ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad loved to curse his opponents. His favorite method of cursing was to call someone as a “children of a prostitutes” (Zurrayatul Baghaya), or bitch or pig, or to call a man a woman or womanly. There are so many instances. MGA even called the wife of his first cousin as a prostitute, the Ahmadiyya editing team edited this out also, however, we have found it.  It seems that in 1897, MGA and his team called Sa’dullah as a son of prostitutes (ibn Bagha).

In Feb-1907, After Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana died (he died in Jan-1907), MGA mentioned him in the Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 12, dated 24 February 1907 (See also Malfuzat-9, online English edition, pages 146-148). MGA and his team of writers quoted MGA’s poem from Anjam e Athim wherein Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana was referred to as “ibn bagha” (son of zina). In this utterance, MGA alleges that Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana had indirectly entered a Mubahila with MGA which caused Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana to die 10 years later. In Dec-2025, Maulvi Razi alleged (24:20 time stamp) that MGA wrote that when he used “ibn bagha” for Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana in 1898, MGA meant “sarkash insan”. In 2023, here razi claims mga translated “ibn e baghay” as “sarkash insan” (9:33 timestamp).

As Haqiqatul Wahi was published (May-1907), MGA claimed that Sa’dullah died of plague and mubahila. MGA also purposely left out his poetry wherein he called Sa’dullah as the son of prostitutes (ibn Bagha)(See page 446 and 450 of the Appendix of Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi (RK- 22, Urdu) and see pages, 554, 559 and 564 of the English edition). Mirza Bashir Ahmad claims that Muhammad Ali advised MGA to leave this out, in fear of legal recourse, i.e. the son of Sa’dullah might have sued for defamation. Dard tells us it was Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din and not Muhammad Ali however (See the al-Hakam, volume 38, number 7, February 28, 1935, pages 3–4, narrating the eye-witness accounts of Maulavi Muhammad Ibrahim Baqapuri, via the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah and via Seeratul Mehdi, page 31 part 1).
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad called Maulvi Sa’dullah as the son of a prostitute (1897) in Anjam-e-Athim” →

Intro
At 2:34:44, Bro Imtiaz explains how MGA called Saadullah as a “Mohannas”.

As soon as MGA made his wild claims of Messiah-ship in late 1890, many Muslims came forward and challenged MGA to debates and etc. Maulvi Sa’dullah was one such Muslim he was a convert to Islam from Hinduism and worked as the school master at the Christian Mission School at Ludhiana. Ahmadiyya sources claim that MGA made a prophecy about Sa’dullah in a book called “Anwar-ul-Islam” (Urdu) which was published in 1894, 3 years after MGA had his initial altercation with Sa’dullah.

In 1897, MGA wrote some poetry vs. Sa’dullah to the effect that God should make a decision between them, he also called Sa’dullah as the son of prostitutes (Ibn Bagha). Adnan Rashid discussed this also (Check out Part-2 herein [“Zarrayatul baghaya” and “Waladul Haraam” are discussed] and on the Dawah wise channel).

In Feb-1907, After Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana died (he died in Jan-1907), MGA mentioned him in the Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 12, dated 24 February 1907 (See also Malfuzat-9, online English edition, pages 146-148). MGA and his team of writers quoted MGA’s poem from Anjam e Athim wherein Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana was referred to as “ibn bagha” (son of zina). In this utterance, MGA alleges that Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana had indirectly entered a Mubahila with MGA which caused Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana to die 10 years later. In Dec-2025, Maulvi Razi alleged (24:20 time stamp) that MGA wrote that when he used “ibn bagha” for Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana in 1898, MGA meant “sarkash insan”. In 2023, here razi claims mga translated “ibn e baghay” as “sarkash insan” (9:33 timestamp).

As Haqiqatul Wahi was published (May-1907), MGA claimed that Sa’dullah died of plague and mubahila. MGA also purposely left out his poetry wherein he called Sa’dullah as the son of prostitutes (ibn Bagha)(See page 446 and 450 of the Appendix of Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi (RK- 22, Urdu) and see pages, 554, 559 and 564 of the English edition). Mirza Bashir Ahmad claims that Muhammad Ali advised MGA to leave this out, in fear of legal recourse, i.e. the son of Sa’dullah might have sued for defamation. Dard tells us it was Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din and not Muhammad Ali however (See the al-Hakam, volume 38, number 7, February 28, 1935, pages 3–4, narrating the eye-witness accounts of Maulavi Muhammad Ibrahim Baqapuri, via the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah and via Seeratul Mehdi, page 31 part 1).

