Intro
Tipsters have been sending me info about the younger brother of Sabah Ahmedi, @theyoungimam. Tipsters allege that has been rapping and talks about lewd situations with women and drugs.
Intro
In 2026 (Jun), @freepalestine20252025 (now as @khatim.info) engaged with @battaeclipse, just before the debate, @battaeclipse said in a boastful and rude way in Urdu that he was gonna have fun (muzza, 2:10 time stamp and 3:35) with @freepalestine20252025 (now working as @khatim.info), however, by the end of the discussion, he was crying about his English running out. @battaeclipse’s claim at the beginning was that the sahaba said that there will be a “new” prophet”. This was also his main argument in this discussion.
Firstly, @battaeclipse quoted the famous set of hadith wherein the death of Ibrahim (ra), the son of Muhammad (saw) is recorded and related by Anas bin Malik (Bukhari 1303). However, the matter of prophethood was not discussed in this hadith. @freepalestine20252025 (now as @khatim.info) then quoted Bukhari 6194, which is an extended version of the same hadith, however, the narrators are different, they are Ismail and Abi `Aufa. In this extended version Abi `Aufa, who is a sahaba, clearly said that the son of Muhammad (Saw) only died because there is NO prophet after Muhammad (saw). Thus proving that the sahaba didn’t believe that any NEW person would be granted prophethood.
At one point, @battaeclipse tried to divert the conversation from “is there a new prophet after Muhammad (Saw), to what is the meaning of “La Nabiya Badi”.
At another point, @battaeclipse tried to divert the conversation and forced @freepalestine20252025 (now as @khatim.info) to discuss if some sahaba will go to Hell or not.
Half way through the discussion, a new Ahmadi came on (with better English, cough cough), and said that Ahmadi’s don’t have to follow the sahaba, and in Ahmadiyya theology, some of the sahaba will go to Hell.
@freepalestine20252025 (now as @khatim.info) argued that per 9:100 of the Quran (9:101 in the Kadiani Koran), he follows the Sahaba in their goodness.
Close to the end, @battaeclipse was asking for a Fatwa.
Intro
In 2026, at the recent “new Ahmadi’s” Ijtema in the UK, barely 10 Ahmadi converts can be seen. This proves that there is NO growth of Ahmadiyya in WEST.
Continue reading “Barely 10 converts to Ahmadiyya in the UK in 2025-2026”
Intro
Check out Bro Imtiaz’s video on this herein. In 1900-1901, MGA began claiming prophethood, this started in “Arba‘in” and continued onward. MGA was discreetly claiming prophethood (See also “Haqiqat un Nubuwwat”,1915, tabdili aqida). Soon thereafter, MGA claimed to have gotten his prophethood from Muhammad (Saw) and is the 2nd coming of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah). However, after 1902, MGA began claiming to be greater than Muhammad (saw). In 1914, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s split from the Qadiani’s and alleged that MGA was only “metaphorically” the 2nd coming of Muhammad (Saw) and his prophethood was also only “metaphoric”. The Qadiani’s disagreed and called it the “Ummati-Nabi“. However, after 1947, the Qadiani’s have moved away from this belief and have adopted the Lahori-Ahmadi position (that MGA was the metaphoric second coming of Muhammad [saw]{naozobillah}).
In 1900, MGA gave “his” definition of a law-bearing “Rasul” as someone who “based on his wahi, lays down some commandments to do things and other commandments prohibiting things and establishes regulations for his people”. MGA then says that his own wahi also has “permissions and prohibitions” (just like that of a law-bearing Rasul). MGA says that his God has named his teachings and Wahi, like that comes to me as FALAK (Boat)….thus, see, God has declared my revelations, my teachings and my allegiance to be Noah’s Ark and as the basis of salvation for all human beings. Let him who has eyes see and him who has ears hear (See Arba‘in, RK-17-Urdu, page 435)(See also page 133-134 (of the English edition).
