Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"Zikr-e-Habib"

“Zikr-e-Habib” by Mufti Muhammad Sadiq (1926)

Intro
Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was an inside man working for MGA.  In 1926, he published a controversial book on the life and times of his master, MGA, this seems to be the first edition, the second edition was published later, the original is obviously missing.  In this book, he officially changed the year of birth of MGA to 1835.  He also told how MGA also frequented “opera-houses” and etc in British India.  MGA was even shown as willing to favor rich people over poor people.  Mufti Muhammad even lied about the conversion of Mr. Wragge to Ahmadiyya, which never happened.  MGA would give Mufti Muhammad Sadiq drugs without explaining what was in them.  This book is spelled as Dhikr-e-Habib in the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah.

Some quotes

“””Once Munshi Zafar complained about mufti Muhammad sadiq (who use to sleep on same bed due to small size of munshi Zafar ) to mirza ghulam ahamd qadyani , in absence of Muhammad Sadiq that he has gone to theatre . Mirza qadyani replied that ” I have also gone once It is to see what happens there . And he said nothing more”””Reference: page 18 – zikry habib

Zikray Habib page 34
A small Toilet was changed into room in Gurdaspur for mirza Qadyani after cleaning and adding tiles.  Mirza Qadyani then use to sit alone locked inside that room for 2-3 hours.
______________________________________________________________________________________________

PAGE 85 under the caption 
“ORDEAL FACED BY GHULAM HUSSAIN”
“”””Once while playing in the house of Huzur (MGQ), Children had a quarrel. The son of Ghulam Hussain Owen man, (a poor), has uttered obnoxious word for the Son of Shaikh Rehmatullah 
(a rich man and a big chanda payer). The son of Shaikh sb complained to hazrat sahib (MGQ). Hazrat Sahib punished the son of Ghulam Hussain, the Roti baker, with few slaps on his face. Wife of Ghulam Hussain could not control her emotions, she expressed her anger against this act of Hazrat Sahib (MGQ) before husband in objectionable manners. HAZRAT sahib (MGQ), ordered Ghulam Hussain to immediately leave the Qadian with family. He remained out of Qadian for two years before his apology was accepted and he was allowed to return.”””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 106
Mufti Muhammad Sadiq recalls how Muhammad Ali translated the letter of warning to Piggot.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

“”””Narrated by Mufti Muhammad Sadiqra: In August 1903 a Christian of Bannu of the name of Gul Muhammad came to Qadian and indulged in very irreverent argumentation and discussion and he went back in the same attitude. After he had left, the Promised Messiahas saw in a dream that Gul Muhammad was applying collyrium to his eyes. The Promised Messiahas said that this was an indication that he would be guided aright. Several years later it was heard that
he had reverted to Islam. I received a post card from the widow of the well known Dr. Pennell of Bannu in which she stated that Gul Muhammad had left Christianity and had reverted to his original faith.”””[Dhikr-e-Habib by Hadrat Muhammad Sadiq, p. 111](see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1047)
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 216
[Arabic] [He it is; He Who has expelled your illwishers and then caused your claim to flourish.]
[Dhikr-e-Habib, p. 216].(see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1034)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 221, also see page 1032 in the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, see the scan at the very bottom

“””[Arabic] [I am with Allah, the Mighty, the Great. (2) You are from Me and I am from you.}”””(see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1032)

“””Three shaving blades 2- one bottle of perfume”””Referring to the year 1897, (see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1032)

“””Out of three , one will face Azab”””Referring to the year 1897, (see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1032)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 222
“””Topah; or Topah””

MGA directed that this word should be looked up in the Hebrew lexicon, it may be a Hebrew word. [Dhikr-e-Habib by Mufti Muhammad Sadiq, first edition, published by Book Depot Talifo
Isha‘at Qadian, District Gurdaspur, December 1926, p. 222](see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1032)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Pages, 238-239

“””That is [Arabic] Your prayer has been heard in the matter of your followers and your children.”””

[Dhikr-e-Habib, p. 238, by Hadrat Mufti Muhammad Sadiqra, Letter of Maulavi ‘Abdul-Karim, November 6](see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1042).

Dr. Shiekh Nur Ahmad’s son fell seriously ill with an attack of epilepsy and his condition became so serious as to cause disappointment. The Promised Messiahas supplicated on his behalf and received the revelation:

[Arabic] [I am Allah, Lord of bounty.] and the boy recovered.
(see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1040)

The Promised Messiah said: After a slight slumber, I received the revelation:

[Arabic] We belong to Allah, [Urdu] our brother has passed away from this world.

[He observed that he] did not know to whom this related, but it was a condolence and an expression of sympathy from God Almighty. (see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1040)

[Arabic] At such time death draws near. Allah has power to do all that He wills.
[Dhikr-e-Habib, p. 239](see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1040)

“This humble one was born in the month of Phalugna on a Friday on the 14th night of the moon”
________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 240
“”” [Arabic] Thus indeed do We reward those who do good deeds. [Dhikr-e-Habib, p. 240](see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1041)
________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 245, Mufti Muhammad Sadiq is writing a letter to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

“There is taneen (tinnitus maybe?) in my ears, if it suitable to take tablets (he is referring to a particular tablet) please send them to me.  I feel ashamed to trouble you again and again, if it is ok please write me the composition/ingredients so I can make it myself.”

There is a footnote here by Sadiq
“Once due to stomach/digestion problem, I suffered from fever repeatedly, Hazrat sahib used to buy fresh ingredients to make a tablet made it with his own blessed hands and send it to me.  Allah gave me the cure/shiffa with it, I did not know its ingredients at the time, but Hazrat Sahib told me later.”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Another Excerpt, page 336
Mufti Muhammd Sadiq relates:

“””“In 1904, I was head master at Talim ul Islam high school of Qadian.  During those days, I would accompany Hazrat Aqdas (aka MGA) during the court case of Karam Din, at Gurdaspur, and suffered from light fever all the time, after the court case was over, episodes of fever increased, due to that I was staying at home most of the time and could not concentrate on the teaching work. I was under the treatment of Molvi Nooruddin, when I had no benefit from his treatment, Hazrat Masih Maud started to give me his medicines and I was benefitted by a certain tablet, Hazrat Masih Maood prepared it with hands daily and send it to me.  I asked repeatedly about the ingredients, so that I am able to make it myself, without troubling him but he (MGA) would not tell me.  He used to tell me that he can make it and send it to me.  The reason for my insisting was that I did not want to trouble him for making it.  His precious time is not spent on making the tablet rather it could be spent on important religious work.  Out of kindness of his heart, Hazoor always made the tablet and then sent it to me.  Later on, I found out the composition of that tablet, it was Afyun (bhung) dhatora quinine, and Kaphoor, also more ingredients of the same nature.  That tablet is famous by the name of Hib-a-Jadid” and is sold in all medicine sellers of Qadian””””.

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/15/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-helped-change-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-from-1839-40-to-1835/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/mga-was-born-in-1839-per-the-ror-of-june-1906/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-lies-about-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/24/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-favored-the-children-of-rich-chanda-heavy-giving-ahmadis-over-the-poor-ones/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/23/in-1891-when-mga-made-his-big-claims-he-denied-prophethood-mufti-sadiq-was-heavily-involved/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/11/06/review-of-religions-may-and-june-of-1939-professor-clement-lindley-wragges-interview-of-mga-from-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/11/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-frequented-british-opera-houses-in-the-punjab-per-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-his-companion/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/23/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-was-drugged-by-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/23/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-liked-to-lock-himself-in-a-room-for-hours/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Zikr-e-Habib

http://wiki.qern.org/mirza-ghulam-ahmad/publications/a-warning-to-a-pretender-to-divinity

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Maulana Abu Kalamazad was unaware of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s claims of prophethood in June of 1908

Intro
His full name is MaulanaSayyid Abul Kalam Ghulam Muhiyuddin Ahmed bin Khairuddin Al-Hussaini. When MGA died, he seems to have written a lengthy obituary (wherein he also says that MGA died of cholera) wherein he didn’t know about MGA’s claim to prophethood, thus, Maulana Abu Kalamazad was in-the-dark about the claims of MGA and gave him a positive review. The English Review of Religions of June 1908, did not mention the obituary of the newspaper Wakil (pronounced Vakil), the reason was that Maulana Abu Kalamazad claimed that MGA died of cholera, which was well known, even the Ahmadi Khalifa (Maulvi Noorudin) wrote the same in June of 1908. Even Farquhar wrote the same in 1915. This is also the word that was used by MGA’s father-in-law, Mir Nasir Nawab in the 1920’s as he narrated to Shaikh Ali Yacub Irfani his autobiography. In 1918, Ahmadi’s told Walter that MGA had died of intestine trouble, which is proof that Ahmadi’s lie openly and are willingly ordered to cover-up the truth and thus, the story was changed in Ahmadiyya history. Nowadays, Ahmadi’s are willfully ignoring the full facts of what Maulana Abu Kalamazad wrote about MGA. It should be noted that Maulana Abu Kalamazad also believed that Esa (As) had died and would never return to Earth, he also disbelieved in the hadith about the Mahdi, that’s probably why he had a good view of MGA in 1908. In 1919, he famously wrote that Ahmadi’s had gone too far by ascribing prophethood to MGA. By 1936, however, his attitude had totally changed, he called both the Qadiani and Lahori branches as mis-guided. Also, read about Abdul Majeed Salik and his testimony about Maulana Abu Kalamazad and MGA’s death.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

His comments when MGA died
(Wakeel, Amritsar), 30th May, 1908
https://www.muslim.org/sa-case/evidence/s20.htm

“That man, that very great man, whose pen was a magic wand and whose tongue spell-binding; that man whose brain was a complex of wonders, whose eye could revive the dying and whose call aroused those in the graves, whose fingers held the wires of revolution and whose fists were electrical batteries; that man who for thirty years was an earth-quake and typhoon for the religious world, who, like the trumpet of Doomsday, awakened those lost in the slumber of life, he has left the world empty-handed. This bitter death, this cup of poison, which entrusted the deceased to dust, will remain on thousands, nay millions of tongues, as words of bitter disappointment and regret. The stroke of death which slaughtered, along with one who was very much alive, the hopes and longings of many, and the wails it raises of lament, will remain in memories for a long time to come.

