Intro
In 2025, Ahmadi’s use 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) to argue that a “Masaduq-Rasul” would come after Muhammad (Saw), i.e., MGA (See the Qadiani-Ahmadi argument on 3:81 [3:82 in the Kadiani Koran]). It should be noted that MGA seems to be totally silent on 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran). In 1988, via the official 5-volume commentary of the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid, it is not mentioned at all that 33:7 means that after Muhammad (Saw) a “Musadiq Rasul” would appear, i.e., MGA.
In Sep-2024, Bro Imtiaz showed (4:13:26 timestamp and at 20:55) how Ahmadi’s in 2025 are openly disagreeing with MGA on 3:81 of the Quran (3:82 in the Qadiani Quran)(see via Ibn Kathir). Modern day Ahmadi’s like Fathe Islam and Ansar Raza allege that MGA is the final “Musadaq-Rasul” and that MGA didn’t bring any new Kitab or Hikmah. They also didn’t mention the implications of a Jalali Nabi in the future, would this Jalali Nabi then be the last “Musadaq-Rasul”? Nevertheless, Qadiani’s also connect 33:7 (33:8 in the Kadiani Koran) and make non-sensical arguments and infer that Muhammad (Saw) also promised to follow a “Musadaq-Rasul” in the future, with MGA being the inference (naozobillah). At 26:30, Mirza Tahir Ahmad presents 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran). In 1989, (Time stamp 29:38) Mirza Tahir Ahmad questioned why the Muslim scholars never quoted 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) and asked themselves as to why Muhammad (Saw) also took the covenant (this is a blasphemous question). It should be noted that on the night of the famous Miraj of Muhammad (saw), ALL the prophets were present and prayed behind Muhammad (saw) and thus agreed to the “Covenant of the Prophets” (See Sahih Muslim-172). Qadiani’s will totally avoid this fact, in fact, on the same night, Muhammad (Saw) met Eisa (As) and Eisa (as) said that he had some tasks remaining.
In 1989, Mirza Tahir Ahmad commented on 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). At 0:14, Mirza Tahir Ahmad begins reciting 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). At 1:45, Mirza Tahir Ahmad gives the translation. At 4:10, Mirza Tahir Ahmad starts talking about the Ahmadiyya concept of Hell. At 11:30, Mirza Tahir Ahmad starts on 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). At 12:24, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that the covenant of the prophets (as mentioned in 3:81 and 33:7) was taken before any of the prophets were even born. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that this was an “in-born” teaching in nature. Mirza Tahir Ahmad infers that all the prophets agreed to this while they were subconscious. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that prophets come from a class wherein it is in their nature to submit, to such a degree, that they will believe anyone sent from God, as long as they fulfil certain conditions. Mirza Tahir Ahmad scoffs at the scholars and says that they have said that this “Covenant of the Prophets” happened somewhere, like a physical location and time and Allah held them all as witnesses. At 14:57, Mirza Tahir Ahmad explains how the “Covenant of the Prophets” was made between God and the Prophets. At 21:54, Mirza Tahir Ahmad explains why every prophet has been included in the “Covenant of the Prophets”. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that prophets aren’t against each other, they all believe in each other, they are bound by duty. At 24:41, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) means that prophets can’t call themselves as the last, this verse implies more (naozobillah). At 26:30, Mirza Tahir Ahmad presents 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran). At 29:38, Mirza Tahir Ahmad questions why the Muslim scholars never quoted 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) and asked themselves as to why Muhammad (Saw) also took the covenant. At 31:35, Mirza Tahir Ahmad mentioned that the followers of all the prophets are “kept in mind” in terms of understanding this verse. At 33:12, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that the prophets agreed to this covenant like the leaders of nations and their followers are all ultimately held responsible. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that it is the responsibility of the Muslim Ummah to keep this covenant. At 35:00, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that Muslim scholars were afraid to comment on 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) because it would imply new prophets after Muhammad (Saw). At 35:31, Mirza Tahir Ahmad quotes Maudoodi, and alleges that Maudoodi wrote this “covenant” was taken by every single prophet. Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that Maudoodi denied the idea that Muhammad (Saw) also promised to follow a Rasul after him. At 38:28, Mirza Tahir Ahmad quotes “Allama Razi” (Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (1149–1209) and alleged that he wrote in favor of the Ahmadiyya position that “followers of prophets” were the real people who held the “Covenant of the Prophets”. At 42:25, Mirza Tahir Ahmad said that even Muhammad (saw) agreed that after him a Rasul would come. Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that this verse 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) proves the theory that a “subordinate-prophet” (Ummati Nabi) can be born. At 46:08, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that since Muhammad (saw) was mentioned as a “party” to 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran), this makes it mandatory that a Rasul come after Muhammad (saw). At 52:05 Mirza Tahir Ahmad again alleges that per (Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (1149–1209), 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) and 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) is about the followers of prophets (just like MGA wrote in Haqiqatul Wahi). At 56:20, Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that some Pakistan scholar also said that Muhammad (Saw) was a party to “The Covenant of the Prophets”. At 58:17, Mirza Tahir Ahmad quoted Wherry’s comments on 3:81, Wherry accused Muhammad (Saw) of fabricating the entire story from the Talmud.
In Oct-2021, Ansar Raza debated Muhammad Shaikh (deviant) and Ansar Raza said that he considers MGA as the “Musadaq Rasul” as mentioned in 3:81. Starts at 2:26, at 7:03, Ansar Raza says that MGA is the “Musadaq Rasul”. At 4:52, Ansar Raza says that the Quran refers to Eisa (as) also as the “Musadaq Rasul”, via 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran).
In Dec-2025 (13:27 time stamp)(54:40 too), Maulvi Razi alleged that that Muhammad (Saw) said that the Messiah will do tasdiq of Muhammad (Saw) by being his musadiq (via 3:81, 3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). 33:7 of the Quran (33:8 in the Kadiani Koran) is also discussed.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1960’s, Tafseer-e-Sagheer on 3:82 and 33:8
Click to access Tafseer-3-82.pdf
Click to access Tafseer-33-8-and-9.pdf
In Tafseer e Sagheer, Mirza Bashiruddin mentions that the Previous Prophet will give Basharah of the Coming Prophet and that everyone brings Iman on him once he arrives. In terms of 33: 8 and 9 he is saying that every prophet is given the basharah of the coming prophet.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1988
In 1988, via the official 5-volume commentary of the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid, it is not mentioned at all that 33:7 means that after Muhammad (Saw) a “Musadaq Rasul” would appear, i.e., MGA.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
https://alislam.org/quran/app/33
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2021/07/12/who-is-malik-ghulam-farid/
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 3:81 of the Quran (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 3:81 of the Quran (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran)
Esa (as) told Muhammad (Saw) that he has some tasks from Allah to complete before the FINAL HOUR
https://sunnah.com/muslim:172
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2024/10/29/mirza-masroor-ahmad-says-that-a-jalali-nabi-can-come-in-ahmadiyya/
http://m.qtafsir.com/Surah-Aal-e-Imran/Taking-a-Pledge-From-the-Proph—
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad
9 Pingback