On Nov-10-1907, MGA and his team of writers published an announcement in the Al-Hakam and Al-Badr of Nov-10-1907 (See the scans in the below)(Via Majmua Ishtiharat, V-3, pages 461-467). Bro Imtiaz explained it in full detail herein (1:19:40). This announcement is about Maulvi Sanaullah, the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad and a new promised son (Musleh Maud?). In this announcement, MGA says that people are showing happiness at the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad. MGA says that people are saying that the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad is a sign that MGA lost a Mubahila (with Abdul Hakim Patialvi and Maulvi Sanaullah).

However, by 1935, Mirza Bashir Ahmad said: The lawyer was Khwajah Kamal-ud-Din. In al-Hakam, volume 38, number 7, February 28, 1935, pages 3–4, narrating the eye-witness accounts of Maulvi Muhammad Ibrahim Baqapuri (see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah). Sa’dullah is also mentioned in the ROR of March-1935.
Continue reading “Who is Maulvi Sa’adullah or Saadullah or Sa’dullah of Ludhiana (died Jan-1907)??” →

Intro
Ahmadiyya and the Mirza family are stuck in 1900, in terms of women’s rights and many other topics like physics, quantum mechanics, child marriage, abortion, loyalty, divorce, supporting colonialism and etc etc etc.  In terms of how a woman should be obedient to her husband, MGA was strict and mean.  He treated his wives harshly and never gave them a shred of respect.  We have a found a reference from Malfuzat which perfectly explains MGA’s position on this topic.  We found a book called, “Islam on Marital Rights” by Maulana Shaikh Mubarak Ahmad (1988).  This book is actually a speech that was given at the 1969 Rabwah Jalsa Salana.  Maulana Shaikh Mubarak Ahmad was the Ahmadiyya missionary in-charge of East Africa for many years.  In this book, Ahmadiyya leadership is telling Ahmadi women that they are forced to be obedient to their husbands, per Quran and Hadith.  However, this isn’t totally correct, Islam doesn’t exactly endorse this system, these verses and hadith have a context, that is farming communities, wherein men and women have defined roles, it doesn’t apply to situations wherein the wife and husband both work and share responsibilities.  I recommend that my readers read this book in its full entirety.

The quote from Malfuzat
See pages 15-16 of “Marital Rights”.

“””Calling upon the women to realize their duty of obedience to their husbands, the Promised Messiah (as) once said, “For the woman it is imperative that she should obey her husband.  The Holy Prophet (saw) has emphasized this so much that once he said. ‘For the woman it is imperative that she should obey her husband’.  The Holy Prophet has emphasized so much on this that once he said, ‘If a husband asked his wife to shift a heap of bricks from one place to another, and after she had done it, he told her to carry them back to the former place, she must do that without question’.

“This should be regarded as a act of cruelty on the part of the husband for similar obligations have been imposed upon men also in respect of their wives.  These obligations are so onerous that it looks as if the woman was placed on the throne and the man commanded to serve her and be at her beck and call for the procurement of everything she needs.” (Malfoozat: Vol. 8; pp. 441-445).

Scans

Links and Related Essays

Click to access Islam-on-Marital-Rights.pdf

Links and Related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/05/29/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-said-that-women-should-be-unquestionably-obedient-to-their-husbands/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/09/24/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-comments-on-simply-looking-at-women-and-hearing-their-voices/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/06/04/in-1925-as-the-ahmadiyya-khalifa-married-for-a-4th-time-he-said-that-women-should-not-work/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/03/13/the-mirza-family-sees-independent-and-working-women-as-a-curse/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/17/can-ahmadi-women-vote-for-the-khalifa/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/01/28/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-said-that-men-have-been-bestowed-greater-faculties-than-women/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Intro
In 2025, this book was mistranslated into English. Nurul-Haqq was a 2-part booklet written by MGA and his team of writers in 1894. Part-1 was published in February of 1894 (see Muhammad Ali’s, “Prophethood in Islam”, 1915). Noor-ul-Haq Part-2 was published on May 18, 1894, (see Mujadid e Azim, abridged english edition, page 507). This book is in Arabic only, however, the original also contained an Urdu translation. This book has never been translated into english (see Hidden Treasures). The audio book can be found herein.

