Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"editing"

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad walked around Qadian at times with 10-15 ladies and another case of Ahmadiyya editing

Intro
As we all know, MGA enjoyed the company of men and women in private quarters and always got the Punjabee styled massages from both genders.  In the 1930’s, the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad admitted that his father was a bon-vivant and thus so was he.  Ahmadi’s would happily send their daughters to Qadian to massage MGA and were even willing to do it themselves.  In 1907, MGA’s son who was soon-to-be the Promised Son had an incident wherein he was harrassing some of the local women in Qadian, MGA was forced to have a commission formed and had these allegations investigated, however, it was a fake investigation and MGA’s son was acquitted by other fanatical Ahmadi’s who were willing to absolve the Mirza family and all of their discretions, even Noorudni bowed out of this commission.  Nevertheless, we have produced 3 versions of a story from the life of MGA wherein he would walk around Qadian with 10-15 women as normal.  Ahmadiyya editors purposely omitted the part about the number of women that MGA would surround himself with, and thus have proven that they are full of deception.

The Urdu version of Tadhkirah tells us
English translation:
“”””Aleha Bibi Sahiba, wife of Qazi Abdul Rahim, states that once Huzur (MGAQ) was passing through Hindu’s Bazaar as they  went toward north for a walk, close to athe place where Molvi Sher Ali resides now a days.   Huzur  (MGA) was accompanied by about 10 – 15 ladies (“HUM DAS PANDRA AURTEN HUZUR K HAMRAH THE”). While returning to home through this Hindu’s Bazar, huzur stopped near a well beside Masjid Aqsa, pegged his stick on ground at a place and said this would be Ahmadi Bazar soon and there would be Ahmadis all around. ( Urdu TAZKIRAH PAGE 694).

The scan work

But the 2004 edition of Tadhkirah omits the 10-15 girls part

“””Translation: (87) On one occasion in passing through the bazaar, the Promised Messiah stopped near the well in the bazaar to the north of the big mosque and said: This will soon be called: Ahmadi Bazaar; and will be owned by the Ahmadis.””” (Ashab Ahmad, Vol. VI, pp. 123-124)(See Also the 2004 edition of Tadhkirah, page 969).

And then the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah omits the 10-15 girls part

“””(87) (Salihah Bibira wife of Qadi ‘Abdur-Rahimra narrates that):

Once during the morning walk while passing through the bazaar of the Hindus, which is called the Bigger Bazar now, but was small at that time, the Promised Messiahas stopped near the well in the bazaar to the north of the big mosque near the House of Maulavi Sher ‘Ali. About ten to fifteen of us women were with him. On his return he stopped in the same bazaar near the well at the crossing to the north of the Bigger Mosque and pointing at a point on the earth with his staff he said: This will soon be called: Ahmadi Bazar; and there will be many many Ahmadis
here. “”“[Ashab-e-Ahmad, vol. 6, pp. 123–124](See also the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1091).

The key urdu words that they missed
“HUM DAS PANDRA AURTEN HUZUR K HAMRAH THE”

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/23/mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-had-20-children-with-7-wives/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/26/judgement-of-mr-g-d-khoslas-session-judge-gurdaspur-india-6-june-1935-syed-attaullah-shah-bokhari-appeal-case/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-accused-of-immoral-behavior-at-qadian-1938-he-calls-it-normal/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/15/in-qadian-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-allowed-to-touch-all-women/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/11/26/mirza-ghulam-loved-to-have-multiple-women-on-his-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/21/ahmadis-would-send-their-daughters-to-qadian-to-serve-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-at-night/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/09/who-is-dr-abdus-sattar-shah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-needed-toilet-attendants-his-entire-life/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/26/fauzia-faizi-confirms-that-the-mirza-family-is-full-of-incest-and-rapists/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/25/was-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-wife-a-concubine-aka-laundi-of-noorudin/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-had-an-obsession-with-young-women/

Tags
#metoo #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian #metoomovement

Maulvi Sher Ali told the world that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad would send his Arabic writings to Noorudin and Ahsan Amrohi for editing

Intro
MGA hired many people to help him.  Noorudin was the most famous, as was Maulvi Syed Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi.

Summary, Seertul Mahdi Quotation number 104 Book By By Mirza basheer M.A .
Molvi sher Ali sahb says that Mirza Qadyani calls his arabic writings sort of revelation but Mirza use to get his Arabic revelation checked and corrected from First khalifa ( Hakeem Nooruddin) and Molvi Mohammad Ahsan and get them rectified. After Rectification they use to return it back.

Seertul Mahdi Quotation number 104 Book By By Mirza basheer M.A .

Scan

Additional Links and related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Noorudin

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Amrohi

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=arabic

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/06/hani-tahir-exposes-ahmadiyya-lies-again-the-arabic-of-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=ghost+writers

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=right+arm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/lecture-ludhiana-was-not-a-lecture-it-was-a-riot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/12/the-story-of-how-mga-hurt-his-right-arm-and-was-disabled-since-his-youth/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-needed-toilet-attendants-his-entire-life/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/15/who-is-mirza-ghulam-murtaza-1791-1876/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/13/mirza-sultan-ahmad-mgas-eldest-son/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/mga-used-scribes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-admitted-that-mga-used-lots-of-editors-and-ghost-writers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=ghost+writers

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/04/ahmadiyya-mullahs-have-been-caught-editing-the-writings-of-mga-yet-again/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/04/maulvi-sher-ali-told-the-world-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-would-send-his-arabic-writings-to-noorudin-and-ahsan-amrohi-for-editing/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Noorudin

