Intro
In 1931, as #ahmadis were planning on taking over Kashmir and administering it as a #qadiani state. In this quote, the only educated son of MGA tells the world that his father would say that #ahmadis differ with Muslims on every single part of Islam. In fact, after 1923, the Ahmadiyya Khalifa ordered the common Ahmadi to stop doing Takfir. Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that #ahmadis differ with #muslims on every single part of Islam”
Intro
In July of 1935, the Ahmadiyya Khalifa felt the need to clarify his position on Ahmadiyya Takfir. From 1911 to 1922, the Mirza family had categorically called all Muslims who denied MGA (even silently) as Kafirs without any further clarification. This attitude of the Mirza family led to the split of 1914. After the Split, Muhammad Ali and the Ahmadiyya Khalifa argued over this topic extensively. However, after 1922-23, the Ahmadiyya Khalifa adopted a new attitude, he simply called Ahmadi’s as true Muslims, and called Muslims Kafir’s only in this strange and new terminology. In all of his writings and his brother’s (Mirza Bashir Ahmad) writings, they had never wrote that Ahmadi’s were “true muslims” and the rest of the Islamic world were Kafir’s as such. We then jump to 1935, even Lavan quoted this essay in his book. In the PDF you will find the Friday Sermon of April 26th, 1935 at Qadian by the Khalifa. In this speech, he clarifies that Muslims are only Kafir’s since Ahmadi’s are true Muslims. This edition of the ROR also contains data on the Quetta earthquake. Continue reading “Review of Religions of July 1935, pages 241-282 (Ahmadiyya Takfir and Quetta)”
Intro
Ahmadiyya takfir is a tricky subject, most people haven’t properly understood it. In this specific quote, Which is from 22 sep-1917, Al-fazal, page 2.
Mirza Mahmud (the Khalifa) says and calls his denial as denial of “bani Isreal” as denial of Mirza qadyani is denial of other prophets. He says his denial is denial of messenger of God. His denial is denial of Maseeh maud. However, just 6 years later (1923), and after WW-1, the Khalifa told #ahmadis to stop doing takfir. However, by 1931, the Khalifa was still saying that the Qadiani-Ahmadi version of Islam differs with all Sunni’s/Shia’s.
Furthermore, just a month earlier, on 8-21-1917, and also in the Al-Fazl, MGA was quoted as saying that the Islam of #qadianis and Muslims was different (See the quote in the below).
Continue reading “Al-Fazl, September 1917, proves Ahmadiyya Takfir towards all Sunni’s/Shia’s”
Intro
Firstly, this website is an unofficial source of information on the Ahmadiyya Movement. Ahmadis are not allowed to give official answers to any questions. Even the Ahmadi-Mullahs that we have encountered on social media always have a disclaimer on their accounts, which specify that these views are “theirs”, and not of the Ahmadiyya Movement. This is a legal complication that Ahmadis are taught to avoid. Thus, any and all answers from this website or any Ahmadi in particular are invalid. The only official answers are from the Ahmadi-Khalifas or in an official book by an Ahmadi Mullah aka cleric. MGA on 2:62. Continue reading “A fake Ahmadiyya response to our essays which expose Ahmadiyya Takfir from Ahmadi.answers.com”
Intro
As we all know, nowadays, the Ahmadi-trolls on social media are running around and denying that Ahmadis had ever done Takfir on anyone. The truth is, the soon to be Qadiani branch of Ahmadis began doing open Takfir on all Muslims (shias. sunnis, sufi’s, all muslims), in 1911, at that point they weren’t “qadianis” yet, since the split happened in 1914. The Split happened in 1914, and the Lahoris vs. Qadiani’s arguments began. They debated each other on a few topics, Prophethood, Takfir, Khilafat and Ismuhu Ahmad, the birth of Esa (As) was never an issue. The Lahori-Ahmadi position on Takfir was via Muhammad Ali in 1918 (See “The Split in the Ahmadiyya Movement”, page 124), he essentially said the deniers of MGA were not Kafir’s, whereas, the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud and his brother and family believed MGA to be a full fledged Prophet and thus deniers of the prophethood was Kafirs per the Quran (even the Lahori-Ahmadi’s via their denial of MGA’s prophethood). In Mirza Mahmud Ahmad’s 1911 essay, he wrote plainly that any deniers of MGA were Kafir’s, even those who hadn’t heard of MGA (he even quoted MGA’s letter to Dr. Khan of 1906). Muhammad Ali quoted Mirza Mahmud Ahmad’s famous essay of 1911 (which was initially revoked by the Khalifa, Noorudin), Khwaja Kamaluddin had also immediately written a response/clarification in 1911 wherein he asserted that the deniers of MGA were not Kafir. In 1914, the Al-Hilal of March-1914, (which was edited by the famous Maulana Abu Kalamazad, who also wrote an obituary on MGA wherein he stated that MGA died of cholera) claimed that Qadiani-Ahmadi’s seriously believed that deniers of MGA are kafirs absolutely. While Muhammad Ali was still at Qadian (March of 1914), he got published in the Pagham-e-Sulh and was against declaring Muslims as Kafirs in contrast to the group of Ahmadi’s who followed the new Khalifa. Continue reading “In 1923, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, the Ahmadi Khalifa, ordered Ahmadis to stop doing Takfir on Muslims”
Intro
The lies of Ahmadi people continue day by day. Ahmadi’s dont care, they are loyal to the Mirza family and gladly lie on their behalf. I recently came across an ex-Ahmadi’s video on the subject of Takfir and Ahmadiyya and felt moved to post it. In this video, the famous ex-Muslim, Ali Rizvi’s book “The Atheist Muslim”, is discussed, in his book Ali Rizvi mentioned his exchange with Qasim Rashid, and in terms of a specific quotation from MGA, wherein MGA clearly called all Muslims that reject him as non-Muslim. Continue reading “Ali Rizvi mentions the lies of Qasim Rashid in his book, in terms of Takfir from Ahmadis to Muslims”
Intro
We have found Ahmadiyya leadership editing out a certain reference in terms of Takfir in the 2009 online english edition of Tadhkirah. In, fact there were many changes, however, no reasoning is ever given. Ahmadiyya leadership just edits things out as they deem fit. They don’t tell us as to who ordered the removal or why. This is the level of deceit that Ahmadi’s have operated with over the past 100+ years.
You can also listen to Zia Rasul from the Aaqa Ka Ghulam youtube channel explaining this issue in Urdu herein, at the 21:04 mark).
Continue reading “2009 Tadhkirah vs. the 2004 Tadhkirah, in terms of Takfir”