Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"editing"

Ahmadiyya clerics have been caught editing the writings of MGA yet again

Intro
Dear readers, we have caught Ahmadiyya leadership editing the writings of MGA many times.  See here: https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-admitted-that-mga-used-lots-of-editors-and-ghost-writers/

In this specific case, we have found an instance wherein there was editing in the case of the Muhammadi Begum prophecy.  In MGA’s book, “A’ina Kamalat Islam”, in the original edition, MGA and his team had written that Muhammadi Begum’s father, Mirza Ahmad Baig would die within 4 months, however, in later editions of this book, it was changed to 6 months.

But Dard tells us…
Dard tells us that the marriage of Muhammadi Begum happened on April 7th, 1892, see page 334.  He also tells us that her father, Mirza Ahmad Baig died Sep 30th, 1892.  That is 5 and 1/2 months.  Thus, the prediction of MGA was false.  However, the Ahmadiyya mullah team went back and edited….they began by inventing the system of Ruhani Khuzain, and thus burning all of the old books and creating new ones, with many edits.

Related essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=muhammadi

The scans

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Ahmadiyya leadership is always editing books on Ahmadiyya and MGA’s so-called ilhams

Intro
My team and I have found countless instances of academic dishonesty by Ahmadiyya leadership.  This is the proof that Ahmadiyya is a business, and their mullahs know fully about the fraud of Ahmadiyya, they are shareholders and thus remain quiet, they will never tell on their masters, i.e., the Mirza family.  If they did ever tell, they would be out of a job and homeless.  In the below, I have shown how MGA had a sick and vile “fake-ilham” about his cousin (his brother in village terms) and his wife.  MGA hated his cousin so much, he openly cursed his wife, who would be considered MGA’s sister (in village environment).  Further, this woman that he is calling a prostitute, she eventually became the great grandmother of Mirza Tahir Ahmad‘s wife.  Mirza Tahir ahmad married her in 1957.  Her name was Asifa Begum, she died in 1992.

Mirza Imam Din was dead by 1904, this ilham was 1906
It’s important to note, Mirza imam ud din died in 1904, his widow was still alive and still lived in Qadian, MGA still attacked her and hated her with a passion. https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/24/mirza-imam-din-the-cousin-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

Who was Asifa Begum?
She was mother of Khursheed Begum who was Daughter in law of MGAQ and wife of Mirza Sultan.

The Mirza Tahir Ahmad connection?
“”””On 14 October 1957, Hadhrat Sahibzada Mirza Tahir Ahmad Sahib returned to Pakistan and on 5 December 1957, his Nikah was announced with Hadhrat Syeda Asifa Begum Sahiba, the daughter of Amatul Salam Sahiba and Sahibzada Mirza Rashid Ahmad Sahib.”””

See—https://www.alislam.org/library/periodicals/tariq-uk/chapter2.pdf

Page 22

Download it here: The life of Mirza Tahir Ahmad

Tadhkirah, 2004 online english edition, MGA called his cousins wife as a Hooker

“On Monday morning I saw in my dream that Imamud Din’s wife, who had been a prostitute, had fallen down.” (Diary of the Promised Messiah p. 12).  Quoted in Tadhkirah, 2004 online edition.

Tadhkirah, 2004 online english edition, MGA called his cousins wife as a Hooker–SCAN

Previous editions of Urdu Tadhkirah, showing the quotes

Read my additional entries on Ahmadis editing the writings of MGA
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=editing

What is the Diary of MGA?
I haave found references to this diary as early as the 1915-era, as the newly crowned Khalifa, Mirza Bashir-uddin Mahmud Ahmad quoting it vs. the Lahori ceders.  However, it seemed to have magically appeared to the Khalifa, it was missing for many years.  It is most likely a fraud, concocted by the family of MGA.

Ahmadis editing their books on Piggot

Intro
This video which was made by Akber and AK describes how Ahmadis have been editing their books for years and years and years.

The video
https://youtu.be/_v2B_07PIxA

akber

Conclusions
Ahmadi mullahs like Muhammad Ali and Noorudin were working day and night to cover-up the falsity of MGA.  They simply lied about everything and were in full callusion.

