Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Month

October 2016

MGA writes in opposition to the Islamic view of the miraculous birth of Esa (as)

Intro
Noorudin and his team (Maulvi Abdul Kareem and Mufti Sadiq) believed that Esa (as) had a biological father before they had ever met Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, they took this new belief from Sir Syed, who wrote it in 1880. They all worked together in Jammu, with Noorudin being the boss. Nonetheless, Noorudin and his team held the belief that Esa (as) had a biological father until 1903, wherein it is reported by Noorudin himself that he was forced to change his position on the order of MGA. However, after MGA died, per Lahori-Ahmadi sources, Noorudin ordered Muhammad Ali to write in his commentary of the Quran that Esa (As) had a biological father.  The Qadiani branch went on to call the miraculous birth of Esa (as) as less then a miracle and some sort of rationally explained phenomenon. Obviously, the classic islamic view is that Esa (as) was born miraculously, just like Adam (as). By the will of Allah.  

In 1917, the Lahori-Ahmadi, via Muhammad Ali accused Eisa (as) of having a biological father in his famous commentary of 1917. In 1927, the Ahmadiyya Movement claimed that Parthenogenesis created Eisa (as), not allah. In the 1990’s, Mirza Tahir Ahmad was openly calling Maryam a hermaphrodite (astagfarullah).
Continue reading “MGA writes in opposition to the Islamic view of the miraculous birth of Esa (as)”

MGA claims that Arabs drank alcohol 5 times per day

Intro
MGA and his team made many strange remarks about Muhammad (saw) and his companions. In one such statement, MGA claims that the reason that Allah ordered Muslims to pray 5 times per day was because that was the frequency of alcohol consumption in their culture.

The Quote
“””Five times prayer was set because arabs use to drink alchol five times a day .even it is approved by Quran that every sect got the (a person )to warn ………”””
( ref : malfozat 5 page 182 )

r s t

MGA mis-quotes hadith in 1898

Intro
MGA and his team mis-quoted the Quran and hadith many times in their business career.  Here is another example.  This quote seems to be from 1898, before MGA claimed prophethood.

The Quote
“”””It is written in Prophetic Ahadith that at the time of the advent of the Promised Messiah, this dispersal of spirituality will be such that women will begin to receive revelation, juveniles will prophecy and common people will speak with the Holy Spirit.”””

12360021_1633072556958436_6568424017004555819_n  12345

The error
This story comes from the Bible, not Islamic tradition.  Below is the quote from the Bible.  

Acts 2:16-18New King James Version (NKJV)

16 But this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel:

17 ‘And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God,
That I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh;
Your sons and your daughters shall prophesy,
Your young men shall see visions,
Your old men shall dream dreams.
18 And on My menservants and on My maidservants
I will pour out My Spirit in those days;
And they shall prophesy.

Conclusion
Opium is a hellauva drug.  MGA and his friends kept mixing their chai with opium and thus misquotes much of islamic tradition. 

MGA says that only he will ever be called a “Prophet” (1907), no one else

Intro
In 1907, MGA gives an exhaustive explanation as to why only he was given the title of prophet in the entire ummah of Islam.  This is a contradictory position, since we know that Ahmadis argue that prophethood is open and available for all.  Further, Ahmadis from the Qadiani sect believe that their Khilafat will last til the day of judgement.  Moreover, they secretly believe that only a Khalifa of Ahmadiyya will ever be able to claim prophethood.

Further, in 1916, Mahmud Ahmad vehemently wrote that even 1000 prophets can come and etc etc etc.  However, that is a cleverly crafted double-statement.  Since, in the depths of his heart, Mahmud Ahmad wanted to secure a Khilafat for him and his family.

