Intro
“Diya’ul-Haqq” (The Torch of Truth)(also pronounced as Zia ul Haq) was published by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers in 1895 and is a book of 75 pages in Urdu (see Hidden Treasures).
The Christian journal, Nur Afshan, dated September 13-1895 published an article in which it was said that 12 months had passed and Athim was still alive. MGA issued a leaflet in which he explained that he had not yet fixed a time for Athim’s Death. Twelve months were the limit if he had taken the oath.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad mentioned the birth of his youngest surviving son, Mirza Sharif Ahmad in connection with his pray duel vs. Abdul-Haqq aka Abdul Haq Ghaznavi.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Diya’ul-Haqq, pp. 8-9, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 9, pp. 256-257
Via Hidden Treasures
“”The reason of writing this book is that even after issuing four leaflet, a simple fact is not yet clear to Christian missionaries. My prophecy about ‘Abdullah Atham had been fulfilled. It is unfortunate that Christian missionaries did not carefully read these leaflets and still using misleading language and repeatedly stressing the absurd claim that the Prophecy did not fulfill. But we have fulfilled the obligation that we had, that is, had Atham not recognized the truth, which was the integral condition of the prophecy (as it is claimed), then he is invited to take an oath in public meeting that he did not recoil and get his reward of four thousand rupees. But Atham Sahib has refused to take an oath. His claim is that his religion did not allow him to take the oath. This is based on pure fabrication and lie. His elders have always taken oath. However, Dr. Henry Martyn Clark issued a filthy leaflet in Amritsar which reflected his odious personality, in which he maintained that swearing in our religion is like eating pork by Muslim, then St. Paul who had taken oath all his life had been eating pork all his life and St. Peter did the same thing, how this had become illegal (haram) in case of ‘Abdullah Atham. Everybody knows that among Christian taking of oath is not only permissible but in some cases they are obliged to take oath. British Courts which did not coerce anyone going against their religion, did not keep Christians out of purview of taking of oath. And it is on record that even Atham Sahib had taken oath in Courts.
What would have been better that these Christian missionaries should have forced him to take an oath or force him to pay compensation for putting Christians in such an embarrassing situation or they should have issued a leaflet that in reality Atham Sahib was a liar.
But instead of adopting this course, they had come out in open using abusive language and they advanced this lame excuse that Atham Sahib did not accept Islam openly. But, any fair minded person could understand that the condition mentioned in the said prophecy did not contain this wording “if Atham Sahib accept Islam openly then he would escape the death otherwise not.” The said prophecy only contain the simple word: “recoil”, then this wording would have made him to accept the truth privately, so to maintain that the prophecy demanded accepting the truth openly is baseless””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
See Diya’ul Haqq, p. 33–34, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 9, p. 294, published by Islam
International Publication Ltd., 2021.
Via Arbain, online English edition, page 33
Via Tadhkirah
“””It did not behove him to enter into this affair except in fear’ indicates that if one does not com
prehend something stated by a reformer, there is no harm in holding a discussion with due respect, good intention and purity of heart. But the matter should not reach the point of enmity and harshness, because that would result in loss of faith and the title of ‘Abu Lahab””.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Last Title Page of Diya’ul-Haqq, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 9, p. 323
Via Tadhkirah
MGA claims that the birth of Mirza Sharif Ahmad was a divine sign and promise:
“””As an answer to the nonsense of ‘Abdul-Haqq, God Almighty had vouchsafed to me a revelation, which was published in Anwarul-Islam, that He would bless me with a son. So all praise and gratitude be to Allah, that according to the prophecy a son was born to me on Dhi Qa‘adah 27, 1312 AH, May 24, 1895 CE who was named Sharif Ahmad.”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Diya’ul-Haqq, p. 8, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 9, p. 319, Announcement attached to the Pamphlet
Via Tadhkirah
“”Sometimes a prophecy with a hidden meaning is vouchsafed as a trial for people so that God Almighty might demonstrate to them the limitations of their understanding. I have already written that, as stated in a hadith of the Holy Prophetsa, this prophecy was meant to be a trial for the weak-hearted. It was, therefore, fulfilled in a manner which requires insight for its understanding, but it has other essential aspects which will appear later, as is indicated in the words of the prophecy about laying bare the real truth.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
An Introduction to the Hidden Treasures of Islam
Click to access Hidden-Treasures-of-Islam.pdf
The Nur Afshan magazine and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Who is Mirza Sharif Ahmad (1895-1961)? The son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Who is Mirza Sharif Ahmad (1895–1961)? The son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad
Leave a Reply