Intro
The Mirza family are a group of sick people. MGA’s son, the famous Musleh Maud preyed on boys and girls. The British Government allowed him to do whatever he wanted. A few years ago, Fauzia Faizi did an interview wherein she described the inner workings of the Mirza family, Samina Khan, a German politician also weighed in. Fauzia Faizi also discussed how Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad was raping his own daughter and etc. Fauzia Faizi is the great grand daughter of a companion of MGA, Dr. Syed Abdus Sattar Shah. She is also the niece of Abd u Rehman Khadim (Author of Ahmadiyya Pocket Book). In 2021, a great-great grand-daughter of MGA accused the 5th Khalifa and his gang of admin as sexual predators and rapists.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________The family of Fauzia Faizi Continue reading “Fauzia Faizi confirms that the Mirza family is full of incest and rapists”
Intro
Dr. Salam (29 January 1926 – 21 November 1996) had allegiance to Ahmadiyya, he respected the religion of his father, he thus never challenged anything in Ahmadiyya, he also believed that his intelligence was based on a revelation of MGA (see Tajalliyyat-e-Ilahiyyah, pages 20-21), in fact, in 1979 at the Jalsa in Rabwah, Salam claimed that it was the prayers of MGA which helped him become a Nobel winner. His contributions to the 1979 Nobel Prize award seem to be plagiarized and a result of schmoozing. In fact, Sheldon Glashow (with whom Dr. Salam won the Nobel Prize with) directly accused of Dr. Salam of having no contribution. Interestingly, Salam never attempted to solve the scientific irregularities of the Ahmadiyya religion, like Yus Asaf and the eclipses.
Dr. Abdus Salam was a particle-physicist, which is the closest branch to Nuclear Physics (he explains it himself herein). Born in 1926, he was always a gifted student, there are many stories, he received his MA in Mathematics from the Government College University in 1946. That same year, he was awarded a scholarship (that was supposed to be given to the sons of poor farmers) to St John’s College, Cambridge the UK, where he completed a BA degree with Double First-Class Honours in Mathematics and Physics in 1949.
He then returned to Pakistan and began lecturing at the Government College and Punjab University, Lahore (1951- 1953). After the Ahmadiyya riots of 1953, Dr. Salam hated Pakistan, turned his back on Pakistan and left for Europe. Just a year later, he was hired by the United Nations, he was already schmoozing with the nuclear energy establishment via NATO. He was working as the Scientific Secretary, Geneva Conferences on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy in 1955 and 1958. This led Salam to be a Member, Atomic Energy Commission, Pakistan (1958-1974) by President Ayub Khan. In 1958, Dr. Abdus Salam met Sigvard Arne Eklund at the 2nd annual “Geneva Conferences on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy”, they made fast friends. In 1961, Sigvard Arne Eklund was named the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, a post that he held until 1981. This connection between Dr. Salam and Sigvard Arne Eklund proved fruitful for Salam, he was able to secure the funding needed for this ICTP in 1964. He worked with Ishrat Hussain Usmani. Salam and Usmani seem to have had a nuclear reactor built in Pakistan by the Canadian Government. Some other great Pakistani physicist’s were Nazir Ahmed, Ishfaq Ahmad Khan, Iqbal Hussain Qureshi and Abdul Qadeer Khan.
In 1962, Salam met a very young Physics student, Louise Dame Napier Johnson. Attending an antinuclear proliferation meeting in London in 1962, Salam had met Louise Johnson, then a physics undergraduate at University College London (UCL), who was helping with the meeting’s
administration. It was what the French call un coup de foudre, an emotional lightning strike, such as Salam had not experienced since seeing the inaccessible Urmilla at Government College, Lahore, some twenty years before. Louise was only 20 years old, and Salam was 36. It should be noted that Ahmadiyya literature never mentions his second wife (girlfriend) and those circumstances (see the Al-Nahl of 1997, which has 200+ pages of data on Dr. Salam, however, they barely mention his second wife and those 2 amazing kids, see page 200, it is nevertheless from a Pakistani newspaper). Dr. Dame Louise Napier Johnson was never his wife, instead a life-long girlfriend. Allegedly, a few years later, he had an ahmadi-mullah read the Nikkah. His son was born in 1974 (Umar) and a daughter was born in 1982 (Saeeda). Both of these children are shunned by the Ahmadiyya Movement.
