ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
In Part-1 of the #Londondebate (#Qadianismontrial), Qadiani-Ahmadi’s have fully turned into “Lahori-Ahmadi’s” and denying MGA’s claim of being the literal 2nd coming of Muhammad (Saw) via Buruz and “The LAST PROPHET“. Instead, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s are claiming that MGA was only speaking in a “metaphoric-spiritual” manner, however, that is the Lahori-Ahmadi position (See the writings of Maulvi Muhammad Ali). Ahmadi’s refused cross examination in this debate, which means they lost before it even started (see the clip on Twitter). The Ahmadi Maulvi team refused to give fatwa’s, however, they kept asking us for fatwa’s, the Quran is against this! This is hypocrisy (See 61:2 of the Quran). Lastly, in this debate, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s have taken the position of the “Lahori-Ahmadi’s” and are claiming that MGA was only a prophet in a metaphoric sense, the claim of “Muhammad and Ahmad”, the 2nd coming of Muhammad (Saw) and the “Khatam ul Anbiya” (See Maulvi Muhammad Ali, “Prophethood in Islam”, 1915, pages 422, 435 and 15, 21 and 25).

As part of his opening statement, Bro Imtiaz mentioned how Ahmadi’s believe that looking at the face of MGA is like looking at the face of Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah)(See Al-Badr, Oct-25, 1906 and the Al-Fazl of Aug-13-1944, See also the 1974 NA proceedings page 785, pdf page 410). If you want to see Muhammad (Saw), look at MGA at Qadian (naozobillah). This was also stated by the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad.

Bro Imtiaz also mentioned how MGA argued that he would die in the grave of Muhammad (Saw). In 1909, MGA alleged that God Almighty has entered me in Muhammad’s (saw) being, in everything, without even letting it (from me) to have a different name or a different grave (See RK-18, page 381, Nuzul Maseeh)(See pages 297-298, online English Edition). MGA also argued that from the hadith, it is clearly derived that in the end times, Prophet Muhammad (saw) will also appear in the world (See RK-18, page 384)(See page 300, online English Edition).

Bro Imtiaz explained how in 1902, MGA said that the truth is that the spiritual power of the holy Prophet (SAW) at the end of the 6th thousand (13th century in Mirza Ghulam), i.e. these days, is MUCH STRONGER, MORE COMPLETE and STRONGER than in THOSE EARLY YEARS. Nay, it is like the fourteenth (moonlit) night (full moon)(Khutbah Ilhamiya RK 16:271)(See also Kalimatul Fasl, pg. 147). MGA also said, Islam was a crescent at the time of Muhammad (Saw), but now it is like a full moon (Khutbah Ilhamiya RK 16:275). In 1902, MGA said that the person who makes a difference between MGA and Muhammad (Saw) has neither seen me nor recognized MGA (See Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, RK, V16, P. 258 – 259). MGA also claimed to be the FINAL BRICK of the prophets (See RK-16, Pg 178, Khutba-e-Ilhamiah). MGA claimed that in the palace of prophets, one brick was left (See Rk-16, Pg 177, Khutba-e-Ilhamiah and via Bro Imtiaz). MGA also claimed that the time of the manifest victory of the era of the holy Prophet has expired, and the second victory which was to be much greater and clearer then the first one had yet to be achieved. It was ordained that its time should fall during the times of the promised Masih (See Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, pages 193-194, and via RK16, p.288).

Ibrahim Ikhlaf in a nutshell: “Your 2 mins = Our 8 mins… or debate over.” “Moderator issue? End the debate right now.” “Livestream issue? Comply or leave.” “Cross-examination? Absolutely not- debate is over.

Continue reading “Part-1 of the debate, FULL REVIEW, is MGA greater than Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah) #Qadianismontrial” →

Intro
In 2026 (May), @UmarElhashmi watched the “great debate” (#qadianismontrial) and observed/adjudged that Ibrahim Ikhlaf has NO knowledge of the Arabic language (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Ibrahim Ikhlaf seems to have mixed up the words Istigraaqiyya, istishraq and ishtishraqiyya, this is something that an average person can never do, so how is he a scholar? @UmarElhashmi also pointed out that Ibrahim Ikhlaf was reading off of his laptop screen.

@UmarElhashmi watched the recent debate with the Qadiani’s and has given his comments herein. Umar El Hashmi pointed out mistakes in reading the Quran by Ibrahim Ikhlaf, he mis-pronounced 49:14 of the Quran, specifically, the verse says, “Yud Khu Lil”, however, Ikhlaf mispronounces it as “Yud Khee Lul” (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter and on the Twitter account of @UmarElhashmi). @UmarElhashmi also pointed out how Maulvi Raheel called the famous Musaylima and “Musaylima bin Khattab”, which is totally incorrect.

