Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Abdul Rahman Bawa’s contribution vs. #Qadianism

Intro
Abdul Rahman Bawa is roughly 80 years old in 2025. He has done some amazing work vs. Qadianism, check out his youtube channel herein.

In the early 1990’s, Abdul Rahman Bawa was in Mali and converted 30,000 new Qadiani-Ahmadi’s back to Islam after they had unknowingly converted. He also had a famous debate in 1993 with Ahmadi’s in the UK.

His son is Sohail Ahmad Bawa, who recently collaborated with Adnan Rashid.

In 2026 (Jun), Abdul Rahman Bawa passed away. Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi raji’un (Indeed, to Allah we belong and to Him we shall return).

Continue reading “Abdul Rahman Bawa’s contribution vs. #Qadianism”

Featured post

Sheikh Asrar Rashid proves Ahmadiyya as a bunch of liars vs. Maulvi Razi, the 2nd London Debate

Intro
In 2026 (Jun), Sheikh Asrar Rashid proved to the world that Ahmadi’s are a bunch of liars in his debate with Maulvi Razi and company. Check out post-debate analysis herein and herein. I have posted many links to TikToks in the below.

Continue reading “Sheikh Asrar Rashid proves Ahmadiyya as a bunch of liars vs. Maulvi Razi, the 2nd London Debate”

Ahmadi’s believe that some of the sahaba will go to hell (naozobillah)

Intro
Ahmadi’s believe that some of the sahaba will go to Hell, we have seen this in our online discussions with them. However, this is not true, in fact, all the sahaba mentioned in hadith will all go to heaven, no doubt. However, there are some who rude bedouin men who acted against the Khilafat of the first 4 and thereafter, for this, they will have to face Allah. That is most likely what this famous hadith means, Allah knows best! This Hadeeth was also reported by Muslim, Ahmad, Abu Daawood, At-Tirmithi, Ibn Maajah and An-Nasaa’i with different wordings. The opinion of MGA and his sons are unknown as of yet.

The scholars elaborated on the above Hadeeth and similar Ahaadeeth, and some of them understood it to mean apostasy. For instance Ibn Al-Jawzi said in his book Kashf Al-Mushkil Min Ahaadeeth As-Saheehayn, “It appears that some became hypocrites in the era of the Prophet, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, and some became non-Muslims after he died. Abu Bakr ibn Muqsim said, ‘They – and Allaah knows best – are those who came to him from tribe of Bani Haneefah and he saw them and knew them but afterwards they apostatized with Musaylimah and died as non-Muslims, but none of the Companions of the Prophet  died as a non-Muslim.’” Besides, Ibn Hajar  said, “Al-Farbari said, ‘It was said that Abu ‘Abdullaah Al-Bukhari quoted Qabeesah as saying, ‘They are those who apostatized during the era of Abu Bakr and Abu Bakr fought against them'”, meaning until they were killed and died as non-Muslims.

Ibn Hajar also quoted Al-Khattaabi as saying, “None of the Companions apostatized; rather, those who apostatized were a group from the rude Bedouins who did not support the religion and this does not necessitate degrading the famous Companions. What proves this is that the Prophet, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, said what means that those Companions were small in numbers.”

Some other scholars understood this Hadeeth to refer to some disobedient persons among the Companions . Al-‘Ayni said, “The statement of the Prophet, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam: “… what they innovated (in religion) after you were gone…” means the acts of disobedience committed by some Companions that necessitate preventing (them) from drinking from the Prophet’s Hawdh.”

In the narration of Abu Sa’eed Al-Khudri the following addition was reported: “…I would say: “They are from me.” It will be said, “You do not know what they innovated (in religion) after you were gone.” Then I would say: “Away with them, away with them for those who changed (in religion) after I was gone.”

Continue reading “Ahmadi’s believe that some of the sahaba will go to hell (naozobillah)”

Does CAIR know that Raaheela Ahmed hates Islam and Muslims?

Intro
In a strange political twist, I noticed a CAIR sticker on Raheela Ahmed’s marketing campaign, is this a fake? Nevertheless, Raheela Ahmed is a cult member and her allegiances are with Mirza Masroor Ahmad as her Khalifa. In fact, through this connection she believes that Muslims in Palestine are being punished for simply rejecting Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a prophet. In reality, Raheela Ahmed and her family (Shukoor Ahmed) are enemies of Islam and have hated Muslims for over 40 years.

