Search results


The 2nd Khalifa also used a team of ghost-writers

Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad never wrote anything in his life, he was given opium as an infant and had terrible vision. He failed his matriculation exam in 1905-1906 and thus proved that he didn’t know Urdu/English/Arabic. Nevertheless, the Mirza family and their band of brainwashed Ahmadi’s boasted about him and helped create his own newspaper, the Tashhiz al-Azhan. Qazi Muhammad Zahuruddin Akmal was the editor and thus wrote essay’s on behalf of Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad. In 1914, when Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad became the Khalifa, they immediately began to call him the Musleh Maud (and he remained silent). In those days, in addition to Qazi Muhammad Zahuruddin Akmal (Mahmud Ahmad raped his daughter on the roof of Masjid Mubarak), Maulvi Sarwar Shah was also a ghost writer, as well as Maulvi Sher Ali. In 1915, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s published an english commentary of the Quran (and ascribed to the 2nd Khalifa, who didn’t know english and failed his matriculation exam)(it was only 2 chapters and discontinued), this was done to counteract the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. This commentary was created to counteract the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. Muhammad Ali and the Lahori-Ahmadi’s published their famous commentary in 1917 and from London, England, the Nation of Islam used this commentary to create their kufr.

Over the years, they began to prepare murrabi’s who would happily write books on behalf of the Khalifa. From 1915 to 1947, the team consisted of Malik Ghulam Farid, Jalal ud Din Shams, Mufti Muhammad Sadiq, Bashir Ahmad Rafiq, Zafrullah Khan, Shaikh Yacub Ali Irfani, Maulvi Sher Ali, Hafiz Roshan Ali, Abdur Rahim Nayyar, Ismail Halalpuri, Mirza Bashir Ahmad and Maulana Abul Ata aka Maulana Abul Ata Jalandhari. This culminated in 1947, Malik Ghulam Farid (1897–1977), was deputed the task of preparing various commentaries on the Quran, in urdu and english. His urdu commentaries were ascribed to the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad and appeared with only nine chapters along with an introduction in 1947, the Khalifa signed off on the introduction on 2-28-1947, thus it was published in late February from Qadian, British-India.

Continue reading “The 2nd Khalifa also used a team of ghost-writers”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his ghost writers called the sahaba as fools (nadaan)

In terms of 3:144, MGA and his ghost writers had always argued that the sahaba knew that Eisa (As) was dead. However, after MGA died, and via BA5 (Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya part-5), the Khalifa, Maulvi Noorudin invented the idea that the sahaba believed that Eisa (as) was alive and were corrected by Abu Bakr upon the death of MGA. This argument can be found in Nusratul-Haqq [‘Help of God’], which is a sub-section of BA-5.

This wasn’t the first time that MGA disrespected the sahaba of Muhammad (saw), MGA disliked the name Fatima and saw it as a sign of sadness and pain. MGA also disrespected Fatima’s (ra) children, Hassan and Hussain. MGA also disrespected Ali (ra). MGA even called the killing of Maulvi Abdul Latif as greater than that of Imam Hussain. 

MGA even called Abu Hurraira as stupid (ghabi). Omar Khan explains how Mirza Ghulam Ahmad disrespected Muhammad (saw), Noah (as), Yusuf (as) and Esa (as). Mirza Ghulam Ahmad accused Esa (as) of getting oil massages by adulterous women. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad even said that if the people of Noah (as) had been given the amount of signs that he (MGA) had been given, those people wouldn’t have died terribly.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his ghost writers called the sahaba as fools (nadaan)”

Ahmadiyya leadership admitted (in the 1930’s) that MGA used lots of editors and ghost writers

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Maulvi Noorudin created Ahmadiyya as their collective brainchild.  MGA would have the dreams and make the wild claims and Noorudin would defend MGA and build a team of writers, imams and language scholars. MGA knew Noorudin from the 1870’s, they both had correspondance with Sir Syed in this era also, they were both also members of the famous Ahl-e-Hadith sect of Northern India, this sect never numbered more than 100,000 in British India in the late 1890’s, thus, almost everyone knew each other.  Here are some names of the main ghost writing team, Maulvi Abdul Karim, Maulvi Mufti Muhammad Sadiq, Maulvi Sher Ali and Hakim Fazl Din of Bhera. Some other people who came independently, yet still joined MGA’s team was Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi, who was also a member of the Ahl-e-Hadith sect, in fact, uptil his job with MGA, he worked for the founder of the Ahl-e-Hadith sect, Syed Nazeer Husain from Delhi and Siddiq Hasan Khan of Bhopal. Maulvi Muhammad Ali was another, however, he came via Khwaja Kamaluddin and the prominent Ahmadi’s of Lahore.
Continue reading “Ahmadiyya leadership admitted (in the 1930’s) that MGA used lots of editors and ghost writers”

MGA’s ghost writers argue on the prophethood of MGA in 1900


I wanted to post a reference from the writings of Mahmud Ahmad in 1915 as he argued that MGA was in fact a prophet, however, without law.

