Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Month

September 2018

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on Aisha (ra) and child marriage

Intro
Dear readers, we have recently found some references from MGA in terms of the age of Aisha at her marriage and that of child marriage in general. We are searching for additional quotes. MGA mentioned the marriage of Aisha (ra) in depth in Arya Dharam.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The quotes
Nurul Quran, No.2, Ruhani Khazain, V.9, pp.377-378

“With reference to Hazrat ‘A’ishah’sra age on her wedding ceremony, it has been written that she was 9 years of age. Firstly, there is no evidence that the Holy Prophetsa stated this, nor had there been any revelation in regards to this. Nor is it substantiated from the Akbaar-e-Mutawaatirah, [Saying of the Prophet Muhmmadsa reported by a large number of people] that she was certainly 9 years. It has only been taken from one narrator. The Arab people did not keep birth certificates because they were unlettered and in view of their circumstances, a difference of two or three years is normal. Even in our country, many illiterate people cannot tell the difference between a couple of years. Moreover, if hypothetically, we were even to accept this, after having calculated each and every day, that she was in fact 9 years old; even then no intelligent person could object – research doctors have come to agree upon that girls can attain maturity even at the age of 9; in fact, they can even have children at the age of 7. And doctors have proven this through major observations. Many hundreds have witnessed with their own eyes that in this country 9 year old girls have had children.””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Arya DharamRuhani Khazain, v.10, p.64

“Hazrat ‘A’ishahra being 9 years is only found among baseless statements. It is not proven by any Hadith or the Quran
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Mirza Bashir Ahmad wrote in 1920

The author of one of the most comprehensive biographies on the Prophet MuhammadsaThe Life and Character of the Seal of Prophets, suggests that Hazrat ‘A’ishahra may have been twelve years old. Since girls mature quickly in hot climates, it would not have been anything unusual for her to have been married at this age.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and related Essay’s

The Noble Wives of the Holy Prophet (sa)

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=aisha

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/30/arya-dharam-or-the-arya-religion-1895-by-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/30/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-on-aisha-ra-and-child-marriage/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/04/mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-the-ahmadi-khalifa-claims-that-child-marriage-is-ok-in-the-21st-century-and-aisha-was-12/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/03/ahmadis-lie-about-the-aisha-hadith-in-terms-of-the-end-of-prophets/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/30/arya-dharam-or-the-arya-religion-1895-by-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

The Life & Character of the Seal of Prophets(sa) – Volume II

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=MIrza+Bashir+ahmad

Did Muhammad marry Aisha when she was only six years old?

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

 

“Arya Dharam” or “The Arya Religion” (1895) by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

Intro
This is an interesting book, we haven’t totally evaluated it yet.  However, it seems to have lots of controversial information. MGA wrote about the child-marriage of Aisha and many other related topics. The Arya Samaj hindus seem to have written an analysis of the marriages of Muhammad (saw). MGA and his team responded with “The Arya Religion” (1895). The second edition of this book was published in 1903. This was a small part in the overall beef that MGA started with the Arya Samaj in the early 1880’s. Lekh Ram came soon thereafter. In this book, MGA complained that his God and prophet were being unnecessarily ridiculed and it should be against the law, however, MGA himself insulted the God of Christians in this very, in fact, he used Hindu writings vs. Jesus Christ as he called him a drunkard and a fornicator. Continue reading ““Arya Dharam” or “The Arya Religion” (1895) by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad specifically wanted europeans prostitutes to be given to British soldiers in India

Intro
Watch my video on this herein, and my Tik Tok and instagram. MGA was so far gone, he endorsed an idea wherein european prostitutes should be brought in to service the British soldiers who were toiling in India. Arya Darham is the same book that contains sexual poetry and etc. In this same book, MGA wrote about the child-marriage of Aisha and many other related topics. The Arya Samaj hindus seem to have written an analysis of the marriages of Muhammad (saw). MGA and his team responded with “The Arya Religion” (1895). The second edition of this book was published in 1903. This was a small part in the overall beef that MGA started with the Arya Samaj in the early 1880’s. Lekh Ram came soon thereafter. In this book, MGA complained that his God and prophet were being unnecessarily ridiculed and it should be against the law, however, MGA himself insulted the God of Christians in this very book, in fact, he used Hindu writings vs. Jesus Christ as he called him a drunkard and a fornicator.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad specifically wanted europeans prostitutes to be given to British soldiers in India”

Social and Economic Influence of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in Flanders-Belgium By: Khalid Saifullah (2008)

Intro
Dear readers, my team and I have across a doctoral type of dissertation by an Ahmadi about Ahmadiyya in Belgium.  This is from 2008, this proves all the arguments that we made about Ahmadiyya lying about their conversions from the late 90’s to the mid 2000’s. 

