Intro
On a recent live stream, Bro Imtiaz (via Tiktok live, Timestamp 1:27:14) quoted MGA on the possibility of female prophets from Al-Hakam of April-17-1903 (See also Malfuzat-5, Pages 65-66, Urdu 2022 edition). Firstly, MGA said that the door of prophethood is closed for men, how could it be open for women? MGA added that women are stupid and thus can’t be prophets, he quotes 2:228 (2:229 in the Qadiani Quran) and 4:34 (4:35 in the Qadiani Quran). A few days later, bro Imtiaz showed Part-2 of this very same reference in the Al-Badr of April-15-1903 (page 99-103, not published in Malfuzat)(On 5-21-25, Bro Imtiaz streamed again on this specific reference point (via Tiktok live, Timestamp 1:44:57) wherein MGA says again that prophethood has been negated for men and women. MGA also said that women are servants for men.
In May of 2025, Bro Imtiaz asked Maulvi Raheel Ahmad, Maulvi Razi, Ibrahim Ikhlaf and Maulvi Mansoor Clarke about this exact reference (see 4:28:08 timestamp). Maulvi Razi tried to accuse Bro Imtiaz of not showing the full reference. However, this is not true. Bro Imtiaz was quoting Al-Hakam, dated April-17-1903 (Number 14)(pages 9-10), Razi tried to mix up this reference with the one underneath it, which is from the Al-Badr newspaper (jild-2, Number 15, page 113), of May-1-1903 (dated by Ahmadi’s as April-16-1903), which was almost 2 weeks after the statement about female prophets. There is another reference just above both of these which is in the Al-Badr of April-15-1903 (page 99-103, not published in Malfuzat). That story actually connects with the story after the female prophet story. Thus, we have 2 stories mixed up together and purposely by the Ahmadi murrabi’s. On page 102, it says, that this is the rest of the explanation that MGA gave for the previous question on April 15-1903 (which appeared in the Al-Hakam, dated April-17-1903 (Number 14)(pages 9-10).
On 5-17-2025 (via TikTok live, 2:05:55 time stamp), Bro Imtiaz commented on the reference about the possibility of female prophets. Bro Imtiaz explained how Maulvi Razi was quoting Malfuzat for allegedly April-16th, 1903 (however, this was published on May-1903) whereas Bro Imtiaz was quoting an incident on April-17-1903, which is connected to Al-Badr of April-15-1903 (page 99-103, not published in Malfuzat).
On 5-21-25, Bro Imtiaz streamed again on this specific reference point (via Tiktok live, Timestamp 1:44:57).
In 1999, Mirza Tahir Ahmad gave an answer to a question about why only men were made prophets. Mirza Tahir Ahmad said that prophethood is a huge burden that women can’t bear.
2022 edition of Malfuzat, no sub ref given
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1903
Al-Hakam, dated April-17-1903 (Number 14)(pages 9-10)
Malfuzat-5, Pages 65-66, Urdu 2022 edition
Question: Can any women be a Prophet?
Mirza Ghulam Qadiani Said – Allah all mighty has said NO,
(Surat An-Nisa 34/35 Quran/Qadiani Quran) and (Surat Al-Baqarah 228/229 Quran/Qadian Quran) women in truth are below/underneath men as is to be. When this Sir is higher and this
Sir status for whom this one door has been closed ,so this poor incomplete
minded thing account** in which why/how?
Simple Translation:
No, Allah Almighty says (Surat An-Nisa 34/35
Quran/Qadiani Quran) and (Surat Al-Baqarah 228/229
Quran/Qadian Quran) Women are inferior to men. What will these poor, mentally
deficient women must account for when the door is closed to those who* are higher and
those who* have a higher status?
The Door was only open for Mirza Ghulam Qadiani.
*men
** Prophet
Scans
Al-Hakam, dated April-17-1903 (Number 14)(pages 9-10)
Malfuzat-5, Pages 65-66, Urdu 2022 edition
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Al-Badr of April-17-1903 (page 99 and 103)
Dated as April-15-1903
https://www.youtube.com/live/YnvGhA8jP1Y?si=7bW9Jydx7rEfr4qi (1:44:29 time stamp)
On page 102, it says, that this is the rest of the explanation that MGA gave for the previous question on April 15-1903 (which appeared in the Al-Hakam, dated April-17-1903 (Number 14)(pages 9-10).