Hani Tahir catches Ahmadi-clerics/employees editing the writings of MGA

Intro
As we all know, Hani Tahir recently left Ahmadiyya and began a string of videos wherein he exposes how Ahmadi-Mullahs have been lying for the past 100+ years.  There was a video wherein he found an Ahmadi (a co-worker of his) that purposely erased a portion of a prophecy by MGA.

Which Prophecy?
Its from 1905, MGA was claiming that an Earthquake would occur that was similar to the final Earthquake before judgement day as described in the Quran.  In the original prophecy, it was written that this prophecy would indeed happen during MGA’s lifetime, however, since it didn’t happen, his editing team began working on a solution.  They simply erased the portion that mentioned, “in my lifetime” and then added it to tadkhirah in 1935 and all proceeding editions.

hanitahir

Here is the full video by Hani Tahir

Conclusions
Ahmadis have been editing and adding and erasing to the work of MGA for years and years and years.  See my other essays here for more on the topic. 

Ahmadis keep editing MGA’s writings

Intro
As we all know, Ahmadi-mullahs keep editing the writings of MGA in an attempt to cover-up his errors and omissions.  In fact, the entire book of announcements that the AMI published is exactly that…..an attempt at backdating and forward-dating.  Further, the collection of Ruhani Khuzain is an attempt to edit MGA’s writings and etc.

2009 edition Tadkirah vs. 2004 edition Tadhkirah

In the old version of Tadhkirah (2004 edition) there was an ilham on page 346:

God almighty has conveyed it to me that every person to whom my call is conveyed and who does not accept me is not a Muslim and is accountable to God for his defult (Letter addressed to Dr. Abdul Hakeem)(April 1906).

In the new version of the Tadhkirah this revelation does not exist!!! It seems that Masroor is at again, he has purposely re-published a new version of this book so that some controversial revelations might be suppressed.

On a side note, MGA had denied ever making this statement.

In Haqiqatul Wahy(1907) p. 178 he writes:

Dr. Abdul Hakim in his pamphlet MASIH AL-DAJJAL and other writings accuses me of having written that anyone who does not believe in me, even if he has not heard my name or is living in a country beyond the reach of my call, is an unbeliever and shall go to hell. This is a patent fabrication by the Doctor. I have never said so in any book or poster of mine. It is binding on him to produce such writings of mine in which I have said so!

MGA must have forgot what he wrote in that letter to Dr. Hakeem Khan, a year after writing the letter he totally denied it.

Who collected Tadhkirah??

The first edition (of Tadhkirah) was compiled by a committee, headed by Mirza Bashir Ahmad, appointed by Khalifatul Masih II and was published in 1935 (see the preface of the current edition).

Conclusions
The Ahmadiyya editing team is notorious in their attempts to clean out the controversial writings of MGA.  This is how Ahmadis begin to delete data.  However, this data is still available on the Ahmadi website under “Essense of Islam” Vol. 4 (see page 87).  And it is mentioned in the writings of Mahmud Ahmad.  Interestingly enough, this quote was also quoted in 1935, in the Al-Fazl.  Thus, this quote was approved by the sons of MGA for over 70 years.

hakim

Questions?
Who ordered for its removal?  Why?  What is the real reason for removal?

 

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Muqamat Al-Hariri

Intro
MGA had a team of writers, these writers would plagiarize all the time.  In the below, I have collected all data on MGA and his team and how they plagiarized from Muqamat Al-Hariri.  Our fellow Arab Ex-Ahmadi’s have exposed this in their writings, see Hani Tahir and Ikrima Najabi.
Brother Hani Taher and other Arab reverts have pointed out that Mirza Ghulam Qadiani’s famous Khutba Ilhamiyya does contain text from Al-Hariri’s Muqamat.  In this case, and all others, Ahmadi editors have tried to present things “after-the-fact”, and thus twist up the timeline of events.  We have, however, presented a true timeline in the below.  MGA barely knew any Arabic, all of the Imam’s of India knew this.  However, MGA would have his team write in Arabic on his behalf and thus fool people.

It all started in 1897 with Hariri
Maulavi ‘Abdul Haq Ghaznavi wrote a poster against the MGA in which he raised the objection and challenged the knowledge of Arabic of MGA, and invited to hold a contest in Arabic with him so that the question could be established who knew Arabic better. MGA immediately accepted the offer of a contest and said that since he had no knowledge of Arabic and that he was an illiterate according to Maulavi ‘Abdul Haq Ghaznavi, if as a result of the contest he was overwhelmed in the debate, which would be nothing short of a miracle of God, then the Maulavi would have to offer his hand in bai‘at and join the Ahmadiyyah Jama‘at. Maulavi ‘Abdul Haq Ghaznavi and his friend, Shaikh Najfi, a Shia, remained silent and refused to honour his own invitation to hold a contest (see Hidden Treasures of Islam, pages 193-195).

