Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"sir syed"

In the early 1860’s, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote Sir Syed Ahmad Khan a few letters


Intro

I have written extensively about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his “theft” of the ideas of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan of Aligarh.  Whether Esa (As) was alive or dead was a “dead” issue in Islamic thought for over 1000 years, then Sir Syed Ahmad Khan wrote his commentary of the Quran in 1880, and had already been writing publicly that Esa (as) was dead in the 1870’s.  In this entry, I am adding some new information to this story.  Afzal Upal has revealed in his book on Ahmadiyya that MGA was actually writing letters to Sir Syed back in the early 1860’s, when he was employed in Sialkot (see page 112).

The reference
“””Since Mirza Sahib liked to debate Christian clerics, Murad Beg who used the nom de guerre
of Mirza Shikasta (and later on Muwahid) and was a resident of Jallandhar, told him, “Syed
Ahmad Khan has written an exegesis of Torah and Injil. If you write to him it may be helpful.”
Thus Mirza Sahib wrote a letter to Sir Syed in Arabic”””. (Shahid, 1958: 97).  See Shahid, Dost Muhammad (1958). Tareekh-e-Ahmadiyyat. Rabwah: Idarat-ul-Musanifeen.

Sir Syed Ahmad Khan argued from the Quran that Esa (As) was dead (1882)

See the scan-work

Sir Syed was the first Muslim in India to ever say that all hadith on the Mahdi were weak…MGA copied

Intro
Like I have written before, MGA and his team copied from Sir Syed on almost every single topic, except Jesus in India, that was tooo ridiculous for any human to conjure up.  In this specific case, I have a scan from the writings of Sir Syed, pre–1891, wherein he says that all hadith on the Mahdi are weak and unreliable.

The scan from tahdheeb al ikhlaaq, vol -7, August 1877

 Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/16/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-called-muhammad-saw-as-the-perfect-mahdi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/16/imam-suyuti-on-tawaffa/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/11/initially-mga-was-downgrading-all-hadith-on-the-mahdi-1890-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/25/the-ahmadiyya-fraud-on-eclipses-and-the-mahdi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/09/some-hadith-that-prove-that-the-mahdi-and-esa-as-are-two-separate-people/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/09/hadith-on-the-mahdi-scans-and-etc/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Sir Syed’s view on Esa (as)–1882

Intro
Obviously, MGA took all of his theories on religion from other people.  Sir Syed began publishing his commentary of the Quran in 1880, however, the section which concerns Esa (as) was published (see Nuzhat Haneef) in 1882, MGA almost immediately began calling himself as “like-esa”.  It’s important to note that it was Noorudin who urged MGA to do so. Later on, MGA also copied Sir Syed’s swoon theory and passed it off as his own (see Jesus in India, 1908).  MGA also attracted lots of people who were already following Sir Syed’s new ideas on Islam, Like Maulvi Abdul Karim and others.

The Quotes
i. “Now we must turn to the Holy Quran to see what it says. The Quran makes mention of Jesus’ death in four places … Firstly in Sura Aal Imran, secondly in Sura Ma’ida, … thirdly in Sura Maryam … fourthly in Sura Nisa’. Jesus was not killed by the Jews, either by stoning or by crucifixion, but he died his natural death, and God raised him in rank and status … From the first three verses it is clear that Jesus died a natural death. However, as the Ulama of Islam had followed the Christians, in accepting that Jesus had gone up to heaven alive, before looking at the Quran, so they have tried to interpret some of the words in these verses to accord with their unsound belief.”

(Tafsir Ahmadi by Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, vol. ii, p.48)

ii. Referring to the expression ‘in this’ (Arabic: bi-hi) in the verse: ‘And there is none of the People of the Book but will believe in this before his death’ (4:159), which is generally taken to mean in him (i.e. in Jesus) Sir Syed writes:

“This points to the words ‘And their saying: we have killed the Messiah’ [4:157], and to their saying, and not to the Messiah. So this means: ‘All the People of the Book, before their death, will believe that Jesus was killed’. After this it is said: ‘And on the day of Judgment he, i.e. Jesus, will be a witness against them’. The word ‘ala [‘against’] is used to indicate loss or harm. So the meaning is that on the day of Judgment Jesus will be a witness against their belief.”

(Maktub Sir Syed, No. 2, p. 48)

iii. “Jesus spent his early life migrating from one place to another. His later life was not very long, for he was 33 years of age when he died, and at that time there were only 70 people who believed in him.”

