ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
In a recent live stream, Bro Imtiaz quoted the Urdu-edition of the ROR of 1902 (Urdu-ROR of March-1902, page 116), which can also be found in the English version of the ROR (English-ROR, March-1902, page 119-120). These quotes come from an article entitled, “Unity vs. Trinity”, the name of the author is not given (Razi admitted it belongs to MGA), Maulvi Muhammad Ali was the editor (in 1914, Maulvi Muhammad Ali became the leader of the Lahori-Ahmadi’s). “Unity vs. Trinity” has 2 parts, part-1 was published in the English ROR of Feb-1902, and part-2 in March-1902, part-3 came in April-1902. In part-3, MGA famously cited phantom Jewish sources and alleged that Eisa (as) had fell in love with some woman (astagfarullah) and how Mary’s (as) marriage was considered illegitimate by the Jewish clergy.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad actually believed that Eisa (as) was a drunkard and hung out with prostitutes (astagfarullah)(See the Urdu-ROR of March-1902, page 116). MGA said, “In my opinion (Marray Nasdeeq), the Messiah wasn’t one to abstain from alcohol”. This line was purposely mistranslated by Maulvi Muhammad Ali. In this same era (1902), MGA was disrespecting Eisa (as) and saying that Yahya (as) was better than him based on the Quran (astagfarullah)(See also “Dafi-ul-Bala”, page-3, online english edition)(Check out MGA’s writings on Yahya [as]). Bro Imtiaz talks about Yahya (as) as Khusoorun (6:11:45 time stamp)(3:39, 3:40 in the Qadiani Quran) as he authenticated the biblical narrative that Eisa (as) drank alcohol/wine (astagfarullah). MGA was disrespecting Eisa (as) and saying that Yahya (as) was better than him based on the Quran (astagfarullah)(See also “Dafi-ul-Bala”, page-3, online english edition)(Check out MGA’s writings on Yahya [as]).

In the same ROR, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Jesus’ example of morals was quite worthless and misleading. You can listen to Sunni Imam’s Usman Iqbal and Abdul Haleem for their explanation here.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad actually believed that Eisa (as) was a drunkard and hung out with prostitutes (astagfarullah)” →

Intro
As early as 1882-1884, MGA was denying the miracles of Eisa (as). In 1890-1891, MGA argued that the prophets of Allah didn’t have any miracles. Their miracles were actually the prophets practicing magic. Ghulaam falsely claimed himself to be a prophet and therefore this is his implicit admission that he too used to practise magic like he falsely claimed of the rest of the prophets. Ghulaam was projecting. Furthermore, Allaah denies this slander explicitly in the Qur-aan as this was the slander against the prophets like Eesaa AS and Sulaymaan AS that the Jews used to smear. And Moosaa AS was accused by Fir’awn of being a magician, in his own projection. And in general, Satanist sorcery is considered apostasy in both Islaam & Judaism. One of the punishments in early Judaism for this is death penalty by crucifixion. Magic is what they accused Eesaa AS of, among other things.

If someone wants to argue that Ghulaam was only saying that because he had no miracles of his own (and there is a degree of truth to that) then I respond by saying that though they may not be understood as miracles, he claimed things for himself that were still miraculous in their nature. Such as receiving revelation from God (see more below).

Continue reading “The proofs that Ghulam Qadiyani was a sorcerer who practiced satanic witchcraft–By Abu Usaamah An-Nimri (Raaqi)” →

Intro
You can find the full urdu document herein.

Premium ad with prize money for the entire world of Qadianism on their favorite subject

Friends! Mirza Ghulam Qadiani (1839 – 1908 (about 52 years of his age till 1891)) was not only holding the mainstream muslim belief but also his first book
In Brahin Ahmadiyya, he also proved that the real Hazrat Isa (peace be upon him) is coming again from the Qur’anic verses (Mirza himself admitted this on Ijaz Ahmadi, page 19 p. 113.. But at the end of his life, Mirza Qadiani, who presented a very unique and new belief And the theory is summarized as follows:

1 Hazrat Isa, the son of Maryam (peace be upon him), was 33 years and 6 months old when his enemies caught him and put him on the cross along with two thieves on Friday evening. Your body was nailed and injured and you fainted due to pain of injuries and the enemy thought you were dead, when in fact you were still alive.

Rk 17, page 311 / rk 3, page 296 / RK 15, page 20 / rk18, page 396, margin / Rk 15, page 52, etc.)