In 1964, with funding from the United Nations, Dr. Abdus Salam opened the ICTP. Recently, Qaiser Raja did a really expose’ of Dr. Abdus Salam and his shenanigans via Paul Dombey. In terms of being a schmoozer, Dr. Abdus Salam used ICTP’s fund to woo members of the Nobel Prize committee, like Paul Dirac and Waller, with all expense paid trips to Trieste. In fact, Waller visited every single summer for about 10 years, all expenses paid. Paul Dirac even had his birthday celebrated therein (1972) via huge parties wherein most likely alcohol was consumed and food was thrown around lavishly. In fact, the entire idea of the ICTP seems to be a scam to steal scientist from developing countries and use them in the West accordingly. But why were they wasting money on such lavishness? Nevertheless, it worked out for Dr. Abdus Salam, he used the ICTP to fraternize with other famous physicists like Werner Heisenberg, Eugene Paul Wigner, Hans Albrecht Bethe, Hendrik Casimir and Rudolf Peierls. Dr. Abdus Salam also revealed that by the mid 1980’s, the USA, UK and others (NATO) were against the ICTP.
From 1971 until 1978, Paul Dirac nominated Dr. Abdus Salam for the Nobel Prize on various accounts. In 1976, Erik Wilhelm Hulthén became the head of the Nobel Prize Committee and Salam devised a scheme that most likely land him the Nobel Prize. Dr. Salam even jokingly prayed to God for success in his diabolical scheme. Frank Close even tells a stories wherein Dr. Salam was dying to be associated with Weinberg and his theories. Yet again, in 1978, Paul Dirac wrote a letter of Recommendation and nominated Dr. Abdus Salam to win a Nobel Prize.
Nevertheless, per the order of his Khalifa, he worked for Pakistan and Italy simultaneously and as an esteemed College Professor at Cambridge. However, after Ahmadi’s were declared Non-Muslim in 1974, he left his job with the Pakistani government and began to focus on his school of Physics in Trieste, Italy. Oct 1974 to late 1978 seems to be a dead era in his career.
In 1979, he won the Nobel Prize in Physics. In 1979, the President of Pakistan and head military dictator, Zia ul Haq invited Dr. Salaam to Pakistan and gave him full presidential treatment, they asked him to build a center of Physics, he was wined and dined, nevertheless, he still left Pakistan in 1980 and continued to work for Italy.
In 1990, via the Muslim Sunrise of the 3rd Quarter, a speech of Dr. Abdus Salam from 1984 is reproduced. This was a speech allegedly given by Dr. Abdus Salam in Paris, France, in a meeting wherein “Islam and the West” was being discussed, at the UNESCO house on April-27-1984. In this speech, Dr. Abdus Salam quoted 88:17 of the Quran, however, it seems to be portions of 88:17 to 88:20. Dr. Abdus Salam also quoted 3:188 (3:189 in the Kadiani Koran) and portions of 3:189 (3:190 in the Kadiani Koran). Dr. Abdus Salam argued that Muslims scientist had already discovered much of what the Europeans had recently discovered. Dr. Salam quoted Ibn Khaldun, Al-Biruni, Ibn-i-Sina, Ibn-al-Haitham, Ibn Rushd, and connected Al-Ghazzali to the decline in Islamic sciences. He even quoted Chapter 2:1-3 of the Quran. Dr. Salam mentioned Einstein as the greatest physicist of all time and Heisenberg, he also mentioned Galileo.
Eventually, he died in 1996 of a rare brain disease wherein he had become a mute and at the house of his 2nd wife. Polygamy in the UK was illegal, hence, his second wife, Dr. Johnson was more like a lifelong girlfriend in British law. Abdus Salaam’s son, Ahmad Salaam, recently gave an interview herein wherein he discusses his father.
Continue reading “Dr. Abdus Salam liked white women, alcohol and a busy British lifestyle”
Intro
In 2026 (May-7), Musleh Shanboor streamed with other Ahmadiyya mullahs on the “Ask Islam” youtube channel. At 21:51 timestamp, Musleh Shanboor explains how 22:39-40 of the Quran (22:40-42 in the Kadiani Koran) doesn’t apply in MGA’s time and up until 2026. Musleh Shanboor means to say that the conditions to “take-up-arms” against a government haven’t been fulfilled. At 24:57, Musleh Shanboor says that Mirza Masroor Ahmad has allowed Ahmadi’s to call the plight of Muslims in this era (2015 to 2026) as Jihad. Musleh Shanboor called what Muslims are defending in Gaza as a “sort of Jihad“, however, it is not religious (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Musleh Shanboor then alleges that 100,000+ Muslims have converted to Christanity in India-Pakistan, however, this is a lie, most of the converts came from the choora caste of people, this is totally proven.
However, Musleh Shanboor forgets that MGA abrogated (mansukh) 22:39-40 of the Quran (22:40-41 in the Kadiani Koran) in his book, “The British government and Jihad” and had it published on May 22, 1900. MGA and his team of writers argued that this commandment (22:40) was specific to the period and time. It was not forever. It applied during the time when those entering the fold of Islam were being slaughtered like sheep and lambs (See pages 6-7). Musleh Shanboor also failed to mention that on page 17, MGA said he came with an order “jihad with the sword has ended from this time forward”. This statement and the context tell us that MGA was alleging that the violent Jihad which is found in 22:40 of the Quran (22:41 in the Kadiani Koran) was stopped on May-22-1900.
Musleh Shanboor also didn’t take into consideration how a few months later (Dec-15), MGA said, that in the time of “Maseeh Mau`ood” the command for jihaad was entirely abolished/stopped (see Nuzhat Haneef, page 171)(RK, v. 17, p. 443; marginal note; Arba`een Number 4)(See page 145, online English edition of Arba‘in).
Musleh Shanboor also didn’t mention how MGA argued in 1901-1902, that from this day, the human jihaad that was performed with the sword [i.e., martial jihaad], has been stopped by the command of God. Now after this whoever lifts a sword against a kaafir and refers to himself as a ‘ghaazee’ [a jihaad participant who is not martyred], he disobeys that Noble Messenger, the blessings of Allaah and peace be on him, who stated thirteen hundred years ago that upon the coming of the Maseeh Mau`ood the jihaads of the sword will come to an end. So now after my appearance there is no jihaad of the sword. … The one who fights evil with evil is not from among us. Save yourself from attack by the mischievous. But do not yourselves engage in mischievous confrontation.” (See RK, v. 16, pp. 28-29; starts at 5th line from bottom of p. 28; Appendix to Khutbah-e-Ilhaamiyyah, translation by Nuzhat Haneef).
Musleh Shanboor didn’t mention how in 1906, MGA and his team of writers alleged that God had nor forbidden the kind of Jihad wherein there is a battle of swords or guns. (See “Fountain of Christianity” (Chashma-e-Masihi), online English edition page 4). MGA said that the type of Jihad wherein swords and guns are used in battle is the final battle between light and darkness. MGA says that the type of Jihad wherein swords and guns are used in battle was destined to be abolished in the time of the Promised Messiah (maseeh-e-maud) as referred to the by the Holy Quran and Sahih Bukhari.
Musleh Shanboor also didn’t mention how in 1906, MGA and his team alleged that the famous hadith which talk about the breath of the Messiah killing people (See Sahih Muslim 2937a) is really about the plague and Earthquakes which will happen as a result of the rejection/abuse/denial of MGA as the Messiah (See Divine Manifestations [Tajalliyat-e-illahiyyah], page 9, online English Edition)(published in 1922). On page 9 of the Online English Edition, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s purposely mistranslated “abrogated” (mansookh) as “suspended”, thus proving that MGA did indeed “abrogate” Jihad, however, Ahmadi’s (Lahori and Qadiani) both agreed against MGA and landed on the idea that MGA only “suspended” Jihad in the 1900-1908 era.
Intro
Humanity First International is a front company for the Mirza family also called simply as Humanity First. They are using it to funnel their profits out of coffers in the UK via the AMJI.
In 1994, Mirza Tahir Ahmad registered Humanity First in London, UK.
In 2026, Humanity First has “Special Consultative Status” with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations.
