Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Month

February 2019

MGA’s failure to speak at the Aligarh College in April of 1889

Intro
After accepting Bait’s from his followers in March of 1889, MGA immediately traveled to Aligarh and was scheduled to give a speech to many Professor’s, Sir Syed would also be in attendance. However, after MGA arrived in Aligarh, he never came out of his apartment for daily prayers, then, just a few hours before his speech, he declined and abruptly left for Qadian. This was before Noorudin and Maulvi Abdul Karim had began giving speeches on MGA’s behalf. They had just taken his Bait however. Mir Abbas Ali Ludhianvi, Abdullah Sanori and Sheikh Hamid Ali accompanied him on this journey (see Mujadid-e-Azim, page 278). MGA stayed in Aligarh for just a week, after which he returned to Ludhiana. In Aligarh, he was the guest of Tafazul Hussain, Tehsildar, who was at the time serving as the Superintendent of the Deputy Commissioner’s office. There were a couple of report-worthy incidents in Aligarh (IBID). The name of the speech was supposed to be “The Truth of Islam”. This trip is mentioned in the ROR of June-July-1940. MGA and his team returned to Qadian on April-18-1889.

As we all know, MGA never gave any public lectures in his whole life, before 1889 or after. MGA always had a follower of his read out these ready made speeches, which were written by MGA’s team of writers. The main reason that MGA never did public speeches or Friday Sermons or etc was because he spoke with a terrible stutter. In fact, MGA’s team went out of their way to fabricate speeches that MGA might have given, like Khutba Ilhamia and other talks at the annual Jalsa’s at Qadian. Even before Khutbah Ilhamia, MGA never led any Eid prayer, he would simply get up to speak and say a few words after the main speech, see MGA’s Eid of 1888. MGA’s widow (Nusrat Jehan) related a wild story (in 1923 via Seeratul Mahdi) of MGA of in roughly 1888, wherein MGA had an attack of schizophrenia and saw a black thing fly up into the sky.

In 1891, (see Victory of Islam, RK-3, page 17, footnote-Urdu)(See page 61 of the English edition) MGA stated that he had mental weakness (Maradh dhu’f e Dimaagh) that was untreated and not cured. He also states this this weakness prevented him from speaking about the reality of Islam at the Aligarh University in 1889. MGA didn’t give this speech. Listen to Dr. Holy Spirit’s explanation of MGA would scream and fall herein (narration via Seeratul Mahdi).

The Civil and Military Gazette of Feb-11-1892 reports that MGA was in Lahore and was being seen for under the treatment of a leading physician. MGA is reported to have a brain disorder. 14 years later, Dr. Daniels made similar observations. MGA had many attacks of Schizophrenia in this era too.

In 1900, MGA mentioned Maulavi Muhammad Isma‘il of Aligarh 5 times in Arba’in.

In 1906, Dr. Daniels made similar observations.


Continue reading “MGA’s failure to speak at the Aligarh College in April of 1889”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the Splitting of the Moon incident of Muhammad

Intro
MGA copied Sir Syed’s entire playbook when it came to denying miracles and the unlimited abilities of Allah. It was Sir Syed who first wrote that Esa (as) was dead and never returning, he also wrote that the concept of the “Mahdi” was totally false and nothing more than Muslims exaggerating about their greatness. Ahmadi’s are known to waffle on this subject and many more. Normally, Ahmadi’s reject all miracles and give them a “rational-explanation”, totally downgrading their status as miracles and call them all as rare natural phenomenon. MGA had the famous incident of the red drops appearing out of thin air, this was boasted by MGA as a total miracle with divine help.

In 1882-1884, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was indirectly denying Quran 3:49, as he denied the miracles of Esa (as).

In 1886, in MGA’s book, “Surma Chashma Arya”, MGA called the physicality of the splitting of the moon by arguing that it was a rare natural phenomenon, he did the same in terms of the miraculous Birth of Jesus also, he also defended the fire-incident that was related about Abraham, MGA also called that a rare phenomenon. MGA waited til 1891, then, he rejected the physicality of the Miraaj, and many other miracles that were divinely ordained.