Translation
“”Can a woman be a prophet?
Referring to prophethood, he said that once a woman claimed prophethood, when the hadith “La Nabiyya Badi” was presented to her, she replied, that it didn’t say “No Prophetess after me”, so it is the negation of prophethood of men and not of women. He (MGA) said she was at fault that the point in the Holy Qu’ran addressed to men. And God says: “Men are Qawwamoon over women”, that is, the men are like master (Malik). So, whatever commandments are for the master, the servant is covered in them automatically. When prophethood was negated for men, it has also been been negated from women, at a higher scale”.
Transliteration
“”Kya, Aurat nabeeha ho sukhtee hai?
Scans
Page 99
Page-103
Al-Badr of April-17-1903, page 103
Al-Badr of April-17-1903, page 103
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Al-Badr of April-17-1903, page 102
Dated as April-15-1903
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1903
Al-Badr newspaper (jild-2, Number 15, page 113), dated as May-1-1903 (dated as April-16-1903)
Scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1984
Malfuzat, 1984 Urdu edition, V-5, page 352, April-17-1903
Click to access Malfuzat-v5-1984.pdf
Edition 1984
January 17, 1903 to May 30, 1903
Question: Can any women be a Prophet?
Mirza Ghulam Qadiani Said – Allah all mighty has said NO,
(Surat An-Nisa 34/35 Quran/Qadiani Quran) and (Surat Al-Baqarah 228/229 Quran/Qadian Quran) women in truth are below/underneath men as is to be. When this Sir is higher and this
Sir status for whom this one door has been closed ,so this poor incomplete
minded thing account** in which why/how?
Simple Translation:
No, Allah Almighty says (Surat An-Nisa 34/35
Quran/Qadiani Quran) and (Surat Al-Baqarah 228/229
Quran/Qadian Quran) Women are inferior to men. What will these poor, mentally
deficient women must account for when the door is closed to those who* are higher and
those who* have a higher status?
The Door was only open for Mirza Ghulam Qadiani.
*men
** Prophet
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1988
Edition 1988, 1903 to 1904, Malfuzat 3, Pg. 254, 17 April 1903-Al-Hakam
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________2022
Edition 2022, April 1903 to December 1903, Malfuzat 5, Pg. 65
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Malfuzat-5, 2022 Urdu edition, pages 65-66, no sub ref given
Transliteration
“”Aikh naya nukhta, abad a namaz e maghrib, hazrat aqdas nay is taqreer ka irada farmaya….
is vaqt mein, ummat-e-musvi kee tara jo mamur or mujadide aiya, unka naam nabi rakha gaya. tau ismay yay hikmat tee, kay anh hazrat salalah ho wa salam, kee shaan khatme nubuwwat may furq na auta. (jiska mufassir zikr qabla…) aur, agar koy nabi nah auta, pir mumasat may furq na auta islee-ay allah talla nay, Adam, Ibrahim, aur musa vagayra maray naam rakhay gay, khatak kay akhir kar, Jerry ullah fee khulil anbiya, a kab, goya, iskay sab aitraz raffa au gai, aur apkee ummat mein, aikh akhree Khalifa aya jo musa kee tamam khulafa ka jamad tha”””.
Translation
“”A new point, after the prayer of maghrib, Hazrat Aqdis (MGA), gave additional information on this utterance….
In this time, like the followers of Musa (as), the Mamur’s and Mujadid’s who came, were given the name prophet. The wisdom in this was that the “shine” of khatme nubuwwat wouldn’t be contradictory (as mufassirs have written). And, if NO prophet would have came, then likenesss would not be established, this is why Allah added the names of Adam, Ibrahim, Musa and etc. to my name, in the end, I am also Jerry Ullah fee khulil anbiya, and then lifts all of the questions, and in your ummah, the last Khalifa came, who is like all the khulafa of Musa”.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
The “Al-Hakam” newspaper of the Ahmadiyya Movement – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
The history of the Al-Badr newspaper (1902-1914) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Who is Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Clarke? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
You searched for Ibrahim Ikhlaf – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Ibrahim+Ikhlaf
Maulvi Raheel Ahmad EXPOSED – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
What is Malfuzat? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2021/10/18/what-is-malfuzat/
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
1 Pingback