ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
In 1891, after MGA planned to make his wildest claims, he began by twisting 30 verses of the Quran. In early 1891, MGA published “Victory of Islam”(published on Jan-22, 1891, see Muhammad Ali), which was followed by “Elucidation of Objectives” (published on Jan-22, 1891, see Muhammad Ali). The 3rd book of MGA after his wild claims is Izala Auham (published in September of 1891, see Muhammad Ali), this is where MGA twisted additional verses of the Quran. We have posted the full list in the below.

Upon review, it wasn’t just 30 verses of the Quran that MGA twisted in 1891, it was more, it was 58, since MGA added additional verses. However, MGA didn’t mention 39:42(39:43 in the qadiani quran), which is the most important verse in this debate, that is only if someone is looking for the truth. Furthermore, 95% of the verses that MGA and his team quoted have nothing to do with Eisa (As) and are simply general rules, these rules don’t apply to prophets/messengers.

Continue reading “In 1891, MGA twisted at least 30+ verses of the Quran, as he made his wild claims” →

Intro
In 1898, in MGA’s book, “Najm ul Huda”, MGA admitted that he was hated my his father and elder brother since he was lazy and ate opium all day and refused to work. Thus, MGA’s god caused MGA’s father (Mirza Ghulam Murtaza)(died at age 85) to die as well as MGA’s elder brother Mirza Ghulam Qadir (who died at roughly age 50). In fact, during MGA’s childhood, MGA’s father repeatedly called MGA a girlie-man. MGA’s father would not allow MGA to raise his own children. MGA was a momma’s boy, his mom would repeatedly save MGA and make sure that MGA never had to work. In 1864, MGA was sent to pickup his father’s pension money and squandered it all. This was the worst thing that MGA had ever done, he was thus punished by being forced to work in Sialkot in the courts and specifically to never see his mother again (who was blamed or MGA’s being useless and lazy). MGA’s mother died in 1868, after she died, a messenger was sent to Sialkot to bring MGA home, thus MGA’s punishment was complete, MGA even missed the funeral.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The quote

From the 2018 online edition of Tadhkirah

“””I had, by nature, a retiring disposition and did not take happily to meeting people, which bore heavily on me. My father was disappointed in me because of this and considered that I was like a guest in the house requiring only board and lodging and realized that I preferred to be left alone and was not happy in the company of people. He admonished me sharply over this and counselled me, day and night, openly and in secret, to try to make material progress and directed my attention to worldly attractions, but I was being drawn very strongly towards God. My brother was like my father in these matters and he also treated me in the same way. Allah the Almighty caused both of them to die, and did not prolong their lives and He revealed to me that:

[Arabic] This is the way it should have been, so that those who bear animosity to you may be
removed and you should not be hurt by their remonstrance.”””

1898
Najmul Huda

Scans

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essay’s

Who is Mirza Ghulam Murtaza (1791–1876)?

Who is Mirza Ghulam Qadir (1833–1883) ?

NAJMUL-HUDA, quotes and background info

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadi #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam

Intro
All Ahmadi’s want to talk about is 3:55 of the Quran and the alleged death of Eisa (as). Ahmadi’s will argue that it is obvious that Eisa (as) is dead, they give 30+ verses of the Quran and give other silly arguments. However, none of this proves that MGA is a prophet and the messiah, it is all a deflection. We immediately point out to them that MGA was 50 years old when all of a sudden, he claims to have figured that Eisa (as) has been dead this whole time, and the common belief (ijma) is wrong on Eisa (as). Continue reading “In 1884, before his wildest claims, MGA defined Inni-Mutawafeeka, wa Raffa as I shall give you full reward and shall raise you towards Me” →

Intro
Ahmadis will be seen running around making many false arguments. They are brainwashed to learn these arguments, so thus, they never listen or seek to understand why people don’t believe in Ahmadiyya, aka the Mirza family business. Even Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan tore of the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya and sent it back to Qadian in that condition, which enraged MGA. MGA was also accused of claiming prophethood by the Ahl-e-Hadith, only Batalvi defended him. I have written a full review of BA3 herein.