In terms of the splitting of the moon, it comes from the Quran, Chapter 54:1-2. It is also mentioned in many Sahih hadiths. In 1892, in Ainah Kamalate Islam, MGA again concurred that Muhammad (saw) did in fact pray for miracles and had many, the splitting of the moon is mentioned, however, at this juncture, MGA and his team didn’t go into detail, they also mentioned how Muhammad (saw) was able to feed many and hydrate many from a simple cup or bucket (see the reference in the below). MGA was denying the islamic concept of miracles and claiming that they were all rare natural phenonmenon.

In 1902, in “I‘jaz-e-Ahmadi”, MGA wrote a poem wherein he claimed that “For him (Muhammad) was shown the Sign of a lunar eclipse and for me, Of lunar and solar both. Will you persist in your denial?”. Even in Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya Volume-5, MGA’s team of writers dismissed the physicality of the splitting of the moon and called it a type of lunar eclipse. In 1909 via Nuzul Masih, the same argument is given.

Then, published in 1960, via Malfuzat, Volume-1, MGA is recorded 4-5 times confirming that the splitting of the moon and other miracles were a rare phenomenon, just not understood by humans yet, MGA even admonished people who counter-argued that this miracle was simply a type of Lunar Eclipse (see page 137).

In 2022, Mirza Masroor Ahmad was asked about miracles by an Ahmadi boy, the answer is strange and weird. The young boy was asking about the red drops incident of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. In response to this, and very ironically, Mirza Masroor Ahmad said that science can’t comprehend the spiritual realm. Mirza Masroor Ahmad was so confused he even said that 1+1=2 can’t be proven (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Mirza Masroor Ahmad also commented on the splitting of the Moon miracle by Muhammad (saw) and seems to have forgot that MGA eventually called it an eclipse.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the Splitting of the Moon incident of Muhammad”

“The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam”–book review

Intro
It seems that MGA and his team stole from Al-Ghazali when they presented “The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam” in 1896? Nevertheless, we present an evaluation of this lecture/book. Be advised, we only have Ahmadiyya sources on this specific topic, hence, most of this background data is dubious, however, Ahmadiyya sources do quote 5-6 British newspapers which only indicate that this event did take place and MGA’s speech was read out and applauded heavily (see Hidden Treasures).

On Page 2 of the book, MGA says that he won’t be referring to any hadith (translated as tradition). Thus, this book is from a Quranist perspective. However, on page 135, Muhammad (Saw) is quoted as describing Jannah (Heaven) as “bounties are such as no eye has seen, not has any ear heard, nor have they been conceived by the mind of man”. This seems to be a reference to hadith (found by Uncle Jamal ud Din from speakers corner).

On Page 4 of this book, MGA and his team of writers quoted 12:53 of the Quran (12:54 in the Kadiani Koran) and argued that Nafs al-Ammarah is an Islamic concept referring to the “commanding self” or “ego-driven self.  

On Page 5 of this book, MGA and his team of writers quoted 75:2 of the Quran (75:3 in the Kadiani Koran), in terms of Nafs al-Lawwamah (Arabic: النَّفْس اللَّوَّامَةِ) is the “self-reproaching” or “self-accusing” soul, which feels guilt and remorse for one’s wrongdoings.

On pages 6-7, MGA claimed that per 89:27-28, heaven could be achieved on Earth. MGA and his team of writers totally stole the Sir Syed position on heaven and called all of its descriptions as symbolic (see page 154), 47:15 of the Quran is quoted (47:16 in the Qadiani Quran). Malik Ghulam Farid wrote the same in 1988 via his official 5-volume commentary of the Quran. Also on page-6,

On page 13), MGA and his team of writers alleged that soul (ruh) is created in human sperm (naozobillah).

On page 51, MGA and his team quoted 4:10 of the Quran (4:11 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that in Islam the description of the punishment for those who steal property is a blazing fire. MGA argues that this punishment teaches its adherents to be morally upright and listed this scenario as 1 out of 5 ways to maintain chastity in humans.

On page 89, MGA and his team argued that via 36:40 of the Quran (36:41 in the Kadiani Koran), the sun and moon travel in an orbit.

On page 120, MGA alleged that the “blazing fire” (wa sagheera) only means that for those who reject the truth and have no inclination towards accepting it, not an actual fire. Ahmadi’s also allege that via 101:09 (101:10 in the Kadiani Koran), means that Hell is like a mother (fa-ummohoo) with her infant, and have mistranslated the verse accordingly. However, per Ibn Kathir, the verse can be translated as Hell is your mother (His mother will be Hawiyah.)