(The Ali Garh Magazine, Intikhab No. 1971, p. 48)

See the lahori website.  I copy and pasted from there. 

Noorudin and Abdul Karim were influenced by Sir Syed

Intro
As we all know, Noorudin, Maulvi Abdul Karim and MGA were all influenced by the writings of Sir Syed.  Sir Syed denied all miracles in Islam by 1880, he denied the Islamic creation theory, the return of Esa (as), the arrival of the Mahdi, the physicality of the Mir’aj, all the hadith work, etc etc etc.  Obviously, Noorudin and Abdul Karim knew each other in 1880 and in the below I present data which proves this fact.

The Quote
“””Humble servant (yaqoob Ali) narrates that Hazrat Moulvi Nurdin Khalifa Awal- in the beginning also was influenced by the thoughts and ways of Sir Syed. But in the company, and training of Hazrat Sahib (MGA) -slowly the impression of sir syed washed away. Moulvi Abdul Karim also in the beginning were fond of Sir Syed.”””
14725474_1635113160121516_3441849895767826467_n

Nuzhat Haneef
She wrote about this topic in her book.  Feel free to review that.

Other Data
Lahori-Ahmadis confirmed that Abdul Karim was influenced by Sir Syed (See the HOPE bulletin, Feb 2008).

Afzal Upal references
He mentions that MGA defended the Orthodox views on the return of Esa (as), as opposed to Sir Syed (M. A. Upal, Towards a computational science of culture, in Proceedings of the27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, page 2568, Lawrence Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2005). 

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/06/the-life-and-death-of-maulvi-abdul-karim-sialkoti/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/06/per-mga-noorudin-was-worth-1000-maulvi-abdul-karim-sialkotis/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/dr-abdul-hakim-khan-patialvi-mentions-the-death-of-maulvi-abdul-karim-in-his-correspondence-with-mga/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/hope/2008/hope200802_abdulkarimsialkotipromisedmessiah.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/08/the-agonizing-death-of-maulvi-abdul-karim-sialkoti-1905/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/12/lecture-sialkot-was-delivered-by-maulvi-abdul-kareem-not-mga-1904/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/maulvi-abdul-kareem-claims-prophethood-per-mga-maulvi-amrohi-disagrees/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/24/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-knew-maulvi-abdul-karim-since-the-mid-1860s-in-sialkot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/24/noorudin-and-abdul-karim-were-influenced-by-sir-syed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/17/ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-the-first-bait-ceremony-in-1889/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/02/mufti-muhammad-sadiq-was-a-student-of-noorudin-pre-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/27/maulvi-abdul-kareem-lived-exclusively-with-mga-on-the-3rd-floor-of-mgas-house/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/24/the-wife-of-maulvi-abdul-karim-sialkoti-zainab-bibi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/17/how-i-became-an-ahmadi-by-dr-basharat-ahmad-the-famous-lahori-ahmadi-who-wrote-mujadid-e-azam/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/25/some-brief-notes-on-the-philosophy-of-the-teachings-of-islam-aka-islami-usool-ki-falasifi-1896/

https://www.alislam.org/r.php?q=Shadi%20Khan

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1905.pdf

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Sialkot #Mosqueattack

 

The Ahmadi-cleric, Maulvi Syed Muhammad Sarwar Shah was an opium addict!!!–Nu’mani, Sirajulhaq (1915). Tazkiratul Mahdi. Qadian, India: Zia-ul-Islam Press



Intro

My team recently found a rare book written by Ahmadis, and about Ahmadis and from the earliest period in Ahmadiyya.  Its called Tazkiratul Mahdi, it was written by Sahibzada Sirajul Haq, and very early on in this history of Ahmadiyya, in fact, Upal recently quoted it.  Nu’mani, Sirajulhaq (1915). Tazkiratul Mahdi. Qadian, India: Zia-ul-Islam Press. See Upal’s bibliography, page 128 of the book.  His grandson married a daughter of Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad.

Summary of the quote
Molvi Syed Muhammad Sarwar Shah was a opium Addict. Pir Sirajul Haq Nu’mani writes in his book Tazkiratul Mahdi page 7 part 1 that Molvi Syed Muhammad Sarwar Shah used opium in great quantity. But he left it at the time of Baiat with MGAQ.

When did Sarwar Shah join Ahmadiyya? 
He wasn’t on the list of 313 Ahmadis in 1896.  He seems to have joined some time between 1899–1904.  He was a Deobandi-type-of Muslim before then.  Later on, he became an official ghost writer and companion of MGA, and then a teacher of Mahmud Ahmad, who eventually became the Khalifa in 1914.

