Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

H.E. Nabeel Munir is a Qadiani-Ahmadi and the Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to the Republic of Korea

Intro
We have come to know that there is a Qadiani-Ahmadi getting favor from the current regime in Pakistan and working as the Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to the Republic of Korea (South Korea), his name is H.E. Nabeel Munir (See KTV news also). H.E. Nabeel Munir seems to be living in South Korea and helping the Qadiani-Ahmadi develop a mission house and community therein. H.E. Nabeel Munir has been quietly doing Qadiani-Ahmadi tabligh in South Korea and has immersed himself in the local Pakistani community, while lying about his religion.

H.E. Nabeel Munir was born in 1969 and joined the Foreign Service of Pakistan in 1993. His career in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has included serving as Assistant Director (1995- 1997), Deputy Director (2000- 2003), Director (2009- 2011), Director General (2019- 2020), and Additional Secretary (2020- 2022). He also served as a Director in the President’s Secretariat in 2011. He is also on the Pakistan government website and his accolades are listed as such:

Held diplomatic assignments at Pakistan Missions abroad:

South Africa (1997- 2000)

Belgium (2003- 2006)

Kenya (2006- 2009)

Deputy Permanent Representative, Pakistan’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations in New York (2012- 2019)

Currently serving as Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to the Republic of Korea since March 2022

He is married with two children.

In 2026, Nabeel Munir on being bestowed Sitaria Imtiaz by the President of Pakistan. He was posted at the Pakistan Mission to the United Nations many years ago.

Continue reading “H.E. Nabeel Munir is a Qadiani-Ahmadi and the Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to the Republic of Korea”

Featured post

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Matthew 27:46 when the Biblical Jesus said “my god my god..”, MGA said Eisa (as) was supposed to die an accursed death

Intro
Firstly, Muslims don’t accept Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 (“”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“) as an authentic source, thus, this prayer and entire scenario was always disregarded by Muslims.

In 2026 (Jun), Bro Imtiaz streamed on TikTok with Amir Haq and explained how MGA alleged that Allah had decreed an accursed death for Eisa (as)(naozobillah), however, after Eisa (as) prayed (Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 (“”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“), Allah changed his decree and Eisa (as)(See 3:47:14 time stamp)(Via Malfuzat-5-Urdu, page 238)(dated as Aug-23-1903) was allowed to survive the crucifixion.

In 1882-1884, via “Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya” (See page 206 online English edition), MGA was criticizing Christianity and alleged that per the Gospel, the night before Eisa (as) was arrested, he kept repeating a certain prayer over and over again and hoping to avert his death (See Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34), however, this prayer was not accepted. MGA also calls the method of birth for an alleged God to be disrespectful, since the Christian God seems to have been a fetus and delivered through the birth channel (and somehow this is disrespectful for a God)(See BA-4, RK-1, page 441-Urdu)(See Bro Imtiaz, 3:51:19 time stamp). MGA also alleged to have received a revelation in Hebrew (“”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“)(See [Barahin-e-Ahmadiyyah, part 4, pp. 555–556 sub-footnote 4, RK, v1, pp. 662–664 sub-footnote 4–Urdu, See page 433, online English edition).

In 1890-1891, MGA argued that the prayer (Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“) of Jesus of the Bible was not heard—for it was irrevocably destined not be heard, and what power would a poor creature have before the definite will of the Creator!—still, upon the hope that it might be accepted, the Messiah (as) took the admission of his humility and submission to the extreme. If he had indeed known beforehand that his prayer would be rejected and would never be heard, would he have gone on praying all night till dawn? And would he still have fervently employed himself and his disciples in this vain exercise? Here the critic would agree that Jesusas was sure that only God knew and he knew not. Likewise, the reason why so many of Jesus’as prophecies turned out to be false was his ignorance of matters of the unseen, which caused him to misunderstand and misinterpret Divine prophecies (See “Three Questions by a Christian and their Answers”, pages 43-44, 64 and 10).

In 1893 (via Tohfa Baghdad, page 91), MGA alleged to have received a revelation “”O my Lord,
my Lord, why have You forsaken me?”” aka “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani””.

