Intro
In the Quran, Chapter 2 verse 36, Allah tells Muslims that it wasn’t simply Eve’s fault that Adam (as) ate from the forbidden tree. In fact, Allah tells Muslims that Adam (as) and Eve were both deceived by Satan and thus, Allah denied the concept of Original Sin in Christianity (See Tafsir ibn Kathir). Check out Bro Imtiaz’s short video explanation on this herein. Again, see Bro Imtiaz explaining it herein (time stamp, 1:52:54).

However, in 1902, via Tohfah Golarhviyyah, MGA blamed Eve (aka Hawwa or Hawa), and accused her of committing 4 sins. Eve=Ḥawwāʾ (حَوَّاء) and is referred to as the “mother of mankind”. The Qur’an doesn’t mention her by name, but it does say that Adam was created with a “mate” who was made from the same nature and soul as him (See 4:1 of the Quran).

In 1906, in “Ahmadi aur Ghair Ahmadi Main Kia Faraq Hay?” (page 476), MGA alleged: “””shirk started with a woman. a woman is its founder, i.e., from Eve (Eve is the founder of polytheism). She was the one that abandoned Allah’s command and obeyed Shaytan instead. And supporters of this great polytheism i.e., that of Christianity, are also women”””. 

In 1907, MGA also argued that Adam (as) and Eve were born as twins.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Tohfa Golravia page 187, RK Vol-17, page 273 footnote
Via K. Hashmi

“Remember, it was the sin of Hawwa that she did obey the order of Shaitan and broke the command of God. In fact she did not commit one sin rather she has committed four sins. Number one was, she has insulted the command of God and considered it to be false. Secondly, she believed in the enemy of God and the eternally accursed Shaitan to be true. Thirdly, she did not only believe in it but she has practically broke the command of Allah and committed sin. Fourthly Eve a.s. not only broke the command of Allah but acting as a representative of shaitan deceived Adam. Then She deceitfully made Adam eat the fruit which was forbidden. Thus she was strongly held sinful by God whereas, Adam was considered as incapacitated

 Scan

______________________________________________________________________________________________
QTafsir | Allah tests Adam

 

Allah tests Adam

Allah’s statement to Adam,

﴿ وَلَا تَقۡرَبَا هَـٰذِهِ ٱلشَّجَرَةَ ﴾

(but come not near this tree) is a test for Adam. There are conflicting opinions over the nature of the tree mentioned here. Some said that it was the grape tree, barley, date tree, fig tree, and so forth. Some said that it was a certain tree, and whoever eats from it will be relieved of the call of nature. It was also said that it was a tree from which the angels eat so that they live for eternity. Imam Abu Ja`far bin Jarir said, “The correct opinion is that Allah forbade Adam and his wife from eating from a certain tree in Paradise, but they ate from it. We do not know which tree that was, because Allah has not mentioned anything in the Qur’an or the authentic Sunnah about the nature of this tree. It was said that it was barley, grape, or a fig tree. It is possible that it was one of those trees. Yet, this is knowledge that does not bring any benefit, just as being ignorant in its nature does no harm. Allah knows best.” This is similar to what Ar-Razi stated in his Tafsir, and this is the correct opinion. Allah’s statement,

﴿ فَأَزَلَّهُمَا ٱلشَّيۡطَـٰنُ عَنۡہَا ﴾

(Then the Shaytan made them slip therefrom) either refers to Paradise, and in this case, it means that Shaytan led Adam and Hawwa’ away from it, as `Asim bin Abi An-Najud recited it. It is also possible that this Ayah refers to the forbidden tree. In this case, the Ayah would mean, as Al-Hasan and Qatadah stated, “He tripped them.” In this case,

﴿ فَأَزَلَّهُمَا ٱلشَّيۡطَـٰنُ عَنۡہَا ﴾

(Then the Shaytan made them slip therefrom)

means, “Because of the tree”, just as Allah said,

﴿ يُؤۡفَكُ عَنۡهُ مَنۡ أُفِكَ ﴾

(Turned aside therefrom (i.e. from Muhammad and the Qur’an) is he who is turned aside (by the decree and preordainment of Allah)) (51:9) meaning, the deviant person becomes turned aside – or slips – from the truth because of so and so reason. This is why then Allah said,

﴿ فَأَخۡرَجَهُمَا مِمَّا كَانَا فِيهِ‌ۖ ﴾

(And got them out from that in which they were) meaning, the clothes, spacious dwelling and comfortable sustenance.

