Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Month

July 2017

What is “Zadham-e-Ishq” aka “the love potion”

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s teachers were opium addicts, that appears to be his introduction to opium. In fact, MGA displays all the characteristics of an opium addict by age 30 or so. He must have been eating opium since his days as a child. It is said about Noorudin that he was fond of giving out a certain medicine to those people who were impotent, before he ever met MGA, in those days, that medicine didn’t have a name. Nevertheless, MGA was impotent in 1884, but he still got married, he then credits Nooruddin for giving him some mystery medicine which MGA claims cured him. MGA then claims to have many children with Nusrat Jehan, however, it is doubtful that MGA was the father, my team of researchers tends to think that Noorudin was the real father. The medicine was never named in MGA’s life, since MGA was lying about his opium use.
Continue reading “What is “Zadham-e-Ishq” aka “the love potion””

Ahmadiyya and the Panama Papers—2017 update

In 1890, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Qadian was mentioned in the Quran

Intro
With the publishing of Izala Auham, in the summer of 1890, all of MGA’s claims were finally revealed. In the first part of this book, MGA seems to say that the word Qadian was in the Quran. This had to do with the Isra and Miraa’j of Muhammad (saw), MGA was asserting that Muhammad (Saw) traveled to Qadian during his trip to heaven, in 1900 (in Khutbah Ilhamiya), he specifically claimed that Masjid Aqsa (see 17:1 of the Quran) which was referred to in the Quran as in Jerusalem, was actually Qadian. MGA claims to have received this indication via revelation in 1883, while his brother Mirza Ghulam Qadir was still alive, however, MGA didn’t publish it. Thus, this is classic case of MGA babbling about after-the-fact situations. Interestingly, MGA denied the physicality of the Miraa’j in this book also. MGA was asserting that it was all a dream. MGA would not repeat this assertion until his famous “Khutbah Ilhamiya” in 1900. Nevertheless, MGA was claiming to have seen a VISION wherein Qadian was written in the Quran, however, in reality, MGA was asserting that “Masjid Aqsa” as referred to in 17:1 was the same Masjid Aqsa as the one in Qadian. In fact, in the 5-volume commentary of the Quran by Ahmadi’s, they have also written there that ‘Masjid Aqsa”, may also refer to MGA’s Masjid Aqsa in Qadian (see page 1404), which was built by MGA’s father in 1876, just before he died.

______________________________________________________________________________________________
The quote from Izala Auham, part-1, 1890
Izala-e-Auham, pp. 76–77 footnote, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 3, p. 140 footnote, via the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah.

“”””On the day, when the revelation just mentioned—referring to Qadian—was received, I saw my brother Mirza Ghulam Qadirin a vision reciting the Holy Qur’an aloud. In the course of recitation he recited:

We have sent it down close to Qadian. (Inna anzalnahu qariban min al qadian)

I expressed my surprise that the name of Qadian should be mentioned in the Holy Qur’an, on which he said: ‘Here it is, you can see.’ I looked and saw that this revelation was set out about the middle of the right page of the Holy Qur’an. Then I said to myself: ‘It is true that the name of
Qadian is mentioned in the Holy Qur’an’ and I also said: ‘Three names are mentioned with honour in the Holy
Qur’an: Mecca, and Medina, and Qadian.’
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Izala-e-Auham, pp. 63–70 footnote, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 3, pp. 134–136 footnote, taken from ahmadi.answers, https://ahmadianswers.com/ahmad/allegations/revelations/qadian/

“Deep reflection on this revelation shows that the reference to Qadian in the revelation indicates that my appearance in Qadian had  been foretold in previous scriptures. Now that this new revelation has  shown that in Allah’s estimation Qadian resembles Damascus, the  meanings of the earlier revelation has been clarified.… The  interpretation is: We have sent it down close to Damascus on eastern side near the White Minaret”

 

“The last portion of the revelation indicates that the Holy Prophet(saw)  had mentioned the appearance of this person in his  hadith…and that God Almighty has also made reference to this in His Holy Word. The indication [by the Holy Prophet(sa)] has been mentioned among the revelations set out in part 3 and the indication in the Holy Qur’an is in the  following verse :

 

He it is Who sent His Messenger with guidance and the Religion  of Truth, that He might make it prevail over every other religion” (al-Taubah, 9:33; al-Fath, 48:29; al-Saff, 61:10)

 

The Sahih Muslim relates that the Messiah would descend near the white Minaret in the east of Damascus…. It has been disclosed to me by Allah that the interpretation of Damascus in this context is a town the dwellers of which have the temper of Yazid and the habits and thoughts of the wretched Yazid… It has been conveyed to me that by Damascus, therefore, is meant the place which possesses this well known characteristic of Damascus. By specifying Damascus as the place of the appearance of the Messiah, Allah the Almighty has indicated that by the [word] Messiah is not meant the first Messiah to whom the Gospel was revealed, but it refers to someone from among the Muslims who, in his spiritual aspect, would resemble the Messiah [Jesus] and also Imam Husain, for Damascus is the capital of Yazid and is the centre of the Yazidis from which proceeded thousands of tyrannical commands…. God Almighty, therefore, mentioned Damascus specifically for the purpose of indicating that whereas Damascus was the source of such tyrannical commands and was the city of such hard-hearted and black-minded people, now a city like Damascus will become the headquarters for spreading justice and faith, for most Prophets have appeared in towns whose people were wrongdoers and yet God has been converting the accursed places into homes of blessings. “””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The quote from Khutbah Ilhamiya
Khutba-Ilhamia, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 16, P. 20

“”At the time of this revelation, as i mentioned many times before, I was told in a state of a vision, that this relevation is written in the holy quran. And at that time in the vision I had this in my heart that three cities are mentioned in the quran: Makkah, Madinah and Qadian. This was about 20 years ago.“”

