Intro
In Part-2 of Izala Auham (and BA5), MGA and his team of writers argued that the Messiah would appear in the 14th century per the Quran and hadith. However, the defenders of Ahmadiyya (ahmadi answers) seem to have totally avoided this quote in their response. The reality is that they mis-quote Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan and thus, their line of argument is totally fabricated from all angles. It needs deeper research however. Siddiq Hasan Khan and his son, Nuru Hasan, wrote the two books, respectively — Hujajul Kirama and Iqtiraab saa’ah. The quotes are taken out of context, and the authors themselves take the mention of 100, 200, 300 out of context and gratuitously add 1000 to them. It is well known that Dajjal and advent of Esa (as) was expected in early days (first 3 centuries) and then the interest died off until Suyuti, and then these two authors. These latter day authors added 1000 to the original Ahadith. Nurul Hasan ends his book saying that even if Mahdi does not appear, it does not change fundamental beliefs of Muslims, and that God decides when to raise him, and it may be that people become dejected and then God decides to raise him. This quote is also referenced in another article on Al-Islam web site. So, there is no Hadith or Quran verse that denotes a date and Nurul Hasan specifically says that no date was specified. In Izala Auham, MGA quoted 23:18 (23:19 in the Ahmadi Quran), the second half of it. “””and surely it is We Who determine its taking away””, MGA claimed that this verse equals 1274. In some type of weird mathematical method. Ahmadi scholars have connected 23:18 (23:19 in the Ahmadi Quran) to the return of Muhammad in the 14th century as the messiah. He goes on to quote 61:9, and claims that this verse related to himself, the Messiah, son of Mary, of the time.

It should be noted that in the very first edition of Arba’in, MGA and his team of writers wrote that “anbiya” had said that the Messiah would come in the 14th century, however, in the 2nd edition (1920), they wrote a footnote wherein it was stated that this was a clerical error and the word should have been “auliya”. Manzur Ahmad Chinioti explains this situation in this video. Watch my tik tok on this also. See our book review on Arba’in for details. Zia Rasul from the Aaqa Ka Ghulam youtube channel explains the entire story herein, see at the 3:30 mark).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________We quote it from Izala Auham

Ruhani khazain volume 3 page 464

“The Messiah, son of Mary, his arrival, in the last era, has a prophecy in the Quran-e-Shareef. From the Quran-e-Shareef, the Messiah will emerge after 1400 years (it is proven). Many scholar’s have given the same impression and believed it.” 

Transliteration

“Maseeh ibn Maryam kee akhree zamana mai anay kee Quran-ay Shareef mai paishgoi mujood hai. Quran-ay Shareef mai jo Maseeh ke nikal ne kee 1400 baras taak mudat tahrai hai. Bhot say auliya be apne mokar shafat kee ruh say is mudaat ko mantay hai.”
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
The Quote from Ahmadi answers
Izala-e-Auham, Part 2, Ruhani Khazain, Volume 3, Pages 468-469, taken from ahmadi.answers.com on 7-9-2020, https://ahmadianswers.com/ahmad/allegations/writings/century/

“This humble one came in an era which is the era in which the Promised Messiah should have appeared, because the Hadith Al Ayatu Ba’dal Mi’atain which means that grand signs would take place in the 13th century, clearly and categorically substantiates that the appearance or birth of the Promised Messiah take place in the 13th century. The fact is that smaller signs had begun to manifest themselves even from the blessed time of the Holy Prophetsaw. Hence, undoubtedly, al-ayat refers to grand signs, which could not have in any way manifested themselves within 200 years. As such, the scholars have come to an agreement that Ba’dal Mi’atain refers to the 13th century and Al-Ayat refers to grand signs which are the advent of the promised Messiah, Dajjal, Gog and Magog, etc. And every individual can understand that in this age, which is the era of the advent of the promised Messiah, no one has made the claim that I am the Promised Messiah, except this humble one. As a matter of fact, in this period of 1300 years there has never been a claim from any Muslim that I am the Promised Messiah”
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1900, Arba’in
Arbaeen 1920
1984, Ruhani Khuzain
Arbaeen R K Vol 17 2008 Edition

It should be noted that in the very first edition of Arba’in, MGA and his team of writers wrote that “anbiya” had said that the Messiah would come in the 14th century, however, in the 2nd edition (1920), they wrote a footnote wherein it was stated that this was a clerical error and the word should have been “auliya”. Manzur Ahmad Chinioti explains this situation in this video. Watch my tik tok on this also. See our book review on Arba’in for details.

Transliteration Arbaeen 1920
Second Edition printed 18 December 1920
Arbaeen No 2 – Page 22

Jis ko Aan hazrat salala ho Alaih wasalm aap izat daiytay hain, aour fermatay hain kay kaisee
khush kismat wo ummat hai jis kay Awal ser per main hoon, aour aakhir main MASIH MAOUD hai.

Aour hadisoon say saaf tour per sabat hai kay agarcha wo aik shakhas ummat main say hai
magar AMBIYAA kee us main shaan hai. Phir aisay shakhas kay haq main SALAT AOUR SALAM
keeyon ghair mozoon aour ghair mahal hai. Na maaloom kay un loggon kee aqaloon per kiaa
pathar (stone) paray kay jis shakhas ko tamaam nabi ibtadaiy duniya say Aan Hazrat salala ho
alaih wasalam tuk izat daytay aaiy hain, us ko aik aiyasa zaleel samaghtay hain kay SALAT AOUR SALAM bhee us per kehna haraam hai. yahee wajaah to hai kay hum baar baar un logon ko mutanabahy (warn/inform) kertay hain Kay khudaa say darow, aour samgoh (understand/realise) kay jis shakhas ko MASIH MAOUD ker kay biyaan fermayaa giaa hai, wo kutch mamooly aadmi naheen hai. Bulkay Khudaa kee kitaboon main us kee izat AMBIYAA ALAIH SALAM kay hum pehloo rakhee gaiee hai. Tumm agar naa maano tow tum per hamaara jabar naheen, laykin agar kitaabain daykho gay to yahee paow gay. Aour agar yay kaaho kay MASIH MAOUD to wo hai jo asmaan say utertaa daikha jaaiy gaa,

**footnote: Aan hazrat salala ho alaih wasalam ko Mairaaj kee raat main kisee nay naa charthaa daikha aour naa utertaa, to phir kiaa un logon kaa farzee masih Aan Hazrat SAW say afzal thaa.**

To yay Khudaa Taala per jhoot our us kee kitaab kee mukhalifat hai. Khudaa taala kee Kitaab
Quran Shareef say yai qataee faisla ho chukaa hai kay Hazrat Eisa Alaih Salam Fout ho gaiy hain. Taajub kay khudaa Taala to Quran Shareef kay kaee maqaam main Hazrat Eisa kee wafaat zaahir fermaata hai, aour aap logue us ko aasman say utaar raahay hain. Kiaa ub Quran Shareef kay kissay bhee mansoukh ho gaiy? Yay wohee Quran hai gis kee aik ayat sun (to hear) ker aik lakh sohaaba nay ser jhukaa diyaa tha.

Page 23:
Aap ko maaloom ho jaiy gaa kay masih kee nisbat Quran kia kehta hai. Aap yaad rakhain kay iis
qadar hayaat e masih per jo aap zoar daytay hain, yay ber khilaaf munshaa e kalaam Ilahi hai. Aiy azeezo yaad rakho kay jo shakhas aana thaa, aa chukaa, aour Sadi jis kay ser per masih maoud aana chahay tha, us main say bhee 17 beras (years) guzar gaiy, aour is sadee main gis per ummat kay AOULIYA kee nazrain lagee hooi theen, is main baqoul tumharay aik jhotta (false) saa mujadid bhi naa paidaa hooa, our mahez aik dajjal paida hooa, kiaa in shokhioun (mischiefs) kaa hazrat e izaat kee dergaah (court) main jawab daynaa naheen paraay gaa. Go kaysay hee dill sakhat ho gaiy hain, aakhir is qader to khouf chahayaa thaa, kay jo shakhas sadi kay ser per paida hooa, aour ramazan kay kasoof aour khasoof nay us kee gawahee dee, aour islam kay mojouda sanaaf (do not know the meanings) aour dushmanon kay matawaater (continous) humlon nay is kee zaroorat sabat kee aour AMBIYYA guzashta kay kashoof nay is per kataee (firm/absolute) mohar (stamp) lagaa dee kay woh CHOUDHAWEEN SADI kay ser per paida ho gaa, aour naiz yay kay PUNJAB main ho gaa.