It seems that MGA wrote this book vs. Padre Imad ud Din. In 1893, Padre Imad ud Din wrote “Tauzin Ul Aqwal”, which was a direct attack on MGA. Padre Imad ud Din was also poking fun at MGA about losing his debate with Athim. This is the same book wherein MGA’s team wrote Lanaat 1000 times. It seems that even Muslims were aligning with Christians vs. MGA, Maulavi Karam Din, Nizamud Din, Ilahi Bakhsh and Hamidullah Khan are also mentioned in this book.

In Part-1, MGA and his team never even mentioned any hadith about eclipses and etc, in fact, in 15 years as a writer, MGA had never connected the famous prophecy of the Mahdi with any hadith about eclipses. However, 14 years later in 1907, in Haqiqatul Wahy, MGA claimed to have predicted the eclipses in Nurul-Haqq Part-1, pages 35-38. NURUL-HAQQ (Part-1) is mentioned in the ROR of May-1947.

On page 48-49 of the online English edition of “Nur ul Haqq”, MGA called himself and his family as the “khadim” of the British Government. However, this was mis-translated as “supporter”.

Continue reading “NURUL-HAQQ (Part-1) quotes and background data” →

Intro
As we all know, after MGA claimed to be the Messiah in later 1890, he began a tirade of vulgar remarks towards those who rejected him. He even wrote out 1000 “lanaats” in 1894 as he was raging out of control. Nur ul Haq was an Arabic only book, however, there seems to have also been an urdu translation given with the original book. Our Arabic ex-Ahmadi friends like Hani Tahir and Ikrima Najami have been going through MGA’s arabic books and giving us some quotes which have never been given to the world ever before. These quotes are vulgar, you have been warned. Some other publications are also quoted. Additional quotes from Nurul-Haq can be found here. In 1892-1893, he used the term “Zurrayatul Baghaya” (children of prostitues) as he described in Arabic those who had rejected his claims of Messiah-ship. It should be remembered that there were barely 300 Ahmadi’s in those days. MGA then used the phrase “ibn-Bagha” as he referred to Maulvi Sa’dullah (in Anjam-e-Athim, 1897, (arabic only book), in his poetry. However, after Sa’dullah died in 1907, Muhammad Ali advised MGA to not reproduce that exact quote.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote vulgarities in Arabic also, new research from Arab Ex-Ahmadi’s” →

Intro
Shaikh Yacub Ali Irfani, also spelled as Sheikh Yakoob Ali Irfanee (And also known as Shaikh Yaqub Ali Torab) was an Ahmadi who worked as a major confidant and was on MGA’s team of writers/editors/imams.

In 1886, Yacub Ali Irfani seems to have been a student/assistant of Noorudin while he was in Jammu as early as 1886. Irfani wrote a note in a letter of Noorudin about a potential marriage between MGA and Noorudin’s pre-teen daughter.

In 1887, Ahmadiyya sources allege that the young Yaqub Ali Irfani had seen Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya in 1887 through Maulvi Ghulam Mohiyuddin Sahib – his teacher and headmaster at the Vernacular Middle School (See Maktubat-e-Ahmad, 2008, Vol. 2, p. 499).

In 1889, Yakoob Ali Irfanee is present at the very first Bait ceremony in Ludhiana but doesn’t take bait with MGA.

In 1892 (Feb), Yakoob Ali Irfanee did bait with MGA.

In 1893, “Yakub Ali, Sheikh, Torab, son of Sheikh Muhammad Ali passed his Entrance Examination as a private student. His father was a subordinate teacher in the Adampur Vernacular Middle School.

In 1894, he began work as Editor in Amritsar of the Riaz-i-Hind, Feroz, Ahluwalia Gazette, Jahan Numa and Punjab.

In 1896, Yacub Ali Irfani is NOT mentioned in the famous list of 313 Ahmadi’s. In 1896 he was selected as a special Police Officer to supervise Muharram arrangements.

In 1897, he was he was named as the main editor of Al-Hakam and then wrote many early biographies on Ahmadiyya. He seems to have lived near the house of MGA, his location is unknown (See Dard, page 563).

In 1900, MGA mentioned Sheikh Yaqub ‘Ali in his book (see Arba’in, online English edition, page 69).

In 1901, Ahmadiyya sources allege that Shaikh Ya‘qub Ali, Qadian gave money for the building of the minaret in Qadian (See Dard, page 856). He was also a worker in and around Qadian (see Dard, page 818).

