ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
The Syrian scholar al-Buty aka Muhammad Said Ramadan Al-Bouti (Arabic: مُحَمَّد سَعِيد رَمَضَان ٱلْبُوطِي, romanized: Muḥammad Saʿīd Ramaḍān al-Būṭī) (1929 – 21 March 2013) claims that Shaltut changed his view, adopted the majority view during his last illness, and then buried all documents connected with his old views (See Sa’id Ramadan al-Buty, Kubra al-Yaqiniyyat, (Beirut: 1994), 352), in English as “The Greatest Universal Certainties”. 

The provided transcript describes a significant theological reversal attributed to Sheikh Mahmoud Shaltoot, a former Grand Imam of Al-Azhar. According to the speaker, Shaltoot initially dismissed traditional beliefs regarding the physical ascension and return of Jesus, often mocking those who held such views. However, while suffering from a debilitating illness, he reportedly issued a formal deathbed repentance in the presence of witnesses like Dr Ibrahim Salqini. During this retraction, he allegedly renounced his previous stances on prophetic descent and his controversial leniency regarding certain interest-based financial transactions. The narrative serves as a stern warning to believers, urging them to scrutinise the motivations of religious scholars carefully. Ultimately, the source emphasises that intellectual reputations can be misleading, as some figures may prioritise personal gain or external influence over sacred tradition.

Continue reading “The Syrian scholar al-Buty claims that Shaltut repented!” →

Intro
In 2026 (Jul), Maulvi Razi was reviewing the recent debate between Godlogic and Muhammad Hijaab. In this video, Maulvi Razi said that Muhammad (Saw) never doubted his prophethood, not even for a second. Maulvi Razi even quoted 53:17-18 of the Quran (53:18-19 in the Kadiani Koran). Maulvi Razi even admitted to using an ilzami jawab vs. Christians and alleging that Jesus Christ (as) of the Bible thought he failed his mission, since he uttered, “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani”)(Matthew 27:46 or Mark 15:34). MGA also alleged to have received “”Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani” for himself.

However, when it comes to Maulvi Razi (and other Ahmadi’s) explaining why MGA was confused about his prophethood for 20 years, he normally accuses Muhammad (Saw) of being unsure of his prophethood (naozobillah).

Continue reading “Maulvi Razi says that Muhammad (saw) never doubted his prophethood (2026), Razi forgot….” →

Intro
In 2026 (Jul), I was sent Mohamed Osman Salih’s 1976 University of Edinburgh doctoral dissertation which seems to discuss Tawaffa and Raf’a, in this document, this person alleged that Ka’b al-Ahbar was the Muslim who fabricated the idea that Eisa (as) never died and “taken” to Allah (naozobillah)(Mohamed Osman Salih’s is a total deviant, denies miracles and is not scholar and was always against classical Islam)(this was also confirmed by Brother Omar from Jeddah). However, if you look at the document, there is no reference and it says “perhaps” (see page 380). Furthermore, this person didn’t even try look this up in Al-Tabari and see how was quoted, which is the required homework.

Nevertheless, as of 7-11-26, I only found Ka’b al-Ahbar relating that Eisa (as) will be at the end of the ummah, which has noting controversial in it (See page 381). Again, most people don’t do complete research, only half, whatever suits their preconceived notions. In fact, MGA and Ahmadiyya literature has never quoted Ka’b al-Ahbar as the culprit who poisoned Abu Hurrarya (ra) and Ibn Abbas (ra) and made them fabricate stories about Eisa’s (as)(naozobillah) physical “taking” and physical return”.

It is important to note that on page 382, this document says that “sources other than Tabari” on Raf’a. That is hilarious! Page 382 also mentions the lies of Wahb ibn Munabbih, and I agree, everything that he said is Isra’iliyat, his view matches MGA’s view in 1891, i.e., that Eisa (as) died for a few hours and was revived, this was also erroneously supported by Imam Malik, Ibn Hazm and others like Sheikh Imran Hosein, Sheikh Asrar Rashid explained all of this recently too.

Continue reading “What did Ka’b al-Ahbar relate about Eisa (as)?” →

Intro
In 2026 (Jul), a deviant guy named Nabeel Alkhalidy supported the Qadiani’s as he gave comments over the recent debate between Sheikh Asrar Rashid and Maulvi Razi. In his videos, Nabeel Alkhalidy proved to be so bias that even said that the Qadiani’s are sincere people and Muslims should accept them as Muslim. Nabeel Alkhalidy totally ignored the defiant behavior of Maulvi Razi and how Maulvi Razi admitted that everything he does is a deception (See 1:08:33 time stamp)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter).