The reference

“At last that event did take place. In the year 1900, Maulavi ‘Abdul Karim, the preacher of the Friday sermon, gave a sermon in which he, used the words Nabi (Prophet) and Rasul (Messenger) for the Mirza. This caused great irritation to Maulavi Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan Amrohawi. When Maulavi ‘Abdul Karim came to know of this, he gave another Friday sermon in which be addressed the Mirza, requesting him to contradict his belief, if he was wrong in considering him to be a prophet and Messenger of God. After the Friday prayers were over, Maulavi ‘Abdul Karim caught hold of the skirt of the Mirza’s apparel and requested him to correct him in his beliefs if they were erroneous. The Mirza turned around and said that he, too, held the same belief. Meanwhile, Maulavi Muhammad Ahsan had been greatly agitated by the sermon and in anger was pacing the floor of the mosque. On Maulavi ‘Abdul Karim’s return, he began to quarrel with him. When their voices rose very high, the Mirza came out of his house and recited the Qur’anic verse: “O ye who believe! Don’t raise your Voice above the voice of the Prophet.”

(This event is based on the report of a speech of Sayyid Sarwar Shah Qadiani at an annual conference held in Qadian, and published in al- Fadhl, Vol. X, No. 51, dated january.4,1923)

(See also Haqiqat al- Nubuwat, p 124.[published in 1915])

MGA had multiple ghost-writers.  In this case, Maulvi Amrohi (who was the first payed Ahmadi-mullah), he didn’t know that MGA had finally claimed prophethood and Maulvi Abdul Kareem was ordered to pronounce it.  They proceeded to argue, then MGA quoted the Quran and thus claimed prophethood openly for the first time (summer 1900). However, he remained silent for an additional 1 1/2 years or roughly 14+ months.

Later on, after “Correction of an Error” was published, Maulvi Amrohi wrote a rebuttal to an inquiring mind who accused MGA of claiming prophethood, however, Maulvi Amrohi very tactfully only denied independent prophethood, he never even mentioned the “The Ummati-Nabi”.  Fast forward to 1914, Maulvi Amrohi nominated Mahmud Ahmad as Khalifa and sided with him in his first year of his Khilafat.  He even read Mahmud Ahmad’s 2 books on the subject of prophethood, i.e. Qaul al Fasl and Haqiqatun Nubuwwat, however, in the summer of 1915, he seems to have had a change of heart and denounced MGA’s claim of prophethood and deposed Mahmud Ahmad as Khalifa.  He then sided with the Lahori-Ahmadis and died in 1919 in this state.


Links and Related Essays


#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian


Was Noorudin the Ghost-writer of MGA?

This is a quick essay and referencing post that I wanted to create.  Here is the reference:

“””Many people used to say that his holiness, the Promised Messiah, did not know even Urdu and someone else wrote the books which were attributed to him. The others held even a worse opinion about his writing potentialities. They believed that Shaikh Nuruddin was the person who wrote the books for him.” (Al-Fadl, February 5, 1929; by Mirza Mahmood Ahmad Qadiani)””””

Links and Related Essays


#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

The 1924 Jalsa at Qadian

The Khalifa had just came back from his tour of the world (to London and back). His travel dates were July 12th, 1924 to November 24th, 1924 (see Tarikh e Ahmadiyya)(See also ROR of 2008). As soon as he returned to Qadian, he got all the reports of the “goings-on” while he was away. He received reports that his wife #2, Amtul Hai (age-24) was writing letters to various newspapers and telling them how bad her husband was. When the Khalifa returned from his tour of Europe in 1924, the daughter of Noorudin died mysteriously (his wife). The front page of Al-fazal 20 Dec 1924, it says “final moments of Syeda Amtul Hai (also spelled Amtul Haye).