Sarwar Shah hated the Lahori-Ahmadis
Sarwar Shah must have been told to write fake stories about the enemies of the Qadianis.

See TADHKIRAH, 2009 EDITION, PAGE 1058

Hadrat Khalifatul Masih IIra related the following dream of the Promised Messiahas in his speech:

There was a throne laid out on the top of the small mosque and I was sitting on it and with me was Maulavi Nur-ud- Din. One person (whose name need not be disclosed)1271 began to attack us wildly. I said to someone: ‘Catch hold of him and expel him from the mosque.’ He pushed him down the stairs and he went away running. Bear in mind that the interpretation of a mosque is the community.

[Barakat-e-Khilafat, Speech of Hadrat Khalifatul Masih IIra, p. 31]

1271—-Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: In his book Kashful-Ikhtilaf, Hadrat Maulavi Sayyed Sarwar Shahra (published February 1920, page 12) records this dream and adds that the man was Khwajah Kamal-ud-Din. When he was proposing a pact with the newspaper Watan, the Promised Messiahas said that he had seen dreams of warnings about him.

The scans

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/17/nooruddin-treated-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-for-impotency-and-many-others-with-opium/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/08/mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-poisoned-as-a-child-then-had-many-mental-issues/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/30/mga-and-his-team-mixed-sauternes-wine-with-his-foods-and-medicines-at-qadian/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/03/a-newspaper-the-lancet-calls-mga-a-blasphemous-idiot-1898/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/03/the-british-government-banned-ahmadiyya-medicines-in-1899/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-plommers-wine-shop/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/07/mgas-teachers-were-opium-addicts-2/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/14/mga-looked-like-an-opium-addict/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/03/mgas-tried-to-cure-plague-in-british-india-with-a-super-opium-medicine-that-didnt-work/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/05/07/mirza-tahir-ahmad-glosses-over-the-opium-issue/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/21/tiryaq-e-ilahi-never-worked-on-anyone-it-was-just-a-super-opium-drug/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/10/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-used-poison-opium-and-wine-in-his-medicines/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/14/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-high-in-opium-247/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-overdosing-on-opium-everyday/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-liked-his-opium-sprinkled-into-his-lassi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/08/13/mga-lied-about-his-opium-use/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/21/ahmadiyya-homeopathy-is-an-obvious-fraud/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/16/ahmadiyya-leadership-was-selling-weird-medicines-in-1939-which-claimed-to-guarantee-a-son-to-any-man/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/25/was-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-wife-a-concubine-aka-laundi-of-noorudin/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/11/26/mirza-ghulam-loved-to-have-multiple-women-on-his-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-addicted-to-paan-beetle-leef/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/16/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-suffered-from-hysteria-and-convulsions-and-his-wife-and-his-son-mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-the-2nd-khalifa/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-prescribed-alcohol-for-ahmadis-to-take/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/30/what-is-zadham-e-ishq-aka-the-love-potion/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Who is Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi? 1840-1920

Intro
Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi (1840-1920) was a contemporary of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in the Punjab.  They were both born during the the last 8-9 years of Sikh rule and were under the Ramgharia Misl, which was annexed into the greater Sikh Empire in roughly 1816 by Ranjit Singh.  They were both educated by the same teachers as British rule began in roughly 1850.  Their parents also knew each other, when MGA’s family went to Batala, they always stayed at the ancestoral home of Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi.  They were both Ahl-e-Hadith Muslims aka Wahabis.  In 1878 Batalvi started the Ishaat us Sunnah magazine and gave MGA space to market his new book-series, the Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya.  In 1881, Batalvi gave MGA an exhaustive review and supported MGA’s work via the Ahl-e-Hadith.  In 1884, when MGA wanted to get married, Batalvi had a list of young girls with him and shared it with MGA, this is how they found out about the daughter of Mir Nasir Nawab.  The Ahl-e-Hadith grew weary of MGA in late 1884 and some even called MGA a Kafir, since MGA was boasting about divine revelations in his book series (the Braheen), neverthless, Batalvi stuck up for MGA yet again.  By 1889 they became enemies, since MGA claimed to be the second coming of Esa (as).  They organized debates with each other and jousted from their magazines until 1899, when the British government stepped in and absolved MGA and forced Batalvi to never insult MGA ever again (by calling him kafir or otherwise).  His disputes with Ahmadiyya seem to have ended here.  However, he did have a famous debate with a Quranist in 1902 and his sons were found at Qadian in 1910, later on they recanted and left Ahmadiyya.