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Amrohi

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=arabic

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/06/hani-tahir-exposes-ahmadiyya-lies-again-the-arabic-of-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/was-noorudin-the-ghost-writer-of-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/mgas-ghost-writers-argue-on-the-prophethood-of-mga-in-1900/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-muqamat-al-hariri/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/02/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-was-a-student-of-noorudin-pre-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/13/life-sketch-of-maulvi-syed-muhammad-ahsan-amrohi-2/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/hope/2007/hope200712_lifesketchsyedmuhammadahsanamrohi.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/04/maulvi-sher-ali-told-the-world-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-would-send-his-arabic-writings-to-noorudin-and-ahsan-amrohi-for-editing/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/maulvi-abdul-kareem-claims-prophethood-per-mga-maulvi-amrohi-disagrees/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/08/01/prophethood-among-the-followers-of-muhammad-by-maulana-sayyid-muhammad-ahsan-of-amroha-oct-1913-in-tashhizul-azhan/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/ahmadiyya-leadership-published-books-by-maulana-sayyid-muhammad-ahsan-of-amroha-on-30th-may-1907-see-al-badr/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-admitted-that-mga-used-lots-of-editors-and-ghost-writers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/27/maulvi-abdul-kareem-lived-exclusively-with-mga-on-the-3rd-floor-of-mgas-house/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/27/muhammad-ali-lived-exclusively-within-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-house-for-almost-10-years-1899-1909/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/16/dr-mir-muhammad-ismail-mgas-brother-in-law-lies-about-mga-leading-salaat/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/05/20/an-ahmadi-claimed-prophethood-in-late-1901-or-early-1902-and-was-boycotted-by-ahmadis-chiragh-din-of-jammu-jamooni/

Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

 

Ahmadiyya leadership is always editing books on Ahmadiyya and MGA’s so-called ilhams

Intro
My team and I have found countless instances of academic dishonesty by Ahmadiyya leadership.  This is the proof that Ahmadiyya is a business, and their mullahs know fully about the fraud of Ahmadiyya, they are shareholders and thus remain quiet, they will never tell on their masters, i.e., the Mirza family.  If they did ever tell, they would be out of a job and homeless.  In the below, I have shown how MGA had a sick and vile “fake-ilham” about his cousin (his brother in village terms) and his wife.  MGA hated his cousin so much, he openly cursed his wife, who would be considered MGA’s sister (in village environment).  Further, this woman that he is calling a prostitute, she eventually became the great grandmother of Mirza Tahir Ahmad‘s wife.  Mirza Tahir ahmad married her in 1957.  Her name was Asifa Begum, she died in 1992.

Mirza Imam Din was dead by 1904, this ilham was 1906
It’s important to note, Mirza imam ud din died in 1904, his widow was still alive and still lived in Qadian, MGA still attacked her and hated her with a passion.   Later on, Ahmadiyya leadership forged many documents to prove that she converted to Ahmadiyya.  However this is most likely a lie.

Who was Asifa Begum?
She was mother of Khursheed Begum who was Daughter in law of MGAQ and wife of Mirza Sultan.

The Mirza Tahir Ahmad connection?
“”””On 14 October 1957, Hadhrat Sahibzada Mirza Tahir Ahmad Sahib returned to Pakistan and on 5 December 1957, his Nikah was announced with Hadhrat Syeda Asifa Begum Sahiba, the daughter of Amatul Salam Sahiba and Sahibzada Mirza Rashid Ahmad Sahib.”””

See—https://www.alislam.org/library/periodicals/tariq-uk/chapter2.pdf

Page 22

Download it here: The life of Mirza Tahir Ahmad

Tadhkirah, 2004 online english edition, MGA called his cousins wife as a Hooker

“On Monday morning I saw in my dream that Imamud Din’s wife, who had been a prostitute, had fallen down.” (Diary of the Promised Messiah p. 12).  Quoted in Tadhkirah, 2004 online edition.

Tadhkirah, 2004 online english edition, MGA called his cousins wife as a Hooker–SCAN

Previous editions of Urdu Tadhkirah, showing the quotes

Read my additional entries on Ahmadis editing the writings of MGA
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=editing

What is the Diary of MGA?
I haave found references to this diary as early as the 1915-era, as the newly crowned Khalifa, Mirza Bashir-uddin Mahmud Ahmad quoting it vs. the Lahori ceders.  However, it seemed to have magically appeared to the Khalifa, it was missing for many years.  It is most likely a fraud, concocted by the family of MGA.

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/24/mirza-imam-din-the-cousin-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/13/mirza-sultan-ahmad-mgas-eldest-son/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/06/the-grandson-of-mirza-aziz-ahmad-has-died/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/who-is-mirza-aziz-ahmad-the-eldest-grandson-of-mga-the-son-of-mirza-sultan-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Muhammadi+Begum

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/26/ahmadiyya-leadership-is-always-editing-books-on-ahmadiyya-and-mgas-so-called-ilhams/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/09/what-is-chuhra-mela/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/07/the-punjab-chiefs-1909-edition-officially-states-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-born-in-1839/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/13/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-not-allowed-to-teach-his-eldest-sons/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/mga-was-born-in-1839-per-the-ror-of-june-1906/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/09/who-is-mirza-ghulam-muhi-ud-din-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-paternal-uncle-died-in-1866/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2016/11/24/the-sweepers-of-qadian-1886/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/13/who-is-mirza-ghulam-qadir-1833-1883/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/11/who-is-mirza-nizam-ud-din-1845-the-first-cousin-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Ahmadis editing their books on Piggot

Intro
This video which was made by Akber and AK describes how Ahmadis have been editing their books for years and years and years.  In his video, it is proved that Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyya was tampered with after 2010.  Akber and AK Shaikh had referred to this book of history, specifically on questions 409-412.  Question 412 in this edition of Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyya was about Piggot.  The writer of Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyya was the famous Ahmadi Dost Muhammad Shah Sahib, he wrote that Piggot had repented (roughly 1907) and never claimed godhood ever again, then he died in the lifetime of MGA in a disgraceful manner.  After 2014, this specific sentence was deleted.

Scan from the 2011 edition 

Scan from the 2014 edition

Scan from alteration date on the Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyya PDF

The PDF date was altered after 2014
The original PDF was created by the Ahmadiyya Jamaat (of this specific edition of Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyya) in 2011, however, it was altered in 2014.

