Intro
The Mirza family are a group of sick people. MGA’s son, the famous Musleh Maud preyed on boys and girls. The British Government allowed him to do whatever he wanted. A few years ago, Fauzia Faizi did an interview wherein she described the inner workings of the Mirza family, Samina Khan, a German politician also weighed in. Fauzia Faizi also discussed how Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad was raping his own daughter and etc. Fauzia Faizi is the great grand daughter of a companion of MGA, Dr. Syed Abdus Sattar Shah. She is also the niece of Abd u Rehman Khadim (Author of Ahmadiyya Pocket Book). In 2021, a great-great grand-daughter of MGA accused the 5th Khalifa and his gang of admin as sexual predators and rapists.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________The family of Fauzia Faizi Continue reading “Fauzia Faizi confirms that the Mirza family is full of incest and rapists”
Intro
Dr. Salam (29 January 1926 – 21 November 1996) had allegiance to Ahmadiyya, he respected the religion of his father, he thus never challenged anything in Ahmadiyya, he also believed that his intelligence was based on a revelation of MGA (see Tajalliyyat-e-Ilahiyyah, pages 20-21), in fact, in 1979 at the Jalsa in Rabwah, Salam claimed that it was the prayers of MGA which helped him become a Nobel winner. His contributions to the 1979 Nobel Prize award seem to be plagiarized and a result of schmoozing. In fact, Sheldon Glashow (with whom Dr. Salam won the Nobel Prize with) directly accused of Dr. Salam of having no contribution. Interestingly, Salam never attempted to solve the scientific irregularities of the Ahmadiyya religion, like Yus Asaf and the eclipses.
Dr. Abdus Salam was a particle-physicist, which is the closest branch to Nuclear Physics (he explains it himself herein). Born in 1926, he was always a gifted student, there are many stories, he received his MA in Mathematics from the Government College University in 1946. That same year, he was awarded a scholarship (that was supposed to be given to the sons of poor farmers) to St John’s College, Cambridge the UK, where he completed a BA degree with Double First-Class Honours in Mathematics and Physics in 1949.
He then returned to Pakistan and began lecturing at the Government College and Punjab University, Lahore (1951- 1953). After the Ahmadiyya riots of 1953, Dr. Salam hated Pakistan, turned his back on Pakistan and left for Europe. Just a year later, he was hired by the United Nations, he was already schmoozing with the nuclear energy establishment via NATO. He was working as the Scientific Secretary, Geneva Conferences on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy in 1955 and 1958. This led Salam to be a Member, Atomic Energy Commission, Pakistan (1958-1974) by President Ayub Khan. In 1958, Dr. Abdus Salam met Sigvard Arne Eklund at the 2nd annual “Geneva Conferences on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy”, they made fast friends. In 1961, Sigvard Arne Eklund was named the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, a post that he held until 1981. This connection between Dr. Salam and Sigvard Arne Eklund proved fruitful for Salam, he was able to secure the funding needed for this ICTP in 1964. He worked with Ishrat Hussain Usmani. Salam and Usmani seem to have had a nuclear reactor built in Pakistan by the Canadian Government. Some other great Pakistani physicist’s were Nazir Ahmed, Ishfaq Ahmad Khan, Iqbal Hussain Qureshi and Abdul Qadeer Khan.
In 1962, Salam met a very young Physics student, Louise Dame Napier Johnson. Attending an antinuclear proliferation meeting in London in 1962, Salam had met Louise Johnson, then a physics undergraduate at University College London (UCL), who was helping with the meeting’s
administration. It was what the French call un coup de foudre, an emotional lightning strike, such as Salam had not experienced since seeing the inaccessible Urmilla at Government College, Lahore, some twenty years before. Louise was only 20 years old, and Salam was 36. It should be noted that Ahmadiyya literature never mentions his second wife (girlfriend) and those circumstances (see the Al-Nahl of 1997, which has 200+ pages of data on Dr. Salam, however, they barely mention his second wife and those 2 amazing kids, see page 200, it is nevertheless from a Pakistani newspaper). Dr. Dame Louise Napier Johnson was never his wife, instead a life-long girlfriend. Allegedly, a few years later, he had an ahmadi-mullah read the Nikkah. His son was born in 1974 (Umar) and a daughter was born in 1982 (Saeeda). Both of these children are shunned by the Ahmadiyya Movement.
In 1964, with funding from the United Nations, Dr. Abdus Salam opened the ICTP. Recently, Qaiser Raja did a really expose’ of Dr. Abdus Salam and his shenanigans via Paul Dombey. In terms of being a schmoozer, Dr. Abdus Salam used ICTP’s fund to woo members of the Nobel Prize committee, like Paul Dirac and Waller, with all expense paid trips to Trieste. In fact, Waller visited every single summer for about 10 years, all expenses paid. Paul Dirac even had his birthday celebrated therein (1972) via huge parties wherein most likely alcohol was consumed and food was thrown around lavishly. In fact, the entire idea of the ICTP seems to be a scam to steal scientist from developing countries and use them in the West accordingly. But why were they wasting money on such lavishness? Nevertheless, it worked out for Dr. Abdus Salam, he used the ICTP to fraternize with other famous physicists like Werner Heisenberg, Eugene Paul Wigner, Hans Albrecht Bethe, Hendrik Casimir and Rudolf Peierls. Dr. Abdus Salam also revealed that by the mid 1980’s, the USA, UK and others (NATO) were against the ICTP.