“The demise of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad sahib of Qadian is not such an event that a lesson should not be learnt from it, nor should it be consigned to the passage of time to efface. Such people who produce a religious or intellectual revolution are not born often. These sons of history, in whom it rightly takes pride, appear but rarely on the world scene, and when they do they bring about a revolution for all to see.

“In spite of our strong differences with Mirza sahib in respect of some of his claims and beliefs, his separation for ever has convinced the educated and enlightened Muslims that one of their very great personages has left them. And with him the mighty defence of Islam against its opponents, which was linked with his person, has come to an end. His special characteristic, that he acted against the enemies of Islam as a victorious general, compels us to express openly our feeling that the grand movement which for so long defeated and trod over our opponents should be continued in the future also.

“Mirza sahib appeared in the front line of devotees who, for the cause of Islam, accepted the dedication to sacrifice their time from the cradle, through the springs and autumns, to their graves in fulfilling the pledge of loyalty to their beautiful beloved Islam. …

“The literature produced by Mirza sahib in his confrontation with the Christians and the Aryas has received the seal of general approval, and for this distinction he needs no introduction. We have to acknowledge the value and greatness of this literature from the bottom of our hearts, now that it has done its work. This is because that time cannot be forgotten nor effaced from the mind when Islam was besieged by attacks on all sides, and the Muslims, who had been entrusted with the defence of Islam by the Real Defender, as the means of defence in this world of causes and means, were lying flat sobbing in the aftermath of their shortcomings, doing nothing for Islam or not being able to do anything for it. …

“Then began that counter-attack from the side of the Muslims in which Mirza sahib had a part. That defence not only shattered to bits the initial influence of Christianity, which it really had due to support from the government, and saved thousands, nay millions, of Muslims from this dangerous attack which would have succeeded, but the talisman of Christianity itself was blown away like smoke. …

“So, this service rendered by Mirza sahib will place the coming generations under a debt of gratitude, in that he fulfilled his duty of the defence of Islam by joining the front rank of those engaged in the jihad by the pen, and he left behind him as a memorial such literature as will last so long as Muslims have blood flowing in their veins and the urge to support Islam remains their prominent national characteristic. Besides this, Mirza sahib performed a very special service for Islam by crushing the poisonous fangs of the Arya Samaj. … His writings against the Arya Samaj shed clear light on the claim that, however much the scope of our defence may be widened in the future, it is impossible that these writings could ever be overlooked.

“Natural intelligence, application and dexterity, and continuous debates, had lent Mirza sahib a special splendour. He had vast knowledge, not only of his own religion, but also of other religions. And he was able to use his vast knowledge with great finesse. In the art of preaching and teaching, he had acquired the accomplishment that the person whom he addressed, of whatever understanding or religion, was thrown into deep thought by his spontaneous reply. India today is an exhibition house of religions, and the number of great and small faiths found here, along with their mutual struggles which announce their existence, cannot be matched anywhere else in the world. Mirza sahib’s claim was that he was the arbiter and judge for them all, but there is no doubt that he possessed a special talent to make Islam pre-eminent among all these religions. This was due to his natural ability, taste for study, and hard work. It is not likely that a man of this grandeur will be born again in the religious world of the Indian sub-continent, who would devote his highest desires in this way to the study of religions.”

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1919

The above conclusion drawn from Maulana Abul Kalam’s letter is further corroborated by two of his earlier writings on the subject. The first of these is a passage which occurs in the Maulana’s well-known book the Tadhkirah published in 1919. Writing about Sayyid Muhammad of Jaunpur who claimed to be the Mahdi, the Maulana says: 

”The affair of the Sayyid of whom we are speaking is full of wonder, and various sorts of claims and absurd sayings have been attributed to him. What the followers of a person say need not be paid attention to, for whomever a people take for their religious leader they would raise him to no less a dignity than that of God-bead, and if they are very careful they would not keep him below the position of a prophet. But some recent writers have written things which at first sight cause perturbance. Shah Abdul Haq, the Muhaddath of Delhi, writes:

‘According to Sayyid Muhammad of Jaunpur, every perfection possessed by the Holy Prophet Muhammad was also possessed by Sayyid Muhammad, the only difference being that there it was in asalat (possessed originally) and here it was by tab’iyyat (attained by following), and by following the Holy Prophet he attained to such a place that he became like a prophet.’

“Reading these words of Shah Sahib, it occurred to me that in our own days a big section of the followers of the Mirza Sahib of Qadian entertains an exactly similar belief about the Mirza Sahib and lays the foundation of all its ghuluww (exceeding the bounds) and ighraq (exaggeration) on this difference of asalat (possessing originally) and tabe’ijyat (attaining by following)” (pp. 30, 31).
___________________________________________________________________________

1936
http://aaiil.org/text/books/mali/maulanaabulkalamazadahmadiyyamovement/maulanaabulkalamazadahmadiyyamovement.shtml

Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was once drawn by a correspondent of the daily Zamindar [16 June, 1936] of Lahore into the controversy as to the nature of the claims of the Founder of the Ahmadiyyah Movement and the rights of the Ahmadiyya communities to claim a position within Islam. Both these matters were set at rest by the Maulana in the very first passage of his first letter to the said correspondent thus:

“You enquire which one of the two Ahmadi groups follows the true path, the Qadian group or the Lahore one. In my opinion neither is on the true and right path, but the Qadian section has gone too far in its ghuluww, so far that the very fundamentals of Islam have been shaken; for instance, its belief that for faith and salvation the known and admitted doctrines of Islam are not now sufficient and that it is essential to believe in the Mirza Sahib of Qadian. But the Lahore group denies this ghuluww; it neither confesses a faith in the prophethood of the Mirza Sahib nor does it add any new condition to the conditions of faith; where it has stumbled is in the misplaced belief which it has created for the Mirza Sahib.”

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/20/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-cholera-new-evidence-found-in-aug-2017-the-vakil-newspaper-amritsar-dated-30th-may-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/11/abdul-majeed-salik-and-his-relationship-with-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/15/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-helped-change-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-from-1839-40-to-1835/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/mga-was-born-in-1839-per-the-ror-of-june-1906/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-lies-about-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1908.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/31/ahmad-the-messenger-of-the-latter-days-by-mirza-bashir-ud-din-mahmud-ahmad-1924/

Happy Birthday to You Mirza Ghulam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/14/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-swears-that-he-was-nearly-60-years-old-in-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Zikr-e-Habib

https://theartofmisinformation.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/age-of-the-imam-mahdi-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/03/farquhar-claims-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-cholera/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/05/27/walter-was-told-by-ahmadiyya-leadership-that-mga-died-of-intestinal-trouble-1917-1918/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/05/25/ahmadiyya-leadership-never-gave-a-cause-of-death-for-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/02/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-an-opium-overdose-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/20/mirza-tahir-ahmad-authenticated-the-book-hyat-e-nasir-1927/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/12/maulana-abu-kalamazad-was-the-editor-of-the-vakil-in-1908-when-mga-died/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=cholera

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/16/was-maulana-abu-kalamazad-the-editor-of-the-vakil-in-1908-and-his-relationship-with-ahmadis/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/20/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-cholera-new-evidence-found-in-aug-2017-the-vakil-newspaper-amritsar-dated-30th-may-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/03/farquhar-claims-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-cholera/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/02/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-an-opium-overdose-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/06/13/new-data-found-on-the-death-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-via-cholera-from-june-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/05/27/walter-was-told-by-ahmadiyya-leadership-that-mga-died-of-intestinal-trouble-1917-1918/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abul_Kalam_Azad

https://www.muslim.org/sa-case/evidence/s20.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_in_India

http://aaiil.org/text/books/mali/maulanaabulkalamazadahmadiyyamovement/maulanaabulkalamazadahmadiyyamovement.shtml

Tags
#maulanaabukalamazad #islaminindia #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian #cholera #deathbycholera

 

Muhammad Hussain Batalvi wrote about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s circus debate in Delhi in 1891

Intro
We have recently wrote extensively about MGA and his debate in Delhi with Nadhir Hussain in Oct of 1891. We have found additional information from the Ishaat us Sunnah Magazine which explains what MGA did during these debates.

Ishaat us Sunnah, Volume-14 , publication Year 1891, pages 2 onwards: 

MIRZA QADIANI AND HIS CIRCUS IN LUDHIANA AND DEHLI.

In July 1891 Mirza Ghulam Qadiani had a debate with Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi at Ludhiana and ran away from there on 31 July. After being humiliated at Ludhiana, Mirza in his Ishtihar dated Ist August 1891, invited Batalvi sb to have debate with him at Lahore. Batalvi sb replied that he is ready to debate with him at Lahore Peshawar or Qadian. Mirza sb backed out.