The video
https://youtu.be/_v2B_07PIxA

akber

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/in-1907-ahmadiyya-newspapers-were-still-asserting-that-piggot-would-die-before-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/04/piggot-was-mentioned-by-the-ahmadiyya-newspaper-review-of-religions-in-1903/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/26/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-initial-writings-to-piggot-in-1902/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1911.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/20/dear-ahmadiyya-but-dr-alexander-dowie-changed-his-claims-after-mgas-death-challenge/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/abdullah-athim-never-repented-ahmadiyya-leadership-lied/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/fate-of-a-false-prophet-by-syed-hasanat-ahmad-the-review-of-religions-august-1984/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/16/ahmadiyya-leadership-has-been-caught-red-handed-as-they-lied-about-dr-schweisos-comments-on-piggot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-wrote-that-piggot-would-not-repent/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/22/piggot-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-the-scan-work-live-from-the-discussion-forum-on-ahmadiyya-on-fb/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/24/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-wrote-to-piggot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/17/ahmadis-editing-their-books-on-piggot/

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/5593/rev-john-hugh-smyth-pigott-his-claim-prophecy-and-end/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam #atifmian #piggot #Agapemone #pigott

 

Hani Tahir catches Ahmadi-clerics/employees editing the writings of MGA

Intro
As we all know, Hani Tahir recently left Ahmadiyya and began a string of videos wherein he exposes how Ahmadi-Mullahs have been lying for the past 100+ years.  There was a video wherein he found an Ahmadi (a co-worker of his) that purposely erased a portion of a prophecy by MGA.

Which Prophecy?
Its from 1905, MGA was claiming that an Earthquake would occur that was similar to the final Earthquake before judgement day as described in the Quran.  In the original prophecy, it was written that this prophecy would indeed happen during MGA’s lifetime, however, since it didn’t happen, his editing team began working on a solution.  They simply erased the portion that mentioned, “in my lifetime” and then added it to tadkhirah in 1935 and all proceeding editions.

hanitahir

Here is the full video by Hani Tahir

Conclusions
Ahmadis have been editing and adding and erasing to the work of MGA for years and years and years.  See my other essays here for more on the topic. 

MGA’s failure to speak at the Aligarh College in April-May of 1889

Intro
As we all know, MGA never gave any public lectures in his whole life, before 1889 or after.  MGA always had a follower of his read out these ready made speeches, which were written by MGA’s team of writers.  The main reason that MGA never did public speeches or Friday Sermons or etc was because he spoke with a terrible stutter.  In fact, MGA’s team went out of their way to fabricate speeches that MGA might have given, like Khutba Ilhamia and other talks at the annual Jalsa’s at Qadian.  Even before Khutbah Ilhamia, MGA never led any Eid prayer, he would simply get up to speak and say a few words after the main speech, see MGA’s Eid of 1888.  Nevertheless, after accepting Bait’s from his followers in March of 1889, MGA immediately traveled to Aligarh and was scheduled to give a speech to many Professor’s, Sir Syed would also be in attendance.  However, after MGA arrived in Aligarh, he never came out of his apartment for daily prayers, then, just a few hours before his speech, he declined and abruptly left for Qadian.  This was before Noorudin and Maulvi Abdul Karim had began giving speeches on MGA’s behalf.  They had just taken his Bait however.  Mir Abbas Ali Ludhianvi, Maulvi Abdullah Sanori and Sheikh Hamid Ali accompanied him on this journey (see Mujadid-e-Azim, page 278).  MGA stayed in Aligarh for just a week, after which he returned to Ludhiana. In Aligarh, he was the guest of Tafazul Hussain, Tehsildar, who was at the time serving as the Superintendent of the Deputy Commissioner’s office. There were a couple of report-worthy incidents in Aligarh (IBID).  The name of the speech was supposed to be “The Truth of Islam”.

1890, MGA’s account of this event in Fath-e-Islam
“”””Once I had the occasion to travel to Aligarh at a time when my mind was tired. I had also suffered from this weakness some time earlier in Qadian and I was not in a fit condition
to carry on long conversations or to undertake any intellectual effort…. In Aligarh, while I was in this condition, a Maulavi of the name of Muhammad Isma‘il came to see me and humbly requested me to deliver a sermon…. I accepted his request with pleasure and had in mind to speak in regular public about the essence of Islam…But thereafter God the Almighty dissuaded me from this effort. 

I am sure that as I was not in good health, God the Almighty did not desire that I should suffer some ill consequence from making an intellectual effort and that is why He stopped me from delivering the sermon. On a previous occasion, I had a similar experience.

While I was physically in a weak condition, I saw one of the past Prophets in a vision and he said to me with sympathy and goodwill, ‘Why do you do such hard mental work; if you continue, you will fall ill.’”””” [Fat-he Islam, pp. 27–28 footnote, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 3, pp. 17–18](see also, the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, pages, 219-219).

Sir Syed Ahmad Khan then makes fun of MGA
See Dard, pages 215-216, footnotes:

“”””Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan also made Ahmadas the target of his ridicule in his vanity and conceit. He offered to become his disciple and then go to Hyderabad where Ahmadas should show some of his false miracles and he would go round singing his praises. Then the State in its simplicity would give Rs. 10,000 out of which Sir Sayyid would have two-thirds and onethird
would be Ahmad’sas.

It is curious indeed to note here that Sir Sayyid was later on stricken
with sorrow and grief when he and his college suffered a loss of Rs. 1,05,490/- through Sham Bihari Lal. The shock nearly killed him. When Ahmadas knew from God that Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan was approaching death he invited him to accept the truth by means of an Ishtihar dated
March 12th, 1897, but the world was too much with him. He had even discontinued offering the Salat and observing the fasts.”””