In 1901 (Jul), Ahmadiyya sources allege that MGA was summoned as a defence witness; so
he left Qadian in a ‘feenis’ (a covered seat fixed on two long poles carried on shoulders by four men) at about 7 a.m. on July 15th, 1901. Maulawi Nur-ud Din, Sh. Ya‘qub Ali and other friends got into ekkas to go to Gurdaspur via Batala; while MGA went direct and reached there at about 3 p.m. As requested by Maulawi Muhammad Ali the party stayed at the house of his father-in-law, Munshi Nabi Bakhsh. Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din came from Peshawar in the evening. It was very hot and MGA was not feeling very well, so he could not sleep the whole night (See Dard, page 702).

In 1905, in the Al-Hakam of July-17-1905 (vol. 9, no. 25, p. 10, 11, Malfuzat-7, English, pages 525-529), the editor (Sheikh Yaqub Ali Irfani) posted a page from an old notebook wherein MGA had written some comments about Buruz. At 45:22, Bro Imtiaz explains how MGA said that the reality of Buruz was opened (like a secret) to MGA. At 49:33, Bro Imtiaz explains how MGA said the concept of Buruz was a secret that was written in the Injil (Gospel).

In 1905-1906, Irfani personally took Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s eldest grandson to Masjid Mubarak and Mirza Aziz Ahmad did MGA’s bait.

In 1908, when MGA died, he was in Qadian.

In 1909 (Dec), he held meetings in Qadian in support of Khilafat (see page 246), he attended the famous meeting on Dec-31-1909 and was forced to renew his bait to Maulvi Nur ud Din.

In 1911 (Aug, via the Al Hakam of 7 and 14 August 1911, Sheikh Yaqub Ali Irfani wrote vs. Khawaja Kamaluddin after the Khawaja had given a lecture at Aligarh on 29 June 1911, titled Muslim yunivarsiti aur us ka Islami pehlu (“The Muslim University and its Islamic Aspect”), Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din Sahib echoed sentiments of unity, but his rhetoric compromised the distinct teachings of the Promised Messiah.

In 1912, Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmad with his companions during their visit of different religious institutions of India, Lucknow, April 1912. Sheikh Yaqub Ali Irfani is seen seated on Huzoor’s right. He also launched the newspaper Ahmadi Khatun in 1912, which lasted for a few years but later was closed.

In 1912, he was for some time [a] translator in the Paisa Akhbar Office. Age 36 years” (See National Archives of India, Home Department, Political, 1912).

In 1914 (Mar), when Nur ud Din died, he stayed in Qadian and supported the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa.

In 1914 (Dec), he was at the 1914 Jalsa at Qadian and even gave a speech.

In 1915, Yacub Ali Irfani wrote 4 historic books in 1915, Sirat-ul-Nabi, Sirat Ahmad, Hyat-e-Ahmad and Sirat Masih Maoud (See Mujadid e Azam by Dr. Basharat Ahmad, the preface). We have found a scan from Hyat-e-Ahmad which indicates that mga was born in 1839 (See in the below). The Khalifa began to officially change this date in 1916 or so.

In 1917, he was working as an assistant secretary of the Sadr Anjuman at Qadian (See ROR of Jan-1918). He also wrote a biography on the wife of MGA, Nusrat Jehan Begum. The year of his death is unknown.

In 1918, he wrote another biographical entry by a toilet attendant of MGA, Mir Hamid Shah.

In 1920, the Aug-Sep-1920 edition of the ROR tells us that the Ahmadiyya Movement has purchased a plot of land wherein housing for missionaries and a small temple could be built. Ahmadiyya sources alleged, that in early 1920, announcements were made to collect funds for a mosque in London. The Ahmadi community in Qadian raised 12,000 rupees. Unlike others, we didn’t plead with the government for funds but came together ourselves. By August 1920, a piece of land and a building were bought for £2,223 (30,000 rupees) in Southfields, London. Today, we’re sharing a rare image of 63 Melrose Road, the mission house before and during the early years of the Fazl Mosque. The building no longer exists, but this photo captures (from right to left): Chaudhry Ali Muhammad, Abdur Raheem Dard, and Yaqub Ali Irfani in front of it.

In 1924, he accompanied the Khalifa on his tour of Europe.