He then planned to try his luck at Dehli. He reached Dehli in October, 1891, where he published an Ishtihar challenging Molvi Syed Nazir Hussain for a debate he also put the name of Molvi Abdul Haq in his Ishtihar. Mirza Qadiani thought Molvi Nazir and Abdul Haq, due to their old age, would not come to face him and Molana Batalvi would also be far away from Dehli so he would get a “walk over.”

What happened was that Molvi Abdul Haq accepted the challenge and Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi (ever chasing MGQ), also reached Dehli. Before the arrival of Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, Mirza Qadiani had negotiated the debate on the following un reasonable terms and conditions:-

a.)Special permission of Deputy Commissioner should be issued in his name.
b.)A European officer should be ever present in the gathering.
c.) Debators should write with their hands and read over to public no munshi or Scribe is permitted.

But when Muhammad Hussain Batalvi reached Dehli, Mirza Qadiani went to Molana Abdul Haq and said your name was mentioned in the debate erroneously . He said I do not want to debate with you. Molvi Abdul Haq said he is ready to withdraw if you publish an ishtihar to this effect. So Mirza sb issued an Ishtihar on 6th of October saying that he do not want to debate with Molvi Abdul haq because he had met him and found him a monk like person. He do not like to interact with govt officials hence he would debate only with Nazir Hussain who may keep Muhammad Hussain Batalvi with him for assistance during debate.

This trick, however failed when Molvi Abdul Haq replied in a published Ishtihar that he can arrange anything and invited Mirza sb to come to the Town Hall on 11th October for this debate otherwise he would be termed as liar. Mean time Muhammad Hussain Batalvi published Ishtihar inviting Mirza sb to have debate with him if he loses than Mirza sb may debate with Molvi Nazir Hussain. He requested him to come to the Chandni Mahal on 11th Oct, 1891 at 9.AM. The ishtihar further states that all terms and conditions laid by you are acceptable and we do not lay any terms and condition from our side. All arrangements have been finalised with the expenditures of hand sum amount.

Mirza sb replied that he hates to debate with Molvi Muhammad Hussain and would have it with Molvi Nazir Hussain only. This refusal was accepted by Molvi Nazir Hussain and Mirza sb was informed that his challenge to Debate with Molvi Nazir Hussain, has been accepted and he must come to Chandni Mahal on 11th Oct. However Mirza sb breached this agreement on the pretext of law and order situation and wrote a letter to defer this debate till Ghulam Qadir would inform Deputy Commissioner.

On 5th October, Molvi Nazir Hussain wrote to Mirza to come to his house and talk to him directly to remove his apprehensions, still Mirza sb refused and said there should be a European officer in the debate. After that 14 letters were sent to Mirza sb for debate from Ulema of Dehli inviting Mirza sb but he refused to all.

One of them was Molvi Abdul Majeed who invited Mirza sb and offered a reward money of Rs 1000/-in case Mirza prove his claims.Molvi Rahim Bakhsh invited Mirza, Molvi Mujaddid Ali Khan too invited Mirza sb for debate on 10th Oct at Masjid Fatehpuri , Molvi Abdul Hamid invited Mirza sb to come to the roof top of his house and he would be at his roof top, there would be Bazar between two and no risk of life would be there, but Mirza sb did not agree and dared not to come out of his heavily guarded house.

Mirza Ghulam Qadiani,s escape from debate of Chandni Mahal brought great humiliations to him. So he thought of washing of this defamation. He brought another Ishtihar dated 17 Oct 1891 wherein he used abusive language against Molvi Nazir Hussain and challenged to declare him liar in his claims and in his arguments under oath in open before general public. Molvi Nazir Hussain went to Jamia Masjid Dehli with general public and sent message to Mirza sb that he is ready to give such statement under oath now come to us in Jamia Masjid and state your claims and arguments before us.

This message was given to Mirza sb through Nawab Saeeduddin Khan of Loharo, Molvi Abdul Majid and Mir Basharat Hussain Kotwal City. Mirza sb refused to this.

After prayer Molvi Abdul Majid, Nawab Saeeduddin Khan and Syed Bashir Hussain Inspector Police went to Mirza sb and asked him to give them in writing that he would repent if Molvi Nazir Hussain rejects his claims and arguments on oath. Mirza sb got puzzled on this demand and remained silent. However, his deputy Mullahs stood up and said we would repent after one month subject to the condition that Molvi Nazir Hussain would not fall ill or suffer from fever and headache during this period.

Subsequently, few questions were asked from Mirza sb through the City Superintendent Sahab Bahdur, as under:-

City Superintendent: why Do you not cut short your arguments and agree to give a written statement.
MGQ and his Side:- we want to talk on the life and death issue of Jesus Pbuh and nothing else.
Molvi Abdul Majid :-We want to settle this issue including all of your claims. Do you have a proof to your claim of Messiah ship.

MGQ and side : same answer.

City Superintendent:- Addressing to Mirza sb, Are you Messiah? If yes what is the proof? Suppose Jesus has died then why should you be considered a Messiah give us a proof?

MGQ. :-Remains silence.

Khwaja Muhammad Yusuf from MGQ side: addressing to Molvi Sahib , Hazrat if someone wants to be muslim why do do you not allow him to be?

Molvi sb. Yes if he repents he is our brother!
Khwaja sb. I can bring his written repentance just now. He would write it down that whatever he wrote against Quraan and Hadis is rejected and he is a muslim.

Mirza sb wrote repentance but in the same language as that of he published in his Ishtihar of 12 October.
Molvi sb. He should write that he seeks repentance from Allah for whatever anti Islam he wrote in Tozihula maram, Fathe Islam and Izala auham.
After few more meaningless exchanges between the parties, the City Superintendent Sahab Bahadur announces to end the proceeding and Mirza sb and his deputy mullahs returned under police escort.

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/12/13/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-debate-with-syed-nazeer-hussain-of-delhi-in-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/14/who-is-syed-muhammad-hussain-batalvi-1840-1920/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/06/zikr-e-habib-by-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-1936/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-molana-muhammad-hussain-batalvi-and-muslims-leaders-in-british-india-in-august-of-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mga-lost-the-debate-with-molvi-muhammad-bashir-bhopali-1891/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syed_Nazeer_Husain

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-queen-of-the-princely-state-of-bhopal-invested-heavily-1878-into-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-his-braheen-they-were-disappointed-by-the-product/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/07/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-mubahila-in-1889-with-syed-muhammad-hussain-batalvi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/mirza-ghulams-ahmad-lecture-in-amritsar-nov-1905-was-not-a-lecture-it-was-a-riot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/15/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-debate-with-batalvi-summer-of-1891-was-stopped-by-the-british-govt-on-mgas-behalf/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/27/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-spoke-with-a-terrible-stutter-and-ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-it-they-called-it-a-stammer/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/08/mir-nasir-nawab-the-father-in-law-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mga-lost-the-debate-with-molvi-muhammad-bashir-bhopali-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-had-5-written-debates-no-oral-debates/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/23/in-1891-when-mga-made-his-big-claims-he-denied-prophethood-mufti-sadiq-was-heavily-involved/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=ghos

thttps://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-embarrassed-noorudin-in-1891/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s debate with Syed Nazeer Hussain of Delhi in 1891

Intro
On September 29th, 1891, MGA arrived in Delhi and stayed at Kothi Nawab Loharu, Ballimara. Just a few months before this, MGA was in Ludhiana and had a debate with Batalvi, this was in late July and early August 1891, the British police intervened and helped MGA, Batalvi and his friends were ordered to leave Ludhiana immediately. MGA must have went to Qadian right after and thus returned to this general area, remember, Qadian is 85 miles west of Ludhiana, and Delhi is 274 miles east of Qadian. Remember, MGA only did written debates. Therefore, he issued a leaflet on October 2nd, 1891, by which he declared, to hold a discussion with Maulawi Muhammad Nadhir Husain or Maulawi Abu Muhammad Abdul Haq, who were both looked upon as the highest authorities on orthodoxy. The discussion, he suggested, should be in writing and on the subject as to whether Jesus was alive or dead according to Muslim Scriptures (See Dard). The debate never happened, the British intervened on MGA’s behalf and saved his life.

10-2-1891
MGA and his team publish a leaflet inviting Maulawi Muhammad Nadhir Husain or Maulawi Abu Muhammad Abdul Haq to a written debate. Maulawi Muhammad Nadhir Husain was roughly 88 years old. Maulawi Abu Muhammad Abdul Haq refused to have a written debate per Ahmadi sources (See Dard).

10-5-1891
On 5th October, Molvi Nazir Hussain wrote to Mirza to come to his house and talk to him directly to remove his apprehensions, still Mirza sb refused and said there should be a European officer in the debate. After that 14 letters were sent to Mirza sb for debate from Ulema of Dehli inviting Mirza sb but he refused to all (See Ishaat us Sunnah of 1891). What happened was that Molvi Abdul Haq accepted the challenge and Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi (ever chasing MGQ), also reached Dehli. Before the arrival of Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, Mirza Qadiani had negotiated the debate on the following un-reasonable terms and conditions:-

a.)Special permission of Deputy Commissioner should be issued in his name.
b.)A European officer should be ever present in the gathering.
c.) Debators should write with their hands and read over to public no munshi or Scribe is permitted.