The 1850’s
MGA and Batalvi used some of the same teachers and were classmates at many times, most likely in Batala.

1860–1869
Batalvi studied Hadith, logic and grammar from Molvi Syed Nazeer Husain (1805-1901).  The same Maulvi that read MGA’s nikkah in 1884.

1869
After his mother died, and MGA completed his punishment, MGA returned to Qadian from Sialkot.  MGA abruptly visits Batala and almost has a debate with Batalvi, however, MGA comments that he agrees with everything Batalvi is saying (see BA4, pages 399-400).  Batalvi  had finished his studies on islam and as now an imam-proper.  This entire scenario happened in a mosque in Batala (see Dard, page 54).

1878
He starts his newspaper, Ishaat us Sunnah, which runs until 1900 and then goes missing.  It seems to have been replaced with a new newspaper, the “Ahl-i-Hadis”.  Which was edited by Maulvi Sanaullah.

1882
MGA mentions batalvi in BA3, on page 7 of the online english edition.  They seem to be very good friends.  MGA claims that Batalvi works as a secretary of the Anjuman-i-Hamdardi Islamia, Lahore.  Which is most likely the Anjuman Himayat-i Islam.  Maybe out of respect, MGA wrote it the way he did.

1884-MGA mentioned Batalvi in BA4
On pages 399-400, MGA remembers his debate with Batalvi that never happened.

1884 
Batalvi gives MGA’s Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya series a glowing review, however, after the 4th volume is published, the Ahl-e-Hadith Muslims call MGA a Kafir.  Batalvi sticks up for MGA in this era and claims that MGA is not claiming prophethood, only divine revelations.

1887
The magazine became quite popular and was recognized by notable scholars and Government Officials. When Sir Charles Umpherston Aitchison, Governor of the Punjab from 1882-1887, left the area in April 1887, he gave Muhammad Hussain, a certificate testifying to his ability and learning. Muhammad Hussain proudly records this fact (See ‘ Isha‘atus Sunnah’ Vol. 20, No. 3).

1888
MGA mentions Batalvi on page 20 of “The Green Announcement”.  They seem to still be friends up to this point.  MGA even refers to him an “eminent person”, we are not sure what the Urdu word is here for “eminent person”.

1889
Batalvi begins to question MGA and his claims of being the second coming of Esa (as).  This spills over into the early part of 1890.

1891
A full blown war breaks out between MGA and Batalvi.  They arrange to debate each other in Ludhiana, however, MGA requests the British government to intervene and save him.  This debate lasted for twelve days, from 20 July – 31 July 1891.  The venue was the ‘Masjid Awanan’ (Awana’s Mosque) at Ludhiana.  This was a written debate, wherein someone other then MGA read out MGA’s (alleged) writings.  The written papers of both sides were later published by MGA as Al-Haq Mubahathah Ludhiana (Urdu). [i.e. Truth: the Ludhiana Debate].  Batalvi goes around the Punjab and gets the majority of the Ulema to pass a Fatwa of Kufr on MGA.

1892
MGA mentions Batalvi extensively in his book, ‘Nishan Asmani’ in english as “Heavenly Signs”.

March 17th, 1892
On roughly March 17th, 1891, MGA predicts that Batalvi would die in 40 days time or would suffer a major tragedy.  It expires on April 27th and Batalvi is fine, Batalvi then writes about it in his newspaper, this prediction isn’t published by MGA until 1893, in a book called, Aina Kamalat e Islam at page 601-604.

May 4th, 1893
MGA publishes a prophecy about Batalvi, that would he repent and stop calling MGA a Kafir and etc (see page 39).  Ahmadi’s claim that this was fulfilled when the British Government ordered him to never call MGA or Ahmadi’s as Kafirs ever again in 1899 and it was manifested in 1911-1913 era, when he was called to court to testify about Ahmadi’s.

Oct-Dec 1898
He claims that MGA broke the law and conducted a prophecy vs. himself.  Even though MGA is guilty, the British government absolves MGA.  MGA issues another prophecy against Batalvi, MGA claims that Batalvi will be disgraced by Feb 1900.

1902
Ahmadiyya sources tell us that In November of 1902 a debate took place between Muhammad
Hussain Batalavi and ‘Abdullah Chakrhalavi on the importance and position of the Holy Quran and the hadith.  Chakrhalavi was the founder of the Ahl-e-Quran sect of North India, he died in 1931.

1905
In Lecture Ludhiana, MGA mentions Batalvi, and even says that he visited Qadian often from roughly 1855–1889.  MGA also mentions the case of 1898 wherein Capt. Le Marchand saved MGA from going to jail.

1907
MGA and his team publish a dream of MGA wherein it seems that Batalvi will convert to Ahmadiyya. It seems that MGA was still hoping that Batalvi would eventually accept MGA as the Messiah (See 2009 Online edition of Tadhkirah, pages 949-950).

1910
2 of his children seem to have been taken to Qadian by Ahmadi’s and forcibly converted to Ahmadiyya.  Later on they recanted.  He also appears as a witness in some Ahmadiyya related cases.

1920
Batalvi dies.

1931
Ahmadi’s publish: “Batalvi Ka Anjam” by Mir Qasim Ali.

1937
The son of Batalvi writes a book about MGA called “The useless Prophet”.

2019
Via twitter, Ahmadi’s share info that some of the great grandsons of Batalvi have become Ahmadi.

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/out-of-fear-from-ahmadis-and-mgas-fake-prophecies-batalvi-registered-to-buy-a-gun-1898-1899-but-was-denied/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Conclusive-Argument-Islam.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/13/what-is-raz-e-haqiqat-in-english-as-a-hidden-truth/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya-Part-4.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molvi_Muhammad_Hussain_Batalvi

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/07/mgas-teachers-were-opium-addicts-2/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/03/a-young-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-stole-his-daddys-pension-money-and-was-punished-by-never-being-able-to-see-his-mother-again/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/TheHeavenlySign.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/29/what-is-the-ishaat-us-sunnah-the-ahle-hadith-newspaper-edited-muhammad-hussain-batlavi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/20/ishaat-us-sunnah-the-ahle-hadith-newspaper-some-quotes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/19/ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-the-age-of-mgas-second-wife/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/30/batalvi-ka-anjam-by-mir-qasim-ali-1931/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/30/nikama-nabi-or-the-useless-prophet-by-babu-ghulam-mustafa-sb-son-of-muhammad-hussain-batalvi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-considered-a-kafir-in-1884-before-his-wild-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/26/did-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claim-to-be-the-messiah-in-1889/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-accused-of-claiming-prophethood-in-the-1879-1884-era/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/mirza-ghulams-ahmad-lecture-in-amritsar-nov-1905-was-not-a-lecture-it-was-a-riot/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/15/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-debate-with-batalvi-summer-of-1891-was-stopped-by-the-british-govt-on-mgas-behalf/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/out-of-fear-from-ahmadis-and-mgas-fake-prophecies-batalvi-registered-to-buy-a-gun-1898-1899-but-was-denied/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/10/the-fatwa-e-kufr-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/01/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-batalvi-1891-1892-era-mga-sent-10-lanats-on-batalvi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/out-of-fear-from-ahmadis-and-mgas-fake-prophecies-batalvi-registered-to-buy-a-gun-1898-1899-but-was-denied/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/31/batalvi-sent-some-of-his-children-to-qadian-for-schooling/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/ReviewBatalaviChakrhalavi.pdf

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/The-Green-Announcement.pdf

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Al-Bushra, a manuscript compiled by Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘mani

Intro
This book, Al-Bushra, is an old manuscript, which seems to have been an unpublished collection of Revelations that was collected by a close companion of MGA named Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘mani.  Parts of it are still written in the 2009 online edition of Tadkhirah.

Quotes from Al-Bushra, as given in the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah

1—-Translation [Arabic] “”””Even some men are not comparable to this girl.”””

*****Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shams ra: This revelation was
received at the birth of the Promised Messiahas’s daughter Sahibzadi
‘Ismat. (See Tadhkirah, 2009 online edition, page 1014).

2——[Arabic] “””Then the book was brought and they were defeated.”””

[al-Bushra, p. 55,}((See Also, 209 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1016)))

3——-On Monday after the Zuhar Prayer the Promised Messiahas
received the revelation:

“”””That is [Arabic] Be occupied with the worship of God, tasbih, tahlil, takbir, darud, and istighfar etc., throughout this night because this night is the most beautiful and wonderful night of all nights.”””

[al-Bushra, p. 66]((See Also, 209 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1026&1027)))

4—–in roughly 1896/1897
Pir Sirajul-Haqq writes:
“””In 1314 AH. when my daughter Sajidah was about to be born, I had been commanded by the Promised Messiahas to lead the five daily Prayers and Jumu‘ah [Friday Prayer]. In the Friday sermon, I recited the surah al-Mu’minun [Chapter 23] up to . The following day the Promised Messiahas said to me: When you recited the verses of surah al-Mu’minun, they were also being conveyed to me as revelation as you recited them. This address of yours proved acceptable to God.”””