Top officers of the charity are:
Chairman of the Board of Trustees—Ahmad Yahya Sayed
Vice Chairman—Mirza Mahmood Ahmed
Vice Chairman–Naseer Dean
Trustee and Senior Vice Chairman—Dr. Shabbir Ahmad Bhatti
Trustee—Baba F. Trawally
Trustee—Munum Naeem
Trustee—Mr. Muzaffar Ahmad
Trustee—Chris Edwards
Trustee—Bilal Atkinson
Trustee—Muhammad Hammad Harter
Trustee—Rafiq Hayat
Intro
In 2026, (12:29 time stamp) Mirza Masroor Ahmad encouraged German Ahmadi’s to do “ilzami-jawab” in politics, specifically vs. Israel and the USA (and via religious discussions). Mirza Masroor Ahmad implied that Ahmadi’s should avoid 33:70 of the Quran (33:71 in the Kadiani Koran) and not speak a straight word. Instead, Mirza Masroor Ahmad teaches Ahmadiyya behavior. He tells Ahmadi’s to create a social media cell (aka Ahmadiyya troll farm) and make clips about the opponents of Ahmadiyya and do “ilzami-jawab” (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter).
Moreover, in 61:2 of the Quran (61:3 in the Kadiani Koran), Allah tells Muslims to stop saying to people what they themselves don’t do, in other words, don’t be a hypocrite. Furthermore, Ahmadi’s are hypocrites of the highest order, in fact, they always ask their opponent to give Fatwa’s of Kufr (23:19 timestamp), however, they never give them and avoid them altogether (See the famous London Debate).
Intro
In 2026 (May-1), on an episode of “This Week with Huzoor” (13:54 time stamp), an Ahmadi stated that Ahmadi’s are allowed to refinance their homes in America, however, his question was about using that money to give to a Ahmadiyya Mosque-temple project (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). The questioner is Moeez Momin from Majlis Ansarullah from the Gulf States Region in the USA.
Mirza Masroor Ahmad states that his opinion was that an Ahmadi can only use a mortgage in America for the house wherein they wish to live (for your own use), not to be used as a business (or an attempt to make money off of buying and renting out and then selling). Ironically, this is exactly what a few of my uncle’s did. Mirza Masroor Ahmad then says that quite a number of Ahmadi’s have gotten loans after “revaluating” their homes and have given that money towards an Ahmadi mosque-temple project. Mirza Masroor Ahmad says that since Ahmadi’s get loans to build their house bigger and etc., why not give some of that money to an Ahmadiyya mosque-temple project? in the end, Mirza Masroor Ahmad says that if you like, you can, but don’t overburden yourself (also consider your repayment capacity). In the end, Moeez Momin was clarified that even giving money to an Ahmadiyya mosque-temple via “re-mortgage” (is this refinance?) is permissible via Mirza Masroor Ahmad, as long as those funds are not exclusively used for a property, there must be a note.
Intro
Just a few days ago, Khurram Shah was on TikTok and backbiting to some Ahmadi’s and he was talking about his sisters. Khurram Shah hates his sisters and isn’t allowed into their homes and vice versa. However, on the books, they are all technically Ahmadi. So what’s the issue? Khurram Shah also confessed in the past that he hates his youngest sister and even spoke negatively about her on social media.
Furthermore, Khurram was trying to convince Ahmadi’s that #Ahmadiyyafactcheckblog has bad character and hasn’t remarried, however, Khurram’s own daughter is at home, divorced and with a baby girl. Why does Khurram Shah talk like this? Easy! Ahmadiyya is a behavior wherein cowardice is taught.
I have the video’s saved and Raoof saw it too.
Intro
Just yesterday, Qadiani’s with approval from their Khalifa showed up in London somewhere and began selling their stupid arguments. The Bashir-AIN kid said MGA’s name with Salawat which caused Yusuf to say “Lanaat” on MGA (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). The other Ahmadi kid is this nerd named Faisal Bhutter, he literally knows nothing only his talking points.
Ahmadi’s get caught lying about Ibn Abbas (ra) on the alleged death of Eisa (as). Muslims in the UK found a statement from Ibn Abbas in Ibn Kathir (ra) on 4:159, Iba Abbas (ra) said that before the death of Eisa (as), Jews and Christians will believe in Eisa (as), inferring that Eisa (as) hasn’t died yet (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter).
Continue reading “Yusuf vs. Bashir AIN—MGA will be cursed if they send “salawat” in-front of us”
Intro
In 2026, water in Qadian is mixed with either feces or simply dirt. Why can’t the Qadiani’s change this?
Intro
K. Hashmi on FB (via Sohail Ahmad Dirvi) is reporting how a man named Arshad, his wife and 7 children, residents of Fateh Garh, Lahore, Pakistan, have quit the Qadiani cult and have reverted to Islam. He took Shahadah at the hand of Qari Rafiq.