2) Mirza wrote with reference to Allah, the Almighty, that Allah has stated that although it true That Isa as was dragged/put on cross and it was intended to kill him. Also Mirza wrote that “It is proven from the hadith that after getting rid of the cross, Jesus fled to a cold country, namely Kashmir.

(RK 15 p. 51, Christ in India Ar 15 p. 540, tohfa gaznaviah)

2) You were somehow taken down from the cross, the disciples treated your wounds with Jesus ointment, and then you and your mother left the country of Syria and They reached Kashmir through different regions of afghanistan, India, Nepal, Tibet, etc., and also debated to the people of the Buddhist religion.

Rk 10 Pg 301 rk 14 Pg 191 M Pg 209 212 / Rk15 Pg 70 / Rk19 Pg 65 footnote / Rk 19 Pg 127 rk 21 Pg 262 footnote)

3) Isa as died in Kashmir at the age of 120 years according to one text of Mirza Qadiani and 125 years according to another text written in the same book.

120 years old: RK15 p. 14 ….. 125 years old: Rk 15 p. 55)

4) He is buried in Mahalla Khan Yar of Srinagar city of Kashmir and the grave that is known as “Yuz Asaf” in fact is the grave of Hazrat Isa (peace be upon him).

Rk 14, p. 171 and p. 192, D. 195 and p. 209/ Rk 17, page 100/ Rk 18, page 235/ Rk 15, page 14)

5) the hadiths in which the Nuzool of “Jesus, the son of Mary, peace be upon him” is reported, they do not refer to the real Jesus, but rather to someone in likeness of him, as per the Qur’an and ahadeeth e sahiha have given good news that the likeness of Christ and others in likeness will also come.

(Malfuzaat volume 5 page 554 five volume edition / RK 19 page 18 margin / RK 3 page 314)

6) that (matheel) likness is me Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani bin Chirag Bibi and this is reported in the hadiths, and the Qur’an has named me Ibn Maryam, “I have come in the guise of Christ son of Maryam according to the promise, I am the one.” The promised Messiah, and my God has informed me that the Muhammadan Messiah (i.e. Mirza) is better than the Musawi messiah.

RK 17 p. 413 / Rk20 p. 39-140 / rk18 p. 240 / Rk 17 p. 413 / Rk 19 p. 98 / tadhkirah, p. 209, 148, fourth edition)

7)In the hadiths, it is mentioned that the Dajjal will be killed by the hands of Jesus. This Dajjal means either Christian priests, or Dajjal is the name of Satan, or Dajjal
is the name of a group of miscreants, or Dajjal is the ghost of Christianity, or Dajjal refers to Khanaas(dont know how to translate it),
or Dajjal refers to the nations of Iqbal(don’t know how to translate it)

Rk 3 p. 366 1 rk14 p. 416 417 / Rk 22 p. 45 rk 3 p. 174 / rk3 p. 362 / rk 14 p. 296 / Rk 11 p. 47 etc.)

Hazrat Masih (peace be upon him) had four real brothers and two real sisters.

Rk 19 pg18 footnote
وفات_مسیح_(مکمل_قادیانی_عقائد)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Intro
“Khudai Faisla” seems to be a small booklet (9-10 pages)(Urdu) that was written by MGA and his team and seems to have been inserted into “Anjam-e-Athim” in 1984 as part of the Ruhani Khuzain editing project by Mirza Tahir Ahmad in 1984 and from the UK.

In this small booklet, MGA drew a Cartoon of the Trinity. MGA invites one of the following Christian priests: Dr. Martin Clark, Imad-ud-Din, Thakur Das, Hasam-ud-Din, Safdar Ali Bhandara, Thomas Howell, or Fateh Maseeh. MGA says Christians eat pigeons with relish although the pigeon is their God (Holy Spirit). Hindus are better as they do not eat their God, the bull. MGA offered to gather in a field (Mubahila) and let the wrath of God descend on the person opposite. Offers 10,000 rupees (3,000 advance) in case nothing happens to the opposite person within one year. MGA challenged a Mubahila to Muslim scholars, he declares Nazir Hussain of Delhi to be the originator of the declaration of ‘kufr’ against MGA.

Continue reading “What is “Khudai Faisla”? A small book by MGA?” →

Intro
In Sahih hadith, it is explained how Surah Fatiha came down only to Muhammad (Saw).

In “Ijaz ul Masih” (arabic book)(1901), this is an Arabic-only book by MGA and his team of writers which was prompted via MGA’s challenge to Pir Mehar ‘Ali Shah, it was published on February 23, 1901 (see Hidden Treasures). In his challenge issued on July 20, 1900, MGA wanted to put at rest various insinuations against him about his lack of knowledge of the Arabic language. The Muslims of the Punjab knew about MGA, they knew that MGA was using ghost writers and he could barely even speak in Arabic.

