In this research study, beck points out how Muslims have different attitudes between Lahori-Ahmadi’s and Qadiani-Ahmadi’s. The Muslims of Indonesia have a tolerant attitude towards the Lahori-Ahmadi’s, as do most Muslims around the world, however, with the Qadiani’s, everyone is hostile. Beck tells us how on Friday, 1 February 1929, of the 18th Congress of the Muhammadiyah. On this day the Muhammadiyah’s Majlis Tarjih issued a pronouncement condemning the Ahmadiyya, which meant a definitive rupture between the two organizations (Programma Moehammadijah 1929:23).
Back in February 22nd, 1985, Mirza Tahir Ahmad did a Q&A session in London wherein he answered a controversial topic. What is really ironic is that Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s (MTA) father was married 7 times. MTA’s father always kept 4 wives after 1928 or so. Mirza Tahir Ahmad and his sisters were raised by his aunties and extended family, and must have suffered through cases of favoritism.
“””To return to polygamy, it is evident from a study of the Holy Quran that a special situation of a post-war period is being discussed. It is a time when a society is left with a large number of orphans and young widows, and the balance of male and female population is severely disturbed. A similar situation prevailed in Germany after the Second World War. Islam not being the predominant religion of Germany, Germany was left with no solution for the problem. The strictly monogamous teaching of Christianity could offer no relief. As such, the people of Germany had to suffer the consequence of these imbalances. There were a large number of virgins, dejected spinsters and young widows for whom it was impossible to get married. Germany was not the only country in the vast continent of Europe to experience such social problems of extremely dangerous and gigantic proportions. It was too great a challenge for the post-war Western society to stem the tide and check the growth of moral degradation and promiscuity, which so naturally and exuberantly thrived on the prevailing imbalances.
As can be plainly seen by every unbiased person, the only answer to all such problematic disturbances is to permit men to marry more than once. This is not proposed as a solution to satiate their sensual desires but to meet the genuine requirements of a large number of women. If this very logical and realistic solution is rejected, the only alternative left for society is to rapidly degenerate into a growingly corrupt and permissive society.
Alas! That seems to have been the option taken by the West. When you re-examine more realistically and unemotionally the two attitudes, you cannot fail to notice that it is not a question of equality between men and women but it is simply a choice between responsibility and irresponsibility.
Islam only permits marriage more than once with the proviso that men accept the challenge of such difficult and specific situations with””””
In 1988, the Ahmadiyya Movement, per the order of Mirza Tahir Ahmad, published the official 5-volume complete commentary on the Quran. However, in the publishers note, it is written that this 5 volume commentary is a translation of Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad’s Urdu language (incomplete) Tafsirs of the Quran. However, if you check those Urdu-only Tafsir’s, you will notice that the Khalifa seems to have skipped Chapters 3–9 and 30–77 of the Quran, which are the most controversial in terms of Ahmadiyya. You don’t have to check the urdu-only Tafsir’s to understand this point, it is written as such in the publishers note of the english 5-volume commentary. In fact, he seems to have skipped half of the Quran! It is important to note that Malik Ghulam Farid was dead by 1988 when this 5-volume commentary was published. The question remains, where did Malik Ghulam Farid get his data for the remaining chapters?
“Prophethood has admittedly been terminated with the advent of our Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. There is now neither any book besides the Quran, the best of the Scriptures nor any Shari’ah other than Shari’ah of Muhammad. The Holy Prophet, who is the best of all creation, has given me the name ‘prophet’ which is a reflection of countless blessings earned by obeying him faithfully. I see no virtue of my own. I owe accomplishments to this holy soul. My prophethood in the divine lingo means only abundance of communion and communication. Let the curse of Allah be upon him who aspires anything beyond this and arrogates or pulls his neck away from the yoke of obedience to this Holy Prophet. Our Messenger (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), is undoubtedly the Khatam al-Anbiya and with him has terminated the chain of the messengers; so no one can now claim perfect prophethood after our Messenger, the Chosen one. Nothing is now left after him except abundance of communion and communication and even that cannot be received without obedience to the Holy Prophet, who is the best of mankind. I declare it on solemn affirmation that I have attained this status only by following the beams of light radiated from his prophethood, and that I have been called a prophet by God only metaphorically and not by way of reality.” ___________________________________________________________________________This supplement was in Arabic only
I would have to guess that Ahsan Amrohi wrote this supplement, since Maulvi Abdul Kareem was already dead, Nooruddin probably helped.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The new translation–2018
….prophethood came to an end after our Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and there is no Book after al-Furqan [the Discrimination; i.e. the Holy Quran] which is superior to all earlier Scriptures, neither is there any new shariah after the Muhammadan Shariah.
However, the Best of Mankind declared me to be a Prophet, and this is a matter of being his reflection due to the blessings of complete submission. And I find no excellence within me; all that I have obtained is through his holy soul. By calling me a Prophet, Allah means only [that I receive] abundant revelations and converse [with God]. May the curse of Allah be upon the one who aspires to anything beyond that, or considers his own person as something special, or frees his neck from the yoke [i.e. complete submission] of the prophethood [of the Holy Prophet sa].
Surely, our Messenger is Khatamun-Nabiyyin [the Seal of the Prophets] and the chain of Messengers has ended with him. Therefore, no one has the right to claim prophethood after our Messenger, the Chosen One, in an independent manner, and nothing has remained after him except dialogue [with Allah] in abundance. Even this is conditional upon following [the Holy Prophet sa] and is not granted unless one is a true follower of the Best of Creation. I swear by God that I have been blessed with this spiritual station only by following the radiant rays of the light of the Chosen Prophet sa. I have been granted the name ‘Prophet’ by Allah, not in its original sense [of being raised independently], but as a subordinate Prophet.
