ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
We have stated this many many times on this blog and in video’s, the Ahmadiyya Movement is global non-profit corporation that is robbing governments blind of tax dollars. These are allowed in capitalism, and since the end of WW-2, they have been allowed to spread around the world, the Ahmadiyya Movement hides money overseas in tax havens like Panama. Recently, the 5th estate youtube channel published a video wherein it exposed the financial misgivings of the Global Mormon Church and its business ventures around the world.

In the video posted in the below, Mormon whistle blowers (ex-Mormon’s). The video claims that there are 17 million Mormons worldwide with 200k in Canada alone. Nevertheless, the Mormon church is one of the most richest non-profit corporations in the world. The Mormon church has engaged in large-scale tax evasion. They recently sent 100 million Canadian dollars to the USA under a gift was given to Brigham Young University (BYU)(which was 70% of the tithing money received in 2016 from Canada). The Mormon Church operates 300 temples in 74 countries. Since 1985, the Mormon church claims that it has given away 3 billion dollars in humanitarian aid. Mormons are forced to pay 10% tithe (chanda), this is where this money has come from. Mormon leaders even tell Mormons to not spend money on food and instead pay the tithe.

Lars Nielsen is another ex-Mormon and he confirms the Mormon fraud. He talks about 100 million Canadian dollars to the USA under a gift was given to Brigham Young University (BYU). Lars Nielsen (and Mark Kelley) explain how the tax code in Canada won’t allow any charity to transfer million of dollars to another church in the USA, thus, Mormon execs. looked for a loophole to get the 100 million dollars from Canada to the USA, and they found it, and thus gave it to their own charity. Even if there is one student at BYU who is originally Canadian, if they can prove that they helped even one student, than the 100 million will be overlooked. By 2016-2018, less than 2% of the population of students at BYU were Canadian. In total, Mormons from Canada have given 1 billion dollars to the Canadian Mormon Church who then gave it to BYU, this costed the Canadian treasury 280 million Canadian Dollars in tax breaks. The Mormon church responded to 5th estate and claimed that what it did was legal. Since 2007, 46% of tithing money was sent to the USA, not spent in Canada. Since 2007, the Mormon church in Canada has donated 1 billion dollars to Brigham Young University.

Ryan McKnight is an ex-Mormon and created the website Mormon leaks,

Continue reading “Just like #Ahmadiyya, the Mormon church is running a ponzi scheme” →

Intro
In Oct. of 2022, his son committed suicide in a hostel at National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST) in Islamabad, Pakistan. He is the son of Mirza Khursheed Ahmad (grandson of MGA through Mirza Aziz Ahmad).

Allegedly, he went to medical school from 1974–1981 at Abbotabad Public School, he got a bachelors degree in medicine, bachelor of surgery (MBBS), DCH, FCPS Pediatrics.

He seems to have authored a few books, Author of
1. Silsala Ahmadiyya vol.2
2. Silsala Ahmadiyya vol. 3
3.Khasusi Committee mein kya guzri

Continue reading “Who is Dr. Mirza Sultan Ahmad?” →

Intro
Reports are coming out of whatsapp groups explaining how Nida’s nephew (named Murtaz Aziz by NUST)(technically, the son of her cousin (Dr. Mirza Sultan Ahmad, a child specialist at Fazl e Omar Hospital-Rabwah) has committed suicide at National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST) in Islamabad, Pakistan. Rana Tanveer has tweeted this also. The Rabwah darul Hijrat twitter handle has also tweeted this. Rumors are swirling to the effect that the Mirza family may have pushed to have him kill himself since he knew about the sexual misgivings of his father and the Mirza family at Rabwah. The family seems to have already buried the body and thus, there will be no further investigation.

Who is Dr. Mirza Sultan Ahmad? He is the son of Mirza Khursheed Ahmad, a great-grandson of MGA. This makes Nida’s nephew the great-great-grandson of MGA.

