May 2017

Money grabbing, and the end of Ahmadiyyat

This entire entry was taken from here:

Assalam o alikum

Ramadan Mubarak to both Muslims and Ahmadis

I hope and pray that we use this blessed month to purify our hearts, and gain nearness to Allah (swt)

Since I’m already dizzy fasting, I thought I could dish out a blog during the first day of Ramadan. This issue has been bothering me for months, and so I’d like to offload it here.

In this blog, I will discuss the amount of money the jamat harbours. With that in mind, it will show the numbers of Ahmadis worldwide, it will also bring light onto more lies regarding money spending, and finally, I’d like to discuss the future of Ahmadiyyat in terms of its financial predicament.

The three most essential branches by which the Ahmadiyya Jamat receives their income is based on Chanda Aam, Waqfe Jadid, and tahriki jadid. There’s a dozen more less significant ones like payments for Jalsa, ijtemas, MTA, and others.

Chanda Aam

This is 6% of the net income of every wage earner. This doesn’t take into account that here in the UK, around two-thirds of a person’s income goes on rent, nor does it take into account other essential taxes taken by the Government. Not only that, the 6% is taken from your state benefits like child tax, child benefits, and unemployment benefits. Any income from property, land, and investment are also taken into consideration. Basically, everything, and anything, save gifts, and even those, they look at you with disgust.

This amount is compulsory, and if you don’t pay it, well, be sure to get some freaky looking blokes knocking at your house every two weeks.

I’m not sure how much money they get from this yearly, but when you have doctors and engineers who give 6% of their income, then, you’ll probably get millions yearly, but I don’t think it will exceed £10 million worldwide since most Ahmadis in the west are broke taxi drivers.

The two below are voluntary, but they pester you into thinking they’re compulsory


2012- 5,018,000

Ranking of top contributors: Pakistan, USA (difference between UK £11,00) UK…… [1]

2013- £5,484,000

Ranking: *UK, Pakistan, USA, Germany, Canada, India, Australia, Indonesia, middle eastern country, Belgium

Apparently, the money was spent on: “most of this work has happened in African and India. From among these 158 mosques that I mentioned [136 plus the 22], 102 are full fledged mosques built in Africa and 22 perhaps in India, sheds so that they can be used right away to fulfil the immediate needs.” [2]

In the US, it was advised that “Please urge all children (under the age of 15) to become Nanha Mujahid by sacrificing $50 or more of their own money towards the Blessed Waqf-e-Jadid Scheme.” 

This money would be earned, and it may be received even from parents, but for performing certain tasks around the house.

Our ultimate goal is to have the US Ahmadi children contribute half of all Waqf-e-Jadid collection, insha-Allah. [3]

2014- £6,209,155

2015- £6,891,155

Ranking: Pakistan, UK, USA, Germany, Canada, India, Australia, Indonesia, a Middle Eastern country, Belgium and Ghana. [4]

2016- £8,020,000

Ranking: Pakistan, UK, Germany, US, Canada, India, Australia, a country from middle-east, Indonesia, a country from middle east and Ghana, and then are Belgium and Switzerland. [6]

Tehriki Jadid

2007/8- £4 million

2012/13- £8 million

2014/15- £9 million

2015/16- £11 million


Ranking generally: Pakistan, Germany, UK, USA, Canada, India, Australia, Indonesia, two Middle Eastern countries, Switzerland, Ghana and Nigeria.


I’m not sure why there are two different schemes for propagating ‘True Islam’, but both are practically for the same thing. Building mosques, school, and missionary centres.

The clearest annual report was given in 2013, in which they said they spent £19.9 million of the £20.3 million. They also said Ahmadiyyat had already built over 15,000 mosques, over 656 schools, and over 30 hospitals.

What to take from this quick search

  1. Most of these voluntary donations are given by children (up to 15 years of age). If the numbers are accurate, children in the US are paying between £200,000-£400,000 yearly, only for Waqfe-jadid.
  2. Ahmadis are stripped to their core when it comes to donating. If you add the donation of the children, as well as the Chanda Aam, you’re looking at 15%-20% of the income gone in donation.
  3. They’re still lying about the donation numbers. I think these numbers are an exaggeration, and I don’t think Ahmadis in Pakistan are giving that much money yearly. Plus, 15,000 mosques built, really? In the UK, they have less than 50, and the rest of the world has 15,000? Yeah, jog on.
  4. If the numbers are true, then most of the donations come from Pakistan and European countries. If you put both waqfe, and tehriki together, it means UK is giving around £2-3 million in voluntary donations yearly, as of 2016.
  5. Other than European countries and Pakistan, Ahmadis are nowhere to be seen (a true testament of their real numbers). Ghana, harbouring over 100,000 Ahmadis (Seen by their enormous Jalsa turnout) gives out less than £5,000 in donations yearly. Which brings me to the conclusion that Ahmadis in Africa are in on it for the $$$. The same goes for Indonesia, and Bangladesh isn’t even on there. The middle eastern countries listed are rich Arab states like Saudi Arabia, Dubai, or UAE; Pakistanis Ahmadis work there and donate from there.

What they really spend it on

MTA: They have three separate satellites running. MTA1, 2, and 3. To run those 3 yearly, it costs them around £5-8 million

Jalsa salana, local, regional, and national ijtemas worldwide: £2 million

Maintaining mosques, and building them: Let’s give them a generous £2 million

Maintaining 5 Jamia Ahmadiyya (I’m embarrassed to call them universities) worldwide: feeding the students, pocket money, and trips… approx £2 million

Paying for Murabbis and full-time workers: Your talking about paying for the families of 200 Ahmadi missionaries worldwide. Around £5 million

Total: £15-20 million


What will eventually break them

Most of their donations come from European countries. Their survival will rely on how rich Ahmadis are in the west, and I don’t think that will be the case anymore. No Ahmadi in their right mind would want to pay 6% of their net income. That’s just not happening here in the UK. I think all the numbers above are fake in some way, exaggerated, but nonetheless, it’s a close estimate.

