Intro
In 1906-1907, and via “Haqiqatul Wahy” (see pages 171-172, online english edition), MGA accidentally confessed that Muhammad (saw) was the final prophet to be born. However, the Qadiani’s purposely mis-translated the Urdu word “paida” in terms of Adam (As) as “created” and in terms of Muhammad (saw), “paida” was translated as “raised” in their attempt to hide the words of MGA. Thus, in both instances it was willfully mistranslated.
Nevertheless, the Urdu of (“Haqiqatul Wahy”, see pages 171-172, online english edition) is as follows:
“”Quran Shareef may yay tarhreef kee hay, kay Allah, aur zaat hai, jo rubbul alaemeen, aur, rahman aur raheem hai, jisnay zameen aur asmaan ko chay din may banaya, aur Adam ko paida kee-a, aur rasul pajay, aur kitabay paijee, aur sab kay akhirat, Muhammad (Saw) ko paida kee-a, jo khatam ul Anbiya….
We have found at least 3 cases of willful mistranslations. The first is about the Arabic word “Majazi”, which means “metaphorically”. Which was translated as “metaphorically” by Maulvi Muhammad Ali in 1915 (See pages 53-54, 226 and the first few pages of the book itself via PDF 4/677), and it should be noted that this translation was never objected to by the Qadiani’s, in fact, they never even attempted to explain what this meant. 113 years, the Qadiani’s finally translated “majazi” as “not in its original sense [of being raised independently]”
(See pages 878-879). The second case is that of MGA saying that Muhammad (Saw) was the final prophet to be born (see pages 171-172). The Qadiani’s purposely mis-translated the Urdu word “paida” in terms of Adam (As) as “created” and in terms of Muhammad (saw), “paida” was translated as “raised” in their attempt to hide the words of MGA. Thus, in both instances it was willfully mistranslated. The 3rd case is that of MGA claiming that his god told him that he makes “mistakes” (in arabic as akhta)(via a long revelation of MGA). When the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s translated this, since they were embarrassed, they lied and translated it as “i will miss”, instead, of “I will make mistakes”. MGA even translated it into Urdu and said “main sawab bhi karoon ga aur khata bhi karoon ga”, thus proving the meanings (page 124).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1915
Prophethood in Islam — www.aaiil.org
See PDF 4/677
In 1915, as the Lahori-Ahmadi’s had already split with the Qadianis. Muhammad Ali was busy refuting the Qadiani doctrines in terms of the prophethood of MGA, Takfir and the verse of Ismuhu Ahmad. Muhammad Ali’s most compelling argument was that MGA had written in 1907, in the supplement to Haqiqatul Wahy as follows:
Supplement, Istifta, p. 64
“Prophethood has admittedly been terminated with the advent of our Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. There is now neither any book besides the Quran, the best of the Scriptures nor any Shari’ah other than Shari’ah of Muhammad. The Holy Prophet, who is the best of all creation, has given me the name ‘prophet’ which is a reflection of countless blessings earned by obeying him faithfully. I see no virtue of my own. I owe accomplishments to this holy soul. My prophethood in the divine lingo means only abundance of communion and communication. Let the curse of Allah be upon him who aspires anything beyond this and arrogates or pulls his neck away from the yoke of obedience to this Holy Prophet. Our Messenger (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), is undoubtedly the Khatam al-Anbiya and with him has terminated the chain of the messengers; so no one can now claim perfect prophethood after our Messenger, the Chosen one. Nothing is now left after him except abundance of communion and communication and even that cannot be received without obedience to the Holy Prophet, who is the best of mankind. I declare it on solemn affirmation that I have attained this status only by following the beams of light radiated from his prophethood, and that I have been called a prophet by God only metaphorically and not by way of reality.”(See PDF 4/677).
___________________________________________________________________________This supplement was in Arabic only
I would have to guess that Ahsan Amrohi wrote this supplement, since Maulvi Abdul Kareem was already dead, Nooruddin probably helped.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________2018
See pages 878-879
Haqiqatul-Wahi – Philosophy of Divine Revelation (alislam.org)
….prophethood came to an end after our Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and there is no Book after al-Furqan [the Discrimination; i.e. the Holy Quran] which is superior to all earlier Scriptures, neither is there any new shariah after the Muhammadan Shariah.
However, the Best of Mankind declared me to be a Prophet, and this is a matter of being his reflection due to the blessings of complete submission. And I find no excellence within me; all that I have obtained is through his holy soul. By calling me a Prophet, Allah means only [that I receive] abundant revelations and converse [with God]. May the curse of Allah be upon the one who aspires to anything beyond that, or considers his own person as something special, or frees his neck from the yoke [i.e. complete submission] of the prophethood [of the Holy Prophet sa].
Surely, our Messenger is Khatamun-Nabiyyin [the Seal of the Prophets] and the chain of
Messengers has ended with him. Therefore, no one has the right to claim prophethood after our
Messenger, the Chosen One, in an independent manner, and nothing has remained after him except dialogue [with Allah] in abundance. Even this is conditional upon following [the Holy Prophet sa] and is not granted unless one is a true follower of the Best of Creation. I swear by God that I have been blessed with this spiritual station only by following the radiant rays of the light of the Chosen Prophet sa. I have been granted the name ‘Prophet’ by Allah, not in its original sense [of being raised independently], but as a subordinate Prophet.
________________________________________________________________________________________________The Qadiani-Ahmadi’s lied, not Muhammad Ali
Mirza Masroor Ahmad ordered this cover-up. If you notice, they took out the word metaphor (in arabic as MAJAZ)and totally replaced it with “original sense” and they removed, “not by way of reality” and wrote: “but as a subordinate Prophet”.
________________________________________________________________________________________________The Urdu version of Haqiqatul Wahy’s supplement, the urdu translation
I may add here that on the Qadiani Jamaat website there is an Urdu translation of this Arabic section of Haqiqat-ul-Wahy (see link), and in this translation the above statement has been quite correctly rendered as:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Muhammad (saw) is prophet #124,000, Esa (as) is prophet number #123,999 – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Muhammad (saw) is prophet #124,000, Esa (as) is prophet number #123,999
Did MGA get Wahy Nubuwwat or Wahy Nubuwwat or Wahy-i-Wilayat? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
2 Pingback