In 1902, MGA mentions this incident in “I’jaz-e-Ahmadi”, in english as “Miracle of Ahmad”, he mentions 3 ahl-e-hadith imam’s who called him Kafir: Muhammad, Abdul Aziz and Abdullah. MGA explains that they called him Kafir since MGA had named himself as Eisa (As) and ascribedall the prophecies of Eisa (as) onto himself. Maulvi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi argues on behalf of MGA and told Muhammad, Abdul Aziz and Abdullah (ahl-e-hadith imam’s from Ludhiana) that they were wrong with their assertions, since MGA was also claiming that Eisa (As) would physically return in the same book. However, time would tell, MGA was lying. He lied about his prophethood the same way.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was considered a Kafir in 1884, before his wildest claims” →

Intro
MGA denied prophethood as early as 1884, some ulema of India had already issued a Fatwa of Kufr. As we have recently learned, MGA was already claiming to be the Messiah in 1889, Ahmadiyya leadership has always suppressed this data, the Ahmadi-mullahs lie about almost everything in their pursuit of gainful employment. We can come across some additional data about MGA’s denial of prophethood in 1891, it is posted in the below. This is a longer story…MGA and his team denied prophethood until November of 1901, and even a bit earlier to the summer of 1900. A reader would have to be very well versed in the dynamic of the split to fully understand the brevity of this data. Finally, it should be noted that MGA and his team vehemently denied prophethood using the argument that the word prophet should be replaces in all of MGA’s books and revelations to muhaddas.
Continue reading “In 1891, when MGA made his big claims, he denied prophethood–Mufti Sadiq was heavily involved” →

Intro
There are countless sahih hadith on the return of Eisa (As) at the eastern minaret at Damascus (The Ummayad mosque)(too many to list).

It should be noted how Mirza Ghulam Ahmad prefaced all of his claims in the first 4 volumes of Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya. In BA-4 (See pages 373-374) MGA alleges to have received a revelation about revelations being sent down at Qadian, MGA did not give an explanation (he was called a Kafir). However, in roughly 1890 (published in 1918), and via a private letter from Maulvi Noorudin, MGA was convinced by Noorudin to forget about the hadith about Damascus and simply claim to be the Maseel-e-Maseeh (like of the Messiah)(See Maktubat-e-Ahmadiyyah Volume 5: Part II). Which MGA promptly did. In the same era (1890-1891), MGA wrote Izala Auham wherein he argued that his revelations in BA-4 about Qadian, actually meant Damascus, and in a weird way, Damascus=Qadian. MGA also addressed the other famous part of this hadith, the 2 yellow garments, when MGA made his wild claims in 1891, he said that this was metaphoric and only meant that the Messiah would not be in good health (see Izala Auham in the below).

By 1893-1894 (via Hamamatul Bushra), MGA was claiming that the word minaret=1400 years, in some weird concept of numerology, we were not able to figure out the math. It should be, Minaret=13x9x14x1x18x5x20 (see the ref in the below). However, this set of numbers doesn’t equal 1400.

By 1902, MGA and his team decided to build the minaret in Masjid Aqsa at Qadian, however, after lots of funds were collected, and they even made a list of the donor’s (See Dard), the minaret was not built, only the bottom part. MGA allegedly laid the foundation stone of the Minaratul Masih on March 13th, 1903. The 2nd Khalifa completed the building of the minaret in 1916-1917. The ROR of Aug-1932 has an extensive essay on the “Minarat ul Maseeh”. In 1939, the Mirza was accepting 100 rupees for Ahmadi’s to get their named written on it.