One of them was Molvi Abdul Majeed who invited Mirza sb and offered a reward money of Rs 1000/-in case Mirza prove his claims.Molvi Rahim Bakhsh invited Mirza, Molvi Mujaddid Ali Khan too invited Mirza sb for debate on 10th Oct at Masjid Fatehpuri , Molvi Abdul Hamid invited Mirza sb to come to the roof top of his house and he would be at his roof top, there would be Bazar between two and no risk of life would be there, but Mirza sb did not agree and dared not to come out of his heavily guarded house.

10-6-1891
On October 6th, 1891, repeating his invitation to a debate as he published another announcement the Akhbar Khair Khah Hind Press, Delhi (see Dard). Maulawi Muhammad Nadhir Husain announced that a debate would be held with MGA on a certain date. MGA was invited to the place at the time of the meeting when his house was surrounded by hundreds of angry people who were hurling abuse upon MGA from the street. Thus, MGA didn’t show up to the debate (dard). However, Muhammad Hussain Batalvi in his newspaper tells us how MGA issued an Ishtihar on 6th of October saying that he do not want to debate with Molvi Abdul haq because he had met him and found him a monk like person. He do not like to interact with govt officials hence he would debate only with Nazir Hussain who may keep Muhammad Hussain Batalvi with him for assistance during debate. But when Muhammad Hussain Batalvi reached Dehli, Mirza Qadiani went to Molana Abdul Haq and said your name was mentioned in the debate erroneously . He said I do not want to debate with you. Molvi Abdul Haq said he is ready to withdraw if you publish an ishtihar to this effect This trick, however failed when Molvi Abdul Haq replied in a published Ishtihar that he can arrange anything and invited Mirza sb to come to the Town Hall on 11th October for this debate otherwise he would be termed as liar. Mean time Muhammad Hussain Batalvi published Ishtihar inviting Mirza sb to have debate with him if he loses than Mirza sb may debate with Molvi Nazir Hussain. He requested him to come to the Chandni Mahal on 11th Oct, 1891 at 9.AM. The ishtihar further states that all terms and conditions laid by you are acceptable and we do not lay any terms and condition from our side. All arrangements have been finalised with the expenditures of hand sum amount.

10-13-1891
Maulawi Muhammad Nadhir Husain seems to have published an announcement which said that his pupils, Abdul Majid and Muhammad Husain, would reply on his behalf and that MGA should address his pupils in the future (see Dard).

10-15-1891
Simulataneously, MGA agrees to debate Maulvi Muhammad Bashir Bhopali (a disciple of Nadhir Husain). The debate is scheduled to be held at MGA’s house in Delhi on 10-23-1891.

10-17-1891
MGA challenged Nadhir Husain to a decisive debate. MGA suggested October 18th, 19th or 20th for the debate and offered a reward of Rs. 25 for each Quranic verse or authentic tradition quoted by his opponents which showed that Jesus (as) was still alive in the flesh in the heavens (see Dard). MGA said that at the end of this debate, he (MGA) would pray for a decisive judgment, and he believed that the wrath of God would overtake Nadhir Husain within one year on account of his transgression in misleading the people (see Tadhkirah, and The Announcement of October 17, 1891, Majmu‘ah Ishtiharat, vol. 1, p. 249). Per Ahmadiyya sources, Nadhir Husain agreed to the debate to be held on October 20th in the Juma‘ Masjid, Delhi (See Dard). Mirza Ghulam Qadiani,s escape from debate of Chandni Mahal brought great humiliations to him. So he thought of washing of this defamation. He brought another Ishtihar dated 17 Oct 1891 wherein he used abusive language against Molvi Nazir Hussain and challenged to declare him liar in his claims and in his arguments under oath in open before general public. Molvi Nazir Hussain went to Jamia Masjid Dehli with general public and sent message to Mirza sb that he is ready to give such statement under oath now come to us in Jamia Masjid and state your claims and arguments before us.

This message was given to Mirza sb through Nawab Saeeduddin Khan of Loharo, Molvi Abdul Majid and Mir Basharat Hussain Kotwal City. Mirza sb refused to this.

10-20-1891
Per Ahmadiyya sources, more than 5,000 people gathered on that day in the Mosque. The
European Superintendent of the city police was himself present there with an Inspector and a police force adequate for the occasion. There was great agitation in the city. Feelings ran high and there was great tension. The 12 disciples of MGA gathered round him. Ch. Sher Muhammad, uncle to Maulawi Sher Ali, was left at the house with another friend. The 12 disciples of MGA accompanied him to the cathedral Mosque in horsedriven carriages, and there the party walked through the angry crowd straight to the mihrab and took their
seats. A little later Nadhir Husain also arrived with Muhammad Husain Batalvi and Abdul Majid.
They were seated in the adjoining veranda. It was the time of ‘Asr, all Muslims in the mosque prayed together. MGA and his disciples had did not join the prayers. Nadhir Husain declared that MGA was a Kafir, thus, a debate with him was invalid, MGA was a Kafir since he claimed prophethood and denied miracles. MGA and his team immediately denied their claim to prophethood and claimed that they believed in miracles (both lies). MGA even claimed that he believed in the Miraaj, however, he had just recently denied it in Izala Auham. MGA even had a British official make the announcement a second time. There was an uproar. The British official ordered all Muslims to leave the mosque. MGA and his group of 12 Ahmadi’s were the only ones allowed to stay. MGA and his disciples exited the mosque via the north gate, however, the carriage and driver that they had rented was gone. The superintendant of the local police also showed up. A mob scene erupted. MGA’s disciples found another carriage for hire, they escaped via British escort, Maulvi Abdul Karim traveled with MGA in the carriage and a few others, all the others walked, they were Sayyid Amir Ali Shah, Ghulam Qadir Fasih,
Muhammad Khan of Kapurthala, Hakim Fadl Din of Bhera, Pir Sirajul Haq, and six others (see Dard).

10-21-1891 and 10-22-1891
MGA wrote three letters to Maulawi Muhammad Bashir on October 21st, 22nd and 23rd
and the following points were further laid down: The debate should begin after the Friday prayers in MGA’s house. (2) Maulawi Muhammad Bashir would write the first paper. (3) Maulawi Muhammad Bashir would bring only 10 men with him. (4) Maulawi Muhammad Husain Batalvi and Maulawi Abdul Majid would not be allowed to take part. (5) Not more than five papers would be exchanged. It should be noted that it was not agreed that the papers would be
written in the meeting (See Dard).

10-23-1891
On October 23rd, 1891, MGA had another announcement published wherein he desperately tried to explain himself foe what happened at the Jama Masjid, Delhi and the lack of a proper debate, which was printed at the Iftikhar Press, Delhi. A detailed report of everything that happened was published in a supplement to the Punjab Gazette, dated November 14th (see Dard). On the same day, MGA had another debate with Maulvi Muhammad Bashir Bhopali, who was another disciple of Nadhir Husain on a Friday (see Dard).

10-28-1891
MGA abruptly leaves the debate. MGA breaks his own contract, which is a serious crime per the Quran. Only 3 arguments had been put forward by Maulvi Muhammad Bashir Bhopali and no response had been given by MGA and his team. MGA flees to Patiala wherein his father-in-law was ill, however, Mir Nasir Nawab hadn’t accepted Ahmadiyya yet. Patiala was 157 miles to the west, about halfway home towards Qadian (see Dard).

10-30-1891
On roughly this day, MGA arrives with his team in Patiala at the house of Sh. Fadl Karim (see Dard). Per Ahmadiyya sources, a local imam, Muhammad Ishaq, came to see MGA and had a talk with him on the subject of the death of Jesus.The imam destroyed MGA and spread the news in the town with the comment that MGA had been defeated. In defense, MGA issue a leaflet on October 31st in which he asked the imam to have a debate with him. He waited there till November 2nd, but the mullah did not come forward. Then MGA returned to Qadian.

11-3-1891
MGA returns to Qadian safe and sound.

12-27-1891
The first annual Jalsa in Ahmadiyya history is held at Qadian, MGA and his team had already pre-written out “Nishan Asmani” which is read out to the less than 100 Ahmadi’s who are present. In this book, MGA talks about Batalvi and Nazeer Hussain. MGA calls him Miyan Nadhir Husain (See Asmani Faisalah, page-1, online english edition). MGA mentions Miyan Nadhir Husain 22 times, he mentions, and Muhammad Husain Batalawi 29 times. Per Ahmadiyya sources, the book itself was published in the early part of 1892, by May at the latest (see Hidden Treasures).

1892–June
MGA and his team publish “Nishan Asmani”, Mian Nadhir Hussain is mentioned 9 times.

1893
MGA mentions Nadhir Hussain in his book “The Truth Revealed”, “Sachai Ka Izhar”.

1898
MGA claims that he has Nadhir Hussain sign a edict of Kufr vs. his own disciple, Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi.

1902–April
MGA publishes “”Dafi‘ul-Bala’ Wa Mi‘yaro Ahlil-Istifa”””,  English Version “””Defence Against the Plague and a Criterion for the Elect of God”””, wherein he mentions his debate with Nadhir in 1891 as well as the fact that Nadhir was the first cleric to sign his stamp of approval of MGA’s apostacy.

1902–Sep 1st
‘Tofha Golarviyyah is published. MGA mentions Nadhir Hussain.

