ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Nowadays, you will see Ahmadi’s on social media claiming that Aisha was 19 years old when she was married to Muhammad (saw). In 1894, MGA confessed that Aisha (ra) was 9 years old at time of marriage. However, back in 1920, the sons of MGA told the world something totally different. Mirza Bashir Ahmad wrote many articles in Ahmadiyya newspapers, his book about the life of Muhammad (saw) appeared in 1919, mostly in the Urdu version of the ROR, those essay’s were turned into book form in 2011 by Mirza Masroor Ahmad. In Volume 2 of the book series, Mirza Bashir Ahmad goes on to argue that Ā’ishah was 7 years old when the marriage to Muhammad (saw) was announced (see volume 2, page 238). However, she didn’t enter the house of Muhammad (saw) until 3-5 years later when she was 9-12. However, he forgets that Muhammad’s first wife Khadija (ra) died in year 10 before Hijra. Muhammad’s marriage to Ā’ishah was announced soon thereafter (a few weeks). Thus we have a major contradiction in Mirza Bashir Ahmad’s theory. Nevertheless, he goes on to totally disagree with the idea that Ā’ishah was 14 or 16 at the time of marriage. On page 246, he goes on to argue that girls in hotter climates fully mature by age 10, and girls in colder climates take longer to mature.

This was also covered in the November-December edition of 1929 ROR. This is also related to the famous Sarda Act. The ROR of July-1932 argued that Aisha could not have been over the age of 9 at the time of marriage. The Sarda Act is mentioned by the 2nd Khalifa in the ROR of Dec-1932. The ROR of June-1938 has an essay on the age of Aisha and etc, no writer is given. The article argues that Aisha (ra) was 6-7 at the time of nikkah and explains how this is the unanimous view, it then argues that she was 12 at consummation.

By the 1950’s, Ahmadi-Mullahs found the need to deny the hadith from Bukhari. Continue reading “Mirza Bashir Ahmad (a son of MGA) wrote (in 1920) that Aisha was 7 years old when she married Muhammad (Saw)” →

Intro
Dear readers, we have recently found some references from MGA in terms of the age of Aisha at her marriage and that of child marriage in general. We are searching for additional quotes. MGA mentioned the marriage of Aisha (ra) in depth in Arya Dharam (1895) and Nurul-Qur’an (Number II)(1895). The Sarda Act is mentioned by the 2nd Khalifa in the ROR of Dec-1932. The ROR of June-1938 has an essay on the age of Aisha and etc, no writer is given. The article argues that Aisha (ra) was 6-7 at the time of nikkah and explains how this is the unanimous view, it then argues that she was 12 at consummation.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on Aisha (ra) and child marriage” →

Intro
MGA was married at a very young age, 12-13, his sons were also married off very young, in fact, in a farming economy, this is the norm. However, in the 21st century, this norm has been abandoned. In 1894, MGA confessed that Aisha (ra) was 9 years old at time of marriage. Many Muslims have argued that the norms of farming economies don’t need to be followed, in fact, almost all Muslim countries don’t allow anyone to be married under the age of 16 by 2017. Mirza Bashir Ahmad (a son of MGA) wrote (in 1920) that Aisha was 7 years old when she married Muhammad (Saw). This was also covered in the November-December edition of 1929 ROR. This is also related to the famous Sarda Act. The ROR of July-1932 argued that Aisha could not have been over the age of 9 at the time of marriage. The Sarda Act is mentioned by the 2nd Khalifa in the ROR of Dec-1932. The ROR of June-1938 has an essay on the age of Aisha and etc, no writer is given. The article argues that Aisha (ra) was 6-7 at the time of nikkah and explains how this is the unanimous view, it then argues that she was 12 at consummation.

However, Ahmadis have always been changing their position on many islamic issues, and then they lie about it. With the case of the Age of Aisha at marriage, we have the same situation. Since at least the 1950’s, Ahmadiyya sources have been telling us that Aisha was 19 when she got married to Muhammad (saw), however, previous Ahmadiyya sources argued that she was 12. When we present this info to ahmadis, they refuse to answer, then they cry persecution.
Continue reading “Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, the Ahmadi Khalifa claims that child marriage is OK in the 21st century and Aisha was 12” →

Intro
This entire entry is taken from Farhan Khan’s book on Ahmadiyya—With Love to the Ahmadi’s of the World by Farhan Khan (2010).

After 1915, the 2nd Khalifa of Ahmadiyya began creating false arguments in his attempt to substantiate the prophethood of his father, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.  Mirza Mahmud Ahmad (the caliph), twisted many writings of Ibn Arabi and many other hadith, as he lied about the possibility of additional prophets. Mahmud Ahmad mentioned this false argument in 1915 and then later in 1922-ish.