In 1900, MGA said this is not the time to manifest Muhammad (Saw)(Jalali-color), that event has already happened. Now people need the full light of the moon, some cooler, and that is me (MGA). MGA then quotes the famous sentence of 5:3 of the Quran (5:4 in the Kadiani Koran)(See Arba‘in, no. 4, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 17, pages 444-446).
In 1900, via “Jihad and the British Government” and via an announcement therein. On page-1 (page 29 of the book) of the announcement, MGA denied that he was Buruz like reincarnation, and he wasn’t actually the souls of both these holy men have reappeared in him was not true! You can listen to Maulvi Razi read it out herein. (“Kay suchmuch indo buzurg nabiyoon kee ruhain maray under khalool kargayain” Urdu). However, a few pages later MGA alleged that he was actually a combination of 2 souls (Muhammad [saw] and Eisa [as])(See the scan in the below) and a “blended compound (Majoon e Muraqqab) of the two (See page 35). It seems that MGA was lying! MGA was purposely denying the concept, which he accepted in total in Tohfa Golarvia.
In 1901 (Nov), in “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala“, MGA argued that he was the second coming of Muhammad (via Buruz), MGA said he was the Muhammad the 2nd (sanee) via Buruz.
In 1902, MGA said that the person who makes a difference between MGA and Muhammad (Saw) has neither seen me nor recognized MGA (See Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, RK, V16, P. 258 – 259). MGA also claimed to be the FINAL BRICK of the prophets (See RK-16, Pg 178, Khutba-e-Ilhamiah). MGA claimed that in the palace of prophets, one brick was left (See Rk-16, Pg 177, Khutba-e-Ilhamiah and via Bro Imtiaz). MGA also claimed that the time of the manifest victory of the era of the holy Prophet has expired, and the second victory which was to be much greater and clearer then the first one had yet to be achieved. It was ordained that its time should fall during the times of the promised Masih (See Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, pages 193-194, and via RK16, p.288).
In 1902, MGA was arguing that the spirituality (ruhaniyyat) of Muhammad (saw) radiated in a complete manner (pooree)(See RK, v. 16, pp. 266 (Khutbah ilhamia). Our Muslim brother @Seeker2.0 on TikTok explains how when Razi read he left out the word “pooree” (fully or complete manner)(See on Tiktok herein too).
In 1902, MGA said that the truth is that the spiritual power of the holy Prophet (SAW) at the end of the 6th thousand (13th century in Mirza Ghulam), i.e. these days, is MUCH STRONGER, MORE COMPLETE and STRONGER than in THOSE EARLY YEARS. Nay, it is like the fourteenth (moonlit) night (full moon)(Khutbah Ilhamiya RK 16:271). MGA also said, Islam was a crescent at the time of Muhammad (Saw), but now it is like a full moon (Khutbah Ilhamiya RK 16:275).
In 1902, a letter by Maulvi Abdul Karim is reproduced by the editor (Maulvi Muhammad Ali) of the ROR-Aug-1902 (see pages 306-336). The title/heading of the letter is given as “Muslim Resuscitation and The Means By Which It Can Be Brought Out”. This is a letter, which was written to the “Nudwat ul Ulema”, this was in response to their invitation to MGA to attend their annual Jalsa at Calcutta (Dec-1902). Maulvi Abdul Karim starts off with saying that he is looking out for Muslims and their welfare and yearns for Islam to dominate once again. Maulvi Abdul Karim gives a long speech and then finally says Muhammad (saw) is the best example of morals. He then presents MGA as the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah) and as a unifier for the Muslims in India. Maulvi Abdul Karim was critical of the Mutazalite‘s, and Sir Syed and his Aligarh College and that entire thrust of modernism and mixing it with Islam. Maulvi Abdul Karim then poses a question to the “Nudwat ul Ulema”, he asks as to who is the “perfect manifestation of the glory and attributes” of Muhammad (saw), Maulvi Abdul Karim then poses another question: “Who is it that claims to be Baruz? (representing the spiritual appearance) of the Great Arabian Prophet” (this is implying that MGA is the Baruz)(note by AFCB). Maulvi Abdul Karim then asks the “Nudwat ul Ulema” to point to anyone else that they had in mind who could fit as the 2nd coming of Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah)(see page 321). Maulvi