Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Fauzia Faizi confirms that the Mirza family is full of incest and rapists

Intro
The Mirza family are a group of sick people. MGA’s son, the famous Musleh Maud preyed on boys and girls. The British Government allowed him to do whatever he wanted. A few years ago, Fauzia Faizi did an interview wherein she described the inner workings of the Mirza family, Samina Khan, a German politician also weighed in. Fauzia Faizi also discussed how Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad was raping his own daughter and etc. Fauzia Faizi is the great grand daughter of a companion of MGA, Dr. Syed Abdus Sattar Shah. She is also the niece of Abd u Rehman Khadim (Author of Ahmadiyya Pocket Book). In 2021, a great-great grand-daughter of MGA accused the 5th Khalifa and his gang of admin as sexual predators and rapists. 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
The family of Fauzia Faizi Continue reading “Fauzia Faizi confirms that the Mirza family is full of incest and rapists”

Featured post

Dr. Abdus Salam liked white women, alcohol and a busy British lifestyle

Intro
Dr. Salam (29 January 1926 – 21 November 1996) had allegiance to Ahmadiyya, he respected the religion of his father, he thus never challenged anything in Ahmadiyya, he also believed that his intelligence was based on a revelation of MGA (see Tajalliyyat-e-Ilahiyyah, pages 20-21), in fact, in 1979 at the Jalsa in Rabwah, Salam claimed that it was the prayers of MGA which helped him become a Nobel winner. His contributions to the 1979 Nobel Prize award seem to be plagiarized and a result of schmoozing. In fact, Sheldon Glashow (with whom Dr. Salam won the Nobel Prize with) directly accused of Dr. Salam of having no contribution. Interestingly, Salam never attempted to solve the scientific irregularities of the Ahmadiyya religion, like Yus Asaf and the eclipses.

Dr. Abdus Salam was a particle-physicist, which is the closest branch to Nuclear Physics (he explains it himself herein). Born in 1926, he was always a gifted student, there are many stories, he received his MA in Mathematics from the Government College University in 1946. That same year, he was awarded a scholarship (that was supposed to be given to the sons of poor farmers) to St John’s College, Cambridge the UK, where he completed a BA degree with Double First-Class Honours in Mathematics and Physics in 1949.

He then returned to Pakistan and began lecturing at the Government College and Punjab University, Lahore (1951- 1953). After the Ahmadiyya riots of 1953, Dr. Salam hated Pakistan, turned his back on Pakistan and left for Europe. Just a year later, he was hired by the United Nations, he was already schmoozing with the nuclear energy establishment via NATO. He was working as the Scientific Secretary, Geneva Conferences on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy in 1955 and 1958. This led Salam to be a Member, Atomic Energy Commission, Pakistan (1958-1974) by President Ayub Khan. In 1958, Dr. Abdus Salam met Sigvard Arne Eklund at the 2nd annual “Geneva Conferences on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy”, they made fast friends. In 1961, Sigvard Arne Eklund was named the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, a post that he held until 1981. This connection between Dr. Salam and Sigvard Arne Eklund proved fruitful for Salam, he was able to secure the funding needed for this ICTP in 1964. He worked with Ishrat Hussain Usmani. Salam and Usmani seem to have had a nuclear reactor built in Pakistan by the Canadian Government. Some other great Pakistani physicist’s were Nazir Ahmed, Ishfaq Ahmad Khan, Iqbal Hussain Qureshi and Abdul Qadeer Khan. 

In 1962, Salam met a very young Physics student, Louise Dame Napier Johnson. Attending an antinuclear proliferation meeting in London in 1962, Salam had met Louise Johnson, then a physics undergraduate at University College London (UCL), who was helping with the meeting’s
administration. It was what the French call un coup de foudre, an emotional lightning strike, such as Salam had not experienced since seeing the inaccessible Urmilla at Government College, Lahore, some twenty years before. Louise was only 20 years old, and Salam was 36. It should be noted that Ahmadiyya literature never mentions his second wife (girlfriend) and those circumstances (see the Al-Nahl of 1997, which has 200+ pages of data on Dr. Salam, however, they barely mention his second wife and those 2 amazing kids, see page 200, it is nevertheless from a Pakistani newspaper). Dr. Dame Louise Napier Johnson was never his wife, instead a life-long girlfriend. Allegedly, a few years later, he had an ahmadi-mullah read the Nikkah. His son was born in 1974 (Umar) and a daughter was born in 1982 (Saeeda). Both of these children are shunned by the Ahmadiyya Movement.

In 1964, with funding from the United Nations, Dr. Abdus Salam opened the ICTP. Recently, Qaiser Raja did a really expose’ of Dr. Abdus Salam and his shenanigans via Paul Dombey. In terms of being a schmoozer, Dr. Abdus Salam used ICTP’s fund to woo members of the Nobel Prize committee, like Paul Dirac and Waller, with all expense paid trips to Trieste. In fact, Waller visited every single summer for about 10 years, all expenses paid. Paul Dirac even had his birthday celebrated therein (1972) via huge parties wherein most likely alcohol was consumed and food was thrown around lavishly. In fact, the entire idea of the ICTP seems to be a scam to steal scientist from developing countries and use them in the West accordingly. But why were they wasting money on such lavishness? Nevertheless, it worked out for Dr. Abdus Salam, he used the ICTP to fraternize with other famous physicists like Werner Heisenberg, Eugene Paul Wigner, Hans Albrecht Bethe, Hendrik Casimir and Rudolf Peierls. Dr. Abdus Salam also revealed that by the mid 1980’s, the USA, UK and others (NATO) were against the ICTP. 