Link

Click to access Ahmadiyya.pdf

Free download
Social and Economic Influence of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in

Related essays and links
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/06/05/mirza-tahir-ahmad-explains-how-and-why-ahmadis-have-always-lied-about-their-global-membership-number/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/31/in-1921-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-claimed-that-there-were-700000-ahmadis-in-the-world/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/17/mirza-nasir-ahmad-at-the-1974-national-assembly-testifying-on-oath-about-the-number-of-ahmadis/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/15/ahmadis-lie-about-themselves-being-the-fastest-growing-islamic-sect-world-christian-encyclopedia/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/08/13/the-old-cult-girl-confessions-blog-expontential-growth-in-ahmadis-an-ex-ahmadi-shows-otherwise/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/30/ahmadis-always-lie-about-conversions-at-the-ukjalsa/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/29/why-arent-people-in-the-usa-the-uk-germany-and-canada-converting-to-ahmadiyya/

Mirza Masroor Ahmad’s guidance to office holders

Intro
We just wanted to post some quotes.

The quotes

  1. Waqfeen (life devotees) and Community office holders should make this prayer [v 287 of Surah Al Baqarah] in abundance. (October 6, 2006)
  2. Among the duties of Khilafat, justice ranks very high. The office holders of the Community should be mindful that they represent the Khalifa in their tasks and ought to carry out their obligations fully mindful that God is ever watching them. If they are angry with someone over something, they should wait a couple of days before handling the specific matter. (November 10, 2006)
  3. Huzur said that on his instruction Ameer Sahib has carried out a survey, which informs us that the rate of incidents of culpability amongst men (regarding commitment of excesses) are three times that of women, whereas in 30% to 40% of matters it is the in-laws who create the friction…. Regarding this issue if similar surveys were carried out in USA or Canada as the one in the UK, a similar picture would emerge. The department of Tarbiyyat and all the auxiliaries need to be very pro-active in this matter. (November 10, 2006)
  4. The Community has office-holders who work as representatives of the Khalifa of the time. It is their obligation to establish fairness in the real sense. Each office holder is directly accountable for his/her actions but has the added responsibility of representing the Khalifa of the time. They should bear in mind that if they deem they can keep the Khalifa of the time in the dark over some matter, nothing is hidden from the One Who is the real Master. (April 6, 2007)
  5. When electing office-holders, prayers should be made and people should be chosen on merit rather than friendship and kinship. (April 6, 2007)
  6. If [Office holders] are not discharging their obligations properly then they are not honouring their responsibility in the spirit [quoted Hadith] of looking after the Master’s property, which in this instance, has been given to them by the Khalifa of the time. (April 6, 2007)
  7. There are usually complaints from the women’s side that the Salat rows are not straight and that even office holders stand in uneven rows. Another complaint is that elderly or unwell ladies place chairs in the middle of rows to offer their Salat. This usually takes place at large gatherings like Jalsa etc. Those who have to offer their Salat sitting on chairs should move to one side or at the back. (April 13, 2007)

What is Saif-e-Chishtiyai (The Chishtia Sword), by Pir Mehr Ali Shah (1902)

Intro

MGA’s confrontation with Pir Mehr Ali Shah started in 1899. Pir Mehr Ali Shah had a book vs. MGA published in May of 1899. It was printed at the Mustafa’i Press, Lahore in Ramadan 1317 A.H. Maulawi Nur-ud-Din read a few pages of this book on February 17th, 1900, and wrote a letter to Pir Mihr Ali Shah the next day. It was written in this book that if any one wanted to say
anything about this book he must refer to authentic commentaries such as Ibni Jarir and Ibni Kathir and also to the true Hadith or he must base his arguments upon the Holy Quran, which should be acceptable to the great and learned people who are masters of language and rhetorics (page 8). Though the book is written in Urdu, yet the writer has occasionally
employed Arabic also to show his learning. So Maulawi Nur-ud-Din asked the Pir eleven questions in his letter (see Dard). MGA also wrote responses to the Pir in his book, “Nuzul ul Masih”, which seems to have been written in 1902 and published after MGA died in 1909.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________April 24th, 1900

Maulawi Abdul Karim wrote a response in the Al-Hakam, dated April 24th, 1900, and pressed Mihr Ali Shah in vain for an answer to the eleven questions put to him (see Dard).

July 9th 1900
Maulawi Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan reminded Mihr Ali Shah and also challenged him to
hold a debate with him about the life or death of Jesusas, the subject of Mihr Ali Shah’s book (see Dard).

On July 20th, 1900
MGA issued an announcement in which he invited Mihr Ali Shah to a contest.  On page 81, Mihr Ali Shah had insinuated that MGA did not know the Quran, so he suggested that a meeting be held at Lahore and forty verses of the Quran should be selected by casting lots. MGA and Mihr Ali Shah should then pray that God might enable the truthful of the two to write in fluent Arabic a commentary of the verses in that very meeting with the help of the Holy Spirit. The commentary should be not less than 43 pages. The parties should have no book with them, nor should there be any assistant. Seven hours should be given for this purpose. The parties should then sign the papers which would be read out to three learned men selected by Mihr Ali Shah. They should neither be the followers of MGA nor of Mihr Ali Shah. These three men should then give their decision under oath as to which of the papers was superior in language as well as in commentary. MGA also said he was prepared to entrust the decision to his enemies like Maulawi Muhammad Husain, Maulawi Abdul Jabbar Ghaznavi and Professor Maulawi Abdullah. This Ishtihar was signed by 20 men as witnesses (see Dard).  MGA gave Pir Mehr Ali Shah a deadline of August 22nd to respond.

July 23rd, 1900
MGA issued an Urdu leaflet (Arba‘in No. 1) on July 23rd, 1900.  He declared that it was not a Mubahala nor was it meant to be a dreadful prophecy for any opponent. He also announced that he would go on publishing leaflets until the limit of 40 was reached or until an opponent came out in good faith in the field of contest (see Dard).

August 25th, 1900
Pir Mehr Ali Shah arrived in Lahore for his contest with MGA, however, MGA was a no-show.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Saif-e-Chishtiyai is published in 1902

This book is part of the controversy between MGA and Pir Mehr Ali Shah.  This book played a major role in MGA’s famous court case of 1904 vs. Maulvi Karam Din.

The book
7 Saif e Chishtiayee HQ

Some quotes
This excerpt is from page 66, where the author asks Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to not abuse him and whatever comes out from his mouth, as God’s words are also spoken by him.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Ahmadiyya sources on Saif-e-Chishtiyai

https://www.alislam.org/r.php?q=Saif-e-Chishtiyai+%28The+Chishtia+Sword%29%2C

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and related essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/16/nuzul-ul-masih-or-the-descent-of-the-messiah-published-posthumously-in-1909-and-quotes/

http://wiki.qern.org/mirza-ghulam-ahmad/publications/roohani-khazain/nuzool-ul-masih

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLj63tAGOCE

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/18/hazrat-pir-meher-ali-shahs-fight-against-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karam

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B77FjScd2BWhQk4tV2hCZDJuVGM/edit

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/05/01/shams-ul-hidaya-by-pir-mehr-ali-shah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/03/25/while-mga-was-beefing-with-pir-mehr-ali-shah-he-stopped-making-prayers-5-times-a-day/

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad called the killing of Maulvi Abdul Latif as greater than that of Imam Hussain

Intro
MGA disrespected many famous personalities in Islam, Christianity and Judaism. MGA also disliked the female name Fatima, the daughter of Muhammad (saw), this is why #ahmadis never name their daughters as Fatima. MGA argued that she had bad luck, and thus, he disliked her name. MGA also disrespected Fatima’s (ra) children, Hassan and Hussain. MGA also disrespected Ali (ra).

The conversion of Syed Abdul Latif to Ahmadiyya and his subsequent state killing is a strange subject. Syed Abdul Latif was supposed to go to Mecca for Hajj, for that the government of Afghanistan had given him lots of money and 6 months of vacation time. However, somehow,
Syed Abdul Latif went to Qadian and lived in the company of MGA for 6 months. This is very strange, it is possible that he was working directly for the British government.  He even came into contact with an Arab who was also visiting Qadian. Towards the end of 1902, MGA was summoned to Jhelum in connection with the Karam Din defamation case. Syed Abdul Latif traveled with MGA to Jhelum to assist MGA in his court case. Syed Abdul Latif was put to death by the Afghan government on July 14th, 1903. In “Tadhkiratu-Shahadatain”(1903)–English translation, MGA erroneously wrote that Syed Abdul Latif was imprisoned for 4 months, that proved to be wrong, Ahmad Noor Kabuli came to Qadian (November-December 1903) after the publishing of “Tadhkiratu-Shahadatain”(1903)–English translation and told MGA that Syed Abdul Latif was only imprisoned for 1 1/2 months. Even the English Review of Religions wrote that Syed Abdul Latif was imprisoned for 4 months (See RoR-english, Nov/Dec 1903 edition). His story is also discussed in the english-ROR of November-1912, see pages 452-454.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

The reference
MALFOOZAT Volume 3 page 496 and Volume 4 page 364

“”Sahibzada Abdul Latif left behind good example, if examined carefully his incident is greater than the incident of Hazrat Imam Hussian a.s. because Imam Hussain a.s. Was neither imprisoned nor chained it was only a war where Imam Hussain had an army and if His men were killed, the army of Imam Hussain killed the soldiers of other side as well. Contrary to that Molvi Abdul Latif sb was imprisoned with chained hands and feet. There was no chance of escape for him. The martyrdom of Molvi Abdul Latif is such a great martyrdom that it has no other example in 13 centuries of Islamic history””.

Scans


See also the English-ROR, page 407 1903
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Malfoozat vol 1, page no 133, latest edition

“Shia religion is strongly opposed to Islam”

The scan work

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/11/syed-abdul-latif-accompanied-mga-to-jhelum-in-january-of-1903/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/11/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-terrible-arabic-pronunciation-and-syed-abdul-lateef/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Karam

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/The-Afghan-Martyrs-by-B.A.Rafiq.pdf

https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1154&context=afghanuno

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Al-Fazl, September 1917, proves Ahmadiyya Takfir towards all Sunni’s/Shia’s

Intro
Ahmadiyya takfir is a tricky subject, most people haven’t properly understood it.  Feel free to read all our entries on this topic here:  https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Takfir. Continue reading “Al-Fazl, September 1917, proves Ahmadiyya Takfir towards all Sunni’s/Shia’s”

“Mirzaiyat se Taubah” on in english as”Repentance from Mirza’s religion” by Dr. Abdullah Khan Akhtar

Intro
Dr. Abdullah Khan Akhtar a resident of Jatoi Distt Muzaffar Garh Punjab then British India, now Pakistan, was an eighth class student before partition of India in 1947.

At that time Choudhry Abdullah Khan, brother of Zafrullah Khan, was a Punchayat Officer in District Muzaffar Garh. He got a teacher of the School converted to Qadianism and this Qadiani Teacher placed trap on young Abdullah Khan Akhtar to make him Qadiani, sent him to Qadian for further studies with recommendation letters of Ch. Abdullah.Young Abdullah Khan Akhtar entered into qadiani pledge at the hand of Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmoud who was Khalifa at that time.

After completion of education Akhtar was sent to Malaya Singapore as an Ahmadi Muballigh. He returned to Qadian from there after 3 1/2 years tenure and got married in a notable family of Qadian. He kept on his mission of ahmadiyya tabilgh across india, In Mumbai, Agra, Mongir, Shahjehanpur, Lucknow, Putna and in Punjab. He debated with Molana Lal Hussain Akhtar Ex ahmadi in Sargodha and Jhang after partition. Strongly opposed Tehreek Khatme Nabuwwat of 1953.

After the Tehreek Khatme Nabuwwat the court of Enquiry was set up which called Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmoud Khalifa of Qadianis, for statement and cross questioning. The statement of Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmoud caught Akhtar by surprise and he started to revisit his views about the Ahmadiyya.

Following were the Questions and answers between Court of Enquiry and Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmoud:-

COE. If someone, After having a careful look at the claims of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani, denies them, will he remain a muslim?

MBM. Yes He would be considered a muslim in general terms.

COE. In your witness you have said that one would continue to remain a muslim even if he do not believes in Mirza sb honestly. Is it your belief since the beginning?

MBM: yes.

Do you consider Mirza sb among those appointed/ messengers, no body can be called muslim without believing in them.?

MBM. I have already replied to this question that any body who do not believe in Mirza sb can not be called to be out of the pail of Islam.

COE: whether believing in Mirza sb is a part of IMAN?

MBM: No.

These Question answers were published in a book (at pages 10 to 32, ) under Darul Tajleed Urdu Bazar Lahore with photograph of Khalifa sb on title page.

These answers were shocking for Akhtar as these were against the basic instructions of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani and in contradiction of writings of khalifa sb himself and in blatant negation of basic ahmadi beliefs.

Dr. Abdullah Khan Akhtar then left ahmadiyya reverted to Islam and sought repentance of Allah for adopting a false religion and started tabligh e Islam among ahmadis to compensate for his being part of Ahmadiyya activities in a long period of his life.

He wrote a book titled as MIRZAIYAT SE TAUBAH.

 

No automatic alt text available.
No automatic alt text available.
No automatic alt text available.
No automatic alt text available.
No automatic alt text available.

Up ↑