 

  • “The verse of Quran: ‘Praise be to Allah, who took his servant on the Night Journey from Masjid Haram to Masjid Aqsa‘, in true and literal sense, (Masjid Aqsa) is referring to the mosque of the Promised Messiah (in Qadian and not Jerusalem).”
    (Khutba-Ilhamia, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 16, P. 21;
    Collection of Posters, Vol. 3, P. 286;
    Collection of donations for Minaret-ul-Maseeh 10 years after claiming to be Maseeh)

——-“The Prophet (pbuh) went from Masjid-e-Haram to Mashid-e-Aqsa in his Miraj (ascension to heaven) – the Masjid-e-Aqsa mentioned there is the very mosque in Qadian on the Eastern side, the extreme side of Qadian.  God’s word names this place mubarak (the blessed).”
(Khutba-Ilhamia, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 16, P. 22)

“At the time of this revelation, as I have written many times, through a state of vision I also got to know that this revelation is written in the Holy Qur’an and at the time, in the state of vision, I had the certain belief in my heart that in the Holy Quran there is the mention of three cities, i.e. Mecca and Medina and Qadian. It has been nearly 20 years since I wrote it in Braheen e Ahmadiyya. Now at the time of writing this magazine, it was made clear to me that whatever I wrote as a vision in Braheen e Ahmadiyya about Qadian, i.e. that it’s mention is in the Holy Quran, is correct in reality because it is a certain fact that the verse of the Holy Qur’an Chapter 17, verse 2:- “Glory be to him Who carried His servant by night from the sacred mosque to the divine mosque, the environs of which we have blessed” comprises of both the spatial and the temporal miraj and without this the miraj remains incomplete/flawed. Thus as according to the spatial journey, God Most High took the Holy Prophet may peace be upon him from the Sacred Mosque to the Baitul Muqaddas, similarly in accord with the temporal journey, his holiness was taken from the era of the magnificence (shaukat) of Islam, which was the time of the Holy Prophet may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, to the era of the blessings (barakaat) of Islam, which is the time of the Promised Messiah.  Therefore, in keeping with the aspect that the visionary (kashfi) journey of the Holy Prophet may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him extends to the final era of Islam, Masjid-e- Aqsa means the mosque of the Promised Messiah which is situated in Qadian, relating to which in Braheen e Ahmadiyya, Allah says:

 

  ومبرک وکل امر مبرک یجعل فیہ مبرک

 

and this word ‘mubarak’ which has occurred in the objective (accusative) and the subjective case is in accord with the verse بَارَكْنَا حَوْلَه  of the Holy Qur’an. Therefore, there is no doubt that Qadian is mentioned in the Holy Qur’an as Allah Most High says:Glory be to Him Who carried His servant by night from the Sacred Mosque to the Divine Mosque, the environs of which We have blessed (Khutbah Ilhamiyyah, Roohani Khazain Vol 16, pg 20-21. Footnote)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Izala Auhaam P. 139, via Ahmadi answers, https://ahmadianswers.com/ahmad/allegations/revelations/qadian/

“”As the Name of Qadian is not written any where in Hadith or the Holy Qur’an…“
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Other relevant references

  • “God has exalted three cities (Mekkah, Medina and Qadian) and has chosen them as citadels for His spiritual expression.”
    (Al-Fadl, January 3, 1925; by Mirza Mahmud Ahmad)
  • “The saying of Allah Taala “He who entered it is safe” is true of Qadian.  The other name of Qadian is Dar-ul-Amaan – house of safety.”
    (Al-Fadl, December 10, 1934; by Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud)
  • “What is Qadian?  It is a prominent sign of God’s eminence and might.  As has been said by the Promised Maseeh (Mirza), this is the throne-place of His prophet; the place of his birth, his residence and the site of his tomb.  In this city, there is a house in which there lived the savior of mankind, the killer of Dajjal, the breaker of the Cross, the one who made Islam victorious over all other religion.  He was brought up there and he passed his life there.”
    (Al-Fadl, September 3, 1935)
  • “No doubt Qadian is the focus of God’s bounties and His blessings; nowhere else are such blessings to be found.  Mirza Ghulam Ahmad has said: ‘He who does not visit Qadian, I fear for his faith (imaan) that it will be destroyed’.”
    (Al-Fadl, September 25, 1937)
  • “If the Arab lands take pride in Haram (Mekkah), then the land of Ajam can take pride in Qadian.”
    (Al-Fadl, December 19, 1937)
  • “Islam in not complete without faith in Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian, just as Hajj is not complete without attending congregation at Qadian.  It is because Hajj to Mekkah these days does not serve its purpose.”
    (Paygham-e-Sulh, 19 April 1933)
  • “He who visits the tomb of the Promised Messiah (in Qadian) is blessed to the same degree as one who visits the green tomb of the Prophet Muhammad(pbuh) in Medina. Woe to the person who debars himself from the benefits of the blessing of Hajj-al-Akbar towards Qadian.”
    (Al-Fadl, December 13, 1939)
  • Al-Majid-ul-Aqsa is the Mosque which has been built by the Promised Messiah in Qadian. (not in Jerusalem)”
    (Anwar-e-Khilafat, P. 117)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

This is the first entry that I wrote on this topic 3-4 years ago
The Israa wal Miraaj and points to note:

1) Mirza Sahib’s successors were confused about the Isra wa al-Miraaj and gave multiple possibilities. Mirza Sahib himself did not seem certain as well and strangely explains that al-Aqsa as mentioned in Holy Quran refers to Qadian in Punjab, while his successors mention three possibilities: Jerusalem, Madinah, or Qadian (see red highlights).
2) Furthermore, Ahmadi mullahs mention that the verse 17:1 (17:2 for Qad.) does not refer to the Miraaj (see yellow highlight), but Mirza Sahib uses that verse to explain the Miraaj.
3) Mirza Sahib said that almost all of the Sahaaba (Companions) of Holy Prophet agreed that the Miraaj was physical, yet in the same book previously he says it was a type of wakefulness like an angelic body, not fully physical, going agianst belief of Sahaaba (see red poster).