The Quote
“”From one aspect I am an ‘ummatee’ [follower] and from another aspect, due to the beneficence of the prophethood of His Holiness [Muhammad], blessings of Allaah and peace be upon him, [I] am also a prophet. And the intent of [the term] prophet is only [to connote] that I receive abundant converse and address from God Almighty. The point is that, as Mujaddid Saahib Sarhindee [Sarhindee the Reviver] has written in his books, even though some individuals of this [Muslim] nation have [received or do receive] the special [treatment of] Godly converse and address and will remain special [receiving this treatment] till Resurrection but the person who is honored abundantly with this converse and address and who is abundantly made aware of matters of the unseen, that [person] is called a prophet. Now let it be clear that it
has been prophesied in the Prophet’s hadeeths that, from among the followers of His Holiness [Muhammad], blessings of Allaah and peace be upon him, a person will appear [or be born] who will be referred to as E’esaa [Jesus] and ibn-e-Maryam [son of Mary] and will be known by the name of [i.e., known as] a prophet. … And this thing is a proven matter that the extent to which God Almighty has made converse and address with me and the extent to which matters of the unseen have been made known to me, no person besides myself has been granted this favor in thirteen hundred Hijree [calendar] years. If some person denies this, the burden of proof is on his neck [i.e., on him]. The point is that in this abundant portion of Godly revelation and unseen matters, from this [Muslim] nation, I am the only special individual and all the ‘auliyaa’ [saints or friends of God] and ‘abdaal’ [saints who move from place to place to hide from public view] and ‘aqtaab’ [religious mendicants, holding a special title of rank] who have gone by before me in this [Muslim] nation – they were not given this abundant portion of this favor/blessing. Hence, for this reason, only I was specially selected for getting the name [i.e., title] of prophet and all the other people are not deserving of this name [i.e., title] because abundance of revelation and abundance of [perception of] unseen matters is a condition of this and that condition is not found in them. And it was necessary that it should have been so, so that the prophecy of His
Holiness [Muhammad], blessings of Allaah and peace be upon him, could have been fulfilled with clarity. Because, if other righteous ones who have preceded me, [if] they too, to the same extent, had received a portion of Godly converse and address and unseen matters, they would have become deserving of being known as prophets [and] then in that case a crack [or fault] would have occurred in the prophecy of His Holiness [Muhammad], blessings of Allaah and peace be upon him. That is why the wisdom of God Almighty prevented those respected people from obtaining this favor in a complete manner, just as it appears in authentic hadeeths that such a person will be one only [so that] that prophecy be fulfilled. [RK, v. 22, pp. 406-407; starts at 4th line from top of p. 406, skips some lines below middle of p. 406, then goes on
till about middle of p. 407; Haqeeqat-ul-Wahee; published May 1907]”””

1908 Quote
“””This word ‘nabuwwat’ [prophethood] that has been adopted [i.e., adopted by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad] is entirely from God Almighty. A person to whom some thing [some item of information] is abundantly conveyed by God Almighty, by way of prophecy, [such a person] is referred to as a ‘nabee’ [prophet]. … Remember that the chain [or system] of prophethood will remain established till Resurrection [‘silsilah-enabuwwat qayaamat tak qaa-im rahay gaa’]. [MALFOOZAAT, v. 10, p. 451; recorded under the date May 25, 1908]””””

Some conclusions
It seems that MGA was looking to deter Ahmadis from claiming prophethood.  This is the argument that him and his team came up with.  MGA claimed prophethood in 1901, and claimed that anyone could become a prophet, however, just a few years later, he changed him mind.

MGA and his team also forget that in the 1898 era, MGA wrote that:

“”””It is written in Prophetic Ahadith that at the time of the advent of the Promised Messiah, this dispersal of spirituality will be such that women will begin to receive revelation, juveniles will prophecy and common people will speak with the Holy Spirit.”””  See here.

 

Ahmadis in the Israeli Military??

Intro
This blog entry was spawned as a result of some research work that I did many years ago. I found some data about Ahmadis in Israel which was incorrect. The reference claimed that there were many Ahmadis serving in the Israeli military as of 1972. That is not true. The reference simply says that there are 600 Ahmadis in Israel by 1972, and it incorrectly states that they are from Pakistan. It then says that since they are citizens, they can also serve in the Israeli military.

Also watch my video on the history of Ahmadiyya in Israel herein and my tik tok and instagram video.
Continue reading “Ahmadis in the Israeli Military??”

