Intro
In the newest edition of the official 5-volume English Commentary of the Quran, under the verses 46:31-32 (46:32-33 in the Qadiani Quran), the Qadiani’s believe that this verse is about a Reformer (MGA)(Tafseer-e-Sagheer is unknown on this). MGA’s comment’s on these verses are unknown also. Interestingly, Maulvi Muhammad Ali was silent on these verses in his famous 1917 English commentary of the Quran and his subsequent 1920 edition. Thus, this entire line of argumentation seems to have come as oral tradition from the Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi’s like Sufi Muti-ur-Rahman Bengali (was in the USA, 1928 to 1948), Maulvi Muhammad Yusuf Khan (was in the USA, 1921 to 1975?) and even as early as Muftree Muhammad Sadiq (was in the USA, 1920-1923).
In 1934, Elijah Muhammad used it as his main thesis on why Wallace Farad was a prophet and should be followed.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1934
In 1934, Elijah Muhammad used it as his main thesis on why Wallace Farad was a prophet and should be followed.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
The Holy Quran with Five Volume Commentary (Vol 5)
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/quran-english-five-volume-5?option=toc&page=37
In Aug-1934, Elijah Muhammad presented W.D. Fard as a prophet only–Final Call newspaper
In Aug-1934, Elijah Muhammad presented W.D. Fard as a prophet only–Final Call newspaper
Wallace Fard Muhammad – Wikipedia
Who is Mr. Muhammad Yusuf Khan? A crooked Ahmadi Maulvi in the USA, 1921-1976
Who is Sufi Muti-ur-Rahman Bengali (1900-1955)? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
This history of #Ahmadiyya in the #USA – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad
1 Pingback