What will eventually bring them to their knees are the jamia graduates. In the UK alone, you have 10-18 students graduating from Jamia annually, and that’s the case in Canada and Germany. In 8 years time, they’ll have around 350 missionaries to feed, along with their families. That’s another added £10 million on top of all the others I just discussed above.

The future of donations in Europe is in a state of decline, nothing has really happened between 2012 and 2017 for there to be a drastic increase in donations, except if Masroor Ahmad had really stressed on giving donations, which could be a sign of desperation.

In any case, this wave of new missionaries, with unaccredited worthless degrees will be a great burden on Ahmadiyyat in the foreseeable future.

Like I’ve always said, time is the best testament of truth. Only time will show falsehood. All I have to do is wait patiently.


And I know I said I won’t be posting again, but this topic really boggled me for a long time.

And peace be unto you

And by the way, nobody should take this as gospel, I might be wrong in some of my estimations, and I look forward to what some of you might say on where the real spending is put.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad says that any Muslim who believes in abrogation, is a Kafir

Izala Auham is an interesting book. Ahmadiyya leadership seems to be purposely lying about its publish date. As we all know, this book came in 2 parts, the first part was published in 1890, before MGA claimed to be Esa (as), and before MGA claimed that Esa (as) was dead. In fact, Part-1 has some very controversial writings which prove that MGA was a liar and planned all of his claims. In this particular quote, MGA is claiming that ALL muslims who believe that “abrogation” occurred in Islam are Kafirs. However, as we all know, in 1891, 99% of the Muslim world believed in the theory of abrogation. In fact, Sir Syed had denied it in 1880, Noorudin and MGA copied him directly. It must be noted that the “Quran-only-type-of-Muslims” have existed since the inception of Islam. However, even those Muslims never declared anyone a Kafir for believing in hadith. And further, the quran specifically tells Muslims to follow both, the quran and hadith.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad says that any Muslim who believes in abrogation, is a Kafir”

Ahmadiyya leadership never gave a “cause-of-death” for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

There are many debates all over the internet in terms of the death of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. However, after double checking many sources, its obvious that the earliest Ahmadiyya newspapers and books totally avoided the “cause of death” for MGA.  It should be noted that MGA’s enemies/critics, i.e. Sanaullah and Dr. Khan’s comments on the “cause of death” for MGA are all missing.  However, in 1915, Farquhar wrote that MGA died of cholera, however, he gives no source at all. It wasnt til 1927, and the autobiography of his life wherein he mentioned that MGA seemed to have died of cholera.  

The Vakil

The Al-Hakam

“As his condition became precarious, we stayed by him and continued treatment, but his pulse stopped by 10:15 A.M., on the 26th May, 1908 he breathed his last.”
(Al-Hakam, May 28, 1908)

Other ahmadiyya newspapers
The english version of the Review of Religions didn’t give a “cause of death”, however, the Al-Badr, Urdu-Review of Religions, Tashishazul-Adhan and other newspapers are unchecked.

Muhammad Ali in 1917
Muhammad Ali writes as follows: 
“he suddenly fell ill at about 10 o’clock on the evening of the 25th May and expired at about the same hour on the morning of the 26th, in the house of Dr. Syed Muhammad Hussain Shah, in the Ahmadiyya buildings.  The body was carried back, the same evening, to Qadian where he was buried on the 27th of May…” (see page 52).  

Mahmud Ahmad in 1915
Mahmud Ahmad wrote about the death of MGA in 1915, however, that edition of the book is missing, it was most likely edited.  This is the 1998 edition and it seems that this was book was missing from the records for 60 years, since it was published in 1967.

Just like everything in Ahmadiyya…Ahmadiyya leadership has lied about the reason of MGA’s death.


The history of Ahmadiyya in the Gambia

By 2020, we estimate that there are roughly 2000 Qadiani-Ahmadi’s in the entire country. Baba F. Trawally is the Amir of the Ahmadiyya community. There are 4 Ahmadiyya mosques in the entire country, 3 of them the capacity is barely 100, the last one, Ahmadiyya sources claim that the capacity is 5000, however, that is including the outside space. The amount of Ahmadi mullahs is unknown. The Ahmadiyya mosque in Saba seems to be the first ever Ahmadi mosque in the country.

Ahmadiyya buildings in the Gambia

–Ahmadiyya Mosque in Saba[70]

–Ahmadiyya Mosque in Burock, a small village located in Foli Kansala which is one of the nine districts in the Western Division of The Gambia.[70]

–Ahmadiyya Mosque in Latrikunda, a locale within Serrekunda, largest city in The Gambia.[71]

–Baitus Salam Mosque in Talinding Kunjang. In 1988, Mirza Tahir Ahmad laid the foundation stone. 


In 1952, the Ahmadiyya Jamaat spread to the Gambia (see Fisher) via publications, however, there was no Qadiani-Ahmadi missionary. The first missionary to enter the country was Alhaji Hamza Sanyaolo, a Nigerian who entered in 1959(see Fisher). After a number of months he was followed by Gibriel Saeed, a Ghanaian missionary(see Fisher). Since its earliest history in the Gambia, the the islamic community has rejected Ahmadi’s (see Fisher). By 1966, the first Ahmadi head of state anywhere in the world became Farimang Mamadi Singhateh, who seems to have been a puppet dictator set up by the British, he was forced to go to Rabwah and give bait to the Khalifa first. He was technically the second Ahmadi head of state, since Ghulam Nabi Gilkar and Azad Kashmir were the first in 1948. He most likely had never read critically about Ahmadiyya or Islam. Similarly, in Pakistan, the USA and British government allowed Zia ul Haq to come to power in 1977 and he had deep connections with Ahmadiyya. In the 1970’s, the famous Dr. Balogan became an ex-ahmadi and wrote about the fraud of Ahmadiya. Even western academic researchers like Trimingham (1968) called Ahmadiyya a maritime implantation by the British.


The Muslim Congress of Gambia generally considered itself to be responsible for the advancement of Islamic education among the country’s populations. In view of the supremacy of the Christian missionary activity in the colony, a small group of people from Bathurst, now Banjul, began to feel that the Congress was lacking diligence in its efforts (see Fisher 1963) As a consequence, by 1952 the group formed Jama’at ul-Muiminin (Community of Believers). Within a period of a few years, a large number of its members became Ahmadi Muslims as a tribute to traders and the flow of Ahmadiyya literature into the colony. The group established an Arabic school and desired that a Pakistani Ahmadi teacher, Mubarak Ahmad Saqi, then a missionary in Sierra Leone, be employed. Despite a formal request in February 1953, the colony’s Executive Council did not give permission for a Pakistani to enter. As a result, the group employed a Senegalese member of the Tijaniyyah Sufi tariqa under a provisional basis. Due to financial constraints, however, the school closed down within a year (see Fisher 1963).


Nur Muhammad Nasim Saifi attempted to revive Saqi’s case. The Fazl Mosque in London requested Hugh Linstead, a British Member of Parliament to write to the authorities to overturn the decision made in the colony. An alternative candidate, Muhammad Ishaq Sufi, a pioneering missionary stationed in Liberia was also offered on whose behalf it is stated that a petition with 250 signatures from Ahmadi Muslims of Banjul was prepared. After holding two sessions in consultation with the Muslim members of the colony’s Legislative Council, the government once again blocked the Ahmadi Muslim missionary of Pakistani heritage. As a consequence, Saifi consulted another British politician Fenner Brockway and made another failed attempt in 1958. Finally, a Nigerian Ahmadi missionary was prepared for the Gambia (see Fisher 1963).


Al-haji Hamza Sanyaolo, a Nigerian missionary arrived in Gambia and served for a period of a few months before a Ghanaian missionary, Gibriel Saeed replaced him.


On March 10, 1961, the first Pakistani missionary, Chaudhry Muhammad Sharif, was permitted to enter the colony. Sharif served in Bathurst until January 23, 1963. It was during Sharif’s period in the Gambia, through another Ahmadi missionary, Alhaji Ibrahim Jikineh, that Muhammad Farimang Singhateh accepted Islam Ahmadiyya, who was to later become the Governor General of the Gambia. Singhateh was also the national president of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community of the Gambia (See Arnold Hughes, David Perfect. Historical Dictionary of the Gambia. Scarecrow Press. p. 214).


Ahmadiyya entered Gambia during the era of the Second Caliphate through the flow of Ahmadiyya literature and a number of traders returning to the country, perhaps from Nigeria (see Fisher 1963, p. 126). It was in the early 1960s that the first group of Ahmadi Muslim Gambians were sent to be trained as missionaries in order to serve in the Gambia. The first Ahmadi mosque in the country was built in 1963 and another one four years after its independence, in Farafenni, in 1969.[7]


In February of 1965 when The Gambia celebrated her independence, it was Ghulam Ahmad Badomali, the amir and missionary-in-charge of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community who led the prayers on behalf of the Muslim ummah.


On July 5, 1966, Sighateh became the governor,[5] he was the first Ahmadi Muslim head of any state or colony in the history of the Ahmadiyya movement.[3] Following his appointment, he wrote a letter to the Caliph III requesting a piece of cloth of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement. For Ahmadi Muslims this was the first time in the history of the Community that the prophecy of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, “I shall bless you so much so that kings shall seek blessings from thy garments“, was literally fulfilled.[6]


The first Ahmadi Muslim caliph to visit the Gambia was Caliph III, Mirza Nasir Ahmad, whose visit in 1970 was instrumental in the launch of the Nusrat Jahan Scheme which has been responsible for the establishment of a number of schools in the country. On May 1, 1970 the Caliph arrived in Banjul, for a five-day visit, as part of his tour of West Africa. As part of his visit the Gambia, the caliph met Dawda Jawara, the then President of the Gambia, and a number of other public figures.[8]


However, by 1973, the Supreme Islamic was established and headed by Imam Lamin Touray and Imam Fatty in the second Republic. He went further to say that the former president of the first Republic of The Gambia Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara refused to take part in declaring Ahmadi Muslims as kafir during the second OIC Summit/Conference held in Pakistan 🇵🇰 on February 22-24 1974 at the instigation of the then President of Pakistan Ali Bhutto and how Ali Bhutto and the rest of the proponents of that summit ended for opposing this divine Jamaat. He said President Bhutto was overthrown on July 5, 1977 in a military operations code name Operation Fair Play by General Ziaul Haq five years after the said OIC meeting and got hanged at the gallows on April 4, 1979. King Faisal of Saudi Arabia was shot to death in his royal palace by his nephew on March 25, 1975. President Anwar Sadat of Egypt was also gunned down on October 6, 1981 during a military parade by his own military officer, President Edi Amen of Uganda who also took active part during the summit was also overthrown on April 11, 1979. President Qadafi of Libya was brutally murdered on October 20, 2011 and all those who played prominent role in declaring Jamaat Ahmadiyyat outside the pale of Islam suffered similar fate. Sir Dawda Jawara the President of the first Republic of The Gambia who refused to take part in this anti-Ahmadiyya scheme, lived long and died peacefully.

The first ever Jalsa Salana is held.

Singateh refrained from any politics till his untimely death in 1977 and went back to his medical practice which was his first love and spent time with his children travelling to Kolda and Dakar visiting friends and family.[1] A street in the capital, Banjul, was named in his honour.

In 1988, Mirza Tahir Ahmad laid the foundation stone for the Baitus Salam Mosque in Talinding Kunjang.

In the fall of 2014, a leading Gambian Muslim cleric, Alhaji Abdoulie Fatty, who was also the Imam of the State House of the Gambia at that time, called for the expulsion of Ahmadi Muslims from the country. Having described Ahmadi Muslims as non-Muslims, he called for a ban on the propagation of Ahmadiyya teachings in the Gambia.[9][10] Following his comments, Fatty was fired as the Imam of the State House. It has been speculated that the dismissal is attributed to his comments concerning the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, which the Imam denies.[11] In January 2015, the Gambia Supreme Islamic Council aired on state television its decision to declare the Community, as a non-Muslim group.[12] The move was condemned by Baba Trawally, the National President of the Gambian Ahmadiyya movement and Demba Ali Jawo, former president of the Gambia Press Union.[13][14]

Gambian Supreme Islamic Council declares Ahmadiyya/Qadianiyah Movement as out of the fold of Islam

For decades Jamaat Ahmadiyya has been very active in the African Countries, where they have made many converts by pretending to be Sunn Muslims, and at others times pretending to be belonging to the same Ahmadiyya Tariqa which is well-known in the North African countries. This well-known Ahmadiyya Tariqa is a sufi order of the sunni tariqa that goes back to several hundred years, founded by Syed Ahmed Badawi in Egypt. Shrine if Syed Ahmed Badawi is in Tanta in Egypt but his followers are all over Africa. Jamaat Ahmadiyya, taking advantage of the similarity in name and ignorance of Muslims about Mirza Qadiani and his Jamaat, managed to get many converts to their ranks. They have been following the style of Christian Missionaries and using their unlimited resources, they offer financial incentives, they open schools, clinics, community centers etc., and through these gain converts. As many parts of Africa had been under colonial rule of various European Imperialist powers, and Ahmadiyya being their henchmen, they had received a lot of support from the colonial masters, and after their departure, their loyalists who were handed over the charge of the government.

Gambia has been one such country. In 1965, the British Imperialists were forced to grant the country of Gambia its independence. They abdicated rule in favor of one of their faithful supporters, Mr. Farman Sangat, whom they appointed to the position of Governor of that nation. Mr. Sangat was a known Qadiani, who one year earlier had traveled to Rabwah, Pakistan, and given his oath of allegiance (bai’at) to Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmood, the second head of the Qadiani Movement. During British rule, the Qadiani headquarters in Gambia had continually preached that obedience to the British Empire was an article of faith for every Muslim!

AlHamdolilah by the Grace of Allah, reawakening of Islam is taking place all over and the fraud of Ahmadiyyat/Qadianiyat is being exposed for what it is. and The Gambia is not staying behind. The President of the nation of Gambia, Mr. Yahya AbuBakr, has officially declared the country’s Qadiani community a non-Muslim minority, after Qadiani scholars were outclassed by Muslim scholars in the Courts and other fora.

Following is the translation of statement of The Gambia Supreme Islamic Council.

Translated from the original in Arabic

Bismillah Al-Rehman Al-Raheem

Wa’tasimu_ bi hablilla_hi jami’aw wa la_ tafarraqu (3.103)

The Gambia Supreme Islamic Council
Banjul, The Gambia
Date: 21/4/2001

Circular of The Supreme Council about the Islamic Stand
regarding Ahmadiyya/Qadianiyah Movement

Beware of the dangerous claims bragged openly by the Ahmadis Qadianis, which destroy the very foundation of Islamic Beliefs, with their superficial proofs spread through their publications and announcements through broadcasting and television. These Islamic beliefs are the corner stone of the belief of Muslims. For the sake of peaceful co-existence of all the people of The Gambia, for its security and stability, the Gambian Supreme Council has decide to caution the Muslims about the following:

      1. that among the basic beliefs of Muslims, is the belief that Holy Prophet Muhammad SAAW is the Final Prophet and Messenger and that there is no prophet after Him, as per the testimony of the Word of Allah:

“Muhammad is not the father of any of your men but (he is) the Apostle of Allah
and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things.
(Surah Al Ahzab 33.40)

      1. that among the established facts in the Book of Allah (Quran) and Sunnah of Holy Prophet SAAW, is that Eisa alaihe assalam (Jesus) was neither murdered, nor put on the cross, nor died and that he will descend in the last days before the establishment of Qiyamah.

And all those who do not believe in these facts and testimonies, are not Muslims. Therefore The Supreme Islamic Council of The Gambia announce for all Muslims in Gambia that the Ahmadiyya Movement is not among the Muslims, because their beliefs are opposite to the above mentioned beliefs.
This fatwa is not some innovation from the Council, there are fatwas and edicts from different Islamic Countries. Among them are:

      1. Conference of Islamic Organisations which convened in Makkah Mukarramah in the onth of April 1974, which declared that Ahmadiyya Movement is a non-Muslim minority.
      2. Conference of Islamic Research at Al-Azher University, Arab Republic of Egypt in the year 1988, mentioned in its last ciscular that Ahmadiyya Movement is non-Islamic.
      3. In the Constitutional Amendment in Islamic Republic of Pakistan, in the year 1974, it is stated that anyone who is not believing in the absolute finality of prophethood of Holy Prophet Muhammad SAAW or anyone who claim prophethood in any form or believe in the claims of prophethood of such a person, he is not a Muslim for the purpose of constitution and law.
      4. The Decision of the High Court of South Africa, which was published in the newspaper of the Islamic World on Monday 1st April 1996, the court has prohibited the Ahmadis/Qadianis from entering the mosques of Muslims, or to speak on behalf of Islam and to consider them as a false group.

Your brothers in Allah
General Council
The Gambian Supreme Islamic Council


Bismillah Al-Rehman Al-Raheem

The Original Arabic Image of the Statement Issued by
The Gambia Supreme Islamic Council

Back to Gambian Issue
Back to Homepage


As Mandinka Proverb says, “Ni Emaluta Nyaala, Ebuka Kugho Busuno”

With the number of people the United Democratic Party has, including very erudite Imams, Oustasses and other practicing Muslims, the Amir of Ahmadiyah Jama’t is chosen to do the opening prayer on behalf of the 95% Muslims in the Gambia at the party’s Congress 2020.

This is a clear misrepresentation of Muslims, and I personally deem it as an INSULT to the genuine Muslims of this country including the party militants.

Yes, Ahmadiyas are citizens of this country and they enjoy the same rights that all other citizens enjoy. They can be invited and their Amir can represent them in any befitting gatherings, but they CANNOT and SHOULD NOT represent Muslims especially in such a manner at a gathering that is attended by uncountable number of genuine Muslims.

The Amir can do such a prayer on behalf of Ahmadiyahs; in contrast, it’d be a deliberate sabotage to Islam and Muslims.

If the party that can be considered the most vibrant party in the country deliberately sabotaged Islam and undermined Muslims, their Imams/Leaders, in a broad day light, Nying Juma Lung Baa, the future of the mainstream Islam in this country really scared me.

The manner in which this action was done, has triggered a question;
Did Ahmadiyah Jam’at finance or immensely contribute in financing this Congress?


Links and Related Essay’s

Ahmadiyya #Ahmadiyyainafrica #ahmadiyyainthegambia #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution

An Ahmadi claimed prophethood in late-1901 or early 1902, and was boycotted by Ahmadis–Chiragh Din of Jammu (Jamooni)

I have researched the split in the Ahmadiyya movement very closely…somehow, Mahmud Ahmad and Muhammad Ali purposely avoided talking about Chiragh Din of Jammu (Jamooni) and his claim of prophethood which caused MGA to ex-communicate him and to organize a boycott against him.

What’s really interesting here is that MGA had just claimed prophethood in Nov 1901, with the publishing of his announcement, “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala”.  Amrohi had even written a letter to some people who didn’t quite understand this “change in belief” that MGA had just done, his letter can be found here.

The scans

He said while criticizing a person named ‘Charag Deen’ who announced that he would reconcile Christianity and Islam:
“We have no accord with Christianity, because it is all evil and wrong… How can we reconcile (with the Christians) while our religion and our holy book consider the entire Christianity to be filthy and evil?… Woe! He (Charag Deen) considered the Disgusting Christianity in the same degree with Islam!”. 
(Announcement dated 23/04/1902, Announcements, Vol 2)

Chiragh deen of jammu claimed prophethood and mirza boycotted charagh deen (ref: ruhani khazain, vol 18 page 242). MGA published an ad in rohani khazain about charagh deen jamu to inform everyone that he is no more in his community or in jamaat e ahmdiya. (ref: rohani khazain vol 18. page 239).

Another source
See “Haqiqatul Wahy”, online english edition, page: 289

“”””Thus, first, Maulawi Rusul Baba, resident of Amritsar is worth mentioning who wrote a book in my refutation; he used very abusive language and lied out of love for this temporary life. Eventually, in keeping with the promise of God, he was destroyed by the plague.  After him, there was another person named Muhammad Bakhsh, a Deputy Inspector at Batala, who girded up his loins for hostility and persecution. He too died of the plague. After him another person,
named Charagh Din of Jammu, arose. He claimed to be a Messenger.  He referred to me as the Dajjal [Antichrist] and claimed that during a dream, Hadrat ‘Isa had given him his staff that he might kill this Dajjal with the staff of ‘Isa. He, too, along with both of his sons died of plague
on 4 April 1906 in accordance with my prophecy that was specifically about him and was published during his lifetime in my booklet Dafi‘ul-Bala’i wa Mi‘yaru Ahlil-Istifa’. Where did the staff of ‘Isa go with which he sought to kill me? And what happened to his ‘revelation’, namely اّنی لمن المرسلین [‘I indeed am of the Messengers’]? Alas! Most people pronounce their egoistic suggestions to be revelation prior to self-purification. This is why they eventually die in ignominy and disgrace.””””

ROR of May 1906 mentions Chiragh Din and MGA’s prayer against all false prophets
See page 211.

ROR of June 1906 also mentions Chiragh Din
See page 251.

Links and Related Essays

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Mirza Nasir Ahmad’s Friday Sermon, just a few days after the Rabwah train attack of May 29th, 1974

As we all know, Mirza Nasir Ahmad knew that Ahmadis were set to attack the teenagers of the Nishter Medical College on May 29th, 1974. He left town on that very day and will never write or talk about his whereabouts on that day, nor did Mirza Tahir Ahmad ever comment on his location during the attacks, Mirza Masroor is also silent.  Whatever the case may be, I have re-produced the speech that was made just after the train attacks.  He basically admits that some rogue-Ahmadis did in-fact attack the teenagers and hurt them.

The speech

Mirza Nasir Ahmad’s Khutbah of May 31st, 1974

Here is a Friday Sermon right after the attack in which Hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad (rh) has addressed this incident: pages 534-536

Khutbat-e-Nasir Vol 5 Page 533
Khutba Jummah 31 May 1974

Saari dunya ki taaqatain mil kar bhi ghalba Islam ke khuda’i mansoobay ko na-kaam nahi bana sakteen.

Khutba jummah farmoodah 31 May 1974 ba-muqaam masjid aqsa rabwah.

