ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Watching the International Bait, I noticed something bizarre. The Khalifa sits down, and you can clearly see his son, Mirza Waqas Ahmad, sitting behind him without a mask. He sits there for a while, takes off his sunglasses (yes, indoors), the camera cuts away, and when it comes back, the sunglasses are gone, and suddenly he’s wearing a mask.

In the Shorts version you can’t see it because YouTube crops the sides. In the full video it’s visible: https://youtu.be/5W_Jnu-3cpU

The point isn’t whether Mirza Waqas Ahmad wore a mask 30 seconds later. The point is that we’re in 2026 and the Jamaat is still enforcing these bizarre rules around the Khalifa.

Everyone around him has to wear a mask. People handing him things are even wearing gloves. Yet his own son is sitting right behind him without a mask until the camera cuts away. That doesn’t exactly scream “strict health protocol.”

And we’ve seen the same double standard before. When Western guests are around, like at the Peace Symposium, suddenly nobody is wearing masks: not the guests and not the Ahmadis around the Khalifa. So which is it? Are these measures actually necessary, or are they just for show when the audience is primarily Ahmadi? To me, it looks like the rules are for everyone else, while the Khalifa’s family gets a pass. That’s the point of the post.

Continue reading “Unlike most Ahmadi’s, Mirza Waqas Ahmad doesn’t have to wear a mask around the Khalifa, his father, #ukjalsa #2026UKjalsa #jalsaconnect #ukjalsa2026” →

Intro
In the 1940’s, Selma was born. Slema was brought up in a Christian Household in Yorkshire, England. Selma was the eldest of three sisters. Selma’s maternal grandfather was a Methodist preacher, her maternal grandmother was involved in many Church activities. Selma’s mother ran the Church drama group, her father ran the boys brigade. Slema became a Sunday school teacher in her my teens and at times attended weekend Christian prayer groups when she was about sixteen or seventeen years old. Selma explained how they were taught, they were given talks and film shows of missionary work in the Zambezi Valley of Africa.

In the 1950’s, when Selma was about ten years old, she was with her grandfather after he had given the evening sermon in a small country Chapel… she clearly remember somebody saying that if Jesus came now we would not reject him as the Jews did. Another church member mentioned about a man in India who claimed to be the Promised Messiah and made a derogatory remark. Her grandfather quietly said ‘how do we know he is not?’ That memory came back to her just when she most needed reassurance and she felt that had her grandfather been alive he would have supported her.

In the 1960’s, Selma was working as a nurse and met Dr. Saeed Ahmad Khan in a hospital in Scotland, the two of them fell in love and in 1970 had a baby named Karim Khan. It’s not clear if she has officially converted to Ahmadiyya. She had 2 more sons and a daughter. Another one of her sons is semi-famous, Imran Ahmad Khan (see in the photo too). Mahmood Threlkeld and Khalid Khan are also her sons. I wasn’t able to track her daughter.

In 1989 (Mar-24), Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IV and Maulana Ataul Mujeeb Rashid, Imam of the London Mosque with some British born Ahmadis at Islamabad on the occasion of the Ahmadiyya Centenary. The children of Dr. Saeed Ahmad Khan and Selma Mubaraka Ahmad Khan were also there, Karim Khan, Imran Ahmad Khan, Khalid Khan and Mahmood Threlkeld.

In 1989, Selma Mubaraka Khan wrote an article on “Women in Islam” in the Review of Religions of Sep-1987.

In 1993, her son, Karim Khan married a daughter of the Khalifa, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Sahibzadi Yasmin Rehman Mona (See the “Tariq Commemorative” of 2004, page 78).

In 1996, her husband, Dr. Saeed Ahmad Khan died.

In 2004, a photo of Karim Khan, his son and Mirza Tahir Ahmad appeared in the “Tariq Commemorative” of 2004 (See page 78).

in 2022, a photo of her and her infamous son, Imran Ahmad Khan was posted on social media.

Continue reading “Who is Selma Mubaraka Ahmad Khan?” →

Intro
Dr. Saeed Ahmad Khan was the father of the Karim Khan and Imran Ahmad Khan, both guilty of sexual crimes.

In 1936, he was born.

In 1961, Dr. Saeed Ahmad Khan moved to the UK, when there was barely any Qadiani-Ahmadi’s in the UK. His wife was a white woman from the UK named Selma, she was a nurse who worked at the same hospital as his father. His family seem to have been fast friends with Muhammad Zafrullah Khan.

