ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Ahmadis are heavily involved in politics, since at least 1889.  They normally send out memo’s to their Mullahs, since in Ahmadiyya, management of Mullahs is centralized from London.  They recently sent out a memo in terms of the Panama Leaks and the mention of Ahmadis therein, the official line has been to admit that Ahmadiyya leadership stored money in Panama, however, to argue that it was necessary since the Pakistani govt. is corrupt and may seize the assets of the Mirza family at any time.  However, as we all know, this is a half-truth, the money that Ahmadiyya collects, since at least 1984-85, has been stored in banks in the UK, not Pakistan.

Trump’s Muslim ban and Ahmadiyya
The Muslim ban didn’t cover Pakistan, and since Ahmadis have held refugee status with the United Nations since at least 1984, it doesn’t effect Ahmadis at all.  Further, since Ahmadis are not even considered Muslim in the countries that were banned, the ban totally doesn’t even effect them.  Nonetheless, Ahmadiyya leadership loves any and all press.  Moreover, while Ahmadis keep pussyfooting around, a legit organization in the USA, CAIR, has began the legal process vs. Trump.  We all know Ahmadis will never sue any government as such.

The Scan

The talking points

Intro
In the below, we have posted the Friday Sermon of Mirza Nasir Ahmad after the Rabwah train attacks of May-29-1974.
Continue reading “Mirza Nasir Ahmad’s Friday sermon after the train attacks” →

Intro
Chitan – a firebrand Urdu journal run by veteran Ahrari leader Agha Shorish Kashmiri – printed this story. The religio-political parties and anti-Ahmadi groups projected this incident as an instance of growing Ahmadi power in the country. These diverse groups banded together to form Majlis-i-Amal (Council for Action), with Maulana Yousaf Banori as its president.  (see Usman, page 176).

Also see    Chitan (Lahore) 27, 22 (3 June 1974): 5.
Continue reading “100 Students of Nishtar Medical College Attacked by Qadiyani Dogs in Rabwah” →

Intro
The Samdani commission report was never read out to anyone. It was presented during the NA, however, it was never opened or discussed, most likely because of a lack of time. The Samdani commission report has remained secret, even after the 1974 NA hearings were made public.

Justice Samdani commented much later in 
“What I concluded was that, look, there are good and bad people in every society. There are rogues among the Ahmadis as well. So, because on their way the students of Nishtar Medical College had made insults, this was organized to avenge that insult. So a few rogues took revenge. It did not involve Jamaʻat Ahmadiyyah or the leader of Jamaʻat Ahmadiyyah. This was made clear [in the report].”41 “””

(See  “Ahmad, Silsila Ahmadiyyah”, vol. 3, 468.) And “The Ahmadis and the Politics of Religious Exclusion in Pakistan”, by Ali Usman Qasmi (2015), page 176-177.)  Free download here too.  The Ahmadis and the Politics of Religious Exclusion in Pakistan

By August 27th, 1974, the Samdani Commission had absolved the Pakistani Government of any involvment in the Rabwah train attacks on May-25-1974. Interview had begun on June-6th-1974 (See in the below).

Continue reading “Justice Samdani confessed that Ahmadis planned the Rabwah attacks!!” →

Intro
MGA was taking Chlorodyne just a few hours before his death. Chlorodyne was the main medicine in the world to cure #cholera. MGA and his doctors knew that he had cholera.
A few hours later, Dr. Mirza Yacub Beg reports that MGA was forced to sit on a chokee (shitter). MGA was given an injection directly into his heart as he about to die. MGA most likely died at 3-4am on May 26th, 1908, on Brandereth Road in Lahore. Molvi Abdur Rehman was there with MGA on brandereth road when MGA died.

In this scenario, MGA must have been suffering from the effects of Cholera even a few days before he died. In fact, the entire reason why he was in Lahore is dubious. It seems that he was there for medical treatment, and was taking many medicines which contained high amounts of opium. He could not have written any books in this condition, nor were any of his salaat accepted.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was taking Chlorodyne (a cure for cholera) just before his death” →

Intro
I had an Ahmadi tell me that Mullahs from Pakistan are always conducting hate-speech vs. Ahmadis and its wrong and etc etc etc.  However, this Ahmadi seems to have never noticed that in every Ahmadi marketing opportunity, Ahmadis are anti-Islam.  In fact, this is the reason why Ordinance XX was passed, to stop Ahmadis from hate-speech vs. the Muslims of Pakistan.

Nonetheless, in this video, Mirza Tahir Ahmad fabricated a dream of his wherein he is hitting a dog with a shoe, he later says that this dog was Tahir Al-Qadri.  This is the height of hate-speech.