@UmarElhashmi also pointed out how Maulvi Raheel said “ba ta loo” instead of “ba ta la” (See the clip on Twitter). Maulvi Raheel wasn’t reading from the Quran or hadith, however, he seems to be reading a Legal Maxim in Fiqh. In summary: Every verb in Arabic, on a beginner level, has 3 root letters and must follow the verb form: 1. Fa ‘a la 2. Fa ‘u la 3. Fa ‘i la There is no such thing as: Fa ‘a loo So apply now the letters: baa taa and laam to the scale and you get: Ba ta la You can NEVER get: Ba Ta Loo And that is so long as it’s a verb, which is the case in that principle he tried to sound smart when quoting: إذا جاء الاحتمال، بَطَلَ الاستدلال Izaa jaa-al-ihtimaal, ba ta la-l-istidlaal. It can NEVER be ‘ba ta loo’ Ever. So when he says ba ta loo… it’s a huge facepalm moment, just like their “al-qawl al-sahaabi” which I called out in my YouTube video under the video sections “exposing their ignorance of Arabic” — as well as their saying “alif-laam istishraaqiyyah” and only realizing that’s wrong by reading it on screen— exposed that and called it out.

Continue reading “@UmarElhashmi explains how Ibrahim Ikhlaf has NO knowledge of the Arabic language” →

Intro
@knowledge_is_power14 is a disabled Qadiani-Ahmadi living in the UK and acting tough on TikTok. Qadiani-Ahmadi have been ordered by Mirza Masroor Ahmad to flood TikTok with their silly tabligh. These nerds were similarly on Paltalk about 20+ years ago, Khurram too. They read off of a script and have never conducted research on their own. At one point, @knowledge_is_power14 was saying his name was Subha Sadique.

In 2026 (Feb), I got his whatsapp number and sent him some messages and he immediately made personal attacks on me and my father. I told him that Ahmadi’s like Khurram are scared I will physically hurt them. He responded by asking me for a fight. Check out the screenshots.

In 2026 (Apr), he showed up (with a walking cane) and asked Bro Imtiaz a question at a Sunni masjid in the UK. @knowledge_is_power14 asked about the famous book, “Tahdhir al-Nas” and asked if this book proved that an “Ummati-Nabi” could come. In response to this, Bro Imtiaz asked @knowledge_is_power14 to come to the front and read out the quote and explain it, however, this was refused (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter and TikTok). Bro Imtiaz said that if he is incapable of doing that, he should apologize.

Continue reading “Who is @knowledge_is_power14?” →

Intro
In 2026 (Apr), Maulvi Razi claims that Muhammad (Saw) disobeyed Allah when he prayed for Abdallah Ibn Ubayy (a munafiq)(naozobillah)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). However, this is not the case. In Quran 9:80-9:84, Allah offers him a choice and the prophet avails it. The prophet (saw) prays the hypocrite’s janaza, and AFTER that the prohibition verse was revealed. After the revelation (9:84) he never prayed for a hypocrite again (See Tafsir ibn Kathir, page 490). They lie upon rasoolAllah (saw) to dig Mirza out of the hole. Muhammad (saw) never disobeyed Allah. See the Qadiani-Ahmadi commentary on 9:84.

Continue reading “Maulvi Razi accuses Muhammad (saw) of praying for the munafiqeen, then Allah told Muhammad (saw) that this was a mistake (naozobillah)” →

Intro
Sheikh Asrar Rashid has commented on the recent debate (#qadianismontrial)(39:55 time stamp). Sheikh Asrar Ahmad explained how met Bro Imtiaz in the UK and how the Qadiani’s kept throwing red herrings in this debate.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

https://www.youtube.com/live/XDlVydyRWOg?si=JGZCApq364HZeTXa

(3) Asrar Rashid – Official – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/c/AsrarRashidOfficial

Asrar Rashid Official (@ShAsrarRashid) / X

https://x.com/ShAsrarRashid

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #qadianismontrial

Intro
In the recent debate (#qadianismontrial)(1:56:20 and 1:56:50), as part of his opening statement and in an attempt to reject all the references wherein MGA was called the Final prophet, last Adam, last Mahdi, final messiah, takfir was done vs. Muslims, Maulvi Razi denied the Al-Fazl newspaper (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). However, it should be noted that Mirza Nasir Ahmad did the same in 1974 at the National Assembly, MGA also denied that Al-Hakam was an official newspaper in 1899. In 1954, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa also denied the Al-Fazl. Thus, this is normal Qadiani behavior.

Continue reading “While #qadianismontrial, Maulvi Razi denied Al-Fazl, claimed that it goes against the writings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad” →

Intro
@UmarElhashmi watched the recent debate with the Qadiani’s and has given his comments herein. Umar El Hashmi pointed out mistakes in reading the Quran by Ibrahim Ikhlaf, he mis-pronounced 49:14 of the Quran, specifically, the verse says, “Yud Khu Lil”, however, Ikhlaf mispronounces it as “Yud Khee Lul” (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter and on the Twitter account of @UmarElhashmi). @UmarElhashmi also pointed out how Maulvi Raheel called the famous Musaylima and “Musaylima bin Khattab”, which is totally incorrect.