In 1924, the second Khalifa visited Damascusm Ahmadi mullah asserted that this completed a prophecy of MGA that he would visit the arab lands (See Tadhkirah).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the hadith about the Messiah descending at the eastern minaret of Damascus” →

Intro
Lekh Ram was born in 1858 in Jhelum, Punjab, British India. He was a police officer in Punjab and resigned from the government service voluntarily and devoted for propagation of Vedas even not caring for his family and only son too. He was influenced by the writings of Munshi Kanhaiya Lal Alakhdhari and came to know about Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati and Arya Samaj. He founded Arya Samaj at Peshawar (now in Pakisthan) and became a preacher of Punjab Arya Pratinidhi Sabha. He also vowed to write the authentilc life history of Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati. For this purpose, he travelled far and wide and collected a detailed account of the life of the founder of Arya Samaj. Pt. Lekh Ram wrote thirty three books. All his writings are in Urdu, but they have been translated in Hindi and some books have been translated into Sindhi and English also.

Continue reading “Lekh Ram vs. the Ahmadiyya Movement” →

Intro
We have covered MGA and all of his utterances in terms of Dajjal and posted them herein, it doesn’t seem like MGA ever commented on the first 10 verses of Al-Kahf. However, he did comment on the last 10 and the last 20. In 1879, in the BA2, MGA quoted 18:109 (18:110, in the Ahmadi quran) and thus using this verse for his own prophethood. MGA didn’t mention any hadith at this point, nor did he connect the last 10 verses with protection against the Dajjal. In BA-3 (See page 108), MGA quoted one of the first 10 verses of Al-Kahf, however, he didn’t connect it with the Dajjal, Christian missionaries and etc. In BA-4 (see pages 316, 327 and 439), MGA quotes one of the last 10 verses of Al-Kahf, however, he didn’t connect it with the Dajjal, Christian missionaries and etc. By 1891–1893, MGA made his wild claims and argued that Dajjal was the Christian missionaries, and the British and Russian governments.

Just before MGA died, via MGA’s book “Chasma-e-Marifat”, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that the blowing of the trumpet in the Quran, is about the coming of the Messiah (18:100). In BA-5, which was published after MGA died, it is written that MGA=Dhul Qarnain, this falls into the last 20 verses of Sura Al-Kahf. In the 1960’s at Rabwah, the 2nd Khalifa published Malfuzat and it is written therein that MGA did believe that the first 10 verses related to the Anti-Christ (aka Dajjal) (See Malfuzat-3, online english edition, pages 99-100).

After MGA died, and via Malfuzat(see pages 99-100), MGA made the connection, however, this was in the 1960’s in Rabwah.

Thus, in 1917, the Lahori-Ahmadi, Muhammad Ali published his famous english commentary and called the authentic hadith of Muhammad (Saw) in terms of Al-Kahf and Dajjal as true, however, he said, “the first 10 or the last 10”.

In 1988, via the famous 5-volume commentary of the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid, the Ahmadiyya Movement called the famous authentic hadith which was related by Abu Hurraira and in terms of Dajjal and how Muhammad (Saw) specifically told Muslims to recite the first 10 verses of Sura-Al-Kahf (Chapter 18) to get protection from Dajjal as fake hadith. However, he acknowledged the last 10 (most likely since MGA quoted it).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Surah Al-Kahf, protection against Dajjal and the Ahmadiyya Movement” →

Intro
There is a famous hadith which is often repeated which clearly tells us that when Eisa (As) returns to Earth, he will wrapped in 2 yellow garments. When MGA made his wild claims in 1891, he said that this was metaphoric and only meant that the Messiah would not be in good health (see Izala Auham). In 1903, MGA was calling his two ailments as diarrhea and hysteria (See Tadhkiratul Shahadatain). However, by 1906-07, MGA was calling his 2 ailments as excessive urination and hysteria (See Haqiqatul Wahy, pages 387-388, online english edition). MGA even argued that a sign of the Messiah would be that he would coming out of the washroom (Hammam), which is a total lie. This was in terms of the part of the famous hadith that said it would like drops were falling from his head. However, the hadith never says anything about the washroom. Finally, it should be noted that Abu Hurrairah related this hadith, MGA considered him as stupid (astagafarullah).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the 2 yellow sheets that Eisa (As) is supposed to be wrapped in” →