Abdul Karim then gives a long speech on the objectives of the “Nudwat ul Ulema”. On page 328, Maulvi Abdul Karim tells how (and laments) all Muslims, from the Ahl-e-Hadith to the “Naichri” (the English word ‘nature’ pronounced like a desi)(Sir Syed type of Muslims) believe that prophethood has finished. Maulvi Abdul Karim does describe other means of communication by Allah and he could mean the good dreams (which are 1/46th of prophethood) and seems to be implying MGA’s prophethood. Maulvi Abdul Karim criticizes the “Nudwat ul Ulema” and says that they keep trying to unite Muslims and will never achieve that. Maulvi Abdul Karim mentions Dowie and calls him a crazy old man. On page 330, Maulvi Abdul Karim presents the common Ahmadi argument that since Islam is a living religion, and thus, that must also mean that Allah is still speaking and via miracles and signs. Maulvi Abdul Karim then argues that any religion that is devoid of Allah’s speech should be laughed at. Maulvi Abdul Karim then argues that it’s sad that the Jews were blessed with so many prophets, but not in Islam. On page 332, Maulvi Abdul Karim argued that the previous Jalsa failed. Maulvi Abdul Karim the quotes 62:3 and presents MGA as someone who fulfills this so-called prophecy and as the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah). On page 333, Maulvi Abdul Karim writes:
“””In other words, the wise and knowing God has raised Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian with the same spirit and power, the same blessings and favors and the same miracles, with which he raised the Holy Prophet. Since the same and even greater evils and corruption had appeared in the world, and the same teachings, the same sanctifying power, the same heavenly blessings, the same miracles, supernatural signs and grand prophecies were needed as at the time of the Holy Prophet, therefore, the God of jealousy and power has sent his true representative and perfect manifestation who has annihilated his own self in obedience to his Holy Master and tries day and night to re-establish his honor, glory and greatness, and he has given the same power and magnetism that the whole world may be replenished…..”
Continue reading “Did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claim to be the 2nd coming of Muhammad (Saw)?”
Intro
In 2026 (Jun), elections for local city council were held in Qadian. The Ahmadiyya Movement collectively voted for Gagandeep Singh Gunny Bhatia of the Ahali Dal Badal party, he mentioned them in his after getting elected blurb. He says he won by barely 150 votes.He didn’t mention which Mohalla he was representing.
Continue reading “Ahmadi’s in Qadian helped Gagandeep Singh Gunny Bhatia get elected in Jun-2026”
Intro
Firstly, Muslims don’t accept Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 (“”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“) as an authentic source, thus, this prayer and entire scenario was always disregarded by Muslims.
In 2026 (Jun), Bro Imtiaz streamed on TikTok with Amir Haq and explained how MGA alleged that Allah had decreed an accursed death for Eisa (as)(naozobillah), however, after Eisa (as) prayed (Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 (“”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“), Allah changed his decree and Eisa (as)(See 3:47:14 time stamp)(Via Malfuzat-5-Urdu, page 238)(dated as Aug-23-1903) was allowed to survive the crucifixion.
In 1882-1884, via “Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya” (See page 206 online English edition), MGA was criticizing Christianity and alleged that per the Gospel, the night before Eisa (as) was arrested, he kept repeating a certain prayer over and over again and hoping to avert his death (See Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34), however, this prayer was not accepted. MGA also calls the method of birth for an alleged God to be disrespectful, since the Christian God seems to have been a fetus and delivered through the birth channel (and somehow this is disrespectful for a God)(See BA-4, RK-1, page 441-Urdu)(See Bro Imtiaz, 3:51:19 time stamp). MGA also alleged to have received a revelation in Hebrew (“”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“)(See [Barahin-e-Ahmadiyyah, part 4, pp. 555–556 sub-footnote 4, RK, v1, pp. 662–664 sub-footnote 4–Urdu, See page 433, online English edition).