From 1971 until 1978, Paul Dirac nominated Dr. Abdus Salam for the Nobel Prize on various accounts. In 1976, Erik Wilhelm Hulthén became the head of the Nobel Prize Committee and Salam devised a scheme that most likely land him the Nobel Prize. Dr. Salam even jokingly prayed to God for success in his diabolical scheme. Frank Close even tells a stories wherein Dr. Salam was dying to be associated with Weinberg and his theories. Yet again, in 1978, Paul Dirac wrote a letter of Recommendation and nominated Dr. Abdus Salam to win a Nobel Prize.

Nevertheless, per the order of his Khalifa, he worked for Pakistan and Italy simultaneously and as an esteemed College Professor at Cambridge. However, after Ahmadi’s were declared Non-Muslim in 1974, he left his job with the Pakistani government and began to focus on his school of Physics in Trieste, Italy. Oct 1974 to late 1978 seems to be a dead era in his career.

In 1979, he won the Nobel Prize in Physics. In 1979, the President of Pakistan and head military dictator, Zia ul Haq invited Dr. Salaam to Pakistan and gave him full presidential treatment, they asked him to build a center of Physics, he was wined and dined, nevertheless, he still left Pakistan in 1980 and continued to work for Italy.

In 1990, via the Muslim Sunrise of the 3rd Quarter, a speech of Dr. Abdus Salam from 1984 is reproduced. This was a speech allegedly given by Dr. Abdus Salam in Paris, France, in a meeting wherein “Islam and the West” was being discussed, at the UNESCO house on April-27-1984. In this speech, Dr. Abdus Salam quoted 88:17 of the Quran, however, it seems to be portions of 88:17 to 88:20. Dr. Abdus Salam also quoted 3:188 (3:189 in the Kadiani Koran) and portions of 3:189 (3:190 in the Kadiani Koran). Dr. Abdus Salam argued that Muslims scientist had already discovered much of what the Europeans had recently discovered. Dr. Salam quoted Ibn Khaldun, Al-Biruni, Ibn-i-Sina, Ibn-al-Haitham, Ibn Rushd, and connected Al-Ghazzali to the decline in Islamic sciences. He even quoted Chapter 2:1-3 of the Quran. Dr. Salam mentioned Einstein as the greatest physicist of all time and Heisenberg, he also mentioned Galileo.

Eventually, he died in 1996 of a rare brain disease wherein he had become a mute and at the house of his 2nd wife. Polygamy in the UK was illegal, hence, his second wife, Dr. Johnson was more like a lifelong girlfriend in British law. Abdus Salaam’s son, Ahmad Salaam, recently gave an interview herein wherein he discusses his father.

nobelprizeinphysicstoabdussalam_cd304f1f659c6e52ab50fe4c8ec5a1c5ebb1d3d8

Continue reading “Dr. Abdus Salam liked white women, alcohol and a busy British lifestyle”

Featured post

Did Eisa (as) get the injil revealed to him while he was getting oil massages from prostitutes?

Intro
In 1892-1893 (See A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, page 598, online English edition), MGA and his team of writers wrote vs. Batalvi. They alleged that Batalvi was making wild allegations against MGA just like how true prophets like Musa (as) and Eisa (as) were accused. They alleged that these allegations were good behavior, however, it was reported as vile behavior. MGA and his team of writers gave the example of Eisa (as) going into a home of an adulteress and allowing her to use perfume on his body, however, this perfume, she had not earned lawfully and Eisa (as) never stopped her too. MGA and his team of writers argued that these were good behaviors in the shape of words and deeds, which are considered utterly absurd and disgraceful in the view of men like Batalvi.

In 1903, after alleging that Eisa (as) was fond of prostitutes in many books (See A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, RK, v5, p597-Urdu)(See Nur-ul-Quran, RK-v9 p.449-Urdu)(Zamimah Anjam Atham, RK, V-11 p.291)(2016 edition of Malfuzat, Volume-3, Page 279-Urdu, Initially Published in Rabwah, 1961, in Urdu, covering the period from November 1901 to October 14, 1902), MGA added the argument that Eisa (as) was getting oil massages from prostitutes while Allah was revealing the injil to him (See Malfuzat, Vol. 3, page 289-Urdu,1903, via Al hakam Jild 6 number 40. 10 Nov 1902 pg 3).

In 2024 (Feb-3), Bro Imtiaz streamed on Dawah Wise (30:10 time stamp) and explained how MGA made the argument that Eisa (as) was getting oil massages from prostitutes while Allah was revealing the injil to him (See Malfuzat, Vol. 3, page 289-Urdu,1903, via Al hakam Jild 6 number 40. 10 Nov 1902 pg 3).

In 2026 (38:24 timestamp), in response to this, in March-2026, Maulvi Razi alleged that MGA wasn’t quoting the Bible word-for-word when he alleged that “Eisa (as) was getting oil massages from prostitutes while Allah was revealing the injil to him”. Maulvi Razi also called it “ilzami jawab”. However, in all of Razi’s references, there wasn’t a single example of anyone else alleging that “Eisa (as) was getting oil massages from prostitutes while Allah was revealing the injil to him”, that remains unique to MGA. Maulvi Razi also called it “Istadlaal” (Reasoning) via ilzami jawab. Maulvi Razi even blamed Muslim ulema in some commentaries for adding stories (See the clip on Tiktok and Twitter). As far as going into the house of a prostitute, MGA wrote this in A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, page 598, online English edition, however, that is not the case in Luke 7:36-50. In Luke 7:36-50, Jesus was invited to the house of the Pharisees, not some adulteress.


1903, Malfuzat, Vol. 3, page 289

Continue reading “Did Eisa (as) get the injil revealed to him while he was getting oil massages from prostitutes?”

Bro Imtiaz vs. fake Ahmadi, Tahir (@yahaji91101) from Australia, 3-24-26

Intro
There is a super ignorant fake-Ahmadi running around TikTok named Tahir (@yahaji91101), he has been begging me to debate him, however, I don’t talk to duffers as such. Nevertheless, Bro Imtiaz engaged him on 3-25-26. In this discussion, Tahir (@yahaji91101) admitted to being an idiot and thus didn’t answer any question.