MGA and his team then wrote Hujjatulla (God’s Final Argument) in Arabic with an Urdu translation (he began on March 17, 1897 and completed on May 26, 1897)
MGA then asked his opponents, particularly Maulavi ‘Abdul Haq Ghaznavi and Shaikh Najfi, (both had written letters to MGA and made assertions that he did not know Arabic) and Maulavi Muhammad Hussain Batalavi, to produce a book at least comparable to his Arabic and produce the like of it in the same manner within three or four months, then they can treat me as a liar.Further, they were welcome to enlist aid from anyone in producing a book of similar size, using prose and poem and invite Professor Maulavi ‘Abdullah or any one scholar who can swear that their written book was superior or even equal to mine in quality and the scholar swearing in such manner will be seized by divine punishment within 41 days, then if he survives I will burn all my books and will seek repentance on their hands, this will settle daily bickering between me and them and if they do not advance to accept the challenge then their falsehood would be exposed to public. He allowed them to appoint a professor of Arabic to act as a judge and let him make his award under solemn oath. MGA said if the adjudicator declared that the work of his opponents was superior to his, he would pray to God and if the judge was not then overtaken by the wrath of God within a period of 41 days, he would burn all his books and stand condemned. But no one had the courage to accept this daring challenge.

In this book, which bore the title of Hujjatullah, MGA spoke of the various signs which his God had shown in his favour. He also pointed out the error of his Shia opponents. In a graphic and eloquent manner he explained that the Shia beliefs were not right, because the Caliphs, Hadrat Abu Bakrra, Hadrat ‘Umar and Hadrat ‘Uthman, were the rightful Caliphs and Hadrat ‘Ali had acknowledged them so. (see Hidden Treasures of Islam, pages 193-195).

After Hujjatullah was published
MGA’s critics allege that several sentences and paragraphs in this text are taken directly without alteration, from Maqamat al-Hariri, the best known poetry collection of the Arabic scholar and poet Al-Hariri of Basra.  For this reason, his claim to divine instruction in Arabic is not accepted in Islamic Orthodoxy. Ahmadis, however, claim that the alleged instances of plagiarism are not true because Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had deliberately inserted the writings of Al-Hariri with his own and then openly declared that he had done as such as a challenge to his critics to compare and separate the two. His followers claim that as clearly stated by him in the beginning of his book Hujjatullah it was only after his use of Arabic was labelled inadequate, ungrammatical and ‘unchaste’ by his opponents that Ghulam Ahmad deliberately amalgamated his own writings with that of Al-Hariri‘s in order to expose his adversaries; whom he called upon to distinguish between his writings and that of Al-Hariri’s.

A quote from Hujjatullah
“””Thus the method which will free the people from his deception is that we present to him paragraphs from our writing and some other paragraphs from the writings of a great Arab writer while concealing the names of the authors, and then call upon him to tell us which paragraph out of this is ours and which is theirs, if you are truthful. Then if he recognizes my sayings and theirs and distinguishes between them as between a shell and its kernel, then we shall give him fifty rupees as a reward.”””

– Hujjatulla, pg. 4-5

By 1903, MGA considered himself as Hujjatulla
Interestingly enough, by 1903, MGA was calling himself as the Hujjatulla.

“”””Hadrat Hujjatullah [The Promised Messiah] may peace and blessings be on him, supplicated at Gurdaspur for those of his friends who were present there and also collectively for those who were not present. He prayed by name for those who were present or whose name he recalled, and also collectively for all members of the Jama‘at, whereupon he
received the revelation:

[Arabic] Then good news for the believers.

