Intro
In 1897-1898, MGA alleged that Tahdhir al-Nas (1870) was a book in his library (See RK-13, page 95)(See 16:05 time stamp).
In the case of Muhammad Qasim Nanautavi and his writings on the end of prophethood in Tahdhir al-Nas, #ahmadis incorrectly claim that Nanautavi believed that prophethood was open after Muhammad (Saw) for new prophets. This is a total lie. Muhammad Qasim Nanautavi only said that it is Allah’s business whether there are other worlds or not, and Allah could have parallel universes wherein additional prophets might be working and etc (See Maulvi Muhammad Ali , “The Last Prophet”, see page 52, 1922). Ahmadi’s have been using these false arguments for about 100 years and refuse to stop. Mufti Muneer Ahmed Akhoon explains it all herein too.
It should also be noted that Nanotvi [founder of Madressah Deoband], and a renowned Christian Priest and a renowned Hindu priest at “Fair for God-Consciousness” in 1876. The audience can access the proceedings of this here (link). I can only feel sad for the audience that cannot read Urdu because this is an immensely entertaining read even for people who don’t agree with any of the three schools of thought. Qasim Nanotvi was an exceptional scholar, no doubt. He did not request for days upon days to give written responses like Mirza Ghulam Ahmed sahab used to do. He did not do insult or ridicule any of the religions he was debating with. He exhibited exceptional, intimate and accurate knowledge of both Christian and Hindu scriptures. All this in real time with an audience right in front of him. Ahmadis might want to appropriate this piece of work and claim that Nanotvi learnt from Mirza Ghulam Ahmed, but it is a fact that this happened decades before Mirza Ghulam Ahmed sahab appeared on the scene.
In June of 2025 (3:19:46 time stamp), Maulvi Razi quoted “Tadhir un Nas” by Nanotvi (page 29) on a True Islam UK livestream and argued that Muslims believe that every single prophet is the zill of Muhammad (saw). On Bro Imtiaz’s stream (14:33 time stamp), he explained this matter further. Bro Imtiaz explained how Muslims have used this word “zilli” in a specific context and MGA did not use the same terminology.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The data
https://www.deoband.org/2010/12/history/clarifying-misconceptions-about-tahdhir-al-nas/
Translated by Zameelur Rahman
Question:
Do you consider any being better than the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace)?
Answer:
Our belief and the belief of our elders is that our chief, our master, our beloved and our intercessor, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and grant him peace), is the best of all creatures and the best of them in the presence of Allah (Exalted is He). None is comparable to him, rather [none] come close to him (Allah bless him and grant him peace) in proximity to Allah (Exalted is He) and the elevation of his rank in His presence. He is the chief of the Prophets and Messengers and the seal of the purified and the Prophets as established in the texts. This is what we believe and acquiesce to Allah (Exalted is He). Our elders have expressed this in more than one book.
Question:
Do you allow the existence of a prophet after the Prophet (upon him blessing and peace), while he is the Seal of the Prophets and the meaning of his (upon him be peace) statement “there is no prophet after me” and those [statements] resembling it, have been mass-transmitted, and ijma’ has convened on this? What is your opinion of one who allows the incidence of this despite the presence of these texts? Have any of you or your elders said this?
Answer:
Our belief and the belief of our elders is that our chief, our master, our beloved and our intercessor, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and grant him peace), is the Seal of the Prophets and there is no prophet after him, as Allah (Blessed and Exalted is He) said in His Book, “But he is the messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets” (33:40). This is established in many hadiths that are mutawatir in meaning, by consensus of the ummah. Far be it that one of us said something contrary to this, since the one who denies this is according to us a disbeliever because he denies decisive and unequivocal texts.
Yes, our teacher and our master, chief of the intelligent scrutinisers, Mawlawi Muhammad Qasim al-Nanotwi (Allah Exalted is He have mercy on him), produced a novel insight by his critical mind, completing his sealship (khatamiyyah) in a complete manner and perfecting it in a perfect manner, as he (Allah Exalted is He have mercy on him) said in his treatise entitled Tahdhir al-Nas, the upshot of which is that:
Sealship is a genus under which are two species:
The first of them is “chronological sealship” (khatamiyya zamaniyya) which is that the time of his prophethood (Allah bless him and grant him peace) occurs after the time of the prophethood of all other Prophets and he is thus a chronological seal of their prophethood.
The second is “essential sealship” (khatamiyya dhatiyyah), which is that by the essence of his (Allah bless him and grant him peace) prophethood, the prophethood of all the Prophets is sealed and culminates in it. Just as he (Allah bless him and grant him peace) is the seal of the Prophets in time, he (Allah bless him and grant him peace) is also the seal of the Prophets in essence, since all that is accidental is terminated by that which is essential, culminate in it and do not surpass it.1
Since his (Allah bless him and grant him peace) prophethood is essential and the prophethood of other Prophets is accidental, because their prophethood (upon them be peace) was secondary to his (Allah bless him and grant him peace) prophethood and he is the most perfect and honourable particular, the pole of the domain of prophethood and messengership and the medium of its contraction, he is [both] the chronological and essential seal of the Prophets.2 His sealship is not limited to chronological sealship since it is neither a big virtue nor an increase in his rank that his (Allah bless him and grant him peace) time comes after the time of the Prophets before him3, rather complete supremacy, extreme elevation, splendid glory and radiant pride reaches its utmost when his (Allah bless him and grant him peace) sealship is [both] essential and chronological. As regards to when it is limited to chronological sealship, his supremacy and his (Allah bless him and grant him peace) elevation in its perfection is not attained and his complete and comprehensive excellence is not acquired.
This insight from him (Allah Exalted is He have mercy on him) became apparent in his demonstration of the magnitude of his (Allah bless him and grant him peace) rank, the immensity of his proof, his exaltation and his veneration as concluded by the verifiers (muhaqqiqun) from our masters, the ‘ulama, like al-Shaykh al-Akbar [ibn al-Arabi], al-Taqi al-Subki and the Pole of Existence Shaykh ‘Abd al-Quddus al-Gongohi (Allah Exalted is He have mercy on them). The mind of many of the ancient ‘ulama and the erudite intellectuals, in what we believe and perceive, did not reach the pavilions of his courtyard.
This [belief], according to the Indian innovators, is disbelief and misguidance. They whisper to their followers and their friends that it is denial of the sealship (Allah bless him and grant him peace)4. [This is] far, very far! By my life, this is undoubtedly the most slanderous calumny and the greatest falsehood and slander. Nothing prompted them to this except contempt, malice, envy and hatred for the people of Allah (Exalted is He) and the elite of His servants. This is how the Divine Pattern (sunnat Allah) proceeds when it comes to His Prophets and His Friends.
Al-Muhannad ‘ala l-Mufannad ya’ni ‘Aqa’id ‘Ulama Ahl Sunnah Deoband, pp. 49-53
- If something is described as having an attribute that is essential, removal of that attribute will negate its essence; for instance, a “square” essentially has the attribute of being “four-sided”, and once it is “three-sided” or “five-sided” it is no longer a “square”. If something is described as having an attribute that is accidental, removal of that attribute will not negate its essence, like if a particular square was coloured red, removal of that colour would not negate it being a square.Here, the prophethood of the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) is described as essential i.e. its removal will negate his essence, while the prophethood of all other Prophets is described as accidental i.e. if it was hypothetically removed, it would not affect their essences. Furthermore, Mawlana Qasim Nanotwi distinguishes between essential and accidental prophethood by explaining that “the one who has an accidental attribute, his attribute is derived (muktasab) from the one who has an essential attribute, and the one who has an essential attribute, his attribute is not derived (ghayr muktasab).” (Tahdhir al-Nas, p. 4) He uses sunlight as an illustration, since the light in the sun is not borrowed, but when it reflects onto foreign objects, the light in those objects are accidental and borrowed. For proofs cited by Mawlana Nanotwi in support of this view, that the prophethood of the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) is essential and the prophethood of other Prophets is accidental, see next footnote. [↩]
