ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
In Part-1 of the famous debate, Qadiani-Ahmadi’s have fully turned into “Lahori-Ahmadi’s” and denying MGA’s claim of being the literal 2nd coming of Muhammad (Saw) via Buruz and “The LAST PROPHET“. Instead, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s are claiming that MGA was only speaking in a “metaphoric-spiritual” manner, however, that is the Lahori-Ahmadi position (See the writings of Maulvi Muhammad Ali).

As part of his opening statement, Bro Imtiaz mentioned how Ahmadi’s believe that looking at the face of MGA is like looking at the face of Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah)(See Al-Badr, Oct-25, 1906 and the Al-Fazl of Aug-13-1944, See also the 1974 NA proceedings page 785, pdf page 410). If you want to see Muhammad (Saw), look at MGA at Qadian (naozobillah).

Bro Imtiaz also mentioned how MGA argued that he would die in the grave of Muhammad (Saw). In 1909, MGA alleged that God Almighty has entered me in Muhammad’s (saw) being, in everything, without even letting it (from me) to have a different name or a different grave (See RK-18, page 381, Nuzul Maseeh)(See pages 297-298, online English Edition). MGA also argued that from the hadith, it is clearly derived that in the end times, Prophet Muhammad (saw) will also appear in the world (See RK-18, page 384)(See page 300, online English Edition).

Bro Imtiaz explained how in 1902, MGA said that the truth is that the spiritual power of the holy Prophet (SAW) at the end of the 6th thousand (13th century in Mirza Ghulam), i.e. these days, is MUCH STRONGER, MORE COMPLETE and STRONGER than in THOSE EARLY YEARS. Nay, it is like the fourteenth (moonlit) night (full moon)(Khutbah Ilhamiya RK 16:271). MGA also said, Islam was a crescent at the time of Muhammad (Saw), but now it is like a full moon (Khutbah Ilhamiya RK 16:275). In 1902, MGA said that the person who makes a difference between MGA and Muhammad (Saw) has neither seen me nor recognized MGA (See Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, RK, V16, P. 258 – 259). MGA also claimed to be the FINAL BRICK of the prophets (See RK-16, Pg 178, Khutba-e-Ilhamiah). MGA claimed that in the palace of prophets, one brick was left (See Rk-16, Pg 177, Khutba-e-Ilhamiah and via Bro Imtiaz). MGA also claimed that the time of the manifest victory of the era of the holy Prophet has expired, and the second victory which was to be much greater and clearer then the first one had yet to be achieved. It was ordained that its time should fall during the times of the promised Masih (See Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, pages 193-194, and via RK16, p.288).

Ibrahim Ikhlaf in a nutshell: “Your 2 mins = Our 8 mins… or debate over.” “Moderator issue? End the debate right now.” “Livestream issue? Comply or leave.” “Cross-examination? Absolutely not- debate is over. 

Continue reading “Part-1 of the debate, FULL REVIEW, is MGA greater than Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah) #Qadianismontrial” →

Intro
In 2026 (May), @UmarElhashmi watched the “great debate” (#qadianismontrial) and observed/adjudged that Ibrahim Ikhlaf has NO knowledge of the Arabic language (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Ibrahim Ikhlaf seems to have mixed up the words Istigraaqiyya, istishraq and ishtishraqiyya, this is something that an average person can never do, so how is he a scholar? @UmarElhashmi also pointed out that Ibrahim Ikhlaf was reading off of his laptop screen.

@UmarElhashmi watched the recent debate with the Qadiani’s and has given his comments herein. Umar El Hashmi pointed out mistakes in reading the Quran by Ibrahim Ikhlaf, he mis-pronounced 49:14 of the Quran, specifically, the verse says, “Yud Khu Lil”, however, Ikhlaf mispronounces it as “Yud Khee Lul” (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter and on the Twitter account of @UmarElhashmi). @UmarElhashmi also pointed out how Maulvi Raheel called the famous Musaylima and “Musaylima bin Khattab”, which is totally incorrect.

@UmarElhashmi also pointed out how Maulvi Raheel said “ba ta loo” instead of “ba ta la” (See the clip on Twitter). Maulvi Raheel wasn’t reading from the Quran or hadith, however, he seems to be reading a Legal Maxim in Fiqh. In summary: Every verb in Arabic, on a beginner level, has 3 root letters and must follow the verb form: 1. Fa ‘a la 2. Fa ‘u la 3. Fa ‘i la There is no such thing as: Fa ‘a loo So apply now the letters: baa taa and laam to the scale and you get: Ba ta la You can NEVER get: Ba Ta Loo And that is so long as it’s a verb, which is the case in that principle he tried to sound smart when quoting: إذا جاء الاحتمال، بَطَلَ الاستدلال Izaa jaa-al-ihtimaal, ba ta la-l-istidlaal. It can NEVER be ‘ba ta loo’ Ever. So when he says ba ta loo… it’s a huge facepalm moment, just like their “al-qawl al-sahaabi” which I called out in my YouTube video under the video sections “exposing their ignorance of Arabic” — as well as their saying “alif-laam istishraaqiyyah” and only realizing that’s wrong by reading it on screen— exposed that and called it out.

Continue reading “@UmarElhashmi explains how Ibrahim Ikhlaf has NO knowledge of the Arabic language” →

Intro
@knowledge_is_power14 is a disabled Qadiani-Ahmadi living in the UK and acting tough on TikTok. Qadiani-Ahmadi have been ordered by Mirza Masroor Ahmad to flood TikTok with their silly tabligh. These nerds were similarly on Paltalk about 20+ years ago, Khurram too. They read off of a script and have never conducted research on their own. At one point, @knowledge_is_power14 was saying his name was Subha Sadique.

