In this research study, beck points out how Muslims have different attitudes between Lahori-Ahmadi’s and Qadiani-Ahmadi’s. The Muslims of Indonesia have a tolerant attitude towards the Lahori-Ahmadi’s, as do most Muslims around the world, however, with the Qadiani’s, everyone is hostile. Beck tells us how on Friday, 1 February 1929, of the 18th Congress of the Muhammadiyah. On this day the Muhammadiyah’s Majlis Tarjih issued a pronouncement condemning the Ahmadiyya, which meant a definitive rupture between the two organizations (Programma Moehammadijah 1929:23).
Back in February 22nd, 1985, Mirza Tahir Ahmad did a Q&A session in London wherein he answered a controversial topic. What is really ironic is that Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s (MTA) father was married 7 times. MTA’s father always kept 4 wives after 1928 or so. Mirza Tahir Ahmad and his sisters were raised by his aunties and extended family, and must have suffered through cases of favoritism.
“””To return to polygamy, it is evident from a study of the Holy Quran that a special situation of a post-war period is being discussed. It is a time when a society is left with a large number of orphans and young widows, and the balance of male and female population is severely disturbed. A similar situation prevailed in Germany after the Second World War. Islam not being the predominant religion of Germany, Germany was left with no solution for the problem. The strictly monogamous teaching of Christianity could offer no relief. As such, the people of Germany had to suffer the consequence of these imbalances. There were a large number of virgins, dejected spinsters and young widows for whom it was impossible to get married. Germany was not the only country in the vast continent of Europe to experience such social problems of extremely dangerous and gigantic proportions. It was too great a challenge for the post-war Western society to stem the tide and check the growth of moral degradation and promiscuity, which so naturally and exuberantly thrived on the prevailing imbalances.
As can be plainly seen by every unbiased person, the only answer to all such problematic disturbances is to permit men to marry more than once. This is not proposed as a solution to satiate their sensual desires but to meet the genuine requirements of a large number of women. If this very logical and realistic solution is rejected, the only alternative left for society is to rapidly degenerate into a growingly corrupt and permissive society.
Alas! That seems to have been the option taken by the West. When you re-examine more realistically and unemotionally the two attitudes, you cannot fail to notice that it is not a question of equality between men and women but it is simply a choice between responsibility and irresponsibility.
Islam only permits marriage more than once with the proviso that men accept the challenge of such difficult and specific situations with””””
In 1988, the Ahmadiyya Movement, per the order of Mirza Tahir Ahmad, published the official 5-volume complete commentary on the Quran. However, in the publishers note, it is written that this 5 volume commentary is a translation of Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad’s Urdu language (incomplete) Tafsirs of the Quran. However, if you check those Urdu-only Tafsir’s, you will notice that the Khalifa seems to have skipped Chapters 3–9 and 30–77 of the Quran, which are the most controversial in terms of Ahmadiyya. You don’t have to check the urdu-only Tafsir’s to understand this point, it is written as such in the publishers note of the english 5-volume commentary. In fact, he seems to have skipped half of the Quran! It is important to note that Malik Ghulam Farid was dead by 1988 when this 5-volume commentary was published. The question remains, where did Malik Ghulam Farid get his data for the remaining chapters?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________A 3-man committee started this work in 1947
The story There was a newspaper named Mubahila. Editor of that newspaper, Abdul Kareem, use to expose mirza about his lies and ghastly character from books of mirza Qadiyani. On 23rd April 1930 , one follower of mirza qadiyani attacked Abdul Kareem, inflicted serious injuries upon him and killed his one companion Haji Muhammad Hussain for the honor of mirza. Qazi Muhammad Ali was arrested and sent to jail where proceedings of his case started on 1st November 1930. After proceedings Capital Punishment was awarded to Qazi Muhammad Ali under two charges, Murder and attempted Murder. Appeal was filed in higher courts but rejected, consequently Qazi Muhammad Ali was hanged on 21 May 1931. Today every Qadiyani says that killing for the honor of Holy Prophet Peace Be Upon Him is not justified at all and it is and atrocious act. What they did in case of Qazi Muhammad Ali???
When he Killed Haji Muhammad Hussain, Second khaleefa Of Jamaat supported him in his Friday sermons. He declared that Qazi Muhammad Ali did this out extreme level of faith. He fought his case starting from lower level to high courts and praised him a lot. When he was hanged, second khaleefa send special individual to bring his dead body to Qadiyan. He offered his JANAZA and shoulder the funeral. In official newspaper of Mirzaies they published an article with Heading “Splendid end of respected Qazi Muhammad Ali” in which he was posed as hero. Many people demanded his pictures to blees their eyes with sight of Qazi Muhammad Ali, Those were printed and sold to them. And he is still hero of Jamat for killing an innocent.
We always observe and say that Qadiyanies have no relation with Holy Prophet Peace Be Upon Him. They Always degrade Ghazi Ilm Ud Deen who killed Raj Pal for honor of Holy Prophet Peace Be Upon Him, but consider Qazi Muhammad Ali as Hero who killed for mirza.
Ahmadiyya leaders have been caught red-handed purposely mis-translating verses of the Quran out of embarrassment. In the specific case of 78:33, or 78:34 in the Ahmadiyya Quran’s. We have found a serious mis-translation which proves the entire deception program of the Mirza family. We still haven’t found MGA’s comments on these verses. However, we did find an ROR article from 1906, wherein it seems that Muhammad Ali wrote contrary to his own famous quranic commentary of 1917. This essay will chronologically prove how Ahmadiyya has purposely lied in this matter and many others. Furthermore, all dictionaries/lexicons (Like Lane’s lexicon) on the Arabic language have always translated “Kawa`ib Atrab” as maidens with FULLY grown breasts as well as beautiful eyes and all very young and non-aging. Continue reading “The Ahmadiyya violation on 78:33, the description of women in the Islamic heaven”→