In 1971, Dr. Saeed Ahmad Khan was appointed consultant dermatologist for Wakefield. Dr. Saeed Ahmad Khan was the Amir of the north from the date the post was created until his death.

In 1989 (Mar-24), Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IV and Maulana Ataul Mujeeb Rashid, Imam of the London Mosque with some British born Ahmadis at Islamabad on the occasion of the Ahmadiyya Centenary. The children of Dr. Saeed Ahmad Khan and Selma Mubaraka Ahmad Khan were also there, Karim Khan, Imran Ahmad Khan, Khalid Khan and Mahmood Threlkeld.

In 1996, he died in December.

Continue reading “Who is Dr. Saeed Ahmad Khan?” →

Intro
In 2026 (Jul), a specific woman interviewed with PBS and told about how Karim Khan raped her repeatedly as he abused his power Ahmadiyya style! Her name seems to be unknown, however, her recollections are vivid, nasty, sad and synonymous with Ahmadiyya style blackmailing! Rana Tanveer commented on this recently too. Adnan Rashid has tweeted about this too! Let’s not forget about Karim Khan’s brother, Imran Ahmad Khan, who had his own rape case, against a boy! A homosexual fantasy!

Nevertheless, Khan’s accuser, named only ⁠as Sarah, recently told CNN that Khan had shown escalating behavior of touching and groping her, recounting a time she said he touched her intimately while she was pretending to be asleep. Her photo is posted in the below and she can be seen interviewing about all of this on PBS herein. Khan has denied any wrongdoing and his lawyers have called the process that led to the vote procedurally unfair and unsupported by evidence.

Continue reading “Did Karim Khan rape this woman?” →

Intro
In 2026 (Jul), the #2026UKjalsa was held in the UK, this is also the international Jalsa. Mirza Masroor Ahmad lied about Ahmadiyya progress and alleged that 267k new Ahmadi’s for 2025-2026 fiscal year (34:20 time stamp)(vast majority in Africa). Mirza Masroor Ahmad also alleged that 133 new Ahmadiyya temples were opened.

Mirza Masroor Ahmad alleged that 86 new jamaat were created in Benin, Congo-Brazz and Liberia were also in the rankings. Mirza Masroor Ahmad alleged that 172 new mosques/temples were opened by Ahmadiyya, of which 132 were new, again, mostly in Africa. In terms of new mission houses, Indonesia was 2nd.

Firstly the after looking at aerial shots of the Jalsa site, I counted a maximum of 3,000 cars and as you can see in this clip (from last year but my point still stands): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJzdcNCj2eY most cars are the 5 seater ones – and there are very few cars with much more capacity. So lets assume the cars with like 1 empty seat are compensated by the Buses and cars with more capacity – overall we assuming that there are ~3,000 “full” cars each with 5 seats which means around 15,000 people attending – no where near the 50k they claim.

Now if we assume that almost all people bar a few, who have duties around the site, go to the main marquee – this is another good way of counter checking our claim. Just to give an extra liberal estimate of the attendance lets assume that total even 1,000 people are volunteering scattered around the site and not in the Jalsa Gah during the Baiat ceremony. The areas of the main marquees are 50m by 140m for both the men and women sides. Link is here: https://www.alhakam.org/jalsa-uk-2023-update-20-july

Thus the total area of both the men and womens Jalsa Gah is 14,000 square metres. Lets also even assume that there are no chairs and everyone is sitting on the floor (you can seat more people on the ground compared to fitting chairs). If 90% of the marquees are usable for seating and the rest is for cameras, stage, equipment etc. there is still 12,600 sq meters of avilable seating. If one person only takes up 0.5sq metres of area (which is very densly packed btw) then you can fit 25,200 attendees at most across the two marquees.

This is a huge over estimate since we gave so much benefit of doubt. But even then there is NO WAY that the attendance figures are that high. Also most people that come to Jalsa don’t just go for one day so its not possible they had like 17k completely unique people coming in for each of the 3 days. It makes sense at most that they just counted the number of total AIMS ID’s scanned (not differentiating if they were unique or non-unique entries) – even then it seems fishy lol.

Continue reading “The 2026 UK Jalsa #ukjalsa #2026UKjalsa #jalsaconnect #ukjalsa2026” →

Intro
On Aug-16-2026, at the Hudawai cultural center in Huddersfield, UK, there will be a “Finality of Prophethood” seminar with Declan Henry, Sohail Bawa, Adnan Rashid and Bro Imtiaz via livestream.