Continue reading “Does CAIR know that Raaheela Ahmed hates Islam and Muslims?”

In Indonesia, Ahmadiyya Ijtema gets shut down by police (June-2026)

Intro
Ahmadiyya sources (MTA) are reporting how an Ahmadiyya Ijtema was shut down by the police in Indonesia. Soon after prayers, there seem to be some Muslim protestors who showed and caused a disturbance. Soon thereafter, the local police showed up and the Ahmadiyya people were told to go home.

The Sadr of MKA-Indonesia is a man named Muhammad Anahdi Sholihin. he complained about equal rights.

Continue reading “In Indonesia, Ahmadiyya Ijtema gets shut down by police (June-2026)”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the famous hadith of “La Nabiya Baadi” (No Prophet After Me)

Intro
This is an essay wherein I have collected all the utterances of MGA in terms of the famous hadith “La Nabiyya Badi”.

In 1893, MGA alleged that “La Nabiya Badi” was the commentary for 33:40 of the Quran (See Hamamatul Bushra, via Maulvi Muhammad Ali, Prophethood in Islam, 1915).

In 1898, via “Kitab-al-Bariyya” (see page 32, online English abridged edition), MGA argued that the famous hadith of “La Nabiya Baadi” (No Prophet After Me) was so well-known that no
one had any doubt regarding its authenticity. And the Holy Quran, every single word of which is absolute, in its noble verse “he is the Messenger of Allah and the Kha¯tam an-nabiyyı¯n”, had also confirmed that prophethood has, in fact, ended with our Holy Prophet. Then how could it be possible that any prophet should come after the Holy Prophet Muhammad, according to
the real meaning of prophethood? This would have destroyed the entire fabric of Islam. MGA also argued that in Hadith, had settled the matter that no prophet can come after the Holy Prophet (Saw), in terms of the real meaning of prophethood.

In 1898, via Ayyam-e-Sulh, page 47, Via Prophethood in Islam, MGA and his team argued that the famous hadith of “La Nabiyya Badi” stops Eisa (As) from physically descending to Earth. MGA also argued that “La Nabiyya Badi” stops the phenomenon of the “independent-prophets”.

In 1901 (Nov), MGA quoted the famous hadiths wherein “La Nabiya Badi” is mentioned (See page 3, “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala”), MGA did this right after quoting 33:40 (33:41 in the Kadiani Koran), MGA was arguing that it is sinful to believe that Eisa (as) will physically return as the same prophet and was using this hadith as evidence.

In 1947, A.R. Dard argued that “La Nabiyya Badi” means, “No prophet with him” (See “Life of Ahmad” by Dard, page 839). Dard also argued that via Ibn Arabi, that there shall be no Prophet who will cancel or go against the Islamic law of Muhammad (Saw).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the famous hadith of “La Nabiya Baadi” (No Prophet After Me)”

Captain Mohammed Amine Erraqui EXPOSED as a traitor to the Islamic government of Morocco