Who was Maulvi Muhammad Ismael?
MGA and other Ahmadiyya sources tell us that MGA was in Aligarh already when this Muslim Maulvi approached MGA and asked him to give a speech.  MGA agreed, however, MGA and other Ahmadiyya sources tell us that MGA was prevented by his GOD to give them speech, and thus he reneged.  However, the truth is that MGA was incapable.  Nevertheless, Maulvi Muhammad Ismael seems to have engaged MGA in some type of Mubahila contest.  He even wrote a book against MGA in 1889.  This might be the first instance of MGA conducting a Mubahila challenge with another Muslim.

Maulvi Muhammad Ismael was a liberal Maulvi who’s friend had visited MGA at Qadian and he says:

“Syed Ahmad Arab, who is my trusted friend, narrated to me, ‘I stayed with Hazrat Mirza in the company of a group of his trusted friends…and discovered that he possesses astrological
instruments that he puts to his use.’”

In response to this charge, MGA challenged Maulvi Muhammad Ismail of Aligarh to a
mubahalah.  MGA wrote:

“I have no recollection of any Syed Ahmad who stayed with me for two months. The onus of producing this person is on Maulvi sahib so that we can ask him face to face what instruments he has seen with me. There is really no need for an Arab, or non- Arab, to give evidence in this matter. I am still alive, so why don’t you, Maulvi sahib, come and stay with me for two months and see for yourself?” (see Mujadid e Azim again).

Ahmadiyya sources tell us that Maulvi Muhammad Ismael died a short while after
We have not confirmed this as of yet, however, Ahmadiyya sources should never be trusted.  Nevertheless, we have reported what they wrote.

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/27/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-spoke-with-a-terrible-stutter-and-ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-it-they-called-it-a-stammer/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/03/the-first-bait-form-in-ahmadiyya-included-an-oath-of-loyalty-to-the-british-government-1889-to-1947/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/25/the-philosophy-of-the-teachings-of-islam-aka-islami-usool-ki-falasifi1896-the-inside-story/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/12/lecture-lahore-was-not-a-speech-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-gave/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/mirza-ghulams-ahmad-lecture-in-amritsar-nov-1905-was-not-a-lecture-it-was-a-riot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-admitted-that-mga-used-lots-of-editors-and-ghost-writers/

http://www.iupress.indiana.edu/product_info.php?products_id=807413

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/06/the-life-and-death-of-maulvi-abdul-karim-sialkoti/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=never+led

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/11/15/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-tour-of-delhi-and-amritsar-oct-nov-1905/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-used-scribes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/mgas-right-arm-was-disabled-he-cant-be-sultan-ul-qalam/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/12/the-story-of-how-mga-hurt-his-right-arm-and-was-disabled-since-his-youth/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-admitted-that-mga-used-lots-of-editors-and-ghost-writers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=ghost+writers

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/04/ahmadiyya-mullahs-have-been-caught-editing-the-writings-of-mga-yet-again/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/04/maulvi-sher-ali-told-the-world-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-would-send-his-arabic-writings-to-noorudin-and-ahsan-amrohi-for-editing/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Noorudinhttps://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Amrohi

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=arabic

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/06/hani-tahir-exposes-ahmadiyya-lies-again-the-arabic-of-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/was-noorudin-the-ghost-writer-of-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/mgas-ghost-writers-argue-on-the-prophethood-of-mga-in-1900/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-muqamat-al-hariri/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/02/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-was-a-student-of-noorudin-pre-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/15/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-debate-with-batalvi-summer-of-1891-was-stopped-by-the-british-govt-on-mgas-behalf/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/27/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-spoke-with-a-terrible-stutter-and-ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-it-they-called-it-a-stammer/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mga-lost-the-debate-with-molvi-muhammad-bashir-bhopali-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-had-5-written-debates-no-oral-debates/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/23/in-1891-when-mga-made-his-big-claims-he-denied-prophethood-mufti-sadiq-was-heavily-involved/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=ghost

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-embarrassed-noorudin-in-1891/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the Splitting of the Moon incident of Muhammad

Intro
MGA copied Sir Syed’s entire playbook when it came to denying miracles and the unlimited abilities of Allah.  It was Sir Syed who first wrote that Esa (as) was dead and never returning, he also wrote that the concept of the “Mahdi” was totally false and nothing more than Muslims exaggerating about their greatness.  Ahmadi’s are known to waffle on this subject and many more.  Normally, Ahmadi’s reject all miracles and give them a “rational-explanation”, totally downgrading their status as miracles.  MGA had the famous incident of the red drops appearing out of thin air, this was boasted by MGA as a total miracle with divine help.  However, this was in the 1886 era and MGA hadn’t totally rejected miracles as of yet.  In fact, in 1886, in MGA’s book, “Surma chashma Arya”, MGA defended the physicality of the splitting of the moon by saying that all the laws of Allah are unknown, this was another written debate that MGA had, the very first argument made by the hindus was the falsity of the splitting of the moon argument, MGA defended the common Muslim position, which was that it was a physical miracle, he did the same in terms of the miraculous Birth of Jesus also, he also defended the fire-incident that was related about Abraham, MGA also called that a physical miracle.  MGA waited til 1891, then, he rejected the physicality of the Miraaj, and many other miracles that were divinely ordained.  In terms of the splitting of the moon, it comes from the Quran, Chapter 54:1-2.  It is also mentioned in many Sahih hadiths.  In 1892, in Ainah Kamalate Islam, MGA again concurred that Muhammad (saw) did in fact pray for miracles and had many, the splitting of the moon is mentioned, however, at this juncture, MGA and his team didn’t go into detail, they also mentioned how Muhammad (saw) was able to feed many and hydrate many from a simple cup or bucket (see the reference in the below).  It seems that MGA was publicly lying, he rejected all miracles, however, in 1892, he was paying lip service, just like he did on the topic of prophethood.  In Malfuzat, Volume-1, MGA is recorded 4-5 times confirming that the splitting of the moon and other miracles were physical, just not understood by humans yet, MGA even admonished people who counter-argued that this miracle was simply a type of Lunar Eclipse (see page 137). After MGA died, in Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya Volume-5, MGA’s team of writers dismissed the physicality of the splitting of the moon and called it a type of lunar eclipse.

1886, Surmah Chasma Aryah
In this book of MGA, he discusses the splitting of the moon, see pages 14-17.  For a better reference, see the ROR of February 2006:

“”””We wish to point out that the miracle of the splitting of the moon is not an event that the Muslims put forth as proof of the truth of Islam and as a principal argument in support of the truth of the Holy Qur’an. Out of thousands of internal and external miracles and signs, this was also a natural sign which is supported by historical proof. If overlooking clear proofs we are to suppose that this miracle has not been established, and if we are to interpret the relevant verse of the Holy Quran as the Christians or the followers of nature, or those who repudiate external events interpret it it would do no harm to Islam.  The truth is that the Word of God has wholly relieved the Muslims of the need of relying upon other miracles. It is not only a miracle in itself, but on account of its blessings and lights, it produces m i r a c l e s .

The Holy Qur’an comprises in itself such perfect qualities that it is in no need of extraordinary
miracles. The presence of external miracles adds nothing to it and their absence would disclose no defect in it. The beauty of the Qur’an is not decked out with the ornaments of external miracles. It comprises in itself thousands of strange and wonderful miracles
which can be witnessed by the people of every age. It is not necessary to refer only to the past.
The Qur’an is such a beautiful beloved that everything derives ornamentation from it and it is not dependent upon anything else for its own ornamentation.

Those who object to the miracle of the splitting of the moon have only one instrument to make, and even that a broken one, that the splitting of the moon is contrary to the law of nature. The
followers of the law of nature contend that it is obvious that so far as a man can find by the
exercise of his reason there is nothing apart from nature in the law of nature, that is to say, the
observation of the universe indicates that everything material and non-material by which we are
surrounded is part of a wonderful system for its existence and continuance and for its eff e c t .
This system is inherent in everything and never departs from anything. Whatever nature has designed will happen without fail in the same way.

We accept all that, but does it prove that Divine methods are their law are limited to that which
is our observation and experience no more? To believe that Divine Power is unlimited is of the
essence of the Divine system; it ensures that the door of intellectual progress should always remain open. Then what a mistake it is to put forward the proposition that whatever is beyond our understanding or observation is outside the law of nature! When we confess that the laws of nature are unending and unlimited, it should be our attitude that we should not reject every new thing because it is beyond our reason. We should assess the matter on its proof or lack of proof. If it is proved we should enter it in the list of the laws of nature, and if it is not proved we should confine ourselves to affirming that it is not proved. We would not be entitled to say that it is outside the law of nature. To hold anything as being beyond the law of nature, it is necessary that we should encompass all Divine laws which are eternal as within a circle and our intellect should fully comprehend all that God’s Power has revealed from the beginning up to now and that He will reveal through Eternity….

We believe that the Powers ofGod Almighty are unlimited, then it would be madness to hope to
encompass all His Powers. For if they can be confined within the measure of our observation, then how would they be unlimited and unending? In such case, we are not only confronted with the difficulty that our finite and incomplete experience should comprehend all the Powers of the
Eternal God, but there would arise a much greater difficulty that by limiting His Powers He Himself would also be limited and we would be affirming that we have discovered all the reality of God Almighty and that we have arrived at its depth and bottom.  Such an assumption would be
disrespectful and destructive of faith and would amount to a total denial of God. (Surmah Chashm Arya, Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 2, pp. 60-65).  

1886
Surmah Chashma Arya is nothing more than the written debate that MGA had with Murlinder at his own house in Qadian with some Hindus.  The Hindus attacked the miracle of the splitting of the moon and MGA defended the orthodox Islamic position.  MGA never changed this belief until he died.  After MGA died, it was downgraded as a lunar eclipse of sorts (see BA5).

1890
“””Let it be known that the miracles of Prophets are of two kinds: (1) Those that are purely heavenly phenomena, in which human design and reason play no part, such as the miracle of the splitting of the moon, a miracle of our lord and master, the Holy Prophetsa. God manifested this miracle through His infinite power to manifest the majesty of His true and perfect Prophetsa. (2) Miracles of wisdom. These are manifested with the help of the extraordinary wisdom that only comes from Divine revelation. An example of this is the miracle of Solomon referred to in the verse

A palace paved smooth with slabs of glass.—Al-Naml, 27:45

which was witnessed by Queen Sheba and she was consequently blessed with faith.”””
[Izala-e-Auham, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 3, pp. 253-254, footnote](See Also Essence of Islam, Vol. 5, page 32).  

1891-1892
In MGA’s book, “Three Questions by a Christian and their Answers”, he again confirms that the splitting of the moon which was referred to in 54: 1-3, really happened, MGA even refers his readers to his book, Surma Chashma Arya (See pages 30-34).

 

1892, MGA comments on the miracle of the splitting of the moon
“”””When a person arrives at this exalted stage of meeting with God, he sometimes performs acts which appear to be beyond human power and have the colour of Divine Power. For instance, during the battle of Badr, the Holy Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be on him] threw a handful of gravel at the opposing force not accompanied by any prayer, but with his own spiritual power, which affected the opposing force in such an extraordinary manner that everyone’s eyes were struck by the gravel and they were rendered sightless and began to run around in confusion and helplessness. This miracle is referred to in the verse:

al-Anfal, 8:18

When you threw the handful of pebbles, it was not you who did throw, but it was Allah Who threw;

Meaning that it was Divine Power that was working behind the scene and it did that which was not within human power. 