Mirza Sahib further writes:

“At the time of this revelation, as I have written many times, through a state of vision I also got to know that this revelation is written in the Holy Qur’an and at the time, in the state of vision, I had the certain belief in my heart that in the Holy Quran there is the mention of three cities, i.e. Mecca and Medina and Qadian. It has been nearly 20 years since I wrote it in Braheen e Ahmadiyya. Now at the time of writing this magazine, it was made clear to me that whatever I wrote as a vision in Braheen e Ahmadiyya about Qadian, i.e. that it’s mention is in the Holy Quran, is correct in reality because it is a certain fact that the verse of the Holy Qur’an Chapter 17, verse 2:-

(سُبْحَانَ الَّذِي أَسْرَى بِعَبْدِهِ لَيْلًا مِنَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ إِلَى الْمَسْجِدِ الْأَقْصَى الَّذِي بَارَكْنَا حَوْلَهُ (17:2

Glory be to Him Who carried His servant by night from the Sacred Mosque to the Divine Mosque, the environs of which We have blessed comprises of both the spatial and the temporal miraj and without this the miraj remains incomplete/flawed. Thus as according to the spatial journey, God Most High took the Holy Prophet from the Sacred Mosque to the Baitul Muqaddas, similarly in accord with the temporal journey, his holiness was taken from the era of the magnificence (shaukat) of Islam, which was the time of the Holy Prophet, to the era of the blessings (barakaat) of Islam, which is the time of the Promised Messiah. Therefore, in keeping with the aspect that the visionary (kashfi) journey of the Holy Prophet extends to the final era of Islam, Masjid-e- Aqsa means the mosque of the Promised Messiah which is situated in Qadian, relating to which in Braheen e Ahmadiyya, Allah says:

مبرک ومبرک وکل امر مبرک یجعل فیہ

and this word ‘mubarak’ which has occurred in the objective (accusative) and the subjective case is in accord with the verse بَارَكْنَا حَوْلَه of the Holy Qur’an. Therefore, there is no doubt that Qadian is mentioned in the Holy Quran as Allah Most High says:

سُبْحَانَ الَّذِي أَسْرَى بِعَبْدِهِ لَيْلًا مِنَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ إِلَى الْمَسْجِدِ الْأَقْصَى الَّذِي بَارَكْنَا حَوْلَهُ

Glory be to Him Who carried His servant by night from the Sacred Mosque to the Divine Mosque,
the environs of which We have blessed”
(Khutbah Ilhamiyyah, Roohani Khazain Vol 16, pg 20-21. footnote)

JUDGEMENT OF MR G.D. KHOSLA’S Session Judge Gurdaspur, India, 6 June 1935 SYED ATTAULLAH SHAH BOKHARI APPEAL CASE

Intro
The mid-to-late 1930’s were rife with sexual misconduct and excesses at Qadian. Most of these wild behaviors were conducted by the Khalifa himself, who was above the law just because of his father and grandfather. Even Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri tells us about all the wild sexual misconduct in 1937, it started in 1932. Fakhur ud Din Multani was murdered as a result of the misconduct of the Khalifa in 1937 also. Nevertheless, in 1934, Ataullah Shah Bokhari was involved in this famous court case wherein the lifestyle of the Khalifa was exposed.

In order to respond to the misdeeds of Mirza Mahmoud and MIRZAI,S hooliganism at Qadian, Jamaat e Ahrar fixed a jalsa at Qadian which was held on 21 October, 1934. Renowned Orator and a top leader of Indian Independence movement, Syed Ataullah Shah Bukhari addressed this Jalsa and delivered a spirited speech there.

Mirza Mahmoud put every effort to stop this Jalsa but he failed. On 7th December, 1934 Syed Ataullah Shah Bukharia was arrested and a case was registered against him on the charge of promoting hatred and he was sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment by Dewan Sukh Anand Special Magistrate Gurdaspur, Punjab.

An appeal was filed before the Court of Mr. GD Khosla (ICS) Session Judge Gurdaspur. In his Judgement the honourable Judge exposed the Qadiani Jamaat and its founder by portraying it,s actual face. The honourable Judge then reduced the sentence till rising of the court.

COURT,S OBSERVATION REGARDING PLOMER,S TONIC WINE AND ADMISSION OF MIRZA MAHMOUD REGARDING HIS FATHER MGAQ.
Mr. GD Khosla in his landmark judgement observes :-“the Mirza, as it appears, was in the habit of taking a certain tonic called as Plomer,s Tonic Wine and on one occasion ordered his correspondent to get it for him from Lahore. There is also some reference of YAQUTI in one or two other letters. THE PRESENT MIRZA (Mirza Mahmoud) ADMITTED IN HIS EVIDENCE THAT HIS FATHER DID, ON ONE OCCASION, TAKE PLOMER,S WINE AND WAS WHAT MIGHT BE DESCRIBED A BON VIVANT.

(The court proceeding and Judgement as published in Qadiani Mouth organ Daily Al-Fazl Qadian dated 15 June 1935. Screen shot attached).