Continue reading “Nida’s nephew, the son of Dr. Mirza Sultan Ahmad (child specialist at Fazl e Omar Hospital-Rabwah) has committed suicide” →

Intro
It seems that MGA was mentioned in The Theosophist newspaper in 1886. The Theosophist is the monthly journal of the international Theosophical Society based in Adyar, India. It was founded in India in 1879 by Helena Blavatsky, who was also its editor. The journal is still being published till date. For the year 1930, the journal was published in Hollywood, California by Annie Besant and Marie Russak Hotchener, but it returned to Adyar in 1931. The journal features articles about philosophy, art, literature and occultism.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was mentioned in The Theosophist in 1886” →

Intro
KTV is reporting that the 2022 Khatme Nubuwwat Conference in Rabwah, Pakistan has concluded and it was peaceful. This has been an annual conference now for 31 years, it is held in Muslim Colony, Rabwah, Pakistan. Many Ahmadi’s have reverted to Islam through this conference and its efforts. 

Continue reading “The 2022 Khatme Nubuwwat Conference in Rabwah, Pakistan” →

Intro
The ROR of April-1937 seems to have an essay by Mohammad Husain (B. Com) entitled, “The Revolt of Modern Youth” (Part-1). They quoted Dr. Annie Besant and her disparaging remarks on feminism and how it leads to prostitution. The ROR of June-1937 has “The Revolt of Modern Youth” (Part-1), again by Mohammad Husain (B. Com).

Continue reading “Was the Ahmadiyya Movement against feminism in 1937?” →

Intro
This entire entry was taken from the islam_Ahmadiyya reddit forum. Cutting hands and stoning is also discussed in the ROR of Sep-1937.

It is common practice within Ahmadiyya to interpret and reinterpret verses until it fits with common sense and what appeals to us. Of course “this was what it meant all along” /s. However, in the following video, the 4th Caliph of Ahmadiyya seem to disagree with this practice.

The video explains why the Quran should be taken as is, and the cutting of limbs should not be defended or reinterpreted to mean something else. The full transcript is available at the bottom of this post.

To me, the 2 most important take-aways are:

1. “Why did this (alternative) meaning not strike him ( the Holy Prophet)”;

2. “So 1 should not defend Allah where Allah does not want to be defended. Whatever the holy Quran is, it should be taken as such”

From this we have to ask: how does one know what Allah wants defended? Even one of the most outrageous teachings of Islam, the cutting of one’s hands should one steal, is not to be defended. So what does Allah want people to defend?

And if a meaning did not strike the Holy Prophet when it could have, should it always be discarded? Should every interpretation of Ahmadiyya be subject to this filter?

When half of the things in the quran are said to be metaphorical, those are among the most important questions that should be asked.

Interpretation should be justified. And something simply being untrue is not reason enough to reinterpret it. Its possible that the untrue thing is simply that. A mistake in the Quran.

The Transcript of the 1min :19s video on alislam.org called “Could the Quranic injunction of severing a thief’s hand be interepreted metaphorically?” is as follows:

“””Some of these Muslim scholars have taken that attitude, particularly [some name] saheb, have translated the Quran as such that “put them out of circulation.” some say it also means imprisonment. Some say “Leave them incapable of stealing again.” How? That is not suggested.

But they are all just defensive means. The fact is that this verse was better understood by Hazrat Muhammad Mustafa saw, and he never understood it to be carrying the meaning of putting somebody out of circulation or imprisoning or whatever they say. So why did this meaning not strike him? That is the most striking thing about it.

So 1 should not defend Allah where Allah does not want to be defended. Whatever the holy Quran is, it should be taken as such. And if it does not appeal to anybody, let Allah deal with them. Why should we try to defend Allah beyond our own limitations. We have our limitations and we should not transgress those limitations.”””

The longer video clip is:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbqCr1-85mk&t=7s

Continue reading “Cutting off the Hands of Thieves should not be defended or reinterpreted- 4th Caliph of Ahmadiyya | the validity of reinterpreting the quran according to the 4th Caliph” →

Intro
This entire entry was taken from the islam_Ahmadiyya reddit forum.

Around this time of the year, every year without fail, there is a campaign by the Jamaat to tell people to stay away from Halloween and all its adornments as it is truly un-islamic, satanic and a shirk. I quote a portion of a Friday sermon whereby belief in the supernatural has been declared as terribly wrong.

Friday Sermon, October 29, 2010 Translated by Alislam, reproduced as is.

“”The message of Halloween is thus of existence of witches, evil spirits and satanic worship. It is extremely wrong to ‘believe in’ things that are ‘supernatural’ even if it is for fun. For this reason, our children should strictly avoid them.””