Muhammad Ali refuted all of the new arguments of Mahmud Ahmad in 1915, he published 2-3 books on the topic in that year. “Last Prophet” and “Prophethood in Islam” are some good ones that prove the lies of Mahmud Ahmad. The ROR of Sep-1935 gave the same line of argumentation. The Sarda Act is mentioned by the 2nd Khalifa in the ROR of Dec-1932.
Continue reading “Ahmadis lie about the Aisha hadith, in terms of the end of prophets” →

Intro
Imam Bayhaqi tells us that when Tabarani said that Eisa (as) will live up til the age of 120, he meant on his second coming (See Dala’il al-Nubuwwah [The Signs of Prophethood], page 166)(See the scan in the below). Thus, the Qadianis are caught again red-handed telling lies and misrepresenting authors.

In 1891, when MGA made his wild claims, he was also asserting that Esa (As) died at roughly age 33 and was buried somewhere. About a year later, in 1892, MGA began to say that Esa (As) lived to age 120 and indirectly quoted the saying of Aisha, which was also recorded in Kanzul Ummul (See Nishan Asmani, page 19)(MGA was quoting Tabrani [spelled as Tibrani] and Al-Hakam). In 1895, via Satt Bachan (we don’t have the original edition), MGA quotes Tabarani and claims that Eisa (as) was the travelling prophet and lived 87 years after the event of crucifixtion (up to age 120-125).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was academically dishonest, since he quoted Tabarani, and said that Eisa (as) already died at 120-125” →

Intro
In Arabic language both terms (al-Wahy الوحي and al-Ilhaam الإلهام) have a slight difference and can also be synonyms according the context.

Continue reading “Differences between ilham and Wahi” →

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad didn’t know that even Muhammad’s (saw) skin color was described sometimes as reddish and sometimes as brown-ish-white-ish. Or, he knew and purposely lied to the masses that Eisa (as) son of Maryam is 2 people because his skin color was described as reddish by some reports and brown-ish in other reports.

The Arabs don’t say a man is white [or: ‘white man,’ rajul abya∙] due to a white complexion. Rather, whiteness [al-abyad] with them means an external appearance that is free from blemish [al-zahir al-naqi min al-uyub]; when they mean a white complexion they say ‘red’ (ahmar)… when the Arabs say, ‘so-and-so is white (abyad – bayda), they [only] mean a noble character (al-karam fi l-akhlaq), not skin color. It is when they say ‘so-and-so is red’ (ahmar- hamra) that they mean white skin. And the Arabs attribute white skin to the slaves.” (See Lisan al-Arab, the well-known Arabic dictionary by Ibn Manzur).

Continue reading “Even Muhammad’s (saw) skin color was described sometimes as reddish and sometimes as brown-ish” →

Intro
Razi has been raging about my appearance on the Dawah Wise youtube channel. Below are his tweets wherein he says I am non-Muslim, and remember, Ahmadi’s claim persecution on the same topic, i.e., being declared as non-Muslim.

Further, I asked Adnan about his comments on “Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya”, he has created a clip on his twitter channel herein. A longer clip can be found herein on Adnan Rashid’s youtube channel.

Continue reading “In a rage of jealousy, Razi does Takfir of #Ahmadiyyafactcheckblog” →

Intro
In 1895, MGA and his team of writers decided to start a quarterly journal and named it “Nurul-Qur’an” (The Light of the Holy Qur’an). The first number was issued on and covered the time frame of June, July, and August of 1895. It was published in June of 1895 (see Dard) from The Diya’ul-Islam Press, Qadian. The second number was published in Dec-1895, it was discontinued altogether after this.

This book is barely 50 pages. It starts off with 4 pages of “Guidance”, this seems to be material for an entirely different idea, nevertheless, MGA and his team added it to this magazine as filler. Those 4 pages are followed by MGA’s arguments in the Barahin 1–4. 22 pages from Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya, which is extremely odd. It is followed with a long footnote wherein Reverend Pfander, John Davenport, Reverend Bosworth, Thakar Das and Bishop Taylor are mentioned, this footnote is 16 pages. Another footnote follows, 11 pages, Reverend Pfander in his book Mizan ul Haqq, and researcher Davenport in his book, and Padre James Cameron Lace are mentioned. It also contains the announcement of MGA’s book, “Minanur-Rahman” (5 pages), wherein MGA was claiming that Mecca was the oldest habitation on earth and that in the beginning men were all of one colour and spoke the same language, which was Arabic. “Minanur-Rahman” was never published in MGA’s life and was published posthumously in 1922. MGA also discusses the age of Aisha (ra), MGA argued that there was nothing wrong with girl getting married at 7-9 years old. He did however, doubt the authenticity of a specific hadith which listed Aisha (ra) as 9 years old at the time of marriage. In 1920, Mirza Bashir Ahmad (a son of MGA) wrote that Aisha was 7 years old when she married Muhammad (Saw). The 2nd Khalifa (Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad) said that child marriage is OK in the 21st century and Aisha was 12.

The book
5 pages—-announcement for the publishing of Minanur-Rahman.
22 pages—- from Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya
16 page footnote
11 page footnote

54 pages.

Continue reading “Nurul-Qur’an, Number-1, quotes and background data” →