Intro
You will see #ahmadis all over social media cussing at Muslims via calling them as Abu Jahl and the Jews as mentioned in the Quran. This is rude and disrespectful, this is not the sign of a persecuted community, the persecution is obviously self-generated. We blame #ahmadimullahs and the #mirzafamily directly for this. We don’t blame the average #ahmadi, we have sympathy on them. We know they can’t help it, they have been brainwashed, their minds are not their own.
In defense, we call #ahmadis as the people mentioned in the Quran, Chapter 2, verses 8-18 Is it fair for us to do the same? See the below, all of these verse describe the Ahmadiyya Movement.
2:7—-Allah has set a seal on their hearts and their ears, and over their eyes is a covering; and for them is a great punishment.
2:8—And of the people there are some who say, ‘We believe in Allah and the Last Day;’ while they are not believers at all.
2:9—They would deceive Allah and those who believe, and they deceive none but themselves; only they perceive it not.
2:10—In their hearts was a disease, and Allah has increased their disease to them; and for them is a grievous punishment because they lied.
2:11—And when it is said to them: ‘Create not disorder on the earth,’ they say: ‘We are only promoters of peace.’
2:12—Beware! it is surely they who create disorder, but they do not perceive it.
2:13—And when it is said to them, ‘Believe as other people have believed,’ they say: ‘Shall we believe as the foolish have believed?’ Beware! it is surely they that are foolish, but they do not know.
2:14—And when they meet those who believe, they say: ‘We believe;’ but when they are alone with their ringleaders, they say: ‘We are certainly with you; we are only mocking.’
2:15—Allah will punish their mockery and will let them continue in their transgression, wandering blindly.
2:16—These are they who have taken error in exchange for guidance; but their traffic has brought them no gain, nor are they rightly guided.
2:17—Their case is like the case of a person who kindled a fire, and when it lighted up all around him, Allah took away their light and left them in thick darkness; they see not.
2:18—They are deaf, dumb and blind; so they will not return.”””””””””””””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Farhan Khan, “With love to Ahmadi’s”, page 79 12th Century Shah Wali Ullah
In his book Al-Musawwa Sharh al-Muwatta‟, a commentary on the famous book of Islāmic law by Imām Mālik, under the section “The Ruling of the Khawārij, the Jahmiyya and their likes”((Note: The Khawārij and the Jahmiyya were two deviant sects of Islām which no longer exist today as viable groups. Notice that Shah Wali Allah rejects the continuation of prophethood in a chapter about deviant groups of Islām.))), Shah Wali Allah al-Dehlawi writes:
وكذلك من قال ف الش خٌ نٌ أب بكر وعمر مثلًَ ل سٌا من أهل الجنة مع تواتر الحد ثٌ ف بشارتهما أو قال: ان النب -صلى عل هٌ وسلم-
خاتم النبوة ولكن معنى هذا الكلَم أنه لَ جٌوز أن سٌمو بعده أحد بالنب ،ً وأما معنى النبوة وهو كون الإنسان مبعوثاً من تعالى إلى الخلق
مفترض ال اعة معصوماً من الذنوب ومن البقاء، على الخ أ ف مٌا رٌى فهو موجود ف الْئمة بعده ، فذلك هو الزند قٌ . وقد اتفق جماه رٌ
المتأخر نٌ من الحنف ةٌ والشافع ةٌ على قتل من جٌري هذا المجرى و أعلم
Similarly, whoever claims concerning the two shaykhs [Abu Bakr and „Umar] for example that they are not [to be] the inhabitants of Paradise, even though it is mass narrated in the hadīth that they were given the good news [of entering Paradise]; or whoever states that the Prophet is the seal of Prophethood, but that this term means that no one after him can be named a “prophet”, and that as for that meaning of prophethood which is [a human sent by Allah to the people, obedience to whom is required, protected from sins and remaining in error] that, this (meaning of) prophethood can still be found in the leaders of the Community after him; then this person is a heretic (zindīq). Furthermore, the majority of the later Hanafī and Shāfi’ī scholars are unanimous in agreement that such a person deserves capital punishment, and Allah knows best.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Shah Wali Ullah on Prophethood, from Ahmadi’s Ahmadi sources quote Shah Wali Ullah, however, they give no context https://www.alislam.org/articles/important-references-khatam-e-nabuwwat/(Tafheemati Ilahiyyah pg. 53) ‘The meaning of the Holy Prophet being the Khataman Nabiyeen is that there shall not now appear a person whom God may appoint with a new Law for mankind, that is to say, there shall be no prophet who shall come with a new Law.’ ‘There cannot be an independent prophet after the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, who is not his follower and his adherent.’ (Al Khairul Katheer: pg 111)
Razi with Ahmadi answers recently posted this defense, however, it seems dubious
Al-Khair ul Kathir, pages 236-237
“”The reality (is that) the Promised Messiah is to have the light and image of the Holy Prophet (saw) in him. Many people think that the Promised Messiah will be an ordinary person from the Ummah. This is not true. he will be the true embodiment of the name of the Holy Prophet (saw) and his true copy. How can he be compared with an ordinary Muslim.”
In Fatawa-i-Alamgiri which was compiled by the eminent scholars of the Indian sub-continent at the command of Aurangzeb Alamgir, in the 12th century Hijri, it is recorded:
“A man who does not regard Muhammed (PBUH) as the final Prophet of God, is not a Muslim, and if such a man claims to be a messenger or prophet of God, he shall be proclaimed an apostate.” (Vol. 2, p. 263).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Imam Abu Hanifa on the end of prophets
A man in the time of Imam Abu Hanifa (80 A.H.-150 A.H.) laid claim to Prophethood and said “Let me show you the proofs of my prophethood.” The great Imam thereupon warned the people: “Anyone who asks of this man the credentials of prophethood, shall become an apostate, for the Prophet of God (pbuh) has explicitly declared: “No prophet will come after me.” (Manaqib al-Imam-i-Azam Abi Hanifa, Ibn Ahmad al-Makki, Vol. I, p.161, published in Hyderabad, India, 1321 A.H.)
Siddiqa, Ayesha. “Peace in Afghanistan.” (2019): 703-710. “The first significant name is Shah Waliullah (1703–62), a Hanafi scholar,”
^Shahid, Amir Khan. “DISPLACEMENT OF SHAH WALIULLAH’S MOVEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON NORTHERN INDIAN MUSLIM REVIVALIST THOUGHTS. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan 51.2 (2014). “It would not be out of context to cite a reference of Shah Abdul Aziz (1746-1824) which is provided by Manazar Ahsan Gilanithat someone enquired from Shah Waliullah whether the Shias were kafir. He maintained the different viewpoints among the Hanafi School of thought on the subject. The man was not satisfied and urged Shah Waliullah to give his own opinion. While getting the same answer he went away filled with rage…”
^ Jump up to:abAbbas, Mohammad. “Shah Waliullah and Moderation”. Islamic Research Foundation International, Inc. Islamic Research Foundation International, Inc. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
^“Shah Wali Allah”. Center for Islamic Sciences. Center for Islamic Sciences. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
^K.J. Ahmed, Hundred Great Muslims, Library of Islam, 1987.
——K.J. Ahmed, Hundred Great Muslims, Library of Islam, 1987.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