While we are told in strong words that belief in these supernatural beings is against the very essence of Islam, we find that Ahmadiyya history records direct interactions with demons and jinns. It describes people who are possessed and can attain superhuman powers while being possessed. We find that many saints of the Jamaat were actively involved in exorcisms. In fact we find that at least one Jamaat elder who was a companion of the promised Messiah was well known and very well respected among the supernatural beings. In fact he had been given the title of “The Emerald of Solomon” by the demons and the jinns. This reference to Solomon is linked to the Quran which tells us that jinns had been made subservient to Solomon.

I have translated four pages of the autobiography of this companion of the promised Messiah whereby these incidents are described in pretty vivid detail. The reference is from Hayat-e-Qudsi, The Autobiography of Maulana Ghulam Rasul Rajeki, Pages 620 to 623, Translated by me.

Continue reading “The Emerald of Solomon, Ahmadiyyat and Halloween” →

Intro
It seems that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad never quoted Mulla Ali Qari, nor did Noorudin. In 1913, an Ahmadiyya newspaper quoted Mullah Ali Qari in terms of the end of prophethood. However, after Noorudin died in 1914, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s began their war with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. In 1915, the 2nd Khalifa published 2 books, “Qaul al Fasl” (Jan-1915) and “Haqiqat un Nubuwwat” (Mar-1915), in these books, the 2nd Khalifa and his team of writers quoted Mulla Ali Qari and his comments on the end of prophethood. Maulvi Muhammad Ali (President of the Lahori-Ahmadi’s) immediately responded with his book, “Prophethood in Islam” (Dec-1915). Maulvi Muhammad Ali exposed the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s as academically dishonest and desperate. It seems that Maulvi Muhammad Ali didn’t address the quotes that the Qadiani’s were giving via Mulla Ali Qari, thus, in 1922, he had “Akhri Nabi” (The Last Prophet) published. In this book, he specifically addressed the Qadiani quotations via Mulla Ali Qari (starting on page 40).

In 1922, Maulvi Muhammad Ali tells us that the Qadiani’s quoted “Mozuat-E-Kabeer” aka “Encyclopedia of Hadith forgeries”. Ahmadi’s have quoted books of hadith forgery before, see the case of Aisha (ra) and her comments on the end of prophethood. However, Maulvi Muhammad Ali doesn’t mention that the book Qadiani’s are mentioning is a book of fake hadith. He does however, refute the Qadiani’s and their assertions. Secondly, we have posted a scan of the book cover and the relevant page in the below which proves that this hadith is a fake, since it also claims that Eisa (As), Khidr, Idris (as) and Elijah (as) are still alive. Thus, the entire line of argumentation via the Qadiani’s is totally refuted. This argument was also presented in the ROR of Sep-1937.

Furthermore, in the famous commentary of Fiqhul Akbar, Mulla Ali Qari says re 42:13 Allaah ﷻ began with Nooh AS because he is the first of the messengers and then mentioned Muhammad ﷺ because he is the last of the prophets. On p106 he mentions a hadeeth that says Muhammad ﷺ was the first of the prophets to be created and the last of the prophets to be sent. On p251 above, he says that those claiming prophethood ought to be given the death penalty, they are liars deceivers outside the bounds of the Qur-aan and sunnah. He also says that Eesaa AS will descend before the day of judgement as one of its signs before the last hour, and then will die, to be buried next to the prophet Muhammad ﷺ. He provided Qur-aan & hadeeth for all these points. Finally, their own screenshot proves that there could be no prophet after Muhammad ﷺ since his own baby son could NOT live on to reach the age of prophethood, because the line of prophethood is terminated with the by Muhammad ﷺ, the terminator. One of the meanings of khaatam!

The Qadiani’s were refuted in terms of Mulla Ali Qari via “The Golden Maxims in Refutation of Qādiyānism” by Maulānā Manzūr Ahmad Chiniotī in 2020, check that out also. In 1965, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s quoted Mulla Ali Qari as they beefed with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. Even in the Qadiani pocketbook, “Beacon of Truth”, Mulla Ali Qari is quoted. Bashir Ahmad Rafiq, the famous Qadiani missionary in the UK also quoted Mulla Ali Qari.

The Golden Maxims-1

Continue reading “#Ahmadis embarrass themselves by quoting Mulla Ali Qari” →