In 1894 (via Nur ul Haq, page 75), MGA indirectly quotes (Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“) and alleged that the Christian God was a ridiculous invention, MGA then mentioned how Jesus of the Bible died while saying, ‘My God! My God! Why have you forsaken me?’ Yet in spite of all this, he is a god and the son of God?

In 1895, MGA quoted Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 and alleged that Jesus of the Bible departed from this world in utter hopelessness, crying لما سبقتانی [lama sabachthani—why
have You forsaken me?] Even the Hindu god Ramchandra fared better than this ‘God’; he was able to take revenge against Ravan while still alive and did not stop until he had killed him. MGA criticized the God of Christians and opined, Was it an act of Divinity that he bawled his eyes out
for the whole night, yet his prayer went unanswered? He gave up the ghost crying Eli, Eli [my God, my God but the Father took no pity on him (See pages 51, 62, 109-110).

In 1900 (Apr-17), MGA argued that how can the Christians, who deify a humble, weak, powerless unsuccessful man, give anyone success? What fruits can a man give to others who pray, when his own night-long prayers were useless and in vain? How can a man who says: ‘Eloi, eloi, lama sabachthani,’ meaning, ‘O God! O God! Why hast thou forsaken me?’ and admits that God has abandoned him, join others with God? (See Al-Hakam, vol. 4, no. 14, dated 17 April 1900, pp. 2-9, via Malfuzat-2, online English edition, page 216).

In 1900 (Aug-9), MGA argued that how can someone (Jesus of the Bible) who cries over his own helplessness grant power and honour to anyone else? How can such a one hear the supplications of others, when his own cries and lamentations made throughout the night went in vain? A person who cried and shrieked ‘Eloi, eloi, lama sabachthani,’ meaning, ‘O God! O God! Why hast thou forsaken me?’ yet he was not heard. And to crown this all off, ultimately, the Jews seized him and hung him on the cross, and in light of their own doctrine, established that he was accursed. Even the Christians themselves consider him to be accursed; their justification is that he took this curse upon himself for their sake (See Al-Hakam, vol. 4, no. 28, dated 9 August 1900, pp. 3-4, Via Malfuzat-2, online English edition, page 48).

In 1902 (Jul-24), MGA argued that if one observes the life of the Messiah it becomes clear that he spent the entire night praying himself and asked his friends to pray as well, but ultimately
began to complain and said: ‘Eloi, eloi, lama sabachthani,’ meaning, ‘O God! O God! Why hast thou forsaken me?’ Now who would look at this regretful state and say that he was commissioned by Allah? The image of Christ in his final state as put forth by the Christian priests consistently is one which causes utter despair. These people make such tall claims that may heaven preserve us, yet Christ did not really achieve anything. Over the span of his entire life all he managed to do was to prepare a community of 120 people, and even these people were so foolish and ignorant that they could not even understand matters relating to the kingdom of God (See Al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 26, dated 24 July 1902, pp. 5-12, via Malfuzat-2, online English edition, page 234).

In 1903 (Aug-23), MGA alleged that Allah had decreed an accursed death for Eisa (as)(naozobillah), however, after Eisa (as) prayed (Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 (“”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“), Allah changed his decree and Eisa (as)(Via Malfuzat-5-Urdu, page 238)(dated as Aug-23-1903) was allowed to survive the crucifixion (See Bro Imtiaz streamed on TikTok with Amir Haq, See 3:47:14 time stamp, Jun-2026).

In 1906 (Feb), MGA allegedly received a Hebrew revelation, “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani”” (See Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34) and alleged that this revelation makes MGA think that someone might plan some harm secretly, like women, the ultimate result of which would be acquittal; but this is only my considered judgment. Allah knows best what is actually meant by it. A man attacks openly. To attack anonymously or in secret is not manly but is characteristic of women. The last sentence means: We saved Bani Isra’il from the mischief of Pharaoh (See the al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 8, February 23, 1906, p. 2 and al-Hakam, vol. 10, no. 7, February 24, 1906, p. 1,
Via Tadhkirah).