- Some of the proofs for this which Mawlana Qasim Nanotwi cites are as follows:1. He writes, “just as he is the Prophet of the ummah, he is the Prophet of Prophets,” quoting the verse of the Qur’an, “[Remember] when Allah took the covenant of the Prophets: ‘That which I have given you of scripture and wisdom, then comes to you a Messenger [i.e. the Prophet Muhammad (Allah bless him and grant him peace)], confirming what is with you; you will surely believe in him and help him” (3:81) (Tahdhir al-Nas, p. 4). This verse illustrates that the prophethood of the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) is given precedence to the prophethood of all other Prophets.This interpretation is supported by the exegesis of al-Subki who said, “If we assume he came in the time of [earlier Prophets], he would have been sent to them [as a Messenger] and it would be a prophethood and messengership inclusive of all His creation from the time of Adam to the Day of Resurrection, and the Prophets and their peoples would be from his ummah. Hence the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) is the Prophet of the Prophets (nabi al-anbiya). Were his mission to coincide with the time of Adam, Nuh, Ibrahim, Musa and ‘Isa, it would be incumbent on them and on their peoples to believe in him and render him help. For this [reason] ‘Isa will come in the end times with his Shari’ah.” (Quoted by ‘Allamah ‘Abd al-Hayy al-Lucknawi in his endorsement of Tahdhir al-Nas, p. 39)This passage from al-Subki also shows that hypothetically assuming the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) came before other prophets is a legitimate supposition and does not entail factual possibility. Mawlana Nanotwi hypothesises in a similar manner, but this was unfortunately misconstrued by some to mean factual possibility.2. The hadith, “I was a Prophet while Adam was between spirit and body” (Sunan al-Tirmidhi, Musnad Ahmad), as it indicates the prophethood of the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) was essential and predated Adam’s creation, while the prophethood of the other Prophets was contingent (mentioned in Tahdhir al-Nas, p. 7). That this meaning has a connection with the term Khatam al-Nabiyyin is indicated by a similar hadith transmitted by al-Bayhaqi and Ahmad from al-‘Irbad ibn Sariyah that the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) said, “I was the Seal of the Prophets with Allah, while Adam was still in clay,” which indicates that the sealship that is intended here is essential, not chronological.3. The hadith, “If Musa were alive amongst you, he would have no option but to follow me” (Musnad Ahmad), again indicating the prophethood of other Prophets was secondary to his prophethood (mentioned in Tahdhir al-Nas, p. 4). [↩]
- This argument was put forward long before Mawlana Nanotwi by the early hagiographer, al-Hakim al-Tirmidhi (d. 320), in his work Khatm al-Awliya. After explaining the deep spiritual significance of the term Khatam al-Anbiya, including that it means that all the perfections of prophethood combined in the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace), he responded to the common understanding that the term was restricted to chronological sealship by saying, “What is the virtue in this, and what is the knowledge in this?” He then cited a narration, indicating the term khatam denotes virtue and excellence. (See: Kitab Khatm al-Awliya, Edited by Othman I. Yahya, Imperial Catholique, Beirut, pp. 338-342)Mawlana Nanotwi also lists several reasons why the verse (33:40) in which the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) is described as Khatam al-Nabiyyin must be in the context of praise, including that no other neutral quality, like lineage, colour or shape, are mentioned in the Qur’an in respect to his prophethood, and when describing great historical personalities, neutral qualities that some may misconstrue as blemishes, are usually not mentioned (see Tahzir al-Nas, pp. 3-4) [↩]
- The clearest passage in Tahdhir al-Nas, showing Mawlana Nanotwi did not deny chronological sealship and in fact strongly supported it, is found on pages 9-10. After citing the narration “there is no prophet after me” and explaining that it is mutawatir (mass-transmitted) in meaning, and that there is ijma’ on the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) being the last Prophet, he says, “just as the one who denies the number of rak’ats [of salah] is a kafir, the one who denies the chronological sealship is a kafir.” (p. 10). Since the book was written as a response to a query on the athar of Ibn ‘Abbas, it should be noted that ‘Allamah ‘Abd al-Hayy al-Lucknawi who endorsed this work, wrote in his endorsement that this hadith confirming the existence of prophets on other earths is sound and authentic and, although the other earths had “final prophets” relative to their own earths, the finality of our Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) is absolute and includes the prophets on all earths; and he did not suggest in any way that Mawlana Nanotwi’s book contradicted this view. [↩]