[al-Badr, vol. 3, no. 1, January 1, 1904, p. 6 footnote and
al-Hakam, vol. 7, no. 46, 47, December 17, 24, 1903, p. 15]

After MGA died, Ahmadi’s lied about MGA’s Arabic abilities
See Hani Tahir’s video on this matter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtWYpjwehPQ

 

From the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah

See page 300—301.April 2, 1893(349)

Maulana ‘Abdul-Karimra said: Hadrat Maulavi Hakim Nurud- Dinra…had started the construction of a large house in Bhera…. The construction had not yet been completed…when one day in the winter Maulavi [Hakim Nur-ud-Dinra] arrived in Qadian for a brief meeting with the Promised Messiahas. The same night the Promised Messiahas received a revelation (350) which indicated that Maulavi [Hakim Nur-ud-Dinra] should migrate to Qadian. Next morning he informed him of this and suggested that he should emigrate to Qadian and should not return home. This faithful one made no excuse. The house remained unfinished but this man of God did not go back. [Address of Maulana ‘Abdul-Karimra, al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 32, September 10, 1902, p. 11]. 

349—

350--Hadrat Khalifatul Masih Ira mentioned this revelation in his autobiography which he dictated to Akbar Najib Abadi as following:

The Promised Messiahas told Maulavi ‘Abdul-Karimra: I have received a revelation concerning Nur-ud-Din. It is in the form of a couplet in the poem of Hariri:

[Do not go back to your homeland. You will face humiliation and suffering there.]
[Mirqatul-Yaqin Fi Hayate Nur-ud-Din]

See Page 1020

April 2, 1893 (1229)
The Promised Messiahas mentioned to Maulavi ‘Abdul- Karimra one day that he had received a revelation:
1230
[Arabic] [Do not be inclined towards your home, in that there are humiliation and trials.]

The Promised Messiah[as] said:

It appears that this revelation has reference to Nur-ud-Din.
[Appendix al-Badr, vol. 8, no. 40, July 29, 1909, p. 77 and Mirqatul-Yaqin FiHayat-e-Nur-ud-Din, p. 169].

1229– Note by Maulana Abdul Latif Bahawalpuri: This date is recorded in the Jaibi Bayad of Hadrat Khalifatul Masih Ira, but it does not record the year. However, we have entered 1893 here because it can be established based on firm evidence. For this reason we have entered it under this year. [See Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, vol. 1, p. 494, new ed., under the heading Faith Inspiring Event of the Migration of Maulana Nur-ud-Dinra]

1230 —Note by Syed Abdul Hayee: The Jaibi Bayad of Hadrat Khalifatul Masih Ira, page 149, records it as following: [Arabic] Do not be inclined towards your home, you will be treated with injustice and will face trials; And adds to it the next couplet of Hariri: [Arabic] Remember, a man of his own mind suffers a loss in his country.

After MGA died, Nuzul ul Masih was published (1909)
Ahmadiyya sources tell us that this was written in 1902 and published in 1909.  This book tells us how MGA’s opponents, specifically Pir Mehr Ali Shah were accusing MGA of plagiarizing from Hariri.

Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi
“”Maulawi Muhammad Ahsan Sahib had a hasty nature. Once out for a walk with the Promised Messiah (on whom be peace) he misheard the Promised Messiah (on whom be peace) when he said there is a difference between word of God and word of man and said this is a revelation of mine compared to revelation of Hariri (an academic). Ahsan Sahib remarked how frivolous it was but as soon as he realised his mistake he instantly said what fine words they were.””  Friday Sermon of Mirza Masroor Ahmad, 7-24-15

In Mujadid-e-Azam, at page 337 Dr. Basharat
While giving detail of Molvi Nuruddin ,s shifting to Qadian, he writes that “Hazrat sahib told Molvi Abdul Karim that I have received a revelation about Molvi Nuruddin as under:-

لا تصبون الی الوطن۔ فیہہ تھان و تمتحن
In next lines the author says this couplet is present in AL-HARIRI.

 

Scans

Videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fx_9JtSEay4&t=385s

Related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=ghost+writershttps://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/04/ahmadiyya-mullahs-have-been-caught-editing-the-writings-of-mga-yet-again/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/02/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-was-a-student-of-noorudin-pre-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/lecture-ludhiana-was-not-a-lecture-it-was-a-riot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/11/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-terrible-arabic-pronunciation-and-syed-abdul-lateef/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/06/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-arabic-came-with-a-punjabee-accent/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Barahin-e- Ahmadiyyah volume 5, was re-published in 1914, it was the second edition



BA-5, 1924 edition
Intro

We have been tracking the writing and publishing of Barahin-e- Ahmadiyyah volume 5.  It can also be spelled as Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya.  Muhammad Ali told us that it was initially published in Oct of 1908, however, he is silent about the supplement.  When was the supplement added?  Who ordered its addition?  Nevertheless, we have come across information from the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, on page 705, wherein it is stated in a footnote that there was a 1914 edition of Barahin-e- Ahmadiyyah volume 5.  This is very odd since it is only 5-6 years after its 1st edition was published.  “Correction of an Error” (originally published in 1901) was also re-published in 1914.