In 1927, he writes a biography on the father in law of MGA, Mir Nasir Nawab, this is wherein MGA blurts out to the effect that he has cholera. After this was published, it was a shocker, Ahmadiya leadership ordered a 2nd edition be published and they erased the relevant sentences. In 1927, Yaqub Ali Irfani, a prominent & devout companion of the Promised Messiah performed the pilgrimage of Hajj. During his stay in Makkah, he also had the opportunity to meet with Sultan Ibn Saud, who was the king of Hijaz. Ahmadiyya sources admit that the King knew that Irfani was a Qadiani-Ahmadi and still allowed him to perform the Hajj.

In 1929, he gave a speech at the 1929 Jalsa at Qadian.

In 1939, Mahmud Ali Irfani, son of Yaqub Ali Irfani, crafted a stunning world map to commemorate two monumental milestones: the Golden Jubilee—50 years of the Ahmadiyya Community—and the Silver Jubilee—25 years of Musleh-e-Maud’s Khilafat.  A Global Legacy: This map, recently rediscovered by the Ahmadiyya Archive & Research Centre, beautifully captures the global presence of the Ahmadiyya Community, marking its remarkable journey of faith and unity across the world.  Explore More: Want to see more treasures like this? Visit the Ahmadiyya Museum at http://ahmadiyyamuseum.artsteps.com for a journey through history!

In 1940, he is mentioned in the ROR of Jan-1940 (via “Truth About the Split”).

In 1942, he is mentioned in the ROR of Oct-1942 by Mirza Aziz Ahmad. Mirza Aziz Ahmad alleges that he went to the school in Qadian which had Sheikh Yakoob Ali Irfanee and Hakeem Muftee Fazlur Rahman as instructors (is this the Talim ul Islam High School?).

In 1943, his son (Mahmud Ahmad Irfani) wrote a book entitled, “Headquarters of the Ahmadiyya Movement” and it was reviewed by the ROR of May-1943. Mahmud Ahmad Irfani is listed as the current editor of the Al-Hakam.

In 1970, the Muslim Sunrise of Oct-Nov-1970 was edited by Maulvi A.R. Khan Bengali. The magazine reports on the World Conference of Religion and Peace that was held in Kyoto, Japan on Oct 16-21, 1970. Major Abdul Hamid and Zafrullah Khan were there and represented Ahmadiyya. The newspaper also reports on the tour of West Africa by the 3rd Khalifa (on April 27th, 1970)(Mirza Nasir Ahmad) and how visited Abidjan, Ivory Coast. A lecture by the 2nd Khalifa on May-29-1922 is reproduced. The same lecture by Mirza Mubarak Ahmad is continued, in this write up, Seth Ghulam Nabi is mentioned, Maulvi Abdul Karim and his book, “Sirat Masih-e-Maud”. Munshi Zafar Ahmad of Kapurthala is also quoted, a book named “Ashab-e-Ahmad” is quoted. Sheikh Yaqub Ali Irfani is also quoted via his book “Shamail Hazrat Masih e Maoud”, he quoted Lalah Sharampat of Qadian and Lala Malawamal, Mirza Bashir Ahmad alleges that Lala Malawama lived to be over 100. The story of Dr. Henry Martyn Clark is also given , as well as the role of Captain Douglas in the case. Muhammad Hussain Batalvi is also quoted. 4 Ahmadiyya locations are given out, the Dayton Mosque-temple at 637 Randolph St, Dayton, Ohio, the Fazl Mosque, 2141 Leroy Place, Washington D.C., the Ahmadiyya Mosque in Chicago, IL, on Wabash Ave and an Ahmadiyya mission in NY, on 147-20 Archer Ave, Jamaica-Queens.