In 1890-1891, MGA argued that the prayer (Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“) of Jesus of the Bible was not heard—for it was irrevocably destined not be heard, and what power would a poor creature have before the definite will of the Creator!—still, upon the hope that it might be accepted, the Messiah (as) took the admission of his humility and submission to the extreme. If he had indeed known beforehand that his prayer would be rejected and would never be heard, would he have gone on praying all night till dawn? And would he still have fervently employed himself and his disciples in this vain exercise? Here the critic would agree that Jesusas was sure that only God knew and he knew not. Likewise, the reason why so many of Jesus’as prophecies turned out to be false was his ignorance of matters of the unseen, which caused him to misunderstand and misinterpret Divine prophecies (See “Three Questions by a Christian and their Answers”, pages 43-44, 64 and 10).
In 1893 (via Tohfa Baghdad, page 91), MGA alleged to have received a revelation “”O my Lord,
my Lord, why have You forsaken me?”” aka “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani””.
In 1894 (via Nur ul Haq, page 75), MGA indirectly quotes (Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“) and alleged that the Christian God was a ridiculous invention, MGA then mentioned how Jesus of the Bible died while saying, ‘My God! My God! Why have you forsaken me?’ Yet in spite of all this, he is a god and the son of God?
In 1895, MGA quoted Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 and alleged that Jesus of the Bible departed from this world in utter hopelessness, crying لما سبقتانی [lama sabachthani—why
have You forsaken me?] Even the Hindu god Ramchandra fared better than this ‘God’; he was able to take revenge against Ravan while still alive and did not stop until he had killed him. MGA criticized the God of Christians and opined, Was it an act of Divinity that he bawled his eyes out
for the whole night, yet his prayer went unanswered? He gave up the ghost crying Eli, Eli [my God, my God but the Father took no pity on him (See pages 51, 62, 109-110).
In 1900 (Apr-17), MGA argued that how can the Christians, who deify a humble, weak, powerless unsuccessful man, give anyone success? What fruits can a man give to others who pray, when his own night-long prayers were useless and in vain? How can a man who says: ‘Eloi, eloi, lama sabachthani,’ meaning, ‘O God! O God! Why hast thou forsaken me?’ and admits that God has abandoned him, join others with God? (See Al-Hakam, vol. 4, no. 14, dated 17 April 1900, pp. 2-9, via Malfuzat-2, online English edition, page 216).
In 1900 (Aug-9), MGA argued that how can someone (Jesus of the Bible) who cries over his own helplessness grant power and honour to anyone else? How can such a one hear the supplications of others, when his own cries and lamentations made throughout the night went in vain? A person who cried and shrieked ‘Eloi, eloi, lama sabachthani,’ meaning, ‘O God! O God! Why hast thou forsaken me?’ yet he was not heard. And to crown this all off, ultimately, the Jews seized him and hung him on the cross, and in light of their own doctrine, established that he was accursed. Even the Christians themselves consider him to be accursed; their justification is that he took this curse upon himself for their sake (See Al-Hakam, vol. 4, no. 28, dated 9 August 1900, pp. 3-4, Via Malfuzat-2, online English edition, page 48).
In 1902 (Jul-24), MGA argued that if one observes the life of the Messiah it becomes clear that he spent the entire night praying himself and asked his friends to pray as well, but ultimately
began to complain and said: ‘Eloi, eloi, lama sabachthani,’ meaning, ‘O God! O God! Why hast thou forsaken me?’ Now who would look at this regretful state and say that he was commissioned by Allah? The image of Christ in his final state as put forth by the Christian priests consistently is one which causes utter despair. These people make such tall claims that may heaven preserve us, yet Christ did not really achieve anything. Over the span of his entire life all he managed to do was to prepare a community of 120 people, and even these people were so foolish and ignorant that they could not even understand matters relating to the kingdom of God (See Al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 26, dated 24 July 1902, pp. 5-12, via Malfuzat-2, online English edition, page 234).