Izala Auham (1891), Part-1 and 2, quotes and background information

Intro
Izala Auham is a book that Ahmadis will never translate. MGA and his team made lots of errors in this book. This blog entry is simply an attempt to collect all the refs from this book and present them to the world. Izala Auham, Ruhani khazian vol 3, and encompasses these pages numbers, Part 1 – pp.1-424, Part 2 – 426-1000. Part-2 seems to have been published in September of 1891 as mentioned on page 948. Muhammad Ali had also written that this book was published in September of 1891 (In 1915, see Prophethood in Islam). Nuzhat Haneef says,
The title page of Izaalah-e-Auhaam [RK, v. 3, p. 101] is dated Dhul Hijjah 1308 AH. The year 1308 AH lasted from August 1890 to August 1891 AD. Further, in the book Mirza Ghulam Ahmad reproduces a letter dated June 1891 [RK, v. 3, p. 482]. Therefore, it seems that the book was published between June 1891 and August 1891.

Shaikh Noor Ahmad had this book published at the Riaz e Hind Press. On the cover of this book, he writes “Mujadid of the time”, “Messenger (Mursal-e-yadanee) of God”, “The Appointed (mamur-e rahmani) of the gracious Allah” and “Messiah of the Time”. This book was received in the British library on January of 1893.

MGA also claimed that 1000’s of additional Messiah’s could appear in the future, this has led to many new claimants within #ahmadiyya.
Continue reading “Izala Auham (1891), Part-1 and 2, quotes and background information”

Ahmadis lie about Malfoozaat

Intro
We all know that Ahmadis have been editing and inventing writings or sayings of MGA since at least 1882.  This entry exposes the fraud of Malfoozat and how they continued to publish material from thin air, as Mahmud Ahmad continued to create new data that supported his family business aka the ahmadiyya khilafat.

The story of Malfoozat
Mulfoozat printed in 1936-Jild 1-so if they were able to print and compile this in 1936 – It covers the time of MGA life from 1891-1899 – He dies in 1908 and also he was progressively getting ill -how on earth Mulfoozat become so many volumes -did they collect it from islamic books and made volumes outof them? where is the vol 2 -which they promised – printed 1936 – pakistan comes into being in 1947 -the years between 1936 and 1947 – there was so much turmoil that next printing of Ruhani Khazian (mulfoozat was part of it)started in 1960,s in rabwah- so my point is that how this one volume becomes 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or however many.

14633017_1636701679962664_5227103347557738644_n

 

Sir Syed’s view on Esa (as)–1882

Intro
Obviously, MGA took all of his theories on religion from other people.  Sir Syed began publishing his commentary of the Quran in 1880, however, the section which concerns Esa (as) was published (see Nuzhat Haneef) in 1882, MGA almost immediately began calling himself as “like-esa” or “Maseel-e-Maseeh”. It’s important to note that it was Noorudin who urged MGA to do so. Later on, MGA also copied Sir Syed’s swoon theory and passed it off as his own (see Jesus in India, 1908 and Nuzhat Haneef). MGA also attracted lots of people who were already following Sir Syed’s new ideas on Islam, like Maulvi Abdul Karim and others. Sir Syed also denied the entire concept of the Mahdi in this era. The truth is that MGA knew about the new beliefs of Sir Syed as early as 1872 and began to slowly adopt them. However, he lied about his true beliefs from 1876–1890.
Continue reading “Sir Syed’s view on Esa (as)–1882”

Noorudin and Abdul Karim were influenced by Sir Syed

Intro
As we all know, Noorudin, Maulvi Abdul Karim and MGA were all influenced by the writings of Sir Syed. Sir Syed denied all miracles in Islam by 1880, he denied the Islamic creation theory, the return of Esa (as), the arrival of the Mahdi, the physicality of the Mir’aj, all the hadith work, etc etc etc. Obviously, Noorudin and Abdul Karim knew each other in 1880 and in the below I present data which proves this fact. They would all eventually join MGA’s team of Mullahs and ghost writers, Maulvi Abdul Karim, Maulvi Mufti Muhammad Sadiq, Maulvi Sher Ali, Hakim Fazl Din of Bhera, Noorudin and many others. Some other people who came independently, yet still joined MGA’s team was Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi, who was also a member of the Ahl-e-Hadith sect, in fact, uptil his job with MGA, he worked for the founder of the Ahl-e-Hadith sect, Syed Nazeer Husain from Delhi and Siddiq Hasan Khan of Bhopal. Maulvi Muhammad Ali was another, however, he came via Khwaja Kamaluddin and the prominent Ahmadi’s of Lahore.
Continue reading “Noorudin and Abdul Karim were influenced by Sir Syed”

Up ↑