In the same way, another miracle of the Holy Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be on him] which was the splitting of the moon, was displayed by Divine Power. It was not accompanied by any prayer as it happened merely by his pointing at the moon with his finger which was filled with Divine power. There are many other miracles which the Holy Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be on him] worked purely with his power and which were not accompanied by any prayer. On many occasions, he multiplied water so much by dipping his fingers into a cup of water that the whole host and their camels and horses drank of it and yet the original quantity of the water was not diminished. On many occasions, by putting his hand upon three or four loaves of bread, he satisfied the hunger of thousands. On some occasions, he blessed a small quantity of milk with his lips and a company of people drank from it and were filled. On some
occasions, by adding his saliva into a well of brackish water, he rendered it sweet. On some occasions, he healed severely wounded people of their injuries by placing his hands upon them. On some occasions, he replaced the eyeballs of people which had fallen out in consequence of some injury received in battle and healed them with the blessings of his hand. In this way, he did many other things by his personal power behind which worked Divine Power.

If the Brahmus and the philosophers and the followers of nature of today refuse to accept these miracles, they are to be excused for they cannot recognize the station at which a human being is endowed with Divine power by way of reflection. If they laugh at these things they are also to be excused for they have not progressed beyond their childish condition and have not reached any degree of spiritual maturity. Their condition is far from perfect and they are happy that they should die in that imperfect condition.

But one pities the Christians, who having heard of some similar, but of a lower degree of, events in the life of Jesus, put them forward as an argument in support of the divinity of Jesus and allege that the reviving of the dead by Jesus and the healing of paralytics and lepers by him was by his own power and not by any prayer, and that this is proof that he was truly the son of God and even God himself. It is a pity that they are unaware that if a human being could become God by performing such exploits then our lord and master, the Holy Prophet
[peace and blessings of Allah be on him] was much more entitled to such divinity for he performed mightier miracles than were displayed by Jesus. Not only did the Holy Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be on him] work these extraordinary miracles himself, but left a legacy of a long series of them among his followers till the Day of Judgement, which has been in evidence always in all ages and will continue to be in evidence till the end of the world. The impress of Divine power which has been experienced by holy souls among the Muslims is difficult to match from among other people. Then what folly is it to believe in someone as God or as the son of God, on account of these extraordinary events. If a man can become God by performing such exploits, there would be no end to the number of gods!”””
[A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 5, pp. 65-67] 
(via Essence of Islam, Vol. 1, pages 274-276)

 

1891-1899, Malfuzat, vol. 1, p. 72, Via Essence of Islam, Vol. 5, page 28
Remember, Malfuzat wasn’t published until the 1960’s.  This seems to be from a portion of the book which represents 1891-1899.

“””The truth of the matter is that God Almighty does not do anything against the laws of nature. What He does is that He creates the causes, whether we know of them or not, and these are always present. Hence, miracles, such as splitting of the moon and

Turn cold, O Fire, and be a source of peace.—Al-Anbiya’, 21:70. (This verse refers to the miracle whereby the fire became cold when Abrahamas was thrown into it.)

are also no exceptions. Rather, they too resulted from some very subtle and hidden means,
and were based on true and factual science. Shortsighted people and those who are enamoured of dark philosophy cannot comprehend these things.””””

1904, in Maulvi Noorudin’s famous self biography entitled, Nur ud Din
On page 146 of this book, as quoted and translated by Zafrullah Khan, Noorudin wrote that he never believed that the fire mentioned in 21:70 was simply the fire of opposition.  However, MGA seems to have disagreed and still believed it to be a physical phenomenon.

Oct. 1908, Braheen e Ahmadiyya vol. 5 (BA5)
In BA5, MGA and his team of writers calls the splitting of the moon as a type of lunar eclipse (see pages 106-107).  Thus, after MGA died, the editing work began.

1917, Muhammad Ali denies the physicality of the splitting of the moon
In Muhammad Ali’s famous 1917 edition of this Commentary on the Quran, he opines that this event was really a lunar eclipse of sorts, thus copying the answer from BA5.

1920, Mirza Bashir Ahmad’s biography on the life of Muhammad
In this era, Mirza Bashir Ahmad seems to have been co-editing the ROR.  In the Urdu version of the ROR, he began writing a biography of Muhammad under the title, ‘Our Master”.  When he reached the topic of the splitting of the moon, he totally rejected the physicality of it and claimed it simply appeared as such to those Muslims and non-Muslims who saw it (see page 233-237).  This book was translated into english via the English ROR of 2010 and then published as a book.

The 5-volume commentary of the Quran
The Qadiani branch claims that it was only meant to appear as split, it was never physically split (see page 2523).

Muhammad Ali and the Lahori branch denied the physicality of the splitting of the moon in 1917
In Muhammad Ali’s famous commentary of 1917, he totally denied the physicality of the splitting of the moon (see 54:1-3).

Zamakhshari
Al-Zamakhshari, a commentator of the Qur’an, acknowledged the splitting of the moon as one of Muhammad’s miracles. But he also suggested that the splitting might take place only on the day of judgment.[4]

Ibn Kathir

The classical commentator Ibn Kathir provides a list of the early traditions mentioning the incident: A tradition transmitted on the authority of Anas bin Malik states that Muhammad split the moon after the pagan Meccans asked for a miracle. Another tradition from Malik transmitted through other chains of narrations, mentions that the mount Nur was visible between the two parts of the moon (Mount Nur is located in Hijaz. Muslims believe that Muhammad received his first revelations from God in a cave on this mountain, Cave Hira’). A tradition narrated on the authority of Jubayr ibn Mut’im with a single chain of transmission says that the two parts of the moon stood on two mountains. This tradition further states that the Meccan responded by saying “Muhammad has taken us by his magic… If he was able to take us by magic, he will not be able to do so with all people.” Traditions transmitted on the authority of Ibn Abbas briefly mention the incident and do not provide much details.[2] Traditions transmitted on the authority of Abdullah bin Masud describe the incident as follows:[2][11]

We were along with God’s Messenger at Mina, that moon was split up into two. One of its parts was behind the mountain and the other one was on this side of the mountain. God’s Messenger said to us: Bear witness to this 039:6725

The narrative was used by some later Muslims to convince others of the prophethood of Muhammad. Annemarie Schimmel for example quotes the following from Muslim scholar Qadi Iyad who worked in the 12th century:[6]

It has not been said of any people on the earth that the moon was observed that night such that it could be stated that it was not split. Even if this had been reported from many different places, so that one would have to exclude the possibility that all agreed upon a lie, yet, we would not accept this as proof to the contrary, for the moon is not seen in the same way by different people… An eclipse is visible in one country but not in the other one; in one place it is total, in the other one only partial.