On page 154, MGA and his team of writers quoted 47:15 of the Quran (47:16 in the Qadiani Quran)(totally stole the Sir Syed position) and argued that all the descriptions of heaven are metaphoric.

On pages 169 and 191, MGA claimed that per 10:64 of the Quran (10:65 in the Kadiani Koran) the friends of God receive glad tidings in this life through revelation and converse with God and will also have the same experience in the Hereafter.

In reality, this book was penned by MGA’s team at Qadian and delivered in a speech at Lahore by Maulvi Abdul Kareem. Khawaja Kamaluddin [who later left Qadiani Jama’at] brought a message to MGA that they should write something. MGA was sick as usual, he seems to have ordered his team to write something for this occasion, Dard claims that MGA had a severe attack of diarrhea as he tried to write this lecture (page 477). Khawaja Kamaluddin was not happy with the exposition and expressed a sense of hopelessness and felt it would be mocked and derided (See Dard pages 477-478)(See the ROR of Nov-1942 also). However, Ahmadi sources claims that their God had already informed MGA that his exposition would excel so he had some posters published about the exposition and assured Khawaja Kamaluddin about it and asked him to put up the posters in Lahore. Khawaja Kamaluddin had made his mind up about the exposition so he withheld putting up the posters and only did so at the very end when others insisted. He put up a few posters high up on walls the night before so that no one could see them because he thought the exposition was not worthy to be read at the convention.

The Conference of Great Religions (called the Dharma Mahotsu in the ROR of Nov-1942) was eventually held on December 26, 27, 28, 1896, and it was extended to December 29 and in Lahore (MGA mentions it 10+ times in “Siraj-e-Munir” (published in March-1897). However, when the exposition was read out at the convention, as we know, MGA’s paper won, however, the judges were overly sympathetic to Ahmadiyya, in fact, the person who gave up his time so that Maulvi Abdul Kareem could keep reading was Maulvi Mubarak Ali of Sialkot, who had many sympathies to the Ahmadiyya Movement. The appointed time for the exposition passed but the audience remained ever eager. The time was extended, so much so that in order to accommodate the exposition the convention had to be extended by a day. Khawaja Kamaluddin was an educated man, he was a lawyer, and he knew that this paper was not good at all. This story is also covered by Muhammad Ali and Mirza Basheer-ud-Din Mahmud in the era of 1915-1924, as they criticized each other extensively. Did MGA‘s team steal from Al-Ghazali when they presented “The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam” in 1896? In this book, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad alleged that Muhammad (Saw) said that if someone see’s him, it’s as-if they saw Allah (naozobillah).

In 1910, MGA’s famous book, “Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam” is translated into english by Maulvi Muhammad Ali and published as, “The Teachings of Islam”, Mr. Muhammad Alexander Webb is given credit as someone who helped in the translation. This was the second english translation of “Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam. Although Webb acknowledged Ghulam Ahmad as “a man of God” and the one who had guided him to Islam, however, it should be noted that this was before MGA’s claims and a total lie, since Alexander Russell Webb couldn’t read Urdu. Nevertheless, Singleton claims that Webb stayed in touch with Ahmadi’s until his death in 1916. The english ROR of Oct-1915 began quoting a statement by Alexander Webb From New Jersey. This went on for many years and ended in Dec-1923.

The ROR of Sep-1911 tells the world that this book can be bought from London also, at this address: Messrs. Luzac and Co., 46 Great Russell Street, London, W.C.

The ROR of July-1912 has many book reviews of “The Teachings of Islam”, even one from Mary Hunt.

The ROR of March-April-1916 reports that “The Teachings of Islam” is set to get translated into Tamil.

The ROR of Sep-1916 reports that Brother Dr. Abdullah from Rouen has been spreading the French translation of “The Teachings of Islam”.

The ROR of May-1918 reports that Qazi Abdullah has given a Belgian officer a French translation of the “Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam”. It’s unclear as to who translated this. “Our Foreign Missions” 1961 edition reports that a second edition of a chinese language version of “Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam” was published in the early 1960’s.

In 1921, Maulvi Muhammad Ali published a 2nd edition (from Lahore, not Qadian) of his English translation of the “The Teachings of Islam” (aka the “Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam”. There doesn’t seem to be many changes, in fact, the old preface is also used. The same note on Alexander Webb is given from the 1910 edition.