Nevertheless, in his newest video, he has rejected Ahmadiyya, however, the still wants to consider them Muslim, since he is some type confused neo-liberal Muslim and wants Muslims to unite (as-if Muslims were ever united). Really, he needs to get a real job and see what that’s like, can he even cut it?

One last thing, every criticism that Nabeel Alkhaldly made vs. Muslims around the world, Maulvi Razi showed how Ahmadi’s are just as rigid and thus, all of Nabeel Alkhalidy’s stupid assertions have fallen flat.

Continue reading “Nabeel Alkhalidy has openly rejected Ahmadiyya, Razi turns on him too!” →

Intro
Recently, I reviewed the position of Sheikh Imran Hosein on the substitution theory and in his book, “The Messiah the Qur’ān and Ākhir Al-Zamān” which was written by Sheikh Imran Hosein in 2021. As I began to read the book, I quickly realized that the Sheikh Imran Hosein is alleging that he Eisa (as) was on the cross (See page 124) and that Allah took the soul of Eisa (as) and then Eisa (As) died, then Allah returned it (See pages 132-134)(this is pure Kufr) and physically raised Eisa (as) towards himself and quoted 4:158 (4:159 in the Kadiani Koran).

Furthermore, Sheikh Assim spoke against Sheik Imran Hosein and called his preaching as bogus. Sheikh Assim explains how Sheikh Imran Hosein takes Qadiani positions on many things.

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Ibn Abbas is the main source for the substitution theory – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Ibn Abbas is the main source for the substitution theory

Sheikh Imran Hosein believes in the physical return of Eisa (as), and calls #ahmadiyya pathetic – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Sheikh Imran Hosein believes in the physical return of Eisa (as), and calls #ahmadiyya pathetic

The-Messiah-the-Quran-and-Akhir-al-Zaman.pdf

Click to access The-Messiah-the-Quran-and-Akhir-al-Zaman.pdf

Sheikh Imran Hosein believes in the physical return of Eisa (as), and calls #ahmadiyya pathetic – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Sheikh Imran Hosein believes in the physical return of Eisa (as), and calls #ahmadiyya pathetic

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad

Intro
In 2026 (Jun), on an episode with “This Week with Hujoor” (19:54 time stamp), in this video clip, this nerd (Idrees Munir) tells Mirza Masroor Ahmad that he is trying to trap innocent Muslims with Ahmadiyya (in Baltimore), however, they keep resisting and he needs advice. Mirza Masroor Ahmad tells him to keep trying to fool Muslims and be performative and pretend like a good person. Mirza Masroor Ahmad continued and told Idrees Munir to make fake friends with Muslims and to show them how good you are!

Continue reading “Idrees Munir is a legacy kid and working for Ahmadiyya and showing loyalty” →

Intro
In 2026, I bumped into a weirdo Ahmadi TikToker (@3.khurram) who lives on asylum in the UK and is thus loyal to the Mirza family and would even let them borrow his wife. Nevertheless, he tried to engage me on TikTok and wanted to talk to me on audio, however, I told him he must pass screening and he failed. All he did was cuss at me and make personal attacks, in fact, this is what he does on social media.

Continue reading “Who is @3.khurram, the stupid Ahmadi TikToker” →

Intro
The meaning of taking is in Bab Tafa’ul (or Tafa”ul) and the meaning of giving is in Bab Tafeel. In Arabic morphology (Sarf), Bab Tafa’ul (Form VI) and Bab Tafeel (Form II) are derived from the basic 3-letter (thulathi) verb ⁠Master Arabic Sarf Morphology – The SIX Baabs You Must …. Bab Tafeel expresses causation, intensity, and repetition ⁠How to reverse engineer verses | Form II | baab-e-taf’eel – YouTube, whereas Bab Tafa’ul expresses mutuality/reciprocity between two parties or feigning an action ⁠باب تفاعل Flashcards | Quizlet. [1]

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad confused Bab Tafa’ul (or Tafa”ul) and Bab Tafeel” →

Intro
In 2026 (Jun), at the 40:18 time stamp, Sheikh Asrar Rashid explained how there are 28 sahaba narrate the physical return of Eisa (as).

Continue reading “28 sahaba narrate the physical return of Eisa (as)” →