 

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/11/sir-syed-was-the-first-muslim-in-india-to-ever-say-that-all-hadith-on-the-mahdi-were-weak-mga-copied/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/27/sir-syeds-view-on-esa-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=red+drops

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-denied-the-physicality-of-the-miraaj-in-1890-in-izala-auham/

http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1675&Itemid=110

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_of_the_moon

https://www.alislam.org/quran/view/?page=2523&region=E1

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya-Part-5.pdf

http://www.thecult.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=816&p=7137&hilit=splitting#p7137

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/20/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-first-debate-1886-a-written-debate-with-murlidhar/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/hq/comm/muhammadalienglishholyquran1917/muhammadalienglishholyquran1917.shtml

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Essence-5.pdf

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/3-Questions-by-a-Christian.pdf

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Malfuzat-1.pdf

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/5399/the-life-character-of-the-seal-of-the-prophetssaw-part-14/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/hq/comm/muhammadalienglishholyquran1917/muhammadalienglishholyquran1917.shtml

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR200602.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/29/maulana-nur-ud-din-wrote-a-book-entitled-nur-ud-din-1904-mga-was-born-in-1839/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/01/was-mga-unsure-in-terms-of-the-miraculous-birth-of-esa-as/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Who is Maulvi Sher Ali? (1875-1947)

Intro
Maulvi Sher Ali was another fanatical Ahmadi who worked directly for MGA and his family.  It seems that MGA mentioned him in 1890 in his book Izala Auham (however, Maulvi Sher Ali’s own writings contradict this).  Per Ahmadiyya sources, he was born on 11-13-1875 and was thus barely 14-15 years old by 1890 (See Dard, page 550).  In fact, Maulvi Sher Ali’s uncle,  Ch. Sher Muhammad, was an Ahmadi and was in MGA’s team of writers during his 1891 debate in Delhi (see Dard page 292).

Maulvi Sher Ali was not listed in the first 313 companions list of 1896 (See Dard, pages 844-853), however, he was mentioned as someone who donated towards the building of Minaratul Masih (see Dard, page 856).  In 1897, Sher Ali accepted MGA’s bait, just a day before Lekh Ram died (See ROR of 1990, page 4).  Sher Ali was present with MGA at the case of Dr. Clark vs. MGA.  In 1899, MGA told the world that Maulvi Sher Ali was living at Qadian and giving good service ((Advertisement 10 October 1899, Majmooa Ishtiharaat Vol.2 p.153).   By 1901, and even without a proper education, at roughly 26 years old, MGA made him the top headmaster at the Talim ul Islam High School in Qadian.  He began writing essays in the english ROR also, he was working closely with Muhammad Ali.  He remained headmaster of the school until 1903.  He seems to have been idle for 6 years.  From 1903 to 1907, the Talim ul Islam High School was converted into a College, however, they were barely using any facility.  The University Act of 1907 totally shut down the college, it wouldn’t open again until 1948 and in Pakistan.  By 1909, he became assistant editor of the English-ROR and stepped in anytime Muhammad Ali was busy working on his full english commentary of the Quran, and the British government built the biggest building in the history of Qadian which costed 25,000 rupees, this building was so big it began to house students and etc.  During 1913, Noorudin had decided to send Maulvi Sher Ali to London to help Khwaja Kamaluddin build up the Ahmadiyya mission there, however, the new Khalifa cancelled this order as soon as he came to office (see page 6).

In 1914, he sided with the family of MGA and remained in Qadian and thus became the sole editor of the ROR, until others came to help and eventually took over the job from him.  He helped Mirza Bashir Ahmad on collecting data for the famous Seeratul Mahdi and even told how MGA would have his arabic revelations sent to Noorudin and Ahsan Amrohi to check for errors.

He died in Lahore on November 13th, 1947, just a few months after he moved from Qadian and was living in temporary quarters.  He was buried in Lahore but was eventually moved to Rabwah.  His daughter got married to one of the sons of Noorudin (Abdul Mannan) and was ex-communicated 8-years after Maulvi Sher Ali’s death (1955).  He seems to have also written a translation of the Quran which seems to have been published after his death (1955 from Holland), why wasn’t this published in his lifetime, it’s unknown. In 2004, Ahmadiyya INC re-wrote this translation and re-published it in 2004, the original is thus totally missing.

May–1903, English-ROR

PDF 40/47 http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1903/reviewreligionsenglish190305.pdf

“””“The fact that he is known as a Prophet or Nabi refutes the idea that he was a Muhamadan Saint. No intelligent man would think that a person who was reputed as a prophet among the Muhammadans was a Muhammadan saint. Even if a Muhammadan saint worked miracles, they would take him as a Wali at best, and never a prophet. They believe that their HP is the seal of the prophets and that he is not to be followed by any other prophet…….and one who takes him as a muhammadan saint only, betrays his complete ignorance of the beliefs prevailing among the muhammadans””””

“…..we do not know of any prophet who appeared in Kashmir in the last 200 years”

May–1907–English-ROR
Maulvi Sher Ali writes an essay about the plague prophecy, he admits that even houses adjacent to MGA’s have had people die of plague, he also calls MGA as the “Messenger of the Latter Days”.

May–1908–English-ROR
Maulvi Sher Ali writes an essay series on the Mahdi and the Ahmadiyya viewpoint, this extends to several issues.  This specific essay was re-produced in the ROR of 1987.