In 2026 (Feb), I got his whatsapp number and sent him some messages and he immediately made personal attacks on me and my father. I told him that Ahmadi’s like Khurram are scared I will physically hurt them. He responded by asking me for a fight. Check out the screenshots.

In 2026 (Apr), he showed up (with a walking cane) and asked Bro Imtiaz a question at a Sunni masjid in the UK. @knowledge_is_power14 asked about the famous book, “Tahdhir al-Nas” and asked if this book proved that an “Ummati-Nabi” could come. In response to this, Bro Imtiaz asked @knowledge_is_power14 to come to the front and read out the quote and explain it, however, this was refused (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter and TikTok). Bro Imtiaz said that if he is incapable of doing that, he should apologize.

Continue reading “Who is @knowledge_is_power14?” →

Intro
In 2026 (Apr), Maulvi Razi claims that Muhammad (Saw) disobeyed Allah when he prayed for Abdallah Ibn Ubayy (a munafiq)(naozobillah)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). However, this is not the case. In Quran 9:80-9:84, Allah offers him a choice and the prophet avails it. The prophet (saw) prays the hypocrite’s janaza, and AFTER that the prohibition verse was revealed. After the revelation (9:84) he never prayed for a hypocrite again (See Tafsir ibn Kathir, page 490). They lie upon rasoolAllah (saw) to dig Mirza out of the hole. Muhammad (saw) never disobeyed Allah. See the Qadiani-Ahmadi commentary on 9:84.

Continue reading “Maulvi Razi accuses Muhammad (saw) of praying for the munafiqeen, then Allah told Muhammad (saw) that this was a mistake (naozobillah)” →

Intro
Sheikh Asrar Rashid has commented on the recent debate (#qadianismontrial)(39:55 time stamp). Sheikh Asrar Ahmad explained how met Bro Imtiaz in the UK and how the Qadiani’s kept throwing red herrings in this debate.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

https://www.youtube.com/live/XDlVydyRWOg?si=JGZCApq364HZeTXa

(3) Asrar Rashid – Official – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/c/AsrarRashidOfficial

Asrar Rashid Official (@ShAsrarRashid) / X

https://x.com/ShAsrarRashid

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #qadianismontrial

Intro
In the recent debate (#qadianismontrial)(1:56:20 and 1:56:50), as part of his opening statement and in an attempt to reject all the references wherein MGA was called the Final prophet, last Adam, last Mahdi, final messiah, takfir was done vs. Muslims, Maulvi Razi denied the Al-Fazl newspaper (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). However, it should be noted that Mirza Nasir Ahmad did the same in 1974 at the National Assembly, MGA also denied that Al-Hakam was an official newspaper in 1899. In 1954, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa also denied the Al-Fazl. Thus, this is normal Qadiani behavior.

Continue reading “While #qadianismontrial, Maulvi Razi denied Al-Fazl, claimed that it goes against the writings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad” →

Intro
@UmarElhashmi watched the recent debate with the Qadiani’s and has given his comments herein. Umar El Hashmi pointed out mistakes in reading the Quran by Ibrahim Ikhlaf, he mis-pronounced 49:14 of the Quran, specifically, the verse says, “Yud Khu Lil”, however, Ikhlaf mispronounces it as “Yud Khee Lul” (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter and on the Twitter account of @UmarElhashmi). @UmarElhashmi also pointed out how Maulvi Raheel called the famous Musaylima and “Musaylima bin Khattab”, which is totally incorrect.

@UmarElhashmi also pointed out how Maulvi Raheel said “ba ta loo” instead of “ba ta la” (See the clip on Twitter). Maulvi Raheel wasn’t reading from the Quran or hadith, however, he seems to be reading a Legal Maxim in Fiqh. In summary: Every verb in Arabic, on a beginner level, has 3 root letters and must follow the verb form: 1. Fa ‘a la 2. Fa ‘u la 3. Fa ‘i la There is no such thing as: Fa ‘a loo So apply now the letters: baa taa and laam to the scale and you get: Ba ta la You can NEVER get: Ba Ta Loo And that is so long as it’s a verb, which is the case in that principle he tried to sound smart when quoting: إذا جاء الاحتمال، بَطَلَ الاستدلال Izaa jaa-al-ihtimaal, ba ta la-l-istidlaal. It can NEVER be ‘ba ta loo’ Ever. So when he says ba ta loo… it’s a huge facepalm moment, just like their “al-qawl al-sahaabi” which I called out in my YouTube video under the video sections “exposing their ignorance of Arabic” — as well as their saying “alif-laam istishraaqiyyah” and only realizing that’s wrong by reading it on screen— exposed that and called it out.

In 2026 (May), @UmarElhashmi watched the “great debate” (#qadianismontrial) and observed/adjudged that Ibrahim Ikhlaf has NO knowledge of the Arabic language (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Ibrahim Ikhlaf seems to have mixed up the words Istigraaqiyya, istishraq and ishtishraqiyya, this is something that an average person can never do, so how is he a scholar? @UmarElhashmi also pointed out that Ibrahim Ikhlaf was reading off of his laptop screen.

Continue reading “@UmarElhashmi comments on the debate with the #Qadianis” →