In 1903 (Aug-23), MGA alleged that Allah had decreed an accursed death for Eisa (as)(naozobillah), however, after Eisa (as) prayed (Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 (“”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“), Allah changed his decree and Eisa (as)(Via Malfuzat-5-Urdu, page 238)(dated as Aug-23-1903) was allowed to survive the crucifixion (See Bro Imtiaz streamed on TikTok with Amir Haq, See 3:47:14 time stamp, Jun-2026).
In 1906 (Feb), MGA allegedly received a Hebrew revelation, “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani”” (See Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34) and alleged that this revelation makes MGA think that someone might plan some harm secretly, like women, the ultimate result of which would be acquittal; but this is only my considered judgment. Allah knows best what is actually meant by it. A man attacks openly. To attack anonymously or in secret is not manly but is characteristic of women. The last sentence means: We saved Bani Isra’il from the mischief of Pharaoh (See the al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 8, February 23, 1906, p. 2 and al-Hakam, vol. 10, no. 7, February 24, 1906, p. 1,
Via Tadhkirah).
In 1906 (Mar), MGA alleged to have received a revelation wherein his God said “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani”” (Hebrew, this is Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34 “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”“)(See the Al-Badr, vol. 2, no. 12, p. 2, dated 22 March 1906, via Malfuzat-8, page 356, online English edition). MGA alleged From his ijtihad [interpretive judgement], I had understood this to mean that someone will plot secretly like women, which may lead to a case against me due to his deception, but in the end, I will be acquitted. But these are my interpreted meanings, and it is possible that what I saw before and what I saw now have another significance, but these are the apparent meanings. God knows.
In 1906, MGA quoted “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani”” (Hebrew, this is Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34) and argued that the God, to Whom Jesus had said, ‘Why hast Thou forsaken me?’, has not forsaken me. There have been many attacks on me, as there had been on the Messiah, but my enemies were frustrated in every one of them. A conspiracy was even hatched to have me executed, but, unlike the Messiah, I was not be crucified. Instead, my God saved me at the time of every trial, demonstrated great miracles for my sake, and helped me with His mighty hand. Through thousands of signs, He has proved to me that the True God is He Who revealed the Holy Quran and sent the Holy Prophet (saw). I do not at all consider Jesus to be superior to me in these matters. Just as the Word of God was revealed to him, so is it revealed to me; and just as he is said to have shown miracles, so have I been granted miracles, though in greater numbers. All this honour has been conferred upon me solely by virtue of being a follower of the Prophet whose spiritual station and high standing is largely hidden to the world, and he is none other than Muhammad, the Chosen Ones (See pages 25-26 and 53).
In 1906-1907, MGA quoted “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani”” (Hebrew, this is Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34) and argued that Yasu‘ the Messiah says in the Gospels, ‘If ye have faith even as much as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, move from here to there; and it shall move.’ But it seems that the entire prayer of Yasu‘ to spare his own life went to waste. Now Behold! What conclusion would be drawn about the faith of Yasu‘ according to the Gospels? It is not true at all that Yasu‘ prayed that he may well die on the cross, but it should be without distress. Was the prayer in the garden [of Gethsemane] meant only to spare him the distress? If this were the case, why did he raise the cry Eli Eli lama sabachtani when he was put on the cross? Does this utterance indicate that his distress had been removed at that moment? How far can a fabrication go? The prayer of Yasu‘ clearly has these words: ‘Let this cup pass from me.’ So God made that cup pass and created such circumstances as were sufficient to save his life; for example, the fact that he was not kept on the cross for up to six or seven days as was the norm, but was taken down within a short time, and that whereas the bones of others [crucified] were always broken, his bones were not broken. It is inconceivable that someone could die from such little torture (See Haqiqatul Wahi, Online English edition, page 53). On page 74, MGA argued that The assertion that the Messiah willingly accepted an accursed death is refuted by his passionate supplications in the garden that the cup [of death] be passed from him; and his lamentation when he was put on the cross: Eli Eli lama sabachtani, meaning: my God, my God, why have you forsaken me? If he was indeed content with that death on the cross why did he make supplications? And this notion that death of the Messiah on the cross was the