A story from 1909
Dr Muhammad Abdullah from Qila Subasingh testifies:

“””During the time of Hadhrat Khalifatul Masih I, Hadhrat Maulwi Sher Ali Sahib(ra) worked as the editor of the Review of Religions. Once two English persons came to Qadian and passed along the northern part of Hadhrat Nawab Muhammad Ali’s residence where at that time Hadhrat Maulwi Sher Ali Sahib(ra) was feeding his water buffalo. His collar was open and he was attired in simple clothes. One of the English officersrequested Maulwi Sahib that they wanted to meet the Editor of the Review of Religions and asked where they could meet him. Maulwi Sahib volunteered to accompany them to his house and brought them to his own house and seating them in his sitting room said that he would call the Editor.

Maulwi Sahib wanted to prepare tea and get better acquainted with his visitors but they insisted that he should take them there so that they could meet him in person perhaps en route. Upon this, Hadhrat Maulwi Sher Ali Sahib said, “I am the Editor of the Review’”.

The two English officers were utterly dumbfounded and in their reflex admitted, ‘We thought that the Editor of this magazine was some Englishman.’ (Sirat Hadhrat Maulana Sher Ali Sahib(ra) pp 189-190 by Malik Nazir Ahmad Riaz, missionary).

ROR–1930
He writes an essay on the importance of fasting.

ROR–1990
Maulvi Sher Ali claims that he came to Qadian in 1897, a day before Lekh Ram was murdered, thus contradicting Dard and other Ahmadiyya sources that claim that he was already in Qadian by 1889-1890.

Link and Related Essays

http://aaiil.org/uk/newsletters/2010/thelightuk201006.pdf

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR200211.pdf

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/265/muslim-fasting/

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR190707.pdf#page=19

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR199007.pdf#page=5

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR198707.pdf#page=28

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/24/amatul-hayee-or-amtul-hai-the-daughter-of-nooruddin-and-the-wife-of-the-2nd-khalifa-mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-and-her-mysterious-death/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1903/reviewreligionsenglish190305.pdf

https://www.alislam.org/v/6100.html

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-molana-muhammad-hussain-batalvi-and-muslims-leaders-in-british-india-in-august-of-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Clark

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/30/ahmadi-teachers-at-the-talim-ul-islam-high-school-were-corrupt-they-would-pass-mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-even-when-he-failed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/30/the-british-govt-donated-25000-rupees-for-the-talim-ul-islam-high-school-in-qadian-in-1909/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/04/the-sons-of-noorudin-were-expelled-from-ahmadiyya-in-1956/

https://www.alislam.org/quran/view/?page=-8&region=E2

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Pics

Piggot was mentioned in the Review of Religions of Jan 1912

Intro
After MGA died in May of 1908, the fanatical Ahmadi’s went out of their way and tried to make some of MGA’s failed prophecies as successful.  They kidnapped a few children of Batalvi and claimed that they had completed this failed specific failed prophecy and many others.  In June of 1908, Noorudin explained away the the failure of the Muhammadi Begum prophecy and etc etc etc.  Pigot was another failed prophecy, they had already mentioned Piggot in 1911 and brought up the “prayer duel” again in 1912.  In this essay, they claim that Piggot’s name was wiped from this earth.  However, this isn’t true, by 1912, Piggot was still living the life of a playboy, similar to Hugh Hefner.  The writer of this essay has to be Muhammad Ali, who was the editor at the time, Maulvi Sher Ali was the assistant editor in those days (1911-1912) (See ROR, Full year of 1911, index page).  They were presenting Piggot as a sign of MGA’s truth, which is academic dishonesty.

The reference
January 1912, english ROR, pages 1-15.  http://aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1912/reviewreligionsenglish_191201.pdf

Why were the Lahori-Ahmadi’s so confused about Piggot? 
In March of 2004, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s published a bulletin wherein it was asserted that Piggot died as a result of MGA’s prayer duel (see page 4).  Furthermore, in the 2001-2003 era, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s quoted the Qadiani branches Canadian version of the Gazette and defended Muhammad Ali for writing that MGA was a prophet in 1902.  See pages 39-41, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s say again that Piggot would meet a severe chastisement which would end on his death as a result of MGA’s prayer duel.

Links and Related Essays

http://aaiil.org/text/books/others/misc/aaiilbeliefspromisedmessiah/aaiilbeliefspromisedmessiah.pdf

http://aaiil.org/uk/newsletters/2005/0305ukbulletin.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/10/who-is-maulvi-sher-ali-1875-1947/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/08/even-in-1907-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-still-lusting-for-his-niece-muhammadi-begum/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/31/batalvis-children-were-brought-to-qadian-by-force/

http://aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/1912/reviewreligionsenglish_191201.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/in-1907-ahmadiyya-newspapers-were-still-asserting-that-piggot-would-die-before-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/04/piggot-was-mentioned-by-the-ahmadiyya-newspaper-review-of-religions-in-1903/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/26/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-initial-writings-to-piggot-in-1902/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1911.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/20/dear-ahmadiyya-but-dr-alexander-dowie-changed-his-claims-after-mgas-death-challenge/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/abdullah-athim-never-repented-ahmadiyya-leadership-lied/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/fate-of-a-false-prophet-by-syed-hasanat-ahmad-the-review-of-religions-august-1984/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/16/ahmadiyya-leadership-has-been-caught-red-handed-as-they-lied-about-dr-schweisos-comments-on-piggot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-wrote-that-piggot-would-not-repent/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/22/piggot-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-the-scan-work-live-from-the-discussion-forum-on-ahmadiyya-on-fb/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/24/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-wrote-to-piggot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/17/ahmadis-editing-their-books-on-piggot/

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/5593/rev-john-hugh-smyth-pigott-his-claim-prophecy-and-end/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1911.pdf

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam #atifmian #piggot #Agapemone #pigott

Up ↑