In 1957, Ahmadiyya sources claim to have also created a Burmese translation. This book is also mentioned in the ROR of Jan-1940 and Nov-1940.

The ROR of Nov-1940 alleges that Maulvi Sanaullah and Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi were in attendance when the speech was given by Maulvi Abdul Karim, which ended up becoming the book, “Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam”. The ROR of Nov-1940 alleges that it has been translated into English, Arabic, French, Gujrati, Hindi, Bengali, Malay, Sumatri, Chinese, Sindhi, German, Burmese, Kantari, Gurmukhi, Marhatti, Malyalam, Tamil, Telugu, Urdu, Balandi and Sunda.

The ROR of Feb-1944 mentions the conference wherein this book was read out. The ROR of Feb-1947 mentions it. The Muslim Sunrise of the 4th Quarter-1956 mentions how the Spanish Government banned the distribution of the Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam.


Continue reading ““The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam”–book review”

Who is Muhammadi Begum? 1875–1966

Intro
Per Ahmadiyya sources she was a triple-niece of MGA. MGA was her uncle in 3 ways and maybe more, MGA’s sister (Murad Bibi) was married to her (Muhammadi Begum‘s) paternal big uncles. Per Ahmadiyya sources, she was born in 1874/75 (see Dard, page 330). She was thus 13-14 when MGA was asking to marry her per Ahmadiyya sources, however, she was most likely 9-10. MGA had most likely seen her as an infant, since he was her uncle in 3-4 ways, thus, he had seen her a lot. She seems to have been from Aima, this is also wherein MGA’s mother (Charagh Bibi) was from.

From 1840-1855, MGA went to Aima many times in his youth. Her father was Mirza Ahmad Baig Hoshiarpur and her mother was Umar un-Nisa (the sister of Imam ud Din). MGA and Mirza Ahmad Baig seem to have been friendly to each other even after MGA had his war with his cousins over land.

Nevertheless, in 1888, Mirza Ahmad Baig met with MGA and asked MGA to sign over “lucrative” property rights which belonged to MGA’s cousin, Mirza Ghulam Hussain, who’s son, Mirza Ghulam Haider had went missing around 1865, and was co-incidentally married to Mirza Ahmad Baig’s sister. MGA responded by asking to marry Mirza Ahmad Baig’s 13-14-year old daughter, Mirza Ahmad Baig immediately refused. This kicked off a public war wherein the entire Mirza family was opposed to MGA. In fact, it is not too far-fetched to say that the life and career of MGA was shaped by his love of Muhammadi Begum. Birth of sons, death threats against others, Batalvi feud, Christian feud (Christian paper published letters to Muhammadi Begum family) which led to the Atham saga, which then led to the maseel maseeh and maseeh mauood stuff. MGA kept upping the ante. The whole ‘promised son’ seems like a ruse to get Muhammadi Begum’s dad interested in him, implying that if Muhammadi Begum marries MGA, the son would be the inheritor to all of his spiritual and worldly legacy (See Dard, page 172)(See Nur Afshan of 10 May 1888 and pages 2 and 3, via “Ainah Kamalate Islam, online English edition, page 319).

In 1888 to 1892, the Mirza family feud was in the Nur Afshan.

In 1890-1891, MGA and his team of writers alleged that ultimately the elder daughter of Mirza Ahmad Beg, son of Mirza Ghulam Beg of Hoshiarpur would be married to me. These people would resort to great hostility and would place obstacles in the way, but in the end, it would surely take place. The Exalted God would, by all possible means, bring her to me, whether as a virgin or a widow, and would remove all impediments, and would, of necessity, fulfil this task, and none would be able to prevent it (See Izala Auham, roughly 1890, RK-3, page 198)(Izalah Auham, p.296, older edition, via B.A. Rafiq, “Truth About Ahmadiyya, online version, https://www.alislam.org/book/truth-about-ahmadiyyat/prophecy-relating-muhammadi-begum/, Prophecy relating to Muhammadi Begum, Retrieved on 6-7-19)(Newest edition, RK V-3, page 305-306, Izala Auham page 398).

In 1892, Muhammadi Begum was married Sultan Muhammad on April 7th, 1892 (see Dard, page 334). Ahmad Baig died on 9-30-1892.