What edits were made to the second edition of Barahin-e-Ahmadiyyah volume 5?
We know that the Ahmadiyya team of Mullah’s are always working to fix the errors and omissions of the Mirza family.  We would have to assume that they either added the supplement in 1914, or edited Barahin-e- Ahmadiyyah volume 5 and then re-published.

Tadhkirah (2004 online english edition) doesn’t have this entry at all
In the 2009 edition of Tadhkirah it is stated this footnote was added by Jalal-ud Din Shams.  He was the “fixer”, he worked on behalf of the Khalifa to cover up many indiscretions of the Mirza family.

We found the 1924 edition of BA-5
My team has found the 1924 edition of BA-5.  It is posted in this essay.  We don’tr know whether Shams erred and wrote 1914 instead of 1924 or if this is the 3rd edition.  Nonetheless, we have posted the scan of the cover page.

Related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Braheen+e+Ahmadiyya+vol+5

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/11/eik-ghalti-ka-izala-aka-correction-of-an-error-was-re-published-on-march-1-1914/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=editing

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?
s=ghost+writershttps://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/04/ahmadiyya-mullahs-have-been-caught-editing-the-writings-of-mga-yet-again/

Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad never wrote any books or never penned any articles

Intro
Just like his father, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad barely wrote anything.  Even in the Talim-ul-Islam school of Qadian, the Ahmadi-mullahs passed him even when he failed.  He stared the Tashhiz al-Azhan magazine in 1906 and was allowed to create his own sub-organization within Ahmadiyya, the Ansarullah.  The friends and well wishers of the Mian Sahib wrote for him and on his behalf.  In fact, in that same era, and in response to an argument by Muhammad Ali, the Qadiani-Khalifa seems to admit that his own newspaper, the Tashhiz al-Azhan continued to write the name Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad as the editor of the newspaper (as late as 1913), even though he was not, he claims that he had no connection with his own newspaper since 1911.  Further, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad never wrote any books either, he dictated what needed to be written and then proof read it or had another mullah proof read it.  This even holds true for those commentaries of the Quran that Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad takes credit for, which are incomplete.

The quote
“””In the first place, the words of Maulawi Muhammad Ahsan possess no special authority. They may be regarded as possessing the same value as the words of any other learned man. In the second place, the publication of his article in the Tashhidhul Adhhan cannot lend any special value to the views expressed therein, because the article was published in October, 1913, when I had already for two years ceased to have any active connection with the magazine. At that time Qazi Muhammad Zahuruddin Akmal was the de facto editor of the Magazine. The managing body of the paper, however, continued to print my name on the cover in order to retain its popularity, inasmuch as it was I who had been editing it since its foundation. Under the circumstances, if any particular view was at that time published in the magazine, it cannot justly be cited against me. I was not then its active editor nor were the articles published in the magazine shown to me whether in original or in proof.””””  (See “Truth about the split”, online edition, page 125,https://www.alislam.org/library/book/the-truth-about-the-split/ ).  

What is Maktubat-e-Ahmadiyyah?

Intro
It seems that after MGA died, Nooruddin began collecting all the letters that MGA and his team wrote and published them into book form, not all of them were published however, nor is it clear as to how many copies were made and if the originals still exist, we are sure of Ahmadiyya editing, so we are careful.  As we all know, Pir Siraj ul Haq Nomani wrote most of MGA’s letters, and on MGA’s behalf, MGA most likely dictated what needed to be written.

The reference is from Hidden Treasures, which is a book that summarizes the writings of MGA and his team
https://www.alislam.org/library/book/hidden-treasures-of-islam/

See the introduction section

Maktubat-e-Ahmadiyyah

“””Letters written by the Promised Messiahas from 1883 to 1908 to various personalities and some of these letters relate to the importance of the Khilafat and about the Companions of the Holy Prophetsa are collected in these volumes.

There are seven volumes of letters. The fifth volume comprises five parts. Details of these volumes are given as:

Volume 1
One hundred and sixteen pages, published in 1908, in Urdu. This comprises a collection of letters that the Promised Messiah had written to Mir ‘Abbas ‘Ali Shah Ludhianvi from October 1882 to June 1885.

Volume 2
Ninety pages, published in Lahore in 1912, in Urdu. This comprises a collection of letters written by the Promised Messiah from 1878 to 1903 to various Hindus and the leaders of the Aryah Samaj, including Indarman Muradabadi, Pandit Dyanand, Pandit Lekh Ram, Bawa Shiv Nara’in and Ram Charan, in which the Promised Messiahas explained the truth of Islam and fixed a period of one year for anyone of them to come and stay with him in order to witness a Divine sign and he also drew a comparison of the teachings of the Holy Quran with the Vedas.

Volume 3
One hundred and twenty-two pages, published in Lahore in 1914, in Urdu, is a collection of letters written by the Promised Messiahas from 1884 to 1903 to Christian missionaries, including Alexander Dowie.  He asked the Christian missionaries to produce a comparable
observation about Jesus as the one made about the Holy Prophetsa by the King of Ethiopia in his time. He offered them a reward of Rs. 1,000 for it. The Promised Messiahas effectively answered all objections raised by Christians about the Holy Prophetsa and established the truth of the Holy Prophetsa with cogent arguments. An Introduction to the hidden Treasures of Islam

Volume 4
Forty pages, published in Qadian, in Urdu, comprises a collection of the letters written by the Promised Messiahas to Maulavi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, in which he marshalled arguments about his truth and adduced and enumerated signs which had taken place in his favour to establish his truth.

Volume 5: Part I
Fifty-six pages, published in 1918, in Urdu, is a collection of 96 letters written by the Promised Messiahas from 1892 to 1905 to Seth ‘Abdur Rehman of Madras.

Volume 5: Part II
One hundred and twenty-eight pages, published in Urdu, is a collection of 88 letters written by the Promised Messiahas from March 8, 1885 to August 26, 1892 to Hadrat Maulavi Hakim Nur-ud-Din. These letters are in his own hand and relate to the efficacy of prayers and specially those made at the eleventh hour. Mention has also been made of some of his revelations specially about the Promised Reformer and also contain suggestions about the printing of the magazines.

Volume 5: Part III
One hundred and seventy-six pages, published in 1929, in Amritsar, in Urdu, is a collection of 278 letters written from 1884 to 1902 to Ch. Rustam ‘Ali, in which he praised the financial assistance rendered by him and other matters.

Volume 5: Part IV
One hundred and forty-four pages, published in 1935, in Amritsar, in Urdu, is a collection of 62 letters written from 1890 to 1906 to Nawab Muhammad ‘Ali Khan in which a number of different subjects have been discussed, including the importance of bai‘at, signs of the Promised Messiah, the method of Istikharah, unreasonable wavering of the people on the prophecy of ‘Abdullah Atham and the true significance of Khatm-e-Nubuwwat.

Volume 5: Part V
Thirty-two pages, published on June 10, 1944, in Hyderabad Deccan, in Urdu, is a collection of 270 letters addressed to Munshi Ahmad Jan Ludhianvi, and other friends in Kapurthala, Hadrat Nawab Muhammad ‘Ali Khan of Jhajjar, Munshi Habibur Rehman, Munshi Dafar Ahmad, Khan Sahib ‘Abdul Majid and Maulavi ‘Abdullah Sanauri, and some other letters written in his own hand.

Volume 6
It is a collection of 23 letters written by the Promised Messiahas to Hadrat Maulavi Hakim Nur-ud-Din and a number of different non Ahmdi scholars. This collection was edited by Sheikh Ya‘qub ‘Ali Khan ‘Irfani.

Volume 7
This collection was compiled in 1954 by Malik Salah-ud-Din, M.A. This has 51 letters, 36 of them were addressed to Nawab Muhammad ‘Ali Khan of Maler Kotla between 1892 to April 1908, and some others addressed to a number of different personalities including Bhai ‘Abdur Rahman Sahib Qadiani and Muhammad Ibrahim Khan (Sindh).

Note: Nazarat Isha‘at has combined all the above letters (and some more letters which could not be included in the seven volumes) into three volumes and published them in 2008.

Up ↑