In 1906 (Mar), MGA alleged to have received a revelation wherein his God said “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani”” (Hebrew, this is Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“)(See the Al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 12, p. 2, dated 22 March 1906, via Malfuzat-8, page 356, online English edition). MGA alleged From his ijtihad [interpretive judgement], I had understood this to mean that someone will plot secretly like women, which may lead to a case against me due to his deception, but in the end, I will be acquitted. But these are my interpreted meanings, and it is possible that what I saw before and what I saw now have another significance, but these are the apparent meanings. God knows.

In 1906, MGA quoted “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani”” (Hebrew, this is Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34) and argued that the God, to Whom Jesus had said, ‘Why hast Thou forsaken me?’, has not forsaken me. There have been many attacks on me, as there had been on the Messiah, but my enemies were frustrated in every one of them. A conspiracy was even hatched to have me executed, but, unlike the Messiah, I was not be crucified. Instead, my God saved me at the time of every trial, demonstrated great miracles for my sake, and helped me with His mighty hand. Through thousands of signs, He has proved to me that the True God is He Who revealed the Holy Quran and sent the Holy Prophet (saw). I do not at all consider Jesus to be superior to me in these matters. Just as the Word of God was revealed to him, so is it revealed to me; and just as he is said to have shown miracles, so have I been granted miracles, though in greater numbers. All this honour has been conferred upon me solely by virtue of being a follower of the Prophet whose spiritual station and high standing is largely hidden to the world, and he is none other than Muhammad, the Chosen Ones (See pages 25-26 and 53).

In 1906-1907, MGA quoted “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani”” (Hebrew, this is Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34) and argued that Yasu‘ the Messiah says in the Gospels, ‘If ye have faith even as much as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, move from here to there; and it shall move.’ But it seems that the entire prayer of Yasu‘ to spare his own life went to waste. Now Behold! What conclusion would be drawn about the faith of Yasu‘ according to the Gospels? It is not true at all that Yasu‘ prayed that he may well die on the cross, but it should be without distress. Was the prayer in the garden [of Gethsemane] meant only to spare him the distress? If this were the case, why did he raise the cry Eli Eli lama sabachtani when he was put on the cross? Does this utterance indicate that his distress had been removed at that moment? How far can a fabrication go? The prayer of Yasu‘ clearly has these words: ‘Let this cup pass from me.’ So God made that cup pass and created such circumstances as were sufficient to save his life; for example, the fact that he was not kept on the cross for up to six or seven days as was the norm, but was taken down within a short time, and that whereas the bones of others [crucified] were always broken, his bones were not broken. It is inconceivable that someone could die from such little torture (See Haqiqatul Wahi, Online English edition, page 53). On page 74, MGA argued that The assertion that the Messiah willingly accepted an accursed death is refuted by his passionate supplications in the garden that the cup [of death] be passed from him; and his lamentation when he was put on the cross: Eli Eli lama sabachtani, meaning: my God, my God, why have you forsaken me? If he was indeed content with that death on the cross why did he make supplications? And this notion that death of the Messiah on the cross was the
mercy of God on mankind and God was pleased to do this so that the world could find salvation through the blood of the Messiah, is rejected by the argument that if divine mercy was truly excited on that day then why was there a terrible earthquake which caused the veil of the Temple to be torn, and why was there such a severe sandstorm and the sun became dark? All this, indeed, shows that God was greatly displeased with the crucifixion of the Messiah
and this is why He chased the Jews for forty years and they suffered various calamities. First they died of a severe plague and at the end thousands of Jews were killed at the hands of Titus, the Roman. On page 75, There cannot be anything more absurd than to suggest that he willingly accepted death on the cross in order to redeem the sins of his people. The man who spent the entire night in tearful supplication in a garden to save his life—which was not even heard—and then he was so overwhelmed by panic that he cried out Eli Eli lama sabachtani at the time of the crucifixion. He addressed his God as God and forgot to call him ‘Father’ in that extreme anguish. Now, considering all this, can anyone believe that he died by his own volition? Who can understand the contradictions in Christian theology? On the one hand, they believe Yasu‘ to be God, while on the other, the same ‘God’ is seen praying and crying before another God. Whereas all three ‘Gods’ were inside Yasu‘ and he was the embodiment of them all, to whom did he tearfully supplicate? It appears from all this that there is another mighty God for Christians besides the Godheads of the Trinity, who is distinct from them and rules over them, before whom the three were obliged to supplicate.