mercy of God on mankind and God was pleased to do this so that the world could find salvation through the blood of the Messiah, is rejected by the argument that if divine mercy was truly excited on that day then why was there a terrible earthquake which caused the veil of the Temple to be torn, and why was there such a severe sandstorm and the sun became dark? All this, indeed, shows that God was greatly displeased with the crucifixion of the Messiah
and this is why He chased the Jews for forty years and they suffered various calamities. First they died of a severe plague and at the end thousands of Jews were killed at the hands of Titus, the Roman. On page 75, There cannot be anything more absurd than to suggest that he willingly accepted death on the cross in order to redeem the sins of his people. The man who spent the entire night in tearful supplication in a garden to save his life—which was not even heard—and then he was so overwhelmed by panic that he cried out Eli Eli lama sabachtani at the time of the crucifixion. He addressed his God as God and forgot to call him ‘Father’ in that extreme anguish. Now, considering all this, can anyone believe that he died by his own volition? Who can understand the contradictions in Christian theology? On the one hand, they believe Yasu‘ to be God, while on the other, the same ‘God’ is seen praying and crying before another God. Whereas all three ‘Gods’ were inside Yasu‘ and he was the embodiment of them all, to whom did he tearfully supplicate? It appears from all this that there is another mighty God for Christians besides the Godheads of the Trinity, who is distinct from them and rules over them, before whom the three were obliged to supplicate.
In 1908 (May-18), This belief of those people that Jesus as did not engage in istighfar is false. This is their stupidity and ignorance, and they level a false allegation upon Jesus as. A study of the New Testament reveals that he repeatedly confessed to his weaknesses and even performed istighfar. What was meant by his cry ایلی اْیلی لما سبقتانی —Eli, Eli lama sabachthani?1 Why did he not cry out اِبى اِبى Abi, Abi [‘My Father, my Father!’]? In Hebrew, God is called Ail. The very meaning of this [verse] is ‘Have mercy and help me and do not leave me abandoned like this (in other words, Protect me)(See Al-Hakam, vol. 12, no. 34, p. 1–4, dated 18 May 1908, via Malfuzat-10, online English edition, page 433).
Intro
In 2026 (Jun-5), via a recent episode of “This Week with Huzoor”, Mirza Masroor Ahmad was asked about a prophecy of the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad (the Musleh Maud), in terms Ahmadiyya becoming a global system via “Nizam e Nau” (New World Order)(and via wasiyyat).
In 2026 (Apr)(6:09 time stamp), via an episode of “This Week with Huzoor“, Mirza Masroor Ahmad told an Ahmadi that after WW-3, after a total destruction of this planet, Ahmadi’s would reconstruct the world via “this Nizam” (aka Wasiyyat and other chanda’s)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter).
Intro
“Kalimatal Fasl” is the most controversial book in Ahmadiyya, it has the official Qadiani view on Takfir and the prophethood of MGA. It is in English for the first time ever herein (99% accurate). It was written by the only (alleged) college educated son of MGA, Mirza Bashir Ahmad. It should be noted that this book, Kalimatul Fasl was written in the Urdu-Review of Religions of 1915 (March and April) and serialized into book form afterwards. The second edition of Kalimatal Fasl was published again in 1941. Read the full book review herein.
Intro
In 56:35 of the Quran (56:36 in the Kadiani Koran), Allah tells us that in Jannatee (56:12 of the Quran), some of the rewards will be that Allah will give us women who are a new creation.
MGA seems to be silent on this as well as the Qadiani’s.
In 1917, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s in their famous English commentary of the Quran by Maulvi Muhammad Ali in 1917 gave NO commentary at all.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 56:35 of the Quran (56:36 in the Kadiani Koran)”