Intro
In 2026, a man named Captain Mohammed Amine Erraqui alleged that he converted to Ahmadiyya while in the Moroccan military and was arrested and eventually got asylum in the UK and a job as “waqfe zindagi”. Ahmadiyya sources allege that there are 800 Ahmadi’s in the country in 2026. Ahmadiyya sources allege that these 800 people accepted Ahmadiyya after watching MTA. Mr. Elkhamsi Issam explains how Ahmadiyya is banned in Morocco, especially Ahmadiyya tabligh. Captain Amine Erraqui is so stupid, he fabricates a dream about seeing MGA sitting on a chair and being carried in his younger days in Mecca while performing Umrah. In this dream, someone told him it was Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah)(however, it was MGA). However, Captain Amine Erraqui says that he knew it wasn’t Muhammad (Saw) in the dream. Ibrahim Ikhlaf was in the video too. Captain Amine Erraqui says he met an Ahmadi who was serving in the Morrocan military and he converted him to Ahmadiyya via the poetry of MGA, not a proper study. After Captain Amine Erraqui and 2 other military officers converted to Ahmadiyya, the local police began investigating them. Captain Amine Erraqui alleges that his turning point was in 2010 after he heard about the Lahore attacks and he was impressed, this caused him to join Ahmadiyya. Interestingly, Captain Amine Erraqui said that he heard that if someone doesn’t pay chanda for 6 months, they will be kicked out of Ahmadiyya. Captain Amine Erraqui related many fabricated dreams that he had wherein he alleges to have seen famous Ahmadi Khulafa. One of the military guys admits to being Ahmadi and is taken to jail. Ahmadiyya sources allege that the colonel who was supposed to investigate this Ahmadi had died in a car crash. Captain Amine Erraqui and the guy arrested with him keep alleging to see more dreams. They allege to have seen the same dreams. The prosecutor sentenced Amine and his buddy to jail for breaking the military code. Amine says that he was thrown in jail for 2 years. The other prisoner had a wife who would send them reports of the 5th Khalifa while in jail. It’s unclear if this woman was born an Ahmadi or not. His sister also seems to have converted to Ahmadiyya, it’s unclear. The King of Morroco issues a pardon. He got an asylum visa and moved to the UK. However, he was discouraged to meet the Khalifa and gets upset, this was rectified soon thereafter and he met the Khalifa. Mirza Masroor Ahmad allowed Captain Amine to live in Tilford and even arranged for him to get married to Amatul Naseer. In 2017 (Dec), he became an official employee (Waqf-e-Zindagi) of the Ahmadiyya Movement.

 

Continue reading “Captain Mohammed Amine Erraqui EXPOSED as a traitor to the Islamic government of Morocco”

Raaheela Ahmed of Bowie, Maryland vs. Ron Watson and Maryland Senate Democrats

Intro
Raaheela Ahmed of Bowie, Maryland is a Qadiani-Ahmadi woman and aspiring politician. Her father (Shukoor Ahmed) is also a professional politician.

Raaheela Ahmed is trying to get elected in the Democratic primary for the Maryland State Senate, in the 23rd Legislative District. It seems that Ron Watson and Maryland Senate Democrats have exposed Raaheela Ahmed as someone who bought local properties at a tax sale and thus accelerated the foreclosures of many homes. This has upset Raaheela Ahmed and her supporters and she has hired a law firm to sue for libel. In the paperwork, the lawyers of Raaheela Ahmed alleged that all of these properties were returned to their owner, however, this makes it even more fishy, was this Ahmadi’s in Joppatown that she did favors for?

Ironically, Shukoor Ahmed supported Ron Watson in both 2014 and 2018 primaries because Shukoor believed he deserved the opportunity to serve (a lie).

Mansoor Shams is also running in the State of Maryland. We are monitoring all of these nerds.


Continue reading “Raaheela Ahmed of Bowie, Maryland vs. Ron Watson and Maryland Senate Democrats”

Shaykh Asrar Rashid vs. Maulvi Razi, Sunday, 6-21-26, 4pm UK Time

Intro
This Sunday, 4pm UK time, Shaykh Asrar Rashid will debate Maulvi Razi on 6-21-26, it will be live streamed on Shaykh Asrar Rashid’s youtube channel. The topic of the debate is, “Is Eisa (As) alive in heaven with his earthly body”? This must be according to the Quran, Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim.

Continue reading “Shaykh Asrar Rashid vs. Maulvi Razi, Sunday, 6-21-26, 4pm UK Time”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said that NON-law bearing prophets can’t come after him (1902), (via 108:3, 108:4 in the Kadiani Koran)

Intro
In 1902, via “A Review of the Debate between Batalavi and Chakrhalavi” (see page 14), MGA argued that independent Prophethood, even of a non-law-bearing kind, has also come to an end (via 108:3, 108:4 in the Kadiani Koran). MGA then says that only one prophethood remains, however, MGA makes a vague statement, which supports both Lahori and Qadiani positions. MGA said that only prophethood which remains is that wherein someone gets light from the lamp of Muhammad (Saw). In 2026, Azim Saifi used this source in the Urdu, which would be RK-19, page 213 (1:30:55 time stamp).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said that NON-law bearing prophets can’t come after him (1902), (via 108:3, 108:4 in the Kadiani Koran)”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