The video

Intro
The Sunni-version of Islam is as follows, Hadith+Sunnah+the Quran=Islam. It is common sense that the Quran without the hadith/sunnah is incomplete. The Quranists had faded away into the annals of Islamic thought by 1800. However, Sir Syed revived this theory of Islam in the 1870’s. Some of his admirers were Noorudin, Abdul Kareem, MGA and Mufti Sadiq. Sir Syed had even wrote that Esa (as) was never returning (1882) and he denied all concepts of the Mahdi.

In 1895, (See Arya Dharam, RK-10, pp. 86-87), MGA alleged that Sahih of Bukhari ranks as the first after the Quran in terms of authenticity. All its Ahadith which are not opposed to the Holy Qur’an are in MGA’s view authoritative. Next comes Sahih Muslim. MGA accepted its authority subject to the condition that it should not be opposed to the Holy Qur’an and Sahih Bukhari. Next to them are the compilations of Tirmidhi, Ibn-e-Majah, Muattah of Imam Malik, Nassa’i, Abu Da’ud and Dar Qutni, which we regard as authoritative so long as they are not opposed to the Holy Qur’an and Bukhari and Muslim. These are our religious books and these are the conditions under which we accept them..

In 1900, MGA says that he only can judge which hadith are right or wrong (See Malfuzat-2, page 25, Urdu edition, Online English Edition of Malfuzat-3, pages 28-31 and via Bro Imtiaz herein).

In 1900, (while beefing with Pir Mehr Ali Shah), MGA began claiming that only he knew the authenticity of any given hadith. MGA also claimed that he believed in his own wahi that same way that he believes in the Torah, the Gospel and the Holy Quran (See “Arba’in, online English edition, page 159). Thus, MGA was declaring repeatedly that his God had sent him as the Promised Messiah and has informed him which particular hadith is authentic and which hadith is not, and He has bestowed on him the correct understanding of the Holy Quran, then why should he engage with these people? Check out Bro Imtiaz’s video on this too.

In the 1900-1902 era, MGA alleged that God Almighty has informed me that all these ahadith which are cited [by my opponents] suffer from perversion of meaning or text or have been entirely fabricated. And he who has been commissioned as the Arbiter has the authority to select, on the basis of knowledge bestowed by the Divine, out of the corpus of ahadith those that he deems authentic and reject the others, based on the knowledge bestowed by the Divine [Appendix Tohfah Golarhviyyah, p. 10 footnote, Ruhani Khaza’in vol. 17 p. 51 footnote](See Also, the 2009 online english edition of Tadhkirah).

In 1903, via Mawahibur-Rahman (page 117), MGA and his team of writers argued that if an Ayah (verse of the Quran) has dual implication, the meaning presented by MGA is worthier of acceptance. Anything opposed to this is transgression/falsehood and imposture. MGA also said something similar about hadith, since he was Hakam and Adl, only MGA could choose which hadith were authentic or not.

In 1909, (Nuzulul-Masih, RK, v18, page 424 and via Bro Imtiaz, MGA says he is not Hanafi, not Shafi, not Maliki, not Hanbali, not Ja’fari (shia), not Muqallid and not Ahl-e-Hadith. MGA says that why should he listen to these people and their grading of hadith?

In 1924 (Jul-4)(See Khutbatay Mahmoud, V-8, (page 457), and via Bro Imtiaz herein), in a Friday sermon, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa, Mirza Basheer uddin Mahmud Ahmad alleged that Now there is NO Quran, other than that which was presented by MGA, there is NO hadith, other than that which you see and understand in the light from MGA (Maseeh-e-Maud). Now there is NO prophet, except one who can be seen via the light of Maseeh-e-Maud (MGA), and a buruz of Muhammad (saw), they must go through MGA. If anyone thinks that they can get the light without MGA, they will see nothing. Maseeh maoud (Mirza qadyani) used to say that ahadees is a work of a juggler, and juggler brings out from the box whatever he wants.

Continue reading “In Ahmadiyya, Islam= the revelations of MGA+the Quran” →

Intro
After roughly 1957, the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad never came out in public ever again. He made his eldest son in-charge (Mirza Nasir Ahmad) and he went totally crazy behind the scenes. He died on November 7, 1965, however, just 2 months before his death, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s published “Truth Triumphs” on September 1st, 1965, wherein they attacked the illnesses of the Khalifa.

As Muslims, we don’t celebrate the death of anyone as such. However, in the case of Ahmadiyya, we are forced to point out how agonizing of a death some prominent Ahmadi’s faced, since Ahmadi’s made it a point to do the same with us and our scholars/elders.
Continue reading “The slow agonizing death of Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad (1965)” →