1902–Oct
Syed Nazeer Husain died on 13 October 1902 in Delhi. MGA is happy about this and in classic fashion backdates a fake revelation. As can be seen, this wasn’t published uyntil 2 weeks after Nadhir Hussain died, however, 20 years later Mufti Muhammad Sadiq claims that MGA got the revelation on August 15th, 1902 (See Zikr-e-Habib), Mirza Bashir Ahmad also commented that the words of this ilham also point to the year* of his death (See Tadhkirah). The reference is to the al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 39, October 31, 1902, p. 7–10:

[Arabic] The leading ones will be driven to their graves.
and 


[Arabic] One who was in error has died a rebel.

1906-1907
In Haqiqatul Wahy, Nadhir Hussain is mentioned 11 times. MGA claims that he published a sign in the early versions of the Braheen e Ahmadiyya wherein Maulawi Nadhir Husain of Delhi would issue a verdict proclaiming me (MGA) a disbeliever, however, on closer research, the sign doesn’t seem to exist. In fact, the word Nadhir doesn’t exist in the first 4 volumes of the Braheen.

1908–Oct
Braheen e Ahmadiyya volume 5 is published, Nadhir Hussain is mentioned once.

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/14/who-is-syed-muhammad-hussain-batalvi-1840-1920/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/06/zikr-e-habib-by-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-1936/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-molana-muhammad-hussain-batalvi-and-muslims-leaders-in-british-india-in-august-of-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mga-lost-the-debate-with-molvi-muhammad-bashir-bhopali-1891/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syed_Nazeer_Husain

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-queen-of-the-princely-state-of-bhopal-invested-heavily-1878-into-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-his-braheen-they-were-disappointed-by-the-product/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/07/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-mubahila-in-1889-with-syed-muhammad-hussain-batalvi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/mirza-ghulams-ahmad-lecture-in-amritsar-nov-1905-was-not-a-lecture-it-was-a-riot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/15/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-debate-with-batalvi-summer-of-1891-was-stopped-by-the-british-govt-on-mgas-behalf/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/27/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-spoke-with-a-terrible-stutter-and-ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-it-they-called-it-a-stammer/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/08/mir-nasir-nawab-the-father-in-law-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mga-lost-the-debate-with-molvi-muhammad-bashir-bhopali-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-had-5-written-debates-no-oral-debates/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/23/in-1891-when-mga-made-his-big-claims-he-denied-prophethood-mufti-sadiq-was-heavily-involved/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=ghos

thttps://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-embarrassed-noorudin-in-1891/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Who is Syed Nazeer Hussain of Delhi (1805–13 October 1902) and his connection with Ahmadiyya

Intro
Syed Nazeer Hussain of Delhi (1805–1902), his name has many variations, it could also be Maulawi Nadhir Husain or Maulvi Nazeer Hussain of Delhi or Miyan Nadhir Husain Dehlvi and  Maulavi Sayyed Nadhir Husain Dehlvi. was a leading scholar of the reformist Ahl-i Hadith movement and one of its major proponents in India. Earning the appellation shaykh al-kull (teacher of all, or the shaykh of all knowledge) for his authority among early Ahl-i Hadith scholars, he is regarded, alongside Siddiq Hasan Khan (1832–1890), as the founder of the movement and has been described as “perhaps the single most influential figure in the spread of the Ahl-i-Ḥadīth”. Among Syed Nazeer Husain’s students were Imdadullah Muhajir ,Makki, Muhammad Qasim Nanotvi and Rashid Ahmad Gangohi,[29] the founding figures of the Deobandi movement. Although Mirza Ghulam Ahmad never studied under him. Prior to pledging his allegiance to Ghulam Ahmad and becoming his foremost disciple, Hakim Nur-ud-Din had also studied under Husain. Other students of Husain included the Afghan-Indian scholar Abdullah Ghaznavi; the two major Ahl-i Hadith proponents Muhammad Husain Batalvi and Sana’ullah Amritsari, both vociferous opponents of the early Ahmadiyya movement;[33] and the Indian hadith scholar Shams-ul-Haq Azimabadi.The modernist founder of the Aligarh Movement and Muslim University Syed Ahmad Khan, also studied under Husain in the 1850s.

1857–1868
Nazeer Husain advocated political quietism and was among a large number of Muslim ulema, from both the Sunni and Shia sects, who supported British rule and rejected calls for armed jihad against it.[13][14] He was also among a number of Muslim scholars, including the muftis of Mecca, who declared British India to be dar al-Islam (abode of peace) and not Dar al-harb (abode of war).[14] During the Indian Rebellion of 1857, he resisted pressure from the mutineers to call for a jihad and instead declared in favour of British rule, viewing the Muslim-British relationship as a legal contract which could not be broken unless their religious rights were breached.[15] Despite having denied any involvement in the rebellion in its aftermath and having strongly opposed the declaration of jihad as sinful and a faithless breach of covenant,[12] Husain was widely believed to have been among a group of Delhi ulema pressured into signing a jihad fatwa.[16] 

Because he was seen by the British as the only scholar of the Ahl-i Hadith who could allay the conflict between the movement and followers of the prevailing Hanafi school of thought, which often resulted in civil disturbances that the Government sought to prevent, and because he also knew English which was very rare among Indian Muslim scholars at the time, Husain’s turbulent relations with the British at Delhi had improved.[7] He was granted a letter of recommendation by the government to the British Vice Consul in Jedda when he travelled there in 1883 to perform the Hajj pilgrimage. However, he was already denounced as a Wahhabi by Indian Hanafis to the Ottoman governor of Jedda who had him arrested and imprisoned before he could present the letter. He was later released with the intervention of the British Vice Consul.[3]

1868
He was arrested in 1868 by the British on suspicion of being the leader of the Wahhabi insurgents in Delhi and detained for six months but was eventually released without charge after it had emerged that he had not supported the rebels.[17][18] Husain consistently denied any links with the Wahhabis as well as any role in the Delhi uprising in 1857.[17]

1870
Within a couple of years of his release from prison in 1868, Hussain, together with Siddiq Hasan Khan of Bhopal and Muhammad Husain Batalvi (c.1840–1920), two influential fellow alumni of the Madrasah-i Rahimiyah, formally founded the politico-religious organisation known as the Jamaat Ahl-i Hadith, the Party of the People of the Hadith.

1884
He read out MGA’s nikkah (marriage ceremony) with a Nusrat Jehan, who’s family was also Ahl-e-Hadith. MGA gave him Rs. 5 and a prayer mat.

1885
Siddiq Hassan Khan and other top Maulvi’s call MGA a Kafir and tear up the Braheen e Ahmadiyya and sent it to Qadian as such.

1889
Maulvi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi was the one of the only remaining Ahl-e-Hadith leaders who still considered MGA a Muslim, however, in this year, MGA claimed to be the Messiah and Batalvi turned on him.

1891, Feb-March
MGA challenges Syed Nazeer Hussain of Delhi to a Mubahila in Amritsar, he also challenges Batalvi, Maulawi Abdul Jabbar and Maulawi Abdul Haq (see Dard).

1891, September 29th
MGA reached Delhi on September 29th, 1891, and stayed at Kothi Nawab Loharu, Ballimara.

10-2-1891
MGA and his team publish a leaflet inviting Maulawi Muhammad Nadhir Husain or Maulawi Abu Muhammad Abdul Haq to a written debate. Maulawi Muhammad Nadhir Husain was roughly 88 years old. Maulawi Abu Muhammad Abdul Haq refused to have a written debate per Ahmadi sources (See Dard)

10-6-1891
On October 6th, 1891, repeating his invitation to a debate as he published another announcement the Akhbar Khair Khah Hind Press, Delhi (see Dard). Maulawi Muhammad Nadhir Husain announced that a debate would be held with MGA on a certain date. MGA was invited to the place at the time of the meeting when his house was surrounded by hundreds of angry people who were hurling abuse upon MGA from the street. Thus, MGA didn’t show up to the debate.

10-13-1891
Maulawi Muhammad Nadhir Husain seems to have published an announcement which said that his pupils, Abdul Majid and Muhammad Husain, would reply on his behalf and that MGA should address his pupils in the future (see Dard).

10-15-1891
Simulataneously, MGA agrees to debate Maulvi Muhammad Bashir Bhopali (a disciple of Nadhir Husain). The debate is scheduled to be held at MGA’s house in Delhi on 10-23-1891.

10-17-1891
MGA challenged Nadhir Husain to a decisive debate. MGA suggested October 18th, 19th or 20th for the debate and offered a reward of Rs. 25 for each Quranic verse or authentic tradition quoted by his opponents which showed that Jesus (as) was still alive in the flesh in the heavens (see Dard). MGA said that at the end of this debate, he (MGA) would pray for a decisive judgment, and he believed that the wrath of God would overtake Nadhir Husain within one year on account of his transgression in misleading the people (see Tadhkirah, and The Announcement of October 17, 1891, Majmu‘ah Ishtiharat, vol. 1, p. 249). Per Ahmadiyya sources, Nadhir Husain agreed to the debate to be held on October 20th in the Juma‘ Masjid, Delhi (See Dard).