Continue reading “Bro Imtiaz vs. fake Ahmadi, Tahir (@yahaji91101) from Australia, 3-24-26”

Who is John A. Lant?

Intro
John A. Lant began working for the Moslem World Publishing Company in July 1893, editing articles for the Moslem World (See Dannin and Singleton). Prior to joining Webb, Lant had spent decades as a printer and proprietor of several newspapers, which espoused his radical socialist and Freethought views. At various times he edited the Toledo Sun, The Impending Crisis, Labor, The Liberator, and Record of the Times. Lant joined with Lewis Masquerier and the Land Reform movement as well as the Knights of Labor. He was also a Comrade in the Grand Army of the Republic, a Civil War veterans’ organization, having served honorably with the 23rd Infantry Regiment of Pennsylvania. Lant and Webb seemed to have developed a genuine respect for one another’s work, and both men’s families interacted socially. Early in the relationship, Lant wrote to Webb, “If all your friends and inquirers would say a word you would have a great deal more than you could read…I hope you will not give way under the pressure, and will ever be inspired by the importance and benefits to come from your mission. Your task seems audacious and Herculean, but it is a task I am free to admit has its merits even in enlightened America.”

In 1893 (July), John A. Lant began working for the Moslem World Publishing Company, editing articles for the Moslem World (See Singleton).

In 1894 (May-3), the Brandon Mail of Thu, May 03, 1894 ·Page 3 of Brandon, Manitoba, Canada carried an essay by John A. Lant about “About Religious Rites”, wherein Lant wrote about sacrifice in general, he writes about the Brahmins too.

In 1893 (Oct-8), The New York Times of Sun, Oct 08, 1893 ·Page 21 reported that Mr. Webb had opened his “Moslem Temple” and was planning to open a “School of Morality”. Alexander Russell Webb, who recently returned to the USA from a long tour in Asia and intent on spreading Islam in America. It is reported that Webb has opened his Moslem Temple for his public lectures at 458 West 20th St, attendance was reported as “fair”. Emin Nabakoff, one of Mr. Webb‘s associates was wearing a roomy fez, Webb was also wearing the fez. John H. Lant (a new student of Islam) was there too and Leon Landsburg spoke on the morality, honesty and sobriety of Islamic life. Webb emphatically stated that he was not on a mission to get mass converts to Islam. Webb alleged that Islamic life was higher in morals. Webb proposes to open a “School of Morality”, which would be free to the public as well as free literature. Webb announces that there will be meetings every Friday evening as well as informal talks on Sunday afternoon. Webb proposes to create circles of 5 people which can help someone remain morally upright.

In 1893 (Dec-11), via the New York Herald of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 1, Islam in Union Square is reported on. Allegedly, Muezzin Nabakoff (aka Emin L. Nabakoff), gave the adhan (call to prayer). The headline tells the world that there seems to be a split in the white Moslems of New York, however, Webb says that he is the only Sheikh with the money and the others don’t count. On Dec-10-1893, at 10am, at 8 Union Square, NY, on the top of a stoop of an unpretentious brick building, was a grey bearded and of full figure was Emin L. Nabakoff, he recited the adhan. Muhammad Webb has called Nabakoff a fakir. A split in the white Moslem community is expected. It is mentioned how Islam in America has been financed by Haji Abdullah Arab (allegedly a merchant prince from Jeddah). The newspaper mentions how this money was used to start the Moslem World newspaper and the offices at 458 W. 20th St, Ny, NY. The newspaper explains how Webb isn’t interested in holding the 5 daily prayers, instead, Webb gives lectures on Friday evenings and on Sunday, meetings of inquiry are held. Western tours are being made by Webb‘s team. Within a few weeks, 4 teachers from India will be arriving and will help Webb with translations. Webb is not alarmed by Emin L. Nabakoff and his break-away group of white Moslems. Webb explains how he met Emin L. Nabakoff, Webb alleges that Nabakoff is 45 years old and is Russian and was vouched for by Quilliam. Webb even alleges that Quilliam is running an office for Webb in Liverpool. Webb accuses Nabakoff of being a “nickel-in-the-slot machine” which would yield a love letters and fortunes. Webb alleges to have received letters of warning about Nabakoff too. Webb alleges that he told Nabakoff to “get-lost” and he hadn’t heard from him until his adhan in Union Square. Webb also mentions John A. Lant and how he “conveniently” converted to pseudo-Islam when he heard how much money Webb had been given. Webb alleges that the newspaper reported that Webb had been given 100k and even 1 million (however, the currency is not mentioned, dollars or rupees?). Webb alleges that Lant showed up looking for work and is from Tarrytown, wherein he was running a newspaper. Webb alleges that Lant wanted $25 a week as salary and Webb refused, which caused Lant to leave and now team up with Nabakoff (aka the Union Square Movement). Webb is called “Sheikh ul Islam” in the USA. Webb scoffed at the adhan at 10am and called it blasphemy. Webb explains how 10am is never time for any daily prayer. Webb confessed that the daily prayers are not offered at his business offices. The Turkish consul in NY had heard about this meeting in Union square and sent a representative, who eventually made it to Webb‘s office (See also Democrat and Chronicle of Tue, Dec 12, 1893 ·Page 9)(See also Passaic Daily Herald of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 1)(See also The Atlanta Journal of Sat, Dec 16, 1893 ·Page 6)(See also the Stamford Advocate of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 2)(See also The Times of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 3)(See also the Mount Vernon Argus of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 2)(See also The Omaha Evening Bee of Fri, Dec 15, 1893 ·Page 4)(See also The Waterbury Democrat of
Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 4).