In the end, the Mirza family won the case, Justice Coldstream basically told Khosla that he was wrong and helped the #Qadianis (See, “His Holiness X-rayed”, 1935).
Continue reading “JUDGEMENT OF MR G.D. KHOSLA’S Session Judge Gurdaspur, India, 6 June 1935 SYED ATTAULLAH SHAH BOKHARI APPEAL CASE”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad used PAAN (beetle leef) during prayers

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was intoxicated during Salaat already, since he was opium related medicines since his childhood, it is even said that his father, Mirza Ghulam Murtaza smoked tobacco and was a physician and thus had access to all drugs at Qadian.  This is probably why MGA was never an “imam-proper” at Qadian after 1891, and barely a few times before 1891.
Nevertheless, in this narration it is proved that MGA was totally OK with the idea of praying while chewing PAAN (beetle-leaf), we are not sure how long MGA lived like this, however, he was nevertheless OK with this practice and many other strange traditions.  Further, it is against Islam to approach prayers while intoxicated, there is a famous verse in the quran that MGA violated (See 4:43).  All of MGA’s prayers are thus null and void.

The reference
Seeratul Mahdi
page 111/316
Narration 638

“Dr Mir Ismail narrated to me that once hz saheb (mgaq) had a severe cough attack, so much so that he would lose breath. But keeping a pan (beetle leaf) in mouth would give him much relief. At that time, in that condition he prayed having pan leaf in mouth so that he could pray with ease.”

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/03/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-got-stroked-during-salaat/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=never+led

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=opium

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-liked-his-opium-sprinkled-into-his-lassi/

http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=660&Itemid=59

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=opium

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/08/20/responding-to-ahmadi-answers-com-in-terms-of-mga-leading-salat-which-he-never-did/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mga-never-led-salaat-in-his-entire-life/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/16/dr-mir-muhammad-ismail-mgas-brother-in-law-lies-about-mga-leading-salaat/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/03/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-got-stroked-during-salaat/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/03/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-never-led-salaat/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Sialkot #Mosqueattack

 

Bashir Ahmad Misri, Murdered Multani were Correct about Mirza Mahmud in 1937 – Viceroy Papers

Intro
Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri was born in Qadian in 1914, he was the Ahmadi who accused Mahmud Ahmad of sex crimes in Qadian in the 1936-37. His father was Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri, who was a high-ranking Qadiani-Ahmadi-Imam in those days, in fact, he would sometimes serve as in-charge of Qadian when the Khalifa would be out of town. Bashir Ahmad Misri and his friends (Fakhr ud Din Multani was murdered, he died a few days later) were attacked in broad day light in Qadian on Saturday, 08-07-1937, around 4:30 pm at the time of Asr prayers. This led to his family asking for government and Muslim (the Ahrar’s) protection from the Mirza family. They seem to have moved to Lahore in late 1937. His father was hired as an Imam for the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.  However, Bashir Ahmad Misri joined Sunni-Islam in 1940 and moved to East Africa, wherein he seems to have worked as a teacher.  In 1961, he was allowed to move to London. A few years later, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s hired him to be an editor. It seems that Bashir Ahmad Misri was planning to make friends with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s and then to turn on them at an opportune time. Which is exactly what he did. In 1964, he became the Imam of the Woking Mosque. By July 1968, his plan was in motion, he organized the local Muslim’s and wrestled control of the mosque from the Lahori-Ahmadi’s to the local Muslim scholars. He them left and went on a tour. His father died as a Lahori-Ahmadi in Pakistan in 1979. Bashir Ahmad Misri then responded to Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s global Mubahila challenge in 1989 and wrote about his youth in Qadian. His death year is unknown to us.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The events of 1937 in Qadian went all the way to the Governor of the Punjab and the Governor-General (Viceroy) of India. Recently released documents by the Indian government show that:

  • Abdur Rahman Masri and Fakhruddin Multani did accuse Mirza Mahmud of moral turpitude of a sexual nature
  • Mirza Mahmud had no response but to incite violence against them up to the point that the Deputy Commissioner Gurdaspur was thinking about charging him.
  • Incitement led directly to the murder of Fakhruddin Multani
  • Deputy Commissioner Gurdaspur had to threaten Mirza Mahmud in order to get his tone down and renounce violence
  • Masri and Multani were guarded by police and authorities advised them to leave Qadian for their own safety
  • Section 144 (unlawful assembly) was imposed in Qadian for many days and mass prosecution under section 107 (incitement, same charge that was brought against Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) was contemplated

See this page from the original. Other pages and complete description is at Fakhruddin Multani’s page, and Masri’s account.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

http://www.wokingmuslim.org/work/islamic-review/isrevconts-1968.pdf

See here—https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-accused-of-immoral-behavior-at-qadian-1938-he-calls-it-normal/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/21/bashir-ahmad-misri-and-ahmadiyya/

Misri Mubahila

http://www.irshad.org/brochures/bane.php

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/uk/light-apr07.pdf

http://www.shahjahanmosque.org.uk/imam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/07/in-1937-was-the-mirza-family-was-suffering-the-divine-the-wrath-of-their-false-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/29/mazhar-multani-son-of-fakhar-uddin-multani-wrote-3-books-vs-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/fakhar-ud-din-multani-on-his-death-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/new-data-on-the-murder-of-fakhar-ud-din-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/20/the-first-time-a-qadiani-ahmadi-murdered-a-muslim-for-criticizing-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1930/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/07/in-1937-was-the-mirza-family-was-suffering-the-divine-the-wrath-of-their-false-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/29/mazhar-multani-son-of-fakhar-uddin-multani-wrote-3-books-vs-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/fakhar-ud-din-multani-on-his-death-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/new-data-on-the-murder-of-fakhar-ud-din-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/20/the-first-time-a-qadiani-ahmadi-murdered-a-muslim-for-criticizing-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1930/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Who is Fakhuruddin Multani?