From 1971 until 1978, Paul Dirac nominated Dr. Abdus Salam for the Nobel Prize on various accounts. In 1976, Erik Wilhelm Hulthén became the head of the Nobel Prize Committee and Salam devised a scheme that most likely land him the Nobel Prize. Dr. Salam even jokingly prayed to God for success in his diabolical scheme. Frank Close even tells a stories wherein Dr. Salam was dying to be associated with Weinberg and his theories. Yet again, in 1978, Paul Dirac wrote a letter of Recommendation and nominated Dr. Abdus Salam to win a Nobel Prize.
Nevertheless, per the order of his Khalifa, he worked for Pakistan and Italy simultaneously and as an esteemed College Professor at Cambridge. However, after Ahmadi’s were declared Non-Muslim in 1974, he left his job with the Pakistani government and began to focus on his school of Physics in Trieste, Italy. Oct 1974 to late 1978 seems to be a dead era in his career.
In 1979, he won the Nobel Prize in Physics. In 1979, the President of Pakistan and head military dictator, Zia ul Haq invited Dr. Salaam to Pakistan and gave him full presidential treatment, they asked him to build a center of Physics, he was wined and dined, nevertheless, he still left Pakistan in 1980 and continued to work for Italy.
In 1990, via the Muslim Sunrise of the 3rd Quarter, a speech of Dr. Abdus Salam from 1984 is reproduced. This was a speech allegedly given by Dr. Abdus Salam in Paris, France, in a meeting wherein “Islam and the West” was being discussed, at the UNESCO house on April-27-1984. In this speech, Dr. Abdus Salam quoted 88:17 of the Quran, however, it seems to be portions of 88:17 to 88:20. Dr. Abdus Salam also quoted 3:188 (3:189 in the Kadiani Koran) and portions of 3:189 (3:190 in the Kadiani Koran). Dr. Abdus Salam argued that Muslims scientist had already discovered much of what the Europeans had recently discovered. Dr. Salam quoted Ibn Khaldun, Al-Biruni, Ibn-i-Sina, Ibn-al-Haitham, Ibn Rushd, and connected Al-Ghazzali to the decline in Islamic sciences. He even quoted Chapter 2:1-3 of the Quran. Dr. Salam mentioned Einstein as the greatest physicist of all time and Heisenberg, he also mentioned Galileo.
Eventually, he died in 1996 of a rare brain disease wherein he had become a mute and at the house of his 2nd wife. Polygamy in the UK was illegal, hence, his second wife, Dr. Johnson was more like a lifelong girlfriend in British law. Abdus Salaam’s son, Ahmad Salaam, recently gave an interview herein wherein he discusses his father.
Continue reading “Dr. Abdus Salam liked white women, alcohol and a busy British lifestyle”
Intro
In 2026 (Apr), Maulvi Razi claims that Muhammad (Saw) disobeyed Allah when he prayed for Abdallah Ibn Ubayy (a munafiq)(naozobillah)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). However, this is not the case. In Quran 9:80-9:84, Allah offers him a choice and the prophet avails it. The prophet (saw) prays the hypocrite’s janaza, and AFTER that the prohibition verse was revealed. After the revelation (9:84) he never prayed for a hypocrite again (See Tafsir ibn Kathir, page 490). They lie upon rasoolAllah (saw) to dig Mirza out of the hole. Muhammad (saw) never disobeyed Allah. See the Qadiani-Ahmadi commentary on 9:84.
Intro
Sheikh Asrar Rashid has commented on the recent debate (#qadianismontrial)(39:55 time stamp). Sheikh Asrar Ahmad explained how met Bro Imtiaz in the UK and how the Qadiani’s kept throwing red herrings in this debate.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
https://www.youtube.com/live/XDlVydyRWOg?si=JGZCApq364HZeTXa
(3) Asrar Rashid – Official – YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/c/AsrarRashidOfficial
Asrar Rashid Official (@ShAsrarRashid) / X
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #qadianismontrial
Intro
In the recent debate (#qadianismontrial)(1:56:20 and 1:56:50), as part of his opening statement and in an attempt to reject all the references wherein MGA was called the Final prophet, last Adam, last Mahdi, final messiah, takfir was done vs. Muslims, Maulvi Razi denied the Al-Fazl newspaper (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). However, it should be noted that Mirza Nasir Ahmad did the same in 1974 at the National Assembly, MGA also denied that Al-Hakam was an official newspaper in 1899. In 1954, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa also denied the Al-Fazl. Thus, this is normal Qadiani behavior.