[al-Bushra, compiled by Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘manira, p. 76 footnote]((See Also, 209 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 1030)))

5——-In roughly 1900
Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘mani narrates that one day at the time of the Fajr Prayer, the Promised Messiahas said:

A short while ago, I received a unique revelation which I could not decipher. First I received the revelation:

“””[Urdu] Senior aunt came””””

I have no senior aunt, whether of direct relationship or of distant relationship. But my children have a senior aunt but she is opposed to me. Then I received the revelation:

“”””[Urdu] A telegram has been received.””””

[al-Bushra, manuscript, p. 113 footnote]

Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: Hadrat Amirul Mo’minin Khalifatul Masih IIaba states: There are three prophecies in this revelation. First, that there would be a Khalifah from among the children of the Promised Messiahas. Second, that the senior aunt of his children would join the Jama‘at at that time, and the third prophecy was about the longevity of the senior aunt …that she would survive until that time and would take the pledge of allegiance at the hand of a Khalifah from the children of the Promised Messiahas. [Friday Sermon delivered by Hadrat Khalifatul Masih IIra, published in al-Fadl, vol.15, no. 47, December 9, 1927, p. 8]

Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: The name of the respected senior aunt was Hurmat Bibi, and she was the widow of Mirza Ghulam Qadir, the elder brother of the Promised Messiahas. In 1916, she took a pledge of allegiance at the hand of Hadrat Khalifatul Masih IIra (See al-Fadl, volume 3, number 94, March 4, 1916) She died on December 1, 1927 at the age of 97. She was a musiyah and buried in the special enclosure of Bahishti-Maqbarah. [al-Fadl, vol. 15, no. 47, December 9, 1927, pp. 5–8]

Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: ‘A telegram has been received’ meant that Allah the Almighty was conveying the news with a heavenly telegram. [See al-Fadl, vol. 15, no. 47, December 9, 1927, pp. 5–8].

6——-

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Numani

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/10/some-strange-revelations-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-were-recorded-in-a-book-called-al-bushra/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/15/what-is-tazkiratul-mahdi-by-pir-siraj-ul-haq-numani-1915/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/15/the-ahmadi-mullah-maulvi-syed-muhammad-sarwar-shah-was-an-opium-addict-numani-sirajulhaq-1915-tazkiratul-mahdi-qadian-india-zia-ul-islam-press/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/17/angels-dance-and-sing-for-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

Some scans from Al-Bushra

 

 

Syed Abdul Latif accompanied MGA to Jhelum in January of 1903



Intro

In terms of Syed Abdul Latif, Ahmadiyya editors/writers refuse to mention that this guy was given money from the govt. of Afghanistan to go for Hajj, however, he misappropriated those funds and when to Qadian and probably gave MGA the money (See the Afghan Martyrs, by Bashir Ahmad Rafiq 1995, page 45).  The picture in the above is from the Al-Hakam website,  A single page agreement was signed on this day, which gave birth to the famous Durand Line (borderline between Afghanistan and Pakistan). This accord was reached between Sir Mortimer Durand, a British diplomat and civil servant of the British Raj, and Abdur Rahman Khan, the Afghan Amir, to fix the limit of their respective spheres of influence and improve diplomatic relations and trade. The Afghan side was represented by Hazrat Sahibzada Abdul Latifra (who later did Bai‘at of Hazrat Ahmadas and was martyred in Kabul) with others dignitaries. The original 1893 agreement was written in English, with translated copies in Dari.

An additional reference that we need to find
Frank Martin, an Italian engineer serving at that time in Kabul, was a witness to the whole event. He writes:

    “This new man (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani), therefore, if his preaching was listened to, would upset Muhammadanism, and as he preached that Mussalmans must regard Christians as brothers, and not as infidel, this would render useless the Amir’s chief weapon, Jehad (religious war), in case of English or Russian aggression. So the Amir, when he heard of all this, sent word to the Moullah (Latif) to return, and the Moullah did so, preaching the new religion as he came and as soon as he was well within the boundaries of the country, he was made prisoner and brought to Kabul.”

Frank A Martin Under the Absolute Amir , Harper and Brothers, London, 1907, p. 203.

Links and Related Essays
http://www.alhakam.org/9-15-november

Up ↑