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
https://x.com/UmarElhashmi/status/2051306927435489450
I am not Deobandi or Barelwi, but I must emphasize that utmost respect should be shown when discussing the scholars of Deoband. The Qadiyanis have not been able to use this passage quoted below any better than they do with every other traditional scholar outside Deoband: they quote without understanding, and with misrepresentation. The seal Allah has placed on their hearts in ability to understand things is not a justification for us to harbor animosity towards those scholars they misleadingly cite. Note: Everything I write below is as someone who has studied the science of Aqeedah under Syrian scholarship. I did not study Aqeedah at all under Deobandi scholarship, so there are no grounds for anyone to claim bias here, for or against anyone. Regarding this quote, by Allah I’ve understood it as something very simple, yet many have overcomplicated it due to either (1) bias from their upbringing, or (2) the inability to comprehend how a single term can be used interchangeably based on its meaning. PREFACE: It’s important to understand that chronological order doesn’t inherently hold any significance. This is an intellectual principle. Just as being physically above or below something doesn’t, in and of itself, imply superiority or inferiority— similarly, being before or after doesn’t, in and of itself, imply superiority or inferiority. If this is understood, then when the Prophet ﷺ is honored with the title “last of prophets,” it is not an honor due to being the last in a chronological line — otherwise that, as a principle — would automatically necessitate Isa ﷺ is superior to Musa ﷺ and likewise for every other prophet: they must be superior to Adam ﷺ, yet no one argues for such. But no, it is not necessitated from chronological order alone that a person’s status changes. The chronological order of last and first can both exist while being superior— and it’s example is: Muhammad ﷺ is the last chronologically, and the most superior; whereas the Sahabah are the first of us chronologically, and they’re also the most superior — so there is no correlation in and of itself. But Him ﷺ being mentioned as “the last prophet” was in a maqaam of praise— would Allah praise one with something un-praiseworthy? No, so it is known that his khaatmiyyat is a status and honor that coincides with him being the very last. They don’t contradict each other, we must believe in both. So now if I asked you: If, hypothetically, prophet Muhammad ﷺ was sent before Isa ﷺ, would it mean his ﷺ status is inferior and Isa ﷺ is superior? No, of course not. Don’t we all agree on this? Yes! Then know: that when Imam Nanotwi is referencing khaatmiyyat in this passage, this is exactly what is meant: it is a reference to his ﷺ honor in being given that title, and not a reference to his chronological order. Thus: “If, hypothetically, a prophet was to be born after Muhammad ﷺ , it would not affect his khaatmiyyat — in terms of his chronological order and he can still be the ‘last’ prophet.” This is an incorrect belief, this is what the stupidity of Qadiyanis understanding of texts concludes But: “If, hypothetically, a prophet was to be born after Muhammad ﷺ , it would not affect his khaatmiyyat — in terms of his highest honor.” Then this is a correct statement by unanimity of Ahlulsunnah, and its example is to suppose our Prophet ﷺ was born after Nuh ﷺ, and Ibraheem ﷺ was to come after him: He ﷺ would still be the most superior. But when people begin fights over semantics, no one wins except Shaytan. Sure, it maybe could have been worded better or clarified— but who he spoke this to were people of understanding so to clarify the obvious to them was not needed. Wallahi upon reading this the very first time, I understood it instantly as explained above, without having asked anyone regarding it, and did not find any theological issues incoherent with Ahlulsunnah. And Allah knows best.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Qasim_Nanautavi
Were ilzaami jawab/insults necessary like Mirza Ghulam Ahmed sahab made them? A Comparison with Qasim Nanotvi of Deoband.
byu/ParticularPain6 inislam_ahmadiyya
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #Nanautavi
2 Pingback