Intro
@UmarElhashmi watched the recent debate with the Qadiani’s and has given his comments herein. Umar El Hashmi pointed out mistakes in reading the Quran by Ibrahim Ikhlaf, he mis-pronounced 49:14 of the Quran, specifically, the verse says, “Yud Khu Lil”, however, Ikhlaf mispronounces it as “Yud Khee Lul” (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter and on the Twitter account of @UmarElhashmi). @UmarElhashmi also pointed out how Maulvi Raheel called the famous Musaylima and “Musaylima bin Khattab”, which is totally incorrect.
@UmarElhashmi also pointed out how Maulvi Raheel said “ba ta loo” instead of “ba ta la” (See the clip on Twitter). Maulvi Raheel wasn’t reading from the Quran or hadith, however, he seems to be reading a Legal Maxim in Fiqh. In summary: Every verb in Arabic, on a beginner level, has 3 root letters and must follow the verb form: 1. Fa ‘a la 2. Fa ‘u la 3. Fa ‘i la There is no such thing as: Fa ‘a loo So apply now the letters: baa taa and laam to the scale and you get: Ba ta la You can NEVER get: Ba Ta Loo And that is so long as it’s a verb, which is the case in that principle he tried to sound smart when quoting: إذا جاء الاحتمال، بَطَلَ الاستدلال Izaa jaa-al-ihtimaal, ba ta la-l-istidlaal. It can NEVER be ‘ba ta loo’ Ever. So when he says ba ta loo… it’s a huge facepalm moment, just like their “al-qawl al-sahaabi” which I called out in my YouTube video under the video sections “exposing their ignorance of Arabic” — as well as their saying “alif-laam istishraaqiyyah” and only realizing that’s wrong by reading it on screen— exposed that and called it out.
Continue reading “@UmarElhashmi comments on the debate with the #Qadianis”
Intro
In the recent debate and in defense of MGA changing his position (tabdili-aqidah) on the alleged death of Eisa (as), Maulvi Razi alleged that Muhammad (Saw) denied the punishment of the grave (See 23:100, 23:101 in the Kadiani Koran)(azab-e-kabir)(also called barzakh), then changed later (See the clip on twitter). This is not true. There is no evidence of him denying it at any point. In fact, the opposite is true! He (saw) affirmed it from the very first time the matter was raised.
Intro
29 April 2026 was a very important day for me. On the surface, it was the day of a significant first face-to-face meeting with the official team and missionaries of the Mirzai (Ahmadi) group in London (written by Suhail Bawa, son of Abdul Rahman Bawa Sahib). However, behind this, there were several incidents that occurred which clarified many things. These were moments that remained hidden from the camera’s eye, but in the mirror of reality, they carry great significance. Another significant incident occurred when, at the beginning of the discussion, Mr. Imtiaz extended his hand for a handshake to Razi and Raheel and Ibrahim Ikhlaf, but they refused, saying: “We cannot shake hands with you.” This incident effectively exposed the slogan of the Mirzai group, “Love for all, hatred for none” (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter).
This incident was later mentioned by Mr. Imtiaz on-air as well, which should serve as a point of reflection for ordinary Ahmadis too.
Firstly, when a former Qadiani, Abu Bakr, was present with me, an unusual reaction was observed from the opposing side. As soon as they saw him, they became visibly upset and formally imposed the condition that those who had left the Qadiani community would not be allowed to enter the room where the dialogue was taking place. This behaviour itself raises many questions.
During a break, colleagues from Khatm-e-Nubuwwat, Mr. Adnan Rashid and Mr. Imtiaz, called me inside twice to keep me informed about the situation. It was during this time that I had my first encounter with individuals from the Mirzai group, Raziullah and Raheel. In a sarcastic tone, they said, “Are these Imtiaz and Adnan Rashid your representatives?”
I immediately replied: “They are not just our representatives, but representatives of the entire Muslim world.”
To this, they further remarked, “Today they did not defend your كبار (elders/scholars); it seems you did not prepare them.”
I responded clearly:
“I have complete trust in them. There is no answer you have to the points they have raised. And as far as preparation is concerned, they have the help and support of Allah; they do not need any other backing.”
Furthermore, the conduct of the opposing side the previous night exposed another reality. Their outward appearance was one thing, while their inner reality was something else. In front of the public, they presented a soft and courteous face, but behind closed doors, their behaviour was entirely different. This contradiction made the reality of their claims and stance quite clear.
All these events reflect that the real truth is not limited to what happens on stage; rather, the conduct and behaviour behind the scenes also reveal a great deal.
Intro
In 2026, these are the conditions of the roads in Rabwah aka Chenab Nagar. Clearly, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s don’t spend money on their roads.
Continue reading “Road conditions in Rabwah are terrible in 2026”
Intro
Ahmadi’s forget that MGA made this announcement.
Majmua’i-e-Ishtharat Vol. I, pp. 157-159
“Be it clear to the evil-minded that in order to judge our truthfulness or falsehood there can be no greater touchstone of test than our predictions”.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said that to judge his truthfullness by his prophecies”