In 1894 (Dec-12), via the Buffalo Courier Express of Wed, Dec 12, 1894 ·Page 10 reported that Alexander Russell Mohammed Webb was ex-communicated by “The American Moslem Institute” because Webb instead of giving a lecture went and got drunk (See also The Indianapolis Journal of Sun, Dec 02, 1894 ·Page 12). This was posted from the New York Advertiser. The meeting of the “The American Moslem Institute” took place at No. 20 East 23rd St, ny, NY. Nafeesah M.T. Keep was also there as well as John A. Lant and Emin L. Nabakoff. There were also a few police officers on the scene, in case Webb showed up and tried to assault people. They were there to celebrate the 1-year anniversary of the first ever Adhan given in the USA in 1893. Princess Sophia Adelaide was there too as well as A.L. Rawson. Resolutions were passed which gave legality to the American Moslem Institute, it was a branch of the Moslem Institute of Liverpool (via Quilliam). By-laws were also established, Nafeesah was given salary of $30 per month. Nafeesah then accused Webb of being a drunkard, much to the confusion of Nabakoff and Lant. Nafeesah read from the “Commercial Gazette of Cincinnati” from Dec-1-1894. Webb was unanimously repudiated (See also the Baptist and Reflector of Thu, Dec 27, 1894 ·Page 1)(See also the Vermont Chronicle of Fri, Dec 07, 1894 ·Page 5)(see also The Times-Union of Wed, Dec 12, 1894 ·Page 4).

In 1895 (Dec), The New York Times of Sun, Dec 01, 1895 ·Page 2 dedicated an entire page to the failures of Alexander Russell Mohammad Webb in America entitled, “The Fall of Islam in America, ” New York Times, Dec. 1, 1895, p. 2. In 1895, the Nawab of Basoda was Nawab Omar Ali Khan, who ruled the small Central Indian principality until his death that year. Nevertheless, the Nawab of Basoda alleged that he gave Webb 40-50,000 british pounds. However, Webb says that it was only 2000 British pounds. The newspaper alleges that Webb is living in poverty. It seems that the Nawab of Basoda was in the USA and was wanting to see what was the result of his investment. Nawab of Basoda didn’t see much and never met Webb either. The Nawab of Basoda was accompanied by Mr. William Mackinnon (hard headed, a shrewd-spoken scotch man, secretary to the Nawab and interpreter). Before leaving America, the Nawab of Basoda told the New York Times all of this via Mr. William Mackinnon. The newspaper mentions how Webb travelled thru India and to Hyderabad, India, and how wealthy Indian’s had paid for him to do so. Among one of these was Haji Abdullah Arab, who personally gave 5000 British pounds. It is alleged that the Nizam of Hyderabad (Mahboob Ali Khan?) gave a huge sum of money for Islam to spread in America. The Nawab of Basoda confessed that he hadn’t given Webb any money, nevertheless, he wanted to see an update and was shocked to see nothing. The Nawab of Basoda also said that some of the money was given to Webb in India and lots of it was sent to America and all the records of that are missing. A man named J.A. Lant of Tarrytown-on-the-Hudson met with The Nawab of Basoda and Mr. William Mackinnon. Lant alleged that Webb owed him 600 British pounds for services rendered in connected with Webb’s newspaper. Webb’s failures in America are highlighted. Webb hoodwinked Indian Muslims! Webb’s business address in Ulster Park, NY is mentioned in detail. The newspaper mentions how Webb looked nothing like a Muslim who had been to India, he looked like a common farmer in New York in 1895. The reported for the newspaper met Webb and gave these observations. Webb said that he didn’t know that the Nawab of Basoda was in town, Webb questioned why the Nawab didn’t come to Ulster Park to see for himself. Webb denies receiving 40-50,000 British pounds. Webb alleges that 20k US dollars have been spent by himself and his mission in this pursuit. Webb denies that Haji Abdullah Arab gave him 5000 British pounds. Webb alleged that the Nizam of Hyderabad never gave him a penny, nor did any other Indian. Webb alleged that he never personally received even a single rupee and that he never received money in-person, whatever was given to him via “offering” was turned over to Haji Abdullah Arab. Webb alleges that he was offered 32k US Dollars in incremental payments of 13k for the first year, 10k for 2nd and 3rd year. This payment included maintenance for Webb and his family. Webb alleges that people thought he came to the USA with 1 million dollars and began to try to leech off of him and failed. Webb alleges that Lant was one of these leeches. Webb alleges that Hamid Snow was another. Webb alleges that Lant and Snow caused Haji Abdullah Arab to break his contract with Webb and thus left Webb in poverty. Webb alleges that a single Moslem in India is supporting him financially right now. Webb admitted to not preaching Islam in Ulster Park.

In 1896 (Jan-22), after the First Society for the Study of Islam ceased, Nabakoff and Lant continued to defend and promote Islam in America and corresponded with the Liverpool Muslims, albeit with ever-decreasing frequency. In January 1896, the Crescent announced that Lant supported forming branches of the International Moslem Union in the major cities of India, which would be affiliated with the Liverpool Moslem Institute (See “The International Moslem Union,” Crescent, January 22, 1896, p. 469). The following month, the same publication printed a letter from him scolding the American press’ reporting on the Armenian crisis in Turkey (See “The Armenian Fizzle,” Crescent, February 19 1896, p. 541, via Singleton).

In 1897 (Apr-28), the Crescent mentioned Nabakoff more than Lant, and despite his continued residence in New York the paper referred to him as a member of the Liverpool Moslem Institute. Nabakoff continued to lecture and debate for the cause of Islam. In April 1897, he debated at the Manhattan Liberal Club in favor of Turkey’s position concerning the Greco-Turkish war of the time (See “A Liverpool Muslim defends the faith in New York,” Crescent, April 28 1897, p. 268, via Singleton). Later that year, he appeared on the roster of speakers at the Tennessee Centennial Exposition’s conference of comparative religions (See “Henry H. Moore elected,” Brooklyn Eagle, October 15 1897, p. 7, via Singleton).