Continue reading “On Aug-16-2026, at the Hudawai cultural center in Huddersfield, UK, there will be a “Finality of Prophethood” seminar with Declan Henry, Sohail Bawa, Adnan Rashid and Bro Imtiaz via livestream” →

Intro
Hud b. Muhakkam al-Huwwari, an early Ibaadi exegete of the third Hijri century in North Africa, he wrote a Tafsir called “Tafsir Kitab Allah al-‘Aziz”. It should be noted that Hud’s Tafsir is the only complete tafsir among early Ibaadi works in this field which still exists. Certain European scholars, especially French and British, have paid considerable attention to Ibadi history. British scholars dealt with Ibadi history in Oman while French scholars concerned themselves with Ibadi history in North Africa (See “Ibadi Tafsir with Special Reference to the Tafsirs of Hud al-Huwwarl and Sa”d ibn Ahmad al-Kindi” thesis by Sulaiman Ali Amer al-Shuaily, 2000).

In this Tafsir, in terms of 3:55, he says that wafah here is the one of raising ( i.e his explanation of mutawaffeeka), and he also adds another tafsir that it is taqdim and taakheer (via Ibn Abbas, mumeetuka) that Eisa (as) will be raised and then die when he descends. Hud b. Muhakkam al-Huwwari clearly believed Isa is alive and will descend. 

In this Tafsir, in terms of 5:116-117, Hud b. Muhakkam al-Huwwari says that this “wafah” is a raising to the heavens.

In terms of 4:157-159, Hud b. Muhakkam al-Huwwari says that Eisa (as) was not killed, raised to Allah, and will descend.

In 2000, in this thesis (See “Ibadi Tafsir with Special Reference to the Tafsirs of Hud al-Huwwarl and Sa”d ibn Ahmad al-Kindi” thesis by Sulaiman Ali Amer al-Shuaily, 2000), Ka’b Al-Ahbar was mentioned over 10 times, however, he never related any Israʼiliyyat about Eisa (as) and the cross and nothing about 4:158, 3:55 and all the common verses.

Continue reading “Hud b. Muhakkam al-Huwwari, an early Ibaadi exegete of the third Hijri century, he confirms the physical Nuzul of Eisa (as)” →

Intro
In 1880-1882, MGA denied that Eisa (as) raised the dead (see 3:49 of the Quran, 3:50 in the Kadiani Koran)(See also 5:110 of the Quran, 5:111 in the Kadiani Koran)(See Braheen e Ahmadiyya, Vol. 3, pages 229 and 233). MGA also denied the miracle of the snake of Musa (as)(See Braheen e Ahmadiyya, Vol. 3, pages 229 and 233. The verses of the Quran, which prove that Musa (as) dropped his rod and Allah turned it into a snake are covered in Chapter 20: 17-20 (See Tafsir ibn Kathir)(See the Kadiani Tafsir of these verses herein).

In 1882-1884, MGA quoted the Bible, John Verses 2-5 (make sure you read John, verses 1-15 to properly understand the context), as he denies the miracles of Jesus in the bible. However, MGA forgets to mention that the Quran, 3:49 had already confirmed the many miracles of Esa (as) and it specifically spoke of the instance in John wherein Esa (as) healed the blind, the sick, the lepers and brought a man back to life. In fact, in MGA’s first 10 books, he never mentioned the Quran, Chapter 3 verses 45-51 (See Braheen e Ahmadiyya, Vol. 4, pages 31-35, online English edition). MGA also scoffs at how some insects can be brought back to life with salt. MGA is making a mockery of the miracles of Esa (as).

In 1886, MGA called the miracle of the splitting of the moon a rare natural phenomenon like male humans/goats that give milk (a lie).

In 1891, MGA denied all miracles and accused Eisa (as) of mesmerism and slight of hand, Musa (as) also. #Ahmadis deny 26:63 (26:64 in the Qadiani Quran) of the Quran and claim that Musa (as) never split the sea, it was a low tide phenomenon. Watch Bro Imtiaz explain this whole thing herein. MGA kept going, in 1893, via his written debate with Athim, MGA denied the miraculous birth of Eisa (as)(See Ruhani Khazain volume 6 Jang-e-Muqadas page 280-281) and later on Qadiani-Ahmadi’s began to call Maryam a Hermaphrodite (astagfarullah) and argued that all miracles happened via science.

