Intro
Khurram Shah embarrassed himself again and did a video on all humans becoming Ibn Maryam. Most of this video is Khurram showing his hate towards Adnan Rashid and all other Muslims. However, Khurram can’t spell in English very good, since he mis-spelled pregnancy as “preganacy”. It should be noted that Khurram admitted to not be willing to engage with any Muslim. Even if Khurram does engage, he is too competitive, he has too much pride and ego.

At 55:52, Khurram alleges that MGA said to read “Tauhde-Maram” and see MGA’s views. However, in this book, MGA claimed to be a non-prophet and alleged that even Muhammad (Saw) didn’t make prophethood a prerequisite for the Messiah (see pages 16-18).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

2:19, Khurram argues that All humans on Earth can become Ibn Maryam (as)? Even the drunks? He then says that Muhammad (Saw) only promised one.

4:00, Khurram admits that the substitution theory is in Tabari. 12 versions?

6:30, Khurram alleges that Adnan called the Quran vague on the story of Eisa (as) and the crucifixtion. Khurram says that the entire Quran is “Quttay Dalala”. Khurram says that the righteous understand it perfectly. But even Tabari called it “ikhtalaf”.

10:00, Khurram admits that there is “mutashabihat” (unclear verses).

11:00, crazy stories in the Tafsir (substitution theory). But MGA called Tabari the chief of the interpretters of the Quran.

12:35, he calls Adnan a munafiq.

14:00, Khurram alleges that he doesn’t even want to talk to Adnan Rashid. Adnan can go and talk to AFCB.

44:07, Khurram says that Allah blew into him, not her. What is Khurram inferring?

46:35, spiritually, countless people can become Eisa (as) bin Maryam.

49:06, Khurram asks, was Maryam (as) a him? Khurram quoted 66:12 and inferred exactly that! And via the official 5-volume short commentary of the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid (first published in 1988 and then again). However, Khurram doesn’t know that in the 5 volume LONG commentary by the same author, he translates it as “we breathed therein”, instead “we breathed in him”, which is an obvious error. Furthermore, why hasn’t Khurram checked Tafseer-e-Kabeer or Tafseer-e-Sagheer for confirmation of ideology?

51:46, Khurram proves that he can’t spell very good. He spelled pregnancy and “preganacy”. Khurram quoted

55:52, Khurram alleges that MGA said to read “Tauhde-Maram” and see MGA’s views. However, in this book, MGA claimed to be a non-prophet and alleged that even Muhammad (Saw) didn’t make prophethood a prerequisite for the Messiah (see pages 16-18).

1:18:30, Maryam was also Raffa.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad