ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
You will see #ahmadis all over social media cussing at Muslims via calling them as Abu Jahl and the Jews as mentioned in the Quran. This is rude and disrespectful, this is not the sign of a persecuted community, the persecution is obviously self-generated. We blame #ahmadimullahs and the #mirzafamily directly for this. We don’t blame the average #ahmadi, we have sympathy on them. We know they can’t help it, they have been brainwashed, their minds are not their own.

In defense, we call #ahmadis as the people mentioned in the Quran, Chapter 2, verses 8-18
Is it fair for us to do the same? See the below, all of these verse describe the Ahmadiyya Movement.

Intro
Shah Wali Ullah is considered as the Mujadid of the 12 century by Ahmadi sources. He was a Hanafi scholar, in fact, the only version of Islam that was allowed in the Mughal and Ottoman Empire was the Hanafi school of thought and Sufi-ism. Shia-ism was essentially banned and suppressed. Iran was the only Shia state at that time. His father worked on the famous “”Fatawa ‘Alamgiri””, which was used extensively in the Ottoman and Mughal Empire.
Continue reading “Shah Wali Ullah (the mujadid of the 12th century), the end of prophethood and the physical return of Esa (as)” →

Intro
MGA claimed that per the Quran, the Messiah/Mahdi would come in the 14th century after Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah)(see Izala Auham quotes in the below). MGA quoted 24:55 and 3:123. However, the official commentaries of the Quran by Ahmadi’s deny this (see the official 5-volume commentary of 1988 and 2018). In 1893, via “Shahadatul Quran”, MGA claimed that 24:55 of the Quran indicated that the messiah would come 1400 years after Muhammad (saw)(see pages 107-108). Mirza Masroor Ahmad supported the same lie.

It should be noted that in the very first edition of Arba’in (1900), MGA and his team of writers wrote that “anbiya” had said that the Messiah would come in the 14th century, however, in the 2nd edition (1920), they wrote a footnote wherein it was stated that this was a clerical error and the word should have been “auliya”. Manzur Ahmad Chinioti explains this situation in this video. Watch my tik tok on this also. See our book review on Arba’in for details. Zia Rasul from the Aaqa Ka Ghulam youtube channel explains the entire story herein, see at the 3:30 mark).

In 2025, Razi quoted this hadith from Ibn Majah and asserted that this hadith announces the arrival of the Mahdi-Messiah in the 14th century, however, it doesn’t say anything like that. Then, Razi alleges that Nawab Hassan Siddiq Khan used this hadith to announce the pending arrival of the Mahdi in India in the 1880’s (this is unconfirmed).
Continue reading “Why did MGA claim that per the Quran, the Messiah and Mahdi would arrive in the 14th century?” →

Intro
#ahmadis are the most academically dishonest group of people in the whole world. Ahmadianswers, an unofficial/official Ahmadiyya website recently posted a video arguing that even Maulana Wahiduddin Khan also believed that Esa (as) had died. However, they didn’t give the whole story, they purposely left out all of the data on Maulana Wahiduddin Khan and his comments on Ahmadiyya beliefs. They also refuse to acknowledge that a Muslim can believe in the death of Esa (as), yet deny the prophethood of MGA. In fact, Sir Syed, Allama Iqbal, Ak Shaikh, Akber Chaudhry, Abu Kalamazad, and many others believed in the death of Esa (as) at age 33 and he will never return, they also don’t believe in the concept of the Mahdi. However, they reject MGA and call him a liar, and Maulana Wahiduddin Khan believed the same way. We have shown one quote in the below, however, in another book by the Maulana, “The Seeker’s Guide”, he calls Ahmadiyya beliefs as deviant (see page 100) (Link is broken).
Continue reading “Maulana Wahiduddin Khan called Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s prophethood as “a type of madness”” →