In 1891, MGA argued that in terms of 29:50 of the Quran, the people specifically wanted “punishment” (See “3 Questions by a Christian”, pages 11-12)(See also Dard, page 220).

In 1893, via his written debate with Athim, MGA denied the miraculous birth of Eisa (as)(See Ruhani Khazain volume 6 Jang-e-Muqadas page 280-281) and later on Qadiani-Ahmadi’s began to call Maryam a Hermaphrodite (astagfarullah) and argued that all miracles happened via science. In 2023, they have backtracked and only call it a possibility, however, to consider this a possibility is to cede and reject the signs of Allah.

In 1897-1898, MGA and his team of writers argued that the Christians have written about many miracles of (Jesus) but the fact is that he did not perform any miracle (moijza)(See Zamima Anjam-e-Atham, RK-v11 p.290).

In 1899, MGA and his team of writers alleged that Mirza Mubarak Ahmad (MGA’s son) spoke twice in his mothers womb. Tiryaqul-Qulub Page 119 (arabic edition), Tiryaqul-Qulub Page 80 (Lahori-Ahmadi version online), Ruhani Khazain, Volume-15, page 217, Tiryaq ul Quloob page 41.

In 1899, via Malfuzat-2, online English edition (page 102, updated via Raoof), MGA denied the miracle of the snake of Musa (as).

In 1902, MGA and his team of writers alleged that 3000 miracles were displayed by the Prophet Muhammad (saw) (See RK, Vol. 17, page 153, Tohfa Golarvia).

In 1903 (See Tadhkirat-ush-Shahadatain [1903] online english edition), MGA began to allege that he had a 100,000 predictions/prophecies fulfilled, and even if a few didn’t get fulfilled, like Athim and also the death of Ahmad Baig‘s son-in-law (Sultan Muhammad, married to Muhammadi Begum), that shouldn’t be a big issue.

In 1905 (Feb), MGA and his team of writers alleged that prophets are not magicians and do tricks for people, 29:50 was quoted (See Al-Badr, vol. 4, no. 6, p. 3,4, dated 18 February 1905; al-Hakam, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 2,3, dated 24 February 1905, via Malfuzat-7, online English edition, pages 122-123).

In 1906, in Chashma Masihi, MGA denied the miracle of the snake of Musa (as) again.

In 1906-1907, MGA alleged that his son Mirza Mubarak Ahmad had died, MGA then placed his hand on Mirza Mubarak Ahmad’s body and focused my attention toward God Almighty [and] so after two or three minutes the boy started breathing and a pulse could be felt and the boy became alive. Then it occurred to me that the giving of life to the dead, by `Eesaa, peace on him, was of this same kind and then the ignorant embellished upon it (See “Haqiqatul Wahi”, online English edition, page 324, Sign-104)(Urdu, RK, v. 22, p. 265). MGA also scoffed at snakes turning into rods and vice and versa (see page 355 of “Haqiqatul Wahi”, online English edition).

In 1908, (April-May), in Chashma-e-Marifat, MGA and his team of writers wrote that Maryam (as) had both male and female “characteristics” and was thus able to impregnant herself via male sperm if she ever got excited (See the Hermaphrodite theory). They were arguing that Hindu’s shouldn’t object to the miraculous birth since strange stories of births exist in Hindu literature.

In 1908 (Mar-2), MGA and his team of writers argued that there is the issue of creating birds by Jesus. I do not deny miracles, rather I believe in them. The miracle of creation of birds by Jesus as is very much akin to the incident of the staff of Moses (as). Despite the fact that it became a snake at the time of the confrontation with the enemies, yet at other times it had remained the same staff that it ever was and had not gone and mingled with some colony of snakes afterwards. Similarly, the birds of Jesus were, in the end, just of clay. In fact, the staff of Moses is far superior than the birds of Jesus as because it had to face the challenge and showed its supremacy in that challenge whereas those birds did not compete with anything nor was their supremacy ever proven (See Al-Hakam, vol. 12, no. 16, p. 4–6, dated 2 March 1908, via Malfuzat-10, page 175).

In 1908 (Apr), MGA and his team of writers argued that the miracle of Moses as in converting his staff into a snake, is far greater than raising the dead (See Al-Hakam, vol. 12, no. 26, p. 1–4, dated 10 April 1908, via Malfuzat-10, page 270).