DIFERENCES IN THE:
Arbaeen, part of Ruhani Khazian vol 17, pages 369 – 371, printed in 2008
corresponds with page 22 and 23 OF ORIGINAL BOOKLET PRINTED IN 1920.
PAGE 369

Jis ko Aan hazrat salala ho Alaih wasalm aap izat daiytay hain, aour fermatay hain kay kaisee
khush kismat wo ummat hai jis kay Awal ser per main hoon, aour aakhir main MASIH MAOUD hai. Aour hadisoon say saaf tour per sabat hai kay agarcha wo aik shakhas ummat main say hai
magar AMBIYAA kee us main shaan hai. Phir aisay shakhas kay haq main SALAT AOUR SALAM
keeyon ghair mozoon aour ghair mahal hai. Na maaloom kay un loggon kee aqaloon per kiaa
pathar (stone) paray kay jis shakhas ko tamaam nabi ibtadaiy duniya say Aan Hazrat salala ho
alaih wasalam tuk (her it means also/including) izat daytay aaiy hain, us ko aik aiyasa zaleel
samaghtay hain kay SALAT AOUR SALAM bhee us per kehna haraam hai. yahee wajaah to hai
kay hum baar baar un logon ko mutanabahy (warn/inform) kertay hain Kay khudaa say darow, aour samgoh (understand/realise) kay jis shakhas ko MASIH MAOUD ker kay biyaan fermayaa giaa hai, wo kutch mamooly aadmi naheen hai. Bulkay Khudaa kee kitaboon main us kee izat AMBIYAA ALAIH SALAM kay hum pehloo rakhee gaiee hai. Tumm agar naa maano tow tum per hamaara jabar naheen, laykin agar kitaabain daykho gay to yahee paow gay. Aour agar yay kaaho kay MASIH MAOUD to wo hai jo asmaan say utertaa daikha jaaiy gaa,

**footnote: Aan hazrat salala ho alaih wasalam ko Mairaaj kee raat main kisee nay naa charthaa daikha aour naa utertaa, to phir kiaa un logon kaa farzee masih Aan Hazrat SAW say afzal thaa.** To yay Khudaa Taala per jhoot our us kee kitaab kee mukhalifat hai. Khudaa taala kee Kitaab Quran Shareef say yai qataee (final/absolute) faisla ho chukaa hai kay Hazrat Eisa Alaih Salam Fout ho gaiy hain. Taajub kay khudaa Taala to Quran Shareef kay kaee maqaam main Hazrat Eisa kee wafaat zaahir fermaata hai, aour aap logue us ko aasman say utaar raahay hain. Kiaa ub Quran Shareef kay kissay bhee mansoukh ho gaiy? Yay wohee Quran hai gis kee aik ayat sun (to hear) ker aik lakh sohaaba nay ser jhukaa diyaa tha.

PAGE 370
……………………………………….
Aap ko maaloom ho jaiy gaa kay masih kee nisbat Quran kia kehta hai. Aap yaad rakhain kay iis
qadar hayaat e masih per jo aap zoar daytay hain, yay ber khilaaf munshaa e kalaam Ilahi hai. Aiy azeezo yaad rakho kay jo shakhas aana thaa, aa chukaa, aour Sadi jis kay ser per MASIH
MAOUD aana chahay tha, us main say bhee 17 beras (years) guzar gaiy, aour is sadee main gis
per ummat kay AOULIYA kee nazrain lagee hooi theen, is main baqoul tumharay aik chota (small/little) saa mujadid bhi naa paidaa hooa, our mahez aik dajjal paida hooa, kiaa in shokhioun(mischiefs) kaa hazrat e izaat………….