In 1893, after Ahmad Baig died, MGA mentioned him 20+ times in “Ainah Kamalate Islam” (See online English edition). MGA incorrectly wrote that Ahmad Baig died on 9-31-1892 (this date doesn’t exist). MGA also wrote that this happened within 4 months, per the original prophecy, however, it wasn’t within 4 months. It was within 6 months, thus, in the second edition of “Ainah Kamalate Islam”, 4 months was changed to 6 months (See the scans in the below).

In 1897, MGA mentioned the Ahmad Baig prophecy is also mentioned (see pages 62 and 124, Siraj-e-Munir, online English edition). Also in 1897, in Anjam-e-Athim, MGA mentions his prophecy vs. his cousins and other close relations (See Zamima Anjam e Atham, RK v. 12, p.337).

In 1899, MGA gets a revelation, “A virgin and a widow”, MGA alleges that this Muhammadi Begum’s husband dying and becoming a widow and MGA marrying her [See Tiryaqul-Qulub, p. 34, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 15, p. 201](See Also, the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, pages 50-51).

In 1901, MGA spoke about Muhammadi Begum and alleged that She will inevitably come to my wedlock (See Al-Hakam, Aug-10-1901).

In 1902, MGA alleged that part of the prophecy vs. Muhammadi Begum was fulfilled via the death of Ahmad Baig (her father) and MGA was waiting for the second part to be completed  (See “Ijazi i Ahmadi” or “The Miracle of Ahmad”, the 2019 online english edition, page 16).

In 1902, Imam Bibi dies, she owned portions of the land that belonged to MGA’s family and started all of this trouble with Muhammadi Begum. MGA discusses this story in Nuzul ul Masih (1909). Thus, the land of Mirza Ghulam Haidar reverted back to his cousins. MGA then bought out his other cousins and got all of the land and buildings, which seem to be right next door to MGA’s mansion (See Nuzulul-Masih, pp. 213–214, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 18, pp. 591–592(via the 2009 online english edition of Tadhkirah).

In 1905, MGA was claiming that Muhammadi Begum would still eventually come into his Nikkah, see the video by Amir Haq herein, at the 16:56 mark. MGA was asked why Muhammadi got married to the other guy, and mga says that the revelation doesn’t say that she won’t marry (See June 3rd, 1905–Al-Hakam, page-2).

In 1906-1907, via “Haqiqatul Wahi”, MGA mentions Mirza Ahmad Baig on pages, 219-220, 231, 233, 237, 238, 280, 492, 493, 576, 577, 696, 697, 710, 714, 715. MGA basically says that even though Muhammadi Begum was still alive and married with children, the prophecy was conditional and thus fulfilled.

In 1908, MGA alleged that one part of the prophecy was nullified (Badr, 23 April 1908, p.4).

In 1908 (Oct), via Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya Vol. 5 is published. MGA mentions Ahmad Baig on pages, 254, 255, 494, 495.

In 1909, via “Nuzul ul Maseeh” (See pages 247-248), the Ahmad Baig prophecy is mentioned.

In 1947, Muhammadi Begum, her husband, family and extended family move to Lahore by force via partition.

In 1966, Muhammadi Begum died on 19 November, at Lahore, her funeral prayer was led by Molana Shahabuddin of Chowburji who was a disciple of Shaikhul Hind Molana Mahmoodul Hasan. She was buried in Qabrustan Miyani Sahib Lahore.

In 2022, her grave was found by Khalid Mateen and his team of workers with KTV.


Continue reading “Who is Muhammadi Begum? 1875–1966”

The old tomb of Jesus website, Maulvi Abdullah, Khalifa Noorudin and MGA

Intro
Dear readers, about 10-15 years ago, some Ahmadi made a website called “tombofjesus”.  When the tomb of Yuz Asaf was discovered by some Ahmadi’s (1895 or 1896), it was argued by Maulvi Shaikh Abdullah (the lawyer) who was an inhabitant of Kashmir, that since this tomb was that of a prophet, that eliminated all muslims from the equation, thus it must belong to a Jewish prophet.  Muslims strictly believe that the HP was the final prophet, there were no more prophets to come. Muslims only had one prophet, on the other hand the jewish people had many prophets, in other words because of the concept of khatme-nubuwwat, this had to be a jewish prophet. When HMGA recieved this data he also used the ending of prophethood as his main argument in terms of proving that Yus Asaf was not a muslim.
Continue reading “The old tomb of Jesus website, Maulvi Abdullah, Khalifa Noorudin and MGA”

Who is the British Military Officer Captain Montague William Douglas?