In 1900 (Dec-26), Hamid Snow sent a letter to the “Crescent” announcing “J. Muhammed Lant” as the first pastor of the American branch of the Church of Islam, Snow’s India-based mission (See “A voice from India,” Crescent, December 26 1900, p. 407, Via Singleton).

In 1901 (Sep-1), the St. Louis Post-Dispatch of Sun, Sep 01, 1901 ·Page 3 reported on an Islamic mission in the Philippines. The newspaper alleges that there are currently 9 Moslem missionaries in Manila, of which 3 are white, 2 are Philippinos and 2 Malay’s. The head of the mission is Emin Nabakoff. Nabakoff had a brother in the Russian military 15 years ago. Nabakoff was previously a bishop in the Greek Church of Sitka, Alaska. Nabakoff allegedly converted to Islam by himself in Alaska. It is mentioned how Nabakoff was previously working under Webb and how they collapsed. After Webb, Nabakoff got involved with the “International Muslim Union” or “Young Turks Party”. Nabakoff was hired by the “International Muslim Union” in Ludhiana, British India to manage their missions in Malaysia and the Philippines. Mohammed Price and Ali Lant are working closely with Nabakoff (both are native born Americans and veterans of the civil war). It is reported that Hamid Snow will run the mission from Ludhiana and Nejib Selim from Singapore.

Continue reading “Who is John A. Lant?”

Who is Dr. Emin L. Nabakoff? A White Russian man that converted to pseudo-Islam in 1893?

Intro
Dr. Emin L. Nabakoff seems to have been a Russian and fake Muslim. He begins to appear in American newspapers in 1893 (Oct-8). By Dec-1893, Webb accuses Nabakoff of being a “nickel-in-the-slot machine” which would yield a love letters and fortunes. Webb alleges to have received letters of warning about Nabakoff too. Webb alleges that he told Nabakoff to “get-lost” and he hadn’t heard from him until his adhan in Union Square (See the New York Herald of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 1). Emin L. Nabakoff came to New York in August 1893 from Liverpool, England, and quickly joined the ranks of the American Moslem Brotherhood. Russian-born, he was an American citizen by virtue of his residency in Alaska during that territory’s transfer to the United States in 1867. However, prior to coming to New York, he had spent the previous several years in England as an active member within the Liverpool Moslem Institute. In Liverpool, he frequently gave lectures on various Muslim themes and chaired meetings of the Institute. He also served for two years on the Institute’s operating committee (See Dannin).

In the Oct-1893 edition of “The Crescent“, it is stated that Emin Nabakoff is in NY.

In 1893 (Oct-8), The New York Times of Sun, Oct 08, 1893 ·Page 21 reported that Mr. Webb had opened his “Moslem Temple” and was planning to open a “School of Morality”. Alexander Russell Webb, who recently returned to the USA from a long tour in Asia and intent on spreading Islam in America. It is reported that Webb has opened his Moslem Temple for his public lectures at 458 West 20th St, attendance was reported as “fair”. Emin Nabakoff, one of Mr. Webb‘s associates was wearing a roomy fez, Webb was also wearing the fez. John H. Lant (a new student of Islam) was there too and Leon Landsburg spoke on the morality, honesty and sobriety of Islamic life. Webb emphatically stated that he was not on a mission to get mass converts to Islam. Webb alleged that Islamic life was higher in morals. Webb proposes to open a “School of Morality”, which would be free to the public as well as free literature. Webb announces that there will be meetings every Friday evening as well as informal talks on Sunday afternoon. Webb proposes to create circles of 5 people which can help someone remain morally upright.

In 1893 (Dec-11), via the New York Herald of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 1, Islam in Union Square is reported on. Allegedly, Muezzin Nabakoff (aka Emin L. Nabakoff), gave the adhan (call to prayer). The headline tells the world that there seems to be a split in the white Moslems of New York, however, Webb says that he is the only Sheikh with the money and the others don’t count. On Dec-10-1893, at 10am, at 8 Union Square, NY, on the top of a stoop of an unpretentious brick building, was a grey bearded and of full figure was Emin L. Nabakoff, he recited the adhan. Muhammad Webb has called Nabakoff a fakir. A split in the white Moslem community is expected. It is mentioned how Islam in America has been financed by Haji Abdullah Arab (allegedly a merchant prince from Jeddah). The newspaper mentions how this money was used to start the Moslem World newspaper and the offices at 458 W. 20th St, Ny, NY. The newspaper explains how Webb isn’t interested in holding the 5 daily prayers, instead, Webb gives lectures on Friday evenings and on Sunday, meetings of inquiry are held. Western tours are being made by Webb‘s team. Within a few weeks, 4 teachers from India will be arriving and will help Webb with translations. Webb is not alarmed by Emin L. Nabakoff and his break-away group of white Moslems. Webb explains how he met Emin L. Nabakoff, Webb alleges that Nabakoff is 45 years old and is Russian and was vouched for by Quilliam. Webb even alleges that Quilliam is running an office for Webb in Liverpool. Webb accuses Nabakoff of being a “nickel-in-the-slot machine” which would yield a love letters and fortunes. Webb alleges to have received letters of warning about Nabakoff too. Webb alleges that he told Nabakoff to “get-lost” and he hadn’t heard from him until his adhan in Union Square. Webb also mentions John A. Lant and how he “conveniently” converted to pseudo-Islam when he heard how much money Webb had been given. Webb alleges that the newspaper reported that Webb had been given 100k and even 1 million (however, the currency is not mentioned, dollars or rupees?). Webb alleges that Lant showed up looking for work and is from Tarrytown, wherein he was running a newspaper. Webb alleges that Lant wanted $25 a week as salary and Webb refused, which caused Lant to leave and now team up with Nabakoff (aka the Union Square Movement). Webb is called “Sheikh ul Islam” in the USA. Webb scoffed at the adhan at 10am and called it blasphemy. Webb explains how 10am is never time for any daily prayer. Webb confessed that the daily prayers are not offered at his business offices. The Turkish consul in NY had heard about this meeting in Union square and sent a representative, who eventually made it to Webb‘s office (See also Democrat and Chronicle of Tue, Dec 12, 1893 ·Page 9)(See also Passaic Daily Herald of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 1)(See also The Atlanta Journal of Sat, Dec 16, 1893 ·Page 6)(See also the Stamford Advocate of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 2)(See also The Times of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 3)(See also the Mount Vernon Argus of Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 2)(See also The Omaha Evening Bee of Fri, Dec 15, 1893 ·Page 4)(See also The Waterbury Democrat of
Mon, Dec 11, 1893 ·Page 4).

