Intro
Fakhr al-Din al-Razi naturally puts all the views together and supports the view that Eisa (as) was raised up to Allah alive (4:158, Rafaa-hoo). Body and soul (See Tafsir al-Razi, Vol 8 and vol 11). Excellent explanations for tawaffaa and istawfaa (See 83:2). He makes references to Eisa (as) being taken up through an opening in the roof and more (via Ibn Abbas, via Ibn Kathir). That every Jew and Christian in the end of time must believe in Eesaa AS before the death of Eisa (AS)(See 4:159). Fakhruddin Razi presented 6 “ishkaliat” or “issues” with the substitution theory and then presented an answer to each issue. Then ended with Allah knows best.
Furthermore, Fakhruddeen talks about taqdeem wat-ta-kheer. He also dismisses the biggest and main Qadiyaani argument that the return of Eesaa AS doesn’t break the finality of prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Thus, he considers the Qadiyaani claim to be weak/flimsy (See Tafsir al-Razi, Vol 8 and vol 11).
In 1989, Mirza Tahir Ahmad quoted “Allama Razi” (Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (1149–1209)(38:28) and alleged that he wrote in favor of the Ahmadiyya position that “followers of prophets” were the real people who held the “Covenant of the Prophets”. At 42:25, Mirza Tahir Ahmad said that even Muhammad (saw) agreed that after him a Rasul would come. Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that this verse 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) proves the theory that a “subordinate-prophet” (Ummati Nabi) can be born. At 46:08, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that since Muhammad (saw) was mentioned as a “party” to 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran), this makes it mandatory that a Rasul come after Muhammad (saw). At 52:05 Mirza Tahir Ahmad again alleges that per (Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (1149–1209), 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) and 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) is about the followers of prophets (just like MGA wrote in Haqiqatul Wahi). At 56:20, Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that some Pakistan scholar also said that Muhammad (Saw) was a party to “The Covenant of the Prophets”. At 58:17, Mirza Tahir Ahmad quoted Wherry’s comments on 3:81, Wherry accused Muhammad (Saw) of fabricating the entire story from the Talmud.
On June-20-2025, Ahmadi’s presented True Islam Uk Urdu stream vs. Bro Imtiaz. —At 26:19, Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Zia starts speaking and also gives commentary on 33:40. He says it’s not the Urdu word Khutum, Muhammad (saw) isn’t the ender/finisher of the prophets. He admonishes Muslims in Pakistan as such. He says if Muslims believe that Allah will stop speaking (kalam), then this doesn’t help to raise the status of Muhammad (Saw). He says that we should a commentary which elevates the shining status of Muhammad (saw). He says that “Ghair-Ahmadi” (Muslims), give the commentary that “prophethood is finished”, “NO prophets can come”. He says that we should check if the other verses of the Quran support this idea or not. He says that Muslims need to show a verse from the Quran which clearly cuts off prophethood, he alleges that 33:40 is disputed. He says it again, he desperately want’s to see the verse wherein prophethood is fully cut off. He also quoted Fakhr al-Din al-Razi in terms of how verses of the Quran explain the Quran. He also says that Ahmadi’s believe that now NO prophet can come that doesn’t have the seal of attestation of the prophethood of Muhammad (Saw). He says it’s a huge gift if someone comes into the Muslims has Allah speaks to him abundantly. He presents 22:75 (22:76 in the Kadiani Koran) as evidence for the continuation of prophethood. He says this only one verse in support of the continuation of prophethood, he has others. He then presents 7:35 (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran) as the second verse in support of the continuation of prophethood in the Muslim Ummah. He quotes Suyuti and alleges that Suyuti called the “sons of Adam” refer to the people of the end times just as much as any other era. Thus, these are the 2 verses that Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Zia is presenting as proof (of the continuation of prophethood) that Allah is always choosing Rasul’s (he calls them Nabi’s at times) from among men as well as Angel’s.
In Aug-2025, this Tafsir was mentioned vs. a Qadiani-Ahmadi from Kababir, Israel named Nur @Ahmadi_muslim.
Scans
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Fakhr al-Din al-Razi – Wikipedia
Ibn Abbas supported the substitution theory – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
RAFFA in the quran, a historical perspective – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
6 Pingback