PAGE 371
…………kee dergaah (court) main jawab daynaa naheen paraay gaa. Go kaysay hee dill sakhat ho gaiy hain, aakhir is qader to khouf chahayaa thaa, kay jo shakhas sadi kay ser per paida hooa, aour ramazan kay kasoof aour khasoof nay us kee gawahee dee, aour islam kay mojouda sanaaf (do not know the meanings) aour dushmanon kay matawaater (continous) humlon nay is kee zaroorat sabat kee aour AOULIYA guzashta kay kashoof nay is per kataee (firm/absolute) mohar (stamp) lagaa dee kay woh CHOUDHAWEEN SADI kay ser per paida ho gaa, aour naiz yay kay PUNJAB main ho gaa………….
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
1984
November

The word Auliya is used, not Anbiya, and no footnote is given explaining it as a typo.


______________________________________________________________________________________________
1902-1903

Maulavi Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan Sahib also wrote in Hujaj-ul-Kiramah that he believed on the basis of strong evidence the the Promised Mahdi would appear at the turn of the fourteenth century. This is also quoted by MGA in Tohfah Golarviyyah, Ruhani Khazain, Volume 17, Pages 128-133).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
The quote from Ba5
See pages 482-483 of the online english edition

“””And while all this is happening, a trumpet will be blown from Heaven; i.e. God—through sending the Promised Messiah—will manifest Himself for the propagation of Islam. Then an inclination
towards Islam will develop in the pure-hearted people of every country throughout the world, and God will gather the blessed people of the entire earth into Islam to the extent He wills. Then will be the end. So, all the above have come to pass. Similarly, it was written in ahadith that the Promised Messiah would appear at the head of the century and that he would be the Mujaddid [Reformer] of the fourteenth [Hijri] century. So these Signs, too, have been fulfilled in this age.

It was also written that, by virtue of his birth, he would have a share of two centuries. And that he would be bestowed two names. And his birth would have a share of two lineages. And the fourth dual quality is that in his birth, too, he would be born as a twin. So all these Signs have become manifest. My sharing the two centuries—i.e. my being Dhul- Qarnain—is so established that there is no calendar of any nation of which my life has not spanned its two centuries.”””
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

What is “Hujaj-ul-Kiramah” by Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan of Bhopal?

https://youtu.be/mnJBTLw_0uk

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/25/mirza-tahir-ahmad-tells-the-world-in-the-90s-that-izala-auham-was-published-in-june-1891/

Izala Auham quotes (1890-1891)

What is “Hujaj-ul-Kiramah” by Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan of Bhopal?

From 1901 to roughly 1922 Ahmadis believed MGA=Muhammad

TUHFA-E-GOLARHVIYYAH by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1902)

In 1884, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that the Quran 61:09, 48:28 and 9:32 was also revealed to him

Who is Syed Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha, who worked as an Imam in Bhopal uptil 1891?

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/27/ahmadis-have-always-lied-about-the-publish-dates-of-izala-auham-1890/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-denied-the-physicality-of-the-miraaj-in-1890-in-izala-auham/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/18/muhammad-ali-writes-that-izala-auham-was-published-in-september-of-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/25/mirza-tahir-ahmad-tells-the-world-in-the-90s-that-izala-auham-was-published-in-june-1891/

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Mohammadi_Begum.html#cite_note-begum-8

B.A. Rafiq, “Truth About Ahmadiyya, online version, https://www.alislam.org/library/book/truth-about-ahmadiyyat/suspension-of-jihad/, Retrieved on 6-7-19).

vm.tiktok.com/ZMRyoNJb1/

“Let Jesus a.s. die for therein lies the glory of Islam”

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #izalaauham #1891