Intro
Fakhruddin Multani was a prominent official of the Qadiani faction of the Ahmadiyya. He managed the printing and publication office in Qadian, India. He was really close friends with Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri, Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri was born in Qadian in 1914, he was the Ahmadi who accused Mahmud Ahmad of sex crimes in Qadian in the 1936-37.

The famous Seeratul Mahdi was published from the home of Fakhruddin Multani, his home was a printing press, he also published the 1927 edition and 1935.

Thus, in 1937, he asked for a public inquiry into the moral character of Mirza Mahmud Ahmad. Since Mirza Mahmud Ahmad had established a personality cult around his person, he took a very dim view and started to incite his followers to ostracize, harass and harm the dissenters. They were both attacked in broad day light in Qadian on Saturday, 08-07-1937, around 4:30 pm at the time of Asr prayers. Multani was thus stabbed by a fanatical Ahmadi on the 6th or 7th of August, 1937 and succumbed to his injuries on the 13th of August, 1937. The murderer, Aziz Ahmad, was lauded by the Ahmadiyya community, as well as by Mirza Mahmud Ahmad. A picture of Fakhr ud Din Multani on his deathbed can be found here. This led to his family asking for government and Muslim (the Ahrar’s) protection from the Mirza family. Misri and his whole family thus moved to Lahore in late 1937. The Lahori-Ahmadi have mentioned this murder in their book about Muhammad Ali, “A Mighty Striving”, see page 239. Qadiani-Ahmadi sources are totally silent in contrast. Many years later, his son wrote about Ahmadiyya and explained all of this.

Continue reading “Who is Fakhuruddin Multani?”

Mirza Masroor Ahmad mentioned Shaikh Abdur Rehman al-Misri on 24th July, 2015

Taken from here: https://www.alislam.org/friday-sermon/2015-07-24.html#summary-tab

Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, had previously received a revelation associated with Misri:

Do not kill Zainab.

– Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Al Badr 13 February 1908

The revelation has been explained as follows:

In early 1908 Mr Hafiz Ahmad sought marriage proposals for his two daughters Zainab and Kalsoom. There were a few proposals for Zainab and among those the Promised Messiahas [Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad] did not like a proposal from a Mr Misri, but as was his way he did not force the matter. It is during these days the Promised Messiah received the revelation: “Do not kill Zainab”. Mr Hafiz understood this revelation to mean that he should get his daughter married to Mr Misri assuming the revelation had overridden earlier advice of the Promised Messiah. He had his daughter married to Mr Misri. The revelation is dated 9 February whereas his daughter’s marriage took place on 17 February. The date of the marriage was chronicled as it took place with a couple of other marriages including that of Hazrat Nawab Mubaraka Begum. God had clearly forewarned about Zainab’s marriage, inferring that there would be trouble, but her father presumed it to mean the opposite. Proof exists that the Promised Messiah advised against this marriage because when Mr Misri later left the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community someone said the Promised Messiah had indeed advised against this marriage to him. The narrator said he did not like it when the marriage went ahead and submitted to the Promised Messiah that he was commissioned by God and God commands to listen to those commissioned by him but Mr Hafiz had not done so. The Promised Messiah replied that this was indeed so, but added that he did not interfere in such matters.

The second Caliph wrote that although he had no doubt about this tradition when it came before him but he thought of seeking a concrete proof. The very next day he received a letter in the post in which someone had written that when he was in Qadian he learned the holy Quran from Mr Hafiz Ahmad who once told him that the Promised Messiah had asked him to marry his daughter elsewhere but he misunderstood his revelation and thought his earlier advice was not correct and married his daughter to Mr Misri. He said Mr Misri was very harsh with his daughter and he felt it was a consequence of him not abiding by what the Promised Messiah had said. The second Caliph writes that he remembers Mr Misri beating up his father-in-law in the middle of town, following which [his predecessor] the first Caliph was very displeased with him and the second Caliph had pleaded with him to forgive Mr Misri.

Sheikh Abdul Rehman al-Misri is part of history of the community. He was an educated man who took the pledge of allegiance in the lifetime of the Promised Messiah. The Promised Messiah and Chaudhry Nasrullah Khan Sahib sponsored him to go to Egypt. It was owing to his trip to Egypt that he was given the title of ‘Misri’ (Misr being the Arabic name for Egypt). A time came that he highly opposed the second Caliph and said much against him and tried to create discord in the community. God protected the community against his ploys and some people were shown dreams exposing his ploys. He had so much respect and standing in the community that when he left someone wrote to the second Caliph from Africa that Mr Misri’s separation from the community was highly worrisome because if such important and significant people lost their faith what was to be said of the faith of ordinary people like the letter-writer. The second Caliph wrote back saying it was for God to decide who was important and significant and not for the letter-writer, adding that God had made Mr Misri lose his way which proved that the letter-writer was important and significant and not Mr Misri. After his disagreement and leaving the community, Mr Misri tried to show his importance by associating himself with the revelation but after the second Caliph exposed the reality behind it all, he complained why was his wife dragged into it all.

The second Caliph remarked at the tremendous prophecy ‘Do not kill Zainab’ and said Mr Misri himself drew attention to it at the latter stage. He said this was like Arabs cite a story about a man who took out a knife to slaughter a goat but then forgot about it. In their play his children push the knife in the dust on the ground. While he looked for the ‘lost’ knife the goat dragged its feet on the dust and exposed the knife. When someone causes their own ruination Arabs say he has exposed the knife like the goat did. Had he abided by what the Promised Messiah advised him his faith would not have been wasted. Believers should listen to those sent by God.

– Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Friday Sermon 24 July 2015 as summarised by alislam.org

 

Do not kill Zainab.

– Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Al Badr 13 February 1908

The revelation has been explained as follows:

In early 1908 Mr Hafiz Ahmad sought marriage proposals for his two daughters Zainab and Kalsoom. There were a few proposals for Zainab and among those the Promised Messiahas [Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad] did not like a proposal from a Mr Misri, but as was his way he did not force the matter. It is during these days the Promised Messiah received the revelation: “Do not kill Zainab”. Mr Hafiz understood this revelation to mean that he should get his daughter married to Mr Misri assuming the revelation had overridden earlier advice of the Promised Messiah. He had his daughter married to Mr Misri. The revelation is dated 9 February whereas his daughter’s marriage took place on 17 February. The date of the marriage was chronicled as it took place with a couple of other marriages including that of Hazrat Nawab Mubaraka Begum. God had clearly forewarned about Zainab’s marriage, inferring that there would be trouble, but her father presumed it to mean the opposite. Proof exists that the Promised Messiah advised against this marriage because when Mr Misri later left the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community someone said the Promised Messiah had indeed advised against this marriage to him. The narrator said he did not like it when the marriage went ahead and submitted to the Promised Messiah that he was commissioned by God and God commands to listen to those commissioned by him but Mr Hafiz had not done so. The Promised Messiah replied that this was indeed so, but added that he did not interfere in such matters.

The second Caliph wrote that although he had no doubt about this tradition when it came before him but he thought of seeking a concrete proof. The very next day he received a letter in the post in which someone had written that when he was in Qadian he learned the holy Quran from Mr Hafiz Ahmad who once told him that the Promised Messiah had asked him to marry his daughter elsewhere but he misunderstood his revelation and thought his earlier advice was not correct and married his daughter to Mr Misri. He said Mr Misri was very harsh with his daughter and he felt it was a consequence of him not abiding by what the Promised Messiah had said. The second Caliph writes that he remembers Mr Misri beating up his father-in-law in the middle of town, following which [his predecessor] the first Caliph was very displeased with him and the second Caliph had pleaded with him to forgive Mr Misri.

Sheikh Abdul Rehman al-Misri is part of history of the community. He was an educated man who took the pledge of allegiance in the lifetime of the Promised Messiah. The Promised Messiah and Chaudhry Nasrullah Khan Sahib sponsored him to go to Egypt. It was owing to his trip to Egypt that he was given the title of ‘Misri’ (Misr being the Arabic name for Egypt). A time came that he highly opposed the second Caliph and said much against him and tried to create discord in the community. God protected the community against his ploys and some people were shown dreams exposing his ploys. He had so much respect and standing in the community that when he left someone wrote to the second Caliph from Africa that Mr Misri’s separation from the community was highly worrisome because if such important and significant people lost their faith what was to be said of the faith of ordinary people like the letter-writer. The second Caliph wrote back saying it was for God to decide who was important and significant and not for the letter-writer, adding that God had made Mr Misri lose his way which proved that the letter-writer was important and significant and not Mr Misri. After his disagreement and leaving the community, Mr Misri tried to show his importance by associating himself with the revelation but after the second Caliph exposed the reality behind it all, he complained why was his wife dragged into it all.

The second Caliph remarked at the tremendous prophecy ‘Do not kill Zainab’ and said Mr Misri himself drew attention to it at the latter stage. He said this was like Arabs cite a story about a man who took out a knife to slaughter a goat but then forgot about it. In their play his children push the knife in the dust on the ground. While he looked for the ‘lost’ knife the goat dragged its feet on the dust and exposed the knife. When someone causes their own ruination Arabs say he has exposed the knife like the goat did. Had he abided by what the Promised Messiah advised him his faith would not have been wasted. Believers should listen to those sent by God.

– Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Friday Sermon 24 July 2015 as summarised by alislam.org

 

Bashir Ahmad Misri’s Mubahila with Mirza Tahir Ahmad (1989)

Intro
Hafiz Bashir Ahmad Misri was born in Qadian in 1914, he was the Ahmadi who accused Mahmud Ahmad of sex crimes in Qadian in the 1936-37.  His father was Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri, who was a high-ranking Qadiani-Ahmadi-Imam in those days, in fact, he would sometimes serve as in-charge of Qadian when the Khalifa would be out of town.  Bashir Ahmad Misri and his friends (Fakhr ud Din Multani was murdered, he died a few days later) were attacked in broad day light in Qadian on Saturday, 08-07-1937, around 4:30 pm at the time of Asr prayers.  This led to his family asking for government and Muslim (the Ahrar’s) protection from the Mirza family.  They seem to have moved to Lahore in late 1937.  His father was hired as an Imam for the Lahori-Ahmadi’s.  However, Bashir Ahmad Misri joined Sunni-Islam in 1940 and moved to East Africa, wherein he seems to have worked as a teacher.  In 1961, he was allowed to move to London.  A few years later, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s hired him to be an editor.  It seems that Bashir Ahmad Misri was planning to make friends with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s and then to turn on them at an opportune time.  Which is exactly what he did.  In 1964, he became the Imam of the Woking Mosque.  By July 1968, his plan was in motion, he organized the local Muslim’s and wrestled control of the mosque from the Lahori-Ahmadi’s to the local Muslim scholars.  He them left and went on a tour.  His father died as a Lahori-Ahmadi in Pakistan in 1979.  Bashir Ahmad Misri then responded to Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s global Mubahila challenge in 1989 and wrote about his youth in Qadian while he was living in England.  His death year is unknown to us.