________________________________________________________________________________________________The Qadiani-Ahmadi’s lied, not Muhammad Ali
Mirza Masroor Ahmad ordered this cover-up. If you notice, they took out the word metaphor (in arabic as MAJAZ)and totally replaced it with “original sense” and they removed, “not by way of reality” and wrote: “but as a subordinate Prophet”.
________________________________________________________________________________________________The Urdu version of Haqiqatul Wahy’s supplement, the urdu translation
I may add here that on the Qadiani Jamaat website there is an Urdu translation of this Arabic section of Haqiqat-ul-Wahy (see link), and in this translation the above statement has been quite correctly rendered as:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________Links and related Essays
The story There was a newspaper named Mubahila. Editor of that newspaper, Abdul Kareem, use to expose mirza about his lies and ghastly character from books of mirza Qadiyani. On 23rd April 1930 , one follower of mirza qadiyani attacked Abdul Kareem, inflicted serious injuries upon him and killed his one companion Haji Muhammad Hussain for the honor of mirza. Qazi Muhammad Ali was arrested and sent to jail where proceedings of his case started on 1st November 1930. After proceedings Capital Punishment was awarded to Qazi Muhammad Ali under two charges, Murder and attempted Murder. Appeal was filed in higher courts but rejected, consequently Qazi Muhammad Ali was hanged on 21 May 1931. Today every Qadiyani says that killing for the honor of Holy Prophet Peace Be Upon Him is not justified at all and it is and atrocious act. What they did in case of Qazi Muhammad Ali???
When he Killed Haji Muhammad Hussain, Second khaleefa Of Jamaat supported him in his Friday sermons. He declared that Qazi Muhammad Ali did this out extreme level of faith. He fought his case starting from lower level to high courts and praised him a lot. When he was hanged, second khaleefa send special individual to bring his dead body to Qadiyan. He offered his JANAZA and shoulder the funeral. In official newspaper of Mirzaies they published an article with Heading “Splendid end of respected Qazi Muhammad Ali” in which he was posed as hero. Many people demanded his pictures to blees their eyes with sight of Qazi Muhammad Ali, Those were printed and sold to them. And he is still hero of Jamat for killing an innocent.
We always observe and say that Qadiyanies have no relation with Holy Prophet Peace Be Upon Him. They Always degrade Ghazi Ilm Ud Deen who killed Raj Pal for honor of Holy Prophet Peace Be Upon Him, but consider Qazi Muhammad Ali as Hero who killed for mirza.
Ahmadiyya leaders have been caught red-handed purposely mis-translating verses of the Quran out of embarrassment. In the specific case of 78:33, or 78:34 in the Ahmadiyya Quran’s. We have found a serious mis-translation which proves the entire deception program of the Mirza family. We still haven’t found MGA’s comments on these verses. However, we did find an ROR article from 1906, wherein it seems that Muhammad Ali wrote contrary to his own famous quranic commentary of 1917. This essay will chronologically prove how Ahmadiyya has purposely lied in this matter and many others. Furthermore, all dictionaries/lexicons (Like Lane’s lexicon) on the Arabic language have always translated “Kawa`ib Atrab” as maidens with FULLY grown breasts as well as beautiful eyes and all very young and non-aging.
My comments on this topic
There is no doubt that allah promised beautiful women to Muslim men once arriving in heaven. However, these could be robots or some other invention. Moreover, the treasures in store for women are not discussed by allah at all, it may be about of respect, nevertheless, I would assume that women would get the same reward. All of the Abrahamic faiths promised a bevy of pleasures in heaven, and mostly sexual. In the after life, we will be living like Kings and Gods. This is plausible, since heaven is a parallel universe and this life is simply a test.
Tafsir Ibn Kathir on 78:33
Ibn Kathir writes:
Kawa`ib Atrab,) meaning, wide-eyed maidens with fully developed breasts. Ibn `Abbas, Mujahid and others have said,
(Kawa`ib) “This means round breasts. They meant by this that the breasts of these girls will be fully rounded and not sagging, because they will be virgins, equal in age. This means that they will only have one age.”
“And those showing freshness of youth 2649, equals in age”
Muhammad Ali gives commentary
Note–2649. The word Ka’aba literally signifies, when applied to a girl’s breast, its swelling when she grows youthful, and a girl is said to be Ka’ib (plural Kawa’ib) when she grows youthful, or nears maturity, and her breasts begin to swell (LL). But it should be noted that neither the word kawa’ib nor atrab is preceded or followed by the word jariyah (i.e. girl), and hence as a qualifying word kawab’ib only means showing freshness of youth. I have already stated in note 2356, why some of the blessings of paradise are described in words usually applicable to women, but as these are only fruits of the righteous deeds, we are not justified in saying what these blessings actually are. The description given here probably indicates that the fruits of deeds will appear in their full freshness.
The Ahmadiyya official 5-volume commentary It is unknown what the 2nd Khalifa wrote thus far. His commentary may not have even covered this chapter. Nevertheless, the official 5-volume commentary was written by an employee of the Mirza family, Malik Ghulam Farid and he claims to have based it on the commentary by the 2nd Khalifa.