Intro
In April-May of 1908, in Chashma-e-Marifat, MGA and his team of writers wrote that Maryam (as) had both male and female “characteristics” and was thus able to impregnant herself via male sperm if she ever got excited. They were arguing that Hindu’s shouldn’t object to the miraculous birth since strange stories of births exist in Hindu literature. Such a ridiculous argument, MGA presented false arguments like this all the time, for example, vs. Athim (Christian)(in 1893) MGA argued against the miraculous birth of Eisa (as) and gave examples like insects being born in the rainy season out of nothing.
This was the first time that MGA and his team wrote as such, however, they did go back and forth on the birth of Eisa (as) and ultimately landed on the “Hermaphrodite Theory”. In 2022, A qadiani-Ahmadi named Dr. Jalil Ahmad Bhatti wrote an article wherein he accused Maryam of being a hermaphrodite. In 2023, I asked the West Africans about this and they had no idea. Also in 2023, Maulvi Razi Ullah Noman has admitted that Maryam had both male and female reproductive organs.
In Nov. of 2023, Tahir Nasser accused Maryam of having hormonal imbalance. Tahir Nasser also accused Maryam of seeing a handsome man (an angel) and getting excited, having an orgasm, and thus impregnating herself (see the scan in the below).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 23 page 226
Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, page 218
Ruhani Khazain, volume 23, page 225 and 226, Chasma-e-Maarfat:
“””Then the reader of the article raised an objection that why did Mary become pregnant by the Holy Spirit and why was Jesus born only to Mary. The answer to this is that the same God created him who, according to the Arya society, at the beginning of the earth created millions of people like radish and carrots every day, while according to the statement of the Vedas, millions of times and countless times God has created the world in the same way and did not require that a man and a woman meet to produce a child. So, if Jesus was born in the same way, then what is wrong with it? The root of this objection is only that why a man was born without the union of man and woman, but the person who holds this belief that it has been agreed millions of times before that this is the same in this world. Human beings are born without the union of male and female. How can he say this and how can he have the right to object against the birth of Jesus is against the Law of Nature. Great medical researchers who have gone before us have written about examples of birth and given precedents and their research shows that there are women who possess masculinity (sperm) and femininity (egg) in them and by some system when their semen is excited, pregnancy can occur, and such stories are also found in Hindu books. As in the Veda itself, it is said that O’Indra is the son of Karshi, whom I have written about earlier, so while this kind of story is also present in the Vedas and explained by Sayana Bhashikar then why question it? If this story has been written, then it is far from modest to object. Then he will say that the given answer that we presented does not mean that, and that the answer is not correct however it has been explained by the old commentator i.e., Sayana who has already made this meaning, so why do you want to turn away from it? Against Sayana Bhashikar, can we present Dayanand as the truth? In contrast to Sayana Bhashikar, one would call Dayanand a schoolboy, and then that Bhashikar belongs to the ancient past. And that by virtue of order the meaning of the Vedas that has been given by Sayana Bhashikar is above all whether you accept these meanings now or not, in any case……”””
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tahir Nasser tweeting
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Mufti Muhammad Shafi gives reference Ibn Sina’s Al-Qanun to prove this possibility of male-less birth. Ashraf Ali Thanvi stated this too, Abdul Majid Daryabadi quoted it too.
Ahmadi Muslim on X: “@MrAdnanRashid Conceiving a child without a man is not totally impossible. Mufti Muhammad Shafi gives reference Ibn Sina’s Al-Qanun to prove this possibility. Ashraf Ali Thanvi stated this too, Abdul Majid Daryabadi quoted it too. Even Anti-Ahmadiyya Literature accepts and quotes these things. https://t.co/ldIk43bCww” / X (twitter.com)
This is from the Tafsir of Mufti Muhammad Shafi (Deobandi).
Scans
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1903
Nasim-e-Da‘wat, Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 19, pp. 381
https://www.youtube.com/live/v32Lm0-rLMM?si=QFuSdTdhD8wC6xE7
Translation
Mary was slandered/accused and this slander humiliated the wonder of the birth of Eisa (as). But in this slander, the Jews alone are not be to blamed, but Mary herself had made a huge mistake, which gave the Jews an opportunity to slander her, and that is when Mary saw the angel in her vision/dream, and when the angel announced the good news of the pregnancy, Maryam deliberately kept this vision a secret, and she never told anyone, because her mother and father had dedicated her to the temple (Baitul Maqdas), she would always stay and work at the temple, and she would not ever marry and will remain a virgin. And she had herself decided that she would not get a husband and would remain in Baitul Maqdas. After having this dream, she had this fear, that if she disclosed this secret, that an angel has given her the good news of a boy, people will think it is a ploy to get married. That’s why, she kept this vision/dream a secret. But that dream was true, she got pregnant at the same time. And Maryam was unaware of this pregnancy for some time. After the 5th month of the pregnancy had passed, then it became famous that Maryam was pregnant, and then Maryam told people about her dream, but at that time it was useless to say so. At the end, her elders (Jewish elders), in an attempt to hide her shame/guilt, they got her married to Joseph the Carpenter. This is how this prophecy was stained””.
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1913
It seems that the District Magistrate (of Lahore) asked for money from Maulvi Sanaullah’s as a result of an article in the “Ahl-e-Hadis” magazine of Oct-31, 1913. This seems to be a response to the Qadiani article on the birth of Eisa (As). The grossly obscene Qadiani article appeared in the Al-Badr of Oct-30-1913. Maulvi Sanaullah and his team from his “Ahl-e-Hadis” magazine was forced to pay money as a form of a security. The Al-Badr was also forced to pay 3000 rupees as penalty. Reverend Mr. Howell seems to have also been part of this and he was warned by District Magistrate (of Lahore) and the Bishop of Lahore. Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was mentioned too and let off with a warning.
The Al-Badr newspaper is shut down by force by the British Government. Some governmental archives show how the Al-Badr and Nur Afshan newspapers were beefing with each other and causing lots of strife, the Ahl-e-Hadis newspaper was also involved. It seems that Mufti Muhammad Sadiq became a Christian in this era. See here—Religious Controversy between Nur Afshan and Ahmadiyya 3
Scans of Al-Badr, Oct-30-1913
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1988
Official Commentary by Malik Ghulam Farid
This is missing.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2018
Official Commentary by Malik Ghulam Farid
English w/ 5 Vol. Commentary – Holy Qur`an Online 3.6 (alislam.org)
See under 19:22 (19:23 in the Qadiani Quran). And 3:47 (3:48 in the Qadiani Quran). They alleged that tumors can cause the creation of Male sperm through a process called arrhenblastoma.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Chashma’-e-Ma‘rifat quotes and background information – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Mirza Tahir Ahmad called Esa (as)’s mother a Hermaphrodite!!!! – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
5 Pingback