Nevertheless, the Jalsa was held on the 26th-28th (See ROR of March-1925). Ahmadiyya sources claim that the 2nd Khalifa gave a 4 hour speech on Bahaism (which special focus on his claim to divinity) on the first day and a 6 hour speech on Naimatullah Khan and his state killing in Afghanistan. The 2nd Khalifa’s full team of ghost writers where there: Qasim Ali, Mufti Muhammad Sadiq, Abdur Rahim Nayyar, Abdur Rahman Misri, Maulavi Syed Sarwar Shah, Zafrullah Khan, Fateh Muhammad Sial, Ghulam Rasool Rajecki and Hafiz Raushan Ali and the ROR reports that they gave lectures.

Ahmadiyya sources claim that 15,000 to 16,000 attendees were recorded and that 600 people converted to Ahmadiyya on the spot, which is a lie.

Continue reading “The 1924 Jalsa at Qadian”

The Smyth-Piggot essay from the of March 27, 2010

In 2009, Akber Chaudhary and Shahid Kamal had found MGA’s warning to Piggot from 1902. Tahir Hussain wrote an essay about it and had it published on March 27th, 1902 (we have archived that in the below) This essay prompted Tahir Ijaz to write an essay on Piggot in the Ahmadiyya Gazette (which seems to have been published in May of 2010 and dated as March-April)(see in the below).

Continue reading “The Smyth-Piggot essay from the of March 27, 2010”

FullMetal Theist totally exposed Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and #Ahmadiyya

In this video, a Sunni brother with the title of FullMetal Theist has exposed Ahmadiyya in many ways. Our brother FullMetal Theist begins by a question, do Muslim’s believe that the Promised Messiah is Jesus (as). Technically, there is no such term in Islam, i.e. “Promised Messiah”. Nevertheless, FullMetal Theist present the famous hadith from no other than Abu Hurairah (whom MGA called stupid, ghabi and nadaan). In fact, Abu Hurairah warned us about people like Mirza Ghulam Ahmad via a famous narration from Muhammad (Saw). FullMetal Theist then explains this specific hadith, which via Sahih Bukhari. He then explains how MGA claimed to be the metaphoric return of Jesus (as), because he isn’t Jesus (as), thus, MGA had no other choice and as a result of that, they believe that Jesus (as) is dead and that he died in India.

FullMetal Theist then presents a famous sahih hadith from Muslim wherein again Abu Hurairah is the key narrator. Nevertheless, he is quoted as saying that Jesus (as) would perform Hajj or Umra, or both, and would emerge from valley of Rauha (a valley near Medina). In the 1960’s, the Ahmadiyya Movement produced Malfuzat and made a mockery of this hadith via MGA.

FullMetal Theist then explains how MGA claimed to be the Mahdi. He presents the famous hadith from Abu Daud, wherein it is stated by Muhammad (saw) that a man from his family, who’s father would also be named Abdullah. In fact, Abu Bakr (ra) and Umar (ra) are also quoted in this situation and thus, there are 3-4 sahaba attesting to the fact that the Mahdi would emerge from the female bloodline of the prophet {via Fatima (ra)} and spread justice in the world. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s father was named Mirza Ghulam Murtaza. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad admitted to all of this posthumously (1908), via Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol.5, see pages 477-478). FullMetal Theist then quotes MGA from 1891, via Izala Auham, and MGA was claiming that many Mahdi’s might come.

FullMetal Theist then explains how these beliefs is what has caused mainstream Islam to denounce the Ahmadiyya movement altogether. He then sets out to explain what standards Mirza Ghulam Ahmad gave for prophethood (the Ahmadi standard). Mirza Ghulam Ahmad created many standards in his writings. These were all in terms of prophethood and via prophecies. In other words, MGA presented his prophecies as proof of his prophethood (see Noah’s Ark by MGA). MGA even said that to judge his truthfulness, he should be judged by his prophecies. MGA said that even if one of his prophecies failed, he was a total liar. MGA even said that his GOD controls his tongue, and thus, everything MGA says is from his GOD.

FullMetal Theist explains the story of MGA vs. Piggot which started in 1902. FullMetal Theist explains how MGA clearly said that Piggot would die in his lifetime and failed. FullMetal Theist quotes an article by Tahir Ijaz in the Ahmadiyya Gazette of Canada from 2010. He explains how this PDF was removed by the Ahmadiyya Movement. However, the specific letter of MGA can be found in other places. Nevertheless, Tahir Ijaz argued in 2010 that Piggot had totally retracted his public claims, and thus outlived MGA by almost 20 years (1927). FullMetal Theist easily disproves the idea that Piggot retracted his public claims by showing scans from newspapers dated as 1904, 1905 and 1908. MGA then died on May 26, 1908, and in 1909, Piggot again made his claims public (see the British newspaper archive).