Continue reading “Who is Shaikh Yacub Ali Irfani?” →

Intro
The Ahmadiyya movement has always supported “child-marriage” and polygamy.  In fact, when MGA got married in roughly 1853, he was barely 13 years old and his new wife was younger (his first cousin).  He married again in 1884, Nusrat Jehan Begum was roughly 12 years old if not younger, her younger brother was 2 years old (in 1884) and 3rd youngest sibling hadn’t even been born yet.  MGA had barely been married 18 months by January of 1886 and he decided to leave his wife and spend 40 days in seclusion about 100 miles away from Qadian.  In March of 1886 he had his famous announcement of Feb. 20th, 1886 published.  In this announcement, MGA was predicting a 3rd marriage and a promised son most likely from a 3rd marriage.  MGA seems to have had correspondence with Noorudin (while Noorudin was still in Jammu) about all of these predictions/prophecies.  During the course of that correspondence, MGA seems to have also proposed to Noorudin about Noorudin’s young daughter from a previous marriage (Noorudin was roughly 42 in this era), we have cross-checked both major biographical works on the life of Noorudin (english books only) and we can’t find any data on this.  Shaikh Yacub Ali Irfani also makes an appearance here, he seems to have been working with Noorudin as a student/helper as early as 1886 and in Jammu.  Irfani wrote in a note to the effect that Noorudin would not be allowing his young daughter to marry MGA, since his young daughter was not an adult.  This daughter disappeared from the scene, Noorudin married again in 1889, and his daughter (Amtul Hai) from this marriage married the Khalifa in 1914.  From his first wife, Fatima Sahiba (daughter of Sheikh Mukarram Sahib Bhervi), he had nine sons and five daughters.  We are still unsure which daughter MGA was asking to marry.

The letters with a rough translation into english

MAKTUBAT E AHMADIA VOL-2, PAGE 12
Latter No. 3

My Dear Brother
Your esteemed letter was received,which spreads fragrance of enthusiasm for truth JAZAKALLAH. Prayers were made for your pious daughter. It is a blessing that she has memorized the holy Quran. Otherwise it is a rare thing in the women of this country. How lucky are her parents and the ones who would establish new relationship to you relating to her.

Wassalam 
Ghulam Ahmad
11th March, 1886
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

On 8th June, 1886 MGA sent another letter to Hakim Molvi Nuruddin elaborating his intentions with regard to third marriage and promised son. For the sake of brevity we reproduce only relevant portion as under:-

My Dear Brother,
Four months back, it was revealed to this humble self that i will be blessed with a magnificent son whose name would be Bashir. I was mistaken to think that the promised son would be born of my present wife, but the excessive Ilham have now confirmed that Allah has decided that He will get me re-married to a third wife and bless the promised sone from this third wife. Two different women were motioned for this marriage, but as guided by Allah, both were rejected as one was a misfortunate and other was ugly, since Allah wanted the boy to be born of a woman perfect in piety and beauty.

Some blind critics raised objection as to why the promised son not born of previous pregnancy. What I understand is that the prophesy would materialize after third marriage. This third marriage is to take place shortly. To whom this marriage will take place, excessive Iham are taking place and storm like intensity is found in the intentions of god.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
Qadian, 8th June 1886
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

MGA sent another letter on 20th June to Molvi Nuruddin, the contents of which suggest that Nuruddin did not like the idea of third marriage because there is a note of Irfani, the compiler of Maktubat e Ahmad, which confirms that perhaps Nuruddin disapproved MGA’s proposal for his daughter. Now read the letter and note of Irfani.

My Dear Brother,
Esteemed letter was received, this humble self had written to you of his third marriage just to inform a friend of the heavenly secrets, because it is the habit of this humble self that he informs of some of the Hidden orders (ghaibi amoor)to his friends to increase their faiths.

Since the revelation of ilham of third marriage, this humble self is praying for postponement of this order, but continuance of ilham prove that it has become a definite fate. (Taqdir e Mubram). This humble self has decided to avoid from doing this until a clear and categorical heavenly compulsion is received.

Wassalam- humble self
Ghulam Ahmad
20th June 1886
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Note by Shaikh Yaqub Ali Irfani : 
Allah has given glad-tiding and signs for this third marriage to hazrat sb and he motioned it to his nears and dears who were far away from Allah although not deniers. Hazrat sb informed of these glade tidings to Hakim Nuruddin. As far as he (irfani) knows Hakim sb was ready to give his daughter in Nikah to MGA, in case if she was adult.

Now from such bizarre events, any impartial ahmadi, not only can judge as to what types of weak and fabricated revelations MGA mentions to have received, but also see the quick manoeuvrings he do which surely do not matches with that of a high moral character of a messenger of Allah.