In 1893 (Dec-25), via The Inter Ocean of Mon, Dec 25, 1893 ·Page 3, reported that Dr. Nabakoff gave the adhan publicly and also lectured on the social position of women in Mohammedan lands. It is reported that Nabakoff argued that western women could never understand (incomprehensible) the life of an Asian woman (oriental). Nabakoff argues that most Muslims are following their tribal customs instead of adhering to the Islamic laws and thus this is their folly. Nabakoff argued: thus, in Morocco and Algeria there is more slavery and polygamy than in India and in Turkey. Nabakoff blamed polygamy on Daud (as) and Solomon (as). Nabakoff alleged that the practice of polygamy was dying in Turkey. Nabakoff argued that Muhammad (Saw) allowed 4 wives and this was an honorable way to treat a woman (See also New-York Tribune of Mon, Dec 25, 1893 ·Page 3).

In 1893 (Dec-29), via The Morning Journal-Courier of Fri, Dec 29, 1893 ·Page 1, the Mohammedan propaganda seems to making some progress. Emin L. Nabakoff (a Russian) keeps giving the adhan out of windows on Sunday in Union Square. The literary work of Webb is also mentioned. People who hear the Adhan go into a room to hear a lecture. The newspaper alleges that these white Moslem’s have been facing a backlash over Islam and women. The newspaper reports that Muhammad (Saw) had said that the majority of people in Hell will be women and in heaven, there will be black eyed women ready for sex. However, these white Moslems argued that salvation was for men and women. Nabakoff argued that the Quran doesn’t say that women have no soul. Nabakoff argued that polygamy is vanishing in Islamic lands under western supervision, Nabakoff also argued that whether a Muslim marries 1 or 4 wives, they will be held in esteem. The newspaper alleges a story wherein Muhammad (Saw) told an old woman that only young women were allowed in heaven (See also The Portland Daily Press of Fri, Dec 29, 1893 ·Page 4).

In 1893 (Dec-31), via The St. Joseph Herald of Sun, Dec 31, 1893 ·Page 4 (of St. Joseph, Missouri) it is reported about Islam in New York City. However, Mohammed Alexander Webb has nothing to do with it. Instead, a Russian man named Emin L. Nabakoff gives the Adhan every Sunday from the windows of 8 Union Square. From the streets, people hear the adhan and are ushered into a Hall. Nabakoff recently gave a lecture on Women in Islam and how salvation was equal for men and women in Islam. Nabakoff argued that if the Quran said that women have no soul, the Quran would be worthless. The newspaper makes a note how in George Sale’s English translation of the Quran, there is no such inference. Nabakoff argued that polygamy was vanishing in Islamic lands. Nabakoff argued that whether a man had 1 or 4 wives, they would all be respected and held in esteem (See also The News and Observer of Sat, Dec 30, 1893 ·Page 1).

In 1894 (Jan-15), The Brooklyn Citizen of Mon, Jan 15, 1894 ·Page 6 alleged that there is a Mahometan religious service every Sunday on Fulton Street. In a small suite of rooms at No. 515 Fulton Street called Jackson Hall a remarkable service was held yesterday afternoon. 22 people showed up, 14 women and only 8 men. Emin Nabakoff is described as an Arabian and he wore a Fez. Allegedly, at 3pm, the adhan was given by Nabakoff. Nabakoff gave a speech thereafter and alleged that Muslims don’t pray like Christians wherein they beg God for things. Nabakoff seems to argue that Allah of Islam has destined many things in the life of a Muslim, thus, there is no point in asking for anything. Nabakoff allegedly read some verses of the Quran, the verses of infanticide were read. Nabakoff made a comparison between infanticide and a man having 4 wives (polygamy) and alleged that both are in terms of population control. Nabakoff will have these weekly lectures every Sunday (See also The Brooklyn Daily Times of Sat, Jan 20, 1894 ·Page 8)(See also The Brooklyn Daily Times of Sat, Jan 27, 1894 ·Page 11).

In 1895 (Jan-26), The Plain Dealer of Sat, Jan 26, 1895 ·Page 4 reported that Email Nabakoff is still preaching Islam to degenerate New Yorker and argued that countries that have Islam have NO lying, NO robbery and NO stealing of other men’s wives (See also The Sacramento Union of Wed, Feb 13, 1895 ·Page 8)(See also The Indianapolis Journal of Sat, Jan 26, 1895 ·Page 4)(See also The Savannah Morning News of Tue, Jan 29, 1895 ·Page 4).

In 1896 (Jan-22), after the First Society for the Study of Islam ceased, Nabakoff and Lant continued to defend and promote Islam in America and corresponded with the Liverpool Muslims, albeit with ever-decreasing frequency. In January 1896, the Crescent announced that Lant supported forming branches of the International Moslem Union in the major cities of India, which would be affiliated with the Liverpool Moslem Institute (See “The International Moslem Union,” Crescent, January 22, 1896, p. 469). The following month, the same publication printed a letter from him scolding the American press’ reporting on the Armenian crisis in Turkey (See “The Armenian Fizzle,” Crescent, February 19 1896, p. 541, via Singleton).