﴿ وَقُلۡنَا ٱهۡبِطُواْ بَعۡضُكُمۡ لِبَعۡضٍ عَدُوٌّ۬‌ۖ وَلَكُمۡ فِى ٱلۡأَرۡضِ مُسۡتَقَرٌّ۬ وَمَتَـٰعٌ إِلَىٰ حِينٍ۬ ﴾

(We said: “Get you down, all, with enmity between yourselves. On earth will be a dwelling place for you and an enjoyment for a time.”) meaning, dwelling, sustenance and limited life, until the commencement of the Day of Resurrection.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1895 in Arya Dharam:

Urdu Transliteration—-“”””jasay Hazrat Hawa Hazrat Adam ki pasli sa nikali gae aisay he har yak larkay ki joroo us ki pasli sa nikali gae ho””””

“””Just like Hazrat Hawa was created by rib of Hazrat Adam same as each boy’s wife was created from his rib. (rk vol 10 Aariya Darham page 39)”””

1

______________________________________________________________________________________________1902

Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 15, pp. 485-486,Tiryaqul-Qulub

MGA argues about the birth of Adam (as). See Brother Obaidullah’s explanation herein. MGA says that he was born as a twin. MGA also alleges to have communicated with the mid-wife about this birth and got some sort of testimony.

Scan

1902
Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 15, pp. 479, Tiryaqul-Qulub

MGA argues that Adam (as) was born a twin. See Brother Obaidullah’s explanation herein. 

______________________________________________________________________________________________
1906
“Ahmadi aur Ghair Ahmadi Main Kia Faraq Hay?” (page 476)

MGA alleged:

“””shirk started with a woman. a woman is its founder, i.e., from Eve (Eve is the founder of polytheism). She was the one that abandoned Allah’s command and obeyed Shaytan instead. And supporters of this great polytheism i.e., that of Christianity, are also women”””.

Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1907,
pages 253-254, online english edi
tion and page 569

“””Muslims who were gifted with spiritual visions have foretold that the Promised Messiah—who is the last Khalifah and Khatamul-Khulafa’ [Seal of the Khulafa’]—is like Adam in that he would be born at the end of 6th Millennium, just as Adam was born at the end of the sixth day. Moreover, like Adam, he would be born on Friday and would be a twin birth. Just as Adam was born in the manner of a twin—Adam first, and then Eve—similarly, the Promised Messiah would be born twin. So, Allah be praised and thanked that I am the fulfilment of this prophecy of the mystics. I, too, was born a twin at dawn on a Friday with the sole difference that the first to be born was a girl whose name was Jannat—and she went to Jannat [Paradise] after a few days and after her I was born. Sheikh Muhy-ud-Din ibn-e-‘Arabi has recorded this prophecy in his book Fusus, and has also written that he [the Promised Messiah] would be of Chinese descent. In any case, these three prophesies reinforce one another. Because they have been fulfilled, they have acquired the status of certainty that no sensible person can deny.””

Page 569
“””It was, therefore, necessary that the like of Adam who, in other words is referred to as the Promised Messiah, should be born at the end of the sixth millennium which is symbolized by Friday, the day on which Adam was born. So was I brought into being by God. Thus, according to all this, I was born in the sixth millennium. And this is a strange coincidence that I was born on a Friday according to the calendar in use. Also, just as Adams [the progenitors] were born male
and female, so was I born as a twin. A girl was with me who was born first and then I was born after her. These are the facts of my life which provide the seeker after truth with clear evidence. In addition, there are thousands of other Signs some of which have already been recorded by
way of illustration.””

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

TUHFA-E-GOLARHVIYYAH by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1902) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

TUHFA-E-GOLARHVIYYAH by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1902)

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Adam (as) was born a twin (in pairs), totally unislamic – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Adam (as) was born a twin (in pairs), totally unislamic

What is “Ahmadi aur Ghair Ahmadi Main Kia Faraq Hay”? by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (What is the difference between Ahmadi’s and Non-Ahmadi’s?) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

What is “Ahmadi aur Ghair Ahmadi Main Kia Faraq Hay”? by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (What is the difference between Ahmadi’s and Non-Ahmadi’s?)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism