chaudhry Muhammad Zafrullah Khan, he seems to have been born in roughly 1904, he had another brother named Shukrullah Khan, his father’s name was Chaudhry Nasrullah Khan (died on September 2, 1926), he was also a lawyer. He shows up on the Ahmadiyya scene in September of 1931. He was sent to Kashmir in September of 1931, per the order of the Khalifa, who was also the President of the All India Kashmir Committee, to help poor Kashmiri’s fight their cases vs. the Maharaja (See Khan “The construction of the Ahmadiyya Identity”).

He was in England studying for the BAR exam (See “My Mother” by Zafrullah Khan).

He is sent by his Khalifa to inspect the tract of 1000 acres of land, which would eventually be called Rabwah (see page 24).

His son, Ijaz Nasrullah Khan was killed in the 2010 Ahmadiyya Lahore mosque attacks.

Links and Related Essays

Brief Life Sketch of Chaudhry Sir Muhammad Zafrulla Khan


Facebook to its moderators: Look out for phrase ‘Free Kashmir’

Copland, Ian, “Islam and Political Mobilization in Kashmir, 1931-34”, which was published in an academic journal entitled: “PACIFIC AFFAIRS”, Vol. 54, No. 2 (Summer, 1981), pp. 228-259 (32 pages), Published by: Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia

Heroes of Kashmir : Molvi Muhammad Abdullah Vakil

#yuzasaf #jesusinindia #kashmir

“Mirzaiyat se Taubah” on in english as”Repentance from Mirza’s religion” by Dr. Abdullah Khan Akhtar

Dr. Abdullah Khan Akhtar a resident of Jatoi Distt Muzaffar Garh Punjab then British India, now Pakistan, was an eighth class student before partition of India in 1947.

At that time Choudhry Abdullah Khan, brother of Zafrullah Khan, was a Punchayat Officer in District Muzaffar Garh. He got a teacher of the School converted to Qadianism and this Qadiani Teacher placed trap on young Abdullah Khan Akhtar to make him Qadiani, sent him to Qadian for further studies with recommendation letters of Ch. Abdullah.Young Abdullah Khan Akhtar entered into qadiani pledge at the hand of Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmoud who was Khalifa at that time.

After completion of education Akhtar was sent to Malaya Singapore as an Ahmadi Muballigh. He returned to Qadian from there after 3 1/2 years tenure and got married in a notable family of Qadian. He kept on his mission of ahmadiyya tabilgh across india, In Mumbai, Agra, Mongir, Shahjehanpur, Lucknow, Putna and in Punjab. He debated with Molana Lal Hussain Akhtar Ex ahmadi in Sargodha and Jhang after partition. Strongly opposed Tehreek Khatme Nabuwwat of 1953.

After the Tehreek Khatme Nabuwwat the court of Enquiry was set up which called Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmoud Khalifa of Qadianis, for statement and cross questioning. The statement of Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmoud caught Akhtar by surprise and he started to revisit his views about the Ahmadiyya.

Following were the Questions and answers between Court of Enquiry and Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmoud:-

COE. If someone, After having a careful look at the claims of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani, denies them, will he remain a muslim?

MBM. Yes He would be considered a muslim in general terms.

COE. In your witness you have said that one would continue to remain a muslim even if he do not believes in Mirza sb honestly. Is it your belief since the beginning?

MBM: yes.

Do you consider Mirza sb among those appointed/ messengers, no body can be called muslim without believing in them.?

MBM. I have already replied to this question that any body who do not believe in Mirza sb can not be called to be out of the pail of Islam.

COE: whether believing in Mirza sb is a part of IMAN?

MBM: No.

These Question answers were published in a book (at pages 10 to 32, ) under Darul Tajleed Urdu Bazar Lahore with photograph of Khalifa sb on title page.

These answers were shocking for Akhtar as these were against the basic instructions of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani and in contradiction of writings of khalifa sb himself and in blatant negation of basic ahmadi beliefs.

Dr. Abdullah Khan Akhtar then left ahmadiyya reverted to Islam and sought repentance of Allah for adopting a false religion and started tabligh e Islam among ahmadis to compensate for his being part of Ahmadiyya activities in a long period of his life.

He wrote a book titled as MIRZAIYAT SE TAUBAH.


No automatic alt text available.
No automatic alt text available.
No automatic alt text available.
No automatic alt text available.
No automatic alt text available.

Up ↑