10-20-1891
Per Ahmadiyya sources, more than 5,000 people gathered on that day in the Mosque. The
European Superintendent of the city police was himself present there with an Inspector and a police force adequate for the occasion. There was great agitation in the city. Feelings ran high and there was great tension. The 12 disciples of MGA gathered round him. Ch. Sher Muhammad, uncle to Maulawi Sher Ali, was left at the house with another friend. The 12 disciples of MGA accompanied him to the cathedral Mosque in horsedriven carriages, and there the party walked through the angry crowd straight to the mihrab and took their
seats. A little later Nadhir Husain also arrived with Muhammad Husain Batalvi and Abdul Majid.
They were seated in the adjoining veranda. It was the time of ‘Asr, all Muslims in the mosque prayed together. MGA and his disciples had did not join the prayers. Nadhir Husain declared that MGA was a Kafir, thus, a debate with him was invalid, MGA was a Kafir since he claimed prophethood and denied miracles. MGA and his team immediately denied their claim to prophethood and claimed that they believed in miracles (both lies). MGA even claimed that he believed in the Miraaj, however, he had just recently denied it in Izala Auham. MGA even had a British official make the announcement a second time. There was an uproar. The British official ordered all Muslims to leave the mosque. MGA and his group of 12 Ahmadi’s were the only ones allowed to stay. MGA and his disciples exited the mosque via the north gate, however, the carriage and driver that they had rented was gone. The superintendant of the local police also showed up. A mob scene erupted. MGA’s disciples found another carriage for hire, they escaped via British escort, Maulvi Abdul Karim traveled with MGA in the carriage and a few others, all the others walked, they were Sayyid Amir Ali Shah, Ghulam Qadir Fasih,
Muhammad Khan of Kapurthala, Hakim Fadl Din of Bhera, Pir Sirajul Haq, and six others (see Dard).

10-21-1891 and 10-22-1891
MGA wrote three letters to Maulawi Muhammad Bashir on October 21st, 22nd and 23rd
and the following points were further laid down: The debate should begin after the Friday prayers in MGA’s house. (2) Maulawi Muhammad Bashir would write the first paper. (3) Maulawi Muhammad Bashir would bring only 10 men with him. (4) Maulawi Muhammad Husain Batalvi and Maulawi Abdul Majid would not be allowed to take part. (5) Not more than five papers would be exchanged. It should be noted that it was not agreed that the papers would be
written in the meeting (See Dard).

10-23-1891
On October 23rd, 1891, MGA had another announcement published wherein he desperately tried to explain himself foe what happened at the Jama Masjid, Delhi and the lack of a proper debate, which was printed at the Iftikhar Press, Delhi. A detailed report of everything that happened was published in a supplement to the Punjab Gazette, dated November 14th (see Dard). On the same day, MGA had another debate with Maulvi Muhammad Bashir Bhopali, who was another disciple of Nadhir Husain on a Friday (see Dard).

10-28-1891
MGA abruptly leaves the debate. MGA breaks his own contract, which is a serious crime per the Quran. Only 3 arguments had been put forward by Maulvi Muhammad Bashir Bhopali and no response had been given by MGA and his team. MGA flees to Patiala wherein his father-in-law was ill, however, Mir Nasir Nawab hadn’t accepted Ahmadiyya yet. Patiala was 157 miles to the west, about halfway home towards Qadian (see Dard).

10-30-1891
On roughly this day, MGA arrives with his team in Patiala at the house of Sh. Fadl Karim (see Dard). Per Ahmadiyya sources, a local imam, Muhammad Ishaq, came to see MGA and had a talk with him on the subject of the death of Jesus.The imam destroyed MGA and spread the news in the town with the comment that MGA had been defeated. In defense, MGA issue a leaflet on October 31st in which he asked the imam to have a debate with him. He waited there till November 2nd, but the mullah did not come forward. Then MGA returned to Qadian.

11-3-1891
MGA returns to Qadian safe and sound.

12-27-1891
The first annual Jalsa in Ahmadiyya history is held at Qadian, MGA and his team had already pre-written out “Nishan Asmani” which is read out to the less than 100 Ahmadi’s who are present. In this book, MGA talks about Batalvi and Nazeer Hussain. MGA calls him Miyan Nadhir Husain (See Asmani Faisalah, page-1, online english edition). MGA mentions Miyan Nadhir Husain 22 times, he mentions, and Muhammad Husain Batalawi 29 times. Per Ahmadiyya sources, the book itself was published in the early part of 1892, by May at the latest (see Hidden Treasures).

1892–June
MGA and his team publish “Nishan Asmani”, Mian Nadhir Hussain is mentioned 9 times.

1893
MGA mentions Nadhir Hussain in his book “The Truth Revealed”, “Sachai Ka Izhar”.

1898
MGA claims that he has Nadhir Hussain sign a edict of Kufr vs. his own disciple, Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi.

1902–April
MGA publishes “”Dafi‘ul-Bala’ Wa Mi‘yaro Ahlil-Istifa”””,  English Version “””Defence Against the Plague and a Criterion for the Elect of God”””, wherein he mentions his debate with Nadhir in 1891 as well as the fact that Nadhir was the first cleric to sign his stamp of approval of MGA’s apostacy.

1902–Sep 1st
‘Tofha Golarviyyah is published. MGA mentions Nadhir Hussain.

1902–Oct
Syed Nazeer Husain died on 13 October 1902 in Delhi. MGA is happy about this and in classic fashion backdates a fake revelation. As can be seen, this wasn’t published uyntil 2 weeks after Nadhir Hussain died, however, 20 years later Mufti Muhammad Sadiq claims that MGA got the revelation on August 15th, 1902 (See Zikr-e-Habib), Mirza Bashir Ahmad also commented that the words of this ilham also point to the year* of his death (See Tadhkirah). The reference is to the al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 39, October 31, 1902, p. 7–10:

[Arabic] The leading ones will be driven to their graves.
and 


[Arabic] One who was in error has died a rebel.

1906-1907
In Haqiqatul Wahy, Nadhir Hussain is mentioned 11 times. MGA claims that he published a sign in the early versions of the Braheen e Ahmadiyya wherein Maulawi Nadhir Husain of Delhi would issue a verdict proclaiming me (MGA) a disbeliever, however, on closer research, the sign doesn’t seem to exist. In fact, the word Nadhir doesn’t exist in the first 4 volumes of the Braheen.

1908–Oct
Braheen e Ahmadiyya volume 5 is published, Nadhir Hussain is mentioned once.

Links and Related Essays
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syed_Nazeer_Husain

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-queen-of-the-princely-state-of-bhopal-invested-heavily-1878-into-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-his-braheen-they-were-disappointed-by-the-product/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/07/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-mubahila-in-1889-with-syed-muhammad-hussain-batalvi/

His works

Syed Nazeer Husain’s Fatwas were collected posthumously by some of his students into two large volumes called fatawa Naziriyya. Other written works by him include the following:

  • Mi’yar al-haq (Criterion for Truth; Urdu)
  • Waqi’at al-fatwa wa dafi’at al-balawi (Event of the Fatwa and Defence Against the Affliction; Urdu)
  • Thabut al-haq al-haqeeq (Proof of the Veritable Truth; Urdu)
  • Risalah fi tahli al-nisa bi al-dhahab (Treatise on the Adornment of Women with Gold; Urdu)
  • Al-masa’il al-arba’a (The Four Issues; Urdu)
  • Falah al-wali ba ‘itiba’ al-nabi (Felicity for the Saint in Following the Prophet; Persian)
  • Risalah fi ibtal ‘amal al-mawlid (Treatise on the Erroneousness of the Practice of Mawlid; Arabic)

“Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the man” by Muhammad Yakub Khan (1924)

Intro
We found yet another rare book in the history of Ahmadiyya.  This one comes from the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.  This specific book is called, “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the man” by Muhammad Yakub Khan (1924).  The second edition of the book seems to have been published in 1949, a few other editions were published thereafter, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s have put this book on their official website, feel free to compare and contrast.  In all editions of this book, it is clearly written that MGA was born in 1839.

The book from 1924
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad The Man

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/31/ahmad-the-messenger-of-the-latter-days-part-1-by-mirza-basheer-ud-din-mahmud-ahmad-1924/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/07/the-punjab-chiefs-1909-edition-officially-states-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-born-in-1839/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/mga-was-born-in-1839-per-the-ror-of-june-1906/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-lies-about-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1908.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/31/ahmad-the-messenger-of-the-latter-days-by-mirza-bashir-ud-din-mahmud-ahmad-1924/

Happy Birthday to You Mirza Ghulam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/14/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-swears-that-he-was-nearly-60-years-old-in-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Zikr-e-Habibhttps://theartofmisinformation.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/age-of-the-imam-mahdi-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/15/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-helped-change-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-from-1839-40-to-1835/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/mga-was-born-in-1839-per-the-ror-of-june-1906/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepel_Griffinhttps://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-punjab-chiefs-by-lepel-griffin-1890-edition-doesnt-even-mention-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/20/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-didnt-write-braheen-e-ahmadiyya-vol-5/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-punjab-chiefs-by-lepel-griffin-1890-edition-doesnt-even-mention-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1908/reviewreligionsenglish_190807.pdf

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1914/reviewreligionsenglish_191403.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/mga-was-born-in-1839-per-the-ror-of-june-1906/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranjit_Singh

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/08/the-moslem-sunrise-on-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1836-or-1837/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

“Ahmad, The Messenger of the Latter Days”, Part-1, by Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad (1924)

Intro
We found another rare Ahmadiyya book.  This is “Ahmad, The Messenger of the Latter Days, Part-1, by Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad (1924).  It was published from Qadian, but it was also available from Madras, India.  The book could also be ordered from Chicago and London.  This specific book has never been available on the alislam.org website.

The full book
Ahmad The Messenger of the Latter Days

Some brief notes
—They were so embarrassed by MGA’s dozy eyes, they were forced to edit them.

—Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad acknowledges that all Ahmadiyya documents always wrote MGA’s birth date as 1839 or 1840.

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/07/the-punjab-chiefs-1909-edition-officially-states-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-born-in-1839/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/mga-was-born-in-1839-per-the-ror-of-june-1906/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-lies-about-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1908.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/31/ahmad-the-messenger-of-the-latter-days-by-mirza-bashir-ud-din-mahmud-ahmad-1924/

Happy Birthday to You Mirza Ghulam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/14/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-swears-that-he-was-nearly-60-years-old-in-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Zikr-e-Habibhttps://theartofmisinformation.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/age-of-the-imam-mahdi-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/15/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-helped-change-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-from-1839-40-to-1835/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/mga-was-born-in-1839-per-the-ror-of-june-1906/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepel_Griffinhttps://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-punjab-chiefs-by-lepel-griffin-1890-edition-doesnt-even-mention-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/20/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-didnt-write-braheen-e-ahmadiyya-vol-5/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-punjab-chiefs-by-lepel-griffin-1890-edition-doesnt-even-mention-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1908/reviewreligionsenglish_190807.pdf

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1914/reviewreligionsenglish_191403.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/mga-was-born-in-1839-per-the-ror-of-june-1906/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranjit_Singh

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/08/the-moslem-sunrise-on-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1836-or-1837/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

 

Who is Mufti Muhammad Sadiq (1872–1957)?

Intro
Per Ahmadiyya sources only, he was born in Bhera, Pakistan on January 11, 1872(which was in British India at that time), which is roughly 100 miiles from modern day Rabwah, he died in Rabwah on January 13, 1957 at age 85.  Muhammad Sadiq was a student of Noorudin in Jammu (roughly 1880–1890).  Per Ahmadiyya sources, he was dropped off by his father (Mufti Inaytullah Qureshi Usmani) for religious training in the 1880’s, his father died before 1889, his mother, Faiz Bibi, joined Ahmadiyyat between 1896 and 1897, per Ahmadiyya sources only.  Per the order of Noorudin, he visited Qadian in later 1890 and signed the Bait form, however, he might have also been present at Ludhiana for the firs bait in 1889, since so many lies have been told about this entire event.  He would go back and forth, from his job in Jammu to Qadian quite frequently.  He was never a Mufti, this title was given to him by MGA and other Ahmadi’s, who also seem to have called his father a Mufti, which is also wrong.  In the 1920’s, they also began to call him as Dr., however, we have proved that he had posted fake degrees while he was in America, just in an attempt to fulfill a prophecy of MGA wherein it was stated Mufti Muhammad Sadiq would get degrees.

His wife and children?
Per Ahmadiyya sources, in late 1900, when Mufti Muhammad Sadiq moved to Qadian, he moved in with his 2 children and wife.  They all lived with MGA, in his inner circle, inside of MGA’s mansion.  We are unclear on when they moved out or whatever happened to these kids.

—Son, Muhammad Manzur Umar (born in roughly 1895).
—Son, Abdus Salam Umar (born in roughly 1889). See Seerat Ashab-e-Ahmad video, at the 12:45 mark).  The name of his wife is also unknown.

1880’s
His father sends him to Jammu to learn Islam from Noorudin.

Late 1890
He travels to Qadian and meets MGA with a letter from Noorudin, vouching for him.  He was working at Jammu Highschool, Noorudin helped him get this job.  He seems to have read Fath e Islam in this era, which again proves that this book was written and published in early 1890, contrary to Ahmadiyya sources.  Maulvi Abdul Kareem was also working in Jammu in those days and he also vouched for Sadiq.

1891 in Ludhiana
While MGA had his famous debates going on, Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was working as a spy on MGA’s behalf.

1895
He seems to have been in Qadian during the double eclipse during Ramadhan.  He also moved to Lahore wherein he got a job in the Office of Accountant General as a clerk, where he worked till 1901.  Nevertheless, he came to Qadian every Sunday to help with editing work.

1900-1901
He moves to Qadian, with his wife and 2 kids and begins to live exclusively with MGA, in MGA’s house.  He was also involved in writing vs. Pir Mehr Ali Shah in this era.  His room was above MGA’s, and thus he heard all the conversations in the mansion.

1902
He writes to Dowie and Piggot on behalf of MGA and issues death prophecies.

1903-1904
He traveled with MGA to his court cases.  This was the famous case of Karam Din.  It seems that MGA was denied a chair in this court case and thus, Ahmadiyya sources tell us that Mufti Muhammad Sadiq would sit on the ground and MGA would hover above him, in some weird type of way.  He was also a teacher at the Talim ul Islam Middle and High School in this era.  Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was ill in these days and was given drugs by Noorudin and MGA which has high levels of opium in them.

1905
After the Talim ul Islam School was shut down, MGA made Sadiq as the editor of the Al-Badr.  Since the old owner (Munshi Muhammad Afzal) and editor of the Badr had died (March 21st, 1905).  This was his only job.

May 1908
Ahmadiyya sources tell us that the offices of the Al-Badr newspaper were moved to Lahore, along with Noorudin and Maulvi Ahsan Amrohi.  However, Mufti Muhammad Sadiq is not mentioned.

May 28, 1908
Ahmadiyya sources tell us that Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was in Qadian and read out the announcement of Noorudin’s unanimous election as Khalifa (see Quotes from the Al-Badr, Issue of June 8, 1908, see also “Hakeem Noorudin” by Syed Hasanat Ahmad, pages 112-113).

Late-1909-1910
He was sent on a preaching tour of British-India and admitted that he didn’t openly teach that MGA was a prophet.

1912
In the Al-Badr, he wrote an essay entitled: What was the occupation of the Promised Messiah?

1913-1914
The Al-Badr newspaper is shut down by force by the British Government.  Some governmental archives show how the Al-Badr and Nur Afshan newspapers were beefing with each other and causing lots of strife, the Ahl-e-Hadis newspaper was also involved.  It seems that Mufti Muhammad Sadiq became a Christian in this era.  See here—Religious Controversy between Nur Afshan and Ahmadiyya 3

1914–March
He is totally missing from scene by 1914.

1915–1917
He seems to have been the editor of the Sadiq, which was a new and short lived newspaper (See Walter).

1917
Mufti Sadiq left for England on March 10, 1917 as a missionary. He remained involved in the propagation of Islam during his voyage. He reached London on April 17, 1917, and joined Qazi Muhammad Abdullah who was already active in spreading the message of Islam. Mufti Sadiq spent about two and a half years in England and published many tracts during his stay.

1920
Mufti Sadiq sailed from England on January 26, 1920, and reached Philadelphia in the second week of February. The immigration department blocked his entry into the U.S.A. on the grounds that he was not allowed to preach the message of God.  Sadiq set up his first headquarters in April 1920 at 1897 Madison Avenue in New York City.  On October, 1920, Dr. Sadiq moved the headquarters of the Ahmadiyya mission to Chicago because of its central location. He purchased a house in an affluent area of Chicago, at 4448 S. Wabash, and converted it to a mosque.

1921
He launches the Muslim Sunrise, a new newspaper which would be the mouthpiece of Ahmadiyya in America.  He lies and claims that there are 700,000 Ahmadi’s in the world.

1923
He left America, and returned to Qadian, British India on Sep­tember 18, 1923, and arrived in Darul Aman on December 4, 1923 in the afternoon.

1924
When the Khalifa left for the his tour of the UK, he left Mirza Bashir Ahmad and Mufti Muhammad Sadiq as in-charge.

1926
Different departments were joined together with Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya (central executive body of the Community) in 1926 and Mufti Sadiq served as Head of Foreign Affairs, and later as Head of General Affairs, sometimes supervising both divisions. He also continued to pursue writing and public speaking.  He writes and publishes the controversial book, “Zikr-e-Habeeb”, wherein many details of MGA’s life are accidentally revealed.  In this book, he also helped to change MGA’s year of birth from 1839 to 1835.

1927
He was sent to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) in 1927.  Mufti Sadiq returned to Qadian on November 6, 1927, after completing his mission in Ceylon. He then visited several cities in India (including Kinanoor Cant., Paingadi, Calicut, Bengalore, Calcutta, Brahman Barhya, Dacca, Rangpur) at the direction of Khalifatul Masih II for Tabligh purposes.

1928
he visited Ka­rachi and Calcutta. He traveled to Sri Lanka once again to introduce the teachings of True Islam.

1934
He was sent to the tomb of Yuz Asaf and wrote a book about it.

1935
He became Private Secretary to Khalifatul Masih II in 1935.  He conducted the Nikah ceremony of Khalifatul Masih II with Syedah Maryam Siddiqa on September 30, 1935, and delivered a faith-inspiring address at the time.

1937
He retired himself from the day-to-day duties of Sadr Anjuman in 1937 because of ill health but continued to render religious services as usual.

1947
He migrated to Lahore from Qadian with the Khalifa and then later to Rawbah.

1952
He is sent to Africa by the Khalifa for management and preaching.  He was in Sierra Leone and was sent to Liberia to officially start the Ahmadiyya mission there.

1957
He passed away on January 13, 1957. Khalifatul Masih II led the Namaz-i-Janaza (Funeral Prayer) of this devotee of the Promised Messiah. He was buried in Bahishti Maqbara, Rabwah, Pakistan.