1st January 1989
Al Hafiz B.A. Masri
7 Hurst Road East Molesey Surrey KT8 9AQ England
To Mr. Tahir Ahmad Mirza Amir Jamaat Ahmadiyya 16-18 Gressenhall Road London SW18 5QL England

Taken from: http://ahmedi.org/eng-articles/misrimubahila.html

1.Your secretary Mr. Rashid Ahmad Chaudhry, has sent me a letter (undated) by Recorded Delivery daring me on your behalf to accept your challenge of Mubahilla which you gave to the opponents of Qadianism on the 10th June 1988. This letter, along with a copy your challenge reached me on the 5th of August 1988.

2. It gives me great pleasure to accept your challenge and to avail myself of this opportunity to expose the pious fraud of Qadianism once and for all.

3. Mubahilla is a sort of ordeal by prayer in which two parties beseach Allah to establish the truth or falsity of matter under dispute. Since Mubahilla is a grave matter of utmost solemnity, it is expedient that we should settle its articles and convenants directly between the two of us instead of negotiating through our secretaries to avoid any possibility of ambiguity or incertitude in the final result of it.

4. On page 4 of your challenge you have conceded that those who accept your challenge are free to single out any one clause out of the articles you have listed. I therefore choose to accept the articles which you have written on page 2 in these words: “The second aspect of this Mubahilla concerns the utterly false accusations and the mischieveous propaganda against the Ahmadiyya community.”

5. Since my accusations are about matters of moral turpitude and sexual promiscuity of a nature which is not generally thought fit to be mentioned to ears polite, it needs to be explained as to why I feel justified and morally obliged in making these immodest accusations as issue for this ‘Mubahila’.

6. Normally no individual has a right to sit in judgement on another individual. However when a person assume a position of trust and moral responsibility he becomes personalized as an institution and forfeits his prerogative as an individual. In any civilized society, Doctors of Medicine, School Teachers, Office Bearers of Destitute Homes and Orphanges, the functionaries of all such institutions become open to moral and ethical censorship, in addition to Statutory Law. One of the reasons why religious charlatans and impostors remain unconstrained from the exploition of simple and gullible people is that the Governments of Secular States do not feel inclined to interfere in matters spiritual. It is left to society at large to regulate the affairs of their respective religious institutions and establishments.

7. My second justification is that your Qadiani clique started violating the civilized norms of sexual ethics not as individuals but as an institution in the name of Islam. Stop calling yourselves as Muslims, give yourselves any appellation as a new religion and Muslims will gladly leave you alone.

8. My accusations are not against the generality of the Qadiani community. There are many among them who believe in the Qadiani doctrines honestly and sincerely, albeit mistakenly. We do not start kicking against the people of other faiths on the grounds of doctrinal differences. It is only when their lifestyle becomes a menace to the ethical fabric of a society that people put their foot down. If there are degenerates in this world who are willing to sacrifice the honour and chastity of their womenfolk and young boys out of devotion to the religious thugs, good luck to them. However the moot point of contention arises when unsuspecting and innocent victims fall prey to such deceits. In that situation you feel justified in shouting from the roof-tops: Snake in the grass!

9. It is with this sence of moral responsibility and genuine solicitude that I accept your challenge of Mubahilla to establish whether the following accusations are true or false. MY CLAIM THAT THEY ARE TRUE IS BASED ON MY PERSONAL KNOLEDGE GAINED DURING MY LIFE IN QADIAN WHERE I WAS BORN AND BROUGHT UP UNTIL 1937, WHEN I DENOUNCED QADIANISM. THE OATH OF MUBAHILA

10. You shall declare on oath, in the words laid down below, that the under-mentioned statements made by me are false to the best of your knowledge; and I shall declare oath in the same words that they are true to the best of my knowledge:

11. “I Mirza Tahir Ahmad (Son of Mirza Basheer-ud-Din Mahmoud Ahmad s/o Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement), the present Amir of the Qadiani section of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, declare it on oath in the name of Allah that to the best of my knowledge, the under-mentioned statements made by Al-Hafiz B-A Masri, s/o Sheikh Abdul Rahman Masri, are false and that I have no knowledge to the effect that they are true. I pray and beseech Allah that in case I am perjuring myself by willingly uttering this false evidence while on oath, I may be cursed by Allah and die within one year from the date of uttering and signing of this oath in the presence of six witnesses, three of whom shall be selected by me and three shall be selected by the said Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri.”
Signed by: six witnesses Signed by Mirza Tahir Ahmad .

12.”I, Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri (s/o Sheikh Abdul Rahman Masri), declare it on oath the name of Allah that, to the best of my knowledge, the under-mentioned statements made by me are true. I further declare it on oath in the name of Allah that Mirza Tahir Ahmad, the present Amir of the Qadiani section of the Ahmiadiyya Jamaat knows that they are true. I pray and beseech Allah that in case I am perjuring myself by wilfully uttering this false evidence while on oath, I may be cursed by Allah and die within one year from the date of uttering and signing of this oath in the presence of six witnesses three of whom shall be selected by the said Mirza Tahir Ahmad.”
Signed by: Six Witnesses Signed by Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri. THE ADJURATIONS OF MUBAHILA

13. I, Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri, give this evidence on oath in the name of Allah that: Your father, Mirza Basheer ud-din Mahmoud Ahmad (the eldest of the three sons of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad who was the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement, the Second Khalifa of the Qadiani section of the Ahmadiyya Jama’at) was a debaucher, fornicator, adulterer and incestuous i.e. guilty of habitual sexual intercourse even with women of near kin who are declared by not only the Islamic Shari’ah but also by all scriptural religions as inviolable (Haram). Your paternal uncle, Mirza Basheer Ahmad ( the second of the three sons of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) was a homosexual with a great sexual propensity for young boys. Your paternal uncle, Mirza Shareef Ahmad (the third of the three sons of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) was a homosexual with a great propensity for your boys. Your elder brother, Mirza Nasir (s/o Mirza Basheer- ud-Din Mahamoud Ahmad, grandson of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the third Khalifa) was a fornicator and homosexual. Your maternal grand-uncle, Mir Muhammad Ishaque (brother of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s wife) held an oligarchial and celebrated position in the Qadiani community and was honoured with the title of Muhaddith, i.e. authority on Hadith (Sunnah and Tradition). He was a homosexual. As the man-in-charge of the orphanage in Qadian, the young orphan boys were helplessly at the mercy of his perversions.

14. I could go on listing many more names of people who held very high positions in the Qadiani Establishment, using their prestige and power to gratify their sensuous and perverted desires free of moral censure. However the real reason for writing these sordid details, even though it is an obscene subject, is to refute your assertion that the accusations are utterly false” and a “mischievous propaganda” against the “Ahmadies” while you know fully well that they are true.

15. As it is, I have confined the list of people in the above accusation to the Mirza family only in order not to confiuse the issue and thus to leave any loop-hole in it for to wriggle out of this Mubahila. Even within the Mirza family, I have left out many names of the second and the third generations for the same reason. The main reason for not including women of this family in this list is out of comassion. Although some of them have played a very active and willing role in this abomination and fraud, I consider them by and large as being the victims rather than the cluprits. Most of them had no choice and deserve pity.

16. The circumscription of the period of Mubahila to one year is meant to achieve definitive verdict of Allah. Leaving it open to generalities and to an unspecified period as you have done in your challenge, would leave the outcome of the Mubahila inconclusive. However, I am open to suggestions by you for any alteration in the span of time.

17. In case you try to seek shelter under the plea that you cannot vouch under oath for the good or bad moral conduct of those who are dead, I would point out that you have already agreed in principle to do so, on page 8 of your challenge in these words: “Since the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement is no longer in this world and it is neccessary that there should be a party to represent him, I and the Ahmadiyya community declare it with all our hearts and without any scruples that we accept this challenge of Mubahilla on his dehalf.”

18. If you are prepared to accept the challenge of Mubahilla on behalf of your dead grandfather, there is no earthly reason why you should not be able to accept a similar Mubahilla on behalf of your dead father, dead uncles and dead brother.

19. Apart from this the moot point at issue on which I am accepting your challenge of Mubahilla is not that you should represent your ancestors mentioned in paragraph 13. Your are being put on oath to vouch for yourself whether or not it is within your knowledge that your ancestors named in that paragraph were morally depraved and sexual debauchees. The reson why it has become necessary to drag these obscenities into the open is to prove that you as the head of a so-called religious denomination, know all these facts to be true and yet you are hypocritically misleading your followers and others and perpetuating the fraud of Qadianism in the name of Islam.

20. I hope you will appreciate that, by accepting your challenge of Mubahillah. I am giving you a unique chance of proving once and for all that my accusations are false. What you have to do is simply to declare on oath, in the words prescribed above in paragraph 11, that you have no knowledge that my above-stated accusations in paragraph 13 are true. I assertively insist that you know without a shadow of doubt that my accusations are true, so much so that on my part I am prepared unhesitatingly to stake not only my cerdibility but my life as well on it. More than that I am prepared to lay myself open to the eternal curse of Allah on myself, in case I am wrong or uttering a falsehood.

21. Mr Tahir Ahmad! Let us take our case to the Court of Allah, the Supreme Judge of the Universe and leave it to him to adjudge between us.
Signed: B.A. Masri. Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri.
P.S. Since there are millions of Muslims who do not know Urdu,I would request you to do all your correspondence on this subject in English, which can be translated later into Urde, Arabic and other languages.
B.A. Masri.
BY REGISTERED POST To Mr. Tahir Ahmad Mirza Amir Jama’at Ahmadiyya 16-18 Gressenhall Road London SW18 5QL England.

A REMINDER It is noted that you have neglected to respond to my letter, accepting your challenge of Mubahilla. This was mailed to you by registered post on the 18th August 1988, and two months later there is still no reply from you. In case I do not receive a reply from you within two weeks, I shall have to make it known to the Muslim world that your challenge of Mubahilah was nothing more than a cheap con game and a confidence trick at which you people have become quite adept.
I would like to make this point clear that, until the oath of Mubahila has been pronounced and Allah’s Judgement has been invoked solemnly by both the parties, the Mubahilah does not become operative. I have to request you, in your own interest, not to try to have me killed, as your predecessors used to do when cornered in similar circumstances. Otherwise the consequences for you and your minions would be extremely disastrous.
The whole Muslim world has come to know what kind of people you are. They are getting fed up with your Qadiani fraud in the name of Islam and are not prepared to put up with it any longer. I am still hoping against hope that you would tell me when and how you would like both of us take the oath of Mubahila.

Signed: Al Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri.

Links and Related Essays

Misri Mubahila

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

http://www.wokingmuslim.org/work/islamic-review/isrevconts-1968.pdf

See here—https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-accused-of-immoral-behavior-at-qadian-1938-he-calls-it-normal/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/21/bashir-ahmad-misri-and-ahmadiyya/

Misri Mubahila

http://www.irshad.org/brochures/bane.php

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/uk/light-apr07.pdf

http://www.shahjahanmosque.org.uk/imam

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/07/in-1937-was-the-mirza-family-was-suffering-the-divine-the-wrath-of-their-false-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/29/mazhar-multani-son-of-fakhar-uddin-multani-wrote-3-books-vs-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/fakhar-ud-din-multani-on-his-death-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/new-data-on-the-murder-of-fakhar-ud-din-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/20/the-first-time-a-qadiani-ahmadi-murdered-a-muslim-for-criticizing-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1930/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Up ↑