@UmarElhashmi also pointed out how Maulvi Raheel said “ba ta loo” instead of “ba ta la” (See the clip on Twitter). Maulvi Raheel wasn’t reading from the Quran or hadith, however, he seems to be reading a Legal Maxim in Fiqh. In summary: Every verb in Arabic, on a beginner level, has 3 root letters and must follow the verb form: 1. Fa ‘a la 2. Fa ‘u la 3. Fa ‘i la There is no such thing as: Fa ‘a loo So apply now the letters: baa taa and laam to the scale and you get: Ba ta la You can NEVER get: Ba Ta Loo And that is so long as it’s a verb, which is the case in that principle he tried to sound smart when quoting: إذا جاء الاحتمال، بَطَلَ الاستدلال Izaa jaa-al-ihtimaal, ba ta la-l-istidlaal. It can NEVER be ‘ba ta loo’ Ever. So when he says ba ta loo… it’s a huge facepalm moment, just like their “al-qawl al-sahaabi” which I called out in my YouTube video under the video sections “exposing their ignorance of Arabic” — as well as their saying “alif-laam istishraaqiyyah” and only realizing that’s wrong by reading it on screen— exposed that and called it out.

In 2026 (May), @UmarElhashmi watched the “great debate” (#qadianismontrial) and observed/adjudged that Ibrahim Ikhlaf has NO knowledge of the Arabic language (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Ibrahim Ikhlaf seems to have mixed up the words Istigraaqiyya, istishraq and ishtishraqiyya, this is something that an average person can never do, so how is he a scholar? @UmarElhashmi also pointed out that Ibrahim Ikhlaf was reading off of his laptop screen.

Continue reading “@UmarElhashmi comments on the debate with the #Qadianis” →

Intro
In the recent debate and in defense of MGA changing his position (tabdili-aqidah) on the alleged death of Eisa (as), Maulvi Razi alleged that Muhammad (Saw) denied the punishment of the grave (See 23:100, 23:101 in the Kadiani Koran)(azab-e-kabir)(also called barzakh), then changed later (See the clip on twitter). This is not true. There is no evidence of him denying it at any point. In fact, the opposite is true! He (saw) affirmed it from the very first time the matter was raised.

Continue reading “Maulvi Razi alleges that Muhammad (Saw) denied the punishment of the grave (azab-e-kabir), then changed later” →

Intro
29 April 2026 was a very important day for me. On the surface, it was the day of a significant first face-to-face meeting with the official team and missionaries of the Mirzai (Ahmadi) group in London (written by Suhail Bawa, son of Abdul Rahman Bawa Sahib). However, behind this, there were several incidents that occurred which clarified many things. These were moments that remained hidden from the camera’s eye, but in the mirror of reality, they carry great significance. Another significant incident occurred when, at the beginning of the discussion, Mr. Imtiaz extended his hand for a handshake to Razi and Raheel and Ibrahim Ikhlaf, but they refused, saying: “We cannot shake hands with you.” This incident effectively exposed the slogan of the Mirzai group, “Love for all, hatred for none” (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter).

This incident was later mentioned by Mr. Imtiaz on-air as well, which should serve as a point of reflection for ordinary Ahmadis too.

Firstly, when a former Qadiani, Abu Bakr, was present with me, an unusual reaction was observed from the opposing side. As soon as they saw him, they became visibly upset and formally imposed the condition that those who had left the Qadiani community would not be allowed to enter the room where the dialogue was taking place. This behaviour itself raises many questions.

During a break, colleagues from Khatm-e-Nubuwwat, Mr. Adnan Rashid and Mr. Imtiaz, called me inside twice to keep me informed about the situation. It was during this time that I had my first encounter with individuals from the Mirzai group, Raziullah and Raheel. In a sarcastic tone, they said, “Are these Imtiaz and Adnan Rashid your representatives?”

I immediately replied: “They are not just our representatives, but representatives of the entire Muslim world.”

To this, they further remarked, “Today they did not defend your كبار (elders/scholars); it seems you did not prepare them.”

I responded clearly:
“I have complete trust in them. There is no answer you have to the points they have raised. And as far as preparation is concerned, they have the help and support of Allah; they do not need any other backing.”

Furthermore, the conduct of the opposing side the previous night exposed another reality. Their outward appearance was one thing, while their inner reality was something else. In front of the public, they presented a soft and courteous face, but behind closed doors, their behaviour was entirely different. This contradiction made the reality of their claims and stance quite clear.

All these events reflect that the real truth is not limited to what happens on stage; rather, the conduct and behaviour behind the scenes also reveal a great deal.

Continue reading “Suhail Bawa, Behind the Scenes — 29 & 30 April, Wednesday 2026, Khatm-e-Nubuwwat Academy, London” →