In 1908 (May-18), This belief of those people that Jesus as did not engage in istighfar is false. This is their stupidity and ignorance, and they level a false allegation upon Jesus as. A study of the New Testament reveals that he repeatedly confessed to his weaknesses and even performed istighfar. What was meant by his cry ایلی اْیلی لما سبقتانی —Eli, Eli lama sabachthani?1 Why did he not cry out اِبى اِبى Abi, Abi [‘My Father, my Father!’]? In Hebrew, God is called Ail. The very meaning of this [verse] is ‘Have mercy and help me and do not leave me abandoned like this (in other words, Protect me)(See Al-Hakam, vol. 12, no. 34, p. 1–4, dated 18 May 1908, via Malfuzat-10, online English edition, page 433).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Matthew 27:46 when the Biblical Jesus said “my god my god..”, MGA said Eisa (as) was supposed to die an accursed death”

Mirza Masroor Ahmad acknowledges the ZERO growth of Ahmadiyya and predicts that after WW3, people will become Ahmadi (2026)

Intro
In 2026 (Jun-5), via a recent episode of “This Week with Huzoor”, Mirza Masroor Ahmad was asked about a prophecy of the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad (the Musleh Maud), in terms Ahmadiyya becoming a global system via “Nizam e Nau” (New World Order)(and via wasiyyat).

In 2026 (Apr)(6:09 time stamp), via an episode of “This Week with Huzoor“, Mirza Masroor Ahmad told an Ahmadi that afteWW-3, after a total destruction of this planet, Ahmadi’s would reconstruct the world via “this Nizam” (aka Wasiyyat and other chanda’s)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter).

Continue reading “Mirza Masroor Ahmad acknowledges the ZERO growth of Ahmadiyya and predicts that after WW3, people will become Ahmadi (2026)”

“Kalimatal Fasl” by Mirza Bashir Ahmad (1915-1916)—in English for the first time ever (2026)

Intro
“Kalimatal Fasl” is the most controversial book in Ahmadiyya, it has the official Qadiani view on Takfir and the prophethood of MGA. It is in English for the first time ever herein (99% accurate). It was written by the only (alleged) college educated son of MGA, Mirza Bashir Ahmad. It should be noted that this book, Kalimatul Fasl was written in the Urdu-Review of Religions of 1915 (March and April) and serialized into book form afterwards. The second edition of Kalimatal Fasl was published again in 1941. Read the full book review herein.


Continue reading ““Kalimatal Fasl” by Mirza Bashir Ahmad (1915-1916)—in English for the first time ever (2026)”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 56:35 of the Quran (56:36 in the Kadiani Koran)

Intro
In 56:35 of the Quran (56:36 in the Kadiani Koran), Allah tells us that in Jannatee (56:12 of the Quran), some of the rewards will be that Allah will give us women who are a new creation.

MGA seems to be silent on this as well as the Qadiani’s.

In 1917, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s in their famous English commentary of the Quran by Maulvi Muhammad Ali in 1917 gave NO commentary at all. 

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 56:35 of the Quran (56:36 in the Kadiani Koran)”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on 4:78 of the Quran (4:79 in the Kadiani Koran)

Intro
In 1891(See RK, v3, p. 423-437, Izala Auham), MGA quoted 4:78 of the Quran (4:79 in the Kadiani Koran) and used this verse as part of his famous 30 verses which somehow proved that Eisa (as) was dead (naozobillah). This is the famous verses (4:78 and 4:79) wherein Allah tells Muslims that ALL GOOD comes from Allah, even those things perceived to be bad (they are part of your growth)(See Tafsir Ibn Kathir, pages 519-521).

