Intro
Check out Bro Imtiaz’s video on this and my essay on 61:6 (61:7 in the Kadiani Koran).
In 1906, in the English-Review of Religions, MGA seems to have written that his God named his “Mirza Ghulam Qadiani”, he also said that he was named as such since this name equals 1300 when the Arabic letters are all counted together. It is an ancient system of writing any amount without ‘Arabic’ numerals in the Arabic language. It is more like Roman Numerals where alphabet denotes count, like XXIV is 24 in Roman numerals. It is memorized as abjad hawwaz huttee kaliman sa’fas qurshat sakhaz dadhagh! MGA mentions this in many places with many connotations. The problem is that he could include ‘Mirza’ in his name or not, depending on whatever whim he had at that time.
There is a so-called revelation by MGA ‘kalbun yamootu alaa kalbin’ — a dog died on a dog’ or ‘as a dog’. Kalb = dog = 52. And they say Bhutto was hanged at 52 years old. Now, how he was a dog remains to be explained. And why was Zia not a dog? Go figure. The scan in the below is taken from the Lahori-Ahmadi english translation of Kitab ul Barriya.
The scan
The Math
غلام
1000
30
1
40
====
1071
احمد
1
8
40
4
==
53
قادیانی
100
1
4
10
1
50
10
===
176
Chart of Gematrical values
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1898
Kitab-ul-Bariyyah, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 13, page 258
https://www.youtube.com/live/Y7RT0_kCMWs?si=0lxnzBYHJqMedqUK
Why did MGA claim that per the Quran, the Messiah and Mahdi would arrive in the 14th century? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
MGA claimed that his GOD named him Mirza Ghulam Qadiani – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
“”Allah has given me the name, Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani”, which equals 1300, and indicated that the Messiah would come in the 14th century””.
Scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________1902
Defence-Against-Plague.pdf, page 22
“””God gave the name Ghulam-e Ahmad saw [the Servant of Ahmad saw] to this Messiah, in order to point out to the Christians that their Messiah who they deem to be ‘God’ cannot compare to even a lowly servant of Ahmad saw”””.
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1905
Al-Hakam, October 17, 1905, page 10)(Quoted by Qazi Muhammad Nazeer in Truth Prevails
“These people inquire again and again where, in the Holy Quran, has the name been mentioned. They do not seem to be aware that Allah named me Ahmad. The pledge of bai’at is taken in the name of Ahmad. Is not this name found in the Quran?”
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Oct
BA-5, online English edition, page 483
BA-5, Urdu edition, page 360
“”Similarly, I received two titles from God Almighty: One I was named ummati [follower of the Holy Prophet sas], as is indicated by my name Ghulam Ahmad sas [i.e. the Servant of Ahmad sa s]; second, I was named, by way of reflection, Nabi [‘Prophet’], as God Almighty named me ‘Ahmad’ in the earlier parts of Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya and addressed me repeatedly by this very name.”””
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
The Qadiani-Ahmadi’s declared that MGA was “Ismuhu-Ahmad” in Quran 61:6, not Muhammad (Saw), then changed it later – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
3 Pingback