Ta’ashud o ta’awuz aur surah fatiha ki tilawat ke baad huzur anwar ne darj zeel aayat-e-kareema tilawat farmaeen: (Quran Ch 34 verse 36).

Phir huzur anwar ne farmaya:

Ummat mussalma ko in aayaat me in bunyadi sadaaqataun se mut’araf karaya gaya hai. Ek to yeh ke agar ummat mussalma Allah ta’ala ki ita’at aur Muhammd (SAW) ki ita’at se amlan baahir nikalnay ki kaushish karay to un ke a’maal ka maud nateeja nahi niklay ga aur un ke a’amaal baatal ho jaein ge aur doosray yeh ke dunya jitna chaahay zaur laga lay vo ummat mussalma par, agar vo ummat Islam par haqeeqi mani me qaim ho kabhi ghalib nahi aa sakti.

Alw aur ghalba ummat mussalma ke hee muqaddar me hai aur us ki waja yeh hai farmaya ‘wallaahu ma’a kum’
Ke in ka ek haqeeqi ta’aluq Allah ta’ala se hota hai aur jis ka haqeeqi aashiqana aur aajizana ta’aluq Allah ta’ala se ho, us ke naik amaal, vo amaal jin ke acchay nateejay nikaltay hain, jin amaal ke nateejay me Allah ta’ala ki razaa pehlay se ziyada haasil hoti rehti hai un amaal me kammi nahi aati balkay izaafa hota rehta hai.

Khuda ta’ala ki safaat ka har doosra jalwa pehlay se barrh kar haseen, pehlay se ziyadah azeem un kay saamnay zaahir hota hai. Pas hamaray muqaam ki pehli shart yeh hai ke Allah ta’ala ki ita’at kee jaey aur us ke rasool ki ita’at kee jaey. Hamein sakhti se is baat ki taakeer kee gaee thi ke gaaliyaun ka jawaab dua’aun se dena aur jab kisi ki taraf se dukh diya jaaey to us ka jawaab is rang me ho ke us ke liye such ka samaan paida kiya jaey.
Isi liye pichlay jummah ke maukeh par bhi mainay ek rang me jamaat ko khasoosan jamaat ke nau-javaanaun ko yeh naseehat kee thi ke yeh tumhara muqaam hai, issay samjho aur kissi ke liye dukh ka ba’is na bano aur dunga fasaad me shaamil na ho aur jo kuch khuda ne tumhay diya hai vo tumharay liye taskeen ka bhi ba’as hai, taraqiyaat ka bhi ba’as hai. Vo hai sabr aur dua ke saath apni zindagi ke lamhaat guzaarna.

Sabr aur dua ke saath apni zindagi ke lamhaat guzaaro magar ahle rabwah me se chand ek ne is naseehat ko ghaur se suna nahi aur is par amal nahi kiya aur jo fasaad ke halaat jaan bhooj kar aur jaisa ke qaraeen batatay hain barri sochi samjhi scheme aur mansooba ke matehet bana-aey gaey thay us ko samjhay baghair josh me aa kar vo fasaad ki kefeeyat jis ke paida karnay ki kaushish kee gaee thi mukhalfat ki tadbeer ko kaamyaab bananay me hissay-daar ban gaey aur fasaad ka maujab huay.

29 May ko station par yeh waqiah hua. Is waqt us waqiah ki 2 shakalain dunya ke saamnay aati hain. Ek vo jo intehai ghalat aur baatil shakal hai maslan ek roznama ne likha ke paanch hazaar ne hamla kar diya. Maslam yeh ke (ahmadiyaun ki taraf se) sochi samjhi scheme ke matehet aisa kiya gaya waghera waghera.
Yeh bilkul ghalat hai is me shak nahi lekin doosri shakal yeh hai ke kuch aadmiyaun ne bahr-haal apnay muqaam se gir kar aur khuda aur us ke rasool ki ita’at ko chhorr tay huey fasaad ka jo mansooba dushmanaun ki taraf se banaya gaya tha ussay kaamyaab karnay me shaamil ho gaey. Is se inkaar nahi kiya jaa sakta aur chunkay aisa hua aur agar dushman ko aap kay 10 aadmi ek hazaar nazar aatay hain to is se aap ki bura’at nahi hoti yeh to Allah ta’ala ki shaan hai lekin aap ki bura’at is se nahi hoti jitney bhi us jhagray me shaamil huay.

Unhaun ne ghalti ki aur savaaey nafrat aur muzamat ke izhaar ke, un ke is fayl ke khilaaf hum kuch kar nahi saktay na Imam jamaat ahmadiyya aur na jamaat ahmadiyya. Is liye unhaun ne to ghalti kee aur chunkay vo dushman ki sochi samjhi tadbeer thi aur ek nihayat bhiyanak mansooba mulk ko kharaab aur tabaa karnay ke liye banaya gaya tha, ab is me aap ka ek hissa shaamil ho gaya aur ab mulk ke ek hissay me aag lagi hui hai aur is aag ko is rang me hawa dee jaa rahi hai ke yeh shiddat ikhtiyaar karay gi.

Yeh aag jahaan lagi hai wahaan 1953 ki aag se ziyada shadeed taur par lagi hui hai. Is waqt hakoomat-e-waqt ziyada tadbar (intellectively) aur ziyada insaaf se kaam le rahi thi. Is waqt jo reportain aa rahi agar vo durust hain to in se yeh nateeja nikal sakta hai ke hakoomat-e-waqt na tadbar se kaam le rahi hai aur na insaaf se kaam le rahi hai.

Bahr-haal yeh to tehqeeq ke baad hee pata lagay ga lekin is se inkaar nahi kiya jaa sakta ke jin hissaun me aag lagi hai wahaan 1953 se ziyada shiddat ke saath is fasaad ke shelay bharrak rahay hain aur is ke nateejay me ba’az Ahmadi-aun ke dilaun me ghabraahatt bhi paida ho sakti hai.

Mein haqeeqat bayaan karnay ke liye yeh kehta houn warna mera yeh kaam nahi tha ke mein yeh bataaoun ke un ko kya karna chahiye. Jo sayasatdaan hain un ko apna mufaad khud samajhna chahiye. Agar nahi samjhain ge to dunya me hakoomatain aati bhi hain jaati bhi hain. Meri is se koi gharz nahi mein to mazabhi aadmi houn. Naseehat karna mera kaam hai, un ko bhi ek rang me naseehat kar dee. Samjhana samajhna uk ka kaam hai lekin asal cheez mein aap ke saamnay awwal yeh laana chahta houn ke jinhaun ne bhi ghalti kee, ghalti kee hai aur humein is cheez ko tasleem karna chahiye.

Doosray yeh ke sirf unhaun ne ghalti nahi ki balkay unhaun ne apni na-samjhi ke nateejay me dushman ke ek sochay samjhay mansoobay me shamuliyat kee aur jamaat ke liye bhi pareshaani ke saamaan paida karnay ke maujab banay aur mulk ke liye bhi kamzori ka saamaan paida karnay ka maujab banay, mein samajhta houn aur mein unhain yeh naseehat karna chahta houn ke vo kam az kam das hazaar martaba astaghfar karein aur tauba karein aur Allah ta’ala se apnay gunah ki maafi maangain. Jo bhi is maamlay me shaamil huay hain mujhay un ka ilm nahi lekin jo bhi shaamil huay hain vo kam az kam das hazaar martaba astaghfar karein aur khuda ta’ala ke hazoor aajizana jhukain aur apni bhalai ke liye aur khud ko Allah ta’ala ki naraazgi se bachnay ke liye das hazaar martaba us se maafi maangain aur us ke hazoor aajizana jhukay rahain jab tak Allah ta’la unhain maaf na kar de.

Doosri baat mein jamaat ke mukhlis, samajhdaar, fidaai hissay ko yeh batana chahta houn ke aag to barri shiddat se bharkaai gai hai lekin yeh na-kaam ho gi. Insha’Allah ta’ala na-kaami is menay me nahi ke kisi Ahmadi ko bhi mukhtalif qism ki qurbaniyaan nahi daini parrain gi. Vo to daini parrain gi jab tak jamaat-e-ahmadiyya ke ahbaab vo aur is kism ki tamaam qurbaaniyaan khuda ke hazoor paish nahi kartay jo qurbaaniyaan ke nabi akram sallal laahu alaihi wassallam ke sahaba ne khuda ke huzoor paish ki theen us waqt tak vo un inamaat ko bhi haasil nahi kar saktay jo sahaba nabi akram sallal laahu alaihi wassallam ne rab kareem se haasil kiye thay lekin dunya ke kisi damaagh me agar yeh baat aaey ke saari dunya ki taaqatain mil kar bhi Allah ta’ala ki ghalba Islam ki is tadbeer aur Allah ta’ala ke ghalba Islam ke is mansoobay ko na-kaam bana sakti hain jis gharz ke liye ke jamaat ahmadiyya qaim kee gai thi to hamaray nazdeek vo ruhaniyat se door honay ki waja se na-samjhi ke halaat rakhnay wala hai. Yeh to ho nahi sakta ke khuda ta’ala ka yeh mansooba na-kaam ho jaey….

.Aur muhabbat aur pyaar ke saath in logaun ke dilaun ko jeeto jo apni na-samjhi ki waja se yeh samajhtay hain ke vo aap ke dushman hain. Tum ne yeh saabit karna hai ke tum un ke dushman nahi ho balkay tum hee un ke kheraah ho, tum hee un ke haqeeqi pyaar karnay waalay ho, tum hee un ke dukhaun ko door karnay ke liye paida kiye gaey ho. Tum ne un ke oopar itna ihsaan karna hai ke un ko Muhammad sallal laahu alaihi wassallam ke ihsaan ki ma’arfat haasil ho jaaey. Vo chotti bohot hi buland hai jahaan tak Muhammad sallal laahu alaihi wassallam ka ihsaan pohnchaya lekin khaardaar jhaarriyaan beech me hain vo nazar nahi aa raheen. In khaardaar jhaarriyaun ko tum ne muhabbat aur pyaar ke saath saaf karna hai aur phir is muhabbat aur pyaar ke nateejay me jo ek noorani fiza paida ho gi us se unhain pata lagay ga ke hamara musan-e-azeem jo tha (sallal laahu alaihi wassallam) us ka kya muqaam tha.

Is ke liye kaushish karni hai. Chhotti chhotti baataun ke peechay parr kar apnay auqaat zaa’eh na karo aur khwa waqti taur par hee kyoun na ho doosraun ko ibtila me na ddaalo aur jo aisay mansoobay hain jo ghlaba Islam ki raah me rrorray urrkanay walay hain un mansoobaun me khud ko shaamil na karo. Tum is kaam ke liye nahi paida kiye gaey. Dua-ain karo aur sabr se kaam lo aur hammah waqt khidmat ke liye tayyaar raho aur jis shakhs ko yeh vehm hai ke vo aap ka ashad tareen dushman hai apni pyaari khidmat ke saath us ke is vehm ko door karnay ki kaushish karo ta ke jo hum chahtay hain vo humein jald tareen mil jaey. Khuda karay ke aisa hi ho.