MGA quotes the NT and claims it’s a prophecy made by an ancient prophet regarding Surah Fatiha, this research is incomplete until we find the original quote from the book of MGA, that is unknown. Nevertheless, in Zafurullah Khan‘s translation of MGA’S Tafsir of Surah Fatiha. The verses quoted by MGA are from Revelations chapter 10:14. The issue is the book of revelations is believed to be written by an early Christian writer. But MGA seems to think this writer is an ancient prophet who was shown fatiha. MGA further confuses the bible with the Qur’an (Urdu scan).

Here when he quoted that passage from the NT he claimed Mufassireen of the Qur’an had an ijma(consensus) claiming that same passage was in reference to MGA’S time aka the time of the promised Messiah however MGA doesn’t name a single classical Mufassir who has said this.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claims that the Surah Fatiha (Chapter 1 of the Quran) in the New Testament?” →

Intro
Zahir Ahmad is great grand son of MGA (maternal). His biological mother was Sahibzadi Amtul Jameel (aka Bibi Jameel) was a daughter of Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad through his 3rd wife, Syeda Maryam. His father was the son of a famous Qadiani-Ahmadi missionary Maulvi Chaudhry Fateh Muhammad Sial, Chaudhri Nasir Ahmad Sial. Chaudhri Nasir Ahmad Sial and Sahibzadi Amtul Jameel (aka Bibi Jameel) had one son which was forcibly given away to be raised in his uncles house (MM Ahmad and his mom’s sister, Amtul Qayyum), since they didn’t have any kids. Chaudhri Nasir Ahmad Sial and Sahibzadi Amtul Jameel (aka Bibi Jameel) had 3 daughters also. Oral history has told us that Chaudhri Nasir Ahmad Sial didn’t live with his wife often, she stayed in Rabwah at her fathers palace (Qasr-e-Khilafat) and Chaudhri Nasir Ahmad Sial worked odd jobs and was barely home. We think Zahir Ahmad was born in the 1960’s in Pakistan and he moved to the USA with his adopted parents soon thereafter. Zahir Ahmad inherited a special ring in the Mirza family. When MGA died, he had 3 rings that were given to his 3 sons (from his second marriage), Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad, Mirza Bashir Ahmad and Mirza Sharif Ahmad. The ring that was given to Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad is now used at the official ring for the Khalifa, and whomever the Khalifa is, the ring must be worn. The ring that was given to Mirza Sharif Ahmad was given to Mirza Masroor Ahmad (the 5th Khalifa), even before his election, Mirza Sharif Ahmad had given it to Mirza Mansoor Ahmad (father of Mirza Masroor Ahmad, the 5th Khalifa). The last ring was given to Mirza Bashir Ahmad, who gave it to MM Ahmad, who gave it to Zahir Ahmad (a quote from Seeratul Mahdi about the rings is posted in the below).

In 2008, he wrote a long life story of his adopted father, MM Ahmad (it is posted in the below). Per his linkedin account, he is the CEO of a company called “Office Suites”, and since 1993. He was the Operations Manager at the Mashaal Corporation from 1985 to 1993. He was also the Director of Business Development at Softtech Systems Inc.

By the 2000’s, he found a wife, Tazeen Ahmad, they had 2 kids, Muhammad (born in 1987)(aka Moe Vision, a rapper) and a daughter named Marium. In 2008, he wrote a memorial about his adopted father, the famous MM Ahmad.

Continue reading “Who is Zahir Ahmad? The adopted son of MM Ahmad and his biological nephew” →

Intro
Via Seeratul Mahdi (1923) and other early books on the life of MGA, it becomes clear that the 2nd Khalifa (and his team of writers) fabricated most of the #AnonymousHindu miracles related to MGA, on top of that, there were no additional witnesses. MGA alleged that there were Arya Samaj Hindu’s from Qadian who have witnessed his signs, he gives the name of Lalah Sharampat and his friend Lala Malawamal. MGA also claims to have told Sharampat before hand about Duleep Singh. Lala Malawamal was a close friend of Lala Sharampat, they were both from Qadian, these are the 2 Hindu’s that MGA mentions in Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya 1-4, the 3rd is Bishandas Brahman (See Haqiqatul Wahy). MGA also claims that Lalah Sharampat and Lala Malawamal were the witnesses in this famous revelation, that became a ring that All Ahmadi’s wear, “Is Allah not sufficient for his servant”. MGA also claims that he prophecied the death of his father (Mirza Ghulam Murtaza) and these 2 were the witnesses. (See “Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm”, in english it would be “The Aryas of Qadian”). MGA also alleges that he prophecied the assassination of Dayanand, and Lalah Sharampat was the witness.

It is evident that Qadianis do not truly believe in the prophet Muhammad SAW as they believe in their Qadiani Babas (MGA and his papacy) because they try their best to deny the miracles of all the prophets, especially the prophet Muhammad SAW. They try to disprove his miracles and argue that those Ahadith are fabricated and make up silly arguments for denying the prophetic miracles in the Quran.

We want to be fair so we are objectively observing the Qadiani Ahadith. Upon careful observation, it is evident that the majority of miracles witnessed by the #AnonymousHindu are narrated by K2. He does not even say that he heard from someone or witnessed himself. He just narrates miraculous stories witnessed by the #AnonymousHindu who most likely does not exist and there is no way for anyone to verify the stories. However, Qadianis are forced to believe in them because of their faith in K2.

Among the most famous miracles of MGA is the miracle of MGA’s tiger which attacked the #AnonymousHindu that was trying to hypnotize MGA and then became a believer of MGA but never to be found like K4’s African Kings, ironically. Not surprisingly, the very story was narrated by K2 in Seerat al Mahdi and he gave no chain of narrators or eye witnesses, which Qadianis need to treat as either a weak or fabricated Hadith. However, we find the likes of Ahmadi Answers still love to propagate these as signs.

Continue reading “The #AnonymousHindu in Seerat ul Mahdi (1923 edition)” →

Intro
There are countless sahih hadith on the return of Eisa (As) at the eastern minaret at Damascus (The Ummayad mosque)(too many to list).

It should be noted how Mirza Ghulam Ahmad prefaced all of his claims in the first 4 volumes of Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya. In BA-4 (See pages 373-374) MGA alleges to have received a revelation about revelations being sent down at Qadian, MGA did not give an explanation (he was called a Kafir). However, in roughly 1890 (published in 1918), and via a private letter from Maulvi Noorudin, MGA was convinced by Noorudin to forget about the hadith about Damascus and simply claim to be the Maseel-e-Maseeh (like of the Messiah)(See Maktubat-e-Ahmadiyyah Volume 5: Part II). Which MGA promptly did. In the same era (1890-1891), MGA wrote Izala Auham wherein he argued that his revelations in BA-4 about Qadian, actually meant Damascus, and in a weird way, Damascus=Qadian. MGA also addressed the other famous part of this hadith, the 2 yellow garments, when MGA made his wild claims in 1891, he said that this was metaphoric and only meant that the Messiah would not be in good health (see Izala Auham in the below).

By 1893-1894 (via Hamamatul Bushra), MGA was claiming that the word minaret=1400 years, in some weird concept of numerology, we were not able to figure out the math. It should be, Minaret=13x9x14x1x18x5x20 (see the ref in the below). However, this set of numbers doesn’t equal 1400.

By 1902, MGA and his team decided to build the minaret in Masjid Aqsa at Qadian, however, after lots of funds were collected, and they even made a list of the donor’s (See Dard), the minaret was not built, only the bottom part. MGA allegedly laid the foundation stone of the Minaratul Masih on March 13th, 1903. The 2nd Khalifa completed the building of the minaret in 1916-1917. The ROR of Aug-1932 has an extensive essay on the “Minarat ul Maseeh”. In 1939, the Mirza was accepting 100 rupees for Ahmadi’s to get their named written on it.

In 1924, the second Khalifa visited Damascusm Ahmadi mullah asserted that this completed a prophecy of MGA that he would visit the arab lands (See Tadhkirah).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the hadith about the Messiah descending at the eastern minaret of Damascus” →

Intro
Lekh Ram was born in 1858 in Jhelum, Punjab, British India. He was a police officer in Punjab and resigned from the government service voluntarily and devoted for propagation of Vedas even not caring for his family and only son too. He was influenced by the writings of Munshi Kanhaiya Lal Alakhdhari and came to know about Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati and Arya Samaj. He founded Arya Samaj at Peshawar (now in Pakistan) and became a preacher of Punjab Arya Pratinidhi Sabha. He also vowed to write the authentic life history of Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati. For this purpose, he travelled far and wide and collected a detailed account of the life of the founder of Arya Samaj. Pt. Lekh Ram wrote thirty three books. All his writings are in Urdu, but they have been translated in Hindi and some books have been translated into Sindhi and English also.

Continue reading “Lekh Ram vs. the Ahmadiyya Movement” →