Intro
Captain Montague William Douglas also known as M.W. Douglas, District Magistrate, District Gurdaspur in 1897. Lt. Col Montagu William Douglas CSI, CIE. (1863 – February 1957) was a British soldier and colonial administrator in India. As the Assistant District Commissioner in the Punjab, he investigated the attempted murder allegation made by Henry Martyn Clark against Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement. Ahmad later declared him to be the “Pilate of our time”, superior to the original. In his later life he was a noted advocate of the Oxfordian theory of Shakespeare authorship and was president of the Shakespeare Fellowship for many years. He is mentioned in detail in the ROR of Nov-1935, the 2nd Khalifa admits that even Captain Douglas knew that MGA was guilty, however, he went out of his way to clear MGA of all the charges. In 1939, he met with the Ahmadi mullah JD Shams and even presided on a Jalsa in the UK, hence he proved that he colluded with MGA to exonerate him. In 1897, he was a captain in the British Military as well as a judge, in fact, all British officers doubled as corrupt Judges.

He was born to Edward Douglas, (1831–1867) and Annie Arbuthnot, (b. 1831). In February 1884 he joined the 1st Battalion, North Staffordshire Regiment, switching to the Indian army in 1887. He was promoted to captain in 1895.

In 1891, Douglas married Helen Mary Isabelle Downer (b. 1863). They had three children, Edward Montagu Douglas (b. 1891), Major Archibald Stair Montagu Douglas, MM, (1897–1974),[1] and Helen Elizabeth Douglas (b. 1893).[2][3]

Douglas 1936 Daily Sketch
Continue reading “Who is the British Military Officer Captain Montague William Douglas?”

Why do Ahmadi’s think that eating swine causes homosexuality?

Intro
Check out my video on this topic herein. And my tik tok herein.
Ahmadi’s have been going around for the past 100 years and claiming that the eating of swine makes a person Gay, or LGBTQ. Where did this come from? Where did Ahmadi’s get this from?  MGA and his team of writers composed “The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam” in 1896, in this very book these people ascribed foul and shameless human habits as a direct result of eating swine (pork)(see page 39-40). However, this theory is totally wrong, homosexuality is prevalent in Afghanistan and Pakistan, wherein there is a Muslim majority of 98%, and swine (pork) is totally banned, thus, this Ahmadiyya-unique-idea is ridiculous. In fact, many Ahmadi’s in Pakistan are Gay, and they have never ate pork. Furthermore, the 2nd Khalifa was accused of Gay-behaviors back in 1903 and the 1930’s.

Homosexuality has been rampant in Ahmadiyya since the 1930’s. The Khalifa was laying with men and women in that era. In fact, he ordered the murder of Fakhur-ud-din Multani, since he accused the Khalifa of raping him. However, outwardly, the Ahmadiyya policy is against homosexuality. Ironically, homosexuality is also rampant among the men of Rabwah. Ahmadi’s are so ridiculous, they even believe that eating pork makes someone Gay, which is stupid since homosexuality is rampant in afghanistan and pakistan, wherein virtually no pork is ever eaten.

Continue reading “Why do Ahmadi’s think that eating swine causes homosexuality?”

What is the Talim-ul-Islam-High School (college) at Qadian and later at Rabwah?

Intro
This was the school that MGA started in 1897. They tried to turn it into a College in 1904, but the British government shut it down officially in 1907. It operated as a young men’s school (Jamia and Madrassa) and housing area from 1907 to 1944. There were accusations of rampant homosexuality at this school also, which seems to be the reason it was shut down in 1907. There was also a College launched (launched in 1903) with the same name that was shut down by the British Government in 1905, via the University Act of 1907. Some Ahmadi’s masturbated in Qadian, in front of Maulvi Noorudin, they didn’t care.

Remember, in 1909, the British government built the biggest building in the history of Qadian as they donated 25,000 rupees to the Ahmadiyya Movement at Qadian. This allowed the Ahmadiyya movement to purchase 50 acres of land as Noorudin ordered the building of the College, with hostel space, the first Jamia and the famous Nur Hospital and the famous Nur Mosque. From 1913 to 1922, the annual Jalsa Salana’s were held at the Noor mosque (See ROR of Jan-1947). The ROR of Jan-1947 alleges that in 1922, the number of guests rose to 7000-8000 and thus, a new location was needed to hold the Jalsa. Thus, from 1922 onwards, a Pandal was prepared annaually in front of the T.I. Highschool (in the spacious open field outside of the city limits of Qadian). The ROR alleges that in 1945, 1944 and 1943, 34,000 people attended the Jalsa at Qadian, this would be during WW-2.