In 1897 (Apr-28), the Crescent mentioned Nabakoff more than Lant, and despite his continued residence in New York the paper referred to him as a member of the Liverpool Moslem Institute. Nabakoff continued to lecture and debate for the cause of Islam. In April 1897, he debated at the Manhattan Liberal Club in favor of Turkey’s position concerning the Greco-Turkish war of the time (See “A Liverpool Muslim defends the faith in New York,” Crescent, April 28 1897, p. 268, via Singleton). Later that year, he appeared on the roster of speakers at the Tennessee Centennial Exposition’s conference of comparative religions (See “Henry H. Moore elected,” Brooklyn Eagle, October 15 1897, p. 7, via Singleton).

In 1897 (Oct-23), via the Chattanooga Daily Times of Sat, Oct 23, 1897 ·Page 2 there seems to have been a congress of Religions wherein Emin L. Nabakoff represented Islam.

In 1898 (Jan), the final mention of Nabakoff in the Crescent is noted, when it was announced
that he was appointed as a Notary Public for the state of New York (See “Editorial notes,” Crescent, January 26 1898, p. 57, via Singleton).

In 1901 (Sep-1), the St. Louis Post-Dispatch of Sun, Sep 01, 1901 ·Page 3 reported on an Islamic mission in the Philippines. The newspaper alleges that there are currently 9 Moslem missionaries in Manila, of which 3 are white, 2 are Philippinos and 2 Malay’s. The head of the mission is Emin Nabakoff. Nabakoff had a brother in the Russian military 15 years ago. Nabakoff was previously a bishop in the Greek Church of Sitka, Alaska. Nabakoff allegedly converted to Islam by himself in Alaska. It is mentioned how Nabakoff was previously working under Webb and how they collapsed. After Webb, Nabakoff got involved with the “International Muslim Union” or “Young Turks Party”. Nabakoff was hired by the “International Muslim Union” in Ludhiana, British India to manage their missions in Malaysia and the Philippines. Mohammed Price and Ali Lant are working closely with Nabakoff (both are native born Americans and veterans of the civil war). It is reported that Hamid Snow will run the mission from Ludhiana and Nejib Selim from Singapore.

Continue reading “Who is Dr. Emin L. Nabakoff? A White Russian man that converted to pseudo-Islam in 1893?”

“Hazrat Amir ul Munafiqeen’s fresh wet dream”—Al Fazal March 20, 1947

Intro
In March of 1947, the Al Fazal March 20 published a new dream of Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad (the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa) from Qadian (See the commentary by Zaitoon FM). Check out my master essay on MGA and Tauhid herein.

Via a dream/Kashf, Khalifa Zani sees a hot girl in his dream in heaven and she follows him into his garden. He then molests her, grabbing her from her chin and says you have to join my wives (be my woman) and she’s shocked… he later reveals that that hot girl is naudubillah “Allah”… like his father he lusted after his god.

What is the context? Mahmud Ahmad see’s a dream wherein he is speaking to an English doctor. However, it seems like the 2nd Khalifa is advising the doctor. He tells the doctor 3 things:

1-you should take medicine
2-some other things
3-he forgets.

The 2nd Khalifa then remembers and says that he told the doctor to write him a letter wherein he asked the 2nd Khalifa for prayers. Later on, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa wakes up.

Thereafter, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa see’s a vision wherein in his left hand is a small bottle of red medicine which is open. The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa says that this means that there will be some disease that will spread. The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa then says that he will narrate another dream and people will object to it. He says that in this dream/kashf wherein he is walking for miles, like a hole in the ground, he alleges to have seen Hell and flames. He then says that one of the flames becomes a man, then the seems to be telling people to read the Quran. He then ends up in Islamic paradise and he see’s a woman, who is extremely beautiful and she is reciting the Quran, or doing dhikhr. She then goes into her garden and the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa follows her and grabs her by the chin, the Khalifa tells the woman that she will become one of his wives. However, then, the 2nd-Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa alleges that he comes to know that this woman was Allah (naozobillah). The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa tries to explain this and says that MGA had a revelation, “ya shams, ya qamar”, according to this revelation, MGA was the sun and Allah was the moon (that reflected the light of MGA). The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa then argues that this is how women receive sperm from men. The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa then argues that MGA is the man and Allah is the woman (naozobillah), via comparison. The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa also argued that eyes can’t reach Allah, but Allah can reach the eyes. The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa then argues that Allah becomes the hands of believers (via hadith). The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa is justifying this wet dream in this way and how he is inferring that MGA is superior to Allah (naozobillah). The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa also argued that is some ways, Allah can become the Sun and the prophet can become the moon and vice versa. The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa then argued that this is the stage of fana fillah.

Continue reading ““Hazrat Amir ul Munafiqeen’s fresh wet dream”—Al Fazal March 20, 1947”

Zainab Ilyas wife of Zain Inam resident of Chak Number RB 266 Tehsil Jaranwala District Faisalabad, Punjab Pakistan has left Qadiani cult

Intro
Zainab Ilyas wife of Zain Inam resident of Chak Number RB 266 Tehsil Jaranwala District Faisalabad, Punjab Pakistan has left Qadiani cult and accepted Islam. She said she also believe that Mirza Ghulam Qadiani was a liar imposter and that Isa (as) and Imam Mahdi will appear near Qayamah and that the claims of Mirza in this regard are false.

In this regard, she has issued a written statement duly witnessed and signed by the officials of Alami Majlis Tahaffiz e khatm e Nabuwwat Pakistan which is attached with this post.

Continue reading “Zainab Ilyas wife of Zain Inam resident of Chak Number RB 266 Tehsil Jaranwala District Faisalabad, Punjab Pakistan has left Qadiani cult”

Another Ex-Ahmadi turned Christian (March-2026), Abbas Ahmad, the maternal grandson of BA Rafiq–ex-imam Al-Fazl Mosque in London

Intro
In this video, this guy (Abbas Ahmad a maternal grandson of BA Rafiq), full video can be found herein)(See him on TikTok too, @frommosquetocross) who didn’t give his name alleges that he was born a Qadiani-Ahmadi and has converted to Christianity now. Interestingly, he said his father was abusive, which led to him being homeless and committing sin.