FullMetal Theist then begins to explain the “A virgin and a widow” prophecy by MGA (from Tiryaq ul Qulub, 1899-1902 era). FullMetal Theist makes a minor mistake when he says that Tadhkirah is a book by MGA, technically, it isn’t. FullMetal Theist explains how MGA saw half of this prophecy fulfilled in 1884 and was awaiting the second part of it to be fulfilled in the future. FullMetal Theist then shows the bogus explanation by the only college educated child of MGA, Mirza Bashir Ahmad. Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued in 1934-1935 (when Tadhkirah was first collected and printed) that this prophecy was fulfilled, and gave a lame excuse and thus, this is another failed prophecy.

FullMetal Theist then presents his final failed prophecy, “the boy who was never born” aka The Failed Prophecy of MGA regarding the Birth of a Son to Pir Manzur Muhammad 1906-1908. FullMetal Theist explains how MGA totally failed. He then explains how MGA re-interpreted Islam literature as metaphors and then worked himself in. He then explains how in April of 1974, the Muslim World League declared Ahmadi’s to be outside of Islam.

Continue reading “FullMetal Theist totally exposed Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and #Ahmadiyya”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad totally disrespected Abu Hurairah

Abu Hurairah warned Muslims about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. He transmitted from Muhammad (Saw) that many Dajjal’s would appear and present hadith that no one has heard. Thus, MGA appeared and never even mentioned the name of Abu Hurairah until 1901-1902, when he cursed at him, called him stupid, and totally disrespected his legacy and took the Shia route. However, this is egregious, since Abu Hurrairah is the most prolific companion of Muhammad (saw) in terms of hadith transmission.

The story is as follows, initially, in the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya (1879-1884), MGA quoted a hadith about 62:3, MGA didn’t properly explain, as was his normal style. Nevertheless, this is the famous hadith by Abu Hurairah wherein Salma Farsi is mentioned as well as the Pleides. MGA used this verse (62:3) of the Quran to argue that he brought the Quran back to earth after it had left in the 1857 mutiny. This was in 1882, via the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3. MGA never wrote the name Abu Hurrairah in any book of the 1880’s. Even in 1891-1892, when MGA made his wildest claims, he quoted another hadith by Abu Hurrairah wherein the Messiah was supposed to live an additional 40 years, and thus, MGA made his age-prophecy, which failed miserably. Even the hadith about the two yellow garments is from Abu Hurrairah, and the hadith about the last brick, and the hadith about the Imam Mahdi will be amongst the Muslims (imamukum minkum), and how the Messiah won’t lead prayers, all of these are from Abu Hurrairah.

Why did MGA then call Abu Huraira as stupid? The reason was because there was a famous hadith in Bukhari, which was also quoted by Tafsir Ibn Kathir, wherein it is proves that Esa (As) hasn’t died yet. It is posted below. It all started in 1902, when MGA was forced to comment on the famous hadith of Abu Hurrairah wherein he told the world that 4:159 was about the physical return of Eisa (As) and how Eisa (As) would die upon his second return. Again in 1907, via Haqiqatul Wahy, MGA attacked the credibility of Abu Hurrairah. After MGA died, Braheen e Ahmadiyya Vol. 5 was published, in this book, MGA claimed that the beliefs of Abu Hurraira (ra) would lead Muslims to shirk. Last thing, 
Who is Abu Huraira?

In Sunni Islam, Abū Hurayrah al-Dawsiyy al-Zahrāniyy (Arabicأبو هريرة الدوسي الزهراني‎‎; 603–681), often spelled Abu Hurairah, was one of the sahabah (companions) of Muhammad and, according to Sunni Islamthe most prolific narrator of hadith. He was known by the kunyah Abu Hurayrah “Father of the Kitten”, in reference to his documented attachment to cats. However, his real name is differed upon, with the most popular opinion being that it was ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Ṣakhr (عبد الرحمن بن صخر). Abu Hurayrah spent four years in the company of Muhammad and went on expeditions and journeys with him. It is estimated that he narrated around 5374 Ahadith.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad totally disrespected Abu Hurairah”

Up ↑