If it wasn’t for the British government this huge facility would have never been built. The ROR of June-1915 alleges that the buildings and site costed 75,000, oh which Ahmadi’s have given 40,000 rupees and the British Government the remaining 35,000. It reports that there are 400 students of which half are living in the attached hostel. Ahmadiyya sources claim that this school is an english school and attached to the accreditation of the Punjab University. The British Government is paying 400 rupees per month for the maintenance of these facilities. In fact, the attached hostel costed an additional 60,000 rupees, of which the British Government paid half, it is alleged that the Ahmadiyya Movement paid the other 30,000 rupees (which is a lie, the British most likely paid for everything). Carpentry and tailoring is also taught at this school.

The ROR of February-1916 reports that the Ahmadiyya missionary training Madrassa was opened in late 1914. It also reports that 400 children are currently enrolled at the Ahmadiyya High school. It claims that the Ahmadiyya Madrassa is an arabic and theology school combined. It also claims to be managed by the Sadr Anjuman at Qadian.

In roughly 1944, the British government opened up the Indian Air Training Course (IAT) in Qadian at the T.I. College in the 1940’s, this was the first ever pilot training center outside of the UK. The ROR of Nov-1946 alleges that the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s have about 30 schools in British-India. They allege that the Talim-ul-Islam Highschool at Qadian has 1700 students and has been raised to a degree college. They also allege that the Madrassa-i-Ahmadiyya, Jamia Ahmadiyya and Jamia Nusrat have been raised up to a degree college. All of the institutions at Qadian are listed.

It opened at Rabwah after partition and was referred to as T.I. College. In Qadian, the old building that used to house the T.I. College is now the The Sikh National College at Qadian, since 1947-1950 era.


Continue reading “What is the Talim-ul-Islam-High School (college) at Qadian and later at Rabwah?”

What is “Hyat-e-Qudsi” by Maulana Ghulam Rasool Qudsi Rajecki?

Intro
There was yet another famous follower of MGA named Maulana Ghulam Rasool Qudsi Rajecki.  Also spelled as Rajeki or Rajki. He wrote a book entitled, “Hyat-e-Qudsi”. In this book he mentions how he would see dreams wherein it seemed that Maulvi Noorudin face looked like that of the Prophet Muhammad (saw). This comes from an era wherein Ahmadi’s thought that MGA was really the second coming of Muhammad (Saw) and MGA’s wife was really the wife of Muhammad (Saw) (naozobillah). There is a famous quote in the below wherein Rajecki met with the wife of MGA (Nusrat Jehan) in Lahore.

He also wrote in this book about a dream that he had wherein the first ever majority Ahmadi country would be Afghanistan. We have also posted quotes from this book in the very bottom in terms of

An Ahmadi tells us,: I was once discussing with beloved Huzoor a number of passages from Hayat-e-Qudsi [a well-known autobiography of an illustrious companion of the Promised Messiah (as), Ghulam Rasul Rajeki, and I touched upon the subject of spiritual experiences. The autobiography seeks to inspire its readers of the miracles of Islam to be gained through belief in Islam Ahmadiyya and the Promised Messiah. After having read the accounts of this companion, I could not help but ask, if this was the example of a mere disciple, how great, then must the spiritual experiences of the Khulafa’ be! And since God Himself had adorned beloved Huzoor with the mantle of Khilafat, I was much intrigued to learn about such spiritual experiences from beloved Huzoor-e-Anwar himself. And so one day, I enquired about this matter and Huzoor disclosed to me that at times while he prays for certain individuals during his Salat prayers, Allah can sometimes make them appear right before him. I am certain that incidents of this kind are not rare occurrences for beloved Huzoor; rather, it is likely to be one example out of the many diverse and highly spiritual worlds he enters on a daily basis. Spiritual Experiences of Beloved Huzoor– (An article by Murtaza Ahmad), (Printed in Review Of Religions 30th May 2021). Continue reading “What is “Hyat-e-Qudsi” by Maulana Ghulam Rasool Qudsi Rajecki?”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