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/28/shaikh-meher-ali-hoshiarpuri-and-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=child+marriage

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/30/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-on-aisha-ra-and-child-marriage/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/04/mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-the-ahmadi-khalifa-claims-that-child-marriage-is-ok-in-the-21st-century-and-aisha-was-12/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/23/mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-had-20-children-with-7-wives/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/29/22-dancing-girls-were-brought-to-qadian-by-the-mirza-family-1848-ish/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/24/amatul-hayee-or-amtul-hai-the-daughter-of-nooruddin-and-the-wife-of-the-2nd-khalifa-mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-and-her-mysterious-death/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/05/19/who-is-shaikh-yacub-ali-irfani/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Intro
MGA was a follower of the Ahl-e-Hadith aka Wahhabi type of Muslims in Northern India.  n fact, his second wedding was with a family of Muslims who were Ahl-e-Hadith. His best friend, Maulvi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi was also Ahl-e-Hadith, the list is endless. MGA had a beef with Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan after he tore up MGA’s Braheen e Ahmadiyya and sent it to Qadian in that condition. We have found a thesis on the life and times of Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan, we have posted the links in the below.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essay’s

https://archive.org/stream/ContributionOfNawabSiddiqHasanKhanToQuranicAndHadithStudies/Contribution%20of%20Nawab%20Siddiq%20Hasan%20Khan%20to%20Qur%27anic%20and%20Hadith%20Studies_djvu.txt

https://www.worldcat.org/title/life-and-works-of-muhammad-siddiq-hasan-khan-nawab-of-bhopal-1248-1307-1832-1890/oclc/1992870

Who is Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi? 1840-1920 – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Intro
Mir Muhammad Ishaq was the son of Mir Nasir Nawab, and younger brother of Nusrat Jehan Begum and Dr. Mir Muhammad Isma’il. His date of birth is Sept 8th, 1890 in Ludhiana. Which is recorded in Nuzul ul Masih (published in 1909). Per Ahmadiyya sources, he had totally moved to Qadian by 1894. He lived with MGA until MGA died in 1908, he even claims to have watched MGA lead prayers for the women of the house many times, whilst standing on MGA’s side, women weren’t allowed in the mosques in Qadian in those days, he lived in this very mansion until he died on March-17-1944 (1:25 time stamp). He even accompanied MGA on his tours of Delhi, Ludhiana, Lahore and Gurdaspur in the era of 1903–1905. At times, he even acted as MGA’s scribe, as he helped to write responses to letters and other various administrative tasks around the house at Qadian.  Ahmadiyya sources tell us that he was never scared to fight non-Ahmadi’s. In 1906, he married Salihi Bi, daughter of Pir Manzoor Muhammad of Ludhiana (brother-in-law of Noorudin).

Soon thereafter (early Jan-1909), Mir Muhammad Ishaq (MGA’s brother-in-law, 18 years old) prepared 7 questions about the relationship between the Sadr Anjuman (of which he was President) and submitted them to the Khalifa (Maulvi Nur ud Din). He lived in the same house as Nur ud Din at the time (1909). Nevertheless, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa didn’t mention the questions in 1921 at all, however, in 1962, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s revealed 3 of the questions (the other 4 are alleged to be similar)(see page 88). The 3 questions were: : (1) Is the Anjuman subservient to the Khalifa (Maulana Nur-ud-Din) or vice versa? (2) Can the Anjuman dismiss the Khalifa or vice versa? (3) How far can the Khalifa interfere in the affairs of the Anjuman? Mir Muhammad Ishaq also told the Khalifa that Maulvi Muhammad Ali and his friends were secretly opposing the Khalifa and it’s office. Lahori-Ahmadi sources allege that Maulvi Nur ud Din sent these questions to be answered by Muhammad Ali and they were. They were sent out. The same questionnaire was also sent to prominent Ahmadi’s in Lahore. Maulvi Nur ud Din called an emergency meeting of the top members.

The ROR of February-1916 reports that he was at the 1915-Jalsa at Qadian and even gave some speeches. They even called him a Professor at the Ahmadiyya Madrassa at Qadian.

In fact, in the 1920–1930’s, he was involved in many fist-fights between Ahmadi’s and Non-Ahmadi’s (see 18:00 of this video). By 1933, he became the headmaster at the Qadiani mullah training center (jamia). He died on March 17, 1944 at age 54(see Tadhkirah, 2009 online edition, page 721 and ROR of April-1944). The ROR alleges that he was Majlis Motamadin Qadian, Nazir-i-Ziafat and Head-master -Madrassa-i-Ahmadiyya.

He seems to have also written a commentary on the Quran, the second edition (online edition) is from 2006. The first edition was published from Rabwah, which makes it 1950’s–1970’s, interestingly, in terms of 5:75, he translated the controversial words as “many” and not “All”. He also contradicted the Khalifa on 2:4.
Continue reading “Who is Mir Muhammad Ishaq (1890–1944)? The brother-in-law of MGA” →