Links and Related Essays
https://www.alislam.org/book/hakeem-noor-ud-deen/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/02/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-was-a-student-of-noorudin-pre-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/17/ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-the-first-bait-ceremony-in-1889/

http://wiki.qern.org/mirza-ghulam-ahmad/biography/followers/mufti-muhammad-sadiq

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhera

https://www.alislam.org/v/6101.html

https://www.alislam.org/v/30.html

Mufti Muhammad Sadiq r.a. – An Early Ray of Western Sunrise

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karam+Din

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/06/the-life-and-death-of-maulvi-abdul-karim-sialkoti/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/10/what-is-the-talim-ul-islam-high-school-college-at-qadian-and-later-at-rabwah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/05/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-travelled-to-the-tomb-of-yuz-asaf-in-1934/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/06/zikr-e-habib-by-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-1936/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/15/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-helped-change-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-from-1839-40-to-1835/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/24/what-was-the-occupation-of-the-promised-messiah-by-mufti-muhammad-sadiq/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/23/in-1891-when-mga-made-his-big-claims-he-denied-prophethood-mufti-sadiq-was-heavily-involved/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/31/in-1921-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-claimed-that-there-were-700000-ahmadis-in-the-world/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/11/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-frequented-british-opera-houses-in-the-punjab-per-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-his-companion/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/23/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-was-drugged-by-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

  1.  Elijah Muhammad and Islam By Herbert Berg pg. 18
  2. ^ Islam in the African-American Experience By Richard Brent Turner pg.124-5, 130
  3. ^ We are All Moors: Ending Centuries of Crusades Against Muslims and Others By Anouar Majid pg 81
  4. ^ Islam in the African-American Experience By Richard Brent Turner pg.116
  5. ^ Elijah Muhammad and Islam By Herbert Berg pg. 19
  6. ^ Islam in the African-American Experience By Richard Brent Turner pg.121Tags
    #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

“Eye witness account of sahibzada Abdul Latif” by Syed Ahmad Noor Kabuli (1921)

Intro
One of my “Ahmadiyya-Research-Team” friends in the UK recently found a book titled “Shaheed Marhoom Ke Chashm deed waqiat” Part 1 and 2, (Eye witness account of sahibzada Abdul Latif”). This book is written by his beloved student, Syed Ahmad Noor Kabuli, who also took Baiyat of MGA and subsequently claimed himself to be a prophet. The plain reading of book gives us an impression that Abdul Latif was not mentally sound person.  This Syed Ahmad Noor Kabuli eventually claimed prophethood and was most likely ex-communicated by the Khalifa.  Syed Ahmad Noor Kabuli admitted that he was drinking the water dripping from mirza ghulam coffin.  Apparently, as MGA’s coffin was being transported from Ahmadiyya buildings in Lahore to the train station, Ahmadi’s had put ice in MGA’s coffin to keep his body from smelling and etc.  As Ahmadi’s were escorting the coffin of MGA through the streets of Lahore, many people began throwing feces at the motorcade, it was a huge scene.  Syed Ahmad Noor Kabuli still drank the ice water that was oozing out of MGA’s coffin.  This book was published on December 26th, 1921.

Everyone in British-India wrote that MGA died of cholera
It is important to note that MGA even said that he thought he had cholera, as reported by his father-in-law, Mir Nasir Nawab.  Many newspapers and independent researchers wrote the same.  Noorudin, the new Khalifa was faced with this issue early on and told Ahmadi’s that even if MGA did die of cholera, death by cholera was considered martydom in his version of Islam.

Some additional data on Syed Abdul Latif
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/11/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-terrible-arabic-pronunciation-and-syed-abdul-latif/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/11/syed-abdul-latif-accompanied-mga-to-jhelum-in-january-of-1903/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/26/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-called-the-killing-of-maulvi-abdul-latif-as-greater-then-that-of-imam-hussain/

 

Here is the summary of this short book, written by a friend

“Abdul Latif lived in a village called Syedgah near Khost Afganistan. He was a friend of governor of the area who pays him remuneration for livelihood. Amir of Kabul has also fixed his remuneration at Rs 1100/- He had 4 wives and 18 children.

He was a negotiator on behalf of Amir e Kabul to decide borders of afghanistan with the British. When he was busy in negotiations with Britishers some one gave him a book of MGA. He was very happy to receive this book and offered reward to the doner of book. He read and liked the book and told his colleague that this is the man whom the world was waiting for. Now he has come.

At first, Molvi Abdul Latif thought Allah would select him for the job of reformer because there was none like him, but now after reading MGA’s book he come to know that god has sent the reformer. He then sent some of his students to Qadian to see the Masih e Moud as to who and how is he? Some student after visiting MGA in Qadian cast doubts on him but abdul latif said you are wrong in your doubts, this man is a true Masih. Then he sent Molvi Abdul Rehman his close friend, to MGA with gifts, dresses and Baiyat letter. Abdul Rehman stayed in Qadian and returned with MGA’s book for Mullah Abdul Latif.

After two or three months Abdul Latif sought permission from Amir e Kabul for Hajj. Amir e Kabul has been pleased to allow and gifted him many horses, camels and cash for Hajj expenditures. Instead of going to Makkah, he reached Qadian via Khost and Bannu. He stayed there for many months. He used to go on walk with Masih e Moud, and do not remove dust from his cloths till Hazrat sb (MGA) does so.

He received many ilham. Once while he was sleeping in guest room, suddenly got up and said Muhammad s.a.w. has been laid over me like a fabric sheet and has entered into me in such way that he s.a.w. can not be separated from me and then he received ilham meaning His s.a.w. body is of Noor, fragrance like pearl and this noor is under my control. (Nauzubillah).

Once while coming back from walk Molvi Abdul latif said to me (the author ANK), have you seen your father coming behind you. I said he had died long ago. He said no he was there. Once after walk he came to us and told that a Beautifully dressed HOOR from Jannah came to me and said have a look on me, I said no I would not look to you till Masih e Moud is before me. The author (ANK) claims that he had some ahmadi JIN in his possession, when he was imprisoned, these Ahmadi JINN offered him to destroy the city of Kabul for his release from Jail but he did not accept their offer.

His six months leave was over and he started preparation to leave for Kabul. When he left Qadian, hazrat sb (MGA) accompanied him about 1.5 miles. While parting, Molvi Abdul Latif fell on MGA’s feet and holding on to his feet, started crying and saying pray for me. Hazrat sb said ok I will pray for you but leave my feet first. Molvi Abdul Latif said no He would not leave the feet. Hazrat sb said this is my order and order is above the respect. Then he released the feet of Hazrat sb.

On way to Kabul few Chakralvi came to talk to him of MGA he said he is Ahmadi. But he calls himself Ghulam Ahmad the chakralvi replied. Molvi Abdul Latif said don’t call him Ghulam Ahmad because if you call him Ghulam Ahmed then he would become Syed and meaning Chief and chief is the servant of his tribe.

He said god has made the person of Muhammad Arabi s.a.w. And Ahmad Qadiani one and the same (Nauzubillah) so I swear upon god in whose hand is my soul I saw Muhammad and Ahmad in one person. (Nauzubillah) then he said he has destroyed himself so much in Masih e maoud that my person and person of Muhammad has become same and that the person of Muhammad has become inseparable from mine. (Nauzubillah).

He came back to Khost and started Tabligh of ahmadiyyat, wrote many letters to eminent peoples of area. The news reached Amir of Kabul who put up the case before Ulema. He was offered to repent which he denied and said he want it to be finished soon. So he was sentenced stoning to death. While few stones were pelted on him he was again offered to repent but he refused it again.

He was stoned in a hindoo cremation area, His dead body was recovered by the author and buried in a graveyard inside Kabul. But because of Shirk related gatherings at his grave the government removed the body remnants from there and were disposed of in a river.

The scans

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/11/syed-abdul-latif-accompanied-mga-to-jhelum-in-january-of-1903/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/11/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-terrible-arabic-pronunciation-and-syed-abdul-lateef/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karamhttps://www.alislam.org/library/books/The-Afghan-Martyrs-by-B.A.Rafiq.pdf

https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1154&context=afghanuno

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/06/13/new-data-found-on-the-death-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-via-cholera-from-june-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/20/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-cholera-new-evidence-found-in-aug-2017-the-vakil-newspaper-amritsar-dated-30th-may-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/03/farquhar-claims-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-cholera/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/02/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-an-opium-overdose-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/15/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-helped-change-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-from-1839-40-to-1835/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/mga-was-born-in-1839-per-the-ror-of-june-1906/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-lies-about-the-date-of-birth-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1908.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/31/ahmad-the-messenger-of-the-latter-days-by-mirza-bashir-ud-din-mahmud-ahmad-1924/

Happy Birthday to You Mirza Ghulam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/14/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-swears-that-he-was-nearly-60-years-old-in-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Zikr-e-Habib

https://theartofmisinformation.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/age-of-the-imam-mahdi-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/03/farquhar-claims-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-cholera/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/05/27/walter-was-told-by-ahmadiyya-leadership-that-mga-died-of-intestinal-trouble-1917-1918/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/05/25/ahmadiyya-leadership-never-gave-a-cause-of-death-for-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/02/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-died-of-an-opium-overdose-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/20/mirza-tahir-ahmad-authenticated-the-book-hyat-e-nasir-1927/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/12/maulana-abu-kalamazad-was-the-editor-of-the-vakil-in-1908-when-mga-died/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=cholera

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/16/was-maulana-abu-kalamazad-the-editor-of-the-vakil-in-1908-and-his-relationship-with-ahmadis/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Up ↑