–At 24:35, he met a Christian woman in 2021, had some relations with her and went to Church and almost became a Christian. But she was the wrong kind of Christian and it didn’t work out? However, she was all about the money and it turned Aboss Khan off from Christianity. He also says that GOD should have taken care of him if he really existed. Aboss Khan had 10 years of freedom.

–At 6:50, Abbas confesses that his father was abusing him on a daily basis. It was Ahmadiyya or nothing! His father didn’t care about him, only Ahmadiyya.

–At 25:55, Aboss Khan confesses that he was in a reliationship with a Christian woman for 6 years! However, this contradicts his entire story. What years was this? Aboss Khan alleges that this woman’s mother was only a Christian in name, however, she had crosses all over her house. Aboss Khan thought he was gonna spend the rest of his life with her. However, they took a vacation and he came back and it was over. He lost his cars, his dogs and his house and he got really angry with GOD. However, this contradicts his story that he gave up on God in 2011, this was many years later. After this happened, Aboss Khan confesses that he planned to move to Dallas, Texas and give his life to the devil, via smoking weed, drinking beer and etc.

His mother is Amatul Jameel, she was born in London. His father is Ijaz Ahmad Khan, son of Subedar Abd ul Ghafoor Khan of Topi of the Frontier Province. Subedar Sahib has, by the grace of God, served the Jamaat in various capacities. He had the honour of being a body guard of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih II for a number of years. Both Ijaz and Jameela have been blessed with five boys. The eldest, Iftikhar Ahmad Khan has married Rabia a daughter of his father’s sister. The second son is named Riaz Ahmad, the third son is named Ghalib Ahmad, the fourth son is named Abbas Ahmad and the youngest is named Ayaz Ahmad. They all live in Detroit. Ijaz Ahmad Khan works in the IT industry. He and his whole family are enthusiastic workers of the Jamaat.

On 3-12-26, Abbad Ahmad frantically messaged me on tiktok and begged me to remove this essay. He alleges that even though he had a 6-year relationship, he didn’t have pre-marital sex with this woman, he said she was black too.

Continue reading “Another Ex-Ahmadi turned Christian (March-2026), Abbas Ahmad, the maternal grandson of BA Rafiq–ex-imam Al-Fazl Mosque in London”

Ramadhan-2026 in Qadian, India

Intro
In Feb-Mar-2026, Ramadhan is being celebrated by Muslims all around the world. In Qadian, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s are forced to share Qadian with the Sikhs, who recently had their SANG programs wherein they walked through the Ahmadiyya Mohalla (neighborhood) and danced (See the clip on tiktok and Twitter). This is how the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s celebrate Ramadhan in Qadian in 2026.

Continue reading “Ramadhan-2026 in Qadian, India”

Did Fard cut a deal with U.S. intelligence agencies in 1929? To get out of jail and lead Black Moslems astray?

Intro
Via W.D. Fard‘s First Footsteps in America: The Trail in Oregon” (2025) Anton Batey and Kevin Morris found a case from 1927, i.e., The 1927 case of People v. Ford (81 Cal. App. 450). They referenced “The Pacific Reporter” 968.; Reports of Cases Determined in the Courts of Appeal of the State of California, vol. 81, Bancroft-Whitney, 1928, pp. 449-455. This case can be found herein at The Pacific reporter v.253, pages 966-968)(Dated Feb-23-1927)(See the scans in the below). 

However, in their research work, Anton Batey and Kevin Morris told the world that this case focuses on the Fard’s criminal appeal following his conviction for offering to sell narcotics alongside Donaldson (in 1926). This appeal, brought solely by Ford, highlights issues related to the sufficiency of evidence, the admissibility of co-defendant statements, and Ford’s apparent attempts to shift blame onto Donaldson. The dynamic between the two raises the possibility of a falling-out, particularly given Ford’s efforts to minimize his role and suggest Donaldson bore greater responsibility. One might speculate whether Ford resented Donaldson for failing to properly vet the undercover officer, ultimately leading to their arrest. The facts of the case reveal a coordinated effort between the two defendants. Donaldson, acting as the initial point of contact, negotiated with an undercover officer posing as a prospective narcotics buyer. Donaldson then introduced the officer to Ford at a restaurant owned and operated by Ford. During their meeting, Donaldson retrieved a newspaper wrapped package containing narcotics from Ford’s premises. Although Ford initially denied involvement, claiming the package was “a bundle of old laundry,” he later admitted his connection to it. The narcotics were seized by law enforcement and identified as heroin and morphine. A major point of contention in Ford’s appeal was the use of Donaldson’s statements made in his absence. Typically, such statements are inadmissible unless a conspiracy or partnership is clearly established. In this case, the court determined that the two men were indeed partners in the crime, as evidenced by their coordinated actions and Donaldson’s description of their agreement to split profits. As a result, Donaldson’s statements were deemed admissible because they furthered the objectives of their joint enterprise. Fard’s defense rested on d istancing himself from Donaldson. He argued that Donaldson acted independently and that the evidence linking him (Ford) to the crime was insufficient. His appeal also challenged the trial court’s refusal to grant a directed verdict in his favor, claiming there was no conclusive proof of his active participation. However, the appellate court found otherwise. Testimony from the undercover officer, Ford’s own admissions, and Donaldson’s statements presented a consistent narrative of Ford’s direct involvement. The evidence demonstrated that Ford not only facilitated the transaction but also stood to profit equally.

Continue reading “Did Fard cut a deal with U.S. intelligence agencies in 1929? To get out of jail and lead Black Moslems astray?”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