We have not seen MGA quote this verse in any other incident as of 6-8-26.

In 1988, via the famous 5-volume English commentary on the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid:

The words, Wheresoever you may be, death will overtake you, may either refer to the general physical law about the inevitability of death, meaning that when one must die sooner or later, there is no reason why one should be so afraid of death as to refuse to fight in a just cause; or they may be taken as particularly addressed to the hypocrites, who disobeyed the Divine command to fight, thinking that in this way they would be able to avoid death. The verse purports to say that God had decreed that they should suffer death and destruction, however well protected they might be.

It was customary with the hypocrites that when Muslims achieved a success, they attributed it to God, saying that since Islam was a divine religion, it was bound to prosper and succeed. But when a misfortune overtook Muslims, they declared that it was due to mistakes committed by the Prophet. The Quran says that from the viewpoint from which they ascribe success to God, failures are also ascribable to Him. By attributing success to God and failure to the Prophet, the hypocrites sought to discredit the Prophet and to lower him in the estimation of Muslims.

The words, Say, All is from Allah, point to the fact that both successes and misfortunes were foretold by the Holy Prophet (e.g. see 2:156-158). So even the failures which the hypocrites attributed to the Holy Prophet really constituted a proof of his truth. The expression, All is from Allah, is also true in this sense that God is the final controlling power in the universe and whatever good or evil befalls man is attributable either to the general law of nature ordained by God or to one or other of His special decrees.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on 4:78 of the Quran (4:79 in the Kadiani Koran)”

The Ahmadiyya graveyard in Hafizabad is blatantly breaking the law

Intro
In the late 1940’s, the government of Pakistan allocated many graveyards to the Ahmadiyya Movement for free. KTV reported on one such graveyard in Mangat Uncha, Hafizabad, Pakistan wherein as he walked around the graveyard, he noticed Islamic symbols like the Kalima on many tombstones. Hassan Rana also pointed out how this graveyard was labeled as “Qadiani”, thus the public knows.

Continue reading “The Ahmadiyya graveyard in Hafizabad is blatantly breaking the law”

Muhammad Hussain Batalvi clearly said that he never knew MGA before 1879

Intro
In the past (See the debate between Bro Imtiaz and Saleem Meer, 2025, time stamp 21:31), Ahmadi’s have used Syed Muhammad Hussain Shah Batalvi as a point of reference in terms of MGA’s life before prophethood (pre-1879). Saleem Meer alleged that Batalvi was the only human being that ever knew MGA and had vouched for MGA as an honest man (this is a total lie). However, in 1893, via “Ainah Kamalate Islam” (See page 355), MGA published a letter from Batalvi wherein Batalvi said that he never knew MGA pre-1879-ish.

Continue reading “Muhammad Hussain Batalvi clearly said that he never knew MGA before 1879”

Strange shooting at Rabwah, Ahmadiyya fake Police are shot

Intro
Rabwah times and other social media outlets are alleging that unknown people shot at a vehicle operated by Hifazat-e-Markaz, a private volunteer security force of the Ahmadiyya Kufree Community, near Aqsa Chowk roundabout in Rabwah on Friday. The shooting occurred while three people were riding on the back of the vehicle. According to initial reports, two individuals were injured. The attackers fled the scene, and authorities have launched an investigation.

Continue reading “Strange shooting at Rabwah, Ahmadiyya fake Police are shot”

An Ahmadi lady stuck in Malaysia is accusing an Ahmadi Murrabi (Faizan Ahmad) of raping her child

Intro
Reports are emerging from TikTok and facebook wherein an Ahmadi lady is accusing an Ahmadi murrabi (and secretary) of raping her under 10 years old daughter. The name of the Ahmadi murrabi is Faizan Ahmad, his linkedin account can be found herein. Faizan Ahmad alleges to be an employee of the UNHCR and is working while on asylum and stuck in Malaysia himself. See additional clips on TikTok herein and herein. Check out this video too.

Continue reading “An Ahmadi lady stuck in Malaysia is accusing an Ahmadi Murrabi (Faizan Ahmad) of raping her child”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