Links and Related Essay’s


#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian


Ahmadis get schooled at Speakers Corner again

Ahmadis use the same arguments over and over again.  It’s as-if they never read our counter-arguments, and they just continue to act as-if our “counter-arguments” don’t exist.  We have refuted the Ahmadi interpretations of Tawaffi in the Quran many times.  In this video at 6:26, this Muslim explains 39:42 and destroys the Ahmadi arguments on Tawaffi.

Ahmadis brag about being the exact people who walked Bhutto to get hanged

Ahmadis are a fanatical bunch of people. They were radicalized by the Mirza family.  In this specific case, this Ahmadi admits to working in the jail wherein Bhutto was being held and awaiting execution. As we all know, Ahmadis see the “hanging” of Bhutto as a divine sign in the favor of Ahmadiyya, in fact, Ahmadis see the death of any of their opponents as such, however, they close their eyes when their own people die in the same way. In reality, the Mirza family wanted Bhutto to be killed, since Zia was an undercover Qadiani.

The video

Links and Related Essay’s

Kashif N Chaudhry


Major Gen. Iftikhar Janjua Shaheed, only Pakistani general to have laid his life during military combat was an Ahmadi Muslim. 

View image on Twitter

Kashif N Chaudhry


Pakistan’s 1st Chief of Air Staff & leading general in Pakistan Air Force, Air Marshal Zafar Ahmad Chaudhry, was also Ahmadi. 

View image on Twitter
44 people are talking about this

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian #drabdussalam #abdussalam #salamonnetflix #drsalam #zia #ziaulhaq #ordxx

Ahmadiyya leadership banned Facebook in 2011, then backpeddled on it…

This entry is taken from here:

In one of the most amazing setbacks in the history of the Ahmadiyya, the leadership has ordered a ban on Facebook. In fact, the ban appears to extend to all social networking activities. All accounts are to be deleted immediately. Mirza Masroor, the supreme spiritual head and it appears, Führer of the Ahmadiyya, delivered his edict in Germany, of all places, just two days after we exposed one of his rising and personally-approved stars as, well, a bit of a jack-the-lad really. With egg on his face, and realising that the Internet has damaged Ahmadiyya perhaps irreperably, His Holiness in a fit of pique threw out the baby with the bathwater. Surely the irony of a supreme leader claiming to be leader of a single undivided nation, banning free speech on a social network with “book” in its name couldn’t have been lost on at least some of the Ahmadis present?

The move beggars belief. Other than the obvious sign that the Ahmadiyya leadership, intellectually bankrupt, is on the run from the rational arguments that have shattered its cloistered, cultish worldview and logically incoherent theology all over the Internet, the clear signal here is that when a cult cannot control the discourse, it prevents its members from engaging in that discourse. When Ahmadis start to see the truth through these social networking sites (and surely, blogs, like these, like some of the Ahmadiyya propaganda sites also fall under that category) they begin to turn away from Ahmadiyya and towards freedom. The leadership can’t afford to lose its cash cows. One recent revert to Islam from Ahmadiyya was paying thousands of pounds a year in cult tax. He simply can’t believe how brainwashed he was.

Disingenuously, the Ahmadiyya mouthpiece and serial DMCA-filer Nasim Rehmatullah is taking questions on this latest astounding move. The first question is tellingly, why is the Ahmadiyya Organisation allowed to have its own Facebook page? The less than satisfactory answer is that it exists to counter anti-Ahmadiyya propaganda and that it can be accessed without an account. So wait, you are allowed to visit social networking sites, you just can’t use them. Please tell me if you can spot the flaw in that one. It appears that all Facebook accounts are equal, but that some are more equal than others.

I think the lady doth protest too much. Here is a man who filed multiple DMCA notices to have Youtube videos, which included quotations from “holy books” a century old removed for “copyright violations” (they were all reinstated, much to his chagrin). Here he is again, fronting an operation in which tens of thousands of Ahmadis the world over have effectively been cut off from the most important advance in the history of communications – social networking.

Rehmatullah’s reasoning suggests that Ahmadis are being banned from Facebook because they are not equipped to answer anything put to them. One has to search a little more carefully to find the real reason. Every social interaction of Ahmadis, or engagement with the real world, leaves them vulnerable to making the “saved sect” look anything but saved. It also leaves them vulnerable to the truth – there are the continued efforts of many Muslims to calmly rebut Ahmadiyya canards and present the truth, with no personal or collective agenda other than the betterment of the ordinary Ahmadi’s condition. The option is stark. If you want to use social networking, you’ll have to leave Ahmadiyya to do it.

The Ahmadiyya ban on Facebook extends to all “similar sites”. No Facebook. No Twitter. No LinkedIn. No nothing. Remember, YouTube is a social networking site – will the Führer ban that too? The Ahmadiyya has basically shut down all free speech within its movement. Nobody is allowed to say anything to anyone, to be anything, to have an existence on-line. One of Masroor’s reasons for banning Facebook and social networking is because “shameful things happen there”. Well, shameful things happen in bedrooms too, will he be banning those?

Muslims are free to use Facebook or any other social network as they see fit. There isn’t, and  probably never will be a centrally controlled singular Facebook group for Islam or Muslims. The Ahmadiyya move is the most retrograde and extremist attack on the free speech of people anywhere in the world. Even the Saudis haven’t banned Facebook. Even the Taliban use Twitter! Let’s be clear, this move by the Ahmadiyya is the biggest infringement on civil liberties ever made by a cult that has the brazen temerity, the Orwellian gall to boast “Freedom” on its bus adverts, paid for out of the pockets of its victims. It is rank extremism and needs to be declared as such by every clear thinking person in Britain today.

Ahmadiyya is an extremist cult that pretends to be cuddly. Some well-meaning people in parliamentary circles have been temporarily fooled by this shallow front. The police and certain councillors in South London have not and the sooner everyone wakes up to the routine deception of the Ahmadiyya, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, the better.

Up ↑