Part-1 of the debate, FULL REVIEW, is MGA greater than Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah) #Qadianismontrial
Intro
In Part-1 of the #Londondebate (#Qadianismontrial), Qadiani-Ahmadi’s have fully turned into “Lahori-Ahmadi’s” and denying MGA’s claim of being the literal 2nd coming of Muhammad (Saw) via Buruz and “The LAST PROPHET” (check out my video too). Instead, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s are claiming that MGA was only speaking in a “metaphoric-spiritual” manner, however, that is the Lahori-Ahmadi position (See the writings of Maulvi Muhammad Ali). Ahmadi’s refused cross examination in this debate, which means they lost before it even started (see the clip on Twitter). The Ahmadi Maulvi team refused to give fatwa’s, however, they kept asking us for fatwa’s, the Quran is against this! This is hypocrisy (See 61:2 of the Quran). Lastly, in this debate, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s have taken the position of the “Lahori-Ahmadi’s” and are claiming that MGA was only a prophet in a metaphoric sense, the claim of “Muhammad and Ahmad”, the 2nd coming of Muhammad (Saw) and the “Khatam ul Anbiya” (See Maulvi Muhammad Ali, “Prophethood in Islam”, 1915, pages 422, 435 and 15, 21 and 25).
As part of his opening statement, Bro Imtiaz mentioned how Ahmadi’s believe that looking at the face of MGA is like looking at the face of Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah)(See Al-Badr, Oct-25, 1906 and the Al-Fazl of Aug-13-1944, See also the 1974 NA proceedings page 785, pdf page 410). If you want to see Muhammad (Saw), look at MGA at Qadian (naozobillah). This was also stated by the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad.
Bro Imtiaz also mentioned how MGA argued that he would die in the grave of Muhammad (Saw). In 1909, MGA alleged that God Almighty has entered me in Muhammad’s (saw) being, in everything, without even letting it (from me) to have a different name or a different grave (See RK-18, page 381, Nuzul Maseeh)(See pages 297-298, online English Edition). MGA also argued that from the hadith, it is clearly derived that in the end times, Prophet Muhammad (saw) will also appear in the world (See RK-18, page 384)(See page 300, online English Edition).
Bro Imtiaz explained how in 1902, MGA said that the truth is that the spiritual power of the holy Prophet (SAW) at the end of the 6th thousand (13th century in Mirza Ghulam), i.e. these days, is MUCH STRONGER, MORE COMPLETE and STRONGER than in THOSE EARLY YEARS. Nay, it is like the fourteenth (moonlit) night (full moon)(Khutbah Ilhamiya RK 16:271)(See also Kalimatul Fasl, pg. 147). MGA also said, Islam was a crescent at the time of Muhammad (Saw), but now it is like a full moon (Khutbah Ilhamiya RK 16:275). In 1902, MGA said that the person who makes a difference between MGA and Muhammad (Saw) has neither seen me nor recognized MGA (See Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, RK, V16, P. 258 – 259). MGA also claimed to be the FINAL BRICK of the prophets (See RK-16, Pg 178, Khutba-e-Ilhamiah). MGA claimed that in the palace of prophets, one brick was left (See Rk-16, Pg 177, Khutba-e-Ilhamiah and via Bro Imtiaz). MGA also claimed that the time of the manifest victory of the era of the holy Prophet has expired, and the second victory which was to be much greater and clearer then the first one had yet to be achieved. It was ordained that its time should fall during the times of the promised Masih (See Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, pages 193-194, and via RK16, p.288)(See Al-Badr, Oct-25, 1906 and the Al-Fazl of Aug-13-1944, See also the 1974 NA proceedings page 785, pdf page 410).
Ibrahim Ikhlaf in a nutshell: “Your 2 mins = Our 8 mins… or debate over.” “Moderator issue? End the debate right now.” “Livestream issue? Comply or leave.” “Cross-examination? Absolutely not- debate is over.
In 1902, MGA was arguing that the spirituality (ruhaniyyat) of Muhammad (saw) radiated in a complete manner (pooree)(See RK, v. 16, pp. 266 (Khutbah ilhamia). Our Muslim brother @Seeker2.0 on TikTok explains how when Razi read he left out the word “pooree” (fully or complete manner)(See on Tiktok herein too).