In 1908 (Oct), via BA5, MGA and his team of writers called the splitting of the moon as a type of lunar eclipse (see pages 106-107).

In 1917, Maulvi Muhammad Ali totally denied all the miracles of Solomon in his English commentary of the Quran. Finally, this story started from the Torah (see Proverbs), the Quran simply confirmed it like it confirmed the physical ascension of Idris (as) aka Enoch. Just like it confirmed that Esa (as) flew up to heaven and sat down at the right hand of God.

In the 1960’s, via Tafseer-e-Kabeer, Mirza Basheer ud din Mahmud Ahmad argued that “the ants” was a name of a human tribe, that the ant mentioned was their queen.

In 1988, via the Qadiani Quranic commentary of Malik Ghulam Farid, See under 19:22 (19:23 in the Kadiani Koran). And 3:47 (3:48 in the Kadiani Koran). They alleged that tumors can cause the creation of Male sperm through a process called arrhenblastoma. This argument was repeated in the online edition of 2025.

In 1996 (Sep-4), in a QNA session, Mirza Tahir Ahmad was asked about Musa’s (as) splitting of the sea and the Red Drops miracle of MGA. Mirza Tahir Ahmad suggested that it might have been an earthquake, he said “some scholars”. Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that the water was spread out and not able to drown Musa (as) and his people. However, there was an explosion in the Mediterranean Sea which caused a tidal wave which helped appeared like the sea had been split. Mirza Tahir Ahmad also suggested that the Nile river was flooded too. Mirza Tahir Ahmad said that the scientific explanation of what happened doesn’t take away from the Mojiza. Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleged that the red drops miracle is something that happens rarely and it is a sign of truth for the believers, not the non-believers. Mirza Tahir Ahmad even called it a freak of nature, these are never presented to the unbelievers. Mirza Tahir Ahmad said that the miracles of Eisa (as) were pointless, since it barely converted at the most 30 people (naozobillah). At the very end, Mirza Tahir Ahmad calls some miracles as “freak of nature” and they are in “apparent” breach of the laws of nature.

In the 2018, 5-volume Official Commentary of the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid, it is argued that this verse does not mean the valley of ants as is generally misunderstood but the valley where a tribe named Naml lived. In Qamus under the word برق we have الابرقة من میاہ النملة i.e. Abriqah is one of the springs of Namlah. So Naml is the name of a tribe just as Mazin ( مازن ) which means the eggs of ants is the name of an Arab tribe. In Arabia it was not an uncommon practice that tribes were named after animals and beasts such as Banu Asad, Banu Taghlab, Banu Kalb, Banu Naml, etc. Moreover, the use of the words ادخلوا (enter) and مساکنکم (your habitations) in the verse lends powerful support to the view that Naml was a tribe, since the former word is used only for rational beings and the expression مساکنکم (your habitations) has been used in the Quran exclusively for human habitations (29:39; 32:27). Thus نملة means a person of the tribe of النمل ; a Namlite. The said Namlite was possibly their leader and had ordered the people to get out of the way of the army of Solomon and enter their houses.

Continue reading “Ahmadiyya and miracles, everything you need to know” →

Intro
I bumped into someone on social media today and told me that I should file a privacy claim with OIPC vs. the Ahmadiyya Movement in the USA. OIPC is an organization that governs personal information and privacy in Canada. Through their services, you can get all information, emails or documents even mentioning your name or talking about you from any organization. All you have to do is send the Cult a request first. If they don’t comply within 30 business days you can forward the complaint to the OIPC and they will legally make the Jamaat comply.

It’s called a section 23 request. You have the right to any and all personal information they hold on you, have used of yours for decision making, for profiling etc. A section 24 request is where you dispute the information and they have to correct it. If they don’t correct it they have to annotate it permanently stating that it has been disputed with such and such. Even in America and the UK you can make requests for your information that they have. In Canada BC it’s the OIPC that governs this, rest of Canada a different organization, UK it’s ICO. So for example Mirza Nabeel Baig has filed a lawsuit and is asking for his information that they used and the judgments they made against him, he can make a request to the OIPC for this information. Eventually the Jamaat will get issued a court order to comply with the privacy and personal information rights and this will be made public by the government. See the AMJI global policy on privacy herein.

Continue reading “How